No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Beacon Brook Center For Health & Rehabilitation

89 Weid Drive, Naugatuck, CT 06770 · For profit - Corporation · 126 certified beds · (203) 729-9889 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 20241 immediate-jeopardy citation$16,801 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2024
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $16,801 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-02)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
799 New Haven Rd · (203) 723-5636 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1100 New Haven Rd · (203) 729-2288 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Atlantis0.2 mi
1059 New Haven Rd · (203) 456-2422 · Call to confirm hours
Park
261 Beacon Rd · (203) 393-1433 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1006 New Haven Rd · (203) 723-7497

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.9%18.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.4%6.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms15.1%22.3%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.7%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.4%16.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.1%17.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine77.7%93.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.6%4.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.7%24.7%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.4%17.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.7%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine56.8%69.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.1%24.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit22.2%10.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.532.061.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.741.461.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 129 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
61.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.20hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 61.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.9%CMS range 46.8–64.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.8%CMS range 6.4–11.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge61.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge47.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 3.9–9.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.801.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.55
RN hours/ resident / day
0.94
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.19
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.68
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
32.2%
Total nursing turnover
40.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 126 beds and averages 117.2 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.547 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.83 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-05)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-02)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, and staff interviews for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #101) reviewed for non-compliance with smoking, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and failed to implement interventions to prevent an accident hazard after repeated incidents of noncompliance related to smoking. These failures resulted in a finding of Immediate Jeopardy. The findings include: 1. Resident #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included cellulitis of abdominal wall, alcohol abuse and nicotine dependence. Resident #101 had a conservator of both estate and person. The admission Smoking Evaluation assessment dated [DATE] identified no desire to smoke at the time of the admission. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/14/24 identified both short- and long-term memory loss. Interventions included referring to time of day, date, and recent events with interactions, and to utilize simple direct communication, verbal cues, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record reviews, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 4 residents (Resident # 418) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to perform wound care as prescribed by the physician to prevent further skin breakdown and for (Resident # 90), the facility failed to ensure weekly skin audits were completed in accordance with the facility policy. The findings included: 1. Resident #418 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, and paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body). The care plan dated 6/20/22 for at risk for further skin breakdown. Interventions included to inspect skin for redness, irritation or break down during care., to apply a low air loss mattress, offer turning and repositioning approximately every two hours and when needed, pressure reducing cushion/mattress when needed, weekly skin inspections and treatment as ordered. The quarterly Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the record was complete and accurate to include physical therapy directions regarding use of a gait belt. The findings include: Resident #1 had a diagnosis of falls, and anemia. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a BIMS of 15 indicating intact cognition, was dependent for toileting, and required maximal assistance with transfers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/13/2026 identified deficit in functional mobility and a potential for falls. Interventions directed assistance of one (1) staff for transfers. Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) note dated 1/27/2026 at 9:45 AM identified a fall on 1/27/2026 with a skin tear on the left knee and right forearm. The note identified Resident #1 was alert and oriented to baseline with pupils equal, round, and reactive, and cranial nerves intact. Multiple Steri-Strips were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident #41) reviewed for advanced directives, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives were consistent throughout the clinical record. The findings include:Resident #41's was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included rhabdomyolysis (a rare muscle injury where your muscles break down), epilepsy (seizure disorder) and major depressive disorder. A facility Advanced Directive Consent/Acknowledgement and Release Form signed by Resident #41 and LPN #9 on [DATE] identified Resident #41 did not want Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), Artificial Respiration and Artificial Nutrition administered. The signed form was retained in Resident #41's medical record.An admission physician's order dated [DATE] at 5:38 AM and [DATE] at 10:45 PM directed to provide CPR for Resident #41 (a discrepancy with the Advanced Directive Consent form signed by Resident #41 and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident/staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that food items were maintained at a palatable and appetizing temperature at time of serving. The findings include: Food Committee Meeting Minutes from 1/13/25, 2/24/25, 4/21/25, 5/19/25, 6/16/25, and 7/23/25 identified resident complaints of cold