No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lincolnwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

610 Smithfield Road, North Providence, RI 02904 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 200 certified beds · (401) 353-6300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 20242 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)2 actual-harm citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$70,731 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 3 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $70,731 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-21)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1830 Mineral Spring Ave · (401) 351-1900 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1919 Mineral Spring Ave · (401) 353-2501 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1789 Smith St · (401) 353-1111 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2 Gov Notte Pkwy · (401) 719-1633 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.2%19.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.3%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%0.9%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.8%2.5%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms54.9%17.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%3.6%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.1%16.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.9%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.1%95.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.3%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.7%22.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.3%22.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%2.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.6%78.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.8%24.3%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.2%14.6%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.341.591.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.351.681.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 196 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
60.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 60.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 92 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.2%CMS range 51.2–64.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.4%CMS range 6.8–12.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge60.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge46.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 3.9–9.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
0.66
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.32
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.39
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.18
RN hoursweekends
35.1%
Total nursing turnover
35.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 177.9 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-19)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

51 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who received Dilantin (a medication prescribed to treat seizures) in error on 18 occasions without a diagnosis of a seizure disorder, instead of receiving the intended medication, Diltiazem (a medication prescribed to treat high blood pressure) which was not transcribed. Additionally, the resident was transferred to the hospital where s/he received emergent hemodialysis (a medical treatment to remove waste and excess fluids that the kidneys are unable to perform this function adequately) for the Dilantin use, Resident ID #1.Findings are as follows:Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on [DATE] alleges that Resident ID #1 was administered the medication Dilantin instead of the prescribed medication Diltiazem for his/her heart condition after recovering from a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-07-18 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's physician completed a medication reconciliation upon admission, failing to identify a medication transcription error, resulting in the resident receiving Dilantin (a medication prescribed to treat seizures) in error on 18 occasions without a diagnosis of a seizure disorder, instead of receiving the intended medication, Diltiazem (a medication prescribed to treat high blood pressure) which was not transcribed. Additionally, the resident was transferred to the hospital where s/he received emergent hemodialysis (a medical treatment to remove waste and excess fluids that the kidneys are unable to perform this function adequately) for the Dilantin use, Resident ID #1.Findings are as follows:Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on [DATE] alleges that Resident ID #1 was administered the medication Dilantin, instead of the prescribed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-25 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to reconcile all pre-discharge medications with the resident's post-discharge medications, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed who were discharged from the facility, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint received by the Rhode Island Department of Health on 11/19/2024, alleges that Resident ID #1 was discharged home with Resident ID #2's medications. This resulted in one of the medications being taken by Resident ID #1 on two separate dates following his/her discharge. Record review for Resident ID #1 revealed s/he was admitted to the facility in October of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, liver cell carcinoma, end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis (a procedure that removes waste and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys are no longer functioning properly). Further review revealed the resident was discharged to his/her home on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who sustained a fall from an improperly secured mechanical lift (hoyer lift) which resulted in broken bones, hospitalization, and surgical intervention, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 4/16/2025 revealed the resident was being transferred with a mechanical lift and s/he started to slide out of the sling that was attached to the mechanical lift. The resident's leg hit the mechanical lift, and s/he was transferred to an acute care hospital and diagnosed with a left femur fracture (broken thigh bone). Review of a facility policy titled, Lifting Machine, using a Mechanical states in part, Attach sling straps to sling bar, according to manufacturer's instructions. Make sure the sling is securely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents environment remains free of accident hazards relative to falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of a community reported compliant submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 10/14/2024 revealed that the resident had a witnessed fall in his/her room and was transferred to the hospital via 911 with head lacerations. Record review revealed that the resident was readmitted to the facility in October of 2024 with a diagnosis including, but is not limited to, dementia. Review of the Fall Risk Evaluation, dated 10/8/2024, revealed the resident is at high risk for falls. Review of a Functional Abilities & Goals (Admission) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident is dependent on staff for rolling to the left and right. It further revealed an intervention which included, but is not limited to, the resident is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that all residents are free from significant medication errors relative to the administration of medications to the incorrect resident, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #5. Findings are as follows: Review of a community reported complaint received by the Rhode Island Department of Health on 8/21/2024 alleged that Resident ID #5 received another resident's medications on 8/13/2024. Record review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in August of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, pneumonia and abnormal weight loss. Review of a progress note dated 8/9/2024 revealed the resident received his/her roommates' medications and it was reported to the nurse practitioner with new orders to monitor the resident for low blood pressure. Review of a facility document titled Full QA Report dated 8/9/2024, states in part, .received roommates' medication today .nurse did not perform 5 checks .wrong resident . Additionally, the document revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to protect and keep residents free from physical abuse relative to an incident that occurred between Resident ID #1 and Resident ID #2, resulting in significant injury of Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program states in part, Residents have the right to be free from abuse .The .prevention program consists of a facility wide commitment and resource allocation to support the following objectives .Protect residents from abuse .by anyone including .other residents . According to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP - Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities, last revised 02/2023, .Abuse is the willful infliction of injury .with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish .Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain .Willful, as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who are fed through a feeding tube receive the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a gastrojejunostomy tube (G-J tube, a specialized medical device that allows healthcare providers to access both stomach and small intestine through a single physical opening on the outside of the body, by having 2 separate access ports, a G-port to the stomach and a J-port to the small intestine), Resident ID #1.Findings are as follows:Record review of a report titled, Hospital Events Reporting received by the Rhode Island Department of Health on 6/17/2026, alleged that the facility failed to ensure proper maintenance of enteral feeding tubes for Resident #1. Resident #1 had a G-J tube placed on 5/8/2026 and while residing in the facility, the jejunal (J) portion of the tube repeatedly clogged, requiring consecutive replacements on 6/3/2026, 6/8/2026, and 6/13/2026.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation involving an accident resulting in serious injury, which occurred prior to a resident's death, was reported to the appropriate authorities, including the State Survey Agency, as required by State law. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows:Record review of a community-reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on [DATE] alleged that Resident ID #1 sustained a fall with an injury that required hospital transfer on [DATE]. The complaint further alleged that diagnostic imaging at the hospital identified three new rib fractures. Record review revealed that the resident was readmitted to the facility in March of 2026 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, seizures and muscle weakness.Record review revealed the following progress notes:[DATE] at 9:22 AM, authored by the on-call provider, revealed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that positive airway pressure therapy (a mechanical device used to support breathing and maintain airway patency) was provided to a resident in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows:Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in February of 2026 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (a long-term condition where the lungs cannot adequately exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide, resulting in retention of [NAME] dioxide).Record review revealed a physician's order dated 2/10/2026 for use of a CPAP machine ( a continuous positive airway pressure machine, a medical device designed to help individuals maintain consistent breathing while sleeping by keeping the airways open) at bedtime and as needed for naps, with instructions to verify proper placement and function, and to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-19 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient food and nutrition service support personnel possessed the appropriate competencies and skill sets to safely carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that the cooks who were in charge during meal preparation and service obtained the required Food Manager's Certification, as required, to ensure safe food handling practices and resident safety. Findings are as follows:Record review of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Food Code, 2022 Edition, Section 2-102.11 Demonstration, states in part, .the person in charge shall demonstrate knowledge by.(B) Being a certified FOOD protection manager who has shown proficiency of required information through passing a test that is part of an ACCREDITED PROGRAM.During the initial tour of the main kitchen on 3/15/2026 at approximately 8:11 AM, Cook, Staff J, revealed that he was the staff member in charge of food service that morning. During a surveyor interview on 3/15/2026 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0924 — pattern
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the hallway handrails in a safe operating condition for 3 of 4 units observed. Findings are as follows:During a surveyor observation on 3/17/2026 at approximately 12:54PM, revealed the wall railing to the left of room [ROOM NUMBER] was noted to move slightly when this surveyor leaned against the wall. Further observation of the railing revealed that the right side of that railing was not secured to the wall. Additional surveyor observations on 3/18/2026 at approximately 9:30 AM, revealed that the hallway handrails were in disrepair and were becoming detached from the wall in the following locations:Second floor by stairwell ASecond floor south unit by the storage roomSecond floor north unit by resident room [ROOM NUMBER]Second floor north unit by resident room [ROOM NUMBER]Third floor north unit by the elevatorThird floor north unit by resident room [ROOM NUMBER]Third floor north unit by resident room [ROOM NUMBER]During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that each resident was treated with respect and dignity for 1 of 2 residents reviewed, in relation to a dressing change, Resident ID #4. Findings are as follows:Record review of a facility policy titled Resident Rights Guidelines for All Nursing Procedures last revised in October of 2010, states in part, .1. For any procedure that involves direct resident care, follow these steps.Close the room entrance door and provide for the resident's privacy.Record review revealed a physician's order dated 3/15/2026 to clean the wound to his/her coccyx (tailbone) and apply a treatment daily and as needed.During a surveyor observation of a dressing change on 3/18/2026 at approximately 10:00 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Staff A, was observed entering and exiting the room while preparing wound care supplies at the resident's bedside table. Staff A failed to provide privacy, as the privacy curtain was not drawn and the door to the resident's room was left open. The resident was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents with pressure ulcers (localized damage to the skin and underlying tissues caused by constant pressure on an area over a long period of time) receive necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 2 of 5 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 17 and 31.Findings are as follows:According to Lippincott Nursing Center Procedure titled Wound Assessment, Management, and Documentation dated October 2022, states in part, .The initial assessment should be completed when the wound is first observed. Follow-up assessments should be completed at least weekly.the physician will help identify medical interventions related to wound management .Review of a facility policy titled Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown-Clinical Protocol with a revision date of 2014, states in part, .In addition, the nurse shall describe and document/report the following: a full assessment of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 3 residents reviewed related to a BiPAP machine (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure - a noninvasive ventilator machine prescribed to assist breathing by delivering pressurized air through a mask), Resident ID #s 161 and 204.Findings are as follows:Record review of a facility policy titled .BIPAP Support. states in part, .Preparation.3. Review the physician's order to determine the oxygen concentration and flow, and the PEEP pressure [Positive End-Expiratory Pressure - a medical ventilator setting that maintains positive pressure in the lungs at the end of exhalation].for the machine.General Guidelines for Cleaning.4. Machine cleaning: Wipe machine with warm, soapy water and rinse at least once a week and as needed.5. Humidifier (if used):a. Use clean, distilled water only in the humidifier chamber.b. Clean humidifier weekly and air…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections relative to transmission based precautions for 2 of 2 residents reviewed who have a central venous catheter (CVC - a thin, flexible tube that is placed into the large vein above the heart) used for dialysis (a medical treatment that filters waste, toxins, and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys are failing), Resident ID #s 1 and 2.Findings are as follows:Review of the Center for Disease Control (CDC) reference for Health Care Providers dated June 28, 2024, states in part, .Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes. Enhanced Barrier Precautions involve gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with a MDRO as well as those at increased risk of MDRO acquisition (e.g.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide the residents with an environment that remains as free of accident hazards as is possible and that each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 newly admitted resident who started a fire with a lighter, Resident ID # 1. Findings are as follows:Record review of a community reported complaint report submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 12/29/2025 alleges that a resident had ignited their oxygen tubing while using a lighter. Record review revealed that Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in December of 2025 with diagnoses including but not limited to multiple fractures of ribs and a history of falling. Record review of the hospital documentation revealed Resident ID #1 is a smoker. During a surveyor interview with the Regional Director of Clinical Services, the Regional Director of Operations, and the [NAME] President of Operations, on 12/29/2025 at approximately 10:10 AM, they revealed that an incident had occurred…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services being provided meet professional standards of practice relative to following physician's orders for 1 of 2 residents recently admitted to the facility, Resident ID #3. Findings are as follows:Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in June of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis (a medical treatment to remove waste and fluids from the blood when the kidneys do not function properly) and constipation.Record review of the July 2025 admission Minimum Data Set Assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15, indicating the resident is cognitively intact.Record review of the admission Transfer/Discharge Report dated 6/26/2025 revealed an order for Polyethylene Glycol 3350 (Miralax; a medication prescribed to treat constipation) 17 grams (gm) by mouth every 24 hours as needed (PRN) for constipation, hold for loose stools.Record review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis (a medical treatment that removes waste and fluids from the blood when the kidneys do not function properly) receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice relative to following the physician's orders for a fluid restriction and medication administration for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #2. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in July of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis and fluid overload. Record review revealed the resident receives dialysis weekly every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. 