Shady Knoll Center For Health & Rehabilitation
41 Skokorat Street, Seymour, CT 06483 · For profit - Corporation · 128 certified beds · (203) 881-2555 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (23% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.9% | 18.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.1% | 6.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 54.1% | 22.3% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.4% | 3.5% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.9% | 16.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.9% | 17.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.1% | 93.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.6% | 4.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.8% | 24.7% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 21.4% | 17.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 27.6% | 69.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.2% | 24.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.7% | 10.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.57 | 2.06 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.72 | 1.46 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 99 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 49.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.1%CMS range 38.4–58.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.7%CMS range 8.2–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 49.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 47.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 52.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.0%CMS range 3.2–9.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.96 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 119.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication errors, the facility failed to ensure medication was administered in accordance with physician orders, and failed to ensure staff read the manufacturer label prior to administering a medication, resulting in a medication error. The findings include: Resident #1 had a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Physician order dated 6/4/2025 directed to administer Methotrexate (immunosuppressive drug use to treat rheumatoid arthritis) subcutaneous solution auto-injector 10 milligrams (mg)/0.4 milliliters (ml). Inject 25 mg subcutaneously every Tuesday. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating he/she was alert and oriented. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/10/2025 identified Resident #1 had arthritis. Interventions directed to administer medications as ordered. Facility incident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication errors, the facility failed to ensure a medication was labeled correctly when received from the pharmacy, resulting in a medication error. The findings include: Resident #1 had a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Physician order dated 6/4/2025 directed to administer Methotrexate (immunosuppressive drug use to treat rheumatoid arthritis) subcutaneous solution auto-injector 10 milligrams (mg)/0.4 milliliters (ml). Inject 25 mg subcutaneously every Tuesday. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating he/she was alert and oriented. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/10/2025 identified Resident #1 had arthritis. Interventions directed to administer medications as ordered. Facility incident report dated 6/18/2025 identified Resident #1 received the wrong medication dose. APRN #1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-30 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the 1st quarter Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) report was submitted. The findings include:Review of the [NAME] 1st Quarter (10/1/24 through 12/31/24) PBJ Staffing Data Report identified there were no submittals for Registered Nurse hours and for licensed nursing coverage 24 hrs./day for 10/1/24 through 10/10/24.An interview with the Administrator on 6/30/25 at 9:43 AM and 6/30/25 at 2:30 PM identified the former owners of the facility were responsible for nursing staff PBJ submissions and failed to complete transmissions 10/1/24 through 10/10/24 as an oversight before the change of ownership which was effective 10/10/24.Although a policy for PBJ submission was requested, none was provided.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, staff interviews, facility documentation, and facility policy for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #31) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to follow physician orders timely and initiate treatment orders for a newly identified wound. The findings include:Resident #31's diagnoses included unspecified dementia, chronic kidney disease, and essential hypertension.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #31 was severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for shower/bathing, lower body dressing, and putting on/taking off footwear.Review of a skin condition binder located on the 3rd floor identified on 4/28/25 a new skin issue/concern for Resident #31 was identified on the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift as a right heel open area and that the on-call Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) and supervisor were notified.An on-call APRN progress note dated 4/28/25 at 6:17 PM identified Resident #31 had a chief complaint of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy and staff interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #93) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to review and respond to pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner. The findings include:Resident #93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, anxiety, and hypertension.A physician's order dated 12/10/24 directed to administer Citalopram Hydrobromide (Celexa) (an antidepressant medication) 40 milligrams(mg) 1 tablet by mouth once a day.