Cambridge Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 314 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 142 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 201 beds and averages 157.3 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ165363, NJ165497, NJ168316 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 10/17/2023 and 10/19/2023, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe environment and supervision of a ambulatory cognitively impaired resident on a secured unit. The facility failed to identify that a staff member didn't follow the policy for storage of personal items. It was determined on 9/7/2023 that an Activity Assistant (AA) left her Cambridge fanny pack (a facility issued fanny pack with zipper provided to staff during orientation to carry around items securely.) unsupervised on the second shelve of a three-tier activity cart and the resident ( Resident #2) took it. Resident #2 was found by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) with an opened bottle of Hydroxyzine 50 miligram (mg) (a medication used to treat anxiety) that belonged to the AA. The AA and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) counted the pills in the bottle and confirmed there were three…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's plan of care was followed and communicated to all facility staff to prevent falls. Resident #2 fell and sustained head trauma with a laceration to the head with active bleeding which required transferring Resident #2 to the hospital. This deficient practice was identified for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for accidents and incidents. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 11/6/25 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #2's closed electronic Medical Record (EMR).A review of the Face Sheet (an admission summary) reflected that Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; Parkinson's disease, need for assistance with personal care, hemiplegia unspecified affect, muscle wasting and atrophy and unspecified dementia.A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 7/21/25, reflected that Resident #2 scored 7 out of 15 on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of pertinent documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted to identify the causal factor of a fall for a severely cognitively impaired resident who was found lying on the floor in a pool of blood, that resulted in a hematoma and laceration to the head, and required emergent transfer to the hospital on 9/5/25. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for accidents and incidents, and was evidenced by the following:On 11/6/25 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed the closed medical record (Electronic and Paper) for Resident #2.According to the admission Record, Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; Parkinson's disease, need for assistance with personal care, hemiplegia unspecified affect, muscle wasting and atrophy, unspecified dementia.A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review and review of other pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to treat and manage a resident's pain consistent with professional standards of practice. This was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pain and was evidenced by the following:A review of the resident admission Record (admission summary) indicated that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included but was not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a group of lung diseases that cause airflow obstruction and breathing difficulty) and osteoporosis (causes bones to become thinner, weaker and more likely to fracture). A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)-an assessment that facilitates a resident's care) dated 9/10/25, indicated that Resident #1 scored a 3 (three) out of 15 on the Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated that the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also reflected that Resident #1 required maximum assistance with all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 7/25/2025 from 09:49 AM to 10:14 AM the surveyor accompanied by the Food Service Director (FSD), observed the following in the kitchen:1. In the walk-in freezer a frozen lasagna was wrapped in plastic wrap with a use by date of 7/25/25. When asked if lasagna should be used, the FSD replied No, I'm going to take it out right now. The expired food was removed by FSD.2. In the walk-in refrigerator a container of chicken noodle soup wrapped in plastic wrap with a use by date of 7/28/25. The expired food was removed by FSD.On 7/30/2025 at 10:36 AM on the [NAME] unit in the pantry 11 plastic cups labeled for 7/30 7-3 were seen stacked facing up and exposed to the air. Licensed Practical Nurse, (LPN) #1 accompanied surveyor to the [NAME] unit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-05 · tag F0813 — pattern
  Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, the facility failed to ensure that food brought to residents by family and other visitors were stored, handled, and consumed in a safe and sanitary manner. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 6 residents (Resident # 9, Resident # 13, Resident # 26 and Resident # 51) who had personal refrigerators in their bedrooms.