Laurel Ridge Center For Health & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 143 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 126 beds and averages 114.0 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.23 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-08-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #6, Resident #40, Resident #55, Resident #161, and Resident #262) reviewed for resident to resident altercations, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical mistreatment. The findings include: 1. Resident #6's diagnoses included dementia, hypertension and type II diabetes mellitus. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 was moderately cognitively impaired and required limited 1 person assistance with transfers and ambulation. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 2/17/22 identified Resident #6 had impaired cognition related to dementia. Interventions directed to use simple, direct communication, verbal cues and task segmentation. The RCP also identified Resident #6 required 1 person assistance for transfers related to decreased strength, coordination, balance and impaired safety awareness, and Resident #6 not always wait for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, interviews, and review of facility documentation and policy for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure a change of condition was reported to the provider on two occasions in accordance with facility policy. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in December of 2024 with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent with eating, oral and personal hygiene, and independent with ambulation. Review of the Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 2/26/25 identified Resident #1 wandered related to dementia with behaviors and had the potential for falls due to poor safety awareness. Interventions directed to ensure Resident #1's room and the surrounding environment were safe and free from hazards that could cause harm and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and review of Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) the facility failed provide appropriate number of staff for Quarter 2 (January 1, 2024 through March 31, 2024 ). The findings include: PBJ submissions for Quarter 2, 2024 (January 1, 2024 to March 31, 2024) indicated excessively low weekend staffing. An interview on 4/8/25 at 11:41 AM with the Administrator identified for Quarter 2 in 2024 (January 1, 2024 to March 31, 2024), the previous owner would not allow the facility to use agency staff or to have licensed staff work as Nursing Assistants, which would assist with having adequate nursing staff. Further identifying that the facility did have low weekend staffing during Quarter 2 of 2024. Review of the Mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data in a uniform format. The facility must electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-08 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and review of Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) submissions for Quarter 1, 2025 (October 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024) the facility failed to ensure the PBJ data was submitted accurately. Also, it was identified through the PBJ report that the facility failed provide appropriate number of staff for Quarter 2 (January 1, 2024 through March 31, 2024 ). The findings include: PBJ submissions for Quarter 1 of 2025 identified the facility was had 1-star rating, Registered Nurse (RN) Hours and Licensed Nursing Coverage for 24 hours/day for 10/1/24, 10/2/24, 10/3/24, 10/4/24, 10/5/24, 10/6/24, 10/7/24, 10/8/24, and 10/9/24 identified no RN hours and failed to have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours/day. Also, identified on the PBJ report for Quarter 2, 2024 (January 1, 2024 to March 31, 2024) indicated excessively low weekend staffing. An interview on 4/8/25 at 11:41 AM with the Administrator identified that the No Registered Nurse hours along and a licensed nursing coverage for 24 hours in a day was triggered (coded) incorrectly by the previous owner of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation, and staff interviews for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for an injury of unknown origin, for 2 of 4 residents involved in resident to resident altercations (Resident #59 and Resident #81), and for four of eight residents (Resident #27, #40, #62 and #99) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to report the injury of unknown origin (Resident #9) and the resident to resident altercations to the Stage Agency. Additionally, for Resident #27, #40, #62 and #99, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an allegation of abuse immediately. The findings include: 1. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility in October of 2024 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (one sided muscle paralysis) affecting the right dominant side, hypertension, and diabetes. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #9 was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff for toileting and required maximum assistance for personal hygiene and bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #104) reviewed for recreational activities, the facility failed to provide activities that met Resident #104's interests and preferences. The findings include: Resident #104 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, diabetes, combined forms of age-related bilateral cataracts, and hypertension. An activities admission assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #104's past interests included drawing/painting, fishing, traveling, sports, movies, concerts, cooking, and listening to music. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #104 had a severe cognitive impairment, highly impaired vision, adequate hearing, and supervision or touching assistance with activities of daily living. The MDS (daily preferences) further identified that Resident #104 indicated that it was very important for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food temperatures were palatable. The findings include: A Resident council meeting was completed on 4/2/25 at 1:44 PM and residents verbalized concerns regarding food palatability, specifically cold food. The residents identified that they had raised the issue with the Food Service Director (FSD) during Monthly Food Committee meetings but food continued to be cold. Review of Food Committee Meeting minutes from 4/10/24 through 3/12/25 identified residents' concerns about cold food. On 4/10/24 residents expressed concerns about cold coffee, cold soup and cold dinner. On 8/14/24 a resident raised concern about cold soup. On 2/12/25 the FSD informed residents that if they get cold food, they could call the kitchen or ask the Nurse Aides (NA's) to warm the food since thermometers were available at the nursing stations to measure food temperatures. On 3/13/25 the issue about cold soup and cold meals was mentioned once again and the FSD encouraged residents to ask staff for food to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-08 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, initial tours and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure snacks were passed out after dinner/before bed. The findings include: 1. Resident #14 's diagnosis included cerebral palsy, chronic kidney disease, and bipolar disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #14 was cognitively intact, and dependent assist for showering, dressing, personal hygiene, and repositioning. The MDS further identified Resident #14 required a set up for eating. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/6/25 identified Resident #14 had an activities of daily living risk related to paralysis and cerebral palsy with intervention that included to provide a mechanical lift for transfers with assistance of 2, Resident #14 was non ambulatory and was to be provided set up assistance for meals. On 4/1/25 at 10:22 AM during initial tour Resident #14 identified that she/he was not always offered a snack and at times Resident #14 would want a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for four sampled residents (Resident #59, Resident #81, Resident #90 and Resident #100) reviewed for mistreatment, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident altercations between Resident #59 and Resident #81, and between Resident #90 and Resident #100. Additionally, for four of eight residents (Residents #27, #40, #62 and #99) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the residents were free from neglect and that care was provided in a timely manner on 3/8/2025 during the 7 AM to 3 PM shift. The findings include: 1a. Resident #59 was admitted to the facility in September of 2022 with diagnoses that included dementia, anxiety, and dysphagia. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #59 was severely cognitively impaired, had verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others, had the behavior of wandering, and was independent with eating, bed mobility and transfers. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to conduct a complete investigation for a resident with an injury of unknown origin. The findings include: Resident #9 was admitted to the facility in October of 2024 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (one sided muscle paralysis) affecting the right dominant side, hypertension, and diabetes. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #9 was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff for toileting and required maximum assistance for personal hygiene and bed mobility and transfers. The MDS further identified Resident #9 with an impairment on one side of his/her upper extremity and lower extremities and used a walker and wheelchair for ambulation. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/24/24, identified Resident #9 required extensive assistance of 1 staff member for self-care tasks due to weakness,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #104) reviewed for recreational activities, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan regarding Resident #104's activity needs and preferences. The findings include: Resident #104 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, diabetes, combined forms of age-related bilateral cataracts, and hypertension. An activities admission assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #104's past interests included drawing/painting, fishing, traveling, sports, movies, concerts, cooking, and listening to music. The Resident Care Plan dated 11/24/24 identified Resident #104 had impaired visual function related to visual loss in left eye from previous stroke and bilateral cataracts. Interventions included one-on-one visits from staff. An admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #104 with a severe…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES — 42 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT