The Pines at Rutland Center for Nursing & Rehabili

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 324 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 94 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 115.2 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.00 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.06 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.15 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents resulting in harm to one resident [Res.#59] of 6 sampled residents. Findings include: Per review of Res.#59's medical record, the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included generalized muscle weakness, cerebral infarction [stroke], seizures, and dementia. Review of Res.#59's Care Plan reveals the resident was identified as at risk for falls related to a history of falls, dementia, hemiplegia [one-sided paralysis], anxiety, depression, and medications associated with increased fall risk. Regarding toilet use, the Care Plan records Res.#59 requires extensive assistance and sit to stand by 2 staff for toileting. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing [DON] on 9/18/24 at 10:02 AM. The DON stated that Licensed Nursing Assistants [LNAs] receive training during orientation regarding following a resident's [NAME]. [the '[NAME]' is a documentation system that enables…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to inform a resident representative in advance of the risks and benefits of the proposed care, the treatment alternatives, or other options for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #86). Findings include:During an interview with the Resident's responsible party, on 9/30/202 at 9:24 AM, s/he said they had concerns with the number of falls that the Resident had been experiencing. S/he wonders what they are doing to prevent her/him from falling. S/he stated that s/he is concerned because they started her/him on a new medication to help her/him sleep at night. When asked what medication s/he was referring to s/he stated that s/he did not know but s/he worried that there was a reason for the falls that the Resident had been experiencing and the medicine would just make her/him sleep. Per record review a physician's order dated 8/28/2025 states Trazodone 25mg every 24 hours as needed for insomnia for 14 days at bedtime as needed for insomnia. Review of Resident #86's August and September Medication Administration Records (MARs)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's representative of changes of condition for 1 of 28 residents in the sample (Resident #86). Findings include: Per observations made on 9/30/2025 at 12:50 PM, Resident #86 was seen self-propelling in their wheelchair attempting to leave the dining room. S/he was bare foot, and it was noted by the surveyors that s/he had a bruise on his/her right foot and toes. When asked what had happened to the Resident's foot, the Unit Manager (UM) stated that it happened when s/he was playing with her/his footboard and it fell off the bed and landed on her/his foot.During a phone interview with the Resident #86's Representative, on 9/30/25 at 9:24 AM, s/he said they had concerns with the number of falls that the Resident had been experiencing. S/he wondered what they are doing to prevent her/him from falling. S/he stated that s/he is concerned because they started her/him on a new medication to help her/him sleep at night. When asked what medication s/he was referring to s/he stated that s/he did not know…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to create a comprehensive care plan related to incontinence care for 1 of 28 residents in a standard survey sample (Resident #64). Findings include:Per record review, Resident #64 was admitted with diagnoses that include paraplegia [paralysis of lower extremities], cognitive communication deficit, and anoxic brain injury, (a brain injury caused by a complete lack of oxygen to the brain). Resident has a BIMS score of 15 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, cognitive assessment indicating resident is cognitively intact). Per interview with Resident #64 on 9/30/2025 at 10:24 AM, s/he stated they are always incontinent of bowels and do not have sensation or knowledge of incontinence. The Resident stated they are not checked for incontinence after AM care, which occurs between 8:00 AM-10:00 AM, until 6:00 PM when they are assisted with PM care and helped back to bed. Per record review, Resident #64's Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] indicates the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure quality of care for 1 of 28 residents in a standard survey sample (Resident #15).Findings include:Per record review, Resident #15 has a medical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus with diabetic retinopathy [an eye disease that affects the retina and can lead to vision loss and blindness]. Resident #15's physician order for blood sugar monitoring reads: Nurse to check finger stick PRN [as needed], every 8 hours as needed for Prophylaxis, Finger sticks for Blood Sugar before meals and at bedtime for diabetic management.Per record review, Resident #15's care plan states, Resident has impaired visual function, has diagnosis of retinopathy. Has difficulty with large print but is able to do own blood sugar readings when placing monitor close to eyes, Nursing will read glucometer after resident checks their own blood glucose with an approved glucometer. Per record review of resident's face sheet, Special Instructions: meds WHOLE with THIN liquids; resident may NOT use their own glucometer; they can poke…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent potential injury for 1 of 28 residents in the sample (Resident #86). Findings include: Review of Resident # 86's care plan revealed a care plan focus initiated on 5/1/2025 of risk for falls with and without injuries r/t, Parkinsons with dementia, Polyosteoarthritis, epilepsy, anemia and mild cognitive impairment, dependence on staff for ADL's [activities of daily living]. use of medications associated with increased risk for falls, impulsivity, and often sits on the floor and incontinence. An intervention initiated on 8/22/2025 states keep [Resident] out of other residents rooms.Per observation on 9/30/2025 at 12:50 PM, Resident #86 was seen self-propelling in their wheelchair attempting to leave the dining room. S/he was bare foot, and it was noted by the surveyors that s/he had a bruise on her right foot and toes.During a phone interview with the Resident #86's responsible party, on 9/30/202 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct a trauma informed care assessment to establish possible triggers for re-traumatization for 1 of 2 residents in the sample (Resident #49). Findings include: During unit observations on 9/30/2025 at 10:02 AM Resident #49 was heard from the hall screaming and yelling out obscenities. S/He was found sitting in her/his wheelchair in her/his own bathroom alone. When asked if s/he was okay, s/he swore and said, no I am not ok. When asked if s/he needed help s/he said yes, now get the [expletive] out! The Resident continued screaming until a staff member was approached by a surveyor and was told that the Resident was alone in her/his bathroom screaming out. The staff member stated that this was not unusual behavior for the Resident. Per record review, Resident #49 has a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Review of the Resident's care plan revealed a care plan focus of mood problem r/t [related to] anxiety, PTSD, and [history] of passive [suicidal ideation] last revised on 7/18/2025. The care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff properly air-dried or hand dried pans prior to storage and failed to maintain a clean sanitary food service area. Findings include: During an observation on 11/25/24 at 2:05 PM, there was a baking sheet that was stacked on other baking sheets that was noted to be wet. The baking sheet was placed on the counter by this surveyor and the steam table pans were inspected. There was a wet small steam table pan that had been stacked on others. At this time the Director of Dietary was shown the small steam table pan and when this surveyor was attempting to show her/him the baking sheet it had been removed from the counter and placed back on top of the stacked sheets. The Director of Dietary confirmed that the baking sheet and the steam table pan that had been cleaned and stacked for use were still wet. The pans were found to have been stacked wet and not allowed to air dry prior to stacking. The Director of Dietary went into the dish room and returned stating, I just educated [dietary staff member] not to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-18 · tag F0554 — pattern
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident for the ability to self-administer medications and initiate a care plan related to self-administration of medications for 2 of 8 sampled residents (Residents #82 and #92). Findings include: 1. Per interview on 9/16/24 at approximately 11:30 AM, Resident #92 was observed to have two medications in her/his room, the first called Mannitol Supplement (the label indicates it is a supplement that is useful to prevent urinary tract infections) and and the second was an Albuterol Inhaler (used to treat difficulty breathing) on the windowsill. When s/he was asked what the medications were, s/he explained that family members bring in the Mannitol supplement as s/he has a history of urinary tract infections. S/he uses the Albuterol inhaler to prevent wheezing. S/he tells the nursing staff when s/he uses the inhaler and has not discussed the Mannitol so far. Resident #92 confirmed that s/he does not have a lock box to store his/her medications. Per interview on 9/18/2024 at approximately 8:06 AM with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Per interview and record review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living care (ADL) based on resident preference for 1 of 32 sampled residents (Resident #11). Findings include: Per record review, Resident #11's care plan reads, [Resident #11] has an ADL self-care performance deficit [related to] Quadriplegia [paralysis of all four limbs], with the following interventions, DRESSING: [extensive] assistance by 1 staff to dress, revised on 8/21/22, and TRANSFER: Mechanical sist to stand Lift with extensive assist of 2 staff for transfers, revised on 5/26/24. On 7/16/24, Resident #11 was assessed to have a BIMS of 15 (brief interview for mental status; a cognitive assessment score indicating cognitive intactness). Per interview on 9/17/24 at 9:50 AM, Resident #11 stated that s/he prefers to get up by 8:00 AM or before breakfast. S/He explained that this preference is not always honored, as aides do not start his/her morning care until 9:00 AM about 1-3 times a week, and on a few occasions 10 AM or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet each resident's needs for 1 of 32 sampled residents (Resident #11). Findings include: Per record review, Resident #11 has diagnoses that include quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs) and muscle spasms. On 7/16/24, Resident #11 was assessed to have a BIMS of 15 (brief interview for mental status; a cognitive assessment score indicating cognitive intactness). On 9/18/24 at 10:47 AM, Resident #11 explained that for months, s/he misses 1-2 doses a month of his/her Finasteride and Dantrolene because the medications are not available from the pharmacy. S/He expressed that s/he is very frustrating because it has become a pattern, staff have not addressed the issue, and it continues to happen. Per record review, Resident #11 has a physician order for Dantrolene Sodium Oral Capsule 25 MG 1 capsule by mouth for muscle spasms, twice a day starting 11/30/23 and changing to three times a day starting on 8/22/24. Per review of Resident #11's Medication Administration Records (MAR) from 6/1/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,512 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,512 — penalty dated 2024-09-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES — 42 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VT