Eastside Center For Health & Rehabilitation, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 165 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 69 beds and averages 64.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.23 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.27 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.77 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.37 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.39 to 0.97 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-02-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, facility policy review, and record review, the facility failed to monitor a resident's bowel movements and initiate the Bowel Regime protocol on shift 7 for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident # [R] 46). This failure resulted in R46 not having a bowel movement for an additional 16 shifts which resulted in R46 screaming out for help and crying because of the pain due to gas buildup and constipation. Findings: The facility's policy, Bowel Regime last revised 3/23 indicated: - Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) is responsible for accurate documentation of bowel moments in Point Click Care (PCC) [electronic medical record]. - The Licensed Nurse reviews the PCC Clinical Alerts daily for residents in need of the bowel regime. -Residents will have an Medical Doctor (MD) order that reads as follows unless otherwise specified by a healthcare provider: Milk of Magnesium (MOM) 30 cubic centimeter (cc) by mouth (PO) as needed (PRN) if no bowel movement (BM) after six shifts; Dulcolax suppository 10 milligrams per rectum (PR) PRN/ if MOM ineffective; Fleet Enema…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policy and procedures for residents to file grievances to ensure timely resolution to resident concerns. This has the potential to affect all residents. Findings: 1. The facility's Grievance Policy, revised 11/16, indicated the following: The resident/responsible party can bring forward their concerns verbally and or by the writing grievance process. Grievance/concerns forms are available on the nursing units and in the front lobby where applicable. Facility staff Is encouraged to attempt to resolve the verbal grievance/concern at the time it is brought forward whenever possible. in the case that a concern cannot be resolved promptly the staff member will complete the grievance form or give it to the person with the concern to complete. Upon receive of the completed form, the social worker will follow up with the person who filed the grievance/concern and discuss the resolution and have the complainant sign and or verbally acknowledge that they agree that the issue has been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to recognize a potential significant weight loss and a potential significant weight gain for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident #12 [R12])On 3/30/26, a review of R12's clinical record was complete. R12 was care planned for diabetes with an intervention to monitor, document/report any signs or symptoms of weight loss . R12 also had a care plan problem for overweight/obesity/risk of malnutrition related to chronic disease (diabetes mellitus Type II) with an intervention to monitor/evaluate weight/weight changes.Documentation indicated that on 3/5/26, R12 weighed 294 pounds (#). Then on 3/12/26, R12 weighed 263 #'s, indicating a potential for a significant weight loss of 30.6 #.On 3/16/26, R12 weighed 266.1 #'s. Then on 3/26/26, R12 weighed 310.2 #'s, indicating a potential for a significant weight gain of 44.1 #'s.There was no evidence that the care plan interventions were followed, that potential significant weight changes were assessed for accuracy and/or evaluated for potential medical intervention.On 3/31/26…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-01 · tag F0711 — pattern
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the attending Provider signed the medication Order Review History Report (Physician block orders) that is required during a visit at least every 60 days plus a 10 day grace period for 3 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident #2 [R2] R9, R46) and 2 of 3 reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (R6 and R14) In addition, the facility failed to ensure the attending Provider signed the medication Order Review History Report (Physician block orders) that is required during a visit for a new admission at least every 30 days plus a 10 day grace period for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for hospitalization (Resident #58 [R58]). Finding: 1. On 3/31/26, a review of R2's clinical record was completed. Documentation indicated a required regulatory visit was completed on 1/15/26. A provider progress note was completed on 1/15/26, but there was no evidence that the physician block orders were signed. The facility was unable to provide evidence that the physician block orders were signed on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that plastic scoops were not left in the flour and sugar bins, in the walk in refrigerator the facility failed to prevent cross contamination when they had a plastic container with lettuce leaves, bag of carrots, unpeeled cucumber and an onion wrapped in plastic wrap all in the same container on 1 of 4 days of survey (3/29/26) in addition the facility failed to ensure all kitchen staff were wearing facial hair restraints on 2 of 4 days of survey (3/29/26 and 3/30/26). Findings: On 3/29/26 at 10:55 a.m. during the initial tour of the kitchen an observation of the flour and sugar bins showed the scoops were left in the flour and sugar bins. On 3/29/26 at 10:57 a.m. during the initial tour of the kitchen, the surveyor observed that the cook did not have his facial hair restraint on completely leaving his mustache uncovered while performing food preparation tasks. This observation was confirmed with the cook at the time of the observation.On 3/29/26 during lunch meal tray service the dietary aide was observed preparing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the State mental health authority for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was notified after a resident was admitted with a diagnosed and/or experienced symptoms related to a mental disorder or trauma event to determine if a change in level of service was required for 1 of 1 sampled residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #8 [R8]).Finding:On 3/31/26, R8's clinical record was reviewed. Documentation indicated that R8 was admitted with a PASRR Level I screening that did not include R8's active diagnoses of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) or anxiety disorder. The clinical record lacked evidence that the resident was referred to the State mental health authority for a new PASRR determination.On 3/31/26 at 11:44 a.m., during an interview with a surveyor and the Director of Nursing Services (DNS), R8's medical record and PASRR were reviewed. At this time the surveyor confirmed with the DNS that the clinical record lacked evidence that R8 was resubmitted for a PASRR determination to include R8's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed and implemented to address the needs of a resident to minimize triggers that may cause re-traumatization for 1 of 1 resident(s) reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (Resident #8 [R8]).Finding:On 3/31/26, R8's clinical record was reviewed and indicated that R8 was admitted with an active diagnosis of Chronic Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). R8's Initial assessment indicated R8 had experienced physical/emotional trauma that is triggered by certain sounds. The clinical record lacked evidence that interventions were put in place to prevent re-traumatization.On 3/31/26 at 11:44 a.m., during an interview with the surveyor and the Director of Nursing Services (DNS), R8's medical record was reviewed. The DNS confirmed with the surveyor that the care plan does not address PTSD to include goals, or interventions to prevent re-traumatization.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to assist a resident with scheduling a follow-up appointment for Eye Care or assist the resident to obtain new eyeglasses when they were lost for 1 of 1 resident(s) reviewed for vision and hearing (Resident #3 [R3]).Findings:On 3/29/26 at 10:53 a.m., during an interview with a surveyor, R3 stated he/she cannot see without his/her glasses, and they have been missing for approximately 3 weeks. R3 stated that nursing staff and the Administrator looked for them, but R3 does not know if there is a plan to find or replace them.On 3/30/26 at 2:21 p.m., during an interview with a surveyor, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated R3's glasses have been missing for a while. She stated there was a screw that had come out of one of the hinges and would not go back in. The CNA stated she thought R3 went to the eye doctor recently. The appointment book was reviewed with the CNA. On 2/3/26, R3's Eye Care appointment was crossed off with a note stating Will need to reschedule. Call to reschedule when glasses are found. The book was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, facility policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that staff followed Enhanced Barrier Precautions during a pressure ulcer dressing change for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #32 [R32]).Finding: The facility's policy, Precautions to Prevent Infection, revised 6/24, indicated that Enhanced Barrier Precautions requires gown and glove use for certain residents during specific high-contact resident care activities that included those with indwelling medical devices and/or wounds, even if the resident is not known to be infected or colonized with a Multi-Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO). The high contact care activities list included wound care and dressing change for pressure injuries On 3/29/26, R32's clinical record was reviewed, and indicated on 3/25/26, a Medical Provider observed and documented that R32 had an unstageable pressure ulcer on the spine. On 3/31/26, R32's care plan for the care area of the resident has a pressure injuries mid back was updated to include Enhanced Barrier Precautions and to don (apply) gloves and gown when performing high…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean/sanitary environment on 1 of 1 days of survey (12/30/25). This has the potential to effect all residents.Findings:On 12/22/25 at 8:00 a.m., the State of Maine, Division of Licensing and Certification received an anonymous complaint including an allegation that there was standing water in the basement.On 12/30/25 at 12:12 p.m., during the environmental tour 2 surveyors and the Regional Director of Clinical Operations observed and confirmed the presence of standing water in a basement storage room located below the kitchen and in the basement space located below resident rooms.On 12/30/25 at 12:40 p.m., during an interview with a surveyor, the Maintenance Director stated the standing water located in the storage closet is from water leaking in from the loading dock (connected to the kitchen), and the water traveled down through the wall to the storage room.On 12/30/25 at 3:00 p.m., during an interview with a surveyor, the Maintenance Director stated the water in the basement below the resident rooms is from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, by not storing food in a sanitary manner and not maintaining a clean kitchen floor for 1 of 1 days of survey (12/30/25).Findings:On 12/30/25 at 11:25 a.m., during a tour of the kitchen and food storage, a surveyor and the Food Service Director observed and confirmed the following:-In the meal prep area food debris was observed on the floor under kitchen surfaces and shelves that was not associated with the current meal service.-Behind the stove a large pile of food debris was observed on the floor against the wall with cooking utensils partially buried in the debris.-In dry food storage area across from the walk-in freezer, loose fries and a biscuit were observed on the floor.-In the walk-in freezer, food debris was observed on the floor including a fish filet and loose fries, an open box containing packages of green beans was stored on the floor, and boxes of hamburger patties, chicken breasts, and creamer were observed to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$11,190 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $11,190 — penalty dated 2025-02-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES — 42 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 39 rows in the source record cover these 32 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ME