food.On 1/2/25 at 12:20 PM a test/temperature tray was conducted with the Director of Dietary and the following was identified:At 12:26 PM the test tray was prepared and plated in the kitchen located on the basement floor. The test meal was plated on a heated dish, placed in a plastic base, covered with a plastic dome, and put onto a meal tray. The meal tray was then placed in a closed meal delivery truck with other resident trays. The meal delivery truck left the kitchen at 12:27 PM for its destination to the second-floor unit.At 12:29 PM (2 minutes after leaving the dietary department), the meal delivery cart arrived at the second-floor (hallway 1), where multiple staff members were observed distributing trays to residents.At 12:39 PM (12…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for pressure ulcers and for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #15) reviewed for a tracheostomy, the facility failed to wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during wound and tracheostomy care. Additionally, for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #29) reviewed for skin conditions, and for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #60) reviewed for dialysis, the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). The findings include: 1.Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in December 2023 with diagnoses that included dementia, spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) bacteria in urine (highly antibiotic-resistant bacteria in urine) which is a multidrug resistant organism (MDRO) and stage 3 pressure ulcer. The reentry Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #13 was unable to participate in a Brief Interview for Mental Status due to severe cognitive impairment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews for 1 of 5 (Resident #42) reviewed for dining, the facility failed to ensure a dignified dining experience. The findings included: Resident #42 was admitted to the facility in July 2022 with diagnoses that included dementia, anxiety, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #42 was severely cognitively impaired and required set up assistance for meals and moderate assistance with activities of daily living.The Resident Care Plan dated 11/5/25 identified Resident #42 had swallowing difficulty with interventions that included to provide adequate time to consume meals, assist as needed, no rice, honor food preferences, monitor for any signs of difficulty swallowing, monitor for malnutrition, and document amount eaten.Physician's orders dated 11/24/25 directed to provide easy to chew food textures (mechanical soft) with regular liquids. Observation of the 2nd floor main dining room on 12/29/25 at 12:35 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #29) reviewed for accidents the facility failed to follow the plan of care for a resident with a history of falls. The findings include: Resident #29's diagnoses included a displaced fracture of the left lower leg, repeated falls, and a history of falls.A fall evaluation dated 2/15/25 identified Resident #29 was a high fall risk, was unsteady and had unsafe behaviors. The fall evaluation indicated Resident #29 had intermittent confusion and disorientation and a visual impairment.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #29 was cognitively intact and required substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility, toileting, and transfers. The MDS also indicated Resident #29 had a lower extremity impairment on one side.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/29/25 identified Resident #29 had impaired mobility and muscle weakness and was at risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of the clinical record, and review of facility policy for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #109) reviewed for issues with care, the facility failed to revise the resident's care plan following a staff-related grievance that resulted in a change to how care was delivered. The findings include:Resident #109's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two Diabetes Mellitus, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #109 was cognitively intact, independent with eating, required set-up assistance for oral hygiene, and was dependent for toileting, bathing, dressing, and transfers. A Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/8/25 identified Resident #109 experienced anxiety with interventions that included to provide reassurance and implement supportive psychiatric and social services. Additionally, the RCP identified Resident #109 exhibited accusatory behavior with interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #41) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure administration of the correct medication according to professional standards of practice. The findings includeResident #41 had diagnoses that included rhabdomyolysis (muscle injury where the muscles break down), pain in left hip, and anxiety.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #41 was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff for oral/personal hygiene, toilet use and bathing. The MDS further identified Resident #41 was not taking opioid medication.The Resident Care Plan identified Resident #41 had the potential for pain related to rhabdomyolysis, pain in the left ankle, joints of the left foot, the left hip and left shoulder. Interventions included to administer medication per orders, evaluate the effectiveness of pain interventions and monitor/document the side effects…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #13 and Resident #41) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's), the facility failed to provide nail care for residents who required assistance with personal care. The findings include: 1. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in December 2023 with diagnoses that included dementia, cerebral infarction (stroke) with left side weakness, and malnutrition. The re-entry Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #13 had a short/long term memory problem and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. The Resident Care Plan dated 12/18/25 identified a deficit in ADLs/self-care related to weakness, left hemiparesis, and the need for assistance with personal care. Interventions included to provide assistance with feeding, assistance with all personal hygiene, physical and occupational therapy as needed. Physician orders dated 12/20/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1of 1 resident reviewed for positioning/mobility, the facility failed to follow physician orders regarding skin protection (Resident #14) and for 1 of 5 residents, (Resident #125) reviewed for dining, the facility failed to ensure meal supervision and feeding by staff was provided in accordance with physician order and the plan of care, resulting in a choking incident. The findings include: 1.Resident #14's diagnosis included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting left side, dysphagia, and diabetes. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MD) dated 11/21/25 identified Resident #14 was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff for eating, showering, toileting, dressing, and transfers: The MDS further identified Resident #14 was at risk for developing a pressure ulcer requiring a pressure reducing device for the bed and chair. A physician's order dated 12/2/25 directed to apply…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, interviews, facility documentation and facility policy for 1 of 3 (Resident #13) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure that an alternating air pressure mattress was implemented timely per facility policy. The findings include:Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in December 2023 with diagnoses that included dementia, cerebral infarction (stroke) with left side weakness, and malnutrition.The readmission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #13 was severely cognitively impaired, required maximum assistance with bed mobility and was at risk for developing a pressure ulcer. A Braden Scale (tool to assess the risk for development pressure injury) was used to determine Resident #13's risk for developing a pressure ulcer dated 9/14/25 and 10/14/25 identified Resident #13 was at mild risk developing a pressure ulcer. There were no further Braden Scale assessments completed since 10/14/25.Physician's orders dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, interviews and facility policy for the only sampled resident (Resident #13) reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence/catheter, the facility failed to ensure Urologist orders were implemented for changing a urinary catheter. The findings included:Resident #13 was admitted in December 2023 with diagnoses that included obstructive and reflux uropathy (blockage in urinary system), urinary retention, and history of extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) bacteria in urine (highly antibiotic-resistant bacteria in urine).The discharge Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] identified that Resident #13 was unable to participate in a Brief Interview of Mental Status due to severe cognitive impairment, required moderate assistance with activities of daily living, and had an indwelling urinary catheter.Physician's orders dated 4/8/25 directed to replace indwelling urinary catheter size 16 French with 10 cubic centimeters (cc) [NAME] if removed/leaking or plugged as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy and staff interviews for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #14) reviewed for hospice, the facility failed to review and respond to pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner. The findings include:Resident #14's diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, bipolar, and post-traumatic stress disorder.A physician order dated 5/14/24 and currently in effect directed Lurasidone HCL (an antipsychotic medication used to treat schizophrenia and bipolar disorder) 40 milligrams (mg) once a day.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #14 was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Additionally, the MDS identified Resident #14 was administered antipsychotic medication, antianxiety and antidepressant medication.A Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 2/26/25 identified Resident #14 had the potential for behavior problems related to schizoaffective disorder, bipolar and post traumatic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, and interviews for 1 of 2 (Resident #116) reviewed for positioning/mobility, the facility failed to provide rehabilitation services as recommended by the orthopedic physician. The findings included:Resident #116 was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with diagnoses that included pain to lower back, right shoulder, and left thigh, effusion of left knee (swollen joint), and spondylosis cervical region (fracture of vertebrae). The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #116 had intact cognition and was independent with all activities of daily living.The Resident Care Plan dated 9/16/25 identified Resident #116 had actual/potential for pain related to chronic pain syndrome, right shoulder bursitis, left knee effusion, lumbar spinal stenosis, and cervical spondylosis. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered for pain, identify and treat resident' existing conditions, monitor and document probable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure supervision was provided in accordance with the resident plan of care, to prevent a resident incident. The findings include: Resident #1 had a diagnosis of dementia, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and cognitive communication deficit. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three (3), indicating severely impaired cognition, and was independent with ambulation. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 5/20/2025 identified the family approved a relationship with Resident #2. Interventions directed staff to supervise Resident #1 when resident visits Resident #2. Resident #2 had a diagnosis of dementia, anxiety, depression, and cognitive communication deficit. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had a BIMS of three (3), indicating severely impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one of three Residents (Resident #1) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to provide a timely Dietician evaluation to address a documented significant weight loss. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Diabetes Mellitus, dysphagia, anemia, heart failure and chronic kidney disease. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/1/2025 identified Resident #1 had nutrition related diagnoses of increased nutrient needs, malnutrition, a chronic wound and altered gastrointestinal status due to constipation, nausea and reflux. The RCP directed to allow Resident #1 time to eat, line of sight supervision at meals and a ground texture, thin consistency diet. A Dietician evaluation dated 5/6/2025 identified Resident #1 as a high risk for weight loss/nutritional needs and noted a 5 % weight loss over a month and a 11.4 % weight loss over a 6-month time frame. A protein…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1 and #3) reviewed for pressure injuries, the facility failed to complete and document skin risk assessment weekly post re-admission per facility protocol. The findings include: 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia, peripheral vascular disease and sepsis. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of ninety-nine (99) indicative of impaired cognition, was at risk for developing pressure ulcers/injuries, was frequently incontinent of bowel and required extensive assistance of two staff with activities of daily living (ADL's). The care plan dated 9/3/24 identified Resident #1 had impaired skin integrity and was at risk for further skin breakdown with interventions that included a low air loss (LAL) mattress, educate on risks to wound healing, inspect skin during care,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed ensure the resident was free from neglect and care was provided timely. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included a stroke with hemiplegia/hemiparesis (weakness/loss of movement) affecting the right dominant side. A quarterly MDs assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 BIMs was 99, indicating Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired and could not complete the interview, and Resident #1 did not speak, rarely understood verbal content and had highly impaired vision. Resident #1 was at risk for pressure ulcers, was incontinent, was dependent for all care, required two (2) staff for bed mobility and transfers. The RCP dated 8/12/2024 identified Resident #1 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. The RCP directed to provide incontinent care every two (2) to three (3) hours and use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure care was provided in accordance with physician orders and failed to ensure the NA reported when she could not provide care timely, resulting in a delay in care. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included a stroke with hemiplegia/hemiparesis (weakness/loss of movement) affecting the right dominant side. A quarterly MDs assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 BIMs was 99, indicating Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired and could not complete the interview, and Resident #1 did not speak, rarely understood verbal content and had highly impaired vision. Resident #1 was at risk for pressure ulcers, was incontinent, was dependent for all care, required two (2) staff for bed mobility and transfers. The RCP dated 8/12/2024 identified Resident #1 was incontinent of bowel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who's medications were put on hold when the resident was transferred to the Emergency Department, the facility failed notify the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse or physician at the time when the medications were not resumed when the resident returned to the facility, therefore the medications were omitted for eleven (11) days. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included diabetes, cardiac infarction, atrial fibrillation and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and pain related to immobility. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 made reasonable and consistent decisions regarding tasks of daily life. The Resident Care Plan dated 9/3/24 identified altered cardiac status related to congestive heart failure and heart attack, neurological bladder with indwelling foley and pain related to decreased mobility. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #4) who were reviewed for an allegation of abuse, the facility failed to ensure appropriate supervision, for a resident on one-to-one (1:1) supervision due to aggressive and sexual behaviors, to prevent the resident from having inappropriate physical contact with another resident. The findings include: Resident #3's diagnoses included dementia with behavior disturbances, frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, myocardial infarction, and antisocial personality disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had short-and long-term memory recall deficits, made poor decisions regarding tasks of daily life, had verbal behavioral symptoms towards others, and was independent for mobility utilizing a wheelchair. The Resident Care Plan dated 7/26/24 identified Resident #3 has mood and behavior patterns including verbal expressions of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for transfer to the Emergency Department, the facility failed to ensure the residents' medication regimen was accurately reconciled after returning from the hospital to prevent the omission of medications for eleven (11) days. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included diabetes, cardiac infarction, atrial fibrillation and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and pain related to immobility. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 made reasonable and consistent decisions regarding tasks of daily life. The Resident Care Plan dated 9/3/24 identified altered cardiac status related to congestive heart failure and heart attack, neurological bladder with indwelling foley and pain related to decreased mobility. The nurse's note dated 9/15/24 at 11:55 AM identified Resident #1 was having hallucination,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were required staff assistance with personal hygiene, the facility failed to maintain safety to prevent the resident from falling out of the bed while turning and repositioning the resident when incontinent care was provided. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies and dementia. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 made poor decisions regarding tasks of daily life, was dependent on staff with rolling from side to side, toileting, and personal hygiene, had functional limitation in range of motion impairments on both sides of the upper and lower extremities, and was always incontinent of urine and bowel. The Resident Care Plan dated 5/14/24 identified Resident #1 had an activities of daily living deficit related to generalized weakness, recent hospitalization, and impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for neglect the facility failed to provide incontinent care in a timely manner. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, anxiety, and aphasia (impaired ability to communicate). A quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition, required assistance with bed mobility and ADLs, and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. The Resident Care Plan dated 5/20/2024 identified Resident #1 required assistance with ADLS. Interventions directed to assist with toileting and provide incontinent care as needed. Facility incident report dated 6/17/2024 at 12:15 PM identified Resident #1 was alert and aphasic alert, aphasic and alleged neglect on 6/16/2024 at 9:30 PM. The report identified Resident #1 was alleged to have not received incontinent care for most of the evening shift on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for the implementation of their care plan, the facility failed to ensure the care plan intervention of two (2) staff members for all care for Resident #1 was followed. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included depression, anxiety, mood disorder and psychosis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 made poor decisions regarding tasks of daily life, required extensive assistance with turning and repositioning while in bed, was dependent with toileting and required two (2) staff members for transfers in and out of the bed and chair via a mechanical lift, Hoyer lift. The Resident Care Plan dated 2/2/24 identified Resident #1 had accusatory behaviors towards staff. Interventions directed two (2) staff to always be present in the room, one (1) for care and one (1) for support and assign staff that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility policy and interviews for 11 of 12 sample residents (Resident #20, Resident #21, Resident #44, Resident #45, Resident #54, Resident #61, Resident #72, Resident #76, Resident #98, Resident #102, and Resident #109) reviewed for timely physician's visits, the facility failed to ensure physician's visits were conducted timely. The findings included: 1 Resident # 20's was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included respiratory failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, psychosis, and depression. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #20 had moderate cognitive impairment, and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, toileting, hygiene, and transfer. Review of the physician's orders from August 2023 through May 2, 2024, identified Resident #20 physician's orders were not renewed and signed every 60 days. The most current physician's orders were last signed on 7/23/23. 2. Resident # 21's was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy and interview for 4 nursing units, the facility failed to ensure medications stored in the medication carts were labeled, refrigerator temperatures that contain vaccines were taken and documented consistently twice daily and for 1 of 1resident (Resident #101) observed on tour, the facility failed to properly secure medications. The findings include: 1.Observation and interview of the [NAME] view medication cart on 4/16/2024 at10:20 AM with LPN#6 identified a bottle of Humalog insulin without a prescription label, box/bag or when the medication was first opened was found in the top drawer of the medication cart along with an auto injector of epinephrine 0.3mg without label, box/bag of who it belonged to. A clear bag of medications was found in the bottom of the medication cart without labels and LPN #6 indicated s/he did not know who the medication belonged to and would consult with the RN supervisor as to what to do with the medications. 2.Observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff applied a beard guard when preparing food to ensure a sanitary environment. The findings include: Observation on 4/15/24 at 11:37 AM during the tray line with the Director of Dietary identified during plating of food from the cooking area to steam tables, [NAME] # 1 stirring a tray of beef stew at steam table #3. [NAME] #1 during the platting of food was observed with a beard and without the benefit of a beard guard. An interview with [NAME] #1 identified he had been told to wear a beard guard in the past. [NAME] #1 further indicated he had forgotten to use a beard guard since he usually does not have a long beard. After, [NAME] #1 proceeded to don a beard guard. An interview with the Director of Dietary identified Cook#1 should have been wearing a beard guard. A review of the facility's Uniform Policy notes in part that chefs or cooks should wear an apron, chef coat or shirt, chef pants, shoes, chef hat, hairnet or cap, and beard guards.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record interviews and facility policy for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #268) reviewed for change in condition , the facility failed to ensure staff notified the physician and the responsible party when the resident experienced a change in condition and for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #418) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to notify physician when a treatments were not provided. The findings included: 1. Resident # 268's diagnoses included Cerebral infarction, aphasia following cerebral infarction, dysphagia, and atrial fibrillation. A physician's order dated 12/2/2022 directed Eliquis (Anticoagulant) 5 Milligrams ( MG) tablet orally twice daily for a Deep Vein Thrombosis (blood clot) of the left lower extremity for 12 weeks. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #268 was cognitively intact. The care plan dated 12/15/2022 indicated Resident #268 had a diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation with interventions to provide medications as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, review of facility grievance file for 1 of 2 residents ( Resident #74) reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to ensure a residents grievance was addressed timely. The findings include: Resident #74's diagnoses included neuromuscular disfunction of the bladder and diabetes mellitus The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #74 was cognitively intact. The Resident Care Plan ( RCP) dated 3/4/2024 indicated ADL deficit related to generalized weakness and a neuromuscular condition with lower extremity weakness. Intervention included : to keep the call bell and needed items within reach and to provide assistance and or cueing to maximize current level of function. 0n 4/11/24 at 1:05 PM the Director of Nursing Services ( DNS) was updated regarding allegations Resident #74 made regarding change of shift noise at 7:00 AM on the unit and a 3-11 PM staff member (not identified) was not answering the call light timely. The DNS indicated s/he would look into the matter. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #92) reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASRR), the facility failed to ensure a resident had a PASRR II or Level of Care re-screen completed upon admission to the facility. The findings include: Resident #92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a cerebral infarction, dementia, anxiety disorder, and depressive disorder. The Notice of Care Determination dated 7/7/22 identified Resident #92 was approved for long term care based on the submission data which included the following diagnoses: cerebral infarction, atrial fibrillation, hypertensive encephalopathy, transient ischemic attack, irritable bowel syndrome, head laceration, sequela, leukemoid reaction, headache syndrome, nausea, anxiety disorder, depressive episodes, and heart failure. The Inter-Agency Patient Referral report date 8/7/23 identified Resident #92's pertinent history…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical records, review of policy and interviews for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications( Resident #74), the facility failed to failed to ensure that the resident's care plan address the resident's use of antipsychotic medications per plan and for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #92) reviewed for PASSR, the facility failed to ensure the facility developed a comprehensive care plan for a resident with a history of mental disorder. The findings included: 1. Resident #74's diagnoses included a blood disorder not yet in remission and iron deficiency anemia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #74 was cognitively intact. The care plan dated 3/4/2024 indicated Resident #74 had a blood disorder not yet achieving remission and noted utilization of medication to treat the disorder. Intervention included in part to provide medications as ordered, to encourage consumption of fluids and to report any adverse medication side effects to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 101) reviewed for smoking in a non-smoking facility, the facility failed to review and revise the resident's care plan to ensure safety as the resident continued to be non-compliant with smoking in the facility The finding include: Resident #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included cellulitis of abdominal wall, alcohol abuse and nicotine dependence. Resident #101 had a conservator of both estate and person. The admission Smoking Evaluation assessment dated [DATE] identified no desire to smoke at the time of the admission. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/14/24 identified both short- and long-term memory loss. Interventions included referring to time of day, date, and recent events with interactions, and to utilize simple direct communication, verbal cues, and task segmentation. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record review, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident # 418) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure wound treatments were transcribed and preformed per physician's orders. The findings include: Resident #418 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, and paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #418 required extensive assistance from at least two people for bed mobility and transfers. Additionally, the MDS identified Resident #418 had two stage 3 pressure ulcers. A care plan dated 6/29/22 identified Resident #418 had two stage 3 pressure ulcers to the right and left buttocks. Interventions included a low air loss mattress, turning and positioning every 2 hours, and providing treatments as ordered. The physician's order 6/17/22 through 7/27/22 directed offload…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #101) reviewed for bowel and bladder, the facility failed to assess the resident ability for self-care of a colostomy secondary to resident's refusals to allow staff to provide the care. The findings include: Resident #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included cellulitis of abdominal wall, alcohol abuse and nicotine dependence. Resident #101 has a COP. The physician's order dated 3/11/24 directed to provide colostomy care every shift, and to apply Triad cream to macerated/reddened areas to abdomen, groin, and perineal area every shift for cellulitis. The hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] at 5:28 PM identified because of a wellness check, Resident #101's colostomy stoma was covered with a diaper resulting in extensive redness, and skin breakdown in the abdominal area extending to the groin. Resident #101 acknowledged consuming alcohol for pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for oxygen (Resident #80), the facility failed to ensure the resident received oxygen therapy as prescribed. The findings include: Resident #80's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident#80 was cognitively intact and did not exhibit any behaviors of rejecting evaluation or care. Additionally, the MDS indicated the resident was independent with toileting and personal hygiene and required setup or cleanup assistance with eating and bathing. The care plan dated 2/19/24 identified a diagnosis of COPD, shortness of breath on exertion, and oxygen dependence. Interventions included: administering oxygen and monitoring effectiveness, educating on the importance of wearing a BiPAP (a machine used to help to breathe during sleep), and elevating the head of the bed to assist in avoiding shortness of breath.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, interview, and policy for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #74) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were obtained and reviewed and failed to ensure an AIMS assessment was completed timely for a resident who was started on an antipsychotic medication. The findings included. Resident #74's diagnoses included a blood disorder not yet in remission and iron deficiency anemia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #74 was cognitively intact. The care plan dated 3/4/2024 indicated Resident #74 had a blood disorder not yet achieving remission and noted utilization of medication to treat the disorder. Intervention included in part to provide medications as ordered, to encourage consumption of fluids and to report any adverse medication side effects to the physician. A physician's order dated 3/14/2024 at 8:00 AM directed to provide Zyprexa (Antipsychotic medication) Oral Tablet 5 Milligrams…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interview for 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 101) reviewed for smoking, the facility failed to ensure that a copy of the resident's conservatorship was in the clinical record in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices of complete an accurate medical record. The findings include: Resident #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included cellulitis of abdominal wall, alcohol abuse and nicotine dependence. Resident #101 had a conservator of both estate and person. The admission Smoking Evaluation assessment dated [DATE] identified no desire to smoke at the time of the admission. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/14/24 identified both short- and long-term memory loss. Interventions included referring to time of day, date, and recent events with interactions, and to utilize simple direct communication, verbal cues, and task segmentation. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews, review of policy and interviews for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #74) reviewed for urinary catheter the facility failed to ensure the catheter collection bag was stored in a sanitary manner and for 1 of 1 resident ( Resident # 101) observed during a tour of the facility, the facility failed to ensure that resident equipment was stored in a sanitary manner to prevent the spread of infection. The findings include: 1.Resident #74's diagnosis included neuromuscular disfunction of the bladder and diabetes mellitus. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #74 was cognitively intact. The care plan dated 3/4/2024 indicated Resident #74 had a foley catheter due to neurogenic bladder and was at risk for infection. Interventions included: to change the foley catheter and bag per physician's order and the catheter monthly, to provide catheter care every shift and to attach a securement device to the foley catheter. Observation on 4/11/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for two of three sampled residents (Residents #4 and #5) who were reviewed for an allegation of resident to resident sexual abuse, the facility failed to ensure Resident #4 was not touched inappropriately by Resident #5. The findings include: Resident #4's diagnoses included dementia, anxiety, and difficulty ambulating. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #4 had memory recall deficits, was totally dependent on staff for eating, hygiene, showers, toileting, and dressing and utilized a wheelchair for mobility. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/19/23 identified that Resident #4 had a self-care deficit and was unable to maintain an upright seated position. Interventions included mechanical lift with two (2) staff to transfer the resident into and out of bed and utilized a modified tilt in space wheelchair for mobility. The RCP addressed anxiety and depression with interventions that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who was dependent on staff with getting in and out of the bed and chair and who had sustained a laceration, the facility failed to ensure the safety of Resident #1 during a Hoyer lift transfer into the bed. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included pulmonary embolism, weakness, gait and mobility abnormalities, anemia, and anxiety disorder. The physical therapy evaluation dated 12/8/23 identified Resident #1 was receiving physical therapy services six (6) times a week for thirty (30) days. The evaluation indicated Resident #1 required maximum assistance with bed mobility and transfers with a Hoyer lift and the assistance of two (2). The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had memory recall deficits, required maximum assistance to roll in the bed and transfer from one (1) surface to another, utilized a wheelchair for mobility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-10 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #87 and Resident #94) reviewed for dental services, the facility failed to ensure Resident #87 and Resident #94 were seen by dentist in a timely manner. The findings include: 1. Resident #87 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included a degenerative nerve disease, dementia without behaviors, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and dysphagia. A Dental consultative form dated 11/12/19 identified Resident #87 was seen by the dentist and noted a moderate amount of plaque, gingivitis and recommended annual exams and a prophylactic fluoride varnish in 6 months. The Dental consult also identified Resident #87 was missing tooth #7 and #32, #28 was fractured and #24, #25, #26 retained root. A Dental consultative form dated 6/22/20 indicated Resident #87 was seen by the Dental Hygienist for prophylaxis with a fluoride varnish and tooth #7 was not missing but retained root,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one of twelve residents reviewed for Advance Directives (Resident #25), the facility failed to obtain a physician's order related to the resident's preferred code status. The findings include: Resident #25's diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, alcohol abuse, anxiety disorder and adjustment disorder with depressed mood. A Resident Care Plan dated [DATE] identified Resident #25 had an established Advance Directive and wished to be a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). Interventions included to do not administer Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), review Advanced Directives with resident and/or healthcare decision maker quarterly, and RN may pronounce (RNP). The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #25 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with one person for physical assist for all activities of daily living. An Advanced Directives…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for two sampled residents (Residents #16 and #94) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the residents were free from mistreatment. The findings include: 1. Resident #16's diagnoses included dementia, adjustment disorder, anxiety, depression, encephalitis and macular degeneration. The annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #16 was severely cognitively impaired, was independent with ambulation and locomotion, required supervision with dressing and personal hygiene and had no behavioral symptoms. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/24/21 identified sometimes when seated close to others, the resident reached out and touched them, the resident was not mindful of what she/he was doing. Interventions included for staff to not seat resident too close to other residents. The RCP further identified Residents #16 had impaired cognitive function, dementia and impaired thought process related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #50) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision during a meal and failed to follow the facility aspiration precautions policy. The findings include: Resident #50 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included intestinal obstruction, a degenerative nerve disease, gastroenteritis, colitis, disease of stomach and duodenum, and irritable bowel syndrome. A Speech Therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE] indicated swallow strategies were to take small, single bites, eat slowly, avoid talking while chewing immediately after swallowing with continual supervision. The physician's order dated 12/21/21 directed a controlled carbohydrate diet with no added salt, regular consistency and thin liquids. Aspiration precautions directed to encourage resident to take small bites, eat slowly, and avoid talking with food in the mouth. The Medicare…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #77 and Resident #99) reviewed for a significant weight loss, that facility failed to document the amount consumed from a nutritional supplement (Resident #77), failed to obtain a re-admission weight and failed to consistently obtain daily weights per physician orders for Resident #99. The findings include: 1. Resident #77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a Stage 3 pressure ulcer, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Alzheimer's Disease. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #77 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of two for bed mobility. The MDS further identified Resident #77 required extensive assistance of one for dressing and was totally dependent on one staff for eating, toilet use and personal hygiene. Additionally, the MDS identified Resident #77's weight was 80…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-10 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #109) reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to ensure Social Services documented Resident #109 leaving Against Medical Advice (AMA), failed to follow up with Resident #109/Person #2 after leaving AMA and failed to notify Elderly Protective (EPS) when Person #1 signed Resident #109 out Against Medical Advice (AMA). The findings include: Resident #109 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included altered mental status and diabetes. The face sheet identified Resident #109 was responsible for him/herself and Person #2 was the emergency contact for Resident #109. The Hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] at 6:13 AM indicated Resident #109 was discharged from the hospital with a diagnosis of encephalopathy from toxic causes and other diagnosis of diabetes, hyperlipidemia, Vitamin B-12 deficiency, and orthostatic hypotension. The Discharge summary further identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #109) reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to document the notification to the physician/Advanced Practice Registered Nurse when Person #2 signed Resident #109 out Against Medical Advice (AMA).The findings include: Resident #109 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included altered mental status and diabetes. The face sheet identified Resident #109 was responsible for him/herself and Person #2 was the emergency contact for Resident #109. The Hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] at 6:13 AM indicated Resident #109 was discharged from the hospital with a diagnosis of encephalopathy from toxic causes and other diagnosis of diabetes, hyperlipidemia, Vitamin B-12 deficiency, and orthostatic hypotension. The Discharge summary further identified Resident #109 was confused to person and place for the previous 10 days to date of hospital discharge and had been having…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-01-05 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 sampled resident (Resident #107) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to provide the required notification of the transfer/discharge to the state Ombudsman's office. The findings include: Resident #107's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, and spinal stenosis.