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 07/31/2025 at 10:23 AM, the surveyor observed that Resident # 26's personal refrigerator, located in room [ROOM NUMBER]-W temperature log had not been filled out since July 18th.On 07/31/2025 at 10:24AM, the surveyor observed that Resident # 9's personal refrigerator, located in room [ROOM NUMBER]-W, was missing temperature log entries for the whole month of July.On 07/31/2025 at 10:42 AM, the surveyor observed that Resident #51's personal refrigerator, located in room [ROOM NUMBER]-D had no temperature log was on the refrigerator for the month of July.On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled:Number of residents cited:This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:A review of Resident # 14's admissions record revealed that, Resident # 14 was admitted with but not limited to Heart Failure, and Peripheral Vascular Disease (a condition in which narrowed arteries reduce blood flow to the arms or legs).A review of Resident #14's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care dated 06/27/2025 revealed under section N that the resident was ordered an anticoagulant (a medication that helps thin the blood).A review of Resident #14's Electronical Medical Record revealed a physician's order with a state date of 05/26/2025 for apixaban (a medication that helps thin the blood) 5 milligrams to be given every twelve hours. A review of the current Care Plan (CP) for Resident #14 did not include documentation of a CP focus area or interventions for the use of an anticoagulant.During an interview on 08/01/2025 at 09:58 AM with the surveyor the Unit Manger Registered Nurse (UMRN)# 1 said that care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living specifically by not turning the resident in bed every two hours to prevent skin deterioration. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 5 residents (Resident # 179, 152) investigated for Activities of Daily Living. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of Resident # 179’s Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool) dated 9/15/2024 revealed under section “GG” that he/she has lower extremity impairment on both sides. Further, the MDS revealed under section, “M” that he/she is at risk of pressure ulcers/injury. A review of Resident # 179’s Care Plan revealed a focus of an Activity of Daily Living (ADL) Self Care Performance deficit related to deconditioned status post hospitalization, pain, and weakness. The Care Plan revealed an intervention for “Bed Mobility” that Resident # 179 requires the assistance of one staff member…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that facility to failed to ensure residents received the appropriate pain management by administering pain medications according to the physician's ordered pain level parameters. This deficient practice was identified in 2 of 4 residents reviewed for pain (Resident #7 and #49) and was evidenced by the following: 1.On 7/29/2025 at 10:47 AM, during the initial tour Resident #7 was in the room in bed. The resident's left leg was elevated on pillows and the resident appeared comfortable to the surveyor. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #7.A review of the Face Sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but not limited to; fracture of the lower extremity, diabetes (high blood sugar), and depressive disorder.A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care dated 7/11/25, section C for cognitive patterns revealed the resident had a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint # NJ00172812Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide access to the call system while a resident was in bed. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 8 residents investigated under the Environment Task. (Resident # 2 and Resident # 77)On 07/29/2025 at 10:29 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident # 2 asleep in bed. At that time, the surveyor observed the handheld call device on the floor adjacent to the bed.On the same date at 10:37 AM, the surveyor observed Resident # 77 awake in bed. At that time, the surveyor observed the handheld call device on the floor adjacent to the bed.On 07/30/2025 at 10:29 AM, the surveyor observed Resident # 77 wake in bed. At that time, the surveyor observed the handheld call device on the floor adjacent to the bed.On 07/31/2025 at 09:40 AM, the surveyor observed Resident # 2 asleep in bed. At that time, the surveyor observed the handheld call device on the floor adjacent to the bed.On the same date at 09:42…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-24 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — pattern
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed a.) conduct quarterly Interdisciplinary Care Plan (ICP) meetings and b.) to consistently maintain documentation showing that the resident's representative (RR) was invited or attended ICP meetings in accordance with the facility practice and policy. This deficient practice was identified for two (2) of 36 residents (Resident #67, #81) reviewed, and was evidenced by the following: On 01/22/23 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed the admission Record (AR) for Resident # 67 which reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but was not limited to dementia with mood disturbances, major depressive disorder, recurrent and cognitive communication deficit. It further reflected that resident had a Power of Attorney (POA) with contact information listed on the AR. The surveyor reviewed Resident #67's medical record which revealed the following information: A review of Resident #67's Care Plan Meeting Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the resident's environment, equipment and living areas in a safe, sanitary, and homelike manner. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of four (4) units ([NAME] Glen) was evidenced by the following: The surveyor conducted a tour of the [NAME] Glen Unit on 1/10/24 at 9:52 AM. The surveyor interviewed Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM #1) who explained that the [NAME] Glen Unit was comprised of dementia (cognitively impaired) residents and some residents that had behavioral disturbances related to dementia. RN/UM #1 informed the surveyor that Housekeeping was responsible for cleaning/maintaining the resident rooms and daily touch surfaces and the certified nursing assistants (CNAs) were responsible for making beds, changing bed linens, and general cleanliness of the rooms. During the tour the surveyor identified the following: 1.) In room [ROOM NUMBER], beneath the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$24,911 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $9,318 — penalty dated 2023-09-07
• $15,593 — penalty dated 2023-09-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