Belmont Bay Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center
14906 Richmond Highway, Woodbridge, VA 22191 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (703) 491-6167 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (25% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $12,834 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-06)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 33% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.3% | 14.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.2% | 5.4% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.6% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 84.9% | 18.7% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.2% | 3.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.6% | 15.6% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.9% | 20.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.4% | 94.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.3% | 4.7% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.2% | 21.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 2.1% | 14.2% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.2% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 59.4% | 73.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.6% | 22.3% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.2% | 11.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.74 | 1.52 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.90 | 1.48 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 137 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 76.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 84 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 43% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.8%CMS range 43.2–61.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.6%CMS range 8.2–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 76.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 66.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 64.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 42.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 94.6% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 94.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.4%CMS range 5.1–12.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.04 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.1 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
3. For Resident #45 (R45), the facility staff failed to assess the resident for safe independent smoking. Resident #45 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to cerebral infarction (1) and diabetes mellitus (2). The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, an annual assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 5/13/2024, the resident scored 13 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. A review of the MDS documented no tobacco use. The comprehensive care plan documented in part, The resident is a smoker. Resident educated on facilities nonsmoking policy. Date Initiated: 07/22/2022. Under Interventions it documented in part, .Instruct resident about the facility policy on smoking: locations, times, safety concerns. Date Initiated: 07/22/2022 . Review of the clinical record documented a smoking safety evaluation dated 1/13/2024 and 4/13/2024 which documented in part, .Does the resident currently smoke or vape? No. On 6/5/2024 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to perform a transfer with a mechanical lift per the manufacturer's recommendation for one of three residents in the survey sample, Resident #1 (R1). The findings include:For R1, facility staff failed to spread the legs (open the legs) of a mechanical lift while being lifted off the bed. R1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to cerebral palsy (1), paraplegia (2) and intellectual disabilities (3). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an annual assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 08/15/2025, R1 scored 3 (three) out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. Section GG. Functional Abilities coded R1 as being dependent for Chair/bed-to-chair transfer. On 10/29/2025 at approximately 8:05 a.m., an observation of R1's transfer using a (Name of Mechanical Lift) 500 from the bed to a wheelchair was conducted in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow the prescribed menu in one of one kitchen. The findings include: On 6/3/24 at 4:41 p.m., observation was made of tray line service for the dinner meal. After reviewing the menu, the observation revealed there was no garden pasta salad. Instead, the pasta salad consisted only of pasta, and included no vegetables. There was no seasonal soup available for residents. There was no lettuce or tomatoes available for resident sandwiches. Approximately two-thirds of the way through the meal service, the facility ran out of croissants, and served white bread; and ran out of tomato and onion salad, and served tossed salad. On 6/3/24 at 1:27 p.m., OSM (other staff member) #1, the regional food services director, and OSM #6, a regional dietary manager, were interviewed. OSM #1 stated the cook should print daily production sheets at least 24 hours in advance. That way, if any items from the menu are missing, the facility staff have the opportunity to get them. He stated the facility cook was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to serve palatable food in one of one kitchen. The findings include: On 6/3/24 at 5:15 p.m., a test tray was requested at the conclusion of dinner service. Two surveyors and OSM (other staff member) #1, the regional food services director, tested all the food served to residents. The pureed tomato and onion salad, and the pureed egg salad, had no flavor, and were sticky in texture. OSM #1 agreed these two items were not appetizing or palatable. On 6/3/24 at 1:27 p.m., OSM (other staff member) #1, the regional food services director, and OSM #6, a regional dietary manager, were interviewed. OSM #1 stated the cook should taste all of the food before serving it to any residents. On 6/4/23 at 4:47 p.m., ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the administrator, ASM #2, the director of nursing, and ASM #3, the regional vice president of operations, were informed of these concerns. A review of the facility policy, Food: Quality and Palatability, revealed, in part: The Dining Services Director and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to serve food at the consistency ordered by the physician for one of 50 residents in the survey sample, Resident #26. The findings include: For Resident #26 (R26), the facility staff served the resident a plate of pureed food, instead of food at a regular texture, as ordered by the physician. On 6/3/24 at 1:08 p.m., R26 was observed sitting up in his bed with the overbed table across the bed; the overbed table contained R26's meal tray. The meal tray contained spaghetti noodles and tomato sauce. R26 had spaghetti noodles in multiple places on his shirt. He was observed attempting to feed himself the spaghetti, but spilled it onto his shirt. He stated he did not really care for spaghetti, and asked if the surveyor could get him something else to eat. The facility staff was alerted of the resident's request. At 1:31 p.m., R26 was observed sitting up in his bed with a new meal tray. The meal tray contained three different types of pureed food. Neither the resident nor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to serve food according to a resident's preference for four of 50 residents in the survey sample, Residents #4, #22, #66, and #68 The findings include: For Residents #4, #22, #66, and #68, the facility failed to serve what the residents had chosen for the dinner meal on 6/3/24. On 6/3/24 at 4:41 p.m., observation was made of tray line service for the dinner meal. For Resident #4, the resident's meal ticket indicated the resident wanted tomato and onion salad, savory summer soup, egg salad on a croissant, and lettuce and tomato for the sandwich. The resident's dinner tray instead contained a tossed salad, chicken noodle soup, no lettuce and tomato, and egg salad on white bread. For Resident #22, the resident's meal ticket indicated the resident wanted tomato and onion salad, lettuce and tomato for his sandwich, and two servings of ice cream. The resident's dinner tray instead contained marinated green beans, no lettuce and tomato, and only one serving of ice cream.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to store and serve food in a sanitary manner in one of one facility kitchen. The findings include: On 6/3/24 at 11:15 a.m., initial observation was made in the kitchen. The walk in refrigerator contained one bottle of pancake syrup, one package of sliced turkey, one package of unsliced turkey, and one package of ham that were all open but undated. The smaller cook's refrigerator contained two bottles of ketchup, one container of relish, and one jar of applesauce that were all open but undated. On 6/3/24 at 4:41 p.m., observation was made of tray line service for the dinner meal. OSM #3, the cook, was wearing gloves. With gloves on, he touched contaminated surfaces including serving utensil handles, the steam table surface, the cutting board, and the outside of plastic bags which held croisants. He then used the same gloves to grasp potato chips and touch the croissants as he served resident plates. OSM #5, a dietary aide, also wore gloves. With gloves on, he touched contaminated surfaces…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. For R73, the facility staff failed to uphold the resident's dignity by cleaning his fingernails. R73 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to hemiparesis (1) and hemiplegia (2). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 03/09/2024, the resident scored 12 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating R73 was moderately impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. Under Section GG Functional Abilities and Goals. Subsection I. Personal Hygiene. The ability to maintain personal hygiene, including combing hair, shaving, applying makeup, washing/drying face and hands (excludes baths, showers, and oral hygiene) it coded R73 as 01(zero-one)- Dependent - Helper does ALL of the effort. Resident does none of the effort to complete the activity. Or, the assistance of 2 or more helpers is required for the resident to complete the activity. On 06/03/24 at approximately 2:06 p.m., an observation of R73's fingernails on the right -hand wear observed with dirt…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a clean, home-like environment for one of 50 residents in the survey sample, Resident #23. The findings include: For Resident #23 (R23), the facility failed to maintain a home-like environment in the bathroom, where a hole in the dry wall surrounded the toilet pipe, multiple tiles were chipped of the baseboard, the floor was stained, and the bathroom had a strong urine odor. On 6/3/24 at 3:58 p.m., R23 was interviewed. He stated he had concerns about the cleanliness of his bathroom. In the bathroom, four tiles had chipped off from the baseboard area, and were lying beside the back of the toilet. The tile floor was stained with dark areas, especially in the four corners. There was a circular hole in the drywall surrounding the area where the toilet piping went into the wall behind the toilet. There was a strong smell of old urine. When asked if he felt the condition of the bathroom contributed to a home-like environment for him, he stated it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide a written notification upon transfer for one of 50 residents in the survey sample, Resident #27. The findings include: The nurse's note dated, 3/23/24 at 3:49 p.m., documented in part, Resident noted with left sided facial droop, resident c/o (complained of) left facial side numbness. VS (vital signs) done. PA (physician assistant) gave order to send to hospital for stroke, resident is own RP (responsible party). Review of the scanned documents, sent to the hospital with the resident, failed to evidence a written notification was provided to the resident upon transfer. A request was made for the evidence of the written notification on 6/4/24 at 12:21 p.m. On 6/4/24 at 4:50 p.m. ASM (administrative staff member) #3, regional vice president of operations, stated they did not have the written notification. An interview was conducted with RN (registered nurse) #2 on 6/5/24 at 10:40 a.m. When asked when a resident is transferred to the hospital what…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure accurate MDS assessments for one of 50 residents in the survey sample; Resident #79. The findings include: For Resident #79, the facility staff failed to accurately code the admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] regarding the administration of insulin. The 4/13/24 admission MDS assessment was coded as the resident being on insulin, having received seven insulin injections during the seven day look back period. The resident was not on any prescribed insulin. A review of the above MDS assessments revealed the following: In Section N - Medications, was documented, Record the number of days that injections of any type were received during the last 7 days or since admission/entry or reentry if less than 7 days. In the box was typed 7 for seven days. The next part, Insulin documented, Insulin injections - Record the number of days that insulin injections were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 43 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow the comprehensive care plan for three of 50 residents in the survey sample, Residents #73 (R73), R413 and R80. The findings include: 1.For R73, the facility staff failed to follow the comprehensive care plan to keep fingernails clean. R73 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: hemiparesis (1) and hemiplegia (2). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 03/09/2024, the resident scored 12 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating R73 was moderately impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. Under Section GG Functional Abilities and Goals. Subsection I. Personal Hygiene. The ability to maintain personal hygiene, including combing hair, shaving, applying makeup, washing/drying face and hands (excludes baths, showers, and oral hygiene) it coded R73 as 01(zero-one)- Dependent - Helper does ALL of the effort. Resident does…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide ADL(activities of daily living) care for one of 50 residents in the survey sample, Resident #73 (R73). For R73, the facility staff failed to clean his fingernails. R73 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: hemiparesis (1) and hemiplegia (2). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 03/09/2024, the resident scored 12 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating R73 was moderately impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. Under Section GG Functional Abilities and Goals. Subsection I. Personal Hygiene. The ability to maintain personal hygiene, including combing hair, shaving, applying makeup, washing/drying face and hands (excludes baths, showers, and oral hygiene) it coded R73 as 01(zero-one)- Dependent - Helper does ALL of the effort. Resident does none of the effort to complete the activity. Or,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and services for one of 50 residents in the survey sample, Resident #413. For (R413), the facility staff failed to maintain the oxygen flow rate at three liters per minute according to the physician's orders. R413 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to respiratory failure (1). R413's MDS (minimum data set) assessment was in process at the time of the survey, therefore R413's data was not available. The facility's Admission/readmission Evaluation dated 05/24/2024 for R413 documented in part, A. Cognitive/Neurological. 1. Mental Status: a. Alert. 2. Oriented to: a. Person, b. Place, c. Time, d. Situation. On 06/04/2024 at approximately 8:12 a.m., an observation of R413revealed they were lying in bed receiving oxygen by nasal cannula. An observation of the flow meter on the oxygen concentrator revealed an oxygen flow rate between two-and-a-half and three liters per minute. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record for one of 50 residents in the survey sample; Resident #79. The findings include: For Resident #79, the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate clinical record. The facility staff developed a comprehensive care plan for a diagnosis of diabetes. The resident was not diabetic. A review of the admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] regarding the administration of insulin coded as the resident being on insulin, having received seven insulin injections during the seven day look back period. The resident was not on any prescribed insulin. In Section N - Medications, was documented, Record the number of days that injections of any type were received during the last 7 days or since admission/entry or reentry if less than 7 days. In the box was typed 7 for seven days. The next part, Insulin documented, Insulin injections -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices during the medication administration for one of six residents in the medication administration observation, Resident #32 (R32). For R32, the facility staff failed to dispose of medications that were spilled out onto the top of the medication cart and were administered. On 06/04/2024 at approximately at approximately 8:04 a.m., an observation of LPN (licensed practical nurse) #7 during the medication pass was conducted. Observations of PLN #7 revealed she removed six medication bubble packs for R32 from the middle drawer of the medication cart and placed them on top of the medication cart. After verifying then medications with the eMAR (electronic medication administration record), LPN #7 obtained a small plastic medication cup from the end of the medication cart and placed it in front her on the top of the medication cart next the stack of bubble packs for R32. LPN #7 dispensed one-50mg (milligram) pill of hydralazine (1) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to preserve resident dignity when serving meals in one of one facility kitchen. The facility staff served the 7/19/22 lunch meal on disposable Styrofoam containers for all residents, and gave disposable eating utensils to the final seven residents served from the tray line. The findings include: On 7/19/22 at 1:29 p.m., OSM (other staff member) #1, the dietary manager, was observed as he served all resident lunches from the tray line in the facility's only kitchen. OSM #1 served each and every meal on a disposable Styrofoam container. The food was placed on one side of the container, and the other side of the container was folded over to create a cover. Two stacks of facility dishware were observed in a dish cart adjacent to the tray line. Additionally, the last seven Styrofoam containers served were paired with disposable plastic eating utensils. OSM #1 stated: I don't know where the [stainless steel] forks are going. We just don't have enough for everybody. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain confidentiality of residents' medical records for 4 of 33 residents in the survey sample, Residents #7, #88, #25 and #96. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to maintain confidentiality of Resident #7's (R7) durable DNR (do not resuscitate) order. The order was posted on the wall in R7's room. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of [DATE], the resident's cognitive skills for daily decision making was coded as severely impaired. On [DATE] at 2:46 p.m., an observation of R7's room was conducted. The resident's durable DNR order was posted on the wall behind the resident's bed. The order documented R7's name, the date the form was signed and the following: I, the undersigned, state that I have a [NAME] fide physician/patient relationship with the patient named above. I have certified in the patient's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-21 · tag F0622 — patternNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, facility document review and in the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide evidence that all required information was provided to the hospital staff when 4 out of 33 residents in the survey sample were transferred to the hospital; Residents #37, #40, #350 and #1. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to evidence provision of required resident information to a receiving facility at the time of discharge for Resident #37. Resident #37 was transferred to the hospital on 6/27/22. Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to: end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus, heart failure and encephalopathy. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 5/21/22, coded the resident as scoring a 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-21 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide evidence of written RP (responsible party) and/or ombudsman notification was provided for 4 of 33 residents, Residents #37, #40, #29 and #1. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to evidence provision of written RP notification was provided for Resident #37. Resident #37 was transferred to the hospital on 6/27/22. Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to: end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus, heart failure and encephalopathy. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 5/21/22, coded the resident as scoring a 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A review of the MDS Section G-functional status coded the resident as requiring extensive assistance for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-21 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide evidence that bed hold notification was provided when 3 out of 33 residents in the survey sample were transferred to the hospital; Residents #37, #40 and #1. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to evidence provision of bed hold notification for Resident #37. Resident #37 was transferred to the hospital on 6/27/22. Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to: end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus, heart failure and encephalopathy. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 5/21/22, coded the resident as scoring a 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A review of the MDS Section G-functional status coded the resident as requiring extensive assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for 6 of 33 residents in the survey sample, Residents #82, #88, #37, #25, #83 and #94. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to implement Resident #82's (R82) comprehensive care plan for weights per physician's order. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/30/22, the resident scored 9 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. R82's comprehensive care plan dated 10/2/18 documented, (R82) is at risk for alteration ineffective breathing patterns and cardiovascular status due to: CHF (congestive heart failure) .weights as ordered . A review of R82's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 6/3/22 for daily weights. Further review of R82's clinical record only…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice and comprehensive care plan for 4 of 33 residents in the survey sample, Residents #82, #88, #83 and #19. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to obtain Resident's #82 (R82) daily weights per the physician's orders. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/30/22, the resident scored 9 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. R82's comprehensive care plan dated 10/2/18 documented, (R82) is at risk for alteration ineffective breathing patterns and cardiovascular status due to: CHF (congestive heart failure) .weights as ordered . A review of R82's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 6/3/22 for daily weights. Further review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide dialysis care and services for one of 33 residents in the survey sample, Resident #37. The findings include: The facility failed to provide communication to the dialysis facility for 7 of 13 visits in April 2022, 8 of 13 visits in May 2022, 3 of 10 visits in June 2022 and 3 of 5 visits in July 2022. Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to: end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus, heart failure and encephalopathy. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 5/21/22, coded the resident as scoring a 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A review of the MDS Section G-functional status coded the resident as requiring extensive assistance for bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-21 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain sufficient dietary staff to meet the needs of the residents at the lunch meal on 7/19/22 in one of one facility kitchens. There was insufficient staff from the dietary department working at lunch on 7/19/22, resulting in residents' not receiving lunch at a time compatible with community standards, and resulting in residents being served on disposable dishes. The findings include: On 7/19/22 at 11:24 a.m., initial observation of the kitchen revealed OSM (other staff member) #1, the dietary manager, washing dishes from breakfast in the facility dish room. On 7/19/22 at 12:49 p.m., OSM #2, the dietary manager from a sister facility, had arrived in the kitchen, and was encouraging OSM #1. When asked if lunch was being served on time, and at a time compatible to when residents would normally be served lunch in the community, she stated: No there's a delay. She stated she was not sure what time lunch would start. She stated the delay was due to lack of staffing. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-21 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to serve a meal at a time compatible with community standards in one of one facility kitchens. The facility staff did not begin to serve the lunch meal on 7/19/22 until 1:25 p.m. The final resident tray was not distributed until 2:30 p.m. The findings include: On 7/19/22 at 11:24 a.m., initial observation of the kitchen revealed OSM (other staff member) #1, the dietary manager, washing dishes from breakfast in the facility dish room. At this time, no cooked lunch items were visible in the ovens, steam table, or the steamer. On 7/19/22 at 12:49 p.m., a follow up observation was made of the kitchen. OSM #2, the dietary manager from a sister facility, had arrived in the kitchen, and was encouraging OSM #1 as he worked to prepare baked pasta, steamed broccoli, salad, bread, and pureed food for lunch. When asked if lunch was being served on time, and at a time compatible to when residents would normally be served lunch in the community, OSM #2 stated: No there's a delay. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner in one of one facility kitchens. The cook's refrigerator had two opened, unlabeled items. The stove top and convection oven were dirty. OSM (other staff member) #1, the dietary manager, failed to take the holding temperatures of hot, perishable foods on the tray lines prior to serving them on 7/19/22. Trays for individual resident meals were wet nesting, and a dietary staff member used the same drying towel to dry all of them. The findings include: On 7/19/22 at 11:24 a.m., initial observation of the kitchen revealed OSM (other staff member) #1, the dietary manager, washing dishes from breakfast in the facility dish room. Initial observation of the kitchen revealed a dirty stove top. The stove contained heavy amounts of debris on the stove top and in the wells of the burners. Some of the debris was burned on; some of the debris was greasy; some of the debris was composed of particles of old food; some of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-21 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to evidence required annual continuing education (in-service) hours for five of five CNA (certified nursing assistant) records reviewed, CNAs #2, #3, #4, #5, and #6. For CNAs #2, #3, #4, and #5, the facility provided no evidence of dementia training in the past year. For CNA #6, the facility provided no evidence of dementia or abuse training in the past year. The findings include: On 7/19/22 at 4:59 p.m., OSM (other staff member) #5, the human resources director, was given a list of five CNAs for whom evidence of annual continuing education (in-services) was needed. On 7/20/22 at 3:38 p.m., OSM #5 provided continuing education transcripts for CNAs #2, #3, #4, and #5. She did not provide any transcripts for CNA #6. For CNAs #2, #3, #4, and #5, there was no evidence of any annual training in dementia. For CNA #6, there was no evidence of any annual abuse or dementia training. OSM #5 stated she had been told about a waiver which relieved the facility staff of any annual training…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to act upon a reported grievance for a missing personal item for one of 33 residents in the survey sample, Resident #32 (R32). The findings include: The facility staff failed to respond to a known grievance regarding a missing Prevalon boot (boot to keep the heel lifted off the bed, wick moisture and keep the foot and ankle in place) in a timely manner for R32. R32 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to paraplegia and chronic ulcer of left calf. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 5/20/2022, the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section G documented R32 requiring extensive assistance of two or more persons for transfers, personal hygiene and extensive assistance of one person for dressing. Section G…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-21 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to complete a comprehensive assessment with a change in ADL (activity of daily living) status for one of 33 residents in the survey sample, Resident #25 (R25). The findings include: On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 5/22/2022, the resident scored a 10 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident is moderately cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. In Section G - Functional Status, the resident was coded as requiring extensive assistance of one staff member physical assistance for moving in the bed, transfers, moving on the unit, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene and bathing. The resident was coded as requiring supervision with one staff member physical assistance for eating. The MDS prior to the 5/22/2022, an annual assessment, with an ARD of 2/10/2022, the resident scored a 10 out of 15 on the BIMS score, indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-21 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide an accurate assessment for one of 33 residents, Resident #37. The facility staff failed to complete an accurate MDS (minimum data set); annual assessment for Resident #37. The findings include: Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to: end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus, heart failure and encephalopathy. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 5/21/22, coded the resident as scoring a 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A review of the MDS Section G-functional status coded the resident as requiring extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, hygiene and bathing; supervision for locomotion and independence for eating.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-21 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to actively assist one of 33 residents in the survey sample with discharge planning for a resident requested discharge, Resident #32 (R32). The findings include: The facility staff failed to actively participate when requested by R32 to coordinate a discharge from the facility. R32 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to paraplegia. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 5/20/2022, the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section G documented R32 using a wheelchair and having functional limitations in range of motion in both lower extremities. On 7/19/2022 at 12:59 p.m., an interview was conducted with R32. R32 stated that they were paralyzed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-21 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to assess for a decline in functional status for one of 33 residents in the survey sample, Resident #25 (R25). The findings include: On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 5/22/2022, the resident scored a 10 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. In Section G - Functional Status, the resident was coded as requiring extensive assistance of one staff member physical assistance for moving in the bed, transfers, moving on the unit, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene and bathing. The resident was coded as requiring supervision with one staff member physical assistance for eating. The MDS prior to the 5/22/2022, an annual assessment, with an ARD of 2/10/2022, the resident scored a 10 out of 15 on the BIMS score, indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired for making daily decisions.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care to dependent residents per resident choice for 2 of 33 residents in the survey sample, Resident #32 (R32) and Resident #22 (R22). The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to provide showers per resident choice/preference to R32. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 5/20/2022, the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section G documented R32 requiring extensive assistance of two or more persons for transfers, personal hygiene and extensive assistance of one person for dressing. Section G documented R32 being totally dependent on one person for bathing. On 7/19/2022 at 12:59 p.m., an interview was conducted with R32. R32 stated that they had to ask the staff for showers and that they were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to administer oxygen per the physician order for one of 33 residents in the survey sample, Resident #94 (R94). The findings include: On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, an annual assessment, with an assessment reference date of 7/7/2022, the resident was not coded for cognition. In the nurse's notes it was documented the resident refused to answer the questions. In Section O - Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs, the resident was not coded as using oxygen. Observation was made of R94 on 7/19/2022 at approximately 12:00 p.m. R94 was in the bed with the oxygen on via a nasal cannula. The oxygen concentrator was set with the bottom of the black ball sitting on the 1.5 line and the top of the ball on the 2.0 line. A second observation was made on 7/20/2022 at 2:48 p.m. The oxygen was in use via nasal cannula. The oxygen concentrator was set with the top of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-21 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide medically related social services to one of 33 residents in the survey sample, Resident #32 (R32). The findings include: The facility staff failed to actively assist R32 in coordinating a resident requested discharge from the facility. R32 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to paraplegia. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 5/20/2022, the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section G documented R32 using a wheelchair and having functional limitations in range of motion in both lower extremities. On 7/19/2022 at 12:59 p.m., an interview was conducted with R32. R32 stated that they were paralyzed and used a manual wheelchair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to serve food at palatable taste and temperature for 3 of 33 residents in the survey sample, Residents #49 (R49), #28 (R28), #41 (R41). The facility staff failed to serve food at a palatable taste and temperature at lunch on 7/19/22. The findings include: 1. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/10/22, R49 was coded as being cognitively intact for making daily decisions, having scored 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status). On 7/19/22 at 1:01 p.m., an interview was conducted with R49. The resident stated the facility food was lousy, cold, and not good. 2. On the most recent MDS, an annual assessment with an ARD of 5/12/22, R28 was coded as being cognitively intact for making daily decisions, having scored 13 of 15 on the BIMS. On 7/19/22 at 11:45 a.m., R28 stated the food was not good, both in taste and temperature. 3. On the most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-03-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for two of 41 residents in the survey sample, Residents #80 and #55. The facility staff failed to transcribe a physician order for Resident #80's bilateral knee braces accurately to the TAR (treatment administration record). The facility staff failed to clarify multiple as needed pain medication orders for Resident #55 to determine when and which medication to administer based on pain level parameters. The findings include: 1. Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]; with a recent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to end stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis [a procedure used in toxic conditions and renal [kidney] failure, in which wastes and impurities are removed from the blood by a special machine.] (1), peripheral vascular disease [any abnormal condition, including atherosclerosis,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to serve food in a sanitary manner. During the lunch meal on 3/3/2020, OSM (other staff member) #4, a dietary aide, was observed plating food for resident trays. OSM #4 touched multiple items while wearing gloves and then wearing the same gloves touched the food contact, surface area of plates, and grabbed dinner rolls with his hand, placing one on each plate, wearing the same gloves. The findings include: On 3/3/20 at 11:46 AM, an inspection of the tray line service was conducted of the lunch meal. The preparation of the meal trays began at 12:27 PM. The following was observed: OSM #4 (Other Staff Member, dietary aide) was at the steam table, plating the food for each tray. He had gloves on, however; he was noted to be touching multiple items in his vicinity including serving spoon handles, the surface of the steam table, and the handles of a wheeled cart on which plates were stacked at his left side, contaminating his gloves. As he obtained each plate from the cart,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-03-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record for one of 41 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 7. The facility staff failed to document the percentage of food eaten by Resident #7 at meals. The findings include: Resident # 7 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to swallowing difficulties, amnesia, and adult failure to thrive. Resident # 7's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 02/27/2020, coded Resident # 7 as scoring a 12 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 12 - being moderately impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. Resident # 7 was coded as independent and requiring assistance with setup for eating. Section K Swallowing/Nutritional Status coded Resident # 7 under K0300 Weight Loss, 2 [two] Yes, not on physician-prescribed weight-loss regimen. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-03-05 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the kitchen area was free of pests. Two flies were observed flying in the area where dishes were stored on racks for air-drying, and a fly was observed flying around the area of the steam table where the lunch meal foods was already set up but were covered. The findings include: On 3/3/20 at 10:15 AM, an initial kitchen inspection was conducted. Two flies were observed flying in the area where dishes were stored on racks for air-drying, located between the dishwashing area and a storage area across the aisle from the dishwashing area. On 3/3/20 at 12:24 PM, an inspection of the tray line service was conducted of the lunch meal. A fly was observed flying around the area of the steam table where the lunch meal foods was already set up but were covered. A review of the pest control company visits for December 2019, January 2020, and February 2020 revealed a visit dated 2/18/20 which documented, Targeted Pests: Flies, Miscellaneous flies, Other, Fats, Oil,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to promote resident dignity for two of 41 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 82 and # 43. During the lunch meal service on 3/3/2020 Resident #82 and #43, did not receive their meal for approximately 19 minutes, after staff served the five other residents seated at the same table, and the residents were eating their meals. The findings include: Resident # 82 