1a. Record review revealed a physician's order dated 7/7/2025 for a 1000 milliliter (ml) fluid restriction, indicating to provide the allowed fluid intake per the physician's order and document the total amount consumed every shift. Additionally, the order revealed a breakdown of fluids to include a total…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 out of 5 residents reviewed for droplet precautions, Resident ID #s 5, 29, 106, and 107 and for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line, a long thin tube that is inserted through a vein in the arm and passed through to the larger veins in the heart), Resident ID #416. Findings are as follows: 1a) Record review revealed Resident ID #5 was readmitted to the facility in June of 2024 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, end stage renal disease. Record review revealed a physician's order dated 1/8/2025 for isolation precautions; droplet precautions until 1/15/2025, due to testing positive for Flu A. Review of the signage posted outside of the resident's room from 1/13/2025 through 1/15/2025 revealed the resident was on special contact/droplet precautions which indicated to wear a gown,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to establish an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) that must include, at a minimum, an antibiotic stewardship program which includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use to ensure that residents who require an antibiotic, are prescribed the appropriate antibiotic for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for antibiotic use, Resident ID #s 15, 32, and 53. Findings are as follows: According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) document titled, The Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes states in part, Standardize the practices which should be applied during the care of any resident suspected of an infection or started on an antibiotic. These practices include improving the evaluation and communication of clinical signs and symptoms when a resident is first suspected of having an infection, optimizing the use of diagnostic testing, and implementing an antibiotic review process, also known as an antibiotic time-out, for all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, relative to care of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line, a long thin tube that is inserted through a vein in the arm and passed through to the larger veins in the heart) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a PICC line, Resident ID #416. Findings are as follows: According to Lippincott Nursing Procedures, Ninth Edition page 653, states in part, .Make sure to follow evidence-based infection-prevention techniques, such as performing hand hygiene, using maximal barrier precautions, following sterile technique, and properly preparing the insertion site, to reduce the risk of vascular catheter-associated infections. Review of a facility policy titled, Peripheral and Midline IV [intravenous] Dressing Changes dated March 2022 states in part, .Maintain sterile dressing (transparent semi-permeable membrane [TSM] dressing or sterile gauze) for all peripheral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, relative to following physician orders for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a skin tear, Resident ID #79. Findings are as follows: According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing page 314, states in part, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physicians' orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. Record review revealed Resident ID #79 was readmitted to the facility in September of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, Alzheimer's disease and adult failure to thrive. During a surveyor observation on 1/13/2025 at 9:09 AM, of the resident s/he was observed with a wound dressing to the back of his/her right hand dated 1/7/2025. Further observation revealed the dressing had visible dark soilage underneath. Record review of a physician's order dated 1/7/2025 revealed to cleanse the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with pressure ulcers receive the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who was admitted with a pressure ulcer, Resident ID #415. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed that Resident ID #415 was admitted to the facility in January of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, hemiparesis (one sided muscle weakness because of disruption to the brain or spinal cord) and hemiplegia (total or nearly complete paralysis on one side of the body). Record review of an admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident has a pressure ulcer to his/her coccyx. Further review failed to reveal measurements or a description of the wound to include staging (classifying wounds based on their depth and severity), exudate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for significant weight loss, Resident ID #30. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility policy titled, Weight Assessment and Intervention, with a revision date of March 2022, states in part, .Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment is retaken the next day for confirmation .if the weight is verified, nursing will immediately notify the dietician in writing .The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss will be based on the following criteria .a. 1 month - 5% weight loss is significant; greater than 5% is severe. b 3 months - 7.5% weight loss is significant; greater than 7.5% is severe. c. 6 months - 10% weight loss is significant; greater than 10% is severe .Undesirable weight change is evaluated by the treatment team whether or not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who are fed by a feeding tube receive the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for 1 of 2 residents reviewed who require continuous feeding via a gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a surgically placed device used to give direct access to the stomach for supplemental feeding, hydration or medicine), Resident ID #144. Findings are as follows: Review of a policy titled Enteral Nutrition dated November 2018 states in part, .Risk of aspiration [inhaling a substance into the lungs that may lead to coughing and infection] may be affected by .improper positioning of the resident during feeding . Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in March of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and cognitive communication deficit. Review of a care plan dated 8/30/2024, revealed the resident required enteral tube feeding with a goal to remain free from complications including, but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain the resident's medical record in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a skin tear, Resident ID #79. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed Resident ID #79 was readmitted to the facility in September of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, Alzheimer's disease and adult failure to thrive. During a surveyor observation on 1/13/2025 at 9:09 AM, of the resident s/he was observed with a wound dressing to the back of his/her right hand dated 1/7/2025. Further observation revealed the dressing had visible dark soilage underneath. Record review of a physician's order dated 1/7/2025 revealed to cleanse the wound on the back of the right hand with wound cleanser, skin prep surrounding area and cover with a dry clean dressing daily until resolved. During a surveyor interview on 1/13/2025 at 2:01 PM, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Staff B, she acknowledged that the wound dressing appeared soiled and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services provided by the facility meet professional standards of quality relative to following physician's orders for 1 of 4 residents reviewed, Resident ID #3. Findings are as follows: According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. Record review revealed Resident ID #3 was admitted to the facility in October