Chelsea Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 91 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 97.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 81.4 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.77 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.25 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to protect a resident from abuse by another resident, resulting in harm, a fractured wrist, for one of 32 residents in the survey sample, Residents #32 and #16. The findings include: The facility synopsis of the event, dated, 3/22/24, documented, Resident to Resident, separated, abut policy initiated. Residents involved: (Resident #32 and Resident #16). The facility synopsis of the event, dated 3/29/24, documented in part, (R32) was in the dining room on the evening of March 22nd around 5:10 p.m. He was watching a program in the dining room, as he often does. When (R16) came into the dining room, he changed the TV channel without first, communicating with (R32). This upset (R32). (R32) stood and aggressively approached (R16), who then pushed (R32); (R32) lost his footing due to the push and fell to the ground attempting to catch himself with his right arm. Resident (R32) sent out for evaluation following complaints of pain in the right wrist and with bruising…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the provider of a resident's change in condition in a timely manner for one of seven residents in the survey sample, Resident #1. The findings include: For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed to notify the physician in a timely manner of neurological status changes after a fall. A review of R1's clinical record revealed the following progress notes: 3/31/24 at 7:50 p.m. Falls/Trauma .Altered level of consciousness .Patient initial evaluation post fall stable VS (vital signs) WNL (within normal limits). Patient c/o (complained of) pain to left side of head in area of hematoma. Neuro (neurological check) #4 pupils unequal, non-reactive. Patient not following commands appropriately, c/o being nauseated. Recommend sending to ER (emergency room). 3/31/24 at 10:15 p.m. Made aware by CNA (certified nursing assistant) at approximately 1950 (7:50 p.m.) that resident was found on the floor. Went to assess resident. Resident was observed laying (sic) on the floor on her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop an accurate baseline care plan for one of seven residents in the survey sample, Resident #1. The findings include: For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed to include the risks of taking anticoagulants on the baseline care plan. A review of R1's clinical record revealed the following provider's orders on admission: 3/28/24 Aspirin Oral Tablet Chewable 81 MG (milligrams) (Aspirin) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day. 3/28/24 Apixaban (Eliquis) (1) 2.5 mg Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. On 12/9/24 at 2:39 p.m., RN (registered nurse) #1 was interviewed. She stated she believed the admission nursing assessment is the beginning of the resident's baseline care plan, but other information to complete the baseline care plan should probably be included. When asked if a resident's taking both Aspirin and Eliquis as blood thinners should be on a resident's baseline care plan, she stated that it should. She stated these two medications increase a resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to respond to a resident's change in condition in a timely manner for one of seven residents in the survey sample, Resident #1. The findings include: For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed to respond to her neurological status changes after a fall. A review of R1's clinical record revealed the following progress notes: 3/31/24 at 7:50 p.m. Falls/Trauma .Altered level of consciousness .Patient initial evaluation post fall stable VS (vital signs) WNL (within normal limits). Patient c/o (complained of) pain to left side of head in area of hematoma. Neuro (neurological check) #4 pupils unequal, non-reactive. Patient not following commands appropriately, c/o being nauseated. Recommend sending to ER (emergency room). 3/31/24 at 10:15 p.m. Made aware by CNA (certified nursing assistant) at approximately 1950 (7:50 p.m.) that resident was found on the floor. Went to assess resident. Resident was observed laying (sic) on the floor on her left side. Resident noted to have large…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of care for one of 32 residents in the survey sample, Resident #19. The findings include: 1.a. For Resident #19 (R19), the facility staff failed to document progress notes in a timely manner A review of R19's clinical record revealed three progress notes related to R19 with an effective date between two to four days prior to when the note was actually written. These notes were: On 8/26/24, LPN (licensed practical nurse) #2 wrote a note about what she observed and assessed on 8/22/24. She documented this as a Late Entry. On 8/26/24, RN (registered nurse) #1 wrote a note about what she observed and assessed on 8/23/24. She documented this as a Late Entry. On 8/26/24 at 1:35 p.m., ASM (administrative staff member) #2, the director of nursing, wrote a note about R19 being sent to the emergency room on 8/24/24. The effective date of this note was 8/24/24 at 9:00 p.m. She documented this as a Late Entry. On 9/10/24 at 9:53 a.m., LPN #2 was interviewed.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  2. For Resident #74, the facility staff failed to maintain dignity of the resident while doing a dressing change. Observation was made on 9/10/24 at 12:15 p.m. of LPN (licensed practical nurse) #2, the wound care nurse administering a treatment for Resident #74 on his buttock. The physician order dated, 8/22/24, documented, Right Buttock: Cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply silver alginate, border gauze, every day shift for wound care. LPN #2 performed the dressing change as ordered. At the end of the dressing change, LPN #2 took her black marker out of her pocket and wrote on the dressing after the dressing, border gauze, had been applied to the resident's buttock. An interview was conducted with LPN #2 on 9/10/24 at 3:53 p.m. The dressing change was discussed with LPN #2. LPN #2 stated immediately that she wrote her date and initials on the dressing while the dressing was on the resident's buttock. She stated she normally writes on the dressing before she begins her treatments but got distracted with the new wound care provider that morning. When asked why we don't write…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to accommodate a resident's needs for one of 32 residents in the survey sample, Resident #72. The findings include: For Resident #72 (R72), the facility staff failed to maintain the resident's call bell within the resident's reach. On 9/9/24 at 7:11 p.m., an observation of R72 lying in bed was conducted. R72 asked where his call bell was and stated he needed it in case he needed something. R72's call bell was observed lying on the floor beside the resident's roommate's bed and was not within R72's reach. There was no clip on the cord so the call bell could not be attached to the resident's bed sheets. On 9/10/24 at 4:09 p.m., an interview was conducted with RN (registered nurse) #2. RN #2 stated staff should clip call bells to residents' bed sheets and ensure call bells are within residents' reach when they round every hour or two hours. On 9/10/24 at 4:39 p.m., ASM (administrative staff member) #1 (the administrator) and ASM #2 (the director of nursing) were made aware…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to evidence that written notification of a hospital transfer was provided to the resident representative for one of 32 residents in the survey sample; Resident #28. The findings include: For Resident #28, the facility staff failed to evidence written notification of a hospital transfer on 7/14/24 was provided to the resident representative. A review of the clinical record revealed a progress note dated 7/14/24 that documented, writer at bedside w/ (with)resident to give evening medication, resident unarousable to voice and touch, noted labored breathing which is a change of condition from baseline call placed to (name of physician) by (licensed practical nurse), recommendations from MD (medical doctor) to send resident to ED (emergency department) for evaluation, RP (responsible party) (name) notified of coc (change of condition) and transfer to hospital @ (at) 1650 (4:50 PM) , ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) (name) made aware via telephone. Further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement a resident's comprehensive care plan for one of 32 residents in the survey sample, Resident #72. The findings include: For Resident #72 (R72), the facility staff failed to implement the resident's comprehensive care plan for the resident's indwelling urinary catheter (1). R72's comprehensive care plan dated 8/16/24 documented, I have an indwelling urinary catheter r/t (related to) urinary retention .Maintain dignity bag/privacy cover over urinary collection bag when in social settings and when visible to others. On 9/9/24 at 7:17 p.m., R72 was observed lying in bed. The resident's indwelling urinary catheter bag was attached to the bed frame. There was no privacy cover on the bag, urine was observed in the bag, and the bag was visible from the hall. On 9/10/24 at 4:09 p.m., an interview was conducted with RN (registered nurse) #2. RN #2 stated the purpose of the care plan is to provide individualized care for each patient. RN #2 stated nurses have access to residents' care plans…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care to a dependent resident for one of 32 residents in the survey sample, Resident #2. The findings include: For Resident #2 (R2), the facility staff failed to maintain trimmed fingernails. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an annual assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/23/24, the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section GG documented R2 requiring substantial/maximal assistance for personal hygiene and having impairment on one side in the upper extremities. Section I documented R2 having diagnoses including but not limited to Diabetes Mellitus (1). On 9/9/24 at 7:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with R2 in their room. R2 was observed lying in bed with the left hand observed to be contracted with the fingers closed in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide care and services for an indwelling urinary catheter for one of 32 residents in the survey sample, Resident #72. The findings include: For Resident #72 (R72), the facility staff failed to maintain the resident's indwelling urinary Foley catheter bag (1) in a sanitary manner. A review of R72's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 8/26/24 for an indwelling Foley catheter for urinary retention. On 9/9/24 at 7:17 p.m., R72 was observed lying in a low bed. The resident's indwelling urinary Foley catheter bag was attached to the bed frame and was lying on the floor. On 9/10/24 at 4:09 p.m., an interview was conducted with RN (registered nurse) #2. RN #2 stated indwelling urinary Foley catheter bags should be kept off the floor for infection control. On 9/10/24 at 4:39 p.m., ASM (administrative staff member) #1 (the administrator) and ASM #2 (the director of nursing) were made aware of the above concern. The facility policy titled, Catheter Care,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,033 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,033 — penalty dated 2024-09-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA