No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Bloomfield Center For Nursing & Rehabilitation

355 Park Avenue, Bloomfield, CT 06002 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (860) 242-8595 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0603) — most recent May 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 24% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
355 Park Ave · (860) 242-8595 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
341 Cottage Grove Rd · (860) 243-8351 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
33 Granby St · (860) 242-5954 · Call to confirm hours
Park
330 Park Ave · (860) 242-8935 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.0%18.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.6%6.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms84.7%22.3%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.4%3.5%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.7%16.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.5%17.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.2%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.4%4.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.4%24.7%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.5%17.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.2%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine74.1%69.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.6%24.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.4%10.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.842.061.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.161.461.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 73 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 38% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.9%CMS range 46.8–72.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.4%CMS range 6.8–14.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge73.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 3.8–13.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.43
RN hours/ resident / day
0.83
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.06
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.32
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
33.0%
Total nursing turnover
35.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 111.4 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.32 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-19)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2022-12-20)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for community provider appointments, the facility failed to ensure a preoperative order directing to hold a blood thinner for forty-eight (48) hours prior to the scheduled procedure was transcribed correctly resulting in the medication being administered the day prior to and the morning of the procedure, the resident was transported to the appointment and then subsequently the procedure was cancelled due to the error. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (lack of bladder control due to brain, spinal cord or nerve problems), recurrent urinary tract infections, and atrial fibrillation. A December monthly physician's order directed to administer Eliquis (a blood thinner) oral 5 milligram tablet (mg) by mouth twice daily. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for community provider coordination, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record to include communication with the provider regarding preoperative instructions. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (lack of bladder control due to brain, spinal cord or nerve problems), recurrent urinary tract infections, and atrial fibrillation. A December monthly physician's order directed to administer Eliquis (a blood thinner) oral tablet 5 milligrams (mg) by mouth twice daily. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of fifteen (15) out of fifteen (15) indicating Resident #1 was alert and oriented. The nurse's note dated 12/4/25 at 2:38 PM identified a call was received from the hospital's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 4 sampled residents, (Resident #97), reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to ensure the resident's body was not exposed while being transferred in the hallway following a shower. The findings include: Resident # 97's diagnosis included quadriplegia, diabetes, and feeding difficulties. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #97 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment, and was totally dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, eating, and bathing. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/3/25 identified an Activities of Daily Living (ADL)deficit related to quadriplegia, spinal stenosis, and muscle weakness. Interventions included total dependence on 1 staff for bathing and showering and was totally dependent on 2 staff for repositioning and turning in bed. Observation on 5/12/2025 at 12:27 PM identified Resident # 97 being wheeled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 6 sampled residents, (Resident #60), reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was exposed to a communicable illness was free to exit their room when wearing appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). The findings include: Resident #60's diagnoses included quadriplegia, congestive heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #60 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating intact cognition, was dependent with personal hygiene and rolling left and right, and used a motorized wheelchair. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/29/2025 identified Resident #60 required assistance with activities of daily living. Interventions included using a mechanical lift for transfers, using 2 staff for turning and repositioning, and use of a motorized wheelchair for locomotion. A nurse progress note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 2 sampled residents, (Resident# 97, Resident #102), reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), for Resident #97, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive Resident Care Plan (RCP) for the use of a 24-hour positioning plan and specialized communication needs, and for Resident #102, failed to ensure the RCP reflected a dental problem for a resident with dental issues. The findings include: 1. Resident #97's diagnosis included quadriplegia, diabetes, and feeding difficulties. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #97 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment, spoke Spanish, required an interpreter, had a limitation in range of motion in both upper and lower extremities, and was totally dependent on staff for ADL's. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) in effect from 1/1/2025 through 5/15/2025 failed to identify the 24-hour…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents, (Resident # 96), reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to update the Resident Care Plan (RCP) with interventions to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer when the resident became more dependent on staff, and for 1 of 3 sampled residents, (Resident #104), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to update the Residents Care Plan (RCP) after unwitnessed falls. The findings include: 1. Resident #96's diagnoses included severe protein calorie malnutrition, vascular dementia and difficulty walking. