Overland Terrace Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP
3515 Overland Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90034 · For profit - Partnership · 87 certified beds · (310) 839-5201 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.5% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.8% | 1.2% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 23.3% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.4% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.4% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.1% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.1% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.7% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.1% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 11.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.1% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.1% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.15 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.12 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
39.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 62.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 124 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.63 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 39.2%CMS range 29.9–49.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.0%CMS range 8.9–16.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 62.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 55.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 55.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.9%CMS range 4.7–11.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.37 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 87 beds and averages 81.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.22 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.23 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the policy for pressure ulcer/injury (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) care assessment and treatment was followed, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to:Identify and document the pressure ulcer upon re-admission to the facility.Document a change of condition once the pressure ulcer was identified.Contact the resident's responsible party upon identification of a new pressure ulcer.Implement a low air-loss mattress (pressure ulcer intervention) in a timely manner after pressure ulcer was identified.These deficient practices resulted in Resident 1 having a delay in assessment, treatment and interventions for the sacrococcyx (area including the sacrum, large, triangular bone at the base of the spine and the coccyx the tailbone) pressure ulcer identified six days after re-admission from hospitalization on 5/8/26.1. During a review of Resident 1's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed ensure staff followed infection prevention policies and procedures for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (use of personal protective equipment, PPE [gloves, gown, mask and goggles or face shield] when providing wound care to a resident where EBP was indicated for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2).This deficient practice had the potential to result in exposure or transmission of infections to other residents and/or staff.During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, dated 6/30/26, the admission record indicated, the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells), hypertension, (HTN - high blood pressure), muscle weakness, hyperlipidemia (HLD - a condition characterized by elevated levels of lipids (fats) in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to:1. Ensure kitchen staff labeled all foods stored in the freezer with the correct food name, date of food delivery, date the food container was opened, and best by date. 2. Ensure staff did not pick up a meal ticket off the floor then placed the contaminated (something has been made impure, unclean, or dangerous by contact with or the addition of a harmful, foreign, or undesirable substance) meal ticket on one of six residents' (Resident 12) food trays then walked towards the dining room to serve the food tray to Resident 12 with the contaminated meal ticket still on the food tray. These deficient practices had the potential for Resident 12 and the residents who consume food from the kitchen to suffer from foodborne illnesses (refer to illnesses such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages) and food to contamination (the introduction of pathogens or infectious material into or on normally clean or sterile objects, spaces, or surface) resulting in hospitalization. Findings:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that staff treated residents with respect and dignity and did not calling the residents feeders for seven of seven sampled residents (Residents 2, 3, 20, 56, 57, 58 and 84) who needed assistance with feeding. This deficient practice had the potential for Residents 2, 3, 20, 56, 57, 58 and 84 not attain and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being and also suffer lowered self esteem.Findings: A review of Resident 2's admission record, indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, muscle weakness (a lack of physical or muscle strength, throughout the body), diabetes Type 2 (high blood sugar). A review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 5/6/2026, indicated Resident 2's cognition (the mental ability to make decisions of daily living) was severely impaired. Resident 2 required substantial/maximal assistance with all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that three of five residents (Resident 1, Resident 43, and Resident 61) who had severe cognitive (the mental ability to make decisions of daily living), did not sign the consent forms for Influenza (flu - illness caused by a virus that infect nose, throat and lungs), Pneumonia Immunization (immunization that protects against bacteria that causes pneumonia [infection of lungs)] and Corona Virus disease 2019 (COVID 19- is a highly contagious illness that affect lungs and then entire body) according to the facility's policies and procedures titled Resident Rights - Quality of Life reviewed on 1/2026, and P-NP67 Informed Consent effective date 1/30/2026. This deficient practice violated the rights of Resident 1, Resident 43 and Resident 61 and the residents' representatives to make informed decisions whether or not to receive and refuse the Flu, Pneumonia, and COVID 19 vaccines. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide television (TV) remote control for two of two sampled residents (Resident 7 and 62). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 7 feeling frustrated and complained of inability to watch TV and and feeling bored., and Resident 62 complaining of not having a TV remote for a long time and did not keep getting up to change the TV channel. Findings: During a review of Resident 7's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 7 on 4/26/2026 with diagnosis that included but not limited to muscle weakness, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications (DM type 2- (high blood sugar) and dependance on renal dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed). During the review of Resident 7's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 4/23/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 7 had a moderate cognitive (the mental ability…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' rights to privacy and confidentiality of records when Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN) 1 and LVN 5 left two of two residents' (Resident 8 and Resident 11) personal and medical information displayed on the computer screen unattended. This deficient practice of violating the residents' rights to privacy and confidentiality of records had the potential to cause psychological and financial harm to Resident 8 and Resident 11. Findings: 1.A review of Resident 8's admission record (face sheet - a document containing demographic and diagnostic information) indicated the facility admitted Resident 8 on 12/31/2025 with the following diagnoses: type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), acute kidney failure (when kidneys suddenly cannot remove waste from the blood), myocardial infarction type 2 (caused by a severe imbalance between the heart's oxygen supply…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the toilet bowl was clean and sanitary for one of three sampled residents (Resident 79). This deficient practice placed Resident 79 at risk for infections, lowered self esteem, and embarrassment. Findings: During a review of Resident 79's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 1/16/2026 with diagnoses that included but not limited to Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and muscle spasm (sudden, involuntary tightening of muscle which is difficult to relax). During a review of Resident 79's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 4/25/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 79 had no cognitive (the mental ability to make decisions of daily living) impairment. The MDS indicated Resident 79 needed set up or clean up assistance with activities of daily living (ADL- including upper/lower body dressing, personal hygiene, eating, oral hygiene, shower and toileting hygiene and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document the assessment, observation and communication entries on the nursing progress notes for two of the five residents (Residents 1 and 9). Resident 1 had a behavior of throwing feces on the floor. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the plan of care and delivery/provision of necessary care and services for Resident 1 and Resident 9. 1.During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record (face sheet - a document containing demographic and diagnostic information) indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 5/20/2020 and was re-admitted on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses: muscle weakness (when muscles are weak causing difficulty performing normal activities that require strength), cognitive communication deficit (trouble participating in conversations), epilepsy (a long term brain disease that causes repeated seizures due to abnormal electrical signals produced by damaged brain cells), atherosclerotic heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) in accordance with the facility policy and procedures (P&P) titled Person-Centered Care Planning with a revision date of 1/2026, by failing to initiate a baseline care plan within 48 hours after the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services needed for Resident 1 immediately upon admission.Findings: During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record (face sheet - a document containing demographic and diagnostic information) indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 5/20/2020 and was re-admitted on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses: muscle weakness (when muscles are weak causing difficulty performing normal activities that require strength), cognitive communication deficit (trouble participating in conversations), epilepsy (a long term brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain proper weight settings for the low air loss mattress (LALM-mattress designed to treat and prevent pressure ulcers) for three of five sampled residents (Resident 3, Resident 19 and Resident 57).This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 3, Resident 19 and Resident 57's pressure injuries to worsen or to develop new pressure injuries.Findings: 1. A review of Resident 3's admission record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 9/20/2024 and readmitted the resident on 5/8/2026 with diagnosis that included unstageable pressure ulcer of sacral region (full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed is obscured by slough or eschar), type 2 diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar) with foot ulcer, and chronic kidney disease (kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should). A review of Resident 3's potential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that enteral feed tubing (a flexible tube for delivering nutrient-rich liquid formula directly into the stomach or small intestine) was labeled with the date and time when hung up for one of one sampled resident (Resident 43). This deficient practice had potential for Resident 43 to suffer abdominal discomfort and infection.Findings: During a review of Resident 43's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 4/6/2026 with diagnoses that included but not limited to Dysphagia (inability to swallow) and unspecified Protein-Calorie malnutrition (potentially life-threatening condition due to inadequate intake of protein, calories or both). During a review of Resident 43's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 