Brentwood Center For Health & Rehabilitation, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 109 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 77.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 71.4 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.17 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately maintain the facility in good repair and sanitary condition for 4 of 4 Units. (Passport, LTC both Long Hall and Short Hall, Eagle, and Sebago). Findings:1.On 3/2/26 between 9:00 a.m. - 9:10 a.m., a surveyor observed missing tiles in Whirlpool room near Sebago and Eagle units. Observed multiple areas of frayed carpet and dirty carpet all throughout the facility. Eagle Unit Dining Room has marred walls. 2. On 3/2/26 at approximately 2:00 p.m., a surveyor observed the following: room [ROOM NUMBER]A - The wall is marredroom [ROOM NUMBER]- Hand Sanitizer on wall is missing cover. room [ROOM NUMBER]A - The heater on wall is missing the cover and is exposed, and the sheet rock is unpainted. 3. On 3/4/26 - 12:10 p.m. during observational rounds with Administrator, the following were observed and confirmed: The carpeting in both Passport/Long Term Care Hall and the Eagle/Sebago Hall is badly worn and stained. room [ROOM NUMBER]A - The overbed light…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-04 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure written bed hold and transfer/discharge notices were provided to the resident or their legal representative for a facility-initiated transfer/discharge for 2 of 3 sampled residents transferred/discharged to an acute care facility (Residents #8, #9). In addition, the facility failed to ensure residents had a discharge summary which included recapitulation of the resident's stay, diagnoses, course of illness/treatment or therapy, and reconciliation of all pre-discharge medications with the resident's post-discharge medications (both prescribed and over-the-counter) for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for transfer discharge. (Residents #96 and #97)Findings: 1. Documentation in Resident 8's clinical record indicated that he/she was transferred to an acute hospital on [DATE] and subsequently admitted . The clinical record lacked evidence that the facility issued a written bed hold notice and a transfer/discharge notice to the resident and/or legal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to review and revise the care plans by an interdisciplinary team (IDT), that included, to the extent possible, participation of the residents and/or his/her representative after each assessment for 3 of 24 residents reviewed for care planning (Residents #7, #66, and #68).Findings: 1. Review of Resident #7's medical record contained a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) version 3.0 dated 1/14/26. The clinical record lacked evidence of his/her IDT meeting being held within 7 days of the Quarterly MDS assessment. On 3/4/26 at 1:40 p.m., the Regional Director of Operations confirmed Resident #7's IDT meeting was not held within 7 days of completion of his/her Quarterly MDS. 2. Review of Resident #66's medical record contained a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) version 3.0 dated 12/30/25. The clinical record lacked evidence of his/her IDT meeting being held within 7 days of completion of the quarterly MDS assessment. On 3/4/26 at 1:40 p.m., in an interview with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards related to broken floor heaters for 2 of 3 days of survey.Findings:1. On 3/2/26 at 10:15 a.m., observations of floor radiators missing the coverings exposing piping and sharp metal fins in rooms [ROOM NUMBER].On 3/2/26 at 10:37 a.m., the above information was confirmed with the Maintenance Director.2. On 3/3/26 at 7:02 a.m., observation of a broken radiator exposing piping and sharp metal fins in the TV room on the Passport Unit. At this time, it was observed with the Director of Clinical Operations.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient direct care staff were scheduled and on duty to meet the needs of all residents residing in the facility. This has the potential to affect all residents needing assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's).Findings:Review of Payroll Based Journal staffing report revealed the facility triggered for Excessively Low Weekend Staffing during the fourth quarter 4 (July 1, 2025 through September 30, 2025).On 3/2/25 at 1:35 p.m., review of weekend staffing from July 1, 2025 through September 30, 2025 with the Facility Administrator, it was confirmed that the facility did not have enough staff to meet resident needs on the shifts they were short.