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #93 was severely cognitively impaired, dependent on bathing, dressing, and toileting. Also identifying Resident #93 required maximal assistance for personal and oral hygiene and was receiving an antidepressant medication. The Pharmacy medication review dated 12/12/24 identified Resident #93 was receiving Citalopram (Celexa) 40 mg per day and noted Celexa was no longer recommended to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a temperature meal tray sample taken with the Dietary Director and staff/resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure meals was served at appropriate temperatures.During the Resident Council meeting on 6/24/25 at 1:34 PM, residents complained of ongoing issues with food being served cold. On 6/25/25 at 12:35 PM, a test tray was conducted. The following was identified:The lunch meal was plated and left the Dietary Department on a variety of serving carts which were two tiered and open to air starting at 11:45 AM which were filled with 7 to 8 meals on each serving cart, plated and covered with a clear plastic lid with a hole in the center. Dietary Aides transferred meal trays to the third floor first, returning after the serving carts were emptied to refill with meals plated in the kitchen, then returned to the units to finish serving. The food temperature log was reviewed with all foods identified at appropriate temperatures for each item on the steam table. The test temperature tray was plated at 12:35 PM and brought up to the second-floor unit at 12:40 PM. One Nurses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the tour of the Dietary Department, staff interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure opened items were labeled and dated when opened, and expired food was discarded. The findings include:Tour of the Dietary Department on 6/23/25 at 9:55 AM during the initial walk through with the Dietary Director identified the following:a. A large bag of Ciabatta Garlic bread sticks opened, not dated, located in the walk-in freezer.b. 4 (gallon sized) opened freezer bags of frozen chicken wings observed in the walk-in- freezer were not dated when opened.c. 1 (1 pound) bag of coconut half full, not dated and open to air located in the dry storage room.d. 1 (24-ounce) package of powdered gravy mixed which was opened and dated 1/21/25 in the dry storage room which was not sealed closed.e. 11 individual 0.98-ounce packages of oatmeal not in the original box (which identified the expiration date) with no expiration date noted.An interview with the Dietary Director on 6/23/25 at 10:00 AM identified that all food that was opened should be labeled with a date when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #33) reviewed for mistreatment, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of rushed and rough care which potentially caused a left hand bruise was thoroughly investigated. The findings include:Resident #33's diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, anxiety, and chronic idiopathic constipation.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #33 was moderately cognitively impaired, had no physical/verbal symptoms directed toward others, and had no behavior of rejection of care. The MDS assessment also identified Resident #33 was dependent for toileting hygiene and required substantial/maximal assistance with lower body dressing and bed mobility.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/5/25 identified Resident #33 had the potential for verbal aggression related to mental/emotional illness, poor impulse control, and was inclined to yell and scream at the staff.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #44) reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), the facility failed to ensure a PASRR Level II assessment was completed following an exempted short term approval for a resident with a suspected serious mental illness. The findings include: Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bipolar disorder.A Notice of PASRR Level I screen outcome dated 3/5/25 identified Resident #44 had a suspected or had been diagnosed with a serious mental illness and received a 7 day emergency short term post hospital discharge approval for Level I. Recommendations included a re-screen for Level I screen and, as necessary, a Level II evaluation on or before the 7th day if the individual was to remain in the nursing facility.The discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident # 44) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive care plan was developed for a resident with a recent history of smoking/vaping and issues with smoking contraband. The findings include: Resident # 44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, and failure to thrive.A Hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] identified Resident #44 was transferred to the facility on 3/1/25 following hospitalization, had a prior history of vape use, and recent tobacco use which included smoking a 1/2 pack of cigarettes (10 or more cigarettes) per day.The nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] at 9:47 PM identified that Resident #44 had an unknown history of smoking or tobacco use.A nursing note dated 3/1/25 at 10:00 PM identified Resident #44 was found to have 2 vape devices in his/her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #103) reviewed for choices, the facility failed to support a resident's choice related to assistance with oral care. The findings include:Resident #103 had diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis)and hemiparesis (muscle weakness) following a stroke affecting the left side, Moyamoya disease, and cognitive communication deficit.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #103 was moderately cognitively impaired and the behavior of rejection of care was not exhibited. The MDS assessment also identified Resident #103 required setup or clean-up assistance with oral hygiene, was dependent with personal hygiene, and required substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 5/27/25 identified Resident #103 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) care and mobility related to a significant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #35) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure that weekly weight monitoring was completed timely. Additionally, for 1 of 5, (Resident #44) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL), the facility failed to re-evaluate the continued use of mobility equipment and plan of care for its continued use following the removal of a motorized chair. The findings include:1.Resident # 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and heart failure.A hospital Inter-Agency Referral (W-10) document dated 4/2/25 identified Resident #35 was hospitalized from [DATE] to 4/2/25 for acute and chronic respiratory failure. The hospital documentation identified that Resident #35 was discharged to