4/20/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 43 had severe cognitive (the mental ability to make decisions of daily living) impairment. The MDS indicated Resident 43 was dependent on staff and required maximum staff assist for activities of daily living (ADL-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled residents (Resident 77) who received dialysis (process of removing waste products and excess fluid from the body) treatment received care in accordance with standards of practice, by failing to:1. Complete Post Dialysis Assessment following Resident 77 returning from dialysis treatment.2. Implement the physician's order for fluid restriction of 1200 cubic centimeters (cc-unit of measurement) a day. These deficient practices had the potential to result in harm to the resident which could include edema or unchecked bleeding. Findings: A review of Resident 77's admission record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 1/2/20213 and readmitted the resident on 8/1/2025 with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (ESRD - loss of kidney function in which the kidneys no long work to meet the body's needs) and dependence on renal dialysis (the process of removing waste products and excess fluid from the body using a machine when the kidneys are not able to do so) and heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to observe infection control measures for three of four sampled residents (Resident 3, Resident 12, and Resident 79) by failing to ensure: 1. Resident 3's urinals (a container used to collect urine closed parentheses were labeled with the residents names and room numbers. 2. Ensure staff did not pick up a meal ticket off the floor then placed the contaminated (something has been made impure, unclean, or dangerous by contact with or the addition of a harmful, foreign, or undesirable substance) meal ticket on one of six residents' (Resident 12) food trays then walked towards the dining room to serve the food tray to Resident 12 with the contaminated meal ticket still on the food tray. 3. Ensure the toilet bowl in one of one resident (Resident 79) was clean and sanitary (clean and free from germs). These deficient practices had the potential for the residents to suffer from foodborne illnesses (refer to illnesses such as nausea, vomiting, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one staff (Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 7) completed Elder Abuse Mandated Reporter training according to the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Training Requirements dated reviewed, January 2026. had proof in the personnel file of the necessary training to care for residents in a safe and secure manner. This deficient practice had the potential for LVN 7 not to be able to identify and report suspected/allegation of abuse and placed the residents in the facility at increased risk for abuse. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/5/26 at 12:04 PM of LVN 7's personnel file. The personnel file indicated LVN 7 did not have Elder Abuse Mandated Reporter training upon hire. The Director of Staff Development (DSD)/LVN 2, stated, there is no Elder Abuse Mandated Reporter training in this staff members' file. DSD/LVN 2 checked and reviewed the facility electronic system but was not able to provide any additional information regarding abuse training for LVN 7. DSD/LVN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy regarding reporting resident to resident's allegation of physical abuse and to submit a conclusion report of investigation within five days or in accordance with state or federal law for two of six sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This resulted in a delay of an onsite inspection by the Department of Public Health to ensure the residents' allegation of abuse was investigated which can also lead to a delay in prevention of further physical abuse for Resident 1.Findings: A. During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis (loss of the ability to move in one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (lack of blood flow resulting in severe damage to some of the brain tissue) affecting left dominant side, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) received the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with Order Summary Report for psychological/psychiatrist consult follow-up treatment dated 9/23/2025 and the facility's policy and procedures titled Behavior Management reviewed on 1/2025, when:1. Resident 1's exhibited episodes of aggressive behavior towards Resident 4 (roommate) and became extremely agitated, disruptive, thrashing arms, uncontrolled screaming, and yelling on 9/23/2026 at 9:30 am., and used curse words, derogatory names, and racial slurs directed at Resident 4 and Resident 4's family members.2. Resident 1 became verbally abusive, extremely agitated, and physically aggressive towards Resident 4's family members. These deficient practices risked the safety of Resident 4, Resident 4's family members, other residents and staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0557 — patternHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to treat two out of 20 residents (Residents 11 and 45) with respect, dignity and, care by failing to provide person-centered care in a manner that promotes and supports the Residents quality of life. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the Residents' 11 and 45 physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a record review, Resident 11's medical record indicated Resident 11 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that muscle weakness, falling, depression (persistent feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and loss of interest or pleasure in activities.), cognitive communication deficit (disorder that affect a person's ability to communicate.), and anxiety (excessive and persistent worry, fear, and unease). During a record review, Resident 11's history and physical (H&P) dated 12/6/2024 indicated Resident 11 has the capacity to understand and make medical decisions. During a record review,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, sanitary, and homelike environment for residents in the facility by failing to: 1. Maintain residents' room temperature between 71 and 81 degree Fahrenheit (° F) as required by the Federal regulation for one of three sampled residents (Resident 70) and five of five rooms checked during a facility tour. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 70 stating of being cold and feeling uncomfortable making it hard for the resident to sleep. 2. Provide a clean, sanitary and in good repair environment in one jack and [NAME] bathroom (a shared bathroom situated between two bedrooms, featuring at least two entrances (one from each bedroom),) for residents in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. This deficient practice had the potential to expose Residents and disease-causing pathogens/ micro-organisms that can cause infection, spread diseases. Findings: a. During an observation on 3/3/2025 at 8:55 AM, Resident 70 sleeping in bed covered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report to the Department of Health Services (CDPH), Licensing and Certification and the local health officer an unusual occurrence for two of six sample residents (Residents 17 and 71) an unwitnessed fall with injury within twenty-four (24) hours of confirmed occurrence per facility policy. On 12/23/2024 at around 11:35 AM, Resident 17 had an unwitnessed fall and sustained a skin tear to the right upper eyebrow. On 12/23/2024 Resident 17 was transfered to a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) for a higher level of care and evaluation. On 2/28/2025 at 6:42 PM, Resident 71 had an unwitnessed fall and sustained a cut to the left eyebrow. On 2/28/2025, Resident 71 was transferred to GACH for higher level care and evaluation. This deficient practice resulted in a delay of an onsite inspection by CDPH to ensure Residents 17 and 71 allegation of an unwitnessed fall with a significant injury was investigated in a timely manner placing the residents at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of two sampled residents (Resident 71) from repeated falls. Resident 71 fell on [DATE], 12/1/2024, 12/20/2024, and 12/27/2024. As a result, on 2/28/2025, Resident 71 fell again in the facility and sustained a cut (laceration) to the left eyebrow and first aid administered. On 2/28/2025, Resident 71 was transferred via 911 (emergency response number) to a general acute care hospital (GACH) for further evaluation and care. Findings: During a record review, Resident 71's admission record indicated was re-admitted on [DATE], with a diagnoses of history of falling and unspecified Dementia (cause of dementia cannot be determined, often used when a person's cognitive decline is present). During a record review, the facility fall list indicated Resident 71 fell 5 times in the facility on 10/26/2024, 12/1/2024, 12/24/2024, 12/27/2024, and 2/28/2025. During a record review, Resident 71's Fall Risk Evaluation dated 10/24/2024 at 11:51…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to label and store medications in a locked compartment for one sampled resident (Resident 27). This deficient practice had the potential to result in: 1. Resident 27 self medicating without a physician's order. 2. Resident 27 receiving/consuming expired medication. Findings: During a concurrent observation, interview, and record review with the facility Dietary Supervisor (DS) on 3/5/2025 at 10:06 am, the residents outside food storage refrigerator was observed noted multiple food items without expiration dates on them, expired foods, and expired medication in Resident 27's food bag. DS stated, it is the license nurses responsibility to check the residents outside food items before they store it in the refrigerator. During an observation and interview on 3/5/2025 at 2:34 PM, of medication cart A with License Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) medication cart noted to be clean. Stated he has been employed with the facility for 1 year. Stated all medications and biologicals are dated and stored properly in the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the food recipe when preparing lunch for the residents. These failures had the potential to result in resident receiving diets that could have made the residents sick for 81 of 81 residents. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview on 03/03/2025 at 9:30 AM, Dietary [NAME] was observed preparing lunch for the residents and not following the recipe. Dietary [NAME] was pouring black pepper into the ground beef. Dietary [NAME] stated has worked in the facility for 8 years. Dietary [NAME] stated he did not follow the recipe for cooking ground beef. Dietary [NAME] stated if he does not use the measuring utensils and follow the recipes' when preparing meals, he could use too much seasoning that can make the residents sick. During an interview on 03/03/2025 at 9:36 AM, Dietary Supervisor (DS) stated all the Dietary Cooks are supposed to follow the recipes for all meals when preparing food for the residents. DS stated DS last in-serviced dietary staff on following the recipes two weeks ago.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Store, label, and date food items stored in the refrigerator, freezer in the kitchen 2. Label and date the residents outside food stored in the resident's refrigerator 3. Check, record, and maintain the appropriate temperatures for the residents' food refrigerator and freezer for 03/2025. These failures had the potential for the residents to consume expired food and spoiled foods that could result in food borne illnesses. Findings: During the initial tour of the kitchen and concurrent interview on 03/03/25 at 7:55 am with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the following was observed: 1. Ground nut [NAME] and salt did not have the original label and did not have the expiration or used by date on containers. 2. [NAME] ground pepper did not have use by or expiration date on container. 3. Ground cinnamon no expiration or used by date on container. 4. Pumpkin spice no expiration or used by date on container. 5. Barbeque sauce with an expiration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to observe infection control measures by: 1. Failing to put on and use (don) personal protective equipment (PPE-gowns and gloves) while providing Activities of daily leaving (ADL- self-care tasks necessary for daily functioning and maintaining independence) to a one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 15) who was on enhanced barrier precaution (EBP- infection control measures that expand the use of PPE, during high-contact resident care activities to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs - microorganisms, typically bacteria, that have become resistant to multiple classes of antibiotics). 2. Failing to provide and maintain a safe, clean, and sanitary environment in a one jack and [NAME] bathroom (a shared bathroom situated between two bedrooms, featuring at least two entrances (one from each bedroom) for two of two sampled residents rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]) by failing to ensure there was no dried hard smear by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately initiate/develop and implement a baseline care plan for one of five sampled residents (Resident 31) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled Comprehensive Person-Centered Care planning, reviewed 1/2025. Resident 31 has a history of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services needed for Resident 31. Findings: During a record review, Resident 31's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 31 on 12/17/2024 with diagnoses including PTSD, and hypertension (HTN - high blood pressure). During a record review, of Resident 31's history and physical (H&P - a physician's examination of the patient) dated 12/17/2024, indicated .history of present illness . PTSD. During a record review, Resident 31's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure resident received appropriate treatment and services to prevent a urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) for one of three residents (Resident 12) by failing to ensure resident's indwelling urinary catheter (a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain or collect urine) was placed below the level of the bladder at all times. This deficient practice had the potential to result in urinary tract infections for the resident. Findings: During a record review, Resident 12's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 4/16/2020 and readmitted the resident on 5/14/2024 with diagnoses including obstructive and reflux uropathy, chronic kidney disease (progressive damage and loss of function in the kidneys) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH - is a condition that occurs when the prostate gland enlarges, potentially slowing or blocking the urine stream). During a record review, Resident 12's Risk for UTI care plan, initiated 5/26/2024, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Label tube feeding syringe and feeding tube 2. Change tube feeding set for one of five sampled residents (Resident 41). These deficient practices had the potential to cause infection and/or possible hospitalization. Findings: During a record review, Resident 41's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 41 on 7/10/2024 with diagnoses including encephalopathy (a brain disorder that can cause a change in how the brain functions), generalized weakness (a feeling of weakness in most parts of the body), and adult failure to thrive (a noticeable decline in health). During a record review, Resident 41's physician order dated 10/9/2024 indicated enteral feed order, every night shift change tubing syringe daily. During a record review, Resident 41's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 12/19/2024, indicated Resident 41 had cognitive impairment (when a person has trouble remembering, learning new things, concentrating, or making decisions that affect their everyday life). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide outside services as required by the physician orders in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled Referral to Outside Services revised 1/2025, by failing to refer one of five sampled residents (Resident 21) to a dentist (a healthcare professional that specializes in caring for teeth, gums, and related oral health problems). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services for Resident 21. Findings: During a record review, Resident 21's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 21 on 2/6/2025 with diagnoses including dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough), generalized weakness (a feeling of weakness in most parts of the body), and Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a record review, the physician order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow their own Policy and Procedure (P&P) by failing to conduct and complete a personal property inventory for one of the three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to leave personal property to be unaccounted for and easily be missed. Findings: During a review of the admission record for Resident 1 indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] 3 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), heart failure (CHF-a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), and insomnia (trouble falling asleep or staying asleep). During a review of a history and physical (a term used to describe a physician's examination of a patient. In an H&P, the physician obtains a thorough medical history from the patient, performs a physical examination, and then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), received the necessary, care, treatment and services to maintain activities of daily living (ADLs) This deficient practice resulted in lack of mobility and incontinent care for Resident 1 and the potential for Resident 1 to decline in her abilities to achieve her highest practicable well-being and quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Records, dated 1/14/2025, the admission Records indicated, Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including neoplasm of bone (the development of cancer in the bones), morbid (severe) obesity, muscle weakness, unspecified open wound of the abdominal wall, anxiety (a person is often worried or anxious about many things and finds it hard to control) disorder. During the review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 9/10/2024, the MDS indicated, Resident 1 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), received care and treatment according to the professional standards of practice to meet the resident's physical and psychosocial needs: This deficient practice had the potential to increase discomfort and developing pressure injury (injury to skin underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on parts of a body, skin) and psychosocial decline of Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Records, dated 1/14/2025, the admission Records indicated, Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of including but not limited to Neoplasm of bone (the development of cancer in the bones), morbid (severe) obesity, muscle weakness, unspecified open wound of the abdominal wall, anxiety (a person is often worried or anxious about many things and finds it hard to control) disorder. During the review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents (Resident 1) received care and services necessary to prevent accidents and falls, by failing to accurately assess Resident 1's fall risk upon admission on [DATE]. This deficient practice placed Resident 1 at an increased risk for to not receiving care and services necessary to prevent accidents and falls. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 10/9/2024 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements), anoxic brain damage, history of falling and diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), unspecified convulsions. A review of Resident 1's hypertension care plan, initiated 10/10/2024 indicated the resident had high blood pressure. The care plan interventions included the facility administer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-15 · tag F0694 — patternProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two of six sampled residents ' (Residents 4 and 6) intravenous (IV, a small tube introduced via a needle into a vein to receive medications and nutrition]) sites were properly secured, labeled and changed per physician ' s orders and the facility ' s policy and procedures. This failure resulted in Resident 4 ' s IV site not being changed as ordered by physician every 48 hours, and Resident 4 and Resident 6 ' s IV sites being improperly labeled as per policy. Findings: A review of Resident 4 ' s admission Record, dated 3/15/24, indicated, Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: type II diabetes mellitus (a condition where your body has trouble controlling the level of sugar in the blood), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids), muscle weakness, urinary tract infection (infection of any part of the urinary tract), and hypertension (high blood pressure). A review of Resident 4 ' s Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents ' (Resident 3) physician order for gastrostomy (G-tube, is a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for administration of food, fluids, and medications) tube feeding were followed. This failure resulted in Resident 3 not receiving the correct amount of formula via g-tube from 3/14/24 at 10 pm until 3/15/24 at 10 am (12 hours at 70 milliliters [ml, metric unit of measurement for liquids] an hour equals 840 ml total). Findings: A review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record, dated 3/15/24, indicated, Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hydrocephalus (a buildup of fluid in the brain), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids) following cerebral infarction (stroke), and gastrostomy (G-tube). A review of Resident 3 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool), dated 2/21/24, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations/interviews/record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's(s') right to be free from resident-to-resident physical abuse by failing ensure the director of nursing (DON) reviewed the general acute care hospital (GACH) admission inquiry for one of three residents (Resident 2). As a result, on 3/1/2024, Resident 2 punched Resident 1 on the face sustaining facial injuries. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a common lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), and epilepsy (a disorder of the brain characterized by repeated seizures). A review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P) dated 4/8/23, indicated Resident 1 could make needs known but could make medical decisions. A review of resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a comprehensive standardized assessment and screening tool) dated 1/9/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations/interviews/record review, the facility failed to ensure the director of nursing (DON) reviewed the general acute care hospital (GACH) admission inquiry for one of three residents (Resident 2) prior to admission. As a result, on 3/1/2024, the facility's marketer reviewed, accepted and admitted Resident 2 to the facility on 2/29/2024. Cross Reference F600 Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a common lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), and epilepsy (a disorder of the brain characterized by repeated seizures). A review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P) dated 4/8/23, indicated Resident 1 could make needs known but could make medical decisions. A review of resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a comprehensive standardized assessment and screening tool) dated 1/9/2024, indicated Resident 1's [cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and hazard free environment ensure three of eight sampled residents (Residents 11, 40, and 47) by failing to ensure. 1. Resident 40 did not keep cigarettes and a lighter at bedside/on oneself. 2. A rollator walker (a device that gives support to maintain balance or stability while walking) and a wheelchair (a manually operated device with wheels that is intended for medical purposes to provide mobility to persons restricted to a seating position) did not impede Resident 11 and resident 47's door from opening completely. This failure resulted had the potential to result in fire resulted injury, accidents, hospitalization, and death to Residents 11, 40, and 47 having an accident while smoking. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 40's admission record indicated Resident 40 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses not limited to muscle weakness (decrease in muscle strength), lack in coordination (impairment of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct and documet pain assessment to ensure adequate pain management for one of three sampled residents (Resident 33). This deficient practice had the potential to result in unrelieved or ineffective pain control for the resident receving comfort care. Findings: A review of Resident 33's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities),diabetes mellitus (a disorder in which the amount of sugar in the blood is elevated), and hypertension (HTN -elevated blood pressure). A review of Resident 33's history and physical (H&P -a medical completer and formal assessment of the patient and the problem) dated 6/21/2023, indicated Resident 33, does not have the capacity for medical decision making