Huntington Hills Center for Health and Rehabilitat

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 1,376 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 277 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 320 beds and averages 306.7 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.81 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint # NY 00356442 ) initiated on 11/6/2024 and completed on 11/15/2024, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff were available to provide nursing services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing of each resident. This was identified for eight of eight nursing units during the Sufficient Staffing Task. Specifically, 1) a review of the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report Quarter three, 2024 (April 1st- June 30th) and the weekend of 11/9/2024 to 11/10/2024 indicated excessively low weekend staffing; 2) a review of the daily staffing sheets revealed the facility did not provide sufficient number of Licensed Nurses as indicated in the Facility Assessment; 3) during the Resident Council meeting dated 11/7/2024, three of thirteen resident attendees verbalized concerns regarding short staffing on weekends. This is a repeat deficiency. Cross Reference: F 835 Administration F 838 Facility Assessment The findings are:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-15 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint # NY 00356442 ) initiated on 11/6/2024 and completed on 11/15/2024, the facility was not administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, the facility was not effectively administered to ensure sufficient staffing was provided to promote the highest practicable physical mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The Facility Assessment did not include the overall number of facility staff needed to ensure that each resident's needs were being met. Additionally, the Administrator did not monitor and enhance the quality of care and services by repeating the same deficiencies: F 695 Respiratory/Tracheostomy Care and Suctioning, F 725 Sufficient Nursing Staff, and F 838 Facility Assessment. Cross Reference: F 725 Sufficient…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 11/6/2024 and completed on 11/15/2024, the facility did not ensure its Facility Assessment considered specific staffing needs for each shift and each resident unit (first floor and second floor) in the facility. Specifically, the Facility Assessment, last updated in February 2024, did not include a breakdown of staffing needs for each of the facility's eight units for each shift. Cross Reference: F 725 Sufficient Nursing Staff F 835 Administration The finding is: The Facility Assessment, dated 2/25/2024, documented based on data from several sources including multiple nursing home associations, census-based staffing levels would be approximately one nurse (Registered Nurse or Licensed Practical Nurse) assigned to eight to ten residents and approximately one aide (Certified Nursing Aide) assigned to ten to fifteen residents. The Facility Assessment further explained: -For a Census of 20 residents with low acuity, there should be two Nurses and three Certified Nurse Assistants; with medium…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY 00331241) initiated on 11/06/2024 and completed on 11/15/2024 the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations, including injuries of unknown source, were reported not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not include abuse or do not result in a serious bodily injury, to the New York State Department of Health. This was identified for one (Resident #54) of five residents reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, Resident #54 reported that a nurse erroneously administered an injectable medication to the resident's abdominal area. Upon assessment, the resident had a bruise on the lower left side of the abdomen. The facility investigation documented there was inconclusive evidence to determine if the resident erroneously received an injectable and the cause of the bruise was unknown. The facility did not report the injury of unknown origin incident to the New York State Department of Health.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 11/6/2024 and completed on 11/15/2023, the facility did not ensure that Residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice. This was identified for one (Resident #236 ) of two residents reviewed for Respiratory care. Specifically, Resident #236 had a physician's order to receive 4 liters per minute of supplemental oxygen. The resident was observed receiving oxygen at a liter flow less than the current physician's order. The finding is: The facility's policy for Oxygen, revised on 2/2022, documented that oxygen is administered by licensed staff under a physician's order to oxygenate and provide comfort to residents' acute or chronic respiratory difficulties. The procedure includes checking the physician's orders for oxygen administration, the prescribed liter flow rate, and the frequency of oxygen administration. Resident # 236 was admitted with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0711 — isolated
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during a Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY 00350913) initiated on 11/6/2024 and completed on 11/15/2024, the facility did not ensure the Physician reviewed the resident's total program of care at each visit. This was identified for one (Resident #187) of two residents reviewed for Mood and Behavior. Specifically, Resident #187 with a diagnosis of Dementia but no prior history of physical aggression, punched another resident on 5/15/2024 and was ordered for psychiatric evaluation on 5/15/2024. The psychiatric consult was never completed. There is no documented evidence that the Physician followed up on the resident's psychiatric evaluation during their monthly visit in June 2024 and July 2024. Resident #187 subsequently bit another resident on 8/9/2024. The Psychiatrist assessed and evaluated the resident on 8/20/2024 and recommended Lexapro (Medication to treat Anxiety and Depression) 2.5 milligrams once a day. The finding is: The policy and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0840 — isolated
  Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record review conducted during a Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY 00350913) initiated on 11/6/2024 and completed on 11/15/2024, the facility did not ensure that timely arrangements were made for outside services that met professional standards. This was identified for one (Resident #187) of two residents reviewed for Mood and Behavior. Specifically, Resident #187 with a diagnosis of Dementia but no prior history of physical aggression, punched another resident on 5/15/2024 and was ordered for psychiatric evaluation on 5/15/2024. There is no documented evidence that the psychiatric consult was completed until 8/20/2024 after Resident #187 bit another resident on 8/9/2024. The finding is: The facility did not develop policy and procedures related to outside consultant. Resident #187 was admitted with diagnoses including Dementia, Hyperlipidemia, and Hypertension. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 11/6/2024 and completed on 11/15/2024, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was identified for two (Resident #627 and Resident #625) of three residents reviewed for Transmission Based Precautions. Specifically, during observation of Resident #627 and Resident #625's shared room, an Isolation Droplet/Contact Precaution sign was observed outside the door for positive COVID-19 (Coronavirus-2019) infection. The precaution signage included instructions for the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) including N95 respirator mask, gloves, a gown, and eye protection (face shield or goggles). Certified Nursing Assistant #1 was observed inside the room and was not wearing appropriate Personal Protective Equipment as indicated on the precaution signage. The finding is: The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/4/2023 and completed on 6/9/2023, the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment was implemented for each resident. This was identified for one (Resident #64) of two residents reviewed for Limited Range of Motion. Specifically, Resident #64 was observed on three separate occasions to not have bilateral hand rolls applied as ordered by a Physician. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Physician Orders dated 10/2015 documented that when a Medical Doctor (MD) / Nurse Practitioner (NP) order is obtained, the Nurse is responsible to pick up the order. The order should be designated to the Medication Administration Record (MAR) or Treatment Administration Record (TAR) based on the type of order and the appropriate schedule is initiated to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint # NY 00310491) initiated on 6/4/2023 and completed on 6/9/2023, the facility did not ensure that a Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) was prepared by an interdisciplinary team that includes but is not limited to the participation of the resident and the resident's representative and is reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments. This was identified for one (Resident #64) of two residents reviewed for Limited Range of Motion and one of 39 residents reviewed for care planning. Specifically, 1) Resident # 64's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) was not reviewed and revised to reflect the resident's current condition following a hospitalization. The resident's CCP did not reflect the use of bilateral hand rolls as ordered by a Physician. 2) Resident # 77's representative was not invited to attend the initial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES — 42 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $9.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY