No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Collingswood Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

299 Hurley Avenue, Rockville, MD 20850 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 160 certified beds · (301) 762-8900 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (301) 762-8900 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Aug 2022Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Aug 2022
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (74) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
SleepMed0.8 mi
1901 Research Blvd #160 · (301) 251-5905 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1803 Research Blvd Ste 102 · (833) 557-3784 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Giant0.6 mi
Wootton Pkwy · (301) 340-9378 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.9%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.4%5.4%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms97.5%22.8%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.9%22.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.3%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.4%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.0%5.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.0%25.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.9%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.2%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine48.3%80.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.2%21.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.9%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.841.331.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.601.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 410 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
48.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.09U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.04hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 48.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 91 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 46% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.4%CMS range 50.0–61.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.0%CMS range 10.8–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge48.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge41.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge28.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened9.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 5.3–9.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.161.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
1.09
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.23
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.96
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
34.8%
Total nursing turnover
29.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 148.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.96 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

22
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-08)
30
at the previous standard inspection (2022-08-23)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

74 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 64 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to report an injury of unknown origin of a resident timely to the State of Maryland's OHCQ. This was evident for 2 (Resident # 2, #8) out of 4 resident records reviewed for alleged injuries of unknown origin during a complaint survey. The Finding include: 1) Review of facility reported incident #2682365 on 1/5/25 at 11:35 AM revealed Resident #8's family member sent an email to the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 11/18/25 reporting they noticed a contusion on Resident #8's right upper arm while visiting on 11/14/25. Upon investigation, the facility interviewed Staff #2, the Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) who was assigned to care for Resident #8 on 11/14/25. Staff #2's written statement revealed Resident #8's family member reported to her that they noticed a skin issue on Resident #8 at approximately 2:30 PM on 11/14/15. She prepared to check the resident, but the family member indicated that the resident was asleep and asked Staff #2 to not disturb him/her. Staff #2 indicated that she did not check…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility reported incident investigations and interview it was determined the facility 1) failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse and 2) injuries of unknown source. This was evident for 1 (Resident #3) of 2 residents reviewed for abuse, and 1 (Resident #7) of 3 residents reviewed for injury of unknown source during the complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 1/5/26 at 2:43 PM, an initial review of a facility reported incident, 2663799, alleged Resident #3 had been abused. The self-report documented on 11/7/25, around 1:15 PM, Resident #3 gave the Unit Manager (UM) a handwritten note that alleged s/he had been abused by staff during care on his/her 2nd day of admission. The resident did indicate what shift the alleged abuse occurred or identify any staff. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], indicating the alleged abuse occurred on 11/5/25, At that time, a brief review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure each resident's medical record was complete and accurately documented. This was evident for 1 (Resident #5) of 3 residents reviewed for Quality of Care during the complaint survey.The findings include: The facility's investigative documentation related to Facility Reported Incident #2677827 was reviewed on 1/6/26 at 1:05 PM. The documentation revealed Resident #5, who was his/her own decision maker, failed to inform staff and left the faciity on [DATE] at approximately 2:00 AM. Staff initiated proper protocol and later determined the resident had returned home safely. Further review of the documentation revealed Resident #5 was presented with a notice of non-coverage on 11/21/25 which indicated the resident's last date of insurance coverage (LCD) for his/her stay in the facility would be 11/22/25. The notice included the resident's right to appeal the discharge. The resident signed the notice. Review of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a tour of the kitchen, staff interview and observation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to label stored food items to ensure safety and prevent contamination which could lead to unsafe food and potential illness. This has the potential to affect all residents.The findings include:During the initial tour of the kitchen on 07/31/2025 at 0740 AM these items were found in the walk-in cooler: Box of blue berries box of 4 pks not labeled with received by date or used by date. Box of oranges with no received by dates. Biscolli cheese received by date of 5/29/2025 with no used by date. Found in the deep freezer: Box of chicken thighs - not labeled. 2 Logs of Sysco Fire River farm ground beef sitting on 2nd shelf and 1 log by itself on cart all without labels.The Dietary Aide (Staff #62) was interviewed on 7/31/2025 at 7:58 AM. The surveyor showed him/her the unlabeled items and the items without a used by date. He/ She stated that the unlabeled items should have had a received by date label,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, review of Resident Council Minutes/facility documents, and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to: address grievances from the Resident Council meeting, inform staff and residents of the Grievance Process (including how to file concerns or grievances), and have resolutions to grievances/concerns to include notifying residents regarding a resolution. This was evident for 5 of 6 months of Resident Council meetings reviewed the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 08/06/2025 at 1:54 PM, a review of Resident Council Minutes from January 2025 through July 2025 revealed the following unaddressed concerns:-In January 2025, review of Resident Council minutes revealed a resident's concern regarding staff's unwillingness to provide restroom assistance. There was no evidence that this concern was addressed or that the resident was informed of a resolution.-In February 2025, persistent concerns regarding staff members not responding to a resident's call light and exhibiting impatience during toileting or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-08 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure 1) a baseline care plan was completed and 2) a BLCP summary, including a current list of medications, was provided to the resident and/or resident representative (RP). This was evident for 3 (Resident #54, #160, #2) out of 36 residents reviewed during the investigation phase of the facility's recertification survey.The findings include:A baseline care plan (BLCP) must be completed within 48 hours of a resident's admission to the facility and include the initial goals based on admission orders, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, and social services. A summary of the BLCP and current medication list must be given to each resident and/or his/her representative. Completion and implementation of the BLCP is intended to promote continuity of care and communication among staff, increase resident safety, and safeguard against adverse events (undesirable outcomes) that can occur…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on family interview, staff interview, and clinical record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure residents were free from accidents by failing to properly educate staff on how to operate a Hoyer lift, and by failing to maintain supervision of residents from the locked dementia unit. This was evident for 3 (Resident #4, #95, #20) of 7 residents reviewed for accidents during the facility's recertification survey.The findings include:The Health Care Decisions Act, which became effective [DATE], applies in all healthcare settings. In Maryland a patient is presumed to have capacity until two physicians certify that the individual lacks the capacity to make healthcare decisions or a court has appointed a guardian of person to make health care decisions. The form in the medical record titled, Physician's Certification of Incapacity to Make an Informed Decision, documents that a physician has examined a resident on a specific date and time and based on that examination finds the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to have an emergency dialysis access ports/shunts clamps in rooms as ordered for residents on dialysis. This was evident of 5 (Resident #66, #42, #103, #109, and #124) of 5 residents on dialysis rooms checked during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: A dialysis Arteriovenous (AV) fistula is a connection between an artery and a vein to make it possible to receive dialysis. Dialysis is a treatment that filters and purifies the blood using a machine. This helps keep your fluids and electrolytes in balance when the kidneys can't do their job. In the event there is continuous bleeding from the AV fistula, clamps can be applied to the puncture site to effectively control the bleeding. Review of Resident #66's medical record on 07/31/2025 at 10:43 AM revealed that resident received dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays.Further record review on 08/04/2025 at 9:18 AM noted that resident had orders to monitor left arm AV fistula dialysis access site for signs/…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation of the soiled utility and laundry rooms, interviews staff, and documentation review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices and guidelines to prevent the development and transmission of infection and disease. This was evidenced by 1) soiled linens and residents' outfits were not bagged in plastic bags in the laundry room, and 2) Precaution signage for residents who required care were not appropriately placed. This was evident in four of four laundry bins and two (Resident #36 and #71) of the 63 residents reviewed for precaution signage during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings included:Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP) is a set of infection control measures used in addition to standard precautions when patients are known or suspected of being infected with pathogens that can be transmitted through specific routes. These precautions are designed to prevent the spread of infection and are implemented based on the mode of transmission of the infectious agent.Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) is an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-08 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Employee files and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure Geriatric Nursing Assistance (GNA) received at least 12-hours of In-Service training annually. This was evident for 3 (GNA #53, #54, and #55) out 5 reviewed for training. The findings include:On 08/08/2025 at 8:00 AM in review of GNA's training files revealed the following:1) In review of Employee # 53 Employee Training hours file, revealed Employee # 53 only received a total of 1.73 hours of training for the year of 2024.2) In review of Employee #54 Employee Training hours file, revealed Employee # 54 only received a total of 11.53 hours of training in a 2 year period for the years of 2023 and 2024.3) In review of Employee #55 Employee training hours file, revealed Employee #55 only received a total of 6.43 hours of training in a 2 year period for the years of 2022 and 2023. During an Interview with the Facility's Human Resource Director on 08/08/2025 at 8:46 AM, the Director stated that Employee's Annual 12 hour training for GNA's is completed through Relias…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 64 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to attend to and answer call bells in a timely manner for dependent residents (Resident #149). This was evident during a tour of the first floor when a call bell was observed to be active and was subsequently validated during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include: During a tour of the facility on 8/08/25, at 12:50 PM, a call bell screen on the 1 [NAME] unit showed that a call bell from Room [number of the room] had been active for 113 minutes. When the surveyor asked Staff #14 (a nurse) about the screen, she confirmed that the call had been on for 113 minutes. She added, someone is working on fixing something in that room.The surveyor immediately checked the room and found only Resident #149 lying in the bed. No other staff were present, and there was no evidence of a construction procedure. The resident was vulnerable, with a tracheostomy and tube feeding. While the surveyor was in the room, Staff #26 (Geriatric Nursing Aide) entered. After Staff #26 exited the room, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident's physician and/or responsible party (RP) following an accident/change in condition. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #160) reviewed for urinary catheters during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include:An indwelling urinary catheter, often referred to as a Foley catheter, is a flexible tube inserted into a patient's urethra (the tube that carries urine from the bladder to the outside of the body) and remains in place to collect the urine into a drainage bag. Urinary catheters can be ordered for several reasons such as urinary incontinence (leaking urine or unable to control when you urinate), urinary retention (being unable to empty your bladder), during and/or after a surgery, or related to other medical conditions such as a spinal cord injury. However, urinary catheters are associated with an increased risk of urinary tract infections…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of medical records and a staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notification of its bed-hold policy to the resident or their representative when the resident was transferred to an acute care facility. This was evident for three (Resident #8, #66, and #154) of five residents reviewed who were transferred to an acute care facility.In Maryland, the bed hold policy for long-term care facilities is governed by state regulations and Medicaid guidelines. Nursing homes must provide a written bed hold policy to residents at the time of admission and upon transfer to a hospital or for therapeutic leave. The policy details the duration of the bed hold, the rights of residents to return to the facility, and the the cost of holding the bed. 1) On [DATE], at 1:33 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #154's medical records. The records showed that on [DATE], around 4:40 AM, Resident #154 was found unresponsive. Staff initiated CPR and called 911. EMTs arrived around 4:55…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to hold care plan meetings of the interdisciplinary team for residents at the time of the quarterly revision of their care plan. This was evident for 1 (Resident #54) of 6 residents reviewed during the investigation phase of the facility's recertification survey.The findings include:A care plan is developed for residents to guide the care that they receive in the facility. It should be individualized and outlines the interventions used to address the residents' needs. They are required to be developed within 7 days of completion of a resident's admission comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment and revised at least every quarter (or more often as needed). The facility is required to have care plans developed and revised by an interdisciplinary team (IDT) including: the attending physician, a registered nurse, a nursing aide, a representative from dietary services, the resident, and the resident's representative (as practicable).A review of Resident #54's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews the facility failed to provide services to maintain hearing. This was evident for 1 of 2 (Resident #3) reviewed for communication difficulty and/or sensory problems (vision and/or hearing) during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include: On 07/31/2025, at 11:12 AM, Resident #3 was interviewed and stated that he/she had lost their hearing. Resident #3 reported requesting to see an ENT (Ear, Nose, and Throat) a month prior, but the nurse informed him/her that their insurance would not cover the visit.08/06/2025 at 8:15 AM, a review of Resident #3's medical record revealed no indication of an appointment for an ENT examination, nor any care plan addressing hearing difficulties.Further review of Resident #3's medical record progress notes revealed the following:-According to the Nurse Practitioner progress note dated on 06/30/2025, at 10:05 PM, the Nurse Practitioner assessed the resident, who reported left ear complaints and admitted to a hearing change, describing the ear as stuffy. Dark brown, dry, impacted earwax was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to implement wound consults timely which resulted in residents not receiving wound care treatments. This was evident for 2 (Resident #63 and #127) of 7 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include:1) On 08/01/2025, at 8:44 AM, a review of Resident #63's medical record revealed a wound progress note from 02/11/2025, at 5:43 PM. This note, signed by a wound Nurse Practitioner, documented a Stage 4 sacral wound. Recommended treatments included daily (and as needed) cleansing of the wound with wound cleanser, application of Dakins moistened fluffed gauze, and Zinc Oxide Paste to the periwound to the base of the wound, secured with bordered foam and an ABD pad.Continued review of Resident #63's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed a physician's order for sacral wound care. The order, effective from 7:00 AM on 02/07/2025 to 7:08 AM on 02/13/2025, prescribed daily cleansing with normal saline, application of Medihoney, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate and sufficient services, treatment, and care for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #160) reviewed for urinary catheters during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include:An indwelling urinary catheter, often referred to as a Foley catheter, is a flexible tube inserted into a patient's urethra (the tube carries urine away from the bladder to outside the body) and remains in place to collect the urine into a drainage bag. Urinary catheters are associated with an increased risk of urinary tract infections as well as other adverse events and should be used only when clinically indicated and ordered by a physician. Urine output is an important clinical indicator and can provide insight into a patient's status and guide their care. Normal urine output is approximately 0.5 to 1.0 mL/kg/h…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate pain management for a resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #13) out of 1 resident reviewed for pain during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include: A pain scale is a numerical scale, usually 0-10, used to determine the severity of a person's pain. Parameters (Instructions in an order on when a medication can be given) for a pain scale are used to determine which pain medication would be given according to a person's severity of pain.On 08/06/2025 at 9:03 AM, while reviewing Resident #13's medical record, a Physician order was found that was dated 07/05/2025 for Tylenol to be given every 6 hours as needed for Mild Pain- Scale 1-3.Further review of Resident #13's medical records revealed a care plan dated 11/09/2023 with a focus of: I have pain and/or potential for pain related to Gout, sacral wound, BPH (benign prostatic hyperplasia), CKD3 (chronic kidney disease stage 3) with interventions of : 1) Anticipate my need for pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation of medication carts and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure controlled substance medications are monitored to ensure accuracy. This was evident for 1 out of the 9 facility medication carts. The findings include: The medication cart for the 1 [NAME] unit revealed that the controlled substance logbook had gaps of where two nursing staff signed to verify each resident's controlled substance medication was counted and matched the number of pills, capsules, etc that were left. The controlled substance logbook had gaps under the signature page which showed no signatures for nurses starting their shift or signature for nurse ending their shift for the following: day shift on 6/2/25, day shift on 6/12/25, evening shift on 6/16/25, day shift on 6/18/25, day shift 6/21/25, day shift on 6/22/25, day shift on 6/27, and on night shift on 7/4/25. Staff #59 was shown that there were gaps in the sign on/sign off section of the controlled substance logbook and she replied Oh, I see.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical record and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to respond to recommendations made by consulting pharmacists in a timely manner. This was evident for 1(Residents #125) of 1 resident reviewed for unnecessary medication during the recertification survey.The findings include:An interview concerning the Medication Regimen Review (MRR) report was conducted with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 8/6/25 at 12:43 PM. The ADON stated that the pharmacist would send her and the unit managers the MRR via email. The ADON printed out the recommendations and provided the unit managers with copies to ensure the recommendations are addressed by the physician. the physician will sign and put the copy in the binder. The binder is stored in the Director of Nursing (DON)'s office; however, a copy of the completed recommendation is not placed in the paper chart. The ADON also stated that the facility is going to change this process to make sure a copy is placed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on the medication administration task it was determined that the facility nursing staff failed to ensure residents receive medication according to physician's orders. This was evident for 2 medications out of the 26 medications observed as part of the medication administration task during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Resident #121 was observed at 11:11 AM on 8/6/25 to have been administered insulin at 11:11 AM instead of the 9:00 AM scheduled administration time. This represented a delay of one hour and eleven minutes beyond the medication administration window of one hour before or one hour after the scheduled time. Resident #91 was observed to have received insulin at 11:12 AM on 8/6/25 instead of the 9:00 AM scheduled administration time. This represented a delay of one hour and twelve minutes beyond the medication administration window of one hour before or one hour after the scheduled time. The facility administration team was informed of the findings at the exit conference on 8/8/25.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations of medication rooms and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a medication refrigerator maintained proper temperature. This was evident for 1 out of the 2 medication rooms that were observed as part of the medication administration task during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: This surveyor observed the medication refrigerator of one west on 8/8/25 at 11:20 AM. The freezer compartment was filled approximately 3/4 of the way with a solid piece of ice. This finding was shown to the Unit Manager who replied Oh, I have to defrost. The thermometer read 28 degrees Fahrenheit. The thermometer was shown to the Unit Manager who said Probably because it was so close to the freezer. I'll move it or get another thermometer.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to adequately monitor and track residents receiving antibiotics. This deficiency was evident in 1 (Resident #11) of the 3 residents reviewed for antibiotic use and the facility's antibiotic stewardship program during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings included:Background on Antibiotic Stewardship: Effective antibiotic stewardship requires a facility to develop and implement robust policies, procedures, or protocols to ensure residents needing antibiotics are treated appropriately. This is crucial for minimizing the risk of adverse drug reactions, preventing unnecessary antibiotic administration, and mitigating the development of antibiotic-resistant organisms. A facility-wide process for monitoring antibiotic use is essential, with results and feedback consistently reported to nursing staff and prescribing clinicians.On 8/05/25, at 9:40 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #11's medical records regarding his/her antibiotic use. The review revealed that Resident #11 had wounds on the left lower legs with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, and observation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a call system operated correctly for each room. This was evident for 1 resident (#85) out of 60 residents in the survey sample. The findings include: While interviewing Resident #85 on 7/31/25 at 11:22 AM it was observed that the call bell system was alerting staff to the fact that the resident needed assistance. This surveyor asked the resident about the call bell going off. The resident replied that it will not turn off. The unit manager came into the room at 11:25 AM and asked if the resident needed assistance. The resident replied No, it comes on by itself and will not turn off. It has been like this for two days. Staff respond, ask what do I need, and when I reply nothing, they turn it off and leave but it comes back on. Resident then added that it had been like this for two days. The Unit Manager said she would take care of it and left. This surveyor asked the resident for clarification as to how long this has been going on. The resident replied, Two days.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of a complaint, interview, and observation of resident wheelchairs, it was determined the facility failed to provide maintenance services necessary to keep all wheelchairs in a sanitary, comfortable, and well-maintained condition. This was evident on 2 of 3 nursing units observed during the complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 5/6/25 at 2:00 PM a review of complaint MD00216562 alleged that Resident #3 went out to an appointment. The resident attended the appointment in a wheelchair. The complaint alleged that the family and resident were embarrassed about the condition of the wheelchair and the padding. The complaint alleged, the doctor/nurse was also taken aback by the stench that we have complained about for months. Upon unzipping the pillow, we were all appalled, disgusted, and I, embarrassed, by the urine and fecal matter present in the gel pad and the inside of the pillow cover. The complaint stated, the presence of urine and fecal matter in and of itself can cause other issues to include wounds in the area subjected to such filth. The complaint stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 4 (Resident #22, #24, #18, #3) of 46 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1a) On 5/13/25 at 10:50 AM a review of Resident #22's medical record was conducted. Review of the weight section of Resident #22's medical record documented on 12/14/23 the resident's weight was 128.0 lbs. The next weight was taken on 1/5/24 and was 102.2 lbs. which was a 25.8 lb. or 20 percent weight loss in 3 weeks. Review of the MDS Assessment with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on complaint, medical record review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a custom-made wheelchair was available for a resident during transport to an appointment. This was evident for 1 (Resident #4) of 28 residents reviewed for complaints during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 5/12/25 a review of complaint MD00215793 was conducted, and it was alleged that Resident #4 obtained a broken ankle at the facility. Review of an investigation done by the facility revealed staff written statements that Resident #4 did not have a fall. Staff statements documented that Resident #4 was transferred with 2 people from the bed to the wheelchair in a Hoyer lift per the care plan. A written statement from Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #37 documented the resident was sliding from the wheelchair. GNA #37 and 4 other staff members helped pull the resident up and reposition the resident. Despite being repositioned, Resident #4 continued to slide from the wheelchair. At that time Resident #4 was transferred to a different wheelchair by staff. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to notify a resident's physician timely for a change in condition (Resident #10) and failed to timely notify a resident's physician, responsible party, and dietician of a significant weight loss (Resident #22). This was evident for 2 of 28 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to notify Resident #10's physician for a low blood pressure timely. Review of Resident #10's medical record on 5/7/25 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with a diagnosis to include heart failure. Heart failure occurs when the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs. Further review of Resident #10's medical record revealed a nurse's note on 10/27/24 at 11:40 PM stated outgoing nurse reported that resident's blood pressure just suddenly dropped to 70/54, writer went to resident room blood pressure assess 81/54. Another nurse's note on 10/28/24 at 1:14 AM stated, writer assessed patient and no distress noted, paged provider about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on reviews of facility reported incidents and interview, it was determined the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the regulatory agency, the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) within 2 hours of the allegation. This was evident for 3 (Residents #6, #1, #18) of 13 residents reviewed for facility reported incidents during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 5/8/25 at 12:13 PM a review of facility reported incident MD00212791 was conducted and revealed Resident #6 was noted with a laceration to the right thumb area on 12/17/24 at 5:40 PM. Resident #6 was non-verbal and cognitively impaired and could not verbalize how the injury happened. Review of the facility's investigation revealed the injury happened on 12/16/24. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #19 confirmed that he worked on 12/16/24 and stated that the physical therapist had reported to him that the resident was bleeding from the right thumb. LPN #19 stated he did not document the incident or notify the supervisor. Facility administration did not become aware of the incident until the next day.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to have quarterly care plan meetings for a resident (Resident #12). This was evident for 1 of 7 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Once the facility staff completes an in-depth assessment (MDS) of the resident, the interdisciplinary team meet and develop care plans. Care plans provide direction for individualized care of the resident. A care plan flows from each resident's unique list of diagnoses and should be organized by the resident's specific needs. The care plan is a means of communicating and organizing the actions and assure the resident's needs are attended to. The care plan is to be reviewed and revised at each assessment time of the resident to ensure the interventions on the care plan is accurate and appropriate for the resident. Care plan meetings are held each quarter and as needed. Review of Resident #12's medical record on 5/6/25 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in November 2020 with a diagnosis to include dementia. Dementia is a general term for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident medical record, the facility failed to provide care (toileting/ turning/ positioning) on day shift for Resident # 37 who is extensive assistance with 2 person assistance. This is evident for 1 out of 1 person reviewed during the complaint survey. Findings include: MDS is a A Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a standardized, core set of data elements used for clinical assessment in various settings, including nursing homes and skilled nursing facilities. It provides a common language and format for collecting and analyzing data, ensuring consistency and comparability across different facilities and locations. The MDS helps identify resident care problems, informs individualized care plans, and is used for reimbursement and quality monitoring purposes. Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 9/17/22 due to a lack of care. On 5/6/25 at 9:28 AM, an investigation was conducted for Resident # 37. The Resident came to this facility for rehab after surgery for periprosthetic hip…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of complaints, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide care to meet the needs of a resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial health (Resident #10 and #13). This was evident for 2 of 28 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to address the recommendations of a consultant for Resident #10. Review of Resident #10's medical record on 5/7/25 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with a diagnosis to include anemia and thyrotoxicosis. Anemia is a problem of not having enough healthy red blood cells or hemoglobin to carry oxygen to the body's tissues and Thyrotoxicosis is a treatable condition that happens when you have too much thyroid hormone in your body. Further review of Resident #10's medical record revealed the Resident was seen by a Consultant on 12/18/24 for anemia, volume status and secondary hyperparathyroidism. Review of the Consultant's 12/18/24 note revealed the Consultant documented, The patient was seen this morning,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, documentation review, and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to recognize a resident's weight loss and notify the physician and dietician promptly in order for interventions to be placed timely. This was evident for 1 (Resident #22) of 28 complaints reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 5/13/25 at 10:50 AM a review of complaint MD00202446 alleged the facility staff were not feeding Resident #22. A review of Resident #22's medical record was conducted and revealed a 12/15/23 note that Resident #22 was admitted for comprehensive rehabilitation and had admitting diagnoses that included cerebral infarction without residual deficits, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia and a sacral wound. Resident #22 was prescribed a regular diet with moist ground meat, finely chopped vegetables texture, thin consistency. A physician's physical and history note dated 12/15/23 documented the resident was admitted to the hospital with weakness and decreased intake and weight loss. Review of a 12/15/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment by failing to have a process in place to accurately screen people entering the facility for signs and symptoms of COVID-19 and failing to monitor the screening results. This was evident during surveyor entrance to the facility and Infection Control review. The findings include: An observation was made upon entry to the facility on 7/26/22 at approximately 7:55 AM. Surveyor (#1) entered the front lobby and observed the reception desk to the left (approximately 40 feet from the front door) and main hallway to the elevators. The receptionist at the desk requested that the surveyor complete the screening process using a tablet kiosk located in front of the reception desk. A hand sanitizer dispenser was to the left of the kiosk. When the surveyor reached to apply hand sanitizer, a temperature reading, 96.3 F (degrees Fahrenheit) displayed on the front of the dispenser.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, homelike environment for their residents as evidenced by stains on the walls and ceiling tiles, bathroom vents not clean, cooling unit vents that were dusty and had debris on them, windows were cracked, and window screens had holes in them, failure to provide private closet space in each resident room, and failure to maintain a resident shower room in a safe and hygienic manner. This was found to be evident on 2 out of the 4 nursing units observed during the survey. The findings include: 1) On 7/25/22 at 10:49 AM, a tour of Resident #56's room revealed a brown substance splashed on the wall to the left of the bathroom door that was dried. 2) On 7/25/22 at 11:26 AM, a second tour of Resident #56's room revealed the cooling unit attached to the wall had food and paper in the air vents as well as a build-up of gray substance. The ceiling tiles in the right corner of the room had brown…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-23 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure residents and the resident's responsible representative were notified in writing of the reason for a transfer or discharge. This was found to be evident for 6 (Resident #26, #133,#196, #192,# 398, #533) out of 79 residents reviewed during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed the resident had severly impaired cognitive skills, and had two certification of incapacity to make informed decisions. The resident had a health care power of attorney (responsible respresentative). The resident was admitted to the facility in January 2022 and had a discharge to the hospital in June 2022 with a re-admission in July. Additional review of the medical record revealed that a Notice of Intent to Transfer/Discharge Resident form was completed on 6/26/22. This form includes information regarding where the resident was transferred to and why, as well as information regarding rights to appeal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-23 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, complaints and interview, it was determined that the facility 1) failed to have an effective system in place to ensure that copies of the baseline care plans were provided to the resident and or responsible representatives and 2) failed to provide residents/representatives with a copy of their baseline care plan that included a summary of the resident's medication, and 3) failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan that addressed a resident's diabetes . This was found to be evident for 4 (Resident #26, # 104, #192) out of 6 residents reviewed for care plans and evident for 1 (#283) of 2 residents reviewed for communication and 1(#289) of 31 residents review for general concerns during the annual and complaint survey.during the survey. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed the resident had severly impaired cognitive skills, and had two certification of incapacity to make informed decisions. The resident had a health care power of attorney (responsible respresentative). The resident was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure that comprehensive care plans were established and implemented as evidenced by: failure to incorporate restorative nursing program into a resident's care plan (Resident #26); failure to ensure that goals related to mobility accurately reflected the resident's current status and interventions (Resident #48); failure to ensure that care plans addressing residents' assessed activity preferences was initiated and implemented (Resident #26 and #48) and failed to develop a resident centered activity care plan that addressed the resident's medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs and included measurable objectives. This was evident for 6 (Residents #23, # 26, # 48, #105, #21, #131 ) of 6 residents reviewed for care plans, 1 (#131) of 6 residents reviewed for and mobility and positioning, and 1 (#23) of 7 residents reviewed for accidents. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed the resident had severely impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-23 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an ongoing resident centered activities program to improve or maintain the resident's physical, mental and psychosocial well-being, and independence, and failed to provide activities that reflected the resident interests and preferences. This was found to be evident for three out of six residents (Residents # 75, #105, #21) reviewed for activities during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: 1. Review of Resident #75's medical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility November 2021 with primary diagnoses of morbid obesity, partial paraplegia, and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar. The resident was dependent on staff, needing extensive assistance with daily care activities and transfers. The most recent Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15 out 15. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    F689 Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment free of hazards for residents as evidenced by a surveyor observation of a resident (Resident #113) with a fall risk bed that was not in lowest position. The findings include: On 8/01/22 at 5:48 AM, a tour of the 1 East Unit revealed Resident #113 lying sideways on the bed with his/her feet dangling off the side. Surveyor immediately alerted Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) # 67. A subsequent observation of Resident #113 on 8/1/22 at 6:18 AM, revealed the resident was lying upright in bed, however the bed remained at waist level. An interview with GNA # 67 on 8/1/22 at 6:21 AM revealed that s/he did not know that Resident #113 was a fall risk. GNA # 67 and the surveyor walked to Resident #113's room and s/he confirmed the bed was not in the lowest position. GNA #67 reported that when she/he left the room Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #62 had been providing respiratory care to the resident, so she/he had not lowered the bed per staff #67. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-23 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that physician progress notes were written, signed, and dated at each visit. This was evident for 2 (#33, #133) of 6 residents reviewed for positioning and mobility, and 1 (#23) of 7 residents reviewed for accidents. The findings include: 1) On 7/27/22 at 10:30 AM, a review of Resident #23's EMR (electronic medical record) revealed physician progress notes that were not written on the day that the resident was seen. There was a) a physician's progress note, with an effective date of 2/23/22 at 2:36 PM, that had a created date of 3/6/22 at 2:36 PM, b) a physician's progress note with an effective date of 4/25/22 at 9:11 PM that had a created date of 5/10/22 9:11 PM, and c) a physician's progress note, with an effective date of 6/9/22 at 7:56 PM, that had a created dated of 6/25/22 at 7:57 PM. 2) On 8/1/22 at 8:30 AM, a review of Resident #131's EMR revealed physician progress notes that were not written on the day the resident was seen. There was a) a physician's progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medical records were complete as evidenced by 1) the failure to ensure that documentation of the Physicians' Certification of Incapacity to Make an Informed Decision was kept in the facility's medical record (Resident #26); failed to ensure that old MOLSTs were voided when a new MOLST was completed (Resident #48). Additionally, based on interview and review of the medical record, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain accurately documented resident records by failing to maintain an accurate account of residents' personal property. This was evident for 1 (#105) of 2 residents reviewed for personal property. Also, based on record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records, by having contradictory CPR (Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation) orders active in the medical record. This was evident for 1 resident (#132) out of 3 closed records reviewed as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that orders for life-sustaining treatment were made in accordance with residents' advance directives, . This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #26, Resident # 113) out of 6 residents reviewed for advance directives. The findings include: Maryland Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) is a form which includes medical orders for emergency medical services or other medical personnel regarding CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) and other life sustaining treatment options. According to Maryland's Health Care Decision Act, unless otherwise provided in the document, an advance directive shall become effective when the patient's attending physician and a second physician certify in writing that the patient is incapable of making an informed decision. 1) On [DATE], review of Resident #26's medical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility in [DATE]. Review of the MOLST…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-23 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a grievance policy as evidenced by staff failing to report resident concerns to a supervisor. This was evident for 1 (#59) of 9 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: A medical record review for Resident #59 was conducted on 8/2/22 at 10:24 AM and revealed a History and Physical progress note from Attending Physician #61 that documented Resident #59 was in the facility for ongoing medical management. Resident #59 was on hemodialysis due to Chronic Renal disease, and had the following diagnoses: high blood pressure, pain in left shoulder, blindness, and muscle weakness. Further review revealed a Minimum Data Set, (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 5/26/22, that documented in section C that Resident #59 scored 15:15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status which indicated Resident #59 had no cognitive impairment. In section G it was documented that Resident #59 relied on staff for most daily functions, such as eating, toileting, bathing, personal hygiene, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-23 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy by failing to recognize, report, and investigate a resident's missing wheelchair as misappropriation of resident property. This was evident for 1 (#94) of 2 residents reviewed for personal property. The findings include: On 8/10/22 at 10:30 AM, a medical record review for Resident #94 revealed a Minimum Data Set, (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 6/19/22, which documented in section C that Resident #94 scored a 12:15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, which indicated no cognitive impairment. Documentation in section G revealed that Resident #94 relied on staff for transferring him/her from bed to chair and relied on wheelchair for locomotion on the unit. During an interview on 7/26/22 at 11:23 AM, Resident #94 reported that he/she had brought a wheelchair from home when admitted to the facility. Resident #94 reported that an unidentified staff member had taken the wheelchair from Resident #94's room and told the resident she was borrowing it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to protect their residents from a staff member who had been accused of abuse of a resident as evidenced by the staff member continuing to work with vulnerable residents after an allegation of abuse had been received. This was evident for 1 (#59) of 9 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: A review of an email sent to surveyor on 8/2/22 at 9:54 AM, revealed a police report that was filed on 7/29/22, for an allegation of abuse regarding Resident #59. An interview with the Administrator on 8/2/22 at 11:54 AM, revealed that she had a visit from 2 detectives regarding the abuse report, however, she was not given the alleged perpetrator's name. The Administrator reported that she had initiated an investigation. Administrator was informed of the complaint #MD00180931 which had named a perpetrator of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #59. She stated she would investigate it and provide the results of the investigation to the survey team. A review of the facility's investigation file on 8/8/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-23 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure that residents and the resident's responsible representative were notified in writing of the bed hold policy at the time of transfer to a hospital. This was found to be evident for 4 (Resident #26, #196, #192, #133 ) out of 12 reviewed for hospitalizations during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: A Bed-hold policy is the facility's policy regarding holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident is absent from the facility for therapeutic leave or hospitalization. 1) Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed that the resident had severly impaired cognitive skills, and had two certification of incapacity to make informed decisions. The resident had a health care power of attorney (responsible respresentative). The resident was admitted to the facility in January 2022 and had a discharge to the hospital in June 2022 with a re-admission in July. Further review of the medical record revealed that a Notice of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 2 (#131, #31) of 6 residents reviewed for positioning and mobility. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1) On 7/25/22 at 12:10 PM, Resident #131 was observed wearing a right hand splint (brace), sitting at a table in the dining area. At the time, the resident was observed picking up food with his/her left hand, feeding self with staff supervision. On 7/27/22 at 9:32 AM, Resident #131 was observed wearing a right hand splint while walking independently in the hall, and, on 8/1/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and revise the residents care plans after each comprehensive and quarterly assessment, failed to ensure that the residents and/or residents' representative were included in the development of the care plan and failed to update the resident's care plan when there was a change in their wishes for CPR and life sustaining measures. This was evident for 2 (#105, #23) of 4 residents reviewed for Care Plan. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility with the information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. Resident #105's representative was interviewed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of complaints and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff were able to access an interim supply of medications prior to the pharmacy's delivery of a resident's medication; failed to ensure that pain medication was administered according to the ordered parameters, failed to ensure that medication was administered as ordered; failed to ensure there were orders and a care plan to address the continued use of an indwelling urinary catheter, failed to provide care in accordance with standards of nursing practice by failing to follow physician orders, failed to reveal documentation to indicate that staff had attempted to obtain a urine sample, and failed to have an effective system in place to relay recommendations from consultations. This was found to be evident for 7 (Resident #193, #192, #197, #201, #202, #233, #21) out of 79 residents reviewed during the investigation stage of the survey. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #193's medical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, interview and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure tha wound treatments were completed as ordered and failed to ensure orders for treatment were included in the medical record. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #24) out of 5 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include: On 8/2/22, review of Resident #24's medical record revealed the resident had wounds to the right foot with orders for daily dressing changes. On 8/04/22 at 1:20 PM, surveyor observed nurse #65 prepare for and complete Resident #24's dressing changes. While preparing for the dressing change, surveyor observed nurse #65 obtain supplies which included: one pad of calcium alginate silver; one pad calcium alginate plain and one honey coated absorbent dressing. Surveyor observed the nurse remove the old dressings and then proceeded to clean three wounds: one on the ankle, one on the lateral (outer) side of the foot and one on the medial (inner) side of the foot. The nurse proceeded to apply the silver alginate dressing to the ankle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure that restorative nursing services were encorporated into residents' care plans and provided by staff as recommended upon discharge from therapy; failed to ensure for therapy evaluations were acted upon and care plans were updated to reflect current goals and interventions, and failed to ensure that residents with a limited range of motion received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decline in range of motion by failing to ensure that a resident's feet were supported when sitting in a wheelchair. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident # 26, #33) out of 10 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) and 1 (Resident #48) out of 6 residents reviewed for mobility/positioning. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed that the resident had severely impaired cognitive skills, required extensive assist for bed mobility and total dependence on staff for transfers and bathing. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-23 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure assessment of residents for the use of side rails, and that the resident and or the responsible representative were educated regarding the risks and benefits prior to the installation of side rails, and failed to ensure the mattress appropriately fit the bed in which side rails were being used. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #26 and # 188) out of 7 residents reviewed for accidents. Bed rails (also known as side rails) and grab bars are adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to the bed. They are available in a variety of types, shapes, and sizes. Some bed rails are not designed as part of the bed by the manufacturer and may be installed on or used along the side of a bed. All bed rails should be used with caution, especially with older adults and people with altered mental status, physical limitations, and certain medical conditions. The findings include: Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-23 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Certified Nursing Assistants working during the blanket waivers issued during the COVID - 19 pandemic had been appropriately trained when the waiver ended. This was evident for 2 (Staff #59 and Staff #60) of 2 staff reviewed. The findings include: An interview with Staff #60 on 7/27/22 at 11:11 AM revealed that she was a Certified Nursing Assistant and had not been certified as a Geriatric Nursing Assistant. A review of employee record for Staff #59 on 8/8/22 at 2:45 PM, revealed a Maryland Certification as a Nursing Assistant and not a Geriatric Nursing Assistant. Staff #59 had been hired in March 2020. On 8/8/22 at 3:01 PM, an interview with the Administrator revealed that she thought the waiver for GNA certification had been extended and would bring the guidance to the survey team. A review of the state licensing board revealed that Staff #59 had been a certified as a nursing assistant in 2020, no Geriatric certification had been issued. Staff #60 had been certified as a nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of medical records and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that narcotics removed from the resident's supply were administered to the resident as evidenced by staff documenting the removal of narcotics without documentation of the need for the narcotic or documentation that the narcotic was administered to the resident. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #193) out of 5 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #193's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation in April 2021 after a hospitalization for a hip replacement. The resident also had diagnoses of, but not limited to, high blood pressure, and osteoarthritis. Review of a physician progress note, with an effective date of 4/10/22, revealed the resident had decreased range of motion of the left hip secondary to pain and that the resident was on oxycodone and Tylenol for pain. Oxycodone is a narcotic pain medications. Narcotic pain medications are potent and effective at managing moderate to severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to timely respond and act upon a pharmacist's recommendations when notified of an irregularity,failed to ensure that the attending physician document in the medical record when an irregularity had been reviewed and what, if any action was taken, failed to ensure that the pharmacists findings were included in the resident's medical record or maintained within the facility and readily available for view, and failed to develop and maintain a policy that included the time frames for the physician to respond when notified of an irregularity in a residents monthly drug review. This was evident for 2 (#131, #23) of 6 residents reviewed for Advanced Directives. The findings include: 1) On 8/1/22 at 9:00 AM, a review of Resident #131's medical record revealed in a Consultant Pharmacist Report, dated 5/15/22, that the pharmacist requested the physician evaluate if a Trazodone (antidepressant) dosage reduction could be attempted at that time, which was followed by a handwritten…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from excessive medication as evidenced by administration of narcotic pain medication outside of the ordered parameters. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #193) out of 5 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #193's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation in April 2021 after a hospitalization for a hip replacement. The resident also had diagnoses of, but not limited to, high blood pressure, and osteoarthritis. Review of a physician progress note, with an effective date of 4/10/22, revealed the resident had decreased range of motion of the left hip secondary to pain and that the resident was on oxycodone and Tylenol for pain. Oxycodone is a narcotic pain medications. Narcotic pain medications are potent and effective at managing moderate to severe pain but have significant side effects and the potential for abuse. As a result, facilities are required to track the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to assess and document the indications for administering a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication to a resident. This was evident for 1 Resident (Resident #188) out of 5 residents reviewed regarding unnecessary medication. The findings include: A psychotropic drug is any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. On 8/3/2022 at 3:06 PM, review of Resident #133's medical record revealed that the resident was admitted for rehab following a hospitalization with diagnoses including, but not limited to, anxiety disorder. Further review revealed a physician order for Alprazolam tablets .5mg by mouth every 8 hours as needed for anxiety related to adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. These orders were in effect from 7/19/22-7/28/2022. Alprazolam is an antianxiety medication. On 8/5/22 at 9:12 AM, review of the medication administration Record (MAR), revealed the administration of Alprazolam on 7/19/2022, 7/24/2022, 7/26/2022 and 7/28/2022.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medication administration observation, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent for 2 (#50, #286) of 6 residents observed with 34 medication administration opportunities resulting in an error rate of 5.88 % by 2 Licensed Practical Nurses. The findings include: 1) ER (extended release) initials that follow the name of the medication means the medication will be released in the blood stream over an extended period. Breaking or crushing the pill form of the medication may cause too much of the medication to be released at one time which could cause serious side effects. EC and ER medications should not be crushed. On 8/11/22 at 9:23 AM, during an observation of medication administration, LPN, Staff #39, was observed dispensing 9 pills into a medication cup for Resident #50. One of the pills was Potassium Chloride ER. Staff #39 was then observed to crush the pills and mix the crushed pills in applesauce for the resident to take by mouth. Staff #39 committed an error while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors as evidenced by the failure to administer an anticoagulant medication on two consecutive days to a resident who recently had surgery, thereby putting the resident at increased risk of developing a blood clot. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #193) out of 79 residents reviewed during investigative stage of the survey. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive their medications as prescribed as evidenced by staff failing to administer a resident's medication as prescribed. This was found to be true for 1 (Resident #94) out of 79 residents reviewed. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #193's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation in April 2021 after a hospitalization for a hip replacement. The resident also had diagnoses of, but not limited to, high blood pressure, osteoarthritis and anemia. Review of a physician progress note, with an effective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that all medications and biologicals were stored and labeled properly. This was evident for 1 (#5) of 6 residents reviewed from medication administration and 3 of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage during the survey. The findings include: 1) On 8/12/22 at 9:26 AM, during a medication observation, Staff #38, LPN was observed administering medication to Resident #5. Following the medication observation, a review of Resident #5's August 2022 MAR (medication administration record) revealed a physician's order for Flonase Suspension (Fluticasone Propionate) 2 sprays in both nostrils one time a day was signed off as given to Resident #5, on 8/12/22 at 9:00 AM, however, the administration of the Flonase was not observed by the surveyor. On 8/12/22 at approximately 2:30 PM, during an interview, Staff #38 stated he/she had administered the Flonase to Resident #5 prior to the med pass observation, he/she then opened the medication cart to show the surveyor the resident's Flonase,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that clean dishes were stored in a manner to prevent contamination. This practice has the potential to affect all residents who consume food provided by the facility kitchen. The findings include: On 7/25/22 at 8:28 AM, surveyor observed several bins containing bowls. The bins were open with no cover. Several of the bowls inside the bins were open side up with visible water pooling in the bottom of the bowl. The kitchen staff (staff # 51) identified these as clean bowls. He was alerted to the water at the bottom of the bowls. He removed the bowls that contained water. He stated that the clean dish bin should not be this close to washing area. He then closed the lid to the bin. The practice of storing dishes prior to being completely air dried is known as wet nesting. Wet nesting creates conditions in which microorganisms can grow. During an Interview with Kitchen staff #51 on 7/25/22 at 8:30 AM, he stated that the dishes are dried in the dishwasher. The dried dishes are stored in the clean area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-23 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program plan and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a facility specific QAPI plan. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all of the residents. The findings include: As part of the initial entrance conference conducted with the Administrator on 7/25/22, a copy of the facility's QAPI plan was requested. A QAPI plan is the written plan containing the process that will guide the nursing home's efforts in assuring care and services are maintained at acceptable levels of performance and continually improve. The plan should describe how the facility will conduct its required QAPI committee functions. The QAPI plan must describe in detail the scope of the QA committee's responsibilities and activities, and the process addressing how the committee will conduct the activities necessary to identify and correct quality deficiencies. Review of the QAPI Program documentation revealed the following under Implementation: 1. The QAPI Committee oversees implementation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to invite residents and/or their representative for interdisciplinary care conferences (an interdisciplinary team is made of the attending physician, a registered nurse with responsibility for the resident, a nurse aide with responsibility for the resident, a member of food and nutrition services staff, the resident and the resident's representative if practicable) to review and revise residents' care plan after each assessment. This finding was evident for 4 of 34 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident #17, #39, #88, #126). The findings include: MDS (Minimum Data Set) is part of the U.S. federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare or Medicaid certified nursing homes. Quarterly review assessment is an assessment due no less frequently than every 92 days. 1. On 12-04-19 clinical record review of Resident #88 revealed that they had MDS quarterly review assessments with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 05-22-19, 08-22-19, 09-20-19, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based clinical record review and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide behavioral monitoring and behavioral interventions for 10 of 11 residents selected for review of psychotropic medications (Residents #26, #37, #49, #54, #59, #85, #108, #123, #128, #343). The findings include: 1. On 12-04-19 at 09:50 AM, A review of Resident #108's clinical record revealed the resident was prescribed routine psychotropic medications in August 2019. Further review of the clinical record revealed no documented evidence that non-pharmacological behavioral interventions were attempted by the staff. Furthermore, there was no documented evidence that the facility staff were monitoring the resident's targeted behaviors to assess whether the psychotropic medications were effective or ineffective. On 12-04-19 at 02:30 PM, interview with the Director of Nursing revealed no additional information. 2. On 12-04-19 at 12:29 PM, the review of Resident #26's clinical record revealed that the resident received psychotropic medications at the facility. Further review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide personal privacy and confidentiality of patient information by discarding patient names and medication labels in the common trash. This finding was evident for 4 of 40 sampled residents (Residents #30, 35, 104, and 109) and on 2 of 5 medication carts reviewed for medication storage and labeling during the survey (carts #1 and #2) . The findings include: 1. On 12-05-19 at 11:35 AM, surveyor observation of 1 [NAME] unit's medication cart (cart #1) revealed medication labels with the names of residents #30 and #35 in the common trash. On 12-05-19 at 11:35 AM surveyor interview with the 1 [NAME] Unit Manager revealed it is the facility's protocol to discard medication labels with patient information in the secured shredder box. On 12-05-19 at 1:00 PM, interview with the Director of Nursing revealed no new information. 2. On 12-05-19 at 11:50 AM, surveyor observation of the 2 [NAME] unit's medication cart (cart #2) for rooms 265-277 revealed medication labels with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to identify discharge plans in the comprehensive care plan. This finding was evident for 4 of 34 (#39, #75, #127, and #242) residents selected for review during the survey. The findings include: 1. On 12-05-19 at 1:00 PM, the review of Resident #242's clinical record revealed he/she was admitted to the facility in November 2019. There was no evidence that a care plan to address the resident's discharge plan was developed. On 12-05-19 at 2:00 PM, interview with the Director of Nursing revealed no additional information. 2. On 12-05-19 at 1:30 PM, a review of Resident #75's clinical record revealed he/she was admitted to the facility in July 2019. There was no evidence that a care plan to address the resident's discharge plan was developed. On 12-05-19 at 2:00 PM, interview with the Director of Nursing revealed no additional information. 3. On 12-05-19 at 1:45 PM, surveyor review of resident #127's clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and interviews with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders for 2 of 34 residents reviewed during the survey (Residents #192 and #442). The findings include: 1. On 12-03-19, clinical record review revealed that Resident #192 was admitted to the facility with multiple wounds. A review of the physician's orders for the resident revealed an order for barrier cream to be applied to the area of moisture associated skin damage (MASD). MASD is inflammation or skin erosion caused by prolonged exposure to a source of moisture such as urine, stool, sweat, wound drainage, saliva, or mucus. Further review of the clinical record revealed Resident #192 had an initial wound evaluation and treatment on 11-27-19 by a wound physician. After evaluation, the wound physician ordered that Silver Sulfadiazine be applied on Resident #192's area of MASD twice daily. He had also ordered to float (off load) Resident #192's heels in bed. However, as of 12-04-19 there was no documented evidence that the facility staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-09 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of a clinical record and interviews with a resident and with the facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to refer 1 of 1 residents, selected for communication-sensory review for, services (Residents #126). The findings include: On 12-03-19 at 9:47 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident #126. The resident was alert and oriented at the time of the interview. The surveyor was informed that the resident had poor vision and it was getting worse. The resident revealed that the facility was informed but noted that no follow up or information concerning an appointment was provided to the resident. On 12-04-19 a review of Resident #126's clinical record revealed a care plan for impaired visual function related to glaucoma, initiated on 03-25-19. On 12-04-19 at 3:30 PM, surveyor interview with the 2 [NAME] Unit Manager revealed that she was familiar with the needs of Resident #126 to be seen for a vision assessment. She stated We talked about it. Resident #126 is on the list for appointments. We recently made a change to vendors, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to document a resident's negative medical change leaving the clinical record incomplete. This finding was evident for 1 of 34 residents selected for review during the survey (Resident #126). The findings include: On 12-06-19, surveyor review of the clinical record for Resident #126 revealed diagnoses that included but were not limited to Parkinson's Disease, dementia, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, brief psychotic disorder and adjustment disorder with depressed mood. The resident was routinely seen by the facility's attending physician, a facility nurse practitioner, a psychiatrist, and a psychiatric nurse practitioner. Further review of Resident #126's record revealed that on 05-23-19, the psychiatrist added a physician certification of incapacity to make informed decisions form to Resident #126's record, declaring that the resident was incapable of making an informed decision for treatment(s) based on the condition of Parkinson's Disease and dementia.