due to cognitive (involving mental activities such as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-23 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedures to ensure an evaluation was made by the physician within 72 hours of admission for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 32). This deficient practice had the potential for the resident not receiving necessary care and treatment timely based on the physician's evaluations. Findings: A review of Resident 32's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis that affects one side of the body), encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system (system that converts food eaten in its simplest forms like glucose [sugar]), and hypertension (HTN -elevated blood pressure). A review of Resident 32's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care-screening tool), dated 1/5/2024, indicated Resident 32 had intact cognition (thought process involving learning, reasoning, remembering) and was dependent on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Bases on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure menu was followed to cook vegetables according to their dietary recipes. This deficient practice had the potential not to meet the residents' dietary and nutritional needs. Findings: During a tour of kitchen on 2/22/24 11:55 a.m., [NAME] 1 poured salt directly into a pan of vegetables without using a measuring device. During a concurrent interview, the [NAME] 1 stated she did not follow the recipe for cooking vegetables. [NAME] 1 also stated if the recipes are not followed, the residents could get the wrong diet. During an interview on 2/22/24 12:00 p.m., with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the DS stated Cooks had been trained on how to measure food items during their training. The DS stated, if recipes are not followed, the residents could consume the wrong diet which could make them sick. A review of the facility policy and procedures (P&P) titled Standard Recipes with a review date of 1/2024, indicated the facility is to provide the dietary department with the guidelines for the use of standardized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL-such as bathing, showering, toileting, and mobility) for two of eight residents (Residents 13 and 68) This failure resulted in Resident 68 feeling angry and also had the potential for Residents 13 and 68 to develop skin infections, skin irritation, and foul odor. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 13's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses not limited to morbid obesity (weight of more than 80 to 100 pounds above their ideal body weight), muscle weakness (decrease muscle strength). A review of Resident 13's History and Physical (H&P) dated 6/6/23, it indicated Resident 13 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of resident 13's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a comprehensive standardized assessment and screening tool) dated 12/10/23, indicated Resident 13's [cognitive skills- the core skills your brain uses to think, read, learn, remember, reason,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure they have procedures in place to document a resident's choices regarding issues like Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR - an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when a person breathing and/or heart stops) for one of three sample residents (Resident 12) by failing to ensure the code status ((level of medical interventions a person wishes to have started if their heart or breathing stops) ) documents (Physician order, POLST, and Advance Directives [a legal document that states a person's wishes about receiving medical care if that person is no longer able to make medical decisions because of a serious illness or injury]) were on file and readily available for review in case of a medical emergency for Resident 12. This failures had the potential for the facility not to honor the wishes and delay necessary medical services during an emergency for Resident 12. Findings: A review of Resident 12's face sheet (background information;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to change, label, and date nebulizers tubing and mask and store a nebulizer mask set-up bag for one of eight sampled residents. This failure had the potential for contamination of nebulizer mask and use nebulizer tubing with past open dates for Resident 24. Findings: A review of Resident 24's admission Record Resident 24 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses of but not limited to pneumonia (a condition where air sacs in the lungs become inflamed and filled with fluid or pus), methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA - a type of bacteria that causes an infection that does not respond to certain types of antibiotics), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - is a common lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems). A review of Resident 24's History and Physical (H&P) dated 2/1/24, indicated Resident 24 had the capacity to make medical decisions. A review of Resident 24's physician orders dated 2/1/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three facility staff were competent (a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics that an individual needs to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully) and had the skills set to weigh residents appropriately and accurately. This failure had the potential for inaccurate residents' weight calculation that could result in neglecting necessary and or implementing unwanted medical interventions. Findings: A record review of the facility's in-service education titled Hoyer lift (a mechanical lifting device to weigh a patient) and standing weight scale, dated 09/05/2023, indicated, Restorative Nurse Assistant 1 (RNA 1 - assists residents in performing tasks that restore or maintain physical function) attended the in-service education. The in-service lesson plan did not indicate how to appropriately use a Hoyer lift and standing weight scale when weighing residents. During an interview with RNA 1 on 02/22/2024 at 9:59 AM, RNA 1 stated, I put…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store and label food in accordance with professional standards and facility policy to ensure food service safety by failing to: 1. Label food with the resident's name and date received. 