West Pico Terrace Healthcare & Wellness Centre LP
6070 W. Pico Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90035 · For profit - Partnership · 49 certified beds · (323) 653-3980 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.8% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 11.8% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.9% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.6% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.2% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 1.1% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.8% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.7% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.8% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.7% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.94 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.70 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
39.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 110 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 68.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 82 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.98 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 39.2%CMS range 31.2–48.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.1%CMS range 9.2–16.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 68.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 61.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 65.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.9%CMS range 5.5–11.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.43 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 49 beds and averages 45.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.93 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure:Four residents on the pureed diet (foods that do not require chewing and are easily swallowed. All food should be smooth and pureed to the consistency of pudding) received bread texture in form that meet their needs and in accordance with international Dysphagia Diet Initiative IDDSI (IDDSI- a framework made up of levels and describes food textures and drink thickness) Level Four (pureed foods and extremely thick drinks) when the texture of the pureed bread was lumpy, not smooth and had small pieces of bread crust present requiring chewing before swallowing.Soft and Bite size diet texture was prepared according to the IDDSI-Level 6 (All foods prepared for are soft and chopped into bite size 1/2 inch x 1/2 inch pieces) when 12 resident received minced (ground) texture meats and vegetables instead of chopped into bite size pieces 1/2 inch per diet order. These deficient practices had the potential to result in meal dissatisfaction, decreased nutritional intake and increased choking risk for the residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices when certified nursing assistant (CNA) 1 failed to wear a gown while providing direct care to one of five sampled residents (Resident 5). Resident 5 was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP- are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs)). This deficient practice had the potential to transmit infectious microorganisms to the other residents in the facility. Findings: A review of the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 5 on 5/22/2024 and re-admitted the resident to the facility on 1/23/2023, with diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD -irreversible kidney failure), Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). A review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool) dated 1/29/2026, indicated Resident 5's cognition (ability to think,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents rights to privacy when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 failed to close the privacy curtain/s while the performing personal care for one of 32 sampled residents (Resident 5) to ensure Resident 5 was not visually exposed to the roommates. This deficient practice violated the resident's right for privacy for Resident 5. Findings: A review of Resident 5's admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 6/25/2025 and re-admitted the resident to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD -irreversible kidney failure), Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). A review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool) dated 1/29/2026, indicated Resident 5's cognition (ability to think, understand, and reason) was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of the three sampled residents' (Resident 4) Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR - a screening evaluation used to determine whether placement in a long term care facility is appropriate for the resident) Level I (a tool that helps identify possible serious mental illness and/or intellectual/development disability) assessment was accurately completed. This deficient practice of failing to accurately complete PASARR Level I assessment for Resident 4 puts Resident 4 at risk for not receiving the necessary care and services tailored to Resident 4's needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission record (face sheet - a document containing demographic and diagnostic information) indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: unspecified dementia (a condition in which a person loses the ability to think, remember, learn, make decisions, and solve problems), bipolar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized and comprehensive plan that is specific for the of care for one of five sampled residents (Resident 5) with diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a ineffective nursing and medical care for Resident 5. Findings: A review of the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 5 on 5/22/2024 and re-admitted the resident to the facility on 1/23/2023, with diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD -irreversible kidney failure), DM and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). A review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool) dated 