No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Kennebunk Center For Health & Rehabilitation, LLC

158 Ross RD, Kennebunk, ME 04043 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 78 certified beds · (207) 985-7141 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (207) 985-7141 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 36 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
26 Barnard Ln · (207) 502-7074 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
48 Portland Rd · (207) 467-8299 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3 Alfred Rd · (207) 985-7787 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased22.6%24.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.0%5.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%2.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms28.0%11.6%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.7%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.9%25.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.4%17.4%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.9%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.0%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control32.7%29.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.2%20.2%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.3%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine79.3%74.5%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.1%20.8%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit17.3%16.1%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.261.451.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.902.011.80typical

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 180 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
47.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 47.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.8%CMS range 43.9–58.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 7.0–13.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge47.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge41.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting92.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.8%CMS range 5.5–13.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.88
RN hours/ resident / day
0.71
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.45
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.04
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.44
RN hoursweekends
54.7%
Total nursing turnover
60.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 75.7 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.88 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.448 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.16 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.06 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-16)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment for the medication storage room and the laundry room for 2 of 4 days of survey. Findings: 1.On 4/13/26 from 11:15 a.m. to 11:30 a.m., a tour of the laundry room too place with the Director of Operations and Director of housekeeping where the following was observed and confirmed: - Chipped wood on the door of the folding table, making it an uncleanable surface. -2 broken floor tiles by the door that goes from the clean side to the dirty side along with a rusted door frame and missing sheet rock. -Chipped paint on the windowsill of the dirty side making it an uncleanable surface. -Dirt and debris noted behind all 3 washers, along with broken floor tiles exposing untreated cement. -Wall by the sink on the dirty laundry side stained with an unknown substance, wall is noted to be lifting up, and the rubber floor trim is lifting up. 2.On 4/13/26 at 1:45 p.m. while observing the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a care plan was developed in the area of dementia care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dementia (Resident #55), and in the area of accidents for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #9).Findings: 1.Review of Resident #55's medical record stated he/she was admitted to the facility in July of 2025 with a diagnosis of dementia. The most recent care plan dated 2/9/26 lacked evidence that a comprehensive care plan was developed in the area of dementia care. On 4/15/26 at 1:29 p.m. in an interview with a surveyor, the Regional Director of Clinical Operations confirmed this finding. 2. On 10/22/25 the Division of Licensing and Certification (DLC) received a facility-reported incident that indicated that Resident #9 had sustained an unwitnessed fall on 10/21/25 and was subsequently transferred to an acute care hospital and diagnosed with multiple fractures. The facility's 5-day follow-up report, submitted to the DLC on 10/28/25 stated, .A toileting schedule has been added to care plan to attempt to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan by an interdisciplinary team (IDT) meeting, which included the participation of the resident and resident's representative, after each Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, for 7 of 21 residents whose care plans were reviewed (Resident #2, #7, #8, #23, #35, #40, & #79). Findings: 1. On 4/15/26 a review of Resident #2's medical record contained a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) version 3.0 dated 1/16/26 and 10/16/25. The clinical record lacked evidence of his/her IDT meeting being held within 7 days of the Quarterly MDS assessment. 2. On 4/15/26 a review of Resident #35's medical record contained a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) version 3.0 dated 3/4/26, 1/13/26, 10/2/25, and 7/3/25. The clinical record lacked evidence of his/her IDT meeting being held within 7 days of the Quarterly MDS assessment. 3. On 4/15/26 a review of Resident #79's medical record contained an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) version 3.0 dated 2/25/26. The clinical record lacked evidence of his/her IDT meeting being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy reviews, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to adequately follow physician orders for blood sugar checks before meals for 2 of 3 residents reviewed and failed to adequately follow the facility's policy for administering long-acting insulin for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #15, #43 & #69). Findings:The facility's Medication Pass Policy, last revised 9/24 states, it is the policy of the facility that medications are administered safely and timely per the physician's orders, and for facilities that support a 'liberalized' med pass, the following times may also be added: - Liberalized Med Pass Morning 7 AM - 11 AM - Liberalized Med Pass Lunch/Midday 11 AM - 2 PM - Liberalized Med Pass Evening 3 PM - 7 PM - Liberalized Med Pass Bedtime/HS 7 PM - 10 PM - Liberalized Med Pass Sunrise 4 AM - 6 AMThe facility's Diabetes Management Protocol, last revised 2/25 states, Insulin: Basal Insulin (Long acting): Glargine (Lantus), Detemir (Levemir), or Degludec (Tresiba) provides 24-hour glucose control.1. On 4/14/26 at 9:11 a.m. a surveyor observed several…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and Payroll Based Journal Report (PBJ), the facility failed to ensure it was sufficiently staffed on weekends for 1 of 1 quarters reviewed (10/1/25 through 12/31/25).Findings: Review of Center for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS) PBJ Report revealed the facility triggered for low weekend staffing during the first quarter (10/1/24 through 12/31/24). On 4/15/25 at 12:00 p.m., during a review of first quarter weekend staffing with a surveyor, the Administrator confirmed the facility was not adequately staffed for 5 of 39 days reviewed (day shifts).

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure expired lab supplies were removed from supply, available for use for 4 of 4 units, and the facility failed to ensure treatment carts were locked when unattended for1 of 1 carts, for 1 of 4 days of survey.Findings: 1.On [DATE] at 7:50 a.m. two surveyors identified lab supplies (blood collection tubes) that had expired: * 95 blue top blood collection tubes with expiration date [DATE] * 3 yellow top blood collection tubes with expiration date [DATE] * 29 red blood collection tubes with expiration of [DATE] On [DATE] at 7:59 a.m. the Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed the expired blood collection tubes with two surveyors and removed them from use. On [DATE] at 10:23 a.m. in an interview the Regional Director of Operations confirmed that the facility does sometimes do their own blood draws. 2. On [DATE] at 9:37 a.m. 2 surveyors observed an unlocked and unattended treatment cart located on the Windmere Unit. The third and fourth drawers on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner related to floors, walls, food preparation surfaces, the walk-in freezer, and the dish room for 1 of 1 initial kitchen tour. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure foods were sealed, labeled, and dated in a food preparation area, a dry storage room, a reach-in refrigerator, a walk-in refrigerator, and a walk-in freezer for 2 of 2 kitchen tours. Furthermore, the facility failed to maintain an emergency food supply for 2 of 4 days of survey (4/12/26, 4/13/26).Findings:Review of facility policy, Storage of Food & Supplies, revised 2/2022 states, .Labeling and rotating food supply .Food products that are opened and not completely used; transferred from its original package to another storage container; or prepared at the facility and stored should be labeled as to its contents and used by dates .Food removed from its original container must be labeled with the common…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-16 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to conduct regular inspection of all bed frames and mattresses as part of a regular maintenance program to ensure that the mattresses and bed frames are compatible and identify areas of possible entrapment for 4 of 4 units observed (Eagle, [NAME], Sagamore, and Windmere).Finding:Facility Policy Patient Bed Side Rails, revised 5/2/25 states, .The following areas of entrapment will be checked when the bed is in the flat position .Zone #7 between the head and foot board and the mattress end will not exceed more than 4 3/4 inches . Zones 5, 6 and 7 will be measured in accordance with the measurements for zones 1-4 until such time as new recommendations are made by the FDA [Food and Drug Administration] .All the beds in the facility will be checked annually using the Bed Assessment Tool to Prevent Entrapment, and when there is a change in side rail status. On 04/12/26 at 10:59 a.m., a surveyor observed Resident #7 asleep in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide care to residents in a manner that maintains each resident's dignity by failing to serve all residents seated at the same table at the same time for 1 of 2 dining observations on 1 of 4 days of survey (4/12/26).Finding:On 4/12/26 between 12:07 p.m. and 12:18 p.m., a surveyor observed the lunch meal service in the facility's dining room. Upon surveyor entrance to the dining room at 12:07 p.m., Residents #7 and #48 were seated at a table with Resident #29. Resident #29 had received his/her meal, and Residents #7 and #48 had not yet received their meals. Staff proceeded to deliver meals to residents at other tables in the dining room. At 12:10 p.m., Resident #7 asked Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 where their meals were and told the CNA that Resident #29 was waiting to begin eating until he/she and Resident #48 received their meal. CNA #1 replied that she was waiting for the rest of the meal trays to be delivered to the dining room, and then continued delivering meals to residents at the other tables. At 12:16…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a significant change and/or incident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. (Resident #91)Findings:Facility policy titled Change of Condition Notification states The facility will inform the resident, consult with the resident's healthcare provider, and if known, notify the resident's legal representative or family member when there is. A significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status. A decision to transfer the resident from the facility. Under the section titled Procedure it states Physician/family notification must be documented in the electronic health record.A review of Resident #91's clinical record shows a progress note dated 2/16/25 at 1:59 p.m., which stated Patient lethargic this afternoon. Patients unable to answer simple questions. Vitals signs reflect an infectious process. BP (blood pressure) 159/88, p (pulse) 108, temp 99.1, oxygen saturation 88% on RA (room air) . Is appearing to be off [his/her] baseline.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to issue a written transfer/discharge notice and a bed hold notice to include cost of care and a statement of the resident's appeal rights to the legal representative for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for transfer to an acute care hospital (Resident #77).Finding:1. Documentation in Resident #77's clinical record indicated that he/she was transferred to an acute care hospital on 1/15/26 and on 4/12/26. Further review of Resident #77's clinical record lacked evidence that the facility issued a written transfer and discharge notice and bed hold notice to the resident's representative for the above dates.On 4/15/26 at 2:19 p.m. during an interview in the presence of 4 surveyors, the Business Office Manager confirmed that she does not issue a written transfer/discharge notice and bed hold notice to resident representatives.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 1 of 1 resident receiving oxygen therapy (Resident #11).Finding:On 4/12/26 at 9:09 a.m. and 11:48 a.m., a surveyor observed Resident #11 asleep in bed, wearing oxygen (O2) via a nasal cannula with the oxygen concentrator flow rate set between 3.5 and 4 liters per minute.A review of Resident #11's clinical record revealed an active physician order for Oxygen at 2 liters per minute continuous via nasal cannula.every shift for shortness of breath.On 4/13/26 at 3:59 p.m., during an interview, Resident #11 stated that staff hand him/her the oxygen tubing and that he/she puts it on and takes it off, but that staff make all adjustments to the oxygen concentrator settings.On 4/14/26 at 8:45 a.m., the surveyor observed Resident #1 asleep in bed wearing oxygen with the oxygen concentrator flow rate set to 2.5 liters per minute.On 4/15/26 at 11:45 a.m., during a repeat observation, Resident #11 was lying in bed and was not wearing oxygen, and his/her oxygen concentrator was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-25 · tag F0554 — pattern
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy, the facilities interdisciplinary team failed to determine if it was clinically appropriate for a resident to keep a medication at bedside and self-administer medications for 4 of 5 residents reviewed. (Resident ##2, #3, #4 and #5). Findings: 1. On 2/25/25 from approx. 8:15 through 9:02 a.m., the following was observed: Resident #2 had a medicine cup with an unknown cream on the bedside tray table. Resident #3 had a medicine cup with an unknown cream on the beside dresser. Resident #4 had pump bottle of Bio freeze and a tube of Triad Hydrophilic wound dressing paste on the bedside dresser. Resident #5 had a medicine cup with an unknown opaque color cream with a plastic cup over it on the bedside tray table. 2. Review of Resident #2's medical record lacked evidence of a provider order for any cream treatment other than house stock lotions, an order for self-administration, a self-administration evaluation and a care plan for self-administration. 3. Review of Resident #3's medical record contained a provider order,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure medications including treatments were stored properly on 2 of 4 units observed (Sagamore and [NAME] units). for 1 of 1 day of survey. (2/25/25) Findings: 1. On 2/25/25 at 9:02 a.m., Resident #5 was sitting on the side of the bed with the bedside tray table in front of him/her. On the table was a medicine cup filled with an unknown opaque color cream with a plastic cup over it and 2 medicine cups of applesauce with a spoon. At this time, in a brief interview, Resident #5 stated that the nurse was giving him/her medications, but they were too big to swallow, so she is cutting them in half. The surveyor asked what the unknown cream was for. Resident #5 stated, for arthritis pain. Surveyor asked if the nurse applies the cream, he/she stated, I do. At 9:05 a.m., the nurse entered the room with a cup of pills, upon leaving the room, the arthritis cream was left on the table. 2. On 2/25/25 at 10:05 a.m., the surveyor rounded with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and a review of Safety Data Sheets (SDS), the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards relating to the storage of a chemical not being properly secured for 1 of 1 days of survey (2/25/25). Findings: The Safety Data Sheet for HDX Disinfectant Spray Linen Scent 19 oz noted the following: Description of first aid measures: Inhalation Remove to fresh air. Eye contact Rinse thoroughly with plenty of water for at least 15 minutes, lifting lower and upper eyelids. Consult a physician. Skin contact Wash skin with soap and water. Ingestion Rinse mouth. On 2/25/25 at 8:31 a.m., the surveyor observed Resident #1 to have a can of Great Value Disinfectant Spray Linen Scent on his/her bedside dresser. In a brief interview, Resident #1 stated he/she uses it for when it smells, and it's his/her personal can. On 2/25/25 at 10:05 a.m., the surveyor and the Director of Nursing (DON) observed Resident #1's can of Great Value Disinfectant Spray Linen Scent on the bedside dresser. At this time, the DON stated she was unaware…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medications (Resident #5). Finding: On 2/25/25 at approx. 9:02 a.m., Resident #5 was sitting on the side of the bed with the bedside tray table in front of him/her. On the table was a medicine cup with an unknown opaque color cream with a plastic cup over it and 2 medicine cups of applesauce with a spoon. At this time, in a brief interview, Resident #5 stated that the nurse was giving him/her medications, but they were too big to swallow, so she is cutting them in half. The surveyor asked what the unknown cream was for. Resident #5 stated, for arthritis pain. Surveyor asked if the nurse applies the cream, he/she stated, I do. At 9:05 a.m., the nurse entered the room with a cup of pills, upon leaving the room, the arthritis cream was left on the table. On 2/25/25 from 10:05 a.m., through 10:17 a.m., during a walk through with the Director of Nursing (DON), both the surveyor and DON observed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment on 4 of 4 units (Windermere, Eagle, Sagamore and Regena, and Laundry Room) for 1 of 4 days of survey. Findings: Sagamore unit: On 1/14/25 at 8:09 a.m., observation of the shared bathroom for room [ROOM NUMBER] and 4 with a black substance around the base of the toilet and the caulking strip peeled up. On 1/13/25 at 11:32 a.m., and on 1/14/25 at 8:11 a.m., observations of the shared bathroom for room [ROOM NUMBER] and 9 with a commode bucket stored on the floor, a large brown circular stain on the floor to the left of the toilet, a brownish tan substance around the base of the toilet and the caulking strip peeled up. On 1/13/25 at 10:29 a.m., observation of the shared bathroom for room [ROOM NUMBER] and 10 with a gray basin stored on floor and leaning against the wall. On 1/16/25 at 3:16 p.m., the above was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for 6 of 6 resident reviewed for ADL's (Resident #126, #6, #19, #64, #226 and #230). In addition, the facility failed to follow the care plan in the area of oral hygiene for 1 of 1 reviewed. (Resident #6). Findings: The facilities ADL Policy and Procedure issued 6/23 states, Purpose: To provide the level of care required by each individual resident and Procedure: Staff provide assistance to complete ADL activities per their person centered evaluation and care plan. These activities are broken down into eight areas. #1.Bathing/showering . #8 Personal hygiene and grooming. 1. On 4/10/24 the Division of Licensing and Certification received a complaint that Resident #126 did not receive appropriate care with his/her Activities of Daily Living (ADL). He/she was found wearing the hospital [NAME] a day after admission and for the 2 weeks Resident #126 was at the facility, his/her underwear were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection related to respiratory care for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident # 16 and #20). In addition, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 3 reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #16). Findings: The facilities Nebulizer Treatments Policy and Procedure revised 2/23, states, post treatment, disconnect the reservoir from the compressor and clean per manufacturer's Instructions, Place reservoir in a plastic bag Manufactures Instruction Manual for Power Neb Ultra Compressor Nebulizer, under section cleaning and maintenance states, clean after every use .disassemble mouthpiece or mask from cap .wash all items, except tubing in a hot water/dishwashing detergent solution. Rince under hot tap water for 30 seconds to remove detergent residue. Allow to air dry. Under section , Filter Change states, Filter should be changed every 6 months or sooner if filter discolors. 1. On 1/13/25 at 11:32…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient direct care staff were scheduled and on duty to meet the needs of residents that reside in the facility. This has the potential to affect all residents needing assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). Findings: Review of Payroll Based Journal staffing report revealed the facility triggered for excessively low weekend staffing during the fourth quarter of 2024 (July 1 - September 30). On 1/15/25 at 3:47 p.m., a surveyor met with the Administrator and reviewed weekend staffing for July 1, 2024, through September 30, 2024, the Administrator confirmed the facility did not have enough staff to meet resident needs on the weekends.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review and the facility's own Personal Appearance and Dress guidelines and the Personal Hygiene for Food Handlers policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, failed to serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, failed to monitor food temperatures to prevent food borne illness prior to serving residents for 1 of 2 days of survey (1/13/25), and failed to ensure that plumbing fixtures were properly installed to prevent backflow as required by the Maine State Plumbing Code. This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings: The facilities Personal Hygiene for Food Handlers, revised on 2/22 states, Hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, and beard restraints are worn at all times when in the kitchen and Facial hair should be neatly trimmed and covered by mask or beard guard. The 10-114 State of Maine Rules Chapter 226, definition Section A, defines an Air-Gap Separation - A physical separation between the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the terms and conditions of a binding arbitration agreement were clearly communicated to the residents or their representatives and not required as a condition of admission due to the agreement being a part of the admission paperwork for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for Arbitration (Resident #126, #230, #23, #64, and #19). Findings: 1. On 1/13/25 at 9:15 a.m., a surveyor conducted an entrance conference with the Administrator and the Director of Nursing and was told, when asked, that no residents in the facility had signed an arbitration agreement. During a record review for Resident #19, a surveyor located a signed Arbitration agreement in Resident #19's Electronic medical Record (EMR). 2. On 1/16/25 at 9:32 a.m., during an interview, the Admissions and Marketing Director stated she is responsible for having the resident/family representative sign the admission packet which also contains the Resident and Facility Arbitration Agreement upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's choice in the area of clothing were followed for 1 of 9 sampled residents (Resident #234). Findings: On 4/18/24 the Department of Licensing and Certification (DLC) received a referral from Adult Protective Services (APS) of an incident that occurred on 4/12/24 around 11:00 p.m. where a tooth became cracked during the removal of a sweater. A surveyor reviewed the facility incident report dated and learned that on the night of 4/12/24, two staff members were getting Resident #234 ready for bed and tried to remove his/her sweater. Resident #234 reportedly told the staff she/he did not want to remove the sweater and bit down on the neck of the sweater to prevent removal. The sweater was removed anyway and Resident #234's tooth broke during the removal. On 1/15/25 at 2:10 p.m. a surveyor spoke with the Director of Nursing about the incident and confirmed that the residents' right to keep the sweater on was not respected despite the resident clearly expressing he/she did not want the sweater removed.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, record review and interviews, the facility failed to adequately evaluate a resident after an unwitnessed fall and complete neurological assessments as per facility policy for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #125). Findings: The facilities Fall Prevention Program, last revised 3/23 states, If a fall occurs . Monitor resident's status for 72 hours. Some injuries may not be apparent immediately after the fall. The facilities Neurological Evaluation Policy, revised 4/23 states, The licensed nurse performs neurological evaluations whenever there is a possibility of a head injury, change in mentation, or an unwitnessed fall Purpose: Accurate evaluation and monitoring of changes in residence neurological status to allow prompt medical notification treatment Procedure: The neuro care flow sheet includes vital signs temperature, pulse, respirations, and blood pressure and information regarding pupil reaction of both eyes, level of consciousness, motor function, speech, facial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain adequate pharmaceutical services to ensure that outdated medications, were removed from the medication carts making them no longer available for use in 1 of 3 medication carts. Findings: On [DATE] at 9:06 a.m., a surveyor observed in medication cart on Eagle Wing a medication card for Ondansetron HCL 4 milligrams (mg) for Resident #13 had expired on [DATE]. The surveyor confirmed the finding with the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1. at 9:12 a.m. On [DATE] at 9:30 a.m., a surveyor discussed the above findings with the Director of Nursing.