of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat often causing inadequate blood flow through the heart) and pneumonia. Record review of the hospital Continuity of Care document dated 10/31/2024 revealed a physician's order to start Cefpodoxime (a medication prescribed to treat various infections) 200 milligrams(mg) twice a day for 3 days, with a stop date of 11/3/2024. Record review of the November 2024 Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident receives treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a suprapubic catheter (a medical device that helps drain urine from your bladder into a collection bag outside of your body when you can't urinate on your own), Resident ID #3 and for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with an indwelling foley catheter (a device that drains urine from your urinary bladder into a collection bag outside of your body when you can't urinate on your own), Resident ID #4. Findings are as follows: According to [NAME] CoursePoint Enhanced for Taylor's Fundamentals of Nursing, 9th Edition the following are important nursing measures used to care for patients with an indwelling catheter: .make sure that the patient maintains a generous fluid intake, unless contraindicated by other health concerns. This helps prevent infection and irrigates the catheter naturally by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to immediately inform the resident's representative relative to the decision to transfer a resident to an acute care hospital for one of one resident reviewed, Resident ID #3. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health, dated 9/12/2024 alleges that the resident was transferred to an acute care hospital and his/her family was not notified. Record review revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility in August of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, urinary tract infection, anemia, and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA). Review of a nursing progress note authored by Licensed Practical Nurse, Staff A, revealed that on 8/23/2024 at 9:00 PM the resident was noted to not have any urinary output from his/her suprapubic catheter (a medical device that helps drain urine from your bladder). Additionally, the note indicated that the resident was complaining of abdominal pain so s/he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide written notice of the bed-hold policy to the resident or resident representative, prior to the transfer of the resident to the hospital, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 8/23/2024 alleges that, Resident ID #1 was discharged from the facility to the hospital on 8/8/2024. On 8/16/2024, the hospital case manager was informed by the facility that the resident was a short-term resident (the resident had been residing in the facility for 2 years), and the facility no longer had any available beds. Record review revealed that Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in August of 2022 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, Alzheimer's disease. Review of a Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 00 out of 15,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice relative to following physician orders for obtaining appointments with specialists for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #2. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 8/19/2024 alleges that Resident ID #2 was admitted to the facility in July of 2024 with several follow-up appointments scheduled for August 2024, including a cardiology follow-up appointment. Additionally, the complaint alleges that the facility was aware of these appointments and failed to obtain transportation for the resident to get to his/her appointments. Record review revealed that Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in July of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, heart failure, end stage renal disease and diabetes. Review of a hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate administration of all drugs, relative to chemotherapy medication for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of a community reported complaint received by the Rhode Island Department of Health on 8/13/2024 alleged that Resident ID #1 did not receive the correct dosage of his/her chemotherapy medication. Record review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in June of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, malignant neoplasm of the brain (brain cancer) and bipolar disorder. Review of the July 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that the resident received Temozolomide (chemotherapy agent) 125 milligrams (mg) daily from 7/11 until 7/21/2024. Review of a progress note dated 7/22/2024 authored by Nurse Practitioner (NP), Staff A, revealed the resident was transferred…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that all residents are free from significant medication errors relative to administering the correct dosage and medication in the correct form for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for chemotherapy medication, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: A. Review of a facility policy titled, Reconciliation of Medications on Admission last revised in July 2017 states in part, The purpose of this procedure is to ensure medication safety by accurately accounting for the resident's medications, routes and dosages upon admission or readmission to the facility .Using an approved medication reconciliation form or other record, list all medications from the medication history, the discharge summary, the previous MAR [Medication Administration Record], and the admitting orders .Review the list carefully to determine if there are discrepancies/conflicts. For example: a. The dosage on the discharge summary does not match the dosage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff, and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity was maintained for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #4. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 4/25/2024 revealed that Nursing Assistant (NA), Staff A, allegedly called Resident ID #4 a cripple, while providing care to the resident. Review of a facility policy titled Dignity states in part, .Staff speak respectfully to residents at all times, including addressing the resident by his or her name of choice and not labeling or referring to the resident by his or her .diagnosis, or care needs. Record review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in December of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, myopathy (a condition that affects the muscles connecting to your bones that control voluntary movements in the body), chronic pain syndrome, and anxiety. Record review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored, served and distributed, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, relative to the main kitchen and the South 2 Nursing Unit kitchenette. Findings are as follows: 1. The Rhode Island Food Code 2018 Edition 5-202.13 reads in part, .an airgap between the water supply inlet and the flood level rim of the plumbing fixture equipment .shall be at least twice the diameter of the water supply inlet and may not be less than 25mm (1 inch) . During a surveyor observation on 1/28/2024 during the initial tour of the main kitchen, the ice machine in the dietary department did not have an air gap. During a surveyor observation on 1/28/2024 at approximately 10:00 AM, the ice machine located on the South 2 Nursing Unit kitchenette did not have an air gap. During a surveyor interview on 1/28/2024 at approximately 11:10 AM with the Regional Director of Maintenance, he acknowledged the ice machine for the main kitchen did not have an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-02 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observations and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly relative to 1 of 1 dumpster and the surrounding area. Findings are as follows: During surveyor observations on the following dates and times revealed a recliner, 5 oxygen concentrators, multiple white trash bags, empty cigarette cartons, and broken cardboard boxes surrounding the outside of the dumpster: - 1/31/2024 at approximately 2:00 PM - 2/1/2024 at approximately 2:30 PM - 2/2/2024 at approximately 2:30 PM Additionally, an uncovered Rubbermaid tilt truck (a utility cart that can be dumped by one person) was observed overflowing with disposable gloves and Styrofoam cups sitting atop ice in the truck. During a surveyor interview on 2/2/2024 at approximately 2:45 PM with the Regional Director of Maintenance, he acknowledged the dumpster area was in need of cleaning.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice relative to the assessment of the resident before dialysis treatments and ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility for 3 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 75, 157, and 381. Findings are as follows: Review of the State Operations Manual Appendix PP-Guidance for Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities revised 2/3/2023 states in part, .the facility assures that each resident receives ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before .dialysis treatments received at a certified dialysis facility .Ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility . Review of the facility policy titled, End-Stage Renal Disease, Care of a Resident with, states in part, .Agreements between this facility and the contracted ESRD [end stage renal disease] facility include .how information will be exchanged between…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 3 resident's reviewed for Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDRO), Resident ID #s 6 and 170. Findings are as follows: Review of the CDC's (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) document titled, Multidrug-resistant organisms management states in part, .For ill residents (e.g., those totally dependent upon healthcare personnel for healthcare and activities of daily living .use Contact Precautions [use of gown and gloves when entering a resident's room] in addition to Standard Precautions .For MDRO colonized or infected patients without draining wounds, diarrhea, or uncontrolled secretions, establish ranges of permitted ambulation, socialization, and use of common areas based on their risk to other patients and on the ability of the colonized or infected patients . Review of the CDC's document titled, Infection Control . states in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from neglect for 1 of 2 residents reviewed, Resident ID #236. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility reported incident submitted the Rhode Island Department of Health on 1/25/2024 indicated that Resident ID # 236 stated that his/her call light was removed and put out of reach, and the Nursing Assistant (NA), (later identified as Staff A) acknowledged removing the call light from the resident's reach. Record review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in January of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, acute respiratory failure, end stage renal disease requiring dialysis, gastrostomy status (tube feeding), cognitive communication deficit, and insomnia. Record review of a care plan initiated on 1/23/2024 revealed a focus area for activities of daily living with an intervention in place to encourage the use of the call bell for assistance. Additional review revealed interventions in place for anti-anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 2 residents reviewed with foley catheters relative to a urinary tract infection (UTI), Resident ID #170. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled, Catheter Care, Urinary states in part, .The purpose of this procedure is to prevent urinary catheter-associated complications, including urinary tract infections .observe the resident's urine level for noticeable increases or decreases .follow the facility procedure for measuring and documenting input and output . Record review revealed Resident ID #170 was admitted to the facility in December of 2023 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of a Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of the care plan revealed a focus area dated 12/6/2023 indicating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are accurately documented for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for as needed (PRN) medication for blood pressure, Resident ID #157; and for 1 of 2 residents with foley catheters reviewed for antibiotic treatment for urinary tract infections (UTI), Resident ID #170. Findings are as follows: According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow the physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. Review of a facility policy titled, Administering Medications states in part, .Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders . 1) Record review revealed Resident ID #157 was admitted to the facility in July of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, end stage renal disease and hypotension (low blood pressure, generally a blood pressure reading lower than 90 millimeters of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents are free from significant medication errors for 4 of 6 resident's reviewed for medication administration, Resident ID #s 4, 2, 1, and 3. Findings are as follows: Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 1/11/2024 alleges in part that residents do not receive their medications on time. 1a. Record review revealed that Resident ID #4 was admitted to the facility in August of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, vascular dementia and atrial fibrillation (irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm that can lead to blood clots, stroke, heart failure and other complications). Record review revealed the resident attended a dermatology appointment on 12/6/2024 related to scabies and was ordered the following medications: -Ivermectin 3 milligrams (MG) by mouth, take 5 tablets today and repeat in 2 weeks. -Permethrin 5% topical cream, apply to the entire body neck down to feet overnight for 8 hours, wash off…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive proper treatment and care to maintain mobility and good foot health, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed, Resident ID #4. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint received by the Rhode Island Department of Health on 1/17/2024, alleges, concerns with Resident ID #4 not being seen by the podiatrist. According to the State Operations Manual Appendix PP - Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities last revised 2/3/2023 states in part, .Facilities are responsible for providing the necessary treatment and foot care to residents. Treatment also includes preventive care to avoid podiatric complications in residents with diabetes and circulatory disorders who are prone to developing foot problems. Foot care that is provided in the facility, such as toe nail clipping for residents without complicating disease processes, should be provided by staff who have received education and training to provide this service. Foot care and treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive routine dental services for 1 of 2 residents reviewed, Resident ID #4. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint received by the Rhode Island Department of Health on 1/17/2024, alleges, concerns with Resident ID #4 being seen by the dentist. According to the State Operations Manual Appendix PP - Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities last revised 2/3/2023 states in part, .Routine dental services .means an annual [yearly] inspection of the oral cavity for signs of disease, diagnosis of dental disease, dental radiographs as needed, dental cleaning, fillings (new and repairs), minor partial or full denture adjustments, smoothing of broken teeth, and limited prosthodontic procedures, e.g., taking impressions for dentures and fitting dentures . Record review revealed that Resident ID #4 was admitted to the facility in August of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, vascular dementia and atrial fibrillation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment relative to cold water temperatures in shower rooms and resident room sinks for 2 of 2 floors observed. Findings are as follows: Record review of two anonymous community reported complaints submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 12/12/2023, alleged that there is no hot water in the facility and residents are being bathed with cold water. During surveyor observations on 12/13/2023 of the 1st floor shower room and resident room sinks revealed the following: - 10:40 AM, the shower room's first shower stall's water had a temperature reading of 92.0 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and a second shower stall had a water temperature reading of 91.7 degrees F - 10:45 AM, resident room [ROOM NUMBER], had a sink water temperature reading of 94.3 degrees F - 10:50 AM, resident room [ROOM NUMBER], had a sink water temperature reading of 91.9…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 1 resident who has an actual pressure injury (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence), Resident ID #2. Findings are as follows: Review of The State Operations Manual Appendix PP-Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities, last revised on 2/3/2023, states in part, .Assessment and Treatment of Pressure Ulcer [PU]/Injury[PI] It is important that each existing PU/PI be identified, whether present on admission or developed after admission .the potential for development of additional PU/PIs or the deterioration of the PU/PIs be recognized, assessed and addressed .When assessing the PU/PI itself, it is important that documentation addresses: -The type of injury (pressure-related versus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide fluids and medications prepared in a form designed to meet the individual needs of the resident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who was ordered pudding thick consistency liquids, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of a community reported complaint allegation submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 10/25/2023 states in part, .the rn [Registered Nurse] just gave pt [patient, Resident ID #1] pills and water and walked away. Per this pts health records, [s/he] needs to have all fluids thickened . 1a) Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in October of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, Parkinson's disease (a neurological disorder) and dysphagia (a condition with difficulty swallowing food or liquid). Review of a physician's diet order dated 10/12/2023 revealed in part, pureed texture, and pudding consistency liquids. Review of a care plan initiated on 10/12/2023 states in part, I have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice relative to following physician's orders for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with an ileostomy (a surgical procedure that brings one end of the intestine out through an opening or stoma made in the abdominal wall for stool elimination into a colostomy bag), Resident ID #3. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 8/15/2023 alleges that the complainant is concerned for the overall care provided by the facility. Record review revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility in February of 2023 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, volvulus (a condition when a loop of intestine twists around itself and causing a bowel obstruction). Record review of an admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident is offered a therapeutic diet when there is a nutritional problem and the health care provider orders a therapeutic diet for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for fluid restrictions, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 8/15/2023 alleges a concern regarding the resident's overall quality of care at the facility. Record review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in August of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic kidney disease and arteriosclerotic heart disease (a condition where the arteries become narrowed and hardened due to fat buildup in the artery wall). Record review of an admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors for 1 of 2 residents reviewed who missed a dose of a prescribed antibiotic medication, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 8/15/2023 alleges in part, .concerned about the overall care .and that [his/her] infection will worsen . Record review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital in August of 2023, with diagnoses including, but not limited to, sepsis (also referred to as blood poisoning, a potentially life-threatening condition that arises when the body's response to an infection causes injury to its own tissues and organs) and cellulitis (a bacterial infection involving the inner layers of the skin). Record review revealed a physician's order with a start date of 8/12/2023 for cephalexin (antibiotic medication) 250 milligrams (mg), two capsules to be administered by mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$70,731 in federal fines across 6 penalties.