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 7/5/25 identified Resident #107 had the potential to fall with interventions that included to assist Resident #107 with transfers and ambulation as ordered, and to wear appropriate footwear when ambulating or when the resident was in the mobilized wheelchair. Additionally, the RCP identified Resident #107 had a deficit of functional mobility due to weakness with ambulation. Interventions included to provide and use a mechanical lift with transfers with 2 staff and provide positioning while out of bed.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #107…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-01-05 · tag F0646 — pattern
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #2) review for Pre-admission Screening Resident Review (PASRR), the facility failed to notify the PASRR agency to complete a Level 2 screen for a resident with a psychiatric diagnosis. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from another long-term care facility with diagnoses that included psychotic disorder with hallucinations related to physiological conditions, Parkinsons disease and hypertension.A Level 1 PASRR screen dated 2/1/19 (transferred with Resident #2 from the previous long term care facility) identified Resident #2 had no psychiatric history and therefore a Level 2 evaluation was not required.Psychiatric progress notes written by an Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) dated 10/20/25 identified Resident #2 had a psychotic disorder, stable on current psychiatric medications, resident denies psychiatric history, despite previous psychiatric diagnoses.On 1/5/26 at 10:18 AM, interview and clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$16,801 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-05-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES — 42 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 3 of 54.1-1.1 vs chain
The other 41 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Brentwood Center For Health & Rehabilitation, LLCYarmouth, ME 1 of 5The Pines At Utica Center For Nursing And RehabUtica, NY 2 of 5Bloomfield Center For Nursing & RehabilitationBloomfield, CT 2 of 5Eastside Center For Health & Rehabilitation, LLCBangor, ME 2 of 5Kennebunk Center For Health & Rehabilitation, LLCKennebunk, ME 2 of 5Ludlowe Center For Health & RehabilitationFairfield, CT 2 of 5Mansfield Center For Nursing And RehabilitationStorrs Mansfield, CT 2 of 5Montowese Center For Health & RehabilitationNorth Haven, CT 2 of 5Riverside Health & Rehabilitation CenterEast Hartford, CT 2 of 5Shady Knoll Center For Health & RehabilitationSeymour, CT 2 of 5Summit At Plantsville Center For Health & RehabiliPlantsville, CT 2 of 5The Pines At Catskill Center For Nursing & RehabCatskill, NY 2 of 5The Pines At Glens Falls Ctr For Nursing & RehabGlens Falls, NY 3 of 5Augusta Center For Health & Rehabilitation, LLCAugusta, ME 3 of 5Cambridge Health And Rehabilitation CenterFairfield, CT 3 of 5Evergreen Center For Health & RehabilitationStafford Springs, CT 3 of 5Glastonbury Center For Health & RehabilitationGlastonbury, CT 3 of 5Hebrew Center For Health And RehabilitationWest Hartford, CT 3 of 5Laurel Ridge Center For Health & RehabilitationRidgefield, CT 3 of 5Maefair Center For Health & RehabilitationTrumbull, CT 3 of 5Marlborough Health & Rehabilitation CenterMarlborough, CT 3 of 5Reservoir Center For Health & Rehabilitation, TheMarlborough, MA 3 of 5Water's Edge Center For Health & RehabilitationMiddletown, CT 3 of 5Winship Green Center for Health & Rehab, LLCBath, ME 4 of 5Bethel Health Care CenterBethel, CT 4 of 5Brewer Center For Health & Rehabilitation, LLCBrewer, ME 4 of 5Dover Center For Health & RehabilitationDover, NH 4 of 5Huntington Hills Center for Health and RehabilitatMelville, NY 4 of 5Pines At Bristol For Nursing & Rehabilitation, TheBristol, CT 4 of 5Sharon Center For Health & RehabilitationSharon, CT 4 of 5Stone Bridge Center For Health & RehabilitationNewtown, CT 4 of 5The Pines At Poughkeepsie Ctr For Nursing & RehabPoughkeepsie, NY 4 of 5The Pines at Rutland Center for Nursing & RehabiliRutland, VT 4 of 5Village Crest Center For Health & RehabilitationNew Milford, CT 5 of 5Belair Care Center IncBellmore, NY 5 of 5Maple View Health & Rehabilitation CenterRocky Hill, CT 5 of 5Milford Health And Rehabilitation CenterMilford, CT 5 of 5Norway Center For Health & Rehabilitation, LLCNorway, ME 5 of 5Pine Heights at Brattleboro Center for Nursing & RBrattleboro, VT 5 of 5Regency House Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterWallingford, CT

Showing 40 of 41; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MYDERT HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST51%since 06/07/2024
ZADUN HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST49%since 06/07/2024
CEDAR HILL CAPITAL ASSOCIATES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/07/2024
ILANA OSTREICHER FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/03/2025
JUNIPER CAPITAL ASSOCIATES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/07/2024
MARC EPHRAM OSTREICHER FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/03/2025
OAK MANAGEMENT CAPITAL LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/07/2024
YSRO TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/07/2024
EHRENFELD, MINDYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/07/2024
GILMARTIN, THOMASIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/07/2024
OSTREICHER, MARCIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/07/2024
NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/07/2024
RAYFORD, DANITAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/07/2024
BAKER TILLY ADVISORY GROUP LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/07/2024
DAVID OSTREICHER FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/03/2025
MICHELLE OSTREICHER FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/03/2025
PREFERRED THERAPY SOLUTIONS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/07/2024
PROCARE LTC HOLDING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/07/2024
OSOWSKI, JOHNIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/07/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.8M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 83%Medicare 6%Other / private 11%

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$397per resident / day
operating cost
$12,063per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$356per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Connecticut
$15,208/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,118/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075390. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next