Winship Green Center for Health & Rehab, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 102 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 66.0 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.01 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to have as needed medication readily available for resident use in a timely manner and failed to follow physician orders related to medication administration for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for medications (Resident #1 and #12).Findings:1. On 3/10/26 the Division of Licensing received a complaint regarding Resident #1 not having access to his/her respiratory medication (Acetylcysteine) in a timely manner. The complainant states Resident #1 had asked for this medication multiple days before he/she was able to receive it.Review of Resident #1 clinical record contained the following physician orders; Acetylcysteine Inhalation Solution 10% with instructions reading 200 milligram inhale orally every 6 hours as needed for PNA (pneumonia), ordered on 2/19/26 and discontinued on 2/25/26. A new order for Acetylcysteine Inhalation Solution 10% with instructions to inhale 10 ml orally every 6 hours as needed for PNA on 2/25/26. Ipatropium-Albuterol Solution 0.5-2.5 (3) MG/3ML with instructions to inhale 1 vial orally 4 times a day for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the confidentiality of protected health information for 10 of 67 residents during 1 of 1 day of survey (Resident #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, and #11).Findings:1. On 3/23/26 from 8:12 a.m. to 8:15 a.m., a surveyor observed an unattended treatment cart on the Pemaquid Unit with a staff members assignment sheet on it, face up. The assignment sheet contained personal medical information regarding Resident #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, and #11. It was visible and easily accessible to residents, visitors, and unauthorized personnel. Environmental Service staff and Certified Nursing Assistance were noted nearby.On 3/23/26 at 8:16 a.m., through surveyor intervention, the assignment sheet was properly taken care of by a Licensed Practical Nurse, who at this time confirmed the assignment sheet should not be left in the open and should have been in a secure location.2. On3/23/26 from 3:35 p.m. to 3:41p.m., a surveyor observed an unattended medication cart on the Pemaquid Unit with a staff members assignment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure written bed hold and transfer/discharge notices were provided to the resident or their legal representative for a facility-initiated transfer/discharge for 1 of 3 sampled residents who were transferred/discharged to an acute care facility (Residents #1). Findings:1. Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated that he/she was transferred to an acute hospital on 3/8/26 and subsequently admitted . The clinical record lacked evidence that the facility issued a written bed hold notice and a transfer/discharge notice to the resident and/or legal representative. On 3/23/26 at 1:30 p.m., the above was confirmed with the Director of Nursing.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0646 — isolated
  Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of a significant change in condition for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for a significant change in condition. (Resident #1)Findings:A review of Resident #1's entire clinical record showed he/she was transferred to the emergency room on 3/8/26 and was subsequently admitted to the hospital for difficulty breathing. Further review of the clinical record lacked evidence that the physician was notified of Resident #1's transfer to the hospital.Review of the facilities Change of Condition Policy and Procedure states The facility must inform the resident, consult with the resident's healthcare provider, and if known, notify the resident's legal representative or family member when there is. A decision to transfer or discharge the resident from the facility Further review of the policy states Physician/family notification must be documented in the electronic health record.On 3/23/36 at 1:30 p.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed there is no documentation in the resident's electronic medical record that showed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide evidence that the Resident Representative was informed of a physician order for an antipsychotic medication, informed of the side effects of that medication and given the opportunity to agree or disagree with the use of medication for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (#1). Finding: A review of the clinical record Resident #1 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. admission diagnoses included Urinary Tract Infection, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Delirium, Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Kidney Disease, Major Depressive Disorder, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, Congestive Heart Failure, Aortic Stenosis, and a history of frequent falls. On 12/25/24, Resident #1 experienced agitation, increased confusion and became aggressive and combative to staff and other residents. Efforts to redirect were ineffective and Resident #1 was transferred to the Emergency Department via…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0576 — pattern
