No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lawrence Rehabilitation Hospital

2381 Lawrenceville Road, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 56 certified beds · (609) 896-9500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (609) 896-9500 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0610) — most recent Jan 2026
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3131 Princeton Pike · (609) 896-2922 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3131 Princeton Pike · (877) 723-6005 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2811 US Highway 1 · (609) 771-4341 · Call to confirm hours
Park
27 Merion Pl · (609) 912-1122 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine67.1%80.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.1%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.1%8.1%12.0%better

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 661 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

63.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
99.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.94U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.47hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.37hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 99.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 132 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.94 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF63.1%CMS range 59.6–66.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.4%CMS range 10.6–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge99.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge91.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge84.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.7%CMS range 7.3–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.001.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.01
RN hours/ resident / day
1.53
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.11
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.65
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.51
RN hoursweekends
37.0%
Total nursing turnover
46.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 56 beds and averages 53.6 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.01 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.88 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.20 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

23
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-30)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-06)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to inform and offer written information regarding the option to formulate an Advance Directive. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #9 and Resident #69) reviewed for AD, and affected all residents who resided in the facility. The evidence was as follows:a. On 1/28/26 at 10:43 AM, Resident #9 was observed in bed, and they were unable to participate in an interview with the surveyor due to confusion. On 1/28/26 at 10:31 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #9 which revealed the following: A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; malignant neoplasm of the prostate (prostate cancer), dementia (loss of intellectual functioning) and peripheral vascular disease (blood vessels usually in the legs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0836 — widespread
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents who required Medicaid were admitted to the facility per the facility SNF/NF (Skilled Nursing Facility/Nursing Facility) designation from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid (CMS) and per the New Jersey Department of Health (DOH). The deficient practice affected all residents admitted to the facility and was evidenced by the following: On 01/27/26 at 11:04 AM, during the facility entrance conference held with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), and an Executive [NAME] President (EVP) the surveyor asked what the resident population of the facility was. The LNHA confirmed the residents were all short term, and there were no long-term care residents at the facility. When asked if the facility's residents met and had an organized group meeting (Resident Council Meeting).The LNHA stated there was no resident council meeting held at the facility. When the surveyor again asked about long-term care residents at the facility, the LNHA confirmed that there was no long-term care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive, effective data driven Quality Assurance Program (QAPI) that included self-identifying areas for improvement and maintaining documentation of QAPI initiatives. The deficient practice affected all residents who resided at the facility and was evidenced by the following:Refer to F620, F627, F881 On 01/30/26 at 9:12 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) regarding how the facility determines what was reviewed by the QAPI team and how QAPI plans were developed. The LNHA stated skin issues, and fall concerns were reviewed. The LNHA stated trends were reviewed, including the dates and the trends were analyzed. The surveyor asked what all the current facility QAPI initiatives were. The LNHA stated the facility currently had the following QAPI plans which included:A resident who had an incorrect name band. When asked about the data collected. The LNHA stated it was related to one resident and now the facility was 100% compliant. No additional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-30 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to investigate, analyze and monitor adverse events and utilize data to develop activities to prevent further adverse events. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who resided at the facility and was evidenced by the following: On 01/30/26 at 9:12 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) regarding how the facility determines what was reviewed by the QAPI team and how QAPI plans were developed. The surveyor asked if incidents were reviewed, including grievances. The LNHA stated skin issues, and fall concerns were reviewed at QAPI. The LNHA stated trends were reviewed, including the dates and the trends were then analyzed. The surveyor asked for the data and information related to the Falls QAPI and the LNHA provided the following information on falls and stated that was the QAPI plan for falls dated March 2025. The Performance Improvement Project (PIP) for Falls revealed that the Problem or Opportunity for Improvement was identified as Falls…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a system was in place to utilize an infection assessment tool prior to prescribing antibiotics and ensure the Antibiotic Stewardship program was implemented consistently. This deficient practice was identified for (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship, (Resident #84 and Resident # 69) and was evidenced by the following: a. On 1/28/26 at 12:00 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #69's electronic medical record which revealed the following: The admission Record revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to: dementia, retention of urine and benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlargement of the prostate gland). A Nurse Practitioner Note dated 12/5/25 at 10:42 PM revealed reports discomfort to foley catheter insertion area . UA (urinalysis) results discussed, Macrobid started, cultures pending . A Health Status Note, nurse progress note dated 12/5/25 at 11:10 PM, revealed patient stated, started on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to honor the right to self-determination related to resident choices for mealtimes for a resident who attended dialysis treatments three times per week. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 4) reviewed for dialysis care and was evidenced by the following:On 01/27/26 at 11:49 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #4 in their room and they informed the surveyor that they just returned from dialysis (a treatment that removes impurities from the blood when the kidneys do not function). The surveyor observed an opened breakfast tray on the bedside table and the resident stated that the food was cold. Resident #4 stated that they want to have their breakfast upon return from dialysis and the staff were aware of their preference. Resident #4 stated that staff would leave the tray in the room, and they had to eat the cold breakfast meal after their dialysis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently follow a system to ensure a) prior to hire, all employees were pre-screened to ensure that they had not been found guilty in a court of law of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation, or had findings entered into the state nurse aide registry or against a professional license, and b) a process was in place to maintain documentation to confirm an appropriate pre-screening had occurred for all contracted facility employees which including dietary and housekeeping. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 39 employee files reviewed that were provided by the facility.The evidence was as follows:On 1/27/26 at 11:04 AM, during entrance conference, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) a list of all employees that were hired since last survey, including name, date of hire, title, and including contracted employees and their files including medical information. On 1/28/26 at 10:38 AM, the LNHA provided the list of employees, status, position, department,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed to determine abuse or neglect had not occurred after a resident sustained a fall while attempting to transfer self to the bathroom. Resident #55 reported rough handling by the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) who assisted them from the floor to the wheelchair. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #55) reviewed for accidents and was evidenced by the following:On 1/27/26 at 10:58 AM, during the initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #55 seated in a wheelchair in their room. Resident #55 stated, on 1/25/26, I had to go to the bathroom, I rang the call bell and called out for help. No one responded to the call bell for 45 minutes. The urine started to come out, so I attempted to get out of bed by myself, I fell on the floor and hit my head. Resident #55 continued and stated, the Licensed Practical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) initiate a wound treatment order for a newly identified skin tear (Resident #9), and b.) upon admission to the facility, transcribe a resident's (Resident #7) allergy information documented on a hospital discharge summary. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #9) who was reviewed for skin conditions and for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for choices and was evidenced by the following:a. On 1/28/26 at 10:43 AM, Resident #9 was lying in bed he was confused and unable to participate in an interview. The surveyor observed a large bloody gauze type dressing, undated and observed on their left upper arm. On 1/28/26 at 10:31 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #9 which revealed the following: A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; malignant neoplasm of the prostate (prostate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a physician order was followed to ensure a resident's heels for a resident who was at risk for skin breakdown. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Residents #4) reviewed for pressure ulcers and was evidenced by the following:During the initial tour of the 500 Unit on 1/27/26 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #4 lying in bed with the head of bed (HOB) slightly elevated. The surveyor observed that Resident #4's bilateral lower extremities were not offloaded and that Resident #4's feet were lying directly on the mattress. When interviewed, at that time, Resident #4 informed the surveyor that they just returned from dialysis and reported discomfort to the feet.The surveyor exited the room and requested the dialysis communication book from the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) assigned to the unit. The surveyor followed the LPN to the room and both. The surveyor continued the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and review of pertinent documentation it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that appropriate care and services were provided for a resident with a physician order for a bladder scan upon removal of a indwelling urinary catheter. The deficient practice occurred for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for unplanned hospitalization and urinary tract infection (Resident #69). The evidence was as follows: On 1/28/26 at 12:00 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #69's electronic medical record which revealed the following: The admission Record revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to: dementia, retention of urine and benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlargement of the prostate gland). A Progress Note (PN) documented by the Unit Manager (UM) dated 12/23/25 at 7:04 AM which revealed: Went to visit Resident #69 for wound rounds and noted that vomited green colored liquid and was lethargic . and skin extremely hot .patients temperature was 104 Farenheight -F (normal 97 to 99 F) and blood pressure was low .62/48 and 64/58…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the necessary respiratory care and services for a resident with a tracheostomy (trach; a device inserted into a surgically created opening in the neck into the windpipe to help with breathing) in accordance with standard of practice. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for respiratory/tracheostomy care (Resident #77) and was evidenced by the following:On 1/27/26 at 11:42 AM, during the initial tour, Resident #77 was observed asleep, in bed, the head of the bed was elevated and was receiving oxygen (O2) via tracheostomy tube. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #77. According to the admission Record, face sheet, an admission summary, reflected that Resident #77 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: cognitive communication deficit (impairment in communication) and tracheostomy (trach; a device inserted into a surgically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly review dialysis communication sheets post dialysis and informed the physician of new recommendations based on laboratory chemistry obtained at dialysis treatment, and ensure the care plan addressed the care of the dialysis access site. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for dialysis and was evidenced by the following: a. On 1/27/26 at 11:30 AM during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #4 in bed. The resident informed the surveyor they just returned from dialysis treatment.On 1/27/26 at 12:10 PM, the surveyor inquired regarding the dialysis communication book and obtained the communication book from the nurse assigned to the unit.A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses that included, but were not limited to end-stage renal (kidney) disease, dependence on renal dialysis, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, and diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to evaluate the performance of all Certified Nursing Aides (CNAs) on an annual basis. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 5 CNAs whose personnel records were reviewed and was evidenced by the following:On 1/29/26 at 1:33 PM, the surveyor reviewed the Annual Staff Performance Appraisals for five randomly selected CNAs.CNA#1, with a date of hire of 5/24/23, had their most recent Annual Staff Performance Appraisal signed as completed on 3/20/24.CNA#2, with a hire date of 9/8/20, had their most recent Annual Staff Performance Appraisal signed as completed on 4/8/24.CNA#3, with a hire date of 3/27/23, had their most recent Annual Staff Performance Appraisal signed as completed on 8/24/24.On 1/30/26 at 11:41 AM, the survey team met with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) regarding concerns with the annual performance appraisals. The LNHA stated that the 2025 evaluations would not be completed until 2026. She further stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a.) Lokelma (sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, a potassium binder for those with high potassium) a medication was administered in accordance with manufacturer's specifications for one (1) of four (4) nurses observed b.) Questran (cholestyramine used to lower cholesterol), a medication was labeled with cautionary instructions for proper administration, for one (1) of four (4) residents observed during the medication pass, c.) quality control testing (calibration) was conducted for the blood glucose (bg) monitors, both used for residents as per manufacturer's specifications, for two (2) of two (2) medication carts inspected, d.) consistent disposition (destruction), reconciliation, and accountability of the controlled dangerous substance (narcotic; medications, with high potential for abuse, were tracked with detail) for one (1) of one (1) medication carts inspected, and e.) consistent maintenance of the system…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist identified irregularities during the drug regimen review of a newly admitted resident. The deficient practice was identified for one (1) of four (4) residents observed during the medication pass (Resident #55). Refer to 755. Reference:According to the manufacturer's specifications for Lokelma section 2.3 Reconstitution and Administration: In general, Lokelma should be administered at least 2 hours before and 2 hours after Lokelma. According to the manufacturer's specifications for Questran under Drug Interaction; since Questran may bind other drugs given concurrently, it is recommended that patients take other drugs at least one hour before or four (4) to 6 hours after Questran (or at as great an interval as possible) to avoid impeding their absorption. On 1/29/26 at 9:19 AM, during the medication pass observation, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) prepare 14 medications for Resident #55 that included Lokelma and Questran. A review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene for 2 of 2 staff observed and disinfect shared medical equipment prior to and after use, in accordance with facility infection control policy. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 1/27/26 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor observed a signage posted at the entrance door of Resident #4's room. The signage indicated Enhanced Barrier Precaution. There was a Personal Protective Equipment box hung outside the door that included gowns and gloves. The surveyor then observed the LPN approached the room with the medication cart and a blood pressure machine. The LPN placed the medication cart next to the entrance door. The LPN, donned (put on) gloves and a gown and entered the room without first performing hand hygiene. The LPN then used the gloved hands to remove the resident's blanket, located the dialysis access site on the resident chest, palpated the dressing, returned the blanket on top of the resident, then used the blood pressure machine to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a) Certified Nursing Aides (CNAs) received 12 hours of mandatory annual in-service training for 2 of 5 CNAs reviewed and b) CNA education included abuse training for 3 of 5 CNA education files reviewed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 1/29/2026 at 1:33 PM, the surveyor reviewed the in-service education hours for five randomly selected CNAs, which were provided by the facility.The [Name Redacted] Transcripts provided showed the following: CNA#1, with a hire date of 5/24/23, had 3.4 hours of education from 5/24/24 - 5/24/25, which did not include training on abuse. The last abuse training documented was 7/3/24. CNA#2, with a hire date of 9/8/20, had 4.98 hours of education from 9/8/24 - 9/8/25. CNA#4, with a hire date of 5/8/24, had a most recent abuse training dated 5/8/24. CNA#5, with a hire date of 5/6/24, had a most recent abuse training dated 8/1/24. On 1/30/26 at 11:28 AM, the facility provided an education calendar listing all education…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0620 — isolated
    Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the admission Agreement did not required residents to waive their right to receive 30-day written notice of discharge. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for appropriate discharge (Resident # 71) and was evidenced by the following: On 1/27/26 at 1:05 PM, the surveyor reviewed the facility entrance binder (a binder that contained the required recertification survey documentation per the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid-CMS- entrance conference requirements) that was provided by the LNHA. A 44 Page Welcome Packet was identified as the facility admission Agreement. The Notice of Resident's Rights Regarding Transfer or discharge: You may be transferred or discharged for one of the following reasons: 1. The move is necessary for your own welfare, and your needs cannot be met withing the facility. 2. Your health has improved sufficiently so that you no longer need the services provided by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of pertinent documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an appropriate discharge process was in place for residents who had a change in payor source. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for appropriate discharge (Resident #71) and was evidenced by the following: On 01/27/26 at 11:04 AM, during the facility entrance conference held with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), and an Executive [NAME] President (EVP) the surveyor asked what the resident population of the facility was. The LNHA stated the residents were all short term, and there were no long-term care residents at the facility. When asked if the facility held resident council meetings, the LNHA stated there was no resident council meeting held at the facility. When the surveyor again asked about long-term care residents at the facility, the LNHA confirmed that there was no long-term care residents at the facility, only short term. The LNHA then stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of medical records, other facility documentation, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, for 3 of 19 residents reviewed (Resident #71, Resident # 72, and Resident #74). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 1/28/2026 at 9:25 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #71 which revealed an admission record (face sheet) with diagnoses that included but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness) following CVA (stroke) affecting the right dominant side and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).The individual comprehensive care plan (ICCP) included a focus area initiated 10/27/25 of discharge potential with interventions which included referrals to other community agencies as deemed appropriate. A social service late entry note dated 12/4/25 indicated Resident #71 had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop or initiate a comprehensive, person-centered care plan to address a.) the care of a Foley catheter. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 27 residents (Resident #80) reviewed for a comprehensive Care Plan (CP) and was evidenced by the following:On 1/27/2 at 11:45 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #80 in the room sitting in a wheelchair by the bed. Resident #80 was awake and alert and able to answer the surveyor's inquiry. The resident informed the surveyor that they were in Physical therapy this morning and they were admitted to the facility for rehabilitation. The surveyor observed that Resident #80 wore a urinary catheter leg bag. The surveyor reviewed the Electronic Health Record (EHR) of Resident #80. The admission Record documented that Resident # 80 was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to diabetes mellitus, hypertension and atherosclerotic heart disease of native…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to post the nursing staffing report daily. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/27/26, on entrance and initial tour, the survey team did not observe the nursing staffing report to be posted in the facility.On 1/28/26 at 12:56 PM, the surveyor did not observe the nursing staffing posted in the lobby, on the second floor, or on the fifth floor.On 1/28/2026 at 1:06 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) about the posted staffing. She stated it is posted on floors two and five by the time clock. LNHA walked with surveyor to the second-floor time clock, staffing was not observed to be posted there. The LNHA stated she observed it posted there yesterday. admitted that it should be posted there.On 1/29/2026 at 9:56 AM, the surveyor interviewed the staffing coordinator who stated the supervisors are responsible for posting the staffing. She further stated they had a new supervisor, who was educated yesterday when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility who had been in an active COVID-19 (potentially, deadly virus) outbreak since 08/21/24, failed to conduct complete and thorough contact tracing (method used to identify COVID-19 exposure and prevent transmission) upon the identification of a single new case of COVID-19 in a resident or staff member in accordance with the facility policy, Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Local Health Department, State Health Department and all current guidance related to infection control. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident, (Resident #21) reviewed for COVID-19. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/03/24 at 7:26 AM, the surveyor entered the facility and was informed by the Registered Nurse Night Supervisor (RNNS) that the facility was in an active outbreak and the last positive resident (Resident #21) was expected to complete isolation precautions that day. There was signage posted on the front door of the facility and at the receptionist desk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous food to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/03/24 at 8:46 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen, the surveyor observed the following in the walk-in meat freezer in the presence of two (2) Food Service Directors (FSD #1 and FSD #2). 1. An opened slab of roast beef on the top shelf was not labeled or dated. 2. An opened bag containing six (6) salisbury patties was not labeled or dated. At that time, during an interview with the surveyor, FSD #1 stated, everything that is in the freezer should have dates. Once it is opened, it should be dated. FSD #2 discarded the roast beef and salisbury patties. On 09/05/24 at 1:15 PM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator stated, when food packages are opened, it should be labeled and dated with the use by date. A review of the facility policy titled Food Receiving and Storage (revised November 2022)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-06 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that their Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program's (QAPI) sources of quantitative data was being analyzed to evaluate program effectiveness and implement new processes. This deficient practice was identified during the standard survey and was evidenced by the following: Refer to S1410 On 09/03/24 at 08:32 AM, during the entrance conference the surveyor requested the facility's QAPI book. On 09/06/24 at 08:45 AM, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) provided the QAPI book. A review of the QAPI book revealed that the facility started a QAPI in January of 2024 on the two-step tuberculosis (TB) skin test (a procedure that helps determine if a person has a recent TB infection or a boosted reaction to an old infection) for employee health and that the Infection Preventionist (IP) and Human Resources (HR) were responsible to audit the active employee files which was ongoing. Further review of the QAPI book revealed that in April 2024 the two-step…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure full implementation of the antibiotic stewardship program, including ongoing monitoring and use of a nationally recognized surveillance criteria prior to consulting the prescriber. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for antibiotic stewardship, (Resident #27). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/04/24 at 9:38 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Infection Preventionist (IP) regarding the facility Antibiotic Stewardship Program (efforts to ensure that antibiotics are used only when necessary and appropriate). The IP stated that she had worked at the facility for nearly one year and had worked as an IP since 2019. When the surveyor asked the IP to describe how the Antibiotic Stewardship Program worked she stated, With a prayer. The IP stated that she monitored residents on antibiotics. When the surveyor requested to view the Antibiotic Stewardship documentation, the IP stated that she would need to run a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the administration of a resident's enteral tube feeding (allows liquid food to enter the stomach or intestine through a tube) was consistently documented to indicate if it were administered or held on the Medication Administration Record. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident, (Resident #27) reviewed for tube feedings. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour of the facility on 09/03/24 at 8:38 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #27 lying awake in bed. The resident stated that their tube was clogged four to five weeks ago. A review of Resident #27's admission Record (an admission summary) revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnosis which included but was not limited to: other pneumonia (lung infection), and dysphagia, pharyngeal phase (problems in the throat during swallowing). A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a) ensure that meals were consistently delivered on time as per resident's preferences for seven (7) of 21 residents (Resident #5, #18, #147, #199, #202, #203 and #204) which represented two (2) of two (2) units reviewed for mealtime preferences and b) make reasonable accommodation of needs and preferences for 1 of 21 residents reviewed, (Resident #244). This deficient practice was evidenced as follows: 1.On 5/23/23 at 10:10 AM, a resident council meeting was conducted with five residents. Five out of five residents stated that the meals were not delivered on time and were consistently late. On 5/23/23 at 12:00 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #147 seated in a wheelchair in his/her room and was agreeable to be interviewed. During the interview at 12:15 PM, the Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) #1 brought the resident his/her lunch tray. The resident stated that he/she had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY NJ00161372 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards a.) accurately transcribe a physician order, for 1 of 2 residents observed during medication pass (Resident #150), b.) ensure that residents' medications were available for medication administration for 2 of 2 residents observed during medication pass (Resident #149 and Resident #150) and c). ensure that all routine medications on the physician order's sheet (POS), and medication administration record (MAR) had a corresponding medical indication for 10 of 21 residents reviewed (Residents #150, #149, #5, #18, #35, #147,#145, #146, #248 and #249). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the safe and appetizing temperatures of hot and cold food and drink served to the residents. This deficient practice was identified for four (4) of five (5) residents interviewed during the Resident Council meeting and confirmed during the lunchtime meal service on 6/2/21 for 2 of 2 nursing units tested for food temperatures by four surveyors and was evidenced by the following: On 5/23/23 at 10:10 AM, the surveyor met with five (5) residents for council meeting. Four out of five residents stated that they were displeased with food temperatures and that hot food items were not served hot. 06/02/23 11:36 AM, the Registered Dietitian (RD) surveyor calibrated two state issued digital thermometers via the ice bath method to 32 degrees Fahrenheit (F) in the presence of the survey team. On 6/02/23 at 11:53 AM, the surveyors observed the Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) #1 delivering lunch meals…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-02 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident's dietary preferences were consistently identified and implemented for eight (8) of eight (8) residents (Resident #5, #18, #145, #147,#199, #202, #203 and #204) which represented two (2) of two (2) units reviewed for dietary preferences. This deficient practice was evidenced as follows: On 5/23/23 at 10:10 AM, a resident council meeting was conducted with five residents. Five of five residents stated that they did not receive food that they ordered from the menu and that items were missing from their meal trays. In addition, five of five residents stated that someone brings them menus to fill out, but the menus are often not picked up. Resident # 202 stated that the following occurred: I asked for rice crispy cereal and a banana and for some reason they gave me pancakes and other things I don't want, and he/she also stated that they received cereal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-02 · tag F0836 — pattern
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY NJ00161372 Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility provided documentation, the facility failed to a.) ensure call bells were answered timely for 4 of 21 residents reviewed (Residents #151, #204, #244 and #246) and b.) maintain the required minimum direct care staff-to-resident ratios as mandated by the state of New Jersey for 32 of 48-day shifts and 2 of 48 evening shifts reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) memo, dated 1/28/2021, Compliance with N.J.S.A. (New Jersey Statutes Annotated) 30:13-18, new minimum staffing requirements for nursing homes, indicated the New Jersey Governor signed into law P.L. 2020 c 112, codified at N.J.S.A. 30:13-18 (the Act), which established minimum staffing requirements in nursing homes. The following ratio(s) were effective on 2/01/21: One Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) to every eight residents for the day shift. One direct care staff member to every 10 residents for the evening shift,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean/homelike and sanitary environment for the residents. This deficient practice was identified on 1 of 2 nursing units and was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour of the 2nd floor unit on 05/22/23 from 10:06 AM to 01:35 PM, the following was observed by the surveyors: 1. In room [ROOM NUMBER] (double occupancy room): -the wall behind A bed (bed closest to the door) had multiple areas of white substance with multiple open holes and scrape marks -the wall on the opposite side of the room had multiple areas of white substance with multiple open scrapes 2. In room [ROOM NUMBER] (listed as a private room): -the wall behind A bed had multiple areas of white substance with multiple open holes and scrape marks -the same wall as A bed (beyond the bed headboard) but in an open area above the electrical outlet there were multiple areas of white substance with multiple open holes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) maintain the necessary care and services for residents who were receiving oxygen (O2) treatment according to standards of practice and b.) ensure a physician's order was obtained for a resident receiving O2. This deficient practice was identified for two (2) of two (2) residents (R # 146 and R # 145) reviewed for respiratory care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 5/24/23 at 12:00 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #146 awake and seated in a wheelchair across from the nurse's station. Oxygen was in use via a nasal cannula (consisting of two hollow prongs projecting from a hollow face piece) at two liters per minute (LPM). The oxygen was attached to a portable oxygen tank attached to the back of the wheelchair. The O2 tubing was undated. On 5/25/23 at 12:18 PM, the surveyor observed the resident awake and seated in a wheelchair inside his/her room with oxygen in use at two LPM via nasal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to properly secure medications in 1 (one) of 2 (two) emergency crash carts inspected. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/31/23 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor inspected the 2nd-floor emergency crash cart that contained the facility's Emergency-Kit (E-Kit) in the presence of a Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM#1). The surveyor observed the crash cart which was covered and secured by Velcro straps. The surveyor observed LPN/UM #1 remove the covering and then move a handle on the top portion of the crash cart from the locked to unlocked position. The surveyor then observed LPN/UM#1 open each drawer of the crash cart and the surveyor observed the third drawer contained syringes and the 4th drawer contained a E-Kit box that contained 14 medications. The surveyor inspected the E-Kit box that contained the following medications: 1. Albuterol 0.083% nebulizer solution (5 nebulizers) 2. Aspirin 81 mg chewable tablets (4 tablets) 3. BD POSIFLUSH INJ 0.9% (two) 4.