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: heart failure and swallowing difficulties. Resident # 82's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 02/14/2020, coded Resident # 82 as scoring a 15 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 15 - being cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Resident # 82 was coded as requiring supervision and assistance with setup for eating. Resident # 43…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-03-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to immediately notify and consult the physician for a change in condition, for one of 41 residents in the survey sample, Resident #93. The facility staff identified an unstageable wound on Resident #93's left heel on 11/19/19, and failed to immediately notify and consult the physician and wound care nurse about the wound and treatment initiated, until 11/22/19. The findings include: A review of the facility policy, Notification of Change in Condition documented, The nurse to notify the attending physician and Resident Representative when there is a(n): *Accident, *Significant change in the patient/resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status, *Need to alter treatment significantly . Resident #93 was admitted on [DATE]; diagnoses include but are not limited to peripheral vascular disease, stricture of artery, occlusion and stenosis of right and left carotid arteries, stroke, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-03-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to implement the facility abuse policy for reporting an allegation of abuse for one of 41 residents in the survey sample, Resident #89. Resident #89 alleged a CNA (certified nursing assistant) had abused him causing a scratch on the left elbow that was bleeding on 2/21/2020 at 5:30 a.m. The facility staff did not report the allegation to the State Agency until 2/21/20 at 11:21 AM, approximately five hours and fifty-one minutes after the alleged abuse occurred. The findings include: Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurological disorder) (1), congestive heart failure (abnormal condition characterized by circulatory congestion and retention of salt and water by the kidneys (2), dementia (progressive state of mental decline, memory function and judgement) (3). Resident #89's most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-03-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse in a timely manner for one of 41 residents in the survey sample, Resident #89. On 2/21/2020 at 5:30 a.m., Resident #89 alleged a CNA (certified nursing assistant) had abused him causing a scratch on the left elbow that was bleeding, and was not reported to the State Agency until 2/21/20 at 11:21 AM, five hours and fifty-one minutes after the alleged abuse occurred. The findings include: Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurological disorder) (1), congestive heart failure (abnormal condition characterized by circulatory congestion and retention of salt and water by the kidneys (2), dementia (progressive state of mental decline, memory function and judgement) (3). Resident #89's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-03-05 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to evidence an accurate PASARR (preadmission screening and resident review) screening for one of 41 residents in the survey sample, Resident #69. The facility failed to ensure an accurate PASARR was completed upon admission for Resident #69. The findings include: Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #69's diagnoses included but were not limited to: dementia (progressive state of mental decline, memory function and judgement) (1), bipolar disorder (mental disorder characterized by mania and depression) (2), psychosis (mental disorder with detachment from reality and impaired perceptions and thinking) (3). Resident #69's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 2/6/20, coded the resident as scoring 99 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was unable to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-03-05 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan for one of 41 residents in the survey sample, Resident #348. The facility failed to develop a baseline care plan to include and address the care of Resident #348's PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter). The findings include: Resident #348 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #348's diagnoses that included but are not limited to: cellulitis (inflammation of tissue) (1), diabetes mellitus (altered glucose metabolism caused by the inability of insulin to function normally in the body) (2) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic non-reversible lung disease) (3). Resident #348's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, an admission assessment, with an assessment reference date of 2/21/20, coded the resident as scoring 13 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record for one of 41 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 7. The facility staff failed to document the percentage of food eaten at meals for Resident #7. The findings include: Resident # 7 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to swallowing difficulties, amnesia, and adult failure to thrive. Resident # 7's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 02/27/2020, coded Resident # 7 as scoring a 12 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 12 - being moderately impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. Resident # 7 was coded as independent and requiring assistance with setup for eating. Section K Swallowing/Nutritional Status coded Resident # 7 under K0300 Weight Loss, 2 [two] Yes, not on physician-prescribed weight-loss regimen. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for two of 41 residents in the survey sample, (Residents # 4 and Resident #7). The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #4 received only nectar-thickened liquids per the physician orders. On 3/3/2020 during the lunch meal CNA (certified nursing assistant) # 3, was observed providing Resident # 4 two sips thin consistency juice by use of a straw. The facility staff failed to administer Mighty House Shake [liquid dietary supplement] to Resident # 7 according to the physician order. The findings include: 1. Resident # 4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: aphasia [1] and swallowing difficulties. Resident # 4's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-03-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide care and services for the prevention and treatment of pressure injuries for two of 41 residents in the survey sample, Residents #80 and #93. For Resident #93 the facility staff failed to provide care and services for the treatment of a pressure wound once identified, for 3 days. On 11/19/19, the