the long-term care facility on 4/2/25 with medication orders to continue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident # 44) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure that a resident with recent history of tobacco use was assessed for smoking upon admission and re-admission to the facility; and failed to ensure that the resident was free of smoking materials within the facility; and failed to ensure interventions were in place following the identification of smoking/vaping materials within the facility. The findings include:Resident # 44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), diabetes, and failure to thrive. A hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] identified Resident #44 was transferred to the long term care facility on 3/1/25 following hospitalization. The hospital discharge summary further identified Resident #44 had a prior history of vape use, and recent tobacco use which included smoking a 1/2 pack of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #67) reviewed for choices, the facility failed to ensure a meal was provided according to preference and served in a timely manner. The findings include:Resident #67 had diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease and calculus of the gallbladder.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #67 was cognitively intact and independent with eating.The Resident Care Plan dated 5/19/25 identified Resident #67 with a nutritional diagnosis of obesity with limited mobility. Interventions included providing the diet as ordered and honoring the resident's food/beverage preferences.Physician orders dated 5/30/25 directed a 2 gram (GM) Sodium (2 GM Na+) diet, regular texture with thin (no thickening agent required) consistency fluids.An interview with Resident #67 on 6/23/25 at 11:04 AM identified he/she cannot have salt or milk as it caused…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, staff interviews, and facility policy for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #102) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL), the facility failed to refer resident to physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) after identifying a decline in ADLs. The findings include:Resident #102's diagnoses included unspecified Alzheimer's disease, functional quadriplegia, and weakness.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #102 was severely cognitively impaired and required setup or clean-up assistance with eating, supervision or touching assistance with oral hygiene, and partial to moderate assistance with personal hygiene.The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #102 was severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for eating, oral hygiene, and personal hygiene (a decline from the 1/29/25 quarterly MDS).The Resident Care Plan dated 5/19/25 identified Resident #102 had a deficit in self-care related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for dialysis, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a missed dialysis treatment timely. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included end stage renal disease. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident # 2 was alert and oriented and required dialysis. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/4/2022 identified that Resident #2 required hemodialysis. Interventions directed resident requires dialysis three (3) times per week, and facility to provide/schedule transportation. A physician order dated 12/27/2022 directed dialysis days: Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, AMR ambulance pick up at 10:10 AM via wheelchair to dialysis center. The nursing note dated 12/28/2022 at 4:31 AM identified the dialysis center called and indicated that since Resident #2 was positive for COVID-19, Resident #2 would need…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for dialysis, the facility failed to ensure transportation was scheduled timely for a resident who required dialysis treatments, and failed to maintain a dialysis communication book for a resident who required dialysis treatments. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included end stage renal disease. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident # 2 was alert and oriented and required dialysis. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/4/2022 identified that Resident #2 required hemodialysis. Interventions directed resident requires dialysis three (3) times per week, and facility to provide/schedule transportation. A physician order dated 12/27/2022 directed dialysis days: Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, AMR ambulance pick up at 10:10 AM via wheelchair to dialysis center. The nursing note dated 12/28/2022 at 4:31 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for two of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for ADLs, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was complete and accurate to include oral care provided and/or refused. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and a cognitive communication deficit. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition and required set up assistance with oral hygiene. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/9/2024 identified Resident #1 had forgetfulness/confusion at times due to dementia and Parkinson's. Interventions directed allow the resident to make daily decisions about clothing, daily care, meal alternatives, offer support/reassurance as needed. Review of nurse aide care card dated/revised 4/5/2024 directed set up for personal hygiene. Review of May 2024 ADL flowsheet indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility documentation, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for a change in condition, (Resident #1), the facility failed to notify the physician of a decline in a resident's oral intake. The findings included: Resident #1's diagnoses included diffuse traumatic brain injury, and hemiplegia. Review of the Care Card dated 7/27/23 identified Resident #1 was a total feed. Review of the Quarterly Diet Nutrition Evaluation dated 12/18/23 identified that the resident required an estimated fluid need of 1975 milliliters (ml) to 2370 ml per day. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had sever cognitive impairment and was dependent with eating. The Resident Care Plan dated 1/9/24 identified Resident #1 as at risk for dehydration related to fluid volume deficit, at increased nutritional risk due to mechanically altered diet, dysphagia, and required staff to feed at meal time with interventions that directed to monitor intake…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews of the third floor call bell system, the facility failed to ensure that the call bell system was audible at the call bell panel at the nurse's station and could be heard throughout the nursing unit. The findings include: Tour of the third floor on 4/16/24 at 9:45 AM identified that rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] call lights were lit up and blinking above the door, however, the call bell had no audible sound and could not be heard. Observation of the nurse's station where the call bell system panel was located identified that the rooms where the call bells were activated were lit up on the system, however there was no sound coming from the system panel. When standing by the medication room, adjacent from the nurses station, a faint call bell sound could be heard, although the the sound was not loud enough to be heard on the nursing unit. Interview with the Administrator at the time of the observation identified that the call bell should be ringing at the nurse's station loud enough to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of job descriptions, and interviews, for 5 of 5 units, the facility failed to ensure the environment was maintained in good repair and in a homelike manner. The findings include: Observation on 10/18/23 at 2:55 PM through 3:08 PM identified the following. a. Damaged, chipped, holes, stains, and/or marred bedroom walls on Magnolia C unit in rooms 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 207, 210, and 212. Magnolia B unit in rooms 215, 216, 218, 220, 222, and 224. Magnolia A unit in rooms 226, 227, 233, and 234. [NAME] B unit in rooms [ROOM NUMBER]. [NAME] A unit in rooms [ROOM NUMBER]. b. Damaged, and stains on the bedroom ceiling tiles on [NAME] A unit in room [ROOM NUMBER]. c. Damaged, chipped, stains, and/or marred bedroom radiators on [NAME] A unit in rooms 328, and 333. Willow B unit Lounge: Damaged, chipped, holes, stains, and/or marred walls. Damaged, and stains on the ceiling tiles. Third floor exit door to the elevator corridor: Damaged, stains, and/or marred on door. Interview on 10/18/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-18 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that licensed staff maintained their Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) certification. The findings include: Review of facility documentation identified 6 licensed personnel currently have expired CPR certifications. Interview with the DNS [DATE] at 10:40 AM regarding CPR certification identified 6 licensed personnel currently have expired CPR certifications. The DNS indicated it is her expectation that licensed personnel maintain CPR certifications and identified she would reach out to a CPR facility to have someone come in and train the unlicensed staff as soon as possible. The DNS also indicated there would be a CPR certified supervisor on each shift until all certification matters have been resolved. Although requested a policy on CPR was not provided.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #59 and 119) reviewed for diabetes management, the facility failed to follow the physician's order for elevated blood sugars, and for 5 residents (Resident #37, 55, 66, 85, 87) reviewed for accidents and behaviors, the facility failed to monitor vital signs according to facility policy, and for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #106) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to ensure vital signs were monitored in accordance with the facility's policy. The findings include. 1. Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, dementia, and anxiety disorder. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #59 had severely impaired cognition, was independent with eating, and had received daily Insulin injections during the last seven days. The care plan dated 9/15/23 identified Resident #59 had Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that kitchen equipment was clean and sanitary, failed to ensure the chemical sanitizing solution was maintained at the manufacturer recommended sanitization concentrations, and failed to ensure that food items stored for the emergency 3-day supply were within use by date perimeters. The findings include. 1. Observation during an initial tour of the kitchen on 10/10/23 at 11:05 AM with the Dietary Director identified that multiple pieces of equipment used for or near food preparation areas were observed to have large amounts of debris. The covers over the stove for the exhaust vents located above the stoves and ovens had a thick scattered layer of grey matter, which appeared to be lint like material, attached to the vent covers. Further observations of the kitchen equipment identified that the microwave oven had hardened particles of various sizes and colors attached to the interior walls and the glass turntable of the appliance. Observations also identified that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 resident (Resident #117) reviewed for choices, the facility failed to ensure resident choices were accommodated when the resident requested to go to bed, and staff did not assist the resident for 2 hours and 30 minutes. The findings include: Resident #117 was admitted to the facility in September 2023 with diagnoses that included respiratory failure, pressure ulcer sacral stage II, pressure ulcer buttock stage III, and pressure ulcer heel unstageable. The care plan dated 9/12/23 identified Resident #117's transfer status was assistance of 2 persons to wheelchair. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #117 had intact cognition and required extensive two persons assistance with transfer, and bed mobility. The care plan dated 9/25/23 identified Resident #117 needed assist with bed mobility, transfers, and ambulation due to deconditioning related to hospitalization for pleural effusion.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #59) reviewed for diabetes management, the facility failed to ensure the physician and the resident's representative were notified when the resident's blood glucose (BG) levels were outside the parameters per the physician's order. The findings include. 1. Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, dementia, and anxiety disorder. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #59 had severely impaired cognition, was independent with eating, and had received daily Insulin injections during the last seven days. The care plan dated 9/15/23 identified Resident #59 had Insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Interventions included monitoring blood glucose levels per the physician's order, utilizing the sliding scale as ordered, administering Insulin as ordered, and monitoring for signs of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. A physician's order dated 6/30/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #55) reviewed for behaviors, the facility failed to ensure that the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASSAR) re-screening was completed following a newly identified mental health diagnosis. The findings include: Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, and hypertension. A Level I PASSAR completed on 3/16/22 identified a level II evaluation was not indicated as Resident #55 had no evidence of a serious behavioral health condition. The PASSAR also identified Resident #55 did not have any diagnoses of dementia or neurocognitive disorders. The care plan dated 1/19/23 identified Resident #55 had a history of exhibiting inappropriate sexual behaviors, including in common areas. Interventions included offering redirection and education as needed during signs and symptoms of behaviors. A physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0659 — isolatedProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interview for 1 resident (Resident #55) reviewed for behaviors, the facility failed to ensure that qualified staff provided targeted behavior observation and monitoring for a resident that required 1:1 constant observation for inappropriate behaviors. The findings include: Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, and hypertension. Review of the resident census sheet identified Resident #55 was hospitalized from [DATE] - [DATE] for inappropriate behaviors. Review of the resident census sheet identified Resident #55 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a new diagnosis of dementia with behavioral disturbance. The physician's orders dated [DATE] directed Resident #55 required 1:1 constant observation at all times and required behavior monitoring for hallucinations, inappropriate sexual behaviors, and insomnia. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #95) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL), the facility failed to ensure the resident was provided a shower on scheduled shower days. The findings include: Resident #95 was admitted to the facility in May 2023 with diagnoses that included morbid severe obesity, end stage renal disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #95 had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. The physician's order dated 9/1/23 directed to provide weekly skin checks on bath/shower day every Wednesday 7:00 AM - 3:00 PM shift. The care plan dated 9/7/23 identified Resident #95 had an Activity Daily Living (ADL's) deficit related to: Generalized weakness and recent hospitalization for chronic kidney failure. Interventions included to provide assistance with ADL's and provide privacy while…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 3 of 8 residents (Resident #8, 55 and 222) reviewed for accidents, for Resident #8 the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment was free of an accident hazards, for Resident #55 the facility failed to ensure that adequate supervision by trained staff was provided to a resident who required 1:1 constant observation for inappropriate behaviors, and for Resident #222 the facility failed to ensure the resident was properly positioned and supported during the application of a pain patch to the residents lowered back and subsequently, fell face first out of the bed onto the floor. The findings include. 1. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, hypothyroidism, and dysphagia. A physician's order dated 1/28/23 directed to administer Levothyroxine 25mcg Sodium (a thyroid medication) daily. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #8 had severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #48) reviewed for respiratory status, the facility failed to store the oxygen nasal canula in a sanitary manner. The findings include. Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebra infarction affecting left dominate side, heart failure unspecified dependence on supplemental oxygen. A physician's order dated 6/9/23 directed to apply oxygen via nasal cannula at 2 liters per min every shift. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #48 had intact cognition, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transferring, dressing and toileting, required limited assistance with locomotion and personal hygiene, used a wheelchair for mobility, and was dependent on supplemental oxygen. The care plan dated 8/17/23 identified a focus on oxygen dependency with interventions that included the provision of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and staff interviews for 1 resident (Resident #222) reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to remove 2 discontinued medications from the medication cart after they were discontinued by the physician, and both were subsequently sent home with the resident upon his/her discharge. The findings include: Resident #222 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stage II pressure ulcer, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side. Physician's order dated 9/3/22 directed to administer Ativan 0.5 mg as needed for anxiety for 14 days and Trazadone HCL 25 mg as needed for insomnia for 14 days at hours of sleep. Physician's order dated 9/8/22 directed to discontinued Trazadone HCL 25 mg as needed at hour of sleep. Physician's order dated 9/17/22 directed to discontinued Ativan 0.5 mg as needed for anxiety for 14 days. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #222) reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to ensure the recapitulation of the resident's stay included when the resident fell and was evaluated in the hospital, and failed to ensure medications sent home with the resident were current and not discontinued. The findings include. Resident #222 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]with diagnoses that included pressure ulcer of sacral stage II, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. The physician's order dated 9/3/22 directed to administer Ativan 0.5 mg tablet by mouth as needed for anxiety for 14 days and Trazadone HCL 25 mg tablet by mouth as needed for insomnia for 14 days at hours of sleep. A reportable event form dated 9/6/22 at 8:30 PM identified Resident #222 fell forward to the floor and bumped the left side of his/her forehead. The resident was alert and oriented and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #117, and 222) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to implement a pressure relieving device on the resident's bed when the resident was admitted to the facility with multiple pressure ulcers. The findings include: 1. Resident #117 was admitted to the facility in September 2023 with diagnoses that included respiratory failure, pressure ulcer sacral stage II, pressure ulcer buttock stage III, and pressure ulcer heel unstageable. The physician's order dated 9/8/23 directed to complete a weekly skin check on shower day (Wednesday on the 7:00 AM - 3:00 PM shift), apply Skin Prep to heels twice a day every day and evening shift for 14 days, and offload heels every shift as tolerated. The physician's order dated 9/8/23 failed to direct the use of an alternating pressure mattress. The physician's order dated 9/9/23 directed to cleanse the left heel, right shin, bilateral buttocks,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for two of three sampled residents (Resident #38) reviewed for an injury of unknown origin and (Resident #355) reviewed for verbal mistreatment , the facility failed to ensure that the injury of unknown origin and the alleged verbal mistreatment was reported to the DNS, Administrator and to the State Survey Agency within the appropriate time parameters. The findings include: 1. Resident #38's diagnoses included vascular dementia without behavioral disturbances, peripheral vascular disease, atrial fibrillation, and quadriplegia. A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required total assistance of two staff for most activities of daily living. The RCP dated 4/24/21 identified the resident had the potential for skin impairment with interventions that included; use of a draw sheet or lifting device to move resident, use caution during transfers and bed mobility to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility policy/procedures, review of facility documentation and interviews for two of three sampled residents (Resident #38) reviewed for an injury of unknown origin, and (Resident #355) reviewed for an allegation of mistreatment, the facility failed to immediately initiate an investigation for a bruise of unknown origin and for an allegation of verbal mistreatment and failed to protect the residents from potential further mistreatment. The findings include: 1. Resident #38's diagnoses included vascular dementia without behavioral disturbances, peripheral vascular disease, atrial fibrillation, and quadriplegia. The RCP dated 4/24/21 identified the resident had the potential for skin impairment with interventions that included; use a draw sheet or lifting device to move resident, use caution during transfers and bed mobility to prevent striking arms, legs and hands against any sharp or hard surfaces, educate resident/family/caregivers of causative factors and measures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #49) reviewed for an allegation of mistreatment the facility failed to ensure that care was provided in a dignified manner. The findings included: Resident #49's diagnoses included: contracture of the right knee, obesity, diabetes mellitus type II, sleep apnea, polyneuropathy and a history for falls. An admission assessment dated [DATE] identified the Resident was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance from staff for bed mobility and toileting and was incontinent of bowel. The RCP dated 2/2/21 identified the Resident was incontinent of bowel with interventions that included: offer bedpan/toilet assist approximately every two hours as needed, provide incontinent care every two hours and prn (as needed). The reportable event (RE) dated 2/10/21 at 3:43 PM identified that a male nurse aide (NA#5) made a negative statement to Resident #49…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for one of three sample residents (Resident #38) reviewed for skin integrity the facility failed to ensure the resident's physician and responsible party were notified of an injury of unknown origin in a timely manner. The findings included: Resident #38's diagnoses included vascular dementia without behavioral disturbances, peripheral vascular disease, atrial fibrillation, and quadriplegia. The RCP dated 4/24/21 identified the resident had the potential for skin impairment with interventions that included; use a draw sheet or lifting device to move resident, use caution during transfers and bed mobility to prevent striking arms, legs and hands against any sharp or hard surfaces, educate resident/family/caregivers of causative factors and measures to prevent skin injury, monitor/document location, size and treatment of skin injury, report abnormalities to physician, and inspect skin for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility documentation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure equipment was in good repair and safe for usage in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. The findings include: Observations on 7/23/21 at 10:03 AM of room [ROOM NUMBER] identified a dresser drawer with a detached handle and the privacy curtain between bed-A and bed-B had seven small to medium sized holes in the upper portions of the curtain. Interview and review of facility documentation (maintenance log books for the 3rd floor) with the Physical plant manager (PPM) on 7/27/21 at 11:07 AM identified he was unaware of the detached drawer handle and that the staff was to have placed it in the maintenance book which is reviewed by his staff throughout the day so that he can be informed of needed repairs. Subsequent to surveyor's inquiry the drawer handle was placed back into proper alignment and attached to the front panel of the drawer by the PPM. Interview on 7/23/21 at 1: 34 PM with the Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for one of three sampled resident (Resident #38) reviewed for skin integrity, the facility failed to ensure that a bruise (injury of unknown origin) was assessed and documented per acceptable standards of care. The findings