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on administrative record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and revise the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) policies and procedures annually. In addition, the facility staff also failed to put the date changed on oxygen tubing and nebulizer tubing (Nebulizer tubing is an essential accessory that connects nebulizer kit to nebulizer compressor) and store them to prevent possible infection. This finding was evident for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #442, Resident #34). The findings include: 1. On 12-09-19 administrative record review revealed that the facility staff reviewed and revised IPCP policies and procedures on 05-09-18. Per federal regulation, the facility staff must have reviewed and revised the IPCP policies and procedures on 05-09-19. However, there was no evidence that it was done annually. On 12-09-19 at 09:12 AM, interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) revealed no additional information. 2a. On 12-02-19 at 9:35 AM surveyor observation revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and surveyor interview, it was determined that the facility failed to administer influenza and pneumococcal immunizations and to provide education regarding benefits and potential side effects of each vaccination. This was evident for 2 of 7 residents selected for review of immunizations during this survey ( Residents #54 and #85). The findings include: 1. On 12-06-19 at 10:38 AM, surveyor review of Resident #54's clinical record revealed they did not receive the influenza immunization. There was no evidence that facility staff offered the influenza immunization to the resident. On 12-06-19 at 12:49 PM, interview with Staff #5 revealed that she did not know why Resident#54 had not received the Influenza immunization. On 12-09-19 at 09:35 AM interview with Director of Nursing (DON) revealed no further information. 2. On 12-06-19 at 12:49 PM, surveyor review of Resident #85's clinical record revealed they did not receive the pneumococcal immunization Resident #85's clinical record indicated the physician had placed an order on 10-14-19. However, there was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-09 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation and interviews with residents and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's bed was in safe operating condition (Resident #242). This finding was evident for 1 of 93 rooms observed during the survey. The findings include: On 12-02-19 at 11 AM, surveyor observation of Resident #242's bed revealed the bed controller cord was frayed. On 12-02-19 at 11:05 AM, interview with Resident #242 revealed the bed controller intermittently worked and they reported the malfunctioning equipment to the staff last week but nothing had been done. On 12-02-19 at 02:55 PM, interview with the administrator revealed no new information.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-08-08 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and facility staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to post a notice of the availability of survey results in a prominent, publicly accessible location. This was evident for all residents and visitors of the facility.The findings include:During this annual survey from 7/31/25 to 8/8/25, surveyors noted that no state inspection results or notices were found in the lobby or other public areas. A tour of the facility confirmed no signs were posted directing residents and visitors to the location of these results.On 8/07/25 around 11 AM, a group interview with seven residents (Resident #3, #13, #23, #31, #34, #66, and #135) revealed that none were aware of their right to review survey results or that the results should be publicly accessible. They also did not know where the results were located.At 11:33 AM on 8/07/25, two surveyors observed no signage for the survey binder at the reception desk. Staff #45 (receptionist) produced the binder from a location behind the desk, out of public view. When asked about other locations, the staff member was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 86 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avalon Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHamilton, NJ 1 of 5Bay Harbor Post Acute Healthcare CenterSalisbury, MD 1 of 5Blueberry Hill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CtrBeverly, MA 1 of 5Canterbury Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5Cape Cod Post Acute CareBrewster, MA 1 of 5Crest Pointe Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterPt Pleasant, NJ 1 of 5Highland Park Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterChelsea, MA 1 of 5Mount Holly Rehabilitation & Healthcare CenterLumberton, NJ 1 of 5Nashua Post Acute CareNashua, NH 2 of 5Arbor Ridge Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWayne, NJ 2 of 5Atlantic View Post AcuteNewport News, VA 2 of 5Bayview Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterNorth Kingstown, RI 2 of 5Elmhurst Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterProvidence, RI 2 of 5Graduate Post AcutePhiladelphia, PA 2 of 5Heritage Hills Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSmithfield, RI 2 of 5Laurel Brook Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMount Laurel, NJ 2 of 5Lawrence Rehab & Hcc/The Meadows At LawrenceLawrenceville, NJ 2 of 5Lawrence Rehabilitation HospitalLawrenceville, NJ 2 of 5Lighthouse Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRevere, MA 2 of 5Lincolnwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterNorth Providence, RI 2 of 5North End Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterBoston, MA 2 of 5Orchard Hill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Palm Springs Post AcuteChelmsford, MA 2 of 5Riverview Healthcare CommunityCoventry, RI 2 of 5Roosevelt Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterPhiladelphia, PA 2 of 5Southampton Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5Springfield Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterSpringfield, PA 2 of 5West Chester Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWest Chester, PA 2 of 5Westgate Hills Rehab & Healthcare CtrBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Willow Brook Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWilmington, MA 2 of 5YORK Post AcuteYorktown, VA 3 of 5Alexandria Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 3 of 5Aspen Hill Rehabiliation & Healthcare CenterHaverhill, MA 3 of 5Belmont Bay Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWoodbridge, VA 3 of 5Brighton Post Acute CareBrighton, MA 3 of 5Cambridge Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMoorestown, NJ 3 of 5Capitol Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHarrisburg, PA 3 of 5Chelsea Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterGoochland, VA 3 of 5Exton Post AcuteExton, PA 3 of 5Hampden Post AcuteWilbraham, MA

Showing 40 of 86; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SKILLED VENTURE LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/31/2021
MANUFACTURERS & TRADERS TRUST COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 01/01/2019
EL BEY, TITANIAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2024
GUNTHORPE, JAHIRIIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/09/2024
POSEN, MINDEEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2019
LIVE WELL PLUS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/04/2025
MARQUIS LIMITED LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
RELIANT PRO REHAB LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/17/2019
BAO, TRUONGIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2019
COLLINGSWOOD PROPERTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2019
NFR 2020 IRRV TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2021
QUINTO HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
RSBRMK HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2021
SK 2013 DELTA TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2021
SORA KOHN FAM TR UAD 120120OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2021
TRYKO HOLDINGS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
UAK 2020 IRRV TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2021
UKR CONSULTING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
YR 2013 DELTA TR UA 03252013OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$23.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$5.3M
Related-party expense22% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 58%Medicare 21%Other / private 22%

This home reported $5.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$441per resident / day
operating cost
$13,395per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$426per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215092. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next