facility staff identified an unstageable wound on the left heel. The physician and wound care nurse were not notified of the wound and treatment was not initiated until 11/22/19. The facility staff failed to transcribe a physician order for Resident #80's bilateral knee braces accurately to the TAR (treatment administration record), as a result staff failed to ensure Resident #80's bilateral knee braces were kept open while the resident was in bed to prevent the development of a pressure injury. The findings include: 1. Resident #93 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-03-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure a PPD [purified protein derivative] [1] vial was dated when opened and an expired PPD vial were not available for use in one of one medication storage rooms inspected, second floor medication room. The findings include: On 03/05/20 at 8:36 a.m., an observation of the facility's medication room on the second floor was conducted with RN [registered nurse] # 3. Upon entering the medication room, a small refrigerator was observed under the counter on the left side of the room. Observation of the inside of the refrigerator revealed a small red plastic tray containing two multi-dose vials of PPD that were available for use. When asked if the vials of PPD were opened, RN # 3 stated yes. Observation of the first vial failed to evidence an open date. The second opened vial of PPD documented an open date of 1/28/2020. When asked about the first vial of PPD not having an open date, RN # 3 observed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to implement infection control practices for one of 41 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 4. During the lunch meal observation on 3/3/2020, CNA (certified nursing assistant) #3 was not observed sanitizing or washing their hands while after assisting a resident with their meal and before they resumed assisting Resident #4 with their meal. The findings include: Resident # 4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: aphasia [1] and swallowing difficulties. Resident # 4's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 02/27/2020, coded Resident # 4 as scoring a three on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, three - being severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. Resident # 4 was coded as requiring extensive assistance of one staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-07-21 · tag F0574 — widespreadThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide the email address of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, in the posted information on the wall by the elevators on the ground, first and second floors. The findings include: On 7/19/22 at 2:30 PM, this surveyor reviewed the information posted on the wall by the elevators on the ground, first and second floors. It was observed that the information included the mailing address and phone number of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman but was missing the email address. On 7/20/22 at 7:00 AM, RN (registered nurse) #1 confirmed the email address was not included in the information posted on the wall. On 7/20/22 at approximately 5:30 PM, ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the administrator, ASM #2, the director of nursing and ASM #3, the regional director of clinical services were made aware of the findings. No further information was provided prior to exit.
- No harm found · Bcited before2020-03-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to serve food at palatable temperatures for meal enjoyment during the lunch meal service on 3/3/2020. The findings include: On 3/3/20 at 11:46 AM, an inspection of the tray line service was conducted of the lunch meal. Temperatures of the lunch meal were obtained at the steam table as follows, by OSM #2 (Other Staff Member, the dietary manager), using a facility thermometer: - Mashed potatoes 169 degrees Fahrenheit (F). - Puree green beans 178 degrees - Puree pork 171 degrees - [NAME] 203 degrees - Pork loin 189 degrees - Mechanical pork 186 degrees - [NAME] beans 183 degrees On 3/3/20 at 2:15 PM, a test tray was conducted of the lunch meal with OSM #2. The following temperatures were obtained by OSM #2 using a facility thermometer: - Mashed potatoes 134 degrees Fahrenheit (F). This was a 35-degree drop in temperature. - Puree green beans 137 degrees F. This was a 41-degree drop in temperature. - Puree pork 127 degrees F. This was a 44-degree drop in temperature. -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$12,834 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $12,834 — penalty dated 2024-06-06
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 86 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 86; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| SKILLED VENTURE LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2022 |
| KAHANOW, AVIVA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2022 |
| M&T BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | since 12/01/2022 |
| HARMAN, DINA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2022 |
| JENKINS, DARNELL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/26/2023 |
| LAW, JOSEPH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2022 |
| VIROJA, YOGESH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2022 |
| POSEN, MINDEE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2022 |
| MARQUIS LIMITED LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/20/2025 |
| RELIANT PRO REHAB LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/20/2025 |
| MOUSTAFA HUSSEIN, WESAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2022 |
| FLAGLER, OSHER | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/27/2025 |
| ROKEACH, FRAIDE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/21/2025 |
| ROKOWSKY, YITZCHOK | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/27/2025 |
| BELMONT BAY PROPERTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2022 |
| NFR 2020 IRRV TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2022 |
| QUINTO NEXGEN LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2022 |
| RSBRMK HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2022 |
| SK NEXGEN TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2022 |
| TRYKO NEXGEN HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2022 |
| UAK 2020 IRRV TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2022 |
| UKR NEXGEN LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2022 |
| YK NEXGEN TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2022 |
| YR NEXGEN TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 33% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in VA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495361. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-06-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.