Maefair Center For Health & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 112 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 134 beds and averages 126.3 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who had a history of wandering throughout the facility and self-propelled in a wheelchair, the facility failed to ensure the resident was accounted for after an alarmed door was triggered. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia, anxiety, and depression. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three (3) indicating short and long-term memory recall deficits, was dependent on staff for transfers and utilized a wheelchair for mobilization. The Resident Care Plan dated 12/10/24 identified Resident #1 was at risk for falls due to dementia, had a history of wandering throughout the unit while self-mobilizing in a wheelchair and at times attempted to open exit doors. Interventions directed assistance of one (1) with transfers, use of a wander guard, assist…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for elopement, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent the resident from exiting through a door that was ajar during a recreation activity. Resident #1 was observed outside in the parking lot by another resident. The failures resulted in a finding of Immediate Jeopardy. The finding includes: Resident #1's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. The Elopement Evaluation performed on 7/6/24 identified a score of three (3) indicating Resident #1 was at risk for wandering and elopement. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severely impaired cognition and was independent with ambulation. The Resident Care Plan dated 7/31/24 identified Resident #1 was at risk to try and leave the nursing facility due to verbalized expressions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility policy and interview for 1 sampled resident (Resident #368) reviewed for Advanced Directives, the facility failed to ensure the resident signed Advance Directives were reflected correctly on the Electronic Medical Record (EMR. The findings include: Resident #368 's diagnoses included atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) and anxiety. Review of Resident #368 paper chart indicated a code status signed on [DATE] directing Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). The care plan with a revision dated [DATE] identified the resident has an established Advanced Directive. Residents wish to receive Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). Interventions included reviewing Advanced Directives with resident and/ or healthcare decision maker quarterly and to support residents' decision for CPR. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #368 was moderately cognitively…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical reviews, observations and review of facility documentation and interviews for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for the environment (Resident #82), the facility did not provide a homelike environment by not ensuring personal care equipment was stored appropriately and for 1 of 2 residents ( Resident # 68) ) reviewed for Environment, the facility failed to ensure residents room was free from odors in order to ensure a home like environment. The findings included: 1. Resident #82's diagnoses included pelvic fracture and dementia. A significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #82 as severely cognitive impairment and dependent on staff for toileting. The MDS assessment also identified Resident #82 had a urinary catheter and noted continent of bowel. A care plan dated 3/10/2025 identified Resident #82 had a deficit in functional mobility and that the resident was non-ambulatory. Interventions On 4/23/2025 at 1:51 PM an interview with (Person ----) identified a concern about the smell…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, observation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medication, the facility failed to ensure medication was administered according to physician's orders. The findings include: Resident #14's diagnoses included Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) without esophagitis, Type 2 diabetes mellitus and bipolar disorder. The care plan dated 1/14/25 identified resident is at risk for constipation. Interventions included administering medication as ordered, monitoring bowel movement. The resident care plan also identified Resident #14 utilization of psychotropic medications related to bipolar disorder. Interventions include orthostatic blood pressure as ordered. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #14 was cognitively intact and required supervision or touching assistance for eating. The assessment noted dependence on staff for toilet hygiene. Observation of 4/19/25 of the Medication Administration Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 4 residents (Resident #38) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure a safe transfer with a mechanical lift per manufacture specifications to prevent a potential accident. The findings include: Resident #38's diagnoses include morbid obesity, Intellectual Disabilities, and osteoarthritis. The Resident Care Plan with a revision date of 3/1/25 identified the resident had a deficit in functional mobility. Interventions included a mechanical lift for transfers. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #38 as cognitively intact and depended on staff with transferring, personal hygiene and bathing. An observation on 4/23/25 of the mechanical lift transfer at 11:05 AM identified the nurse aides (NA# 5 and NA# 6) did not open the base of the mechanical lift before getting Resident #38 out of bed. In an interview with NA #5 on 4/23/25 at 11:10 AM identified she did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and staff interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #75) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure staff obtained weekly weights and a re-weight as ordered by the physician. The findings include: Resident #75's diagnosis included sepsis, chronic osteomyelitis, a stage 4 pressure ulcer and a urinary tract infection. A physician's order dated 12/9/2024 directed to obtain weight on admission then weekly x 4 weeks. The care plan dated 12/12/2024 indicated Resident #75 was at risk for malnutrition due to variable intake, grade 3 obesity, and a pressure wound. Interventions included: allowing sufficient time to eat, encouraging intake of fluids throughout the day, monitoring and evaluating weight and weight changes and obtaining weights as indicated. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #75 was cognitively intact, weighed 180 pounds and did not have a 5% weight loss or gain in the last 30 days or 10 % in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, the facility failed and staff interviews, the facility failed to discard expired medications in a timely manner and for 1 or 4 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to adequately secure medications. The findings included: 1. On 4/28/2025 at 11:41 AM, an observation of the Intravenous Therapy (IV) cart located in the third-floor medication room with the Infection Preventionist (RN #7) identified two bags of expired IV fluids. The fluids were 1-liter bags of 10% dextrose, both bags with an expiration date of March 2025. An interview with RN #7 indicated that the fluids were usually used for residents who were waiting for their total parental nutrition (TN) to arrive. RN#7 also indicated the night supervisor was responsible for checking the IV cart for expired medications. On 4/28/2025 at 11:53 AM, an observation with RN#7 and the nursing supervisor (RN#1) identified two expired tablets in the emergency stock box located in the third-floor medication room. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
  Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical reviews, observations, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 1 sampled resident, (Resident #61) reviewed for dental services, the facility failed to follow up on a recommendation made by a physician regarding dental. The findings include: Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included pulmonary embolism (blood clot in lungs), unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, and depression. The physician's orders dated 11/30/22 directed for consult: dental care as needed. A review of the facility dental vendor visit dated 1/29/24 with Resident #61 identified a lump/lesion on lower right side of lip. A recommendation was made that the lesion on the lower lip be evaluated by an oral surgeon. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #61 was cognitively intact and required setup/clean up assistance with eating, maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort) with personal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #96) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from neglect and failed to ensure care was provided timely. The findings include: Resident #96 had a diagnosis of hemiparesis (weakness on one side) and vascular dementia. The Annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #96 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating moderately impaired cognition and required maximal assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/3/2025 identified incontinence. Interventions directed two (2) staff members to provide care for left sided weakness and accusatory behaviors, and provide incontinent care. Facility incident report dated 4/11/2025 identified Resident #96 alleged on 4/11/2025 at approximately 2:45 PM he/she had the call light on for 45 minutes, and alleged that he/she did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #96) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure care was provided in accordance with the plan of care. The findings include: Resident #96 had a diagnosis of hemiparesis (weakness on one side) and vascular dementia. The Annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #96 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating moderately impaired cognition and required maximal assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/3/2025 identified incontinence. Interventions directed two (2) staff members to provide care for left sided weakness and accusatory behaviors, and provide incontinent care. Facility incident report dated 4/11/2025 identified Resident #96 alleged on 4/11/2025 at approximately 2:45 PM he/she had the call light on for 45 minutes, and alleged that he/she did not receive ADL care from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #96) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the record was complete and accurate to include incontinent care provided. The findings include: Resident #96 had a diagnosis of hemiparesis (weakness on one side) and vascular dementia. The Annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #96 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating moderately impaired cognition and required maximal assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/3/2025 identified incontinence. Interventions directed two (2) staff members to provide care for left sided weakness and accusatory behaviors, and provide incontinent care. Facility incident report dated 4/11/2025 identified Resident #96 alleged on 4/11/2025 at approximately 2:45 PM he/she had the call light on for 45 minutes, and alleged that he/she did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$25,366 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-03-19
• $8,021 — penalty dated 2024-08-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES — 42 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 67 rows in the source record cover these 44 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

27 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT