Brighton Post Acute Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 191 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 33% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 73.1 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.97 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.20 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · H2023-11-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to 1.follow the care plan intervention to prevent a fall with a fracture and laceration for one Resident #1.2. implement and develop appropriate interventions to prevent a fall with a fracture for one Resident (#35), 3. complete a fall investigation report after a fall for one Resident (#7), and 4. keep one Resident (#67) free from accidents/hazards after ingestion of lotion with subsequent hospitalization, . 5(a). For Resident #5, the facility failed to implement a scoop mattress intervention in a timely manner (b). have a bed alarm in good working condition out of a total sample of 30 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Falls Program Policy, dated 09/2023, indicated the following: - Fall assessment should be completed upon admission, re-admission, quarterly, significant change in resident status and as needed. Identify residents fall risk after completing and reviewing the fall assessment. - Develop…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-14 · tag F0712 — pattern
  Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician visits were completed as required for three Residents (#32, #4 and #15) out of a total of 22 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #32 was admitted to the facility in December 2024 with diagnoses including heart failure, asthma and respiratory failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #32 was cognitively intact evidenced by a score of 13 out of a possible 15 on the Brief interview for Mental Status Exam (BIMS). Review of Resident #32's clinical record indicated he/she had been seen by the Physician on 12/28/24 and 9/2/25 and by the Nurse Practitioner (NP) on 1/3/25, 1/4/25, 1/7/25, 3/28/25, 4/15/25, 5/20/25, 6/8/25, 7/9/25, 7/27/25, 8/1/25 and 8/8/25. Resident #32 was not seen in February 2025 as required and the Physician did not alternate visits with the NP, as required. During an interview on 9/26/25 at 11:03 A.M., the Medical Director (Resident #32's attending physician)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and readily accessible for facility staff for four Residents (#8, #44, #32 and #42) out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically:1. For Resident #44 and #8, the facility failed to ensure the Physician and other licensed professionals' progress notes were documented in the Electronic Health Record (EHR).2. For Resident #42, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff accurately documented the administration of lidocaine pain patches.3. For Resident #32, the facility failed to accurately document the cleaning of an oxygen concentrator filter. Findings include: 1. Resident #44 was admitted to the facility in March 2022 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, acute kidney failure, dependence on renal dialysis, shortness of breath atherosclerotic heart disease, essential primary hypertension, chronic atrial fibrillation,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a call light was able to be utilized for one Resident (#15), out of a total of 22 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Call Bell Procedure, dated as reviewed September 2024, indicated: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to respond to the resident's requests and needs. 5. When the resident is in bed or confined to a chair be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with diagnoses including stroke and cognitive communication disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #15 is cognitively intact as evidenced by a score of 15 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam and is dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. During an interview on 9/24/25 at 8:29 A.M., Resident #15 asked the surveyor to pick up his/her television remote control…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure attending care plan meetings was offered to one Resident (#44) out of a total of 22 sampled Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the Resident was notified of the care plan meetings or was offered to attend. Findings include: Resident #44 was admitted to the facility in March 2022 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and major depressive disorder. A diagnosis of dependence on supplemental oxygen was added to his/her record on 9/12/24. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #44 is severely cognitively impaired as evidenced by a score of seven out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam. During multiple interviews throughout the survey, Resident #44 was able to engage in discussions about his/her healthcare related to his/her use of oxygen, attendance at dialysis and pain levels. Review of Resident #44's clinical record indicated his/her health care proxy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and records reviewed, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for two Residents (#44, and #35) out of a total of 22 sampled residents. Specifically:1. For Resident #44, the facility failed to implement physician orders for fluid restrictions.2. For Resident # 35, the facility failed to implement physician's orders for fluid restrictions.Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Encouraging and Restricting Fluids dated September 2024, indicated: - The purpose of this procedure is to provide the resident with the amount of fluids necessary to maintain optimum health. This may include encouraging or restricting fluids. - Verify there is a physician's order for this procedure. - Review the residents care plan and or your daily assignment sheet to assess for any special needs of the resident. - Follow specific instructions concerning fluid intake or restrictions. - Record the amount of fluids consumed on the intake side of the intake and output record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide supervision with meals for one Resident (#44) out of a total sample of 22 residents. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Supporting, dated as revised September 2024, indicated: - Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services to ensure that their activities of daily living (ADLs) do not diminish unless the circumstances of their clinical condition(s) demonstrate that diminishing ADLs are unavoidable. ADLs are provided in according with resident preference and needs. - Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: Dining (meals and snacks). - Interventions to improve or minimize a resident's functional abilities will be in accordance with the resident's assessed needs, preferences,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, were provided for three Residents (#44, #1, and #32) out of sample of 22 residents. Specifically:For Resident #44, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for oxygen use prior to administration.For Resident #1, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for oxygen use prior to administration.For Resident #32, the facility failed to clean the oxygen concentrator filter, resulting in a thick build-up of dust. Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Resident Care and Treatment- Use of Oxygen dated as reviewed September 2024, indicated the following but not limited to- Nursing personnel administer oxygen as prescribed by policy and ensure compliance with all Life Safety Codes.- Adjust the oxygen delivery device so that it is comfortable for the Resident and the proper flow of oxygen is being administered. Resident #44 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed for one Resident (#42) of 22 sampled residents, to provide adequate pain relief. Specifically, did not remove the used patch and replace it with a new patch for two days, which resulted in the Resident experiencing mild pain, and the potential for the body to absorb excessive amounts of lidocaine. In addition, facility staff applied two patches when there was an order for only one patch, which also contributed to the potential for the body to absorb excessive amounts of lidocaine. Findings include:Review of the facility policy Pain Management Guidelines dated September 2024 indicated it did not reference the use of Lidocaine patches, specifically.Lidocaine is an externally applied topical anesthetic used for the temporary relief of minor pain.Review of the Federal Drug Administration guidance for the use of lidocaine 4% patches indicated:- - Do not use more than one patch on your body at a time or with other topical analgesics at the same…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored as required for one Resident (#22), out of a total sample of 22 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that medications were not left at the bedside for Resident #22 while unsupervised by staff.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Management-Medication Storage, dated and revised September 2024, indicated the following:-The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. -Drugs and biologicals shall be stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received.Review of the facility policy titled Self-Administration of Medications, dated and revised September 2024, indicated the following:-It is the responsibility of the interdisciplinary team (IDT) to determine that it is safe for the resident to self-administer medications.-The decision that a resident has the ability to self-medicate is subject…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-31 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for four Residents (#61, #41, #59, and #32) out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #61 the facility inaccurately coded no significant weight gain when there was one. 2. For Resident #41 and Resident #59, the facility inaccurately coded their ability to be understood. 3. For Resident #32, the facility inaccurately coded that the Resident was in a comatose state. Findings Include: 1. Resident #61 was admitted to the facility in November 2023 with diagnoses including stroke, heart disease, asthma and diabetes. Review of the medical record indicated the following weights: 2/27/2024 15:14 146.2 Lbs. (pounds) 3/5/2024 13:51 151.4 Lbs. 3/12/2024 12:11 147.0 Lbs. 3/19/2024 14:24 147.0 Lbs. 3/26/2024 16:26 149.0 Lbs. 4/2/2024 08:34 148.0 Lbs. 4/10/2024 13:10 146.3 Lbs. 4/17/2024 12:06 148.0 Lbs. 4/23/2024 15:06 148.7 Lbs. 4/30/2024 07:50 147.0 Lbs. 5/7/2024 14:18…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$200,070 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $200,070 — penalty dated 2023-11-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $514K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA