Crest Pointe Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 174 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 102.9 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.05 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.14 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-06-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint NJ #: 174364 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their abuse policies and procedures by ensuring residents were free from verbal abuse. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse, Resident #60 and #79, and was evidenced by the following: 1. Resident #79, who had diagnoses which included post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depression reported to the Social Worker (SW) on 5/16/24, that Certified Nursing Aide (CNA #1) made sexual comments towards Resident #79 which included CNA #1 stating, bend over; you will like it, and that the resident's messy hair made the resident look sexy. This was witnessed by the nursing aide (NA) and Rehabilitation Director (Rehab Director). Resident #79 reported that the comments by CNA #1 made them feel uncomfortable. The SW handled the incident as a grievance, which was reported as Resident #79 having a poor service interaction…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-06-12 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint # NJ 173248; 174364 Based on interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility's Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) failed to ensure staff, as well as himself, implemented the facility's abuse policies and procedures to ensure resident safety and well-being by a.) ensuring Resident #79 was free from verbal sexual abuse and b.) ensure Resident #60 was free from verbal abuse. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #60 and #79). Resident #79, who had diagnoses which included post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depression reported to the Social Worker (SW) on 5/16/24, that Certified Nursing Aide (CNA #1) made sexual comments which included bend over; you will like it; and the resident's messy hair made them look sexy. This was witnessed by the nursing aide (NA), Rehabilitation Director (Rehab Director). Resident #79 reported that the comments by CNA #1 made them feel uncomfortable. The SW handled the incident as a grievance, which was reported as Resident #79…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) maintain kitchen equipment in a clean, safe and sanitary manner and b) maintain proper temperatures and logs for 2 of 2 freezer units on the nursing units. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 9/14/25 at 10:28 AM, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), the surveyor observed the following:1. The can-opener blade had a metal chip on the left side. The FSD acknowledged it had not been changed. The FSD was unable to produce a maintenance log to indicate when the blade should be replaced.2. The microwave had multicolored food debris on the interior ceiling. The FSD acknowledged the debris and agreed that it was not cleaned according to facility policy. 3. One of two convention ovens (upper unit), had baked on food debris on two of the glass doors and also on the interior surfaces. The FSD did not have a cleaning schedule and acknowledged and agreed that it was not cleaned according to the facility policy. 4. One of three coffee dispenser nozzles, had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to; a) maintain and clean the interior of 1 of 2, (Bayside), nursing unit ice machines, and b) ensure that clean linen was stored in a manner to prevent contamination, assist in the prevention of infection(s), and be free of dirt, dust and debris as evidenced by the following: On 9/15/2025 at 11:25 AM, the surveyor toured the Bayside unit ice machine with the Licensed Practical Nurse/ Unit Manager (LPN/UM #1). The surveyor observed the ice machine was not clean on the interior of the ice dispenser shoot. The surveyor noted a white sediment and black discoloration on the interior of the ice dispenser shoot. During the tour the LPN/UM #1 stated that it was not cleaned according to facility policy. On 9/15/2025 at 11:50 AM, the surveyor toured the laundry room with the Director of Housekeeping (DoH) and the Regional Housekeeping Director (RDoH). The surveyor observed the personal laundry room, which had dust and cobwebs on the pipes, air conditioner vents, window and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the use of a hand roll (a device used to maintain a resident's hand in a functional position). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #8) reviewed for positioning and mobility and was evidenced by the following:1.) On 9/14/2025 at 10:11 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #8 resting in bed with their eyes open and holding a hand roll in their left hand. On 9/16/2025 at 8:27 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #8.A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to: muscle wasting and atrophy (the loss of muscle mass that results in decreased strength and impaired movement), hemiplegia (total or partial paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body such as the arm, leg, or face) following cerebral infarction (blockage in the brain that causes loss of oxygen)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the resident's living environment in a clean, comfortable, homelike manner. This deficient practice was identified on 1 of 2 Nursing units, (Oceanside) observed and reviewed for environmental concerns. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/16/24 at 10:24 AM, the surveyor toured the oceanside unit with the Food Service Director (FSD), and observed the following concerns: 1) Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] and the hair salon windows had visible litter throughout a grassy area that had bushes. In the bush line and grass area there was an abundance of litter stuck in branches, under the bushes and on the grass. The surveyor observed water bottles, sports drink bottles, wrapping plastic, medical gloves, bubble wrap, soda cans, straws and paper litter. The FSD acknowledged the surveyor's observation and stated, the grounds of the facility should be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a low air loss mattress was accurately set according to the resident's weight and functioning properly in accordance with a physician's order for a resident who was previously identified to have had an alteration in skin integrity.This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for pressure ulcers and was evidenced by the following:On 9/14/25 at 9:53 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #6 lying in bed awake. The resident's air mattress pump was observed to be set at a weight of 180 pounds.On 9/14/25 at 11:26 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #6 lying in bed awake. The air mattress pump was set at 180 pounds. The resident stated that he/she believed they had a pressure ulcer, but they thought that it had since healed.On 9/15/25 at 9:57 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #6 lying in bed with their eyes closed and the air mattress was enveloping (closing in on) their sides. The air mattress pump dial was set to a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: NJ177985 Based on observations, interviews, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 03/28/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment in the common shower rooms, follow their Certified Nursing Assistant job description, follow their Light Housekeeper job description, and follow their cleaning and disinfecting policy. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 units (Oceanside Unit and Bayside Unit), had the potential to affect all residents who used the common shower rooms, and was evidenced by the following: On 03/28/2025 at 11:10 A.M., the surveyor interviewed Resident #3. During this interview the resident stated that the cleanliness of the facility's shower rooms was bad. The resident stated, the shower rooms are bad. Four out of ten for cleanliness. Resident #3 further stated that it was reported to staff that the rooms were not clean, but housekeeping was low on staff and didn't have time to clean them. During a tour of the facility on 03/28/2025 at 11:40 A.M., accompanied by the Housekeeping…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-06-12 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — widespread
  Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a system was in place that non-certified Nursing Aides (NA) did not continue to work in the facility as a NA past 120 days. This deficient practice was identified for 5 of 5 NAs who worked at the facility for more than 120 days reviewed for sufficient staffing (NA #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5), and was evidenced by the following: During entrance conference on 6/3/24 at 9:17 AM, the surveyor asked the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) how the facility's nurse staffing was, and the LNHA stated it was good; that the facility did not need to use Agency staff. The surveyor asked if the facility used non-certified Nursing Aides (NA), and the LNHA stated they did; that past a certain amount of time (that he was unsure of) the NAs could have their own assignments. At that time, the surveyor requested a list of all NAs with their date of hire (DOH). On 6/5/24 at 8:26 AM, the surveyor interviewed NA #1 who stated she had been at the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint NJ #: 174364 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy to report an allegation of: a.) sexual verbal abuse between a staff member and a resident, and b.) verbal abuse between a staff member and a resident to the New Jersey State Department of Health (NJDOH) within two hours. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #60 and #79), and was evidenced by the following: Refer F600 1. On 6/3/24 at 10:58 AM, Resident #79 reported to the surveyor that Certified Nursing Aide (CNA #1) had made sexual comments towards them, and they refused male aides. The resident stated CNA #1 told them to bend over and they replied, no thank you and CNA #1 stated you will like it. The resident continued on another the day; CNA #1 stated Don't take this the wrong way but your hair looks sexy that way. The resident stated that the non-certified Nursing Aide (NA) and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint NJ #: 174364 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy to thoroughly investigate an allegation of: a.) verbal sexual abuse between a staff member and resident, and b.) verbal abuse between a staff member and resident. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #60 and #79), and was evidenced by the following: Refer F600 1. On 6/3/24 at 10:58 AM, Resident #79 reported to the surveyor that Certified Nursing Aide (CNA #1) had made sexual comments towards them, and they refused male aides. The resident stated CNA #1 told them to bend over and they replied, no thank you and CNA #1 stated you will like it. The resident continued on another the day; CNA #1 stated Don't take this the wrong way but your hair looks sexy that way. The resident stated that the non-certified Nursing Aide (NA) and Rehabilitation Director (Rehab Director) were both present, and the comments as well as CNA #1 made them uncomfortable. The resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) ensure that staff were trained to properly assess and document care of the hemodialysis access sites which includes the auscultation/palpation of the atrio-ventricular (AV) fistula (a surgical connection connection between an artery and a vein) for bruit (an abnormal sound generated by turbulent arterial blood flow) and thrill (a palpable sensation of blood flow) to assure adequate blood flow and to monitor the hemodialysis access site for bleeding, signs of infection and pain. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for hemodialysis treatment(Resident #4 and #50) and was evidenced by the following: On 6/6/24 at 10:55 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #50 seated in a wheelchair at the bedside. Upon inquiry, Resident #50 stated that they had kidney failure and was receiving hemodialysis (the filtration of waste when the kidneys are no longer able to do so).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$164,717 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $164,717 — penalty dated 2024-06-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