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that two people, who are authorized to administer medications, signed the Narcotic Bound Book Shift Count page indicating that they counted all the controlled substances at the change of shift for multiple shifts between 8/14/24 and 9/3/24 (total of 56 shifts) for 1 of 4 units reviewed for drug diversion (Sagamore). Findings: Review of the facility policy Controlled Substances dated 10/07 states: At each shift change, a physical inventory of controlled medications, as defined by state regulation, is conducted by two licensed clinicians and is documented on an audit record. On 8/16/24, the Department of Licensing and Certification received a facility reported incident indicating during shift change on 8/16/24 at 16:00, a 30ml bottle of Ativan could not be located. Review of provided Sagamore Unit shift count log lacked documented evidence that a shift change count was conducted by two qualified staff on the following days 8/14/24 at 15:00 during oncoming shift. 8/15/25 at 23:00 during outgoing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a separately locked, permanently affixed compartments for storage of controlled drugs listed in Schedule II of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1976 and other drugs subject to abuse for 1 of 1 observation. Findings: On 8/16/24, the Department of Licensing and Certification received a facility reported incident indicating during shift change on 8/16/24 at 16:00, a 30ml bottle of Ativan could not be located. On 9/3/24 at 9:15 a.m. an observation of the locked refrigerator in the locked Medication Room, a surveyor observed that there was no separate, locked box that is attached to the refrigerator for storage of Controlled Substances. On 9/3/24 at 11:00a.m. in an interview with the Director of Nursing, she stated that there had never been a seperate locked box in that refrigerator. On 9/3/24 at 11:05a.m. the above were confirmed with the Director of Nursing.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in good repair and in a sanitary condition, on 2 of 4 units (Sagamore and [NAME]) for 1 of 1 environmental tour. Findings: 1. [NAME] wing - room [ROOM NUMBER] - resident by the door, arm of wheel chair is cracked with open areas creating an uncleanable surface. 2. Sagamore wing - room [ROOM NUMBER], the wall to the left of the door upon entry has deep gouges in wall door frame. 3. Sagamore wing - room [ROOM NUMBER] - wall between dresser and bathroom has gouges in the lower portion of the wall. 4. Sagamore wing - room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom - Ceiling vent full of dust and cobwebs. On 10/19/23, at 2:20 p.m the above finding was confirmed with the Administrator.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan to reflect the current needs for 3 of 27 residents reviewed in the areas of transmission-based precautions and respiratory care (#51, #173, #176); and failed to revise the care plan after each assessment for 1 out of 3 sampled residents (#39) receiving in-house therapy services. Findings: 1. On 10/16/23 at 11:16 a.m., a surveyor observed a personal protective equipment (PPE) station with signage advising of the need for transmission-based precautions (TBP) outside of Resident #51's room. A review of Resident #51's clinical record revealed a history and physical, dated 6/25/23, which noted the diagnosis of Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) in the resident's urine. A review of Resident #51's care plan noted the last revision was completed on 9/2/23 and did not include the need to use TBP when providing care for the resident. On 10/18/23 at 12:15 p.m., in an interview with a surveyor, the Director of Nursing confirmed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0660 — pattern
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a safe discharge plan that focused on a resident's discharge goals, preparation, and effective transition of care for 5 out of 6 sampled residents discharged from the facility. (#25, #168, #268, #269 and #271) Findings: 1. On 10/16/23 at 9:30 a.m. a surveyor reviewed closed records for Resident #171 in response to a complaint received at the Department of Licensing and Certification on 8/3/22. Review found Resident #271 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged to home on 7/30/22. Discharge orders included orders for home health services. The medical record lacked evidence that home health services was located. Resident #271 was readmitted to acute care on 8/1/22 with sepsis. 