1/29/2026, indicated Resident 5's cognition (ability to think, understand, and reason) was moderately impaired. The MDS further indicated Resident 5 required substantial assistance from staff for toileting hygiene, bathing and lower body dressing. The MDS also indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food served was flavorful and/or at the proper temperature for one of one sampled residents (Resident 34). This deficient practice had the potential to impact the resident's nutritional status, quality of life and can lead to insufficient food intake for Resident 34. Findings: A review of the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 34 on 8/4/2025 and readmitted the resident on 3/19/2026, with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (ESRD -irreversible kidney failure), Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 34's History and Physical 3/20/2026, indicated the resident was at risk for acute exacerbation, decompensation or functional decline. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 3/26/2026, indicated Resident 34 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident 34 required set-up assistance from staff for eating and oral hygiene. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the medical records were complete and accurate for two of two sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). 1.For Resident 1, the facility failed to verify that the physician obtained the informed consent (voluntary agreement to accept treatment and/or procedures after receiving education regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives offered) from Resident 1 on 4/1/25 before starting Resident 1 on Buspirone (medication that treats anxiety) 30 milligrams (mg. - metric unit of measurement, used for medication dosage and/or amount) two times a day. 2. For Resident 2, the facility failed to verify that the physician obtained informed consent from Resident 2 ' s responsible party on 4/9/25 before giving Resident 1 Mirtazapine (medication to treat depression) 15 mg., Quetiapine (medication that treats certain mental condition) 50 mg. and Buspirone 20 mg. This deficient practice resulted in inaccurate and incomplete medical records for Resident 1 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure boxed food items were not stored directly on the floor. This deficient practice had a potential to cause food contamination, which placed the residents of the facility at risk for foodborne illnesses (refers to illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages). Findings: During a concurrent interview and observation in the dry storage on 2/5/25 at 5:32 PM with [NAME] 1 (CK1), the following food items were observed stacked directly on the floor: a. One box of Thickened dairy drink b. One box of thickened lemon-flavored water c. 25- pound bag of sugar CK1 stated these food items in boxes were delivered earlier in the day and were not placed on the racks. CK1 stated the boxes should be stored at least 6 inches off the floor to prevent contamination and not to spread infection to the residents. During an interview on 2/8/25 at 4:02 PM, the Dietary Supervisor (DS1) stated boxes are to be stored 6 inches off the floor for infection control. During an interview on 2/9/25 at 5:59 PM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1. Ensure one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 4) who tested negative for coronavirus (COVID-19 - an infectious disease that can cause respiratory illness in humans) was not cohorted with a resident who tested positive with COVID-19. 2. Ensure the Physician's order for transmission-based precaution was updated for Resident 30. These deficient practices had the potential to transmit infectious diseases and increase the risk of infection to the residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: 1a. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 4 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including pneumonia (lung infection that inflames air sacs with fluid or pus), acute respiratory failure (condition in which your blood does not get enough oxygen or has too much carbon dioxide), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) following cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of six sampled residents, (Resident 3 and Resident 29)'s clinical record was updated per facility's policy and procedure by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 3's Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST - is a form designed to improve patient care by creating a portable medical order form that records patients' treatment wishes so that emergency personnel know what treatments the patient wants in the event of a medical emergency) were complete and accurate. 2. Ensure Resident 29's Advance Healthcare Directives (AHCD - written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) were followed up and discussed with the residents and/or responsible parties. These deficient practices had the potential to cause conflict with resident's wishes regarding health care decisions. Findings: I. During record review, the admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-09 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one out of three sampled residents (Resident 10) was free from physical restraint by failing to ensure the physician's order for bilateral bed siderails was in placed and the proper use of use rails are appropriate according to facility's policy and procedure. This deficient practice had the potential to result in entrapment and injury with the use of restraints. Cross Reference F656 Findings: During record review, the admission Record indicated Resident 10 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (lack of blood flow resulting in severe damage to some of the brain tissue), Parkinson's disease (a chronic brain disorder that causes movement problems, and can also affect mental health, sleep, and pain), Type II Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and muscle wasting and atrophy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-09 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notification (holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident is absent from the facility for therapeutic leave or hospitalization) in writing at the time of transfer to the hospital for one of three sampled residents (Resident 38). This deficient practice denied Resident 38 or the Responsible Party (RP) of being informed of resident's right to have the facility hold and reserve his bed while absent from the facility. Findings: During record review of Resident 38's admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated Resident 38 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (brain damage that causes severe confusion and forgetfulness), bladder cancer and chronic kidney failure (a condition in which the kidneys suddenly can't filter waste from the blood). During record review of Resident 38's Bed Hold Agreement form, dated 12/6/24 indicated the form had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-09 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a change of condition (COC -a sudden deviation from person/patient's baseline in physical, cognitive, behavioral or function) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled Change of Condition Notification reviewed 6/20/2024 for one out of six residents (Resident 23) This deficiency practice had the potential to result in the delay of care for Resident 23. Findings: During record review, Resident 23's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 23 on 7/3/2023 with diagnoses including dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough), personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA - a temporary blockage of blood flow to the brain) and cerebral vascular accident (CVA- Stroke) without residuals, and hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure). During record review of Resident 23's Minimum Data Set (MDS - resident assessment tool) dated 1/10/2025, indicated Resident 23 had cognitive impairment (when a person has trouble…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-09 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately develop and implement a baseline care plan according to their Policy and Procedures (P&P) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled Comprehensive Person-Centered Care planning revised 11/2018 for one of four sampled residents (Resident 6), by failing to: 1. Address the inclusion of activity programs that are tailored to Resident 6's interests and to Resident 6's cognitive, physical/functional and social abilities to stimulate and facilitate Resident 6's social engagement. 2. Outline a personalized treatment strategy for Resident 6's hearing loss within 48 hours of admission. These deficient practices had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services for Resident 6. Findings: During record review, Resident 6's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 6 on 11/23/2024 with diagnoses including dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough), generalized weakness (a feeling of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan (CP) that met the care/services based on the resident's individual assessed needs for one of six sampled residents (Resident 10), by failing to ensure that a comprehensive CP was developed with the use of Resident 10's bilateral (both) bed siderails, when Resident 10 was hospitalized on [DATE], 7/22/2024, and 12/27/2024. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a negative impact on residents' health and safety, as well as the quality of care and services received. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 10 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including cerebral infarction (lack of blood flow resulting in severe damage to some of the brain tissue), Parkinson's disease (a chronic brain disorder that causes movement problems, and can also affect mental health, sleep, and pain), Type II Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise the enteral feeding care plan to meet the individual needs for one of two sampled residents (Resident 22). This deficient practice had the potential to prevent Resident 22 from receiving care to address specific needs, which could lead to a decline in her nutrition. Findings: A review of Resident 22's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 22 on 10/9/24 with diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (CVA-stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and heart failure (a disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling). A review of Resident 22's Minimum Data Set [MDS - a resident assessment tool] dated 1/8/25 indicated the resident had severely impaired cognition (never/rarely made decisions) and was totally dependent upon staff for eating, oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, lower body dressing and personal hygiene. The MDS also indicated Resident 22 had a feeding tube. A review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician when they were unable to collect urine sample for urinalysis, culture and sensitivity (UA [a test to check if the urine has an infection, kidney problem, diabetes or liver disease] and C&S [test to find germs & the type of antibiotics they respond to]) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 23) per physician's orders. This deficient had the potential to result in the delay of the appropriate instructions needed from the physician to prevent infection and hospitalization. Findings: A review of Resident 23's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 23 on 7/3/2023 with diagnoses including dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough), personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA - a temporary blockage of blood flow to the brain), and cerebral vascular accident (CVA- Stroke) without residuals, and hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure). A review of Resident 23's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-09 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide outside services as required by physician orders in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled Referral to Outside Services revised on 12/1/2013, by failing to refer one of four sampled residents (Resident 6) to an audiologist (a healthcare professional that specializes in evaluating and treating hearing problems, like hearing loss). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services for Resident 6. Findings: A review of Resident 6's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 6 on 11/23/2024 with diagnoses including dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough), generalized weakness (a feeling of weakness in most parts of the body), and adult failure to thrive (a noticeable decline in health). A review of Resident 6's physician order dated 11/23/2024, indicated audiology (a medical study of hearing and balance, and treatment of related disorders) consult with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional and comfortable environment for one of six sampled residents (Resident 4), by failing to ensure the exit pathway was clear of geriatric (relating to old people, especially with regard to their healthcare) recliner chairs (geri-chair - large, padded chairs with wheeled bases, and are designed to assist seniors with limited mobility) and clutter. This failure had the potential to place Resident 4 at risk of fire hazards injury and accidents. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 4 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including pneumonia (lung infection that inflames air sacs with fluid or pus), acute respiratory failure (condition in which your blood does not get enough oxygen or has too much carbon dioxide), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) following cerebral infarction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents' (Resident 22) enteral feeding (refers to any method of feeding that uses the gastrointestinal (stomach/intestines) tract to deliver nutrition and calories) bottle was changed after 24 hours. This deficient practice had the potential for the residents to develop tube feeding associated complications such as infection. Findings: During record review, Resident 22's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 22 on 10/9/24 with diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (CVA-stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and heart failure (a disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling). During record review, Resident 22's Requires Tube Feeding care plan, initiated 10/9/24, indicated the resident had dysphagia. The care plan indicated a goal was for the resident to not have side effects or complication related to tube feeding. The interventions indicated staff were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care services for one of three sampled residents (Resident 30), by failing to ensure the nasal cannula (NC -a connector attached to oxygen) tubing and humidifier (a device used to make supplemental oxygen moist) for oxygen (O2) therapy was changed per facility's policy. This deficient practice had the potential to cause complications associated with oxygen therapy. Findings: During record review, the admission Record indicated Resident 30 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including acute bronchospasm (a sudden narrowing of the airways [bronchi] in the lungs, caused by the contraction of muscles lining the airways), pulmonary embolism (a blood clot gets stuck in an artery in the lung, blocking blood flow to part of the lung), Type II Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure to label an open date of one of five sampled residents (Resident 19)'s ipratropium-albuterol inhalation solution (used to prevent and treat difficulty breathing, wheezing, shortness of breath, coughing, and chest tightness) inhalation solution that can expire once opened with an open date according to manufacturer guidelines. 2. Ensure Resident 30's medications were not left unattended at the bedside. These deficient practices had the potential to compromise the therapeutic effectiveness of the stored medications and cause unintended accident concerning medication use. Findings: 1. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 19 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (a chemical imbalance in the blood affecting the brain), type II Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly store one of five sampled residents (Resident 43)'s levalbuterol (used to prevent or relieve the wheezing, shortness of breath, coughing, and chest tightness caused by lung disease) inhalation solution medication that expires once opened according to manufacturer guidelines. This deficient practice had the potential to compromise the therapeutic effectiveness of the stored medications given to the residents because of inappropriate storage of medications. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure (condition in which your blood does not get enough oxygen or has too much carbon dioxide), congestive heart failure (CHF-a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling) and acute kidney failure (a condition in which the kidneys suddenly can't filter waste from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including the provision of routine antibiotics as ordered for one of the three sampled residents (Resident 1) as per physician ' s order dated 10/11/2024 at 9:48 pm for Ciprofloxacin HCI (hydrochloride) Otic (relating to or located in the region of the ear) Solution (Ciprofloxacin HCI - is a fluoroquinolone antibiotic that kills bacteria by blocking a protein they need to reproduce and repair themselves) due to suspected ear infection. for had swelling and discharge to the right ear on 10/11/2024. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving the ordered antibiotic for 2 days resulting in redness, swelling, severe pain (right side of face), and a cream-colored wiggling foreign body in the right ear which required the resident be transfer to General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) on 10/20/2024. Findings: During a review of the admission record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) by not allowing one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) to return to the facility from [DATE] to [DATE] after hospitalization. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 remaining at the hospital longer than necessary and had the potential to affect the resident ' s psychosocial wellbeing. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure (condition in which your blood does not get enough oxygen or has too much carbon dioxide), hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of the history and physical (a term used to describe a physician's examination of a patient. In an H&P, the physician obtains a thorough medical history from the patient, performs a physical examination, and then documents their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services based on comprehensive (complete) individualized assessments and physician's orders necessary to maintain the highest practical well-being for two of five sampled residents (Resident 5 and Resident 30). By failing to: 1. Notify Resident 5's physician of the need for a follow up (repeat) Chest Xray (CXR - imaging test that looks at the lungs, heart, and ribcage) due to resident position on 12/11/2023. 2. Notify Resident 5's physician of abnormally high monocytes (white blood cells - [WBC] cells that help fight infections in the body) count of 17.6 percent (% -unit of measure. Reference range [RR] normal value was between 2.0 % to 8.0 %) on 12/12/2023. 3. Ensure Resident 5 received Levofloxacin (antibiotic - medication used to treat infection) 500 milligrams (mg - unit of measurement) give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for cough for seven days, to be started on 12/29/2023 as per physician's order. The Levofloxacin was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and treatment for urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in the drainage system for removing urine) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 30) by failing to: 1. Collect a urine sample from Resident 30 on 12/17/2023 for urinalysis (UA - urine test used to check for infection or kidney problems) and culture and sensitivity (C&S -a test to diagnose germs such as bacteria or fungus [yeast or mold] per physician's orders. The urine sample was not collected until 12/20/2023. 2. Notify Resident 30's physician of abnormal positive for bacteria UA & C&S results on 12/20/2023. The physician was not notified until 12/25/2023. 3. Ensure Resident 30 received Ertapenem (used to treat certain serious infections) 1gm (gm -unit of measure) intravenously (IV - inside a vein [blood vessel]) daily for 10 days, starting 12/25/2023 as per physician's order. These deficient practices resulted in Resident 30 not receiving treatment for a UTI…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the licensed nurse had the skills and knowledge to collect a urine sample for one of three sampled residents (Resident 30). As a result, the facility delayed in collecting urine sample for urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in any part of the urinary system [the kidneys (organs in the body that filter waste materials out of the blood and pass them out of the body as urine, regulates blood pressure and the levels of water, salts, and minerals), ureters (Tube/s that carry urine from the kidneys to the bladder [Hollow organ that stores urine]), bladder and urethra [The tube that leads from the bladder and transports and discharges urine outside the body]) by 3 days for Resident 30. Placing the resident at risk for sepsis (a life-threatening infection in the blood that travels throughout the entire body), organ failure, and death. Cross Reference F727, F755 & F684 Findings: A review of Resident 30's admission Record indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-19 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to a Registered Nurse for at least eight (8) consecutive hours a day, seven (7) days a week to ensure that Resident 30's clinical needs were met. As a result, Resident 30 did not receive Ertapenem (Antibiotic - prevent bacterial infections) 1gram (gm - Unit of measure) intravenous (IV - inside a vein) to treat urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in any part of the urinary system [the kidneys (organs in the body that filter waste materials out of the blood and pass them out of the body as urine, regulates blood pressure and the levels of water, salts, and minerals), ureters (Tube/s that carry urine from the kidneys to the bladder [Hollow organ that stores urine]), bladder and urethra[The tube that leads from the bladder and transports and discharges urine outside the body]). Cross Reference F684, F690, F755 Findings: A review of Resident 30's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call light (also known as call cord, used in communicating remotely with staff to alert a staff of the need for any type of assistance) was within reach for one (1) out of 15 sampled Residents (Resident 11). This deficient practice had the potential for the resident not being able to reach staff for assistance when needed for activities of daily living (ADLs) such as hydration and toileting, which could lead to delay of care and accidents including falls. Findings: A review of Resident 11's admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of, but not limited to, displaced fracture of second cervical vertebra (bone break in the neck portion of a person's spine), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), muscle weakness, and a history of falling. A review of Resident 11's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment and screening tool), dated 10/30/2023, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' medical records were updated to show documentation that advance directives (Written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) were discussed and written information were provided to the residents and/or responsible parties for four of 24 sampled residents (Residents 2, 24, 29, 30, and 95). This deficient practice violated the residents' and/or the representatives' right to be fully informed of the option to formulate their advance directives and had the potential to cause conflict with the residents' wishes regarding health care for Residents 2, 24, 29, 30, and 95. Findings: A review of Resident 29's admission Record, indicated Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of neck of left femur (a break in the thigh bone), acute kidney failure (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow through with the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR- a federally required screening to help identify individuals with possible serious mental illnesses requiring a specialized follow up evaluation) recommendation to obtain a PASARR II (assessment that determines if resident's mental condition could be met in the nursing facility or if the individual requires specialized services) evaluation for one of three sampled residents (Resident 30). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inappropriate placement and unidentified specialized services for Resident 30. Findings: A review of Resident 30's admission Record indicated Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder in which the body does not produce enough or respond normally to insulin [a hormone that lowers the level of glucose) causing blood sugar [glucose] levels to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement an individualized person-centered plan of care with measurable objectives, timeframe, and interventions to meet one of five sampled residents (Resident 29's) specific needs, by failing to: 1. Develop an individualized/person-centered care plan with goals and interventions for Resident 29's antidepressant (medication that helps calm the feelings of depression) medication. 2. Develop an individualized/person- centered care plan with goals and interventions to address Resident 29's risk for skin breakdown. These deficient practices had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services. Findings: A review of Resident 29's admission Record, indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with medical history including fracture of neck and a fractur of the left femur (a break in the thigh bone), acute kidney failure (a condition in which the kidneys can't filter waste from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcers (PU: damage to the layers of the skin caused by prolonged pressure on a part of the body; stage 1: red, warm to touch, stays red when pushed down on, stage 2: break in top layer of skin, stage 3 crater-like appearance damage to top layers and fat layers, stage 4: damage to all layers of skin, including muscle, bone may be visible) care and treatments as per physician's order for two of five sampled residents (Resident 29 and Resident 33). These deficient practices placed Resident 29 and Resident 33 at risk for worsening skin conditions, delay in healing of existing and complications resulting from untreated or improperly treated pressure ulcers which could result in systemic infections that could lead to death. Findings: a. A review of Resident 29's admission Record, indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with medical history including fracture of neck of left femur (a break in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to maintain mobility (ability to move) for two of five sampled residents (Resident 9 and Resident 30) with rehabilitation (restoring function) and mobility concerns, by failing to: 1. Apply Resident 9's left-hand splint (a long, firm object used as a support for a broken bone so that the bone stays in a particular position while it heals) as per physician's order. 2. Ensure a soft neck collar brace was applied to Resident 30 as per physician's order. This deficient practice placed Resident 9 and Resident 30 at risk for a decline in mobility and contractures (occurs when soft, connective tissue [skin, muscles, tendons, ligaments] in the body becomes very stiff and/or shortened). Findings: a. A review Resident 9's admission record indicated Resident 9 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including periorbital cellulitis (an infection of the eyelid), lack of coordination, muscle wasting and atrophy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post in a visible and prominent place daily the actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staffing directly responsible for resident care per shift. This deficient practice resulted in the actual staffing information not being readily accessible and available to residents and visitors. The deficient practice had the potential to cause inadequate staffing. Findings: During an observation on 1/16/2024 at 2:00 p.m., a projected, not an actual DHPPD (Direct Care Services Hours Per Patient Day) was observed posting in the main entrance of the facility. During an observation on 1/17/2024 at 2:00 p.m., a projected, not an actual DHPPD (Direct Care Services Hours Per Patient Day) was observed in posting the main entrance of the facility. During an observation on 1/18/2024 at 11:00 a.m., a projected, not an actual DHPPD (Direct Care Services Hours Per Patient Day was observed in posting the main entrance of the facility. During an interview with the director of nursing (DON) on 1/19/2024 at 2:00 a.m., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pneumonia (PNA-lung infection) vaccine was offered and/or re-offered to one (1) of six (6) sampled residents (Resident 6) per facility policy and as ordered. This deficient practice placed Resident 6 at risk of acquiring and transmitting pneumonia infection. Findings: A review of Resident 6's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement), type 2 diabetes (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), lack of coordination, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with thinking), dysphagia (inability to swallow), chronic kidney disease (is a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should), myopathy (muscle disease), protein-calorie malnutrition (decreased dietary intake), acute embolism (a blockage of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0912 — isolatedProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet (sq. ft. -unit of measure) per resident in three (3) out of (23) resident rooms. Those three rooms consisted of two and/or three beds each. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate useable living space for the residents and working space for the staff. Findings: A review of the Request for Room Size Waiver letter, dated 1/19/2024, submitted by the Administrator, indicated there are eight rooms not meeting the requirement of 80 square feet per resident according to federal regulation. The letter indicated that the room sizes would not interfere with the daily nursing care or safety of the residents. The letter also indicated there would be enough space to provide for each resident's care, dignity and privacy in those rooms which are in accordance with the special needs of the residents. The letter further indicated the spaces would not have an adverse effect on the residents' health and safety or impede the ability of any resident in the rooms to attain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1.Residents' notice of proposed transfer/discharge's notification was sent to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (public advocate) on a timely manner for one of four sampled residents, Resident 5 2. The documentation was completed and recorded the reasons for the transfer or discharge in the resident ' s medical record for one of four sampled residents, (Resident 7). This deficient practice denied the residents additional protections from being inappropriately discharged for Resident 5 and an incomplete documentation of the discharge process for Resident 7. Findings: A. A review of the admission Records indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged to home on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), fibromyalgia (a condition that causes pain all over the body, sleep problems, fatigue,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe and effective discharge for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). Resident 1 who was discharged home on 8/1/23, the facility failed to ensure home health services (medical care that can be provided at home) and durable medical equipment (DME, medical equipment and supplies ordered by a healthcare provided for routine and long-term use) were arranged as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 not provided the necessary care and health services needed after discharge from the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 6/13/23 with diagnoses including fracture of the left femur (break in the thigh bone), osteoarthritis of the hip (inflammation of the hip causing pain, swelling) and difficulty in walking. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, standardized care and screening tool) dated 6/20/23 indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 23 resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]) had at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident bedrooms. This failure had the potential to have an adverse effect on the health, movement and safety of staff and eight of the nine residents (Residents 3, 9, 15, 16, 18, 20, 39, 46) in rooms [ROOM NUMBER]. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview on 4/14/2026 with Residents 9, 39, and 46 in room [ROOM NUMBER] at 11:36 AM, 11:42 AM, and 11:58 AM respectively, Residents 9, 39, and 46 stated they had no problems with their room and that there was enough space in the room for their personal belongings and for them to move around. During an observation and concurrent interview on 4/14/2026 with Residents 15, 16, and 18 in room [ROOM NUMBER] at 11:43 AM, 11:47 AM, and 12:09 PM respectively, Residents 15, 16, and 18 stated there are no problems with their room and that there is enough space in the room for their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-09 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet (sq. ft. -unit of measurement for space) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms for three (3) of 23 resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate usable living space for all the residents and working space for the health caregivers, which could affect the quality of care and the quality of life for the residents. Findings: A review of the Request for Room Size Waiver letter submitted by the Administrator, dated 2/9/2025, indicated three (3) resident rooms in the facility do not meet the requirement of at least 80 square feet per resident per federal regulation. The letter also indicated the rooms do not pose any kind of risk to the care and services the facility provides to the residents. Each room has access to the outside and provides ample sunlight and ventilation. The following rooms provided are less than 80 sq.ft. pr resident: Room # Room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES — 40 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5 of 5 | 2.5 | +2.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.4 | +1.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
The other 39 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/18/2024 |
| ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/25/2025 |
| RAMIN, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2021 |
| WEISS, MESHULEM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/04/2024 |
| WEST PICO TERRACE WELLNESS GP LLC | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/15/2014 |
| RECHNITZ, SHLOMO | Individual | LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/01/2014 |
| WEST PICO-LET LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/04/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $417K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055119. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.