  • $12,425 — penalty dated 2025-04-21
  • $12,038 — penalty dated 2024-11-25
  • $12,035 — penalty dated 2024-10-17
  • $12,035 — penalty dated 2024-08-15
  • $12,035 — penalty dated 2024-06-27
  • $10,163 — penalty dated 2023-12-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 86 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avalon Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHamilton, NJ 1 of 5Bay Harbor Post Acute Healthcare CenterSalisbury, MD 1 of 5Blueberry Hill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CtrBeverly, MA 1 of 5Canterbury Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5Cape Cod Post Acute CareBrewster, MA 1 of 5Crest Pointe Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterPt Pleasant, NJ 1 of 5Highland Park Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterChelsea, MA 1 of 5Mount Holly Rehabilitation & Healthcare CenterLumberton, NJ 1 of 5Nashua Post Acute CareNashua, NH 2 of 5Arbor Ridge Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWayne, NJ 2 of 5Atlantic View Post AcuteNewport News, VA 2 of 5Bayview Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterNorth Kingstown, RI 2 of 5Collingswood Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRockville, MD 2 of 5Elmhurst Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterProvidence, RI 2 of 5Graduate Post AcutePhiladelphia, PA 2 of 5Heritage Hills Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSmithfield, RI 2 of 5Laurel Brook Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMount Laurel, NJ 2 of 5Lawrence Rehab & Hcc/The Meadows At LawrenceLawrenceville, NJ 2 of 5Lawrence Rehabilitation HospitalLawrenceville, NJ 2 of 5Lighthouse Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRevere, MA 2 of 5North End Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterBoston, MA 2 of 5Orchard Hill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Palm Springs Post AcuteChelmsford, MA 2 of 5Riverview Healthcare CommunityCoventry, RI 2 of 5Roosevelt Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterPhiladelphia, PA 2 of 5Southampton Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5Springfield Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterSpringfield, PA 2 of 5West Chester Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWest Chester, PA 2 of 5Westgate Hills Rehab & Healthcare CtrBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Willow Brook Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWilmington, MA 2 of 5YORK Post AcuteYorktown, VA 3 of 5Alexandria Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 3 of 5Aspen Hill Rehabiliation & Healthcare CenterHaverhill, MA 3 of 5Belmont Bay Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWoodbridge, VA 3 of 5Brighton Post Acute CareBrighton, MA 3 of 5Cambridge Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMoorestown, NJ 3 of 5Capitol Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHarrisburg, PA 3 of 5Chelsea Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterGoochland, VA 3 of 5Exton Post AcuteExton, PA 3 of 5Hampden Post AcuteWilbraham, MA

Showing 40 of 86; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SKILLED VENTURE LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/08/2021
ISRAEL DISCOUNT BANK OF NEW YORK - IDB BANK OF YORKOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 03/08/2021
ARNETT, BENAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/03/2023
HARMAN, DINAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/08/2021
STEVENS, JOELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/26/2024
VIROJA, YOGESHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/08/2021
POSEN, MINDEEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/08/2021
MARQUIS LIMITED LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/08/2021
NUTRACO LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/24/2025
RELIANT PRO REHAB LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/08/2021
DASARI, NARESHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/08/2021
LINCOLNWOOD PROPERTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/08/2021
NFR 2020 IRRV TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2021
QUINTO NEXGEN LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2021
RSBRMK HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2021
SK NEXGEN TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2021
TRYKO NEXGEN HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2021
UAK 2020 IRRV TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2021
UKR NEXGEN LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2021
YK NEXGEN TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2021
YR NEXGEN TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$23.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$4.3M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 9%Other / private 20%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$358per resident / day
operating cost
$10,873per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$364per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in RI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Rhode Island Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Rhode Island
$12,106/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,383/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,781/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 415035. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next