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices by ensuring a.) appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn in a room where a resident was on contact precautions (contact precautions are intended to prevent transmission of infectious agents and microorganisms, which are spread by direct or indirect contact with the patient), this was identified on one (1) of two (2) units, b.) housekeeping staff wear gloves appropriately on 1 of 2 units, c.) disposable PPE was appropriately contained in rooms where residents were identified as COVID - 19 positive, this was identified for two (2) of three (3) rooms on the fifth floor unit, and d.) one (1) of (1) resident (Resident #196) identified as exposed to COVID-19 positive nurse staff member was tested in accordance to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. This deficient practice was evidenced as follows:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-06-02 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notification of the emergency transfer to the resident, resident representative, and the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) for one (1) of one (1) residents' (Resident # 144), reviewed for hospitalizations. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the closed medical record of Resident #144. Review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the electronic History and Physical dated 3/13/23, indicated diagnoses which included but not limited to; pleural effusion, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, unspecified asthma, uncomplicated, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus without complications. Review of the Physicians Orders (PO) indicated a handwritten PO dated 3/20/23, to send pt [patient] to [name redacted] ER [emergency room] for large left pleural effusion. Further review of the electronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 86 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avalon Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHamilton, NJ 1 of 5Bay Harbor Post Acute Healthcare CenterSalisbury, MD 1 of 5Blueberry Hill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CtrBeverly, MA 1 of 5Canterbury Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5Cape Cod Post Acute CareBrewster, MA 1 of 5Crest Pointe Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterPt Pleasant, NJ 1 of 5Highland Park Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterChelsea, MA 1 of 5Mount Holly Rehabilitation & Healthcare CenterLumberton, NJ 1 of 5Nashua Post Acute CareNashua, NH 2 of 5Arbor Ridge Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWayne, NJ 2 of 5Atlantic View Post AcuteNewport News, VA 2 of 5Bayview Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterNorth Kingstown, RI 2 of 5Collingswood Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRockville, MD 2 of 5Elmhurst Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterProvidence, RI 2 of 5Graduate Post AcutePhiladelphia, PA 2 of 5Heritage Hills Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSmithfield, RI 2 of 5Laurel Brook Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMount Laurel, NJ 2 of 5Lawrence Rehab & Hcc/The Meadows At LawrenceLawrenceville, NJ 2 of 5Lighthouse Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRevere, MA 2 of 5Lincolnwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterNorth Providence, RI 2 of 5North End Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterBoston, MA 2 of 5Orchard Hill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Palm Springs Post AcuteChelmsford, MA 2 of 5Riverview Healthcare CommunityCoventry, RI 2 of 5Roosevelt Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterPhiladelphia, PA 2 of 5Southampton Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5Springfield Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterSpringfield, PA 2 of 5West Chester Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWest Chester, PA 2 of 5Westgate Hills Rehab & Healthcare CtrBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Willow Brook Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWilmington, MA 2 of 5YORK Post AcuteYorktown, VA 3 of 5Alexandria Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 3 of 5Aspen Hill Rehabiliation & Healthcare CenterHaverhill, MA 3 of 5Belmont Bay Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWoodbridge, VA 3 of 5Brighton Post Acute CareBrighton, MA 3 of 5Cambridge Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMoorestown, NJ 3 of 5Capitol Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHarrisburg, PA 3 of 5Chelsea Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterGoochland, VA 3 of 5Exton Post AcuteExton, PA 3 of 5Hampden Post AcuteWilbraham, MA

Showing 40 of 86; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SYNOVOUS BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 02/01/2023
HARMAN, DINAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
ONYENEMEZU, JENELLEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
VARMA, PURTIIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2023
VIROJA, YOGESHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
POSEN, MINDEEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
MARQUIS LIMITED LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
NUTRACO LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
JAIN, MADHUIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
FLAGLER, OSHERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2025
KAHANOW, AVIVAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2025
LEVOVITZ, TZVIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2025
ROKEACH, FRAIDEIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2025
ROKOWSKY, YITZCHOKIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2025
LAWRENCE REAL PROPERTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
NFR 2020 IRRV TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
QUINTO NEXGEN LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
RSBRMK HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
SK NEXGEN TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
TRYKO NEXGEN HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
UAK 2020 IRRV TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
UKR NEXGEN LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
YK NEXGEN TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
YR NEXGEN TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315127. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next