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #96 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 indicating severe cognitive impairment, required supervision with bed mobility, supervision with transfers, and supervision ambulating. Additionally, Resident #96 was at risk for skin breakdown and had no current pressure areas. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical records, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #2) reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to ensure a portable oxygen cylinder was stored in a safe manner. The findings include: Resident #2 diagnoses included chronic obstructive, obstructive pulmonary disease, respiratory failure, and congestive heart failure. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating no cognitive impairment, required supervision with bed mobility, maximal assistance with lower body dressing, and partial moderate assistance to sit on the side of the bed. The Resident Care Plan Conference (RCC) dated 5/15/2025 identified Resident #2 had emphysema related to a history of smoking. Interventions directed staff to monitor for symptoms of dyspnea on exertion, monitor for signs and symptoms of respiratory infection, and administer oxygen as ordered. Observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of facility policy for the only sampled resident, (Resident #60), reviewed for Activities, the facility failed to provide activities that met the needs of a resident with a physical impairment. The findings include: Resident #60's diagnoses included quadriplegia, congestive heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #60 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating intact cognition, was dependent with personal hygiene and rolling left and right, and used a motorized wheelchair. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/29/2025 identified Resident #60 would maintain involvement in cognitive stimulation and social activities. Interventions included inviting him/her to the scheduled activities and provide him/her with an activity calendar. An interview with Resident #60 on 5/13/2025 at 9:34 AM identified he/she was upset that there are no options for recreation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #32 and Resident #76) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to perform weekly skin checks as ordered, failed to perform weekly pressure ulcer risk assessments, failed to ensure the dietician conducted a nutritional assessment for a resident with a pressure ulcer, and for Resident #76, failed to develop a comprehensive care plan. The findings include: 1. Resident #32 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes, chronic kidney disease, dementia and congestive heart failure. The admission baseline Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/26/2025 identified a potential for skin breakdown. Interventions included dietician evaluation/interventions as needed, skin checks with care for changes, report changes to the nurse, turn and reposition every 2 to 3 hours and as tolerated, and weekly skin evaluations. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #32 had a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #2) reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to ensure a portable oxygen cylinder was stored in a safe manner to prevent a potential hazard, for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #60) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to follow physician orders to transfer a resident to the Emergency Department following an accidental occurrence in a dependent resident, and for 1 of 3 residents, (Resident #93) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to provide a side rail assessment and evaluation prior to using side rails resulting in an injury. The findings include: 1. Resident #2 diagnoses included chronic obstructive, obstructive pulmonary disease, respiratory failure, and congestive heart failure. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating no cognitive impairment, and required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 45 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 residents, (Resident #95), reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to obtain daily weights for a resident with Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) per the physician's order. The findings include: Resident #95 was admitted to the facility in July of 2024 with diagnoses that included hypertension, Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), and diabetes. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #95 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment, and required maximum assistance for toileting, personal hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers. A Resident Care Plan (RCP) in effect for the month of December 2024 identified Resident #95 with a potential for altered cardiac status related to CHF and hypertension. Interventions included monitoring changes in lung sounds on auscultation (i.e. crackles) and evaluating respiratory status for signs of shortness of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #66) reviewed for hydration, the facility failed to ensure the correct intravenous solution was administered per the physician's order. The findings include: Resident #66's diagnoses included dementia, acute kidney failure, and malnutrition. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #66 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment, and was independent with eating and bed mobility, required supervision with transfers, and once standing could ambulate 150 feet independently. The Resident Care Plan dated 5/1/2025 identified Resident #66 was at risk for dehydration secondary to infection and poor PO (by mouth) intake. Interventions included peripheral IV fluids, staff were directed to administer IV medications per MD order, and to monitor signs and symptoms of dehydration. APRN #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #90) reviewed for hemolytic treatment, the facility failed to follow a fluid restriction for a resident on hemolytic treatment. The findings include: Resident #90 was admitted to the facility in April of 2025 with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease, dependence on renal hemolytic treatment, congestive heart failure (CHF) and anemia. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #90 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 14 indicating no cognitive impairment, required substantial/maximum assistance for personal hygiene and bed mobility, was dependent on toileting and transfers and was receiving hemolytic treatment. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) in effect for April and May 2025 identified Resident #90 was on hemolytic treatment due to end stage renal failure. Interventions included checking and changing the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #46) reviewed for medication administration, the facility to ensure medications that had been dispensed and were going to be administered were safely stored. The findings include: Resident #46 was admitted to the facility in July of 2024 with diagnoses that included hypertension, congestive heart failure (CHF), and diabetes. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated MDS 5/2/2025 identified Resident #46 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment, and was independent for eating, required moderate assistance with personal hygiene, and maximum assistance for toileting transfers. A Resident Care Plan in effect for the month of May of 2025 identified Resident #46 with Potential for altered cardiac status related to CHF and hypertension. Interventions included monitoring changes in lung sounds on auscultation (i.e. crackles), evaluating respiratory status: signs of dyspnea (shortness of breath), dyspnea on exertion,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical records, staff interviews, and policy review for 1 of 2 sampled resident, (Resident #60), reviewed for infection control, the facility failed to ensure staff wore the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when providing resident care. The findings include: Resident #60 was admitted in April of 2024 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure, and quadriplegia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #60 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating intact cognition, was dependent with personal hygiene and rolling left and right and used a motorized wheelchair. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/29/2025 identified Resident #60 had COPD. Interventions included monitoring for signs and symptoms of respiratory insufficiency and to monitor/document/report any signs and symptoms of respiratory infection. Nurse progress notes dated 5/7/2025 identified Resident #60 was on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, reviews of facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews for three (3) sampled residents (Residents #1, #2, and #3) who were reviewed for misappropriation of funds, the facility failed to ensure funds from the residents' accounts were not withdrawn and misappropriated without the resident's knowledge or approval. The findings include: 1. Resident #1's diagnoses included schizophrenia and major depressive disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was alert and oriented to person, place, time and situation. The social worker note dated 4/4/25 at 1:00 PM identified Resident #1 reported that he/she went to the front desk on 4/4/25 to withdraw funds and was informed the balance was twenty-six (26) dollars. Resident #1 reported that he/she withdrew twenty dollars ($20) and his/her balance at that time should have been one hundred and sixty-six dollars and fifteen cents (166.15) and after the withdrawal it should have been one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility policies and procedures, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for an allegation of staff to resident abuse, the facility failed to ensure a staff member would not retaliate towards the resident. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included bipolar disorder and vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating Resident #1 was alert and oriented to person, place and time, was independent with most Activities of Daily Living and utilized a walker as an assistive device. The nurse's note dated 1/23/25 at 1:14 PM identified Resident #1 reported an incident had occurred with a nurse aide and the nurse aide stated, if Resident #1 hits her, she was going to hit Resident #1 back. The Facility Reported Incident report dated 1/23/25 at 12:00 PM identified Resident #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for an allegation of staff to resident abuse, the facility failed to ensure a witnessed allegation of verbal abuse was reported within two (2) hours to the Administrator or designee. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included bipolar disorder and vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating Resident #1 was alert and oriented to person, place and time, was independent with most Activities of Daily Living and utilized a walker as an assistive device. The nurse's note dated 1/23/25 at 1:14 PM identified Resident #1 reported an incident had occurred with a nurse aide and the nurse aide stated, if Resident #1 hits her, she was going to hit Resident #1 back. The Facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from abuse. The findings include: 1) Resident #2's diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of the frontal lobe (cancerous brain tumor), epilepsy (seizure disorder), anxiety disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of fifteen (15) indicative of intact cognition, exhibited no behaviors, and required moderate assistance with bed mobility and was dependent on staff with transfers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/23/24 identified that Resident #2 has a behavior problem including accusatory behaviors related to malignant neoplasm of the frontal lobe with interventions that included to have two (2) caregivers at all times, encourage the resident to express…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for two (2) of three (3) residents (Resident #1 and #2) reviewed for mistreatment, the facility failed to ensure the State Agency was notified of allegations of abuse/neglect timely. The findings include: 1. Resident #1's diagnoses included a fracture of the right fibula (the outer shin bone), congestive heart failure and muscle weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of fourteen (14) indicative of intact cognition and required maximal assistance with bed mobility and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/12/24 identified that Resident #1 had bladder incontinence with interventions that included to check the resident every two (2) to three (3) hours for incontinence and clean the peri-area with each incontinence episode. Interview with Person #1 on 12/20/24 at 10:10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for two (2) of three (3) residents (Resident #1 and #2) reviewed for abuse and neglect, the facility failed to provide evidence that allegations of abuse and/or neglect were thoroughly investigated in accordance with facility policy. The findings include: 1. Resident #1's diagnoses included a fracture of the right fibula (the outer shin bone), congestive heart failure and muscle weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of fourteen (14) indicative of intact cognition and required maximal assistance with bed mobility and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/12/24 identified that Resident #1 had bladder incontinence with interventions that included to check the resident every two (2) to three (3) hours for incontinence and clean the peri-area with each incontinence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to follow the resident's plan of care directing to provide two (2) caregivers at all times. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of the frontal lobe (cancerous brain tumor), epilepsy (seizure disorder), anxiety disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of fifteen (15) indicative of intact cognition, exhibited no behaviors, and required moderate assistance with bed mobility and was dependent on staff with transfers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/23/24 identified that Resident #2 has a behavior problem including accusatory behaviors related to malignant neoplasm of the frontal lobe with interventions that included to have two (2) caregivers at all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for incontinent care, the facility failed to complete a bladder evaluation on admission for a resident admitted to the facility with urinary incontinence. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included a fracture of the right fibula (the outer shin bone), congestive heart failure and muscle weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of fourteen (14) indicative of intact cognition and required maximal assistance with bed mobility and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene. Additionally, the MDS reported that Resident #1 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/12/24 identified that Resident #1 had bladder incontinence with interventions that included to check the resident every two (2) to three (3) hours for incontinence and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for two (2) of three (3) residents, (Resident #1 and #2), reviewed for mistreatment, the facility failed to ensure the residents were provided social services support timely after an allegation of abuse/neglect. The findings include: 1. Resident #1's diagnoses included a fracture of the right fibula (the outer shin bone), congestive heart failure and muscle weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of fourteen (14) indicative of intact cognition and required maximal assistance with bed mobility and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/12/24 identified that Resident #1 had bladder incontinence. Interventions included to check the resident every two (2) to three (3) hours for incontinence and clean the peri-area with each incontinence episode. Interview with Person #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for three (3) of four (4) sampled residents (Residents #2, #3, and #4) who were reviewed for resident-to-resident physical abuse, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not have physical contact with Residents #2, #3, and #4. The findings include: 1. Resident #1's diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, anxiety, and psychotic disorder with delusions. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had short- and long-term memory deficits, had not exhibited any behaviors in the past seven (7) days, was independent with ambulating, and received antipsychotic, antianxiety, and antidepressant medications. The Resident Care Plan dated 9/12/24 identified Resident #1 had an altered thought processes and the potential to become physically aggressive due to a history of aggression towards another resident and dementia. Interventions directed to provide one (1) to one (1) support as needed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who was recently readmitted , the facility failed to update the Resident Care Plan when the resident returned from the hospital to include the hospitals' recommendation for wound care and a non-weight bearing status of the right foot. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes with foot ulcer, amputation right great toe, end stage renal disease on dialysis, acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of right lower extremity, osteomyelitis. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had no memory recall deficits, made reasonable decisions regarding tasks of daily life and had an infected diabetic foot ulcer that required dressings changes. The Resident Care Plan dated 8/19/24 identified Resident #1 had a self-care deficit and a potential for skin breakdown. Interventions directed to utilize pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents #1 and #2) who required wound care, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for the wound care they were providing and for Resident #2 the facility failed to follow professional wound care standards by not dating and timing the dressing when changed daily. The findings include: 1. Resident #1's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes with foot ulcer, amputation right great toe, end stage renal disease on dialysis, acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of right lower extremity, osteomyelitis. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had no memory recall deficits, made reasonable decisions regarding tasks of daily life and had an infected diabetic foot ulcer that required dressings changes. The Resident Care Plan dated 8/19/24 identified Resident #1 had a self-care deficit and a potential for skin breakdown. Interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident #3) who had severe contractures of the bilateral elbows and hands, the facility failed to ensure the proper application of a splint in accordance with the physician's order. The findings include: Resident #3's diagnoses included subarachnoid hemorrhage, seizures, and contractures of the bilateral hands and elbows. A physician's order dated 7/17/24 directed to trial bilateral hand splints by the Occupational therapist. The Resident Care Plan dated 7/18/24 identified Resident #3 had a self-care deficit and was dependent on staff for assistance with all activities of daily living and an alteration in skin integrity. Interventions directed dietary evaluation as needed, monitor for signs of infection, follow physician orders, and weekly wound rounds until resolved. Upon further review, the resident care plan failed to reflect documentation Resident #3 had bilateral hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility's policy review, and interviews for two of three residents (Resident #1 and Resident #3) reviewed for care and services, the facility failed to ensure consults were obtained in accordance with physician orders. The findings include: 1. Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included dementia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis after a stroke, depression, and bell's palsy. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment. A Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/17/2023 identified Resident #1 was a long-term resident and had impaired cognition and communication. Interventions directed to monitor lab/diagnostic work as ordered and to report results to MD, following up as needed. Further record review identified Resident #1 had a Power of Attorney for financial and medical decisions. A physician's order dated 7/17/2023 directed to obtain a follow up consultation with gastroenterology in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the State Agency was notified timely of an allegation of mistreatment. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included femur fracture, Peripheral Vascular Disease, benign neoplasm of the brain and depression. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severely impaired cognition, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/15/2023 identified a communication problem. Interventions directed to anticipate and meet needs, ensure/provide a safe environment, speak on an adult level, speak clearly and slower than normal. Interview with the Administrator on 12/26/2023 at 12:54 PM identified on 11/29/2023 Resident #1's family member reported the roommate's family informed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive investagation was completed timely after an allegation of mistreatment. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included femur fracture, Peripheral Vascular Disease, benign neoplasm of the brain and depression. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severely impaired cognition, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/15/2023 identified a communication problem. Interventions directed to anticipate and meet needs, ensure/provide a safe environment, speak on an adult level, speak clearly and slower than normal. Interview with the Administrator on 12/26/2023 at 12:54 PM identified on 11/29/2023 Resident #1's family member reported the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #3) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the physician, the DON and the local police were notified timely when a resident eloped from the facility. The finding included: Resident #3's diagnoses included Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease. Clinical record review identified Resident #3 had a court appointed Conservator of Person. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had impaired cognition for decision making, was independent with transfers and ambulation. Review of an elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had was not at risk for elopement. Review of progress notes for the period of 7/1 to 7/12/2023 identified that the resident had no exit seeking behaviors. a. Review of a nurse's note dated 7/13/2023 identified that at approximately 2:00 AM the front door alarm was sounding and when staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #2), reviewed for a change in condition, the facility failed to ensure neurological assessments were completed timely after resident fall. The findings include: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility during 12/2020 with diagnoses that included syncope and collapse, and dementia. The nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 was independent with transfers and ambulation. Fall risk assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 was a high risk for falls with interventions that directed appropriate footwear when ambulating. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/6/2020 identified Resident #2 had an ADL self-care performance deficit and was at risk for falls. Interventions directed limited assistance of staff for transfers and that the resident was independent to walk, and to use appropriate footwear when ambulating. Facility incident report form dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #41) reviewed for a hemolytic treatment, the facility failed to ensure notification to the physician/APRN concerning refusal of medications, in order to have the opportunity to alter the times of administration for missed medication. The findings include: Resident # 41's diagnoses include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, end stage renal disease, and Diabetes Mellitus with neuropathy. A Resident Care Plan dated 1/16/22 and updated quarterly identified the need for dialysis related to renal failure. Interventions included to change the access dressing at dialysis, coordinate meals, snacks, medications, therapy and treatments in accordance with dialysis days (Monday, Wednesday and Friday). The annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #41 had intact cognition, required supervision with set up help for bed mobility and transfers. The MDS further identified Resident #41…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interview for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #23, 157, and 158) reviewed for advance directives, the facility failed to ensure the resident's wishes regarding advance directives was discussed, addressed and documented timely, per facility policy. The findings include: 1. Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes. The nurses note dated [DATE] at 4:11 PM identified Resident #23 had arrived in a private car to the facility around 12:30 PM accompanied with his/her conservator. Review of the admission physician's orders failed to reflect a code status. A physician's note dated [DATE] at 1:00 AM identified, in the past, in the event of cardiopulmonary arrest, Resident #23 requested cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) be performed. The care plan dated [DATE] identified in the event of a cardiopulmonary arrest, the residents code status was (full code) meaning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #38 and 79) reviewed for abuse, for Resident #38, the facility failed to protect the resident from sexual abuse, and for Resident #79, the facility failed to protect the resident from abuse. The findings include: 1. Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, left hand contracture, late onset Alzheimer's and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Court of Probate paperwork dated 7/3/19 identified the following for Resident #89, Conservator of Estate was terminated, and the Conservator of Person (COP) shall remain. Resident #89 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, schizoaffective disorder depressive type and moderate cognitive impairment with independent mobility. A nurse's note dated 7/29/21 at 1:36 PM identified Resident #38 was observed entering Resident #89's room and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #45 and 79) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to report the allegations of abuse according to facility policy and established timeframes. The findings include: 1. Resident #45 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included diabetes and osteomyelitis. A physician's order dated 9/19/22 directed to get Resident #45 out of bed via a mechanical lift to an adaptive power wheelchair with pelvic positioning belt to maintain upright posture. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #45 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance for personal hygiene, dressing, toileting, bed mobility, and transfers. Further, the MDS identified Resident #45 was occasionally incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel and used a motorized wheelchair. The care plan dated 10/27/22 identified Resident #45 was dependent on staff for meeting physical needs.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #45) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse in a timely manner. The findings include: Resident #45 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included diabetes and osteomyelitis. A physician's order dated 9/19/22 directed to get Resident #45 out of bed via a mechanical lift to an adaptive power wheelchair with pelvic positioning belt to maintain upright posture. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #45 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance for personal hygiene, dressing, toileting, bed mobility, and transfers. Further, the MDS identified Resident #45 was occasionally incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel and used a motorized wheelchair. The care plan dated 10/27/22 identified Resident #45 was dependent on staff for meeting physical needs. Interventions included all staff to converse with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #45) reviewed for participation in care planning, the facility failed to ensure the resident was able to attend and participate in the care plan meetings on a quarterly basis. The findings include: Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes and osteomyelitis. The significant change MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #45 had intact cognition. The care plan dated 6/8/22 identified Resident #45 was independent for meeting emotional, intellectual, and social needs. Interventions included to invite resident to scheduled activities. Additionally, establish a pre discharge plan with Resident #45 and evaluate progress and revise plan. Interview with Resident #45 on 12/14/22 at 9:01 AM indicated he/she has not been invited to the quarterly care plan meetings and is not told when or where they occur. Resident #45 indicated he/she would attend and would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #8) reviewed for edema, the facility failed to ensure the compression stockings were applied daily per the physician's order, and for 2 residents (Resident #23 and 59) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure neurological assessments after a fall were completed per facility policy, for 1 resident (Resident #38) reviewed for glucose monitoring, the facility failed to ensure the resident did not get unnecessary fingersticks for blood sugar, and for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #47) reviewed for urology services, the facility failed to follow the physician order and book a urology consultation in a timely manner. The findings include: 1. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included diabetes, hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A physician's order dated 4/15/22 directed to apply compression stockings in the morning at 6:00 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policy and interview for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #87) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate settings for a low air loss (LAL) mattress, failed to monitor for function and placement of the LAL and failed to notify the Dietitian when Resident #87 developed a pressure ulcer. The findings include: Resident #87's diagnoses included dysphagia, dementia without behavioral disturbance, adult failure to thrive and protein calorie malnutrition. A Resident Care Plan dated 4/11/22 identified Resident #87 being at increased risk of skin breakdown secondary to compromised nutritional status, poor po (food by mouth) intake, decreased ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL's), decreased mobility and decreased level of consciousness. Interventions included a pressure reducing mattress, avoid constrictive clothing, offloading of the heels per a physician order and dietary supplements as ordered. The annual MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #45) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the mechanical lift was in good repair prior to use resulting in the lift tipping over with the resident in it. The findings include: Resident #45 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included diabetes and osteomyelitis. The significant change in condition MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #45 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance for personal hygiene, dressing, toileting, bed mobility, and transfers. Additionally, the resident had 5 stage 2 pressure ulcers. A reportable event form dated 6/11/22 at 10:50 AM indicated that the mechanical lift tipped over while Resident #45 was being transferred and the resident landed on the floor. A statement by NA #1 indicated the resident was in the mechanical lift, and it tipped over to the left and fell. A statement by NA #5 identified she and NA #1 were using…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, review of the clinical record and facility policy for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #58 and Resident #87) reviewed for weight loss, the facility failed to notify the Dietitian when nutritional supplements were omitted because they not available (Resident #58 and Resident #87) and failed to complete quarterly nutritional assessments per facility policy for Resident #87. The findings include: 1. Resident #58's diagnoses included cerebral vascular disease, dementia, glaucoma, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, and diabetes. The Resident Care Plan dated 5/23/22 identified a problem with being at risk for altered nutrition related to a diagnosis of diabetes, dietary restrictions of low concentrated sweets, no added salt diet, mechanically altered diet due to dysphagia and total dependence for eating. Interventions included Glucerna supplements as ordered, provide and serve diet as ordered, monitor intake and record every meal, monthly weights, Registered Dietician (RD) to evaluate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses had the specific competencies and skill sets to care for residents including competencies in IV therapy, and the facility failed to ensure nurse aides demonstrated competency in mechanical lift transfers. The findings include: 1. Interview with (Staff Development) ADNS on 12/14/22 at 2:02 PM and review of facility documentation failed to reflect documentation that licensed nurses and nurse aides had been provided competency training in intravenous therapy (IV) for the year 2022. Interview with the DNS on 12/14/22 at 5:59 PM identified he was not aware that the licensed nurses and nurse aides did not have yearly education, in-service, and competencies for IV therapy for the year 2022. The DNS indicated he was under the impression that the ADNS was providing the in-service and competency for the IV therapy. Interview with (Staff Development) ADNS on 12/14/22 at 6:02 PM identified that since she has been in the ADNS/Staff Development position she has been working as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews the failed to ensure a mechanical lift was in safe operating condition and maintenance checks were completed per facility policy and manufacturer recommendations. The findings include: Interview with the Director of Maintenance on 12/20/22 at 1:30 PM indicated he was made aware when the mechanical lift had tipped over and Resident #45 fell to the floor and indicated that lift was broken and was removed. The Director of Maintenance could not remember what was broken on the lift and because the lift is gone, could not be observed. The Director of Maintenance indicated many times the nurse aides complained about the lift wheels not moving but every time he looked at that lift, he never found anything wrong with the wheels. The Director of Maintenance indicated all those types of lifts are discontinued and the facility has 2 machines for parts in the maintenance area. The Director of Maintenance indicated he would check every mechanical lift for safety every Friday and if nursing had a problem with a lift the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary, comfortable, and homelike environment. The findings include: Observations on 12/21/19 at 11:00 AM through 12:20 PM and 12/22/19 at 2:20 PM with the Director of Maintenance and the Administrator identified the following: 1. Damaged, chipped and/or marred bedroom walls on C unit in rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 11, 15, 19, 20, and 23. 2. Damaged and/or brown stains on bedroom ceiling tile on C unit in rooms 1, 4, 5, 9, 18, and 23. 3. Damaged and/or brown stains on bathroom ceiling tile on C unit in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. 4. Damaged, broken and/or bent window blinds in bedroom on C unit in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. 5. Dirt, dirt particles, webs and/or stains identified on C unit bedroom window in room [ROOM NUMBER]. 6. Damaged, broken and/or stain radiator cover in bedroom on C unit in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. 7. Dirt and/or stains on bathroom hand railing on C unit in rooms 4, 5, Bathing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and interview, for one of two residents, (Resident #67), reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure weekly skin monitoring was completed per facility policy. The findings include: Resident #67's diagnoses include cerebral infarction and respiratory failure. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #67 required total assistance of two staff with Activities of Daily Living (ADLS) and no pressure ulcers. A quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #67 with a stage 3 pressure ulcer. The resident care plan dated 8/2/19 identified Resident #67's skin was intact and the resident was at risk for future breakdown. The care plan dated 9/26/19 identified Resident #67 with a stage 3 pressure ulcer of the coccyx. Review of the weekly skin integrity check sheets from 9/2019 to 12/24/19 identified sheets were not completed for the months of 9/2019, 11/2019, and 12/2019, (10/2019 sheets were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-12-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interview, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a clean and sanitary manner. The findings include: During a tour of the kitchen on 12/21/19 at 10:29 AM with the Director of Nursing the following was identified: 1. The juice station bottom shelf was noted with a moderate amount of stains and/or debris. 2. Underneath the juice station the floor was noted with debris. 3. One muffin pan was noted on floor underneath the steamer station. 4. The steamer bottom shelf was noted with debris. 5. The spice shelf was noted to have spice debris, debris and/or dust. 6. The convection oven compartment had an accumulation of grease film and/or dry food debris. 7. The grill was noted with dried stains. 8. The hot plate warmer was noted with stains and/or debris. 9. Four food carts were noted with clean trays and was noted with stains and/or food debris. 10. The refrigerator with milk and thickened liquids was noted with stains on the inside panel and/or bottom shelf. 11. The dry food storage room floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and interviews, for one of five Residents (Resident #50) observed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored and administered according to manufacturer's and pharmacy's guidelines. The findings include: Resident #50 had diagnoses including an eating disorder. A current physician's order identified that Resident #50 was to receive Lactinex one packet twice a day. On 12/22/19 at 10:37 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) #1, was observed administereing medications. RN #1 was preparing medicaitons for Resident #50 and retrieved from the third drawer of the medication cart, the medication Lactinex Granules, prepared it, and administered the Lactinex Granules to Resident #50. The drawer not not noted to be refrigerated. Review of the box containing the packets of Lactinex Granules was noted with a clear label reading Keep Refrigerated. At 10:55 AM on 12/22/19, at 10:55 AM when asked when and where he/she retrieved the box of Lactinex Granules, RN #1 identified he/she did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, facility policy, and interview during a tour of the facility, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment and an environment free of pests. The findings include: Observations on 5/14/2025 at 10:55 AM through 5/14/2025 at 11:25 AM identified the following: 1. On the A Wing, dirty trays were noted on the counter and fruit flies were noted in Resident #102's room. 2. On the C Wing the carpets were noted to be brown and stained yellow, and brown, and red in front of the nurse's station. Interview and observation with the Housekeeping Supervisor on 5/14/2025 at 11:24 AM identified although the pest control provider had been in the building to treat fruit flies in another resident's room, there were still fruit flies in Resident 102's room. The Housekeeping Supervisor indicated that although spot and steam cleaning of the carpet had been completed last week, carpet stains were still present. The Housekeeping Supervisor was unable to provide any documentation that carpet cleaning had been performed the previous week. Further, the Housekeeping…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-05-19 · tag F0637 — pattern
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents, (Resident #96), reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to identify and complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for a resident with a decline in status. The findings include: Resident #96 's diagnoses included severe protein calorie malnutrition, vascular dementia, and difficulty walking. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #96 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 indicating severe cognitive impairment, and required supervision with bed mobility, supervision with transfers, and supervision ambulating. Additionally, Resident #96 and was at risk for skin breakdown but had no current pressure areas. Review of the Physical Therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE] through 3/18/2025 identified Resident #96 required partial/moderate assistance with bed mobility, required partial moderate assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-05-19 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for the only sampled resident, (Resident #22), reviewed for Resident Assessment and for 1 of 2 sampled residents, (Resident #102), reviewed for Activities of Daily Living the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. The findings include: 1.Resident #22 's diagnoses included schizophrenia, encephalopathy and morbid obesity. Review of the clinical record identified Resident #22 had a level II PASRR outcome document on file. Review of the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #22 was positive for a PASRR level II assessment. Review of the annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #22 was coded as no, indicating that there was no level II PASRR (a change from the 6/26/2024 assessment). Interview with the Director of Social Work on 5/15/2025 at 11:09 AM identified that the MDS dated [DATE] should have had the same coding as the MDS dated [DATE]. The Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-05-19 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #45 and Resident #60) reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a Level 1 PASRR and failed to subsequently submit for a Level 2 PASRR evaluation with an inaccuracy or a change in diagnosis. The findings include: 1. Resident #45 was admitted to the facility in 5/2018 with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #45 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating intact cognition, experienced feeling down, depressed or hopeless half or more than half the days in a 2 week time period and failed to be coded to indicate that a level II PASRR evaluation had been completed. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/24/2025 identified Resident #45 required monitoring for psychotropic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2022-12-20 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interview for 1 resident (Resident #47) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to provide written notice of the bed hold policy to the resident and/or the resident's representative when the resident was transferred and admitted to the hospital. The findings include: Resident #47 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included renal and urethral obstruction, retention of urine, and diabetes. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #47 had intact cognition. Resident #47 was admitted to the hospital 11/10/22 after a fall at the facility and was readmitted 4 days later on 11/14/22. Review of the clinical record failed to reflect that the resident and/or the resident representative had been provided written notice of the bed hold policy when Resident #47 was transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. Interview with SW #1 on 12/20/22 at 1:35 PM identified a bed hold policy was not provided to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2019-12-24 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, and interviews for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #30 and Resident #67) reviewed for hospitalizations, the facility failed to ensure the facility state representative (ombudsman) was notified of a hospital transfer. The findings include: a. Resident #30 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hydronephrosis, Type II diabetes, and cerebral infarction. A review of the clinical record identified Resident #30 was admitted to an outside hospital from [DATE] to 6/3/19 for diagnoses and treatment for hydronephrosis related to neurogenic bladder. b. Resident #67 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction. Resident #67 was discharged to the hospital on 9/24/19, 11/25/19, and 12/3/19 and readmitted to the facility after each discharge. Interview with Social Worker #1 (SW #1) on 12/24/19 at 8:45 AM indicated the Social Worker was notifying the ombudsman of hospital transfers/discharges up to a couple of months ago but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES — 42 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
The other 41 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Brentwood Center For Health & Rehabilitation, LLCYarmouth, ME 1 of 5The Pines At Utica Center For Nursing And RehabUtica, NY 2 of 5Beacon Brook Center For Health & RehabilitationNaugatuck, CT 2 of 5Eastside Center For Health & Rehabilitation, LLCBangor, ME 2 of 5Kennebunk Center For Health & Rehabilitation, LLCKennebunk, ME 2 of 5Ludlowe Center For Health & RehabilitationFairfield, CT 2 of 5Mansfield Center For Nursing And RehabilitationStorrs Mansfield, CT 2 of 5Montowese Center For Health & RehabilitationNorth Haven, CT 2 of 5Riverside Health & Rehabilitation CenterEast Hartford, CT 2 of 5Shady Knoll Center For Health & RehabilitationSeymour, CT 2 of 5Summit At Plantsville Center For Health & RehabiliPlantsville, CT 2 of 5The Pines At Catskill Center For Nursing & RehabCatskill, NY 2 of 5The Pines At Glens Falls Ctr For Nursing & RehabGlens Falls, NY 3 of 5Augusta Center For Health & Rehabilitation, LLCAugusta, ME 3 of 5Cambridge Health And Rehabilitation CenterFairfield, CT 3 of 5Evergreen Center For Health & RehabilitationStafford Springs, CT 3 of 5Glastonbury Center For Health & RehabilitationGlastonbury, CT 3 of 5Hebrew Center For Health And RehabilitationWest Hartford, CT 3 of 5Laurel Ridge Center For Health & RehabilitationRidgefield, CT 3 of 5Maefair Center For Health & RehabilitationTrumbull, CT 3 of 5Marlborough Health & Rehabilitation CenterMarlborough, CT 3 of 5Reservoir Center For Health & Rehabilitation, TheMarlborough, MA 3 of 5Water's Edge Center For Health & RehabilitationMiddletown, CT 3 of 5Winship Green Center for Health & Rehab, LLCBath, ME 4 of 5Bethel Health Care CenterBethel, CT 4 of 5Brewer Center For Health & Rehabilitation, LLCBrewer, ME 4 of 5Dover Center For Health & RehabilitationDover, NH 4 of 5Huntington Hills Center for Health and RehabilitatMelville, NY 4 of 5Pines At Bristol For Nursing & Rehabilitation, TheBristol, CT 4 of 5Sharon Center For Health & RehabilitationSharon, CT 4 of 5Stone Bridge Center For Health & RehabilitationNewtown, CT 4 of 5The Pines At Poughkeepsie Ctr For Nursing & RehabPoughkeepsie, NY 4 of 5The Pines at Rutland Center for Nursing & RehabiliRutland, VT 4 of 5Village Crest Center For Health & RehabilitationNew Milford, CT 5 of 5Belair Care Center IncBellmore, NY 5 of 5Maple View Health & Rehabilitation CenterRocky Hill, CT 5 of 5Milford Health And Rehabilitation CenterMilford, CT 5 of 5Norway Center For Health & Rehabilitation, LLCNorway, ME 5 of 5Pine Heights at Brattleboro Center for Nursing & RBrattleboro, VT 5 of 5Regency House Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterWallingford, CT

Showing 40 of 41; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
EDSR ASSOCIATES, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 09/10/2021
SENGA TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 09/10/2021
ELABA, WILFREDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2020
GILMARTIN, THOMASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2016
GREEN, CARLENEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/11/2024
OSTREICHER, MARVINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/19/1999
BARRY BOKOW 2012 FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/07/2020
BLOOMFIELD HEALTH CARE REALTY OF CONNECTICUT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/18/1998
BPB VENTURES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/07/2020
CEDAR HILL NG TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/14/2025
JUNIPER NG TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/14/2025
MARVIN OSTREICHER FAMILY TRUST 2012OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/10/2021
NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2001
OAK DRIVE NG TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/14/2025
PREFERRED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2003
PREFERRED THERAPY SOLUTIONS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2008
ROLLING HILL NG TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/14/2025
SUSAN OSTREICHER FAMILY TRUST 2012OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/10/2021
ALMEIDA, ELIZABETHIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2008
BOKOW, BARRYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2008
BOKOW, MICHAELIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/30/2015
LOPIANSKY, REBECCAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/14/2025
OSTREICHER, DAVIDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/14/2025
OSTREICHER, MARCIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/14/2025
OSTREICHER, SUSANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2003
STEG, SHAYNAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/14/2025
ZITTER, KENNETHIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/10/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 27 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.3M
Related-party expense24% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 83%Medicare 6%Other / private 11%

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$365per resident / day
operating cost
$11,092per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$369per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Connecticut
$15,208/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,118/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075138. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next