2. Discard expired food stored in the resident's refrigerator. Those deficient practices placed residents with compromised health status at risk for foodborne illnesses. Findings: During an observation on 2/20/24 at 3:08 p.m., of resident's refrigerator with the Director of Nursing (DON), several food items were observed without resident's name, dates and some were past expiration date. During a concurrent interview with the DON, the DON stated Housekeeping (HK) is responsible for cleaning the refrigerator for residents and nurses are responsible to label foods received residents' family members. The DON stated residents could get food poisoning and become very sick if they consumed expired food. During an interview on 2/20/24 at 3:24 p.m., the HK stated HK is supposed to clean the refrigerator weekly on Fridays and the nurses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to implement its' abuse policy and procedures when the facility failed to report to the California Department of Public Health (State Agency) of an alleged abuse of one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice resulted in a delay for an onsite investigation of the alleged abuse and places Resident 1 to continuous verbal and mental abuse from Resident 3. Findings: A review of Resident 1's face sheet indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Type 2 diabetes (an impairment in the way the body regulates and uses glucose [sugar] as a fuel), metabolic encephalopathy (a problem in the brain caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood. The imbalance is caused by an illness or organs that are not working as well as they should. When the imbalance affects the brain, it can lead to personality changes) and hemiplegia & hemiparesis of the left side (loss of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medical records requested upon written request on 12/8/24 within two working days per facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled Resident Access to PHI, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice denied Resident 1 and the representative (RP) the right to have access to their medical records as indicated in their P&P. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record (FS) for Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included, PUs of the left and right ankles stage 3 (Stage I: Intact skin with redness, Stage II: partial thickness, Stage III: full thickness skin loss, Stage IV: full thickness tissue loss, Suspected deep tissue injury, Unstageable: full thickness skin or tissue loss), diabetes mellitus 2 (a condition that happens because of a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel), and cognitive communication deficit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan that meet the care/services based on the resident ' s individual assessed needs for one of two sampled residents (Resident 4) by failing to ensure: 1. Resident 4 ' s right buttock Pressure Ulcer (PU- skin and soft tissue injuries that form because of constant or prolonged pressure exerted on the skin. These ulcers occur at bony areas of the body) was care planned. 2. Resident 4 ' s right first and fifth metatarsal (a group of 5 long bones in the middle of your foot. They connect the back part of your foot to your toes) Arterial Ulcer (a painful, deep sore or wound in the skin of the lower leg or foot. The ulcer doesn't heal as you'd expect an ordinary sore to heal. That's because there isn't enough blood flowing to the area. Blood supplies oxygen and nutrients to the tissues) was care planned. These deficient practices had the potential to result negative impact on Resident 4 ' s wounds healing thereby…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed provide services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards and principles that apply to professionals for one of four sampled residents (Resident 4) by failing to: 1. Ensure physician orders were carried out. 2. Initial skin assessment was completed upon admission. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 4 and an increased risk for worsening of the Pressure Ulcers (PU- skin and soft tissue injuries that form because of constant or prolonged pressure exerted on the skin. These ulcers occur at bony areas of the body) and/or new PU development. Findings: A review of the Resident 4's admission Record indicated Resident 4 was readmitted on [DATE] indicated Resident 4 was admitted with diagnosis that included, PUs of the left and right ankles stage 3 (Stage I: Intact skin with redness, Stage II: partial thickness, Stage III: full thickness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-03-06 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 28 of 39 resident rooms (rooms 131,132, 134, 135,136,137, 139, 140, 142, 143, 144, 146, 148, 150, 154, 202, 203, 204, 205, 208, 209, 210, 211, 216, 220, 221, 222, 228) that the square footage requirements of 80 square feet per resident this deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space for nursing care and privacy and safety of residents. Findings: On 3/3/2025, the facility administrator provided a copy of the Client Accommodation Analysis and a facility letter requesting a room waiver. During a record review, the Client Accommodation Analysis indicated 28 resident rooms do not have at least 80 square feet per resident. The room waiver request and the client accommodation analysis indicated the following Room# No. of Beds Room square fo otage 132 2 144 134 2 144 139 3 216 136 2 144 140 2 144 142 2 144 144 2 144 146 2 144 148 2 144 150 3 216 143 2 144 154 3 228 137 3 216 131 3 216 135 3 216 208 3 216 209 3 216 205 2 144 204 2 144 210 2 144 211 2 144 203 3 216 202 3 216 216 4 288 220…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES — 40 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
The other 39 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/18/2024 |
| ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/12/2025 |
| LIPMAN, NOSSON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/07/2023 |
| NIKNAM, DANIEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/28/2022 |
| GOLDLEAF TWELVE GP LLC | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2014 |
| RECHNITZ, SHLOMO | Individual | LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/01/2014 |
| OVERLAND TERRACE-LET LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/04/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $682K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055504. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.