Bay Harbor Post Acute Healthcare Center
200 Civic Avenue, Salisbury, MD 21804 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 305 certified beds · (410) 749-1466 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0609, F0610) — most recent Apr 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (94) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $101,131 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-17)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.7% | 20.4% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 12.7% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 29.9% | 22.8% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.7% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.8% | 22.2% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.6% | 16.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.1% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.1% | 5.9% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 32.3% | 25.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.3% | 13.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 72.8% | 80.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 15.5% | 21.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.4% | 9.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.50 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.78 | 1.20 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 462 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 45.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 164 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.5%CMS range 54.8–64.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 8.5–12.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 45.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 43.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 34.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 90.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 83.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 5.2–9.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.95 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 305 beds and averages 226.5 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 78 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
94 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 81 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-10-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure four (Resident #41, Resident #11, Resident #22, and Resident #33) of 23 residents reviewed for abuse were reported/timely reported to the Administrator and State Survey Agency (SSA) and failed to ensure the results of investigations were submitted to the SSA/submitted within five working days of the incident for four (Resident #11, #2, 22, and 34 of 23 reviewed for abuse. Specifically, the failed to report/timely report the following: 1. Resident #41 reported Registered Nurse (RN) #20 physically abused the resident on 09/13/2025. Staff reported the incident to the Director of Nursing (DON); however, the DON failed to report the allegation to the SSA.2. Resident #11 reported that Housekeeper #28 pushed them. The facility failed to report the allegation to the SSA no later than two hours after the allegation was made and failed to report the results of the investigation to the SSA within five…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-10-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure 4 (Residents #41, #11, #33, and #34) of 23 residents reviewed for abuse had thorough investigations completed. Specifically, the facility failed to conduct thorough investigations regarding the following:1. Resident #41 reported Registered Nurse (RN) #20 physically abused the resident on 09/13/2025. Staff reported the incident to the Director of Nursing (DON); however, the DON failed to conduct a thorough investigation and failed to suspend RN #20 placing Resident #41 and additional residents at risk for abuse.2. Resident #11 reported that Housekeeper #28 pushed them. The facility failed to conduct a skin audit or trauma assessment from Resident #11 and failed to obtain a witness statement from Resident #11 and additional residents.3. Resident #33 reported that Resident #22 attempted to touch Resident #33's genitals, and reported that after the resident reported the incident, Resident #22 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon medical record review, facility documentation review and staff interview it was determined that facility staff failed to safely secure a resident during a Hoyer Lift transfer resulting in the resident's subsequent injury and a hospital emergency visit. This was evident for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #50) during the Complaint survey investigation. The findings included: On 2/22/24 at 1:30 PM a review of Resident #50's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 6/9/22 was conducted. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. MDS Section G: Functional Status is coded to reflect that Resident #50 was totally dependent on staff for transfers (how the resident moved between surfaces including to or from the bed, chair, and wheelchair) and required the support of two or more individuals to transfer. Resident # 50 ' s care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility investigation, resident medical records, and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident remained free of verbal abuse. This was evident for 1 (Residents #57) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse.The findings include: On 04/16/2026 at 3:50 PM, a review of facility reported incident # 2726069 was conducted. The review alleged that on 1/15/2026, Staff #40 verbally abused Resident #57. On 04/16/2026 at 3:58 PM, a review of the facility's investigation records indicated that the facility had verified the abuse allegation. The review revealed a witness statement from Staff #21 who heard Staff #40 tell Resident #57, Just come inside, sit down, and shut up. A review of Staff #40 interview statement conducted by the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that the staff had asked the resident to come inside from the smoking area. Resident #57 stated that they did not want to come, and the staff told the resident to shut up and come inside.On 04/16/2026 at 5:00 PM, an interview with Staff #13, Activities Director,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a resident's belongings were secured until the family was able to acquire them. This deficient practice was evidenced in 1 (#239) of 1 record reviewed for misappropriation of property during the recertification survey.The findings include: On 04/15/26 at 1:12 pm the surveyor reviewed the Self Report concerning Resident #239's missing cell phone. The resident transitioned on 03/17/26; when the family went to the facility to pick up the resident's belongings, his/her cell phone was missing. The resident's daughter reported to the Administrator on 03/20/26 at 1:08 pm that the resident's phone was missing. The laundry and the resident's room were searched, and the staff was unable to locate the phone. On 04/15/26 at 1:32 pm a review of a note dated 03/17/26 at 12:16 am indicated the resident passed and the family would come to the facility to collect the resident's belongings. A statement written on 03/19/26 at 7:32 pm by Nurse Supervisor #43 indicated the resident's family went to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, facility nursing staff failed 1.) to provide nursing services that did not meet professional standards by failing to correctly identify a resident (resident # 237) prior to medication administration leading to the resident being administered medication prescribed for another resident (resident #244), and 2.) to adhere to nursing care standards of practice as evidenced by a nurse failed to write a verbal order Glucagon after the medication was administered and 3.) failed to document a resident's ostomy care. This deficient practice was evidenced in 4 (# 237, #244, #234, & #236) of 13 medical records reviewed during the recertification survey. 1.) Surveyor review of a complaint (2797325) on 4/13/26 at 9:00am alleging that a member of the facility's nursing staff erroneously administered medications to resident #237 that were prescribed for the resident's former roommate that had discharged earlier in the day. Review of resident # 237's medical records on 4/13/26 at 9:30am revealed a change in condition progress note dated 3/4/26 at 11:30pm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews it was determined that the facility administered medication to a resident without clinical indication. This was evident for 1 (Resident #54) out of 9 residents reviewed for medication administration. The findings include: On 04/13/2026 at 12:04 PM, a complaint alleged that Resident #54 was administered Gabapentin (anticonvulsant) without clinical indication. On 04/13/2026 at 12:47 PM, record review revealed that Resident #54 did not have an active or discontinued order of Gabapentin. On 04/13/2026 at 12:50 PM, record review revealed that Resident #54 experienced side effects, including dizziness, following the administration. On 04/14/2026 at 9:27 AM, an interview with the Director of Nursing revealed that the medication error occurred and that the Gabapentin was intended for a different resident. On 04/16/2026 at 10:57 AM, the concerns were addressed with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing and they indicated that they understood.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve residents meals based on their menu tickets. This was evident for 2 residents (Resident #137 and #81) out of 4 residents observed during dining.The findings include: On 04/16/2026 at 1:03 PM, the surveyor observed the meal tray for Resident #137. Meal ticket indicated that the resident was to be served 8 oz of whole milk, however this resident's meal tray did not have milk. On 04/16/2026 at 1:04 PM, a brief interview was conducted with Resident #137. They reported that they did not like the facility's food, and that they looked forward to having milk, because it was the only thing they liked during mealtimes. Resident #137 added that they were not served milk today. Staff #5, Regional Food Service Director, was present during this interview, and confirmed that the resident was not served milk. On 04/16/2026 at 1:08 PM, surveyor and Staff #5, made another observation. Resident #81's meal ticket indicated that the resident should have been served pasta for lunch, however, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-17 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, facility policy review, and interview, the facility failed to address Resident Council concerns regarding staffing and call lights for 9 of 9 months reviewed. Specifically, the Resident Council expressed repeated concerns related to call light response times and staffing, but at the time of the survey, the issues were still ongoing, indicating the facility had not sufficiently addressed them. Findings included:During an interview on 10/17/2025 at 1:21 PM, the Regional Director of Operations (RDO) stated there was no Resident Council policy. The facility's policy regarding the grievance process applied to Resident Council concerns. A facility policy titled, Grievance and Complaint Procedure, dated 01/2022, indicated, The administrator and staff will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances to the satisfaction of the resident and/or complainant. The section Policy Interpretation and Implementation specified, 6. Upon receipt of a grievance or complaint, the facility administrator or designee will review and investigate the allegation and compile documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt and consistent efforts were made to resolve grievances. Specifically, the facility failed to:- thoroughly investigate a grievance related to failure to provide incontinence care and inform the resident and family member who filed the grievance of the facility's efforts to resolve the grievance for 1 (Resident #47) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for grievances.- effectively and on an ongoing basis, address and make reasonable effort to follow up on and resolve repeated grievances and concerns related to staff response to call bells, as submitted by multiple residents and by the Resident Council over the past 9 of 9 months reviewed. Findings included:A facility policy titled, Grievance and Complaint Procedure, dated 01/2022, indicated, The administrator and staff will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances to the satisfaction of resident and/or complainant. The policy also specified, 6. Upon receipt of a grievance or complaint, the facility administrator or designee will review and investigate the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-10-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement its abuse prohibition and prevention policies for 9 (Residents #6, #11, #14, #18, #22, #24, #30, #34, and #35) of 21 residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse/neglect/injuries of unknown origin to local law enforcement and/or the ombudsman and failed to follow the facility's policy related to conducting and documenting thorough investigations of allegations. Findings included:A facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation – Reporting and Investigating, dated 09/2022, indicated, 2. The administrator or the individual making the allegation immediately reports his or her suspicion to the following persons or agencies: a. The state licensing/certification agency responsible for surveying/licensing the facility; b. The local/state ombudsman; c. The resident's representative; d. Adult protective services (where state law provides jurisdiction in long-term care); e. Law enforcement officials; f. The resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff consistently and correctly implemented infection control practices. Specifically, the facility failed to:- ensure enhanced barrier precautions were followed during wound care for 1 (Resident #28) of 2 residents observed during wound care.- ensure catheter care and hand hygiene were performed in accordance with professional standards of practice and facility policy for 2 (Resident #44 and Resident #45) of 2 residents observed during catheter care. Findings included:1. A facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised 12/2024, indicated, Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) are utilized to prevent the spread of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents. The policy further indicated, Enhanced barrier precautions apply when: a. A resident is infected or colonized with a CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]-targeted MDRO, but does not have a wound or indwelling medical device, and does not have secretions or excretions that cannot be covered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 3 (Residents #47, #30, and #48) of 3 residents reviewed for dignity were treated with dignity and respect. Specifically, facility staff failed to promptly assist Resident #47 with incontinence care, which resulted in the resident attending church services in a soiled brief. Additionally, a staff member failed to knock or announce herself prior to entering the shared room of Resident #30 and Resident #48). Findings included: A facility policy titled Dignity, revised 02/2021, indicated Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. The policy also specified, 12. Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity are prohibited. Staff are expected to promote dignity and assist resident for example: b. promptly responding to a resident's request for toileting assistance. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #47 on 03/16/2025. According to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 81 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect Resident #16's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident (Resident #49). This affected 1 (Resident #16) of 23 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings included:A facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, revised 04/2021, revealed, Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. A facility policy titled, Identifying Types of Abuse, revised 09/2022, revealed, 1. Abuse of any kind against residents is strictly prohibited. 2. Abuse prevention includes recognizing and understanding the definitions and types of abuse that can occur. The policy specified, 4. 'Abuse' is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-17 · tag F0826 — isolatedProvide specialized rehabilitative services by qualified personnel, when ordered for a resident by a doctor.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure therapy services were provided in accordance with physician orders for 1 (Resident #31) of 4 residents sampled for therapy services. Findings included:A facility policy titled, Physician Orders, updated 01/2025, revealed, 5. The provision of care and services in accordance with the physician orders will be documented in accordance with professional standards of practice. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #31 on 03/10/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side and muscle wasting and atrophy. The admission Record revealed Resident #31 was discharged home on [DATE]. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/16/2025, revealed Resident #31 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for 3 (Residents #32, #31, and #30) of 48 sampled residents. Findings included:A facility policy titled, Guidelines for Charting and Documentation, revised in 04/2012, revealed, The purpose of charting and documentation is to provide: 1. A complete account of the resident's care, treatment, response to the care, signs, symptoms, etc.[et cetera, and so forth], and the progress of the resident's care; 2. Guidance to the physician in prescribing appropriate medications and treatments; 3. The facility, as well as other interested parties, with a tool for measuring the quality of care provided to the resident; 4. Nursing service personnel with a record of the physical and mental status of the resident; 5. Assistance in development of a Plan of Care for each resident; 6. A legal record that protects the resident, care providers, and the facility; and 7. A source of al resident charges.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3) On 1/17/2025 at approximately 9:25 AM, the Surveyor observed the Medication room at nursing station #1. There were 2 small black refrigerators sitting one on top of the other in the medication room. The inside of the bottom refrigerator door and interior shelves were dirty, covered with multiple areas of brown dried food stains and sticky cream-colored stains. The Surveyor observed a clear cup of cream-colored pudding covered with plastic wrap and labeled 1/11. 4) On 1/17/2025 at approximately 9:50 AM, the Surveyor observed the Clean Utility room. There was a Standard size refrigerator located in the corner of the room. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #5 informed the Surveyor that was where resident stored personal foods. The Surveyor observed a January 2025 temperature log with no freezer or refrigerator temperature documentation. Inside the refrigerator, on the top shelf, there was an opened and unlabeled 8 oz pack of [NAME] bologna, 32 oz Wawa hazelnut non-dairy creamer, 64 oz Thick It Clear Advantage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity was maintained for residents. This was found to be evident for 6 (Resident #210, #130, #56, #91, #152, and #179) ) of 7 residents reviewed for dignity during the survey. Findings include: 1) On 1/15/25 at 5:45 PM while touring the units, a family member who was visiting with Resident #210 requested assistance of staff to transfer the resident to bed. A nurse who was on the unit summoned a GNA (#48) to the resident room. Approximately five minutes later another GNA # 54 and the assigned GNA (# 55) arrived to assist. GNA #48 brought the Hoyer lift to the resident room and the other 2 GNA's placed the apron drape underneath the resident. The resident agreed to allow the surveyors to observe the transfer. At this time, the three GNA's attached the apron drape that was underneath the resident to the lift and proceeded to lift the resident. They were unable to lift the resident as the battery was not working on the hoyer. GNA #48 removed the battery and went to get…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to verify each resident on Unit 4 had their call bells readily available if assistance were needed and ensure a resident's needs were accommodated by scheduling a follow-up appointment in a timely manner. This was evident for 4 (Resident #119, #179, #210, and # 178) out of 5 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs during the survey. The findings include: 1. During observation rounds on 01/13/25 at 8:07 am the surveyor observed Resident #119 call bell on the floor. At 8:16 am while in Resident #179's room, the surveyor asked Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #31 where was the resident's call bell. GNA #31 verbalized the resident was unable to use their right arm and had minimal use of their left arm. GNA #31 proceeded to remove the call bell from behind the bed and place the call bell near the resident's left hand. While walking down the hall on Unit #4 on 01/13/25 at 8:38 am the surveyor entered room [ROOM NUMBER].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interviews and record review, it was determined the facility failed to act promptly upon the recommendations of the resident council concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility. This was evident for 4 of 4 months of resident council meeting minutes reviewed. The findings include: On 1/15/25 at 2:15pm, an interview with 10 residents, including members of the resident council, was conducted. The residents voiced numerous concerns, many of which had also been identified by the surveyors. During an interview with the Life Enrichment Director (Staff #8) on 1/15/25 at 4:30 pm, copies of resident council minutes for November 2024, December 2024 and January 2025 were obtained. Minutes were requested for October 2024 but were not provided to the surveyor. Staff #8 stated that she sends council minutes and concerns to administration by using a Department Response Form. On 1/16/25 at 10:26 am during review of the Resident Council minutes provided by the facility, it was revealed that 20 issues were identified by the Resident Council in November 2024.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record reviews and interviews, it was determined that facility staff failed to assess the resident for an advance directive and did not offer assistance with creating an advance directive. This deficient practice was evident for 6 (#98, #76, #133 #185, #107, #547) out of 6 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: Advance directive is a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law (whether statutory or as recognized by the courts of the State), relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated. On 1/13/25 at 10:57 AM, a review of Resident #98, #76, #133, #185, #107, #547's medical records revealed no evidence that the residents or their representatives were assessed for an advance directive, informed of their rights to have and advance directive, or provided with written material regarding an advance directive. On 1/13/25 and 01/14/25 the surveyor requested documentation from the Administrator #1 indicating that Resident #98, #76, #133, #185, #107,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate lighting, housekeeping and maintenance services to keep the residents' environment clean and in good repair. This was evident in 3 of 4 unit units observed during tours of the facility and resident rooms during the survey. The findings include: 1) During observation rounds on 01/13/25 at 7:50 am the surveyor entered the shower room located across from room [ROOM NUMBER], on the right side of the room in the corner was a white shower chair. Beneath the shower chair was a large amount of dried dark brown stool on the floor. Certified Nursing Assistant #29 confirmed the surveyor's findings and verbalized the shower room was used by the staff daily. 2) On 01/13/25 at 8:02 am the surveyor observed a cotton tipped swab on the left side of the commode in bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The cotton tipped swab remained in the same location when observed again by the surveyor later in the in the afternoon. On 01/15/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and resident interviews conducted during the resident council meeting, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the residents have the right to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal and failed to promptly assist a resident in filing a grievance of missing personal property. This deficient practice was evident for 1 (#76) out of 1 resident reviewed during the annual survey. The findings included: 1) On 01/13/25 at 12:04 PM, during an interview with Resident #76, who was admitted [DATE], and their family member, they stated that the resident's jacket had gone missing during the week of Christmas. They reported the incident to a facility staff, but no one had followed up regarding the matter. On 01/14/25 at 03:15 PM, a review of Resident #76's personal property inventory record for December 2024 revealed that no personal property inventory had been completed. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan regarding activity needs for residents, a resident with weight loss and a resident with communication deficit. This was evident for 3 (#150, 116 & #179) of 5 residents reviewed for careplans during the survey. The findings include: 1. On 01/13/25 at 8:15 AM, Resident #150 was interviewed. During the interview, Resident #150 pointed out and stated to the surveyor that he/she had an August 2024, activities calendar posted on his/her room wall; therefore, he/she does not know what daily activities are being held at the facility. Also, Resident #150 did not have a Main Events calendar posted on his/her room wall; therefore, he/she was not aware of the facility's special events. On 01/15/25 at 8:34 AM, Resident #150's medical record was reviewed. The medical record review revealed that Resident #150's care plan stated that he/she should be provided with a monthly activity calendar and should be invited to special…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing care within professional standards of practice. This was found to be evident for 5 (Resident #178, #297, #447, #150, and #158) out of 74 residents reviewed during the annual and complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 1/15/2025 at 8:54 AM, during a review of Resident #178's electronic medical record, the Surveyor discovered that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after being hospitalized . Further review revealed a Discharge Summary from the hospital which included orders to follow up with Orthopedic Surgery Service in two weeks. The Surveyor also identified a physician's order dated 12/04/2024 for an Ortho follow up. During an interview conducted with the Director of Nursing on 1/15/2025 at 11:40AM, the Surveyor asked the DON to provide documentation verifying Resident #178's scheduled orthopedic appointment, transportation arrangements, and contact with the family…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were implemented and completed, ensure a residents' weight was monitored and ensure professional standards of nursing practice were followed when administering medications to residents. This practice was noted for 7 ( Resident #178, #297 #150, #116, #193, #188, #107) out of 74 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1) A percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube is a feeding tube that is surgically inserted into the stomach through the abdomen. It allows a person to receive nutrition, fluids, and medicine when they can't consume enough through their mouth. On 1/15/2025 at 9:00 AM, a review of Resident #178's electronic medical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a PEG tube in place. Further review failed to reveal any physician's order for PEG tube management at the facility. On 1/15/2025 at 11:48 AM, an interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-17 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — patternEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility leadership staff failed to ensure certified nursing assistants completed a state approved geriatric nursing assistant training program within four months of employment. This deficient practice was evident in 7 (#29, #61, #73, #74, #75, #76, #77) actively employed certified nursing assistants. The findings include: On [DATE] at 4:30 pm a review of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #29's employee record revealed the CNA completed their CNA training on [DATE]. Their CNA certificate was issued by the Maryland Board of Nursing on [DATE]. According to the employee's record the CNA had been working at the facility past the four-month allotted timeframe to obtain their Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) certification. On [DATE] at 8:38 am Administrator #1 verbalized the Nurse Aide Candidate Handbook the facility used under the [former owner's] policy indicated CNA's had 12 months to obtain a GNA certification. They were not aware of the four-month…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the pharmacist reports irregularities to the attending physician (Resident #133), and ensure that the Medication Regimen Review (MMR) of Residents #107 and # 150 was conducted at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist. This was evident for 3 of 7 residents reviewed. The findings include: Medication Regimen Review (MRR) or Drug Regimen Review (DRR), is a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication. The MRR includes a review of the medical record in order to prevent, identify, report, and resolve medication-related problems, medication errors, or other irregularities. 1. A review of the medical record conducted on 1/15/25 at 10:58 pm for Resident #133, revealed a physician order from 8/26/23 for Phenobarbital 32.4 mg read as follows: Phenobarbital 32.4 tablet by mouth one time a day for seizures. The mg is missing from the order and could result…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were served meals according to their menu ticket. This was evident for 6 (Resident #136, #97, #176, #600, #193, #83, #599) of 6 residents randomly observed during meals, and 1 of 1 meal tray line observed during the survey. The findings include: 1a) On 01/14/25 at 09:13 AM, the surveyor randomly observed Resident #136 in her/his room eating breakfast. The surveyor observed Resident #136's meal ticket which indicated extra gravy or sauce on the side, hot cereal, orange juice, and coffee or hot tea. Resident #136's meal tray failed to include extra gravy or sauce on the side, hot cereal, orange juice, and coffee or hot tea. On 01/14/25 at 09:14 AM, an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA, Staff #29), who was in the room at the time of the observation revealed that she agreed that the listed items above were not on the resident's tray. CNA #29 also indicated that the kitchen did not have any orange juice and that by the time she passes out the trays to all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview and surveyor observation it was determined the facility failed to provide palatable food with an appetizing temperature. This was evident for 1 out of 1 observation of a kitchen tray line and test tray. The findings include: On 01/15/25 at 11:23 AM, the surveyor observed the start of the lunch tray line in the kitchen. Staff were placing plates with food onto hot plates which were then placed into the tray carts for unit delivery. Hot plates are used to keep prepared food warm by serving it on a heated plate, ensuring that the meal stays at an appealing serving temperature for residents, especially those who may take longer to eat, preventing the food from cooling down too quickly when served on a cold plate. On 01/15/25 at 01:02 PM, Director of Operations (Staff #58) indicated that they had run out of hot plates at the time during the tray line. There were approximately 16 resident plates left to be made and sent to the unit. Staff #58 continued to place the following 16 plates on trays without a hot plate underneath onto the cart for unit delivery. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-17 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on an interview with resident council members, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that suitable, nourishing alternative meals and snacks were provided to residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal service times, consistent with the resident plan of care. This was evident for 10 out of 10 residents present at the resident council meeting with the surveyor. The findings includes: On 1/15/25 at 2:15pm, a meeting with 10 residents for the resident council interview was held in the main dining hall. At this time, numerous resident complaints were voiced. All residents in attendance agreed that often there are no snacks at bedtime. The residents stated that bedtime snacks are brought to the unit not labeled and often not delivered to the rooms, there is typically only one choice of snack and no consideration of personal preferences. One resident stated they required special dietary considerations and that those considerations were never met by the evening snacks. Review of the resident council minutes on 1/15/25 at 3:30 pm for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-17 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based facility record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide documentation indicating that facility staff members received screening, education, offering, of the current COVID-19 vaccination. This was evident for 5 staff members (Geriatric Nursing Assistants #64, 65, 66, 67 and 68) out of 5 staff members reviewed during the survey. The findings include: On 01/17/25 at 1:17 PM, Geriatric Nursing Assistant's #64, #65, #66, #67 and #68 facility records were reviewed. The facility record review revealed that Geriatric Nursing Assistants #64, #65, #66, #67 and #68 did not have documentation in their personnel records indicating that they received screening, education, offering, of the current COVID-19 vaccination. On 01/17/25 at 1:44 PM, the Infection Preventionist staff #4 was interviewed. During the interview, the Infection Preventionist staff #4 stated that he/she did not have documentation indicating that the 5 Geriatric Nursing Assistants received screening, education, offering, and current COVID-19 vaccination.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-17 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — patternRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to conduct regular inspection of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails to identify areas of possible entrapment. This was evident for 5 (Resident #48, #107, #160, #167, and #188) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents. The findings include: Bedrails or side rails are adjustable bars that attach to the bed. They vary in size, including full, half, and quarter lengths depending on their intended purpose. They can be used to prevent falls, help assist residents with movement, and provide a feeling of security. Bed rails also have potential risks associated with them. 1) On 01/13/25 at 11:59 AM, during the initial phase of the survey, the surveyor observed Resident #48 in bed with two 1/4 bed rails up on either side of the top end of the bed. 2) On 01/13/25 at 8:44 AM, during the initial phase of the survey, the surveyor observed Resident #107 in bed with two 1/4 bed rails up on either side of the top end of the bed. 3) On 01/13/25 at 8:44 AM, during the initial phase of the survey, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to keep a sanitary environment. This was evident for 3 of 4 units observed. The findings include: 1. On 01/13/25 at 07:48 AM, an observation of Unit 2 & 3 revealed linen on the floor outside of the bathroom next to room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 01/13/25 at 11:20 AM, an observation of Unit 2 & 3 revealed linen on the floor beside the dresser in Resident #56's room. On 01/15/25 at 12:32 PM, an observation in Resident #116's room revealed the resident's clothing and linen on the floor. The Director of Nursing (DON, Staff #2) confirmed the surveyor's observation. On 01/15/25 at 02:35 PM, an interview with Unit 2 & 3 Manager (Staff #30) revealed that the expectation is for staff to place soiled/dirty linen in resident room linen carts or the linen room upon completion of care or when identified. 2. On 01/13/25 at 08:37 AM, the surveyor observed a large vertical, rectangle- like area of missing wall paper on the unit 2 hallway across from room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff and family, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident's responsible party (RP) when residents were had a change in condition/medical care. This was evident during a random observation for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #176 and #133) reviewed for notification during the survey. The findings include: 1. During observation rounds on 1/15/24 at 6:15pm while standing in the hallway near resident #210's room. Resident #176 family member began questioning the nurse staff # 85 on the medication cart as to where Resident #176 was located since s/he was not in the room. The nurse staff # 85 stated to the family member I know where the resident is. Who are you? The family member stated I am one the residents' responsible parties. Staff #85 stated the resident was transferred to the hospital for complaints of chest pain. The family member replied I was never notified. Why? The nurse stated, I don't know why. The nurse may have called the other contact person. The family member contacted the other family member…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on administrative review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to prevent a resident from experiencing verbal abuse by an employee. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident # 24) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse during the survey. Findings include: Intake MD00205342 was reviewed on 1/17/25 at 11:00 AM for allegations of abuse. According to the facility's investigation, GNA (Staff #56) was overheard by a Nurse (RN # 57) stating that she would hurt Resident # 24. Review on 1/17/25 of a written witness statement by the RN (#57) dated 5/3/24, revealed that while she was sitting at the nurse station, a GNA (#56) went to move Resident # 24 out of the way and the resident became verbally and physically aggressive. The Nurse heard the GNA say, Imma [sic] leave you alone because I know what you are and your mental isn't right, because other than that I would [expletive] you up. Further review of a signed written statement by the GNA (#56) revealed that she said the following to Resident # 24; Today is not my day, I would beat you up because…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interviews and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to protect the residents from misappropriation of personal property and investigate resident's report of missing personal property. This was evident for 2 (resident #38 and #76) out of 4 residents reviewed during survey. The findings include: 1) On 01/13/25 at 11:26 AM, Resident #38 was interviewed. During the interview, Resident #38 stated that some of his/her clothing was missing after being laundered by the facility. On 01/13/25 at 12:45 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator staff #1 was interviewed. During the interview, he/she was made aware of Resident #38's grievance regarding his/her laundry missing. After surveyor intervention, the Nursing Home Administrator staff #1 stated that a Grievance Summaries would be completed. On 01/15/25 at 10:21 AM, Environmental Director staff #15 was interviewed. During the interview, Environmental Director staff #15 stated that he/she was not aware of the missing items and did not receive a Grievance Summaries regarding Resident #38's missing clothing.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility reported incidents and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin in a timely manner to the state agency. This was found to be evident for 1(Resident #154) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse during the survey. The Findings include: During review of the facility reported incident MD00205829 on 1/17/25 at 8:58 am, it was found that an injury of unknown origin was reported to LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) #14 by Resident #154 on 5/18/24 at 4:20pm. The Self Report Form from the facility was submitted to the State Agency on 5/19/24 with no time indicated by the DON (Director of Nursing). The report was received by the State Agency on 5/20/24 at 12:34pm. During an interview with the DON and the Administrator on 1/17/25 at 10:30 am, both were unable to indicate why the alleged incident and injury of unknown origin was not reported within the 2 hour requirement.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, facility investigation report review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to retain documentation related to the delayed reporting of a resident fall. This was evident for 1 out of 4 (#124) residents reviewed for falls during the survey. The findings include: On 01.15.25 the surveyor reviewed the facility report related to Resident # 124 that was submitted to OHCQ on 06.23.24. On 06.03.24 the resident complained of pain to the right hip and leg. The resident was treated for the pain, the medical director, nurse practitioner, and the resident representative were notified as well on 06.3.2024. On 06.03.24 resident #124 was admitted to the hospital and found to have a fracture of the right femur. The surveyor's review of the final facility reported submitted by the facility revealed the resident had fallen on 06.01.24, the LPN #24 did not document the completion of the assessment of Resident #124 or document that the fall had occurred at 10 PM on 06.01.24. The DON failed to retain documentation that the LPN #24 failed to report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to code a resident's status accurately on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This was evident for 1 (Resident #188) of 40 sampled residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments must be accurate to ensure that each Resident receives the care they need. The Assessment Reference Date (ARD) is the specific end point of look-back periods of resident status for the MDS assessment process. On 01/13/25 at 2:52 PM, review of Resident #188's medical record revealed a progress note titled Wound Care Progress Note dated 1/3/25 which indicated the resident had a Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) on her/his sacrum. A Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) is a type of pressure sore where the tissue underneath the skin is severely damaged by pressure. The sacrum consists of the bottom or base…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to have a care plan meeting with the interdisciplinary care team and failed to provide residents with a quarterly care plan meeting prepared and revised by the entire interdisciplinary team after the quarterly review assessment. This deficient practice was evidenced in 2 ( Resident #116 and Resident #150) of two records reviewed for care plan meetings during the survey. The findings include: 1. On 01/13/25 at 4:18 pm during an interview with Resident #116 the surveyor asked if they were participating in care plan meetings. The resident did not recall having care plan meetings. On 01/15/25 at 8:35 am a review of the resident's electronic medical record revealed there was no documentation to verify the resident had a multidisciplinary care plan meeting prior to 12/24/24. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was documentation of a navigation guide meeting on 11/01/24. There was no documentation to verify the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and observations it was determined that the facility failed to offer alternative equipment for a resident whose electric wheelchair was broken in order to maintain the resident's mobility and opportunities to be out of bed and failed to provide basic activities of daily needs to a resident. This was evident for 2 (Resident #130 and # 116 ) out of 4 residents reviewed for activities of daily living during the survey. The findings include: 1. Resident #130 was diagnosed as a C5-C-7 quadriplegic as a result of a Motor Vehicle Accident several years ago who has limited mobility of his/her hands. On 01.13.25 at 09:20 AM the surveyor returned to resident #130's room. The resident stated that staffing was not sufficient. The resident stated that he/she had to ask for assistance and may wait a long time for the staff to return to his/her room. Also, the resident stated that he/she had not been out of bed for six months and that he's/her wheelchair had not been repaired for over six months. The resident also stated that he/she would prefer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, observations, administrative records reviews,and medical record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to document that a dependent resident consistently received activities of daily care such as showering and bathing or assistance with meals. This was evident for 1 out of 4 residents (#130) reviewed during the survey. The findings include: Resident #130 was diagnosed as a C5-C-7 quadriplegic as a result of a Motor Vehicle Accident several years ago who had limited mobility of his hands. On 01.13.25 at 09:05 AM during an observation tour of the clinical unit 8, the surveyor observed resident #130 in bed with a foley catheter, no foley bag cover was present. The resident had an over the bed table in front him/her with both his/her hands on the table. The surveyor observed that the there was a dirty hand splint lying on the table in front of the resident's hand. While the surveyor was speaking with the resident, GNA #53 entered the resident's room with a breakfast tray. GNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure that one-on-one activities were provided for a resident. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #24) of 3 residents reviewed for activities during the facility's survey. Findings include: An observation was made on 1/13/25 at 1:01 PM and resident # 24 was lying in bed asleep. No activities were observed. Observation on 1/15/25 at 9:00 AM resident # 24 was observed sitting up in the bed with his/her legs noted to the side of the bed. No activities observed. While remaining on the unit from 9:00 AM-9:40 AM on the same date, the resident remained in the room when observed multiple times, sitting with legs to the side of the bed. No activity staff were observed entering the resident room and no one-one activities were observed. During an interview with the Life Enrichment Director (LED), Staff # 8 on 1/15/25 at 10:45 AM, she stated that anyone that does not come out for activities and is determined not to be active on their own, in their room will receive one-one activities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility staff failed to use appropriate safety measures while transferring a resident with a Hoyer lift and keep a resident environment safe. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident # 210 and # 154) of 6 residents reviewed for accidents during the survey. Findings include: 1. On 1/15/25 at 5:45 PM while touring the units, a family member who was visiting with resident # 210 requested assistance of staff to transfer the resident to bed. A nurse who was on the unit summoned a GNA (#48) to the resident room. Approximately five minutes later another GNA #54 and the assigned GNA (#55) arrived to assist. GNA #48 brought the Hoyer lift to the resident room and the other 2 GNA's placed the apron drape underneath the resident. The resident agreed to allow the surveyors to observe the transfer. At this time, the three GNA's attached the apron drape that was underneath the resident to the lift and proceeded to lift the resident. They were unable to lift the resident as the battery was not working. GNA # 48…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that facility staff failed to monitor and address the nutritional needs of a resident who had a known significant weight loss. This deficient practice was evident for 1 (#107) of 1 resident reviewed during the survey. The findings include: On 01/13/2025 at 3:11PM, during a review of Resident #107's medical records, the surveyor identified that the resident's weight on 12/8/24, was 194 lbs, and on 1/6/25, it had decreased to 175 lbs, reflecting a weight loss of 9.79%. Review of Resident #107's treatment record for September 2024 to December 2024 revealed an order for monthly weights. On 12/08/24 a new order was written for Resident #107 to be weighed weekly, times four weeks, then monthly starting 12/08/24. There was no documentation to verify Resident #107 was weighed weekly. On 1/15/25 at 2:04 PM, a review of the Registered Dietician (RD) #21 progress notes for 11/13/2024, regarding weight changes reveals that Resident #107 weight had decreased by 20.6 lbs (9.3%) over the past two months. A review of the RD #21…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain informed consent prior to the initiation of bed rails. This was evident for 5 (Resident #48, #107, #160, #167, and #188) of 5 residents reviewed for physical restraints. The findings include: Bedrails or side rails are adjustable bars that attach to the bed. They vary in size, including full, half, and quarter lengths depending on their intended purpose. They can be used to prevent falls, help assist residents with movement, and provide a feeling of security. Bed rails also have potential risks associated with them. The facility should obtain a signed consent form before the use of bedrails. 1) On 01/13/25 at 11:59 AM, during the initial phase of the survey, the surveyor observed Resident #48 in bed with two 1/4 bed rails up on either side of the top end of the bed. On 01/16/25 at 11:00 AM, review of the document provided titled MQS: Admission/readmission Evaluation Packet Section 2: Bed Rail Evaluation for Resident #48 failed to reveal alternatives attempted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that the physician provided supervision of a resident with significant weight loss. This deficient practice was evident for 1 (#107) resident reviewed during the survey. The findings include: On 01/13/2025 at 3:11PM, during a review of Resident #107's medical records, the surveyor identified that the resident's weight on 9/17/2024, was 215.6 lbs, and on 1/12/25, it had dropped to 175 lbs. Further review of residents weight on 01/15/24 revealed a weight of 165 lbs. A review of the RD #21 progress notes for 1/13/2025, regarding weight changes reveals that Resident #107's weight had decreased by 19 lbs over the past month. No interventions were ordered until 1/13/25. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) #2 on 1/15/25 at 4:21 PM, the surveyor asked why Resident #107's medical provider was not informed of the significant weight loss, the DON #2 was not able to provide an explanation why notification was not done. On 01/16/25 at 3:33 PM, the surveyor reviewed progress notes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure adequate nursing staff to properly monitor residents. This deficient practice was evident for 1 (#133) out of 1 resident reviewed during the survey. The findings include: On 1/13/24 at 5:38 PM, review of complaint MD00204568 dated 4/2024 revealed, Resident #133 family member alleged the resident was being neglected by staff due to staffing issues. On 1/14/25 at 4:19 PM, during an interview with Resident #133's family member, they report concerns about multiple falls Resident #133 had on station 7. The family member also mentioned that on 7/28/24 at 11:49 AM, they received a voicemail message regarding another fall the resident had. When they returned the call and asked the nurse who was working on station 7, the nurse replied that no nurse was working on unit 7. On 01/15/25 at 8:41 AM, during an interview with geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) #19, they explained that stations 1, 2, 3, and 7 generally have one nurse assigned, while stations 4 and 8 have two nurses. GNA #19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to post the required staffing data on the whiteboard and/or on the daily staffing board. The facility also failed to post the daily staffing schedule in a prominent place, readily accessible visually to visitors and residents. This was evident on three out of three nursing units. The findings include: On 01.13.25 at 08:45 AM the surveyor observed that on unit 7 the census board reflected the staffing assignment for Sunday, 01.12.25. Also, on unit 7 the daily staffing schedule was lying on the top of the counter and was not visible for visitors or residents. Additionally, at approximately 09:00 AM on unit 8 the daily staffing schedule was not posted so that visitors and residents could easily visualize the information. On 01.14.25 at 08:39 AM while performing an observation tour on Unit 2 and 3 surveyor observed the assignment board did not have written information regarding which clinical staff were assigned to each resident. There was no assignment sheet displayed that informed the residents or visitors…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an account of all controlled drugs was complete and accurate and failed to provide the correct dosage of medication for a resident. This was found to be evident for 2 out of 2 narcotic lock boxes located in the narcotic medication carts and for 1 (Resident # 158) of 3 medication administration records reviewed for accuracy during the facility's survey. The findings include: Controlled Drugs are substances that have an accepted medical use, have the potential for abuse, ranging from low to high, and may also lead to physical or psychological dependence. 1. On 1/17/2025 at 8:45 AM, during an interview conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #5, the Surveyor was informed that narcotic counts for controlled drugs must be done by the incoming nurse and the outgoing nurse at change of shift. The nurses would verify the controlled drug count was accurate and sign the count on the Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition (CDRRD) form in the narcotic count binder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a psychotropic medication prescribed as needed (PRN), had an end date that was limited to 14 days. This was evident for 1 (Resident #59) of 5 residents reviewed for medications. The findings include: On 01/16/25 at 09:10 AM, record review of Resident #59's active orders revealed an order for hydrOXYzine HCI Oral Tablet 25 MG, give 25mg by mouth every 24 hours as needed for anxiety/itching/restlessness with a start date of 01/09/2025 and an end date of 02/08/2025. Hydroxyzine is used to help control anxiety and tension caused by nervous and emotional conditions. On 01/16/25 10:35 AM, review of the facility policy labeled Psychotropic Medication Use revealed that, PRN orders for psychotropic medications are limited to 14 days. On 01/16/25 at 11:26 AM, an interview with the Director of Nursing (Staff #2) revealed that the facility was supposed to avoid using psychotropic medications PRN (as needed). She further indicated if a psychotropic medication is ordered PRN, that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all medications and biologicals were stored and labeled properly. This was evident for 3 out of 3 medication carts reviewed during the medication storage facility task completed during the survey. The findings include: Controlled Medications are substances that have an accepted medical use, have the potential for abuse, ranging from low to high, and may also lead to physical or psychological dependence. On 1/17/2025 at 8:30 AM, during an observation of a medication cart across from nurses' station #1, the Surveyor identified house stock medication bottles of Melatonin 10 mg, Melatonin 5 mg, Melatonin 3 mg, Aspirin chewable 81 mg, acetaminophen 325 mg, and Vitamin D 25 mcg which were all opened and not labeled with the date the bottle was opened. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #5 was made aware of the Surveyors findings and stated she would discard the medication according to the facility policy. LPN #5 informed the Surveyor that once a new house stock medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the facility's kitchen had an eating assistive device for a resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #23) of 223 resident meal tickets observed during the kitchen meal tray line. The findings include: On 01/15/25 at 11:45 AM, during the lunch tray line observation, Director of Operations (Staff #58) indicated that they did not have the scoop plate that was indicated on the meal ticket for Resident #23. A scoop plate is an assistive device that helps people eat independently by making it easier to push food onto a spoon or fork because of curved rim features. On 01/15/25 at 11:45 AM, an interview with Staff #58 revealed that physical therapy would have to order more because the kitchen had no scoop plates. On 01/15/25 at 11:46 AM, an observation during the same tray line revealed Resident #23's food prepared on a regular plate.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents' records are accurate, complete and protected. This was found to be evident for 3 (Resident # 41 and # 105) of 40 sampled residents reviewed during the facility's survey. Findings include: 1. Review of resident # 41's medical record on 1/14/25 at 11:45 AM revealed the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) form that was completed on 11/10/22 did not have section (A)- Exempted Hospital Discharge filled out. The rest of the form was completed. 2. Review of resident # 105's medical record on 1/14/25 at 11:20 AM revealed the PASARR form that was completed on 11/18/21 did not have section (A)- Exempted Hospital Discharge filled out. The rest of the form was completed. An interview was conducted with the Director of Social Services staff # 13 on 1/15/25 at 1:50 PM and she was asked to review the PASARR form for the resident that did not have the top part completed. She stated that the first section (A)- Exempted Hospital Discharge is supposed to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility documentation and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure that the Quality Assurance Committee met on a quarterly basis for the past year. This was found to be evident during the facility's survey. Findings include: On 1/17/25 at 2:00 PM the survey team requested documentation of the facility's Quality Assurance attendance sheets for January 2024 through December 2024. The documents provided by the facility consisted of information dated July 2024 through November 2024. At that time an interview was conducted with the Administrator (Staff#1) who stated that she was the designated person for the Quality Assurance Program. She stated that the facility obtained new ownership effective June 26, 2024. She went on to say that the current owners did not maintain documentation of the previous attendance sheets at the time of obtaining ownership and could not provide the attendance sheets for January 2024, February 2024, March 20024, April 2024, and May 2024. She was made aware that the facility is responsible for maintaining all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. On 01/13/25 at 8:12 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse staff #9 was interviewed. During the interview, Licensed Practical Nurse staff #9 stated that Resident #447 was on droplet precautions for respiratory syncytial virus. Also, Licensed Practical Nurse staff #9 stated that the facility's policy and procedure is that residents diagnosed with respiratory syncytial virus should have droplet precaution signage on the outside of his/her room door. During observation rounds on 01/13/25 at 8:23 AM, Resident #447's room was found to not have droplet precaution signage posted on the outside of his/her room. On 01/17/25 at 11:28 AM, Resident's #447's medical record was reviewed. The medical record review revealed that Resident #447 was diagnosed with respiratory syncytial virus on 1/9/25. Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain infection control practices and provide the appropriate signage outside the resident's room indicating the use of specific personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to provide maintenance and housekeeping services to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for residents. This was evident for 5 of 8 nursing units observed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Based on multiple complaints of the facility's environment, the Surveyor began an environmental tour on 2/21/24 at 7:45 AM. The Unit Manger (Staff #12) and Surveyor on 2/21/24 at 7:55 AM observed the following: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER]'s shared bathroom: an unmarked and uncovered bed pan and basin on the floor, and unmarked and uncovered basin on the sink, laminate missing from the front panel of sink cabinet exposing plywood. 2. room [ROOM NUMBER]B's dresser (not in reach of the Resident #47 who is bed ridden) contained food in a plastic dish. Resident #47 was asked how old the food was and the Resident stated he/she did not know. 3. Outside room [ROOM NUMBER] on the floor was an oxygen concentrator, oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility reported incident investigations and interview, it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate injuries of unknown origin and allegations of abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of resident property. This was evident for 6 (#7, #32, #38, #45, #53, #55) of 28 facility reported incidents reviewed during a complaint survey The findings include: 1. On 2/23/24 a review of facility reported incident MD00199622 was conducted and revealed on 11/15/23 Resident #7 was assessed and sent to the emergency room for left shoulder dislocation. The Surveyor asked the Director of Nursing (DON) on 2/27/24 at 8:55 AM for the investigation of the incident. At that time the DON stated she has not been able to find the investigation and has no statements from the facility staff that worked with the Resident during the time of the injury. Interview with the DON on 2/27/24 at 11:10 AM confirmed the facility does not have the investigation of Resident #7's injury on 11/15/23. 2. On 2/15/24 a review of facility reported incident MD00184931 was conducted and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to have quarterly care plan meetings for residents (Resident #12, #15, #20, #35, #38, #41, #43 and #47). This was evident for 8 of 67 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Once the facility staff completes an in-depth assessment (MDS) of the resident, the interdisciplinary team meet and develop care plans. Care plans provide direction for individualized care of the resident. A care plan flows from each resident's unique list of diagnoses and should be organized by the resident's specific needs. The care plan is a means of communicating and organizing the actions and assure the resident's needs are attended to. The care plan is to be reviewed and revised at each assessment time of the resident to ensure the interventions on the care plan is accurate and appropriate for the resident. Care plan meetings are held each quarter and as needed. 1. Review of Resident #12's medical record on 2/15/24 revealed the Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to evaluate and document the condition of a resident's skin wound weekly (Resident #12). This is evident for 1 of 67 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings included: Review of Resident #12's medical record on 2/15/24 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to spinal cord injury. Further review of Resident #12's medical record revealed the Resident has a Moisture Associated Skin Damage wound to the sacrum that was in house acquired, deteriorating and 10 months old. Review of the facility documented weekly assessments for Resident #12's sacral wound revealed there was no documented skin assessment including measurements on 12/4/23 and 12/25/23. Weekly assessments of wounds allow the facility staff to determine if the treatment needs to be changed. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 2/22/24 at 9:45 AM confirmed the facility staff failed to evaluate and document the condition of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The Findings: on 2/21/24 at 8:00 an observation with Staff #12 a single door food cart on Unit 100 covered with dirt/food debris inside and outside of the cart. Milk sitting on top of food cart not on ice or kept cold. Milk remained on top of the food cart not chilled until 8:30 AM and uncovered. The double door food cart doors were left open as staff delivered the breakfast trays in the halls. An observation with DON on 2/21/24 at 8:28 AM of the double door food cart that has a plastic covering coming off the doors leaving the cart not to be properly clean. The DON stated that the cart was new, and the protective film was not removed prior to circulation of the cart. An observation at 8:33 AM on Unit 200 milk was noted on the top of the food cart uncovered and not kept on ice. An observation at on Unit 700 at 8:55 AM milk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and documentation review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices and guidelines to prevent the development and transmission of infection and disease. This was evident during meal service, in the kitchen and infection control supplies on 4 of 8 nursing units. The findings include: 1. Observation of the kitchen on 2/21/24 at 10:00 AM with Director of Dining Services revealed the kitchen had 2 handwashing sinks for kitchen staff and both had empty soap dispensers. Interview with the Director of Dining on 2/21/24 at 10:00 AM confirmed the soap dispensers should be filled with soap and functioning for kitchen staff to wash their hands during meal preparation and kitchen clean up. 2. Observation of meal service on 2/21/24 at 8:20 AM in Resident #65's room revealed an enhanced barrier precautions sign outside the door. The sign instructs caregivers, staff and visitors to perform hand hygiene before and after patient contact, contact with environment and after removal of PPE (personal protective equipment).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-28 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment and showers rooms in safe operating condition. The findings include: On 2/21/24 at 9 AM and at 1 PM during an tour of the facility's kitchen with the Director of Dinning Services and the Director of Maintenance the following observations were made: 1. The walk-in refrigerator door was observed slightly ajar and incapable of closing properly as designed. This was also observed on 2/22/24 at 8:15 AM with the Administrator. 2. The hand sink did not have hand soap available. This was also observed on 2/22/24 at 8:15 AM. 3. The hand sink by the ice machine did not have soap available. This was also observed on 2/22/24 at 8:15 AM. 4. The 3-panel light switch did not have a cover exposing the wires. 5. Review of pest control logs mention the floor and walls under the dishwasher as a problem area that is commonly soiled. 6. The water temperature to the hand sinks was 93 degrees Fahrenheit. 7. The 3 compartments sink water temperature was 94 degrees Fahrenheit. 8. The dishwasher did not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-28 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews and review of the facility pest control records, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control program, specifically concerning roaches and mice. The findings included: On 2/20/2024 at 10:30 AM in the Nursing conference room a roach was noted by the surveyor crawling on the wall. The DON was made aware and killed the roach. On 2/21/24 at 9 AM two Roches were noted on the kitchen wall. The facility's pest control logs were reviewed on 2/21/2024 and showed that a pest control company services the facility. On 1/31/24 the pest control company recommendation was to correct water leak and standing water by the dishwasher and to repair cracks and damage walls to prevent pest entry in the kitchen. Further, recommendations by the pest control company were made on 2/6/24 and 2/13/24 to repair cracks and damage walls to prevent pest entry into the kitchen and to fix water leaks. On 2/21/24 at 9 AM a tour of the kitchen revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical record, observation and interview, the facility staff failed to treat every resident with respect and dignity (Resident #10, #35, #44 and #64). This was evident for 4 of 67 residents during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1. Review of Facility Reported Incident (FRI) MD00200039 on 2/15/24 revealed on 11/29/23 former EVS (Environmental Services) Director (Staff #25) had Resident #10 mopped his/her own urine. Review of Resident #10's medical record on 2/15/24 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include intracranial injury. On 8/9/17 the Resident was certified by a physician to lack adequate decision making capacity. Further review of FRI MD00200039's facility investigation revealed Staff #25's statement on 11/29/23 at 9:32 AM included Staff #25 stated: I seen Resident #10 had urinated in his/her favorite place so I asked him/her did he/she urinate on the floor, he/she said yes. I walked to the closet and got the cart and took to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from abuse from another resident (resident #24) and abuse from a staff member (resident #46). This was evident for 2 of 67 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 7/11/23, the State of Maryland's Office of Health Care Quality received a facility reported incident (MD00194246) which reported the investigation of an alleged abuse of resident #24 by resident #23. The facility investigation substantiated physical abuse by resident #23 toward resident #24. Medical record review on 2/16/24 at 12:00pm revealed resident #24 was a long-term care resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of stroke and difficulty walking. Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Schizophrenia and mild cognitive impairment. Facility reported incident (FRI) investigation review on 2/16/24 at 12:10pm revealed GNA #45 reported the alleged abuse incident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to report alleged abuse of a resident (residents # 18, #26, #37, and #39) to law enforcement. This was evident for 4 out of 67 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. Findings include: On 8/21/23, the Office of Health Care Quality received a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) report (MD00195815) which reported the alleged abuse of resident #18 by facility staff. The FRI investigation was unable to substantiate abuse of resident #18. Review of resident #18's medical record on 2/15/24 at 12:44pm revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of dementia. Review of the FRI investigation on 2/15/24 at 12:50pm revealed resident #18 alleged 4 staff members beat him/her and the resident stated that his/her backs because of the abuse. The investigation did not reveal any evidence that the facility attempted to contact local law enforcement to report the allegation of abuse. Interview with the Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of facility documentation, medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an effective discharge planning process for a resident (Resident #12). This was evident 1 of 34 discharged residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: During interview of Resident #12's Representative on 2/23/24 at 10:43 AM, the Representative stated the facility failed to have the durable medical equipment in place at the time of the Resident's discharge home on 2/14/24. The Representative stated he/she had a meeting with social work prior to the Resident's discharge and was told a wheelchair would be at the facility for the Resident to go home in and there would be a hospital bed and hoyer lift delivered to the Resident's home prior to his/her arrival. The Representative stated at the time of discharge the wheelchair was not at the facility and the equipment was not delivered until 8:30 PM after the Resident arrived home. The Representative then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to place a discharge summary on a resident's (resident #21 and #34) medical record after discharge. This was evident for 2 of 67 residents reviewed in a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of resident #21's medical record on 2/22/24 at 12:36pm revealed no evidence of a discharge summary after the resident discharged from the facility on 5/31/23. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 2/22/24 at 1:36pm revealed the resident discharged from the facility when local law enforcement placed the resident under arrest for violation of his/her probation. The surveyor pointed out that the progress notes on the resident's medical record provide no evidence that the resident discharged from the facility on 5/31/23. The DON reviewed the progress notes and agreed that the facility failed to place a discharge summary on the resident's medical record. 2. Review of resident #34's medical record on 2/23/24 at 10:00am revealed no evidence of a discharge summary after the resident from the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the medical record review and resident interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that dependent resident (resident #67) personal hygiene needs were adequately met by not providing hot water showers and baths as scheduled. This was evident for 1 of 67 residents reviewed during the complaint survey process. The findings include: In an interview with Resident #67 on 2/21/24 at 09:48 AM, revealed that Resident #67 stated I don't take showers or baths. I would like a shower because I'm young and still get my menstrual. The water temperature is too cold. A review of Resident's #67's Treatment Administration Records (TARs) revealed that the resident is scheduled to receive showers on Tuesday and Friday and daily bath. For the month of February 2024, the resident received no showers and only 3 baths for the month. On 2/22/24 at 12:30 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that it's not unusual for the Resident to refuse care and then handed the surveyor a care plan for refusal of care with ADL's . The DON was unaware that the shower water temperature was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to assess and document a resident's need for pain medication (Resident #14). This was evident for 1 of 67 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #14's medical record on 2/15/14 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital for rehabilitation services. Review of Resident #14's August 2023 Medication Administration Record revealed the Resident was administered Acetaminophen 650 mg on 8/1/23, 8/2/23, 8/3/23, 8/5/23, 8/6/23, twice on 8/7/23 and 8/9/23. Acetaminophen is a medication used to treat pain and fever. The Resident was transferred to the hospital on 8/9/23 and did not return to the facility. Further review of Resident #14's medical record revealed no assessment or documentation of why the Resident was receiving Acetaminophen. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 2/22/24 at 11:00 AM confirmed the facility staff failed to assess and document Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards (Resident #15) This was evident for 1 of 67 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: A medical record is the official documentation for a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. Review of Resident #15's medical record on 2/15/24 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on 9/27/23. Further review of the Resident's medical record revealed after the Resident was discharged on 9/27/23, the facility staff documented on 9/28/23 they administered medications, a hour of sleep snack and documented a blood pressure of 112/70. Review of the Resident's September 2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-10-16 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to have a full time CDM (Certified Dietary Manager) or certified licensed Dietician on staff and in the kitchen on a full time basis. This practice had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: The Dietary Manager (Staff #7) was interviewed on 10/8/19 at 8:15 AM. The Dietary Manager stated that he was currently in school to get his CDM (Certified Dietary Manager) License. Dietician #14 stated she/he does not routinely remain in the kitchen to observe the tray line and only works two to four days per week. There were two other Dieticians on staff but they were not Registered Dieticians. After speaking with staff # 14, she/he was in the kitchen on 10/11/19 to watch the tray line and take temperatures and monitor staff. The Administrator was made aware.
- Potential for harm · E2019-10-16 · tag F0622 — patternNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, the facility failed to send the comprehensive care plan goals with the residents who were sent to the hospital. This was evident for 4 (Residents #81, #98, #124, and #179) out of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: 1. Resident #81 was sent to the hospital on 1/31/19 due to a fall from mild orthostatic hypotension and a drop in blood pressure. A written notice of transfer to the hospital was sent to his/her responsible party and a bed hold policy was given to the resident. There was no evidence that the care plan goals were sent with the resident to the hospital. The Director of Nursing was made aware of these findings and acknowledged that the care plan goals were not sent to the hospital with the resident. 2. Resident #98's medical record was reviewed on 7/18/19. The review revealed that Resident # 98 was admitted to the hospital with urinary tract infection, sepsis, acute renal failure and elevated troponin. There was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation of the kitchen, it was determined that the kitchen staff: 1) failed to label and date food that was cooked and put away in the refrigerator; 2) failed to date food placed in the dry storage room; and, 3) failed to monitor staff for hair net use in the kitchen. The findings include: 1) On 10/07/19 at 06:22 PM, the Kitchen was observed. Staff #3 was the supervisor on duty. During this time the kitchen staff was in the process of putting food on the plates to distribute to units. During observation in the dry storage room, there were plastic containers filled with 4 types of cereal, Cheerios, Corn Flakes, Raisin Bran and [NAME] Crispy's. None of the containers were dated. There were, also, 3 trays of cereal in bowls (approx. 120 bowls) that were covered but not dated. On 10/8/19 at approx. 8:30 AM this surveyor met with the Director of Dietary Services and again the dry storage room was observed and an additional 39 Bowls of cereal not dated (counted by manager) an open loaf of Texas Toast was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff and resident interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that staff documented a physician's order for a suprapubic catheter for Resident #474. This was evident for 1 (Resident #474) of 44 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: On 10/8/19 at 9:42 AM during an interview, Resident #474 stated s/he had a suprapubic catheter. According to https://medlineplus.gov/ency/patientinstructions/000145.htm: A suprapubic catheter (tube) drains urine from your bladder. It is inserted into your bladder through a small hole in your belly. You may need a catheter because you have urinary incontinence (leakage), urinary retention (not being able to urinate), surgery that made a catheter necessary, or another health problem. On 10/11/19 at 11:39 AM during a review of the medical record for Resident #474, it was noted there was no documented physician order for a suprapubic catheter. During an interview with Unit Manager (UM) #15, she stated that she, also, was unable to find a physician order for the suprapubic catheter.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-16 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview with the Director of Dietary and Supervisor of Maintenance, the facility failed to have the freezer in safe working conditions. This practice has the potential to impact all residents receiving nutrition from the facility's dietary services. The findings include: On 10/7/19 at 6:41 PM an inspection of the kitchen was conducted. The temperature on the freezer door was - 20 degrees. To the right of the freezer door was metal shelves covered in thick frost. Fans in the freezer, also, contained thick frost. On one of the shelves to the right of freezer door, were ice cream cups stuck to the freezer shelf. Two other shelves contained trays of frozen food that were, also, stuck in the ice build up. On 10/8/19 at 8:45 AM, the Director of Dietary (# 7) was shown the freezer and removed 17 trays of food due to frost -10 degrees and discarded food. The Maintenance Supervisor (staff #16) came into to kitchen to look at the freezer door. He/she stated that the door is not even with the floor causing heat of kitchen to go under the freezer door. That the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-16 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record and staff interview, the facility staff failed to develop a treatment plan for Resident #33 eyes that were watery and bright red along the bottom of both eyelids. This was evident for 1 out of 67 residents investigated during the survey process. The findings Include: On October 7, 2019 during a late entrance tour of the facility around 6:30 PM, Resident #33's eyes were observed to be bright red along the base of both eyelids. The resident was not able to explain the redness to the eyes. On October 9, 2019 around 10:29 AM, Resident #33's eyes remained bright red around the bottom of each lid. On October 11, 2019 around 10:39 AM while reviewing the residents medical record, it was noted that there was no treatment ordered for the resident's eyes. The resident was observed in the bedroom again this day with eye lids appearing the same, way watery and red. The Writer interviewed the Assistant Directorof Nursing (ADON) about the resident's condition. With surveyor intervention the ADON informed this writer that the ADON will have the Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that orders for as-needed psychiatric medication were limited to 14 days. This was evident for 1 (Resident #7) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The findings include: Resident #7's medical record was reviewed on 10/11/19 at 9:43 AM. During the review, it was found that the resident was prescribed an as-needed benzodiazepine antianxiety medication with the following instructions: Give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed for anxiety. The order date was 9/25/19, 16 days prior to the review date. Review of the physician notes did not reveal a rationale by the prescribing practitioner for why the medication should be extended beyond 14 days of use, nor did it reveal the intended duration of the therapy. Regulation requires that as-needed orders for psychotropic drugs be limited to 14 days. If the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the as-needed order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-16 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensurethat Resident #204 was not served food that would trigger a known food allergy. This was evident for 1 (Resident #204) of 12 residents identified by the facility as having food allergies. The findings include: On 10/8/19 at 10:10 AM during an initial interview, Resident #204 stated s/he sometimes gets food that s/he is allergic to or doesn't like. At 2:35 PM the resident was interviewed regarding that day's lunch. S/he stated s/he didn't like the food served and had asked for a salad substitute. The resident went on to say that the salad had tomatoes on it and s/he was allergic to tomatoes. A salad with tomatoes on it was observed in the room. An examination of the lunch ticket on the resident's food tray confirmed that dietary staff knew that the resident was allergic to tomatoes as it was clearly written on the ticket. When the surveyor went to speak to a nurse, Staff Nurse #2 was overheard telling a Dietary Aide that the food substitute that was served had tomatoes on it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to 1) ensure equipment used for personal hygiene was not left directly on the bathroom floor for Residents #199 and #475; and 2) ensure that a visitor of Resident #475 received education regarding why a gown and gloves needed to be worn when visiting the resident. This was evident for 2 (Residents #199 and #475) of 44 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1) On 10/8/19 at 9:57 AM during an inspection of the bathroom of Resident #199, a bedpan was observed lying on the floor of the bathroom. The bedpan was not in a plastic bag and was not labeled with a resident room number or name. Resident #199 was out of the room at the time. It is a standard of nursing practice to not store items used for personal hygiene directly on the floor. Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #1 was brought to the room and asked why the bedpan was on the floor. She stated she did not know and added that the resident did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-06-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the nursing staff failed to notify the physician that a resident (#133) was consistently refusing or not available for ordered insulin injections. This was evident for 1 of 37 residents sampled for investigations. The findings included: Resident #133 was admitted to the facility for care that included insulin injections to control diabetes. The physician ordered 10 units of Humalog insulin to be injected daily at 6:30 AM, 11:30 AM, and 4:30 PM. The physician also ordered a sliding scale insulin to be given at 6:30 AM, 11:30 AM, and 4:30 AM. Sliding scale insulin doses are dependent on the level of blood sugar at the time. For sliding scale the nurse first takes the blood sugar reading and then the dosage of insulin is made dependent on the blood sugar level. Resident #133 did not receive Humalog 10 units of insulin nor the sliding scale insulin due to refusal or for not being on the nursing unit for the 11:30 AM dose 11 times from May 1, 2018 through June 10, 2018. The 4:30 PM medications were not received 11 times…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-06-18 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the responsible party in writing of a Resident's (#124) transfer to the hospital. This was evident for 1 of 37 residents sampled for investigations. The findings include: On 4-25-18 Resident #142 was transferred to the hospital for seizure activity. The facility notified the responsible party verbally but did not send a written notice. This finding was confirmed by the Center Executive Nurse on 6-18-18 at 10:30 AM.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-06-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview with facility staff and review of resident medical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments accurately reflected the residents' status. This was true for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #48) reviewed for hospitalizations during the annual survey. The findings include: Resident #48's pneumonia status was incorrectly coded on the most recent MDS assessment. The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure that each resident receives the care they need. Resident #48's medical record was reviewed on 6/15/18 at 11:53 A.M. During the review, it was revealed that Resident #48 had returned from a recent hospitalization due to pneumonia as evidenced by the hospital's Discharge summary dated [DATE] (the date of readmission) and corroborated by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-06-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to revise and update a resident's (#133) care plan based on changing resident needs after the 5-12-18 quarterly assessment. This was evident for 1 of 37 residents selected for investigative review. A comprehensive care plan is used to identify care area concerns that are specific to the resident and are used to improve and maintain a resident's status. A care plan includes a measurable objective and a time frame to evaluate its effectiveness. The findings include: Resident #133 had their required quarterly assessment completed on 5-12-18. The diabetes - insulin dependent care plan was not revised to include Resident #133's refusal to take the ordered insulin injections at times and and for leaving the nursing unit and not returning for the ordered insulin doses. On 6-15-18 at 12:30 PM the Center Nurse Executive confirmed the nursing staff failed to update the care plan to include Resident #133's refusal and leaving the nursing unit so as to not receive the ordered insulin. On 6-15-18,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-06-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, it was determined the nursing staff failed to provide showers to a dependent resident (#121). This was evident for 1 of 1 residents selected for review during the survey process. A resident who is unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living requires the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal and oral hygiene. The findings include: On 6/18/18 a review of the resident's medical record was initiated. The concern exists that the resident is not receiving showers. The record reveals the shower days are Tuesdays and Fridays, on the 7/3 shift. On 6/15/18 at 2 PM, an interview with the Unit Manager, indicated the showers for this resident are not being documented. The only documented shower in the TASK section was on June 4, 2018. The resident is receiving bed baths on her shower days. In an observation of the resident on 6/15/18 at 2:00 PM, the resident's hair did not appear clean, and when asked, she stated her hair was dirty. The concern exists that the resident is not receiving her showers twice a week. The Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-06-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow a written physician order (Resident #333). This was evident for 1 of 37 resident's selected for investigative review. The findings include: Resident #333 has a history of gastrointestinal bleeding (GI bleed) but does not want to be sent to the hospital and prefers to be treated at the facility. On 6-10-18 Resident #333 developed symptoms of a GI bleed. At 6:10 AM the physician ordered the resident to receive an intravenous (IV) medication to prevent further bleeding and an IV of normal saline fluids to be given at 50cc an hour. On the medication administration record the IV of normal saline was not started until 6-11-18, at an unknown time. The IV medication was never received by the facility. A Nurse Practitioner assessed Resident #333 on 6-10-18 at 12:12 PM and noted the facility was unable to get the IV medication but took no action and failed to followup as to why the IV wasn't started. Resident #333 was sent to the hospital on 6-11-18 at 10:00 AM for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-06-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the nursing staff failed to implement ordered preventative measures to prevent heel pressure ulcers (#176) for 1 of 37 residents selected for investigative review. A pressure ulcer (also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer) is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according to their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II (superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister, or shallow crater), Stage III (full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), and Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone, or tendon). The findings included: On 2-1-18 Resident #176 was ordered Prevalon Boots to be put on both feet when in bed to prevent skin breakdown. A Prevalon Boot prevents pressure on the heels which leads to skin breakdown. On 6-12-18 at 9:00 AM Resident #176 was in bed but without the ordered boots. On 6-12-18 at 12:50 PM Resident #176…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview it was determined the nursing staff failed to properly secure medications left unattended on a resident's bedside tray (Resident #42) and failed to apply ordered fall mats (#176). This was evident for 2 of 37 residents selected for investigative review. The findings included: 1. On 6-11-18 at 9:15 AM while attempting to interview Resident #42 in their room it was noted, Resident #42 was asleep in the bed and on the bedside table was a medication cup with 4 pills left unattended. At 9:16 AM Nurse #1 confirmed the unattended pills were left on the bedside table and not administered to Resident #42. The medications were identified as T81 low dose aspirin 81 mg, A102 bupropion 300 mg, MP 542 spironolactone 50 mg, and GG296 loratadine 10 mg. The medications were the scheduled 8:00 AM doses. The medication administration nurse was questioned and had no idea how long the pills were left on the bedside table. Both the 6-10-18 and 6-11-18 8:00 AM medications were signed off on the medication adminitration record as given. On 6-13-18 at 9:30 AM the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-06-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facilty failed to acquire current pharmacy monthly orders in the medical record for Resident (#170). This was true for 1 of 1 resident selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: The facility must provide and establish a system from Pharmacy Services in acquiring records, receipts and disposition of medications to meet the needs of a resident. On 06/13/18 11:00 AM a review of Resident #170's medical record was initiated. The concern exists that the facility has not received the June Physician orders from the pharmacy. In an observation of the record, it was revealed that no June physician orders are on the chart. The resident was admitted to the facility 5/11/18 from an acute care facility. Diagnosis includes Alcoholism, asthma, depression, Syncope, and mastitis of the left breast. Medications on admission include Bupropion XL 300mgm for anxiety, Lamotrigine 100mgm for anxiety and a list of 16 other medications. In an interview with the Unit Manager(UM) on Station 5, on 6/13/18 it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-06-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, it was determined the facility staff failed to safely dispose of expired items in the refrigerator. The findings include: Effective food safety involves identifying hazards which could result in food safety concerns as storage and disposition of expired items in the kitchen. On 06/11/18 at 7:58 AM a review and observation of the kitchen found a large tray of egg salad in the refrigerator to have an expiration date, 5/29/18. The egg salad was covered with a torn piece of plastic wrap exposing the egg salad to the air. Upon surveyor intervention the egg salad was removed. The Administrator and Director of Nursing were made aware at the exit conference.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-06-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain a medical record in the most accurate form for residents (#133 and #42). This was evident for 2 of 37 residents selected for investigative review. The findings include: A medical record is the official documentation for a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. 1. Resident #133's medication administration record (MAR) was incomplete. On May 23 and 28, 2018 the nurse failed to document the required blood pressure and pulse before administering the ordered blood pressure medication Norvasc. On May 21, 24, 25, and 26, 2018 the nurse failed to document the required pulse before administering the ordered Norvasc. On June 8, 2018 the nurse failed to documnent on the MAR the amount of insulin given and the injection site used for the 6:30 AM sliding scale insulin. On May 1 and 2, 2018 the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-06-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a sanitary and comfortable environment for residents. This was true for 3 of 60 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 106, and 209) reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: The facility failed to maintain a sanitary and comfortable environment in resident rooms [ROOM NUMBER]. During an observation that took place on 6/12/2018 at 9:14 A.M., room [ROOM NUMBER] was found to have sticky tan-colored fluid underneath the resident's tube feeding machine and brown crumbling material that resembled dirt on the floor beneath a potted plant. The resident's bedside table and over-the-bed table were both sticky to the touch. Flies were present in the room around the sticky material. During a repeat observation that took place on 6/18/2018 at 9:30 A.M., room [ROOM NUMBER] was found to have more brown sticky matter below the tube feeding machine and flies were still present. The Director of Nursing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$101,131 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $24,195 — penalty dated 2026-04-17
- $63,846 — penalty dated 2025-10-17
- $13,090 — penalty dated 2024-02-28
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-06 for 13 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.0 | -2.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 86 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 86; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CUSTOMERS BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | since 07/01/2024 |
| FOUNTAIN, JULIET | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/08/2025 |
| GUNTHORPE, JAHIRI | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/08/2025 |
| HARMAN, DINA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/08/2025 |
| VIROJA, YOGESH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/08/2025 |
| POSEN, MINDEE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/01/2024 |
| FLAGLER, OSHER | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | since 04/28/2023 |
| KAHANOW, AVIVA | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2024 |
| LEVOVITZ, TZVI | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2024 |
| ROKOWSKY, YITZCHOK | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2024 |
| NFR 2020 IRRV TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/16/2024 |
| QUINTO NEXGEN LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/16/2024 |
| RSBRMK HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/16/2024 |
| SK NEXGEN TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/16/2024 |
| SKILLED VENTURE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/16/2024 |
| TRYKO NEXGEN HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/16/2024 |
| UAK 2020 IRRV TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/16/2024 |
| UKR NEXGEN LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/16/2024 |
| YK NEXGEN TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/16/2024 |
| YR NEXGEN TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/16/2024 |
| VOHRA, YOGESH | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/08/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215067. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.