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, the facility failed to deliver resident mail in a timely manner to 2 out of 4 residents who receive mail in the facility. ( #48 and #63) Findings: Reviewed Policy titled: Therapeutic Recreation last revised 10/2023 that states Ensure that mail is delivered to the person unopened or postmarked (for outgoing mail) within 24 hours, including Saturday. On 7/11/24 at 10:45 a.m., in an interview with with Resident #48 and Resident #63, stated they are not receiving their mail for 2 or 3 days after it arrives at the facility. On 7/11/24 at 11:00 a.m., in an interview with the Activities Director, stated that Activities deliver the mail but they have to wait until the Business Office sorts it and that can take a few days. On 7/11/24 at 11:20 a.m., in an interview with the Business Office Manager, the staff confirmed that sometimes mail doesn't get delivered within 24 hours, especially Saturday's mail. They stated that getting the mail sorted and out to residents timely has been a known challenge because residents have complained.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to provide/obtain residents/representatives written information concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and/or formulate an advance directive for 8 of 23 residents reviewed for advanced directives ( #10, #35, #46, #67, #37, #9, #63 and #23). Findings: 1. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #10's clinical record lacked evidence that the facility provided/obtained resident and/or resident's representative written information concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and/or formulate an advance directive. During an interview on 7/9/24 at 11:10 a.m., Resident #10's family member indicated he/she is legal guardian and has documentation but has never been asked to supply it. 2. Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #35's clinical record lacked evidence that the facility provided/obtained resident and/or resident's representative…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately maintain maintenance services necessary to maintain the facility in good repair and sanitary condition for the ceiling air vents and surrounding ceiling tiles, all unit shower rooms, and bathrooms in rooms [ROOM NUMBER] on the [NAME] Unit. Findings: 1. On 7/9/24 at 8:00 a.m., a surveyor observed that all the ceiling vents in all hallways and in the main dining room have a moderate to heavy buildup of black material on the vents and on the ceiling surrounding the vents for 3 of 3 Resident units. This was confirmed with the Administrator at that time. 2. On 7/10/24 at 10:00 a.m., during the facility tour with the Administrator and the Maintenance Manager, the following were observed: Passport Unit - The Shower room has a moderate to heavy buildup of black substance on shower grout. Pemaquid Unit - The Shower room has brown stain on shower room floor and buildup of black substance on shower grout. room [ROOM NUMBER], the bathroom contains…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, and policy review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan by an interdisciplinary team (IDT) meeting, which included the participation of the resident and resident's representative, after each Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments, for 6 of 6 residents whose care plans were reviewed (#16, #10, #13, #26, #23, #31). Findings: 1. A surveyor reviewed the clinical documentation of Resident #16, which included review of a comprehensive Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], 3/8/24 and 6/8/324. The surveyor could not locate evidence, after completion of the above 3 MDS assessments, that a care plan meeting was held by the IDT that included, to the extent possible, participation of Resident #16 and/or his/her representative to review and revise the care plan. On 7/10/24 at 9:46 a.m., during an interview with the Social Services Director (SW), she confirmed the above IDT meetings were not completed. 2. A surveyor reviewed the clinical documentation of Resident #10, which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, failed to ensure foods were dated/ labeled and stored appropriately for 2 of 3 survey days (kitchen and Pemaquid dining room), failed to ensure that the freezers and refrigerator's temperatures were monitored appropriately. This has the potential to affect all residents that eat food prepared by kitchen staff. Findings: 1. On 7/8/24 between 6:04 p.m., and 6:21 p.m., a surveyor and the cook completed an initial tour of the kitchen which revealed the following: Observation of 3 door refrigerator noted the following: - Individual sliced yellow cheese wrapped in saran wrap, undated, unlabeled and available for use. -clear squeeze bottle of yellow substance, undated, unlabeled and available for use. -plastic container of chopped red chili peppers, undated, unlabeled and available for use. -Clear plastic container containing biscuits covered with saran wrap unlabeled, undated and available for use. -Gallon jar of ranch dressing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES — 42 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 50 rows in the source record cover these 38 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

16 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ME