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations and interviews the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation and failed to ensure that two people who are authorized to administer medications signed the Shift Count page indicating that they counted all controlled substances at the change of shift for multiple shifts, on 4 of 4 medication cart narcotic bound books reviewed (Eagle unit, Passport unit Short Hall and Kitchen Hall).Findings:1. Eagle unit Controlled Substance Book #2 with shift counts were reviewed, which indicated the facility counts at the change of each shift, approx. 3 times a day. The person authorized to administer medications coming on duty and/or the person authorized to administer medications going off duty both failed to sign the Shift Count page of the Controlled Substances Book that indicated the controlled substances count was done on the following dates: 6/22/25, 9/5/25, 9/12/25, 9/24/25, 10/26/25, 12/14/25, 1/5/26, 1/6/26, 1/8/26, 1/15/26, 1/25/26,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to adequately date and properly dispose of open medications according to manufacturer specifications and failed to ensure expired medications were removed from the supply available for use for 3 of 3 medication carts observed (Eagle, Passport and Kitchen hall medication carts), and 1 of 4 medication rooms observed (Sebago Unit), and the facility's Pixis machine (an automated, secure, medication dispensing cabinet used to manage, store, and track pharmaceuticals).Findings:1. On 3/2/26 at 8:26 a.m., observation of the Sebago medication room with Registered Nurse (RN) #1 the following medications were expired and available for use:1 bottle of Lactaid tabs with expiration date of 12/251 bottle of Vitamin B6 tabs with expiration date of 7/251 bottle of Aspirin 325mg (milligram) with expiration date of 1/26. 2. On 3/2/26 at 8:44 a.m., observation of the Eagle unit medication cart with RN #2 the following medications were expired and/or unlabeled with open or discard date and available for use:2 bottles of Naproxen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were organized and updated to reflect resident's current needs by failing to discontinue inactive physician orders for 2 of 7 sampled residents. (Resident #5 and #23)Findings:1. On 3/2/26 at 7:47 a.m., and on 3/3/26 at 9:10 a.m., Resident #5 was observed receiving oxygen via a nasal cannula with the oxygen concentrator set at 1.5 liters per minute.Resident #5's active provider orders, as of 3/3/26, contain three orders for oxygen:> Oxygen at 2 liters per minute as needed to maintain oxygen saturation level at 90 percent. Active 5/10/25> Oxygen at 2 liters per minute as needed for shortness of breath Indicate O2 Sats (%), Start and Stop Times in Supplementary Documentation. Active 5/10/25.> Oxygen at 2 liters per minute continuous every shift for shortness of breath. Active 5/10/25.2. On 3/2/26 at 11:50 a.m., during a resident representative interview for Resident #23, it was discussed that Resident #23 had been on hospice for years but is no longer receiving hospice services.Review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and policy reviews the facility failed to maintain an Infection Control Program designed to help prevent the cross contamination and/or development of infection for residents requiring Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), failing to wear correct Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during tracheostomy care, and failing to properly label and store urinal collection devices for 2 of 3 days of survey, on 3 of 3 units (Residents #7, #9, and #73). Findings: 1. On 3/2/26 at 7:59 a.m., observation of Resident #7 in his/her room with an indwelling catheter. Further observations showed no evidence of appropriate EBP signage. On 3/3/26 at 10:00 a.m., in an interview, the Infection Preventionist (IP) confirmed the above information. 2. On 3/3/36 at 7:05 a.m., observation of 2 unlabeled urinals hanging on the side rail by the toilet in the Passport Unit shower room. At this time, the above information was confirmed with the Director of Clinical Operations. 3. On 3/2/26 at 8:25 a.m. during an interview with Resident #73 he/she stated they have a catheter and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call bell was within reach for 1 of 1 sampled resident for 2 of 3 days of survey (Resident #59).Findings:1. On 3/2/26 at 7:45 a.m., Resident #59 was observed lying in bed with the call bell wrapped around the bed rail facing outside the bed rail, and not within reach for the resident.On 3/2/26 at 7:48 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #5 confirmed in an interview with the surveyor that the resident could not reach her call bell. 2. On 3/3/26 at 1:35 p.m., Resident #59 was observed lying in bed with the call bell on the floor, and not within reach for the resident.On 3/3/26 at 1:37 p.m., Registered Nurse #1 in an interview with a surveyor, confirmed the above finding.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES — 42 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 50 rows in the source record cover these 38 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

16 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ME