included: Resident #38's diagnoses included vascular dementia without behavioral disturbances, peripheral vascular disease, atrial fibrillation, and quadriplegia. The RCP dated 4/24/21 identified the resident had the potential for skin impairment with interventions that included; use a draw sheet or lifting device to move resident, use caution during transfers and bed mobility to prevent striking arms, legs and hands against any sharp or hard surfaces, educate resident/family/caregivers of causative factors and measures to prevent skin injury, monitor/document location, size and treatment of skin injury, report abnormalities to physician, and inspect skin for signs or symptoms of redness or breakdown…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #605) who required an assist of two for transfers, the facility failed to ensure the resident was transferred with the assistance of two staff. The findings include: Resident #605 was admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital in July of 2021 with diagnoses that included: history of falls, laceration to head and dementia with behavioral disturbances. Review of a psychiatric evaluation performed in the hospital dated 7/19/21 identified Resident #605 was confused and had had a fall with injury. A physician's progress note, and a fall risk assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #605 was a fall risk. The physician's order dated 7/21/21 directed to transfer Resident #605 with an assist of two staff members. The initial Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 7/22/21 identified the need for assist with mobility and gait related to decreased mobility and weakness with an intervention to provide transfer assist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #81) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for oxygen treatment in a timely manner. The findings include: Resident #11 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included: malignant neoplasm, diabetes mellitus (DM), pulmonary nodule, hypertension, atrial flutter and weakness. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #81 had moderate cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance of one staff member for bed mobility and personal hygiene, required extensive assistive of two staff members for toileting and was totally dependent on staff for dressing. An APRN progress note dated 7/19/21 at 8:14 PM identified Resident #81 had no new cough, breathing was not labored, and the resident was not short of breath (SOB). Observations on 7/22/21 at 3:02 PM and 7/23/21 at 9:45 AM identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident # 358) reviewed for transmission based precautions (TBP), facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed according to policy for required use of eye protection when providing care. The findings include: Resident #358 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension, Type II diabetes and anemia. RN Progress note dated 7/24/21 noted Resident #358 was not vaccinated and would be placed on transmission based precautions (TBP). Observation on 7/27/21 at 5:53 AM identified NA #2 enter resident #358's room after donning a gown and gloves (a face mask was already in place) without the benefit of wearing eye protection. NA #2 proceeded to provide care for Resident #358. An interview on 7/27/21 at 6:00 AM with NA #2 identified she did not don eye protection because there was no eye protective equipment located on the cart. NA #2 indicated that while she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for meal intake documentation, (Resident #1), the facility failed to ensure that meal intake was documented. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included diffuse traumatic brain injury, and hemiplegia. Review of the Care Card dated 7/27/23 identified Resident #1 was a total feed. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had sever cognitive impairment and was dependent with eating. The Resident Care Plan dated 1/9/24 identified Resident #1 as at risk for dehydration related to fluid volume deficit, at increased nutritional risk due to mechanically altered diet, dysphagia, and required staff to feed at meal time with interventions that directed to monitor intake and output as needed, to provide, serve diet as ordered and to monitor intake and record each meal. Review of the Food and Fluid Intake log sheet dated March 2024 indicated Resident #1's usual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-10-18 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #105 and 112), reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to ensure the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified when the residents were transferred to the hospital. The findings include. 1. Resident #105 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 with diagnoses that included senile degeneration of brain, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. Review of the census list form dated 3/4/23 identified Resident #105 was transferred to the hospital. The nurse's note dated 3/29/23 at 11:52 PM identified Resident #105 was readmitted to the facility. Review of the Admit/Discharge Report dated 4/14/23 failed to reflect that the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman had been notified when Resident #105 was transferred to the hospital on 3/4/23. 2. Resident #112 was admitted to the facility in May 2023 with diagnoses that included traumatic brain injury, aphasia, and hypertension. Review of the census list form dated 6/6/23 identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-10-18 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based observation, review and facility documentation, and interviews the facility failed to post accurate nursing staffing information. The findings include. Observation of the posted nurse staffing identified the following. For 10/16/23, 10/17/23 and 10/18/23, the posted nurse staffing for licensed and certified staff for the 7:00 AM - 3:00 PM shift was not accurate. The posted nurse staffing identified there were more licensed and certified staff than were in the facility working. For 10/16/23, the posted nurse staffing for certified staff for the 11:00 PM - 7:00 AM shift was not accurate. The posted nurse staffing identified there were more certified staff than were in the facility working. For 10/15/23, the posted nurse staffing for licensed and certified staff for the 7:00 AM - 3:00 PM shift and for the 3:00 PM - 11:00 PM shifts were not accurate. The posted nurse staffing identified there were more licensed and certified staff than were in the facility working. Interview with the DNS 10/18/23 at 10:24 PM identified the posted nurse staffing form should be correct and she will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interview for 5 residents (Resident #55, 66, 85, 87, 95) reviewed for activities of daily living, falls and behaviors, the facility failed to ensure a the medical record was complete and accurate. The findings include. 1. Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, and hypertension. A physician's order dated 1/29/23 directed to provide 1:1 constant observation for inappropriate behaviors. Review of the resident census sheet identified Resident #55 was hospitalized from [DATE] - 5/2/23 for inappropriate behaviors. Review of the resident census sheet identified Resident #55 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a new diagnosis of dementia with behavioral disturbance. The physician's orders dated 5/2/23 directed 1:1 constant observation at all times, and required behavior monitoring for hallucinations, inappropriate sexual behaviors, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2021-07-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #53), the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was complete and accurate in reflecting the residents diagnoses, intake and output record and recommendations for a follow up appointment with a specialist. The findings include: 1. Resident #53's admission MDS dated [DATE] identified the resident had adequate vision, no cognitive impairment, no problems with mood or behavior, required supervision for personal hygiene, had a compression fracture of the vertebrae and a diagnosis of asthma. Review of the clinical record identified that on 6/11/21, diagnoses were added to the clinical record that were inclusive of type 2 diabetes, dementia with behavioral disturbances, retinal detachment with retinal break, cognitive communication deficit, age-related physical debility, and unspecified fracture of the left humerus. Interview and review of the clinical record with the DNS on 7/26/21 at 1:26 PM identified the diagnoses for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES — 42 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
The other 41 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 41; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BG II OPCO ML LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 10/10/2024 |
| CEDAR HILL CAPITAL ASSOCIATES LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/10/2024 |
| DYMER HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/10/2024 |
| ILANA OSTREICHER FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/10/2024 |
| JUNIPER CAPITAL ASSOCIATES LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/10/2024 |
| MARC EPHRAM OSTREICHER FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/10/2024 |
| OAK MANAGEMENT CAPITAL LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/10/2024 |
| YSRO TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/10/2024 |
| ZADUN II HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/10/2024 |
| EHRENFELD, MINDY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/10/2024 |
| DAVID OSTREICHER FAMILY TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/10/2024 |
| EJ CAPITAL HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/10/2024 |
| GM EQUITIES LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/10/2024 |
| GRAY FAMILY INVESTORS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/10/2024 |
| LEVON PAPA II LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/10/2024 |
| LPKLR LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/10/2024 |
| MICHELLE OSTREICHER FAMILY TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/10/2024 |
| PATRIOT HC 233 LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/10/2024 |
| SHAYNA STEG FAMILY TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/10/2024 |
| WHITE DEER INVESTMENTS, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/10/2024 |
| YITZCHOK STEG FAMILY TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/10/2024 |
| EHRENFELD, JACOB | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/10/2024 |
| GELBTUCH, JAY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/10/2024 |
| LOPIANSKY, REBECCA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/10/2024 |
| MILLSTEIN, NECHAMA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/10/2024 |
| OSTREICHER, DAVID | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/10/2024 |
| OSTREICHER, MARVIN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/10/2024 |
| OSTREICHER, MICHELLE | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/10/2024 |
| STEG, SHAYNA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/10/2024 |
| STEG, YITZCHOK | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/10/2024 |
| WEISZ, DAVID | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/10/2024 |
| WOLKENFELD, STEFAN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/10/2024 |
| MASTER TENANT HOLDCO CT5 II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/10/2024 |
| OSTREICHER, MARC | Individual | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/10/2024 |
| NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/19/2024 |
| AUGUSTIN, ELZA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/19/2024 |
| DESILVA, GARUMUNI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/02/2024 |
| GILMARTIN, THOMAS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/19/2024 |
| ARIELLA EHRENFELD INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/02/2024 |
| BAKER TILLY ADVISORY GROUP LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/19/2024 |
| PREFERRED THERAPY SOLUTIONS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/19/2024 |
| PROCARE LTC HOLDING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/19/2024 |
| YOSSI EHRENFELD INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/02/2024 |
| OSTREICHER, ILANA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/12/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 67 rows in the source record cover these 44 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
27 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CT
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075386. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.