2. On 10/16/23 at 9:50 a.m., a surveyor reviewed closed records for Resident #269 in response to a complaint received at the Department of Licensing Certification on 10/18/22. Review found Resident #269 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to follow doctor's orders and their own Weight Policy & Procedure to document weights for 4 out of 4 residents (#6, #13, #26 and #53) with daily or weekly weight orders. Findings: 1. On 10/19/23 at 11:00 a.m a surveyor reviewed Resident #6 physician orders located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and found an order dated 4/15/23 to obtain Daily Weights for a diagnosis of Congestive Heart Failure (CHF). Daily weights were not recorded for sampled months of 9/23 and 10/23. No documentation found with an explanation for the missing weights. 2. On 10/19/23 at 11:30 am a surveyor reviewed Resident #13 physician orders located in the EMR and found an order dated 4/19/23 one-time weekly weight, do every Monday for CHF. Weights were not recorded weekly for the months of 5/23, 6/23, 7/23 and 8/23. No documentation found with an explanation for the missing weights. 3. On 10/19/23 at 11:40 a.m., a surveyor reviewed Resident #53 orders located in the EMR and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide respiratory services as directed by physician orders related to oxygen use and monitoring for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy (#51, #173). Findings: 1. On 10/16/23 at 11:16 a.m., a surveyor observed an oxygen concentrator set at 3 liters/minute in use next to Resident #51's bed. A review of the clinical record revealed a physician's order, dated 9/22/23, which stated Oxygen 2-5 liters per minute via nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath. Indicate O2 (oxygen) saturation. A review of Resident #51's medication and treatment administration records found no documentation of when oxygen was in use or what the saturation levels were. 2. On 10/16/23 at 3:04 p.m., a surveyor observed an oxygen concentrator set at 1 liter/minute and in use next to Resident #173's bed. A review of the clinical record revealed a physician's order, dated 10/4/23, which stated Oxygen via nasal cannula, titrate to keep O2 saturation greater than 90% every shift. A review of Resident #173's medication and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide food that accommodated resident preferences for 2 out of 3 residents (#3 and #13) sampled about the food choices available. Findings: On 10/17/23 at 11:30 a.m., in an interview with Resident #13, stated he/she has repeatedly asked for ice cream as a snack and hamburgers as a meal alternative and has not received them. Resident #13 stated their goal is to gain weight because they have lost a lot of weight and that is why they are at the facility. Resident #13 would like more sugar snacks like ice cream and cookies, but they never get them. Dessert is frequently fruit cocktail. On 10/17/23 at 12:00 p.m., a surveyor observed Resident #13 ask the [NAME] Unit Helper for some ice cream. This surveyor walked with the [NAME] Unit Helper to get some ice cream and met the Head Chef in the hallway. The [NAME] Unit Helper asked for ice cream for Resident #13 and was told ice cream is no longer stocked and they would have to go buy some at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on closed record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (Form CMS -10055) (SNFABN) were provided to 1 out of 2 residents reviewed whose Medicare Part A services were discontinued. (Resident #267) Finding: On 10/19/23 at 10:45 a.m. a surveyor reviewed Resident #267's medical record. Resident #267 received Medicare Part A services that ended on 6/16/23. The Medical record lacked evidence that the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN) was provided to the resident so that he/she could make an informed decision to continue receiving the skilled services that may not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility. On 10/19/23 at 11:15 a.m. a surveyor met with the Business Office Manager and confirmed this notice was not issued prior to the end of Medicare Part A services.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to permit a resident's return to facility for 1 out of 1 resident reviewed for facility-initiated discharge to the hospital (Resident #270). Findings: On 5/16/23 at 9:16 a.m., Division of Licensing and Certification received a complaint indicating on 5/15/23 the facility transferred a resident to the hospital and failed to accept return of the resident. On 10/17/23 at 9:30 a.m., a closed record review of Resident #270's showed Resident #270 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a complicated medical history. The hospital discharge summary included follow up appointments scheduled for 5/2/23 and 5/3/23 involving out of state providers. Resident #270 was transferred on 4/15/23 to the facility by ambulance due to their inability to tolerate sitting upright for the duration of the ride. On 10/17/23 at 11:00 a.m., in an interview with the admission Coordinator, stated that transportation was a known problem prior to admitting Resident #270. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-01-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide evidence to show Advance Directives were offered or reviewed with the resident and/or resident representatives or that the resident and/or resident representatives were provided with written information concerning the right to formulate an Advance Directive, for 11 of 14 residents reviewed for Advance Directive. (Resident #8, #3, #35, #17, #18, #19, #37, #64, #226 and #230) Findings: 1. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the electronic medical record and the paper medical record lacked evidence that the facility offered or reviewed with the resident and/or resident representatives or that the resident and/or resident representatives were provided with written information concerning the right to formulate an advanced directive. On 1/14/25 at 7:19 a.m., during an interview with the Administrator, the above was confirmed. 2. Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the electronic medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES — 42 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 2 of 54.1-2.1 vs chain
The other 41 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Brentwood Center For Health & Rehabilitation, LLCYarmouth, ME 1 of 5The Pines At Utica Center For Nursing And RehabUtica, NY 2 of 5Beacon Brook Center For Health & RehabilitationNaugatuck, CT 2 of 5Bloomfield Center For Nursing & RehabilitationBloomfield, CT 2 of 5Eastside Center For Health & Rehabilitation, LLCBangor, ME 2 of 5Ludlowe Center For Health & RehabilitationFairfield, CT 2 of 5Mansfield Center For Nursing And RehabilitationStorrs Mansfield, CT 2 of 5Montowese Center For Health & RehabilitationNorth Haven, CT 2 of 5Riverside Health & Rehabilitation CenterEast Hartford, CT 2 of 5Shady Knoll Center For Health & RehabilitationSeymour, CT 2 of 5Summit At Plantsville Center For Health & RehabiliPlantsville, CT 2 of 5The Pines At Catskill Center For Nursing & RehabCatskill, NY 2 of 5The Pines At Glens Falls Ctr For Nursing & RehabGlens Falls, NY 3 of 5Augusta Center For Health & Rehabilitation, LLCAugusta, ME 3 of 5Cambridge Health And Rehabilitation CenterFairfield, CT 3 of 5Evergreen Center For Health & RehabilitationStafford Springs, CT 3 of 5Glastonbury Center For Health & RehabilitationGlastonbury, CT 3 of 5Hebrew Center For Health And RehabilitationWest Hartford, CT 3 of 5Laurel Ridge Center For Health & RehabilitationRidgefield, CT 3 of 5Maefair Center For Health & RehabilitationTrumbull, CT 3 of 5Marlborough Health & Rehabilitation CenterMarlborough, CT 3 of 5Reservoir Center For Health & Rehabilitation, TheMarlborough, MA 3 of 5Water's Edge Center For Health & RehabilitationMiddletown, CT 3 of 5Winship Green Center for Health & Rehab, LLCBath, ME 4 of 5Bethel Health Care CenterBethel, CT 4 of 5Brewer Center For Health & Rehabilitation, LLCBrewer, ME 4 of 5Dover Center For Health & RehabilitationDover, NH 4 of 5Huntington Hills Center for Health and RehabilitatMelville, NY 4 of 5Pines At Bristol For Nursing & Rehabilitation, TheBristol, CT 4 of 5Sharon Center For Health & RehabilitationSharon, CT 4 of 5Stone Bridge Center For Health & RehabilitationNewtown, CT 4 of 5The Pines At Poughkeepsie Ctr For Nursing & RehabPoughkeepsie, NY 4 of 5The Pines at Rutland Center for Nursing & RehabiliRutland, VT 4 of 5Village Crest Center For Health & RehabilitationNew Milford, CT 5 of 5Belair Care Center IncBellmore, NY 5 of 5Maple View Health & Rehabilitation CenterRocky Hill, CT 5 of 5Milford Health And Rehabilitation CenterMilford, CT 5 of 5Norway Center For Health & Rehabilitation, LLCNorway, ME 5 of 5Pine Heights at Brattleboro Center for Nursing & RBrattleboro, VT 5 of 5Regency House Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterWallingford, CT

Showing 40 of 41; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
STEWART, EDWARDIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/26/2022
BOKOW, BARRYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/04/2013
OSTREICHER, MARVINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/28/2013

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.7M
Related-party expense22% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 62%Medicare 12%Other / private 27%

This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$465per resident / day
operating cost
$14,137per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$422per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ME

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maine Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maine
$13,976/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,904/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,205/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 205095. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next