Laurel Brook Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center
3718 Church Road, Mount Laurel, NJ 08054 · For profit - Corporation · 220 certified beds · (856) 235-7100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $51,495 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-16)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.9% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.3% | 4.6% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 24.9% | 12.1% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.4% | 2.3% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.4% | 8.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.7% | 18.8% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.1% | 97.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.3% | 5.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.0% | 15.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.2% | 12.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 69.3% | 80.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.8% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.4% | 8.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.18 | 2.07 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.05 | 1.11 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 498 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 74.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 123 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.5%CMS range 44.1–52.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.7%CMS range 9.7–14.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 74.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 66.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 64.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 5.3–9.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.07 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 220 beds and averages 201.0 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-10-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Part B. The facility further failed to: complete a safe smoking evaluation immediately upon the identification of a change in resident's smoking status. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #191) reviewed for smoking. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 2. ) On 10/9/24 at 1:44 PM, the surveyor attempted to meet with Resident #191 who was not in their room. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #10 was present outside of the resident's room and stated that the resident was outside smoking. The surveyor went to the courtyard and observed Resident #191 seated at a table with another resident in the designated smoking area. When interviewed, the resident stated that they only smoked now and then. Resident #191 stated that they had matches and a pack of cigarettes and proceeded to show the surveyor the matches that were stored in a pencil case and a pack of cigarettes that were on the table in front of the resident. The resident stated that there was no smoking allowed inside of the facility. The resident stated that he/she was allowed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was identified in the facility's kitchen and 2 of 4 nursing unit pantries designated for resident food, and was evidenced by the following:On 1/14/26 at 9:56 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Food Service Director (FSD) who explained the procedures for the dietary staff which included:-Staff must wash their hands at the designated handwashing sink.-Dented or compromised canned goods must be stored in a designated dented can area to be disposed of for credit.-Dishware, utensils, and equipment must be air dried and not wet nested.-Food kept in the nursing unit pantry refrigerators must be labeled, dated, and discarded after three days. On 1/14/26 at 10:23 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the FSD, observed the following in the kitchen: At the designated handwashing sink: 1.When the surveyor turned the hot water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist were acted upon in a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #17) reviewed for unnecessary medications and was evidenced by the following:On 1/15/26, the surveyor observed Resident #17 sitting in the dining room eating lunch. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #17. According to the admission Record, an admission summary, the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 10/10/25, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. A review of the individual comprehensive care plan (ICCP), dated 11/13/23, included the resident was at risk for adverse reaction related to polypharmacy. Interventions included: review Consultant Pharmacist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint # 2671178Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to follow the wound care consultant's treatment recommendations for a resident with pressure ulcers (skin damage caused by pressure). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident # 6) reviewed for pressure ulcers. On 1/14/26 at 10:40 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident #6 was observed in a reclining chair in the dayroom with eyes closed. On 1/15/26 at 11:15 AM, the surveyor entered Resident #6's room and noted a malodorous odor. The surveyor asked the nurse caring for the resident if the resident had any wounds. The nurse stated the resident had multiple wounds and that wound care was completed on the 3:00 PM-11:00 PM shift. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed Resident #6 had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, quadriplegia (cannot move arms or legs), kidney failure, depression, and schizophrenia (a condition that can make it hard to tell what is real). A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently follow medication hold parameters according to the physician's order and Consultant Pharmacist's recommendations. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #17) reviewed for unnecessary medications and was evidenced by the following:On 1/15/26, the surveyor observed Resident #17 sitting in the dining room eating lunch. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #17. According to the admission Record, an admission summary, the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia and hypertension (high blood pressure). A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 10/10/25, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. A review of the individual comprehensive care plan (ICCP), dated 11/1/24, included the resident had hypertension related to lifestyle.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #: 2614619 Based on interviews, record review and review of pertinent facility documents 09/18/2025 and 09/23/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was protected from verbal and physical abuse on 12/18/24 when a house keeping staff was observed yelling and kicking a resident (Resident #4). The facility also failed to follow its policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program Resident. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 9 residents and was evidenced as follows:According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that include but not limited to: Unspecified Dementia (loss of cognitive function, thinking), Depression (feeling of severe despondency and dejection), and History of Falling. According to the Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool that provides a comprehensive assessment of a resident's functional capabilities, dated 07/04/2025, under Section C-Cognitive Patterns showed that the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, medical record reviews, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for an allegation of verbal abuse. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #2), and was evidenced by the following:A review of the Facility Reportable Event (FRE) submitted to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) dated 8/01/24, included an allegation of rough handling of Resident #2.According to the admission Record (AR) face sheet, Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction (long-term, residual problems after a past stroke), acute embolism and thrombosis (occurs when a clot (or other foreign material) breaks free and travels through the bloodstream, blocking a vessel elsewhere), gangrene (the death of body tissue that occurs when blood supply is interrupted) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a condition involving constriction of the airways and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #: NJ179543 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents on 1/16/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate hand hygiene during an observation of a resident's wound treatment for 1 of 3 residents ( Resident #1). This deficient practice has the potential spread of infection in accordance wiht the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, standards of clinical practice and facility policy as evidenced by the following: According to the CDC Clinical Safety: Hand Hygiene for Healthcare Workers dated 02/27/24 revealed: Healthcare personnel should use an alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) or wash with soap and water for the following clinical indications: Immediately before touching a patient . Before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same patient . After touching a patient or the patient's immediate environment After contact with blood, body fluids, or contaminated surfaces Immediately after glove removal. On 1/16/2025 at 9:43 A.M., during a unit tour with the Unit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint#: NJ00176792 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 11/19/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to notify a resident's physician of unavailable medication, follow facility policies regarding unavailable medication, and charting and documentation. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 3) reviewed for physician notification. This deficient practice was evidence by the following: According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #3 was admitted to facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to aftercare following joint replacement, unspecified atrial fibrillation (an irregular, rapid heart rhythm that can lead to blood clots in the heart and increase the risk of stroke), and anxiety. A review of the Resident #3's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 05/15/2024, reflected the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4.) During the initial tour on 10/8/24 from 10:55 AM to 1:11 PM of Central Unit, the surveyor observed the following: -room [ROOM NUMBER]-A: There was a hole in the ceiling that was covered with clear plastic surrounded by black electrical tape. There was a dried substance noted in the center of the plastic that covered the hole in the ceiling. A PTAC (packaged terminal air conditioner unit) had a visibly dented and damaged front cover, and a portable air conditioner unit that was vented out of the resident's window were both in the room. Resident #81 and his/her spouse were present and stated, the ceiling should not be that way, and it has been that way since around Christmas. They put the plastic up in the early part of the year. I would think it would have been fixed by now. The resident's spouse stated that he/she mentioned it to maintenance previously, who stated that they would come back and fix it. -Room: 15-B: A wall unit air conditioner had a thick coating of dust on the outside of the vent cover.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was identified in the facility's kitchen and 5 of 5 refrigerators designated for resident food, and was evidenced by the following: On 10/08/24 from 9:30 AM to 10:45 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Food Service Director (FSD) toured the kitchen and observed the following: In the refrigerator identified as the Korean Refrigerator: 1. Two sealed bags of cooked rice with a use-by date of 10/02/24. The FSD removed the two bags from refrigerator and discarded them. On 10/15/24 at 10:36 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM) observed the following in the refrigerator designated for resident food in the East unit pantry: 1. Single-serving size containers of cranberry cocktail juice that had a use-by date of: -01/2024 (1 container) -03/2024 (1 container) -04/2024 (1 container)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-16 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility's Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) failed to ensure staff implemented facility policies and procedures to ensure a.) residents were provided with care and services to achieve their highest practical wellbeing, and b.) maintain the resident environment, equipment and living areas in a safe, sanitary, and homelike manner. This deficient practice was identified for and 5 out of 5 nursing units, and was evidenced by the following: Refer to F584, F645, F657, F689, F758, and F812 A review of the Administrator's job description provided by the facility revealed the following: The Administrator's primary purpose is to direct the day-to-day functions of the center in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guideline, and regulations that govern nursing centers to assure that the highest degree of quality care can be provided to the residents at all times. Duties and Responsibilities included but not limited to: plan, develop, organize, implement,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-16 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) to ensure the resident was referred to the appropriate state-designated authority for level II PASARR evaluation and determination. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of 1 resident (Resident #97) reviewed for level II PASARR and was evidenced by the following: On 10/15/24 at 10:08 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record for Resident #97. A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident had diagnosis that included, intellectual disability, schizophrenia and generalized anxiety. A review of the PASARR level I Screening Tool dated 2/7/24 and signed by the facility's social worker (SW), indicated the following: Section II - Mental Illness Screen showed the resident had diagnosis or evidence of a major mental illness and the screen was negative. Section II- Intellectual Disability/Developmental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to revise a resident's individualized comprehensive care plan (ICCP) related to smoking for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #73, #102 and #198) reviewed for accidents. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 10/9/24 at 1:52 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #102, awake and alert, sitting in a chair at a table in the outside smoking patio. The surveyor observed a red pack of cigarettes with a black lighter on top of the pack of cigarettes on the patio table. The resident confirmed the cigarettes and lighter were his/hers and that he/she did not use a smoking apron anymore. Resident #102 further stated that he/she can come out to smoke anytime between 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM, and there was no supervision by the staff. Resident #102 stated that they kept their cigarettes in the drawer in their room. A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that Resident #102 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2.) On 10/08/24 at 9:31 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #167 in his/her room. A review of the admission Record (admission summary) reflected the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, anxiety disorder, depression, and bipolar disorder (mental illness that causes unusual shifts in mood). A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 9/4/24, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 which indicated that the resident's cognition was intact. A review of Resident #167's Physician's orders located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed an order for Lorazepam (medication used for anxiety) 0.5 milligram tablet to by given by mouth every 6 hours as needed for anxiety disorder, with a start date of 08/29/24. The active order did not include a duration for use or stop date. A review of the Pharmacy Consultant Report, dated 8/30/24, revealed the following documentation: Resident has a PRN (as needed) order for Lorazepam as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-16 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — patternProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of other pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary dental care services in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #143) reviewed for dental care services. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 10/8/24 at 11:06 AM, during the initial tour of the facility the surveyor observed Resident #143 lying in bed awake with a visitor present at the bedside. The resident stated that he/she was ordered a mechanical soft diet (designed for people who have trouble chewing/swallowing). The resident further stated, I lost my bottom denture a year ago and thought that the facility was going to replace them, but it never happened. A review of Resident 143's admission Record (an admission summary) revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnosis which included but were not limited to: Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following cerebral infarction (stroke), muscle wasting and atrophy (waste away), and type 2 (two) diabetes (the body has trouble…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review and review of other pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to report timely an allegation of staff to resident abuse to the facility administrator and the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #173) reviewed for an allegation of abuse. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour of the facility on 10/08/24 at 1:36 PM, Resident #173 was observed seated on the side of their bed. When interviewed, the resident was tearful at times as they described how they were spoken to by the Nurse Practitioner (NP). The resident stated that the NP told them that they would die if they did not take their potassium. The resident stated that he/she did not want care forced upon them. The resident stated that they preferred to take a more natural approach like eating bananas instead of taking medication such as potassium. The resident stated that they had declined the medication and that was what the NP was mad about. The resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a Tracking Record (Discharge) Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care of all residents, for 2 of 38 residents (Resident #108 and Resident #406) reviewed for resident assessments. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 10/11/24 at 1:00 PM, the surveyor completed record review of Resident #108 specific to MDS assessment. Resident #108 was discharged to home on 9/10/24. The Discharge Return Not Anticipated/End of PPS Part A Stay MDS was completed on 10/11/24. The discharge MDS was 17 days overdue. 2. On 10/11/24 at 3:00 PM, the surveyor completed record review of Resident #406 specific to MDS assessment. Resident #406 was discharged to the hospital on 7/9/24. The Discharge Return Anticipated MDS was completed on 8/2/24. The discharge MDS was 10 days overdue. Resident #406 was discharged to the hospital on 7/15/24. The Discharge Return Anticipated MDS was completed on 8/2/24. The discharge MDS was four days overdue. Resident #406…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included measurable objectives, timelines, and interventions to meet resident's psychological needs specifically by failing to implement a care plan for a resident diagnosed with anxiety on admission. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #167) reviewed for unnecessary medication. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 10/8/2024 at 9:31 AM, during the initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #167 in their room. A review of Resident 167's admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) revealed that they had a diagnosis that included but not limited to; major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 9/5/2024, under Section I- revealed an active diagnosis of anxiety. A review of the physician orders (PO) revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #: NJ176224 Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a.) a resident was assessed by a Registered Nurse (RN) after sustaining a fall and b.) a resident was evaluated by a physical therapist as per a physician's order. This deficient practice was evidenced for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #305) reviewed for accidents and evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #: NJ177592 Based on interview, record review, and a review of other pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the appropriate care was provided with no delay in treatment for a.) a resident who had a change in condition, with left lower extremity swelling and bruising, suspected DeepVein Thrombosis (DVT, blood clot) received a STAT (immediate) venous doppler (diagnostic test to rule out DVT) in a timely manner before being transferred to the hospital with emergency services, and b.) a resident who had a change in condition and experienced nausea, weight loss, and indigestion was rescheduled for an outpatient CT scan (x-ray image) in a timely manner in accordance with professional standards of nursing practice. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #255) reviewed for a change in condition and 1 of 5 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for nutrition. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of other pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to perform and document a skin assessment, obtain a treatment order, and implement timely interventions to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer upon the identification of an alteration in skin integrity for a resident previously identified to be at risk for the development of pressure ulcers. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #101) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 10/8/24 at 10:18 AM, during the initial tour of the facility the surveyor observed Resident #101 lying awake in bed with an air mattress motor noted at the foot of the bed. The resident stated that they had a wound on their bottom and did not receive care or pain medicine for the wound in a timely manner when requested during the 11 PM to 7 AM shift. The resident stated that the last incidence occurred three (3) weeks ago when they waited 3 hours. A review of Resident #101's admission Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure an indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag and tubing did not touch the floor and b.) ensure the urinary catheter drainage bag was changed as ordered by the physician for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #174 and #188) reviewed for urinary catheter. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 10/8/24 at 11:27 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #188 sitting in a wheelchair with a urinary catheter drainage bag (a collection device attached to a tube placed in the body to empty urine) secured to the wheelchair. The drainage bag was touching the floor. On 10/9/24 at 09:03 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #188 sitting in a wheelchair with a urinary catheter drainage bag secured to the wheelchair. The tubing that connected the drainage bag to the catheter was touching the floor. On 10/10/24 at 10:24 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #188 sitting in a wheelchair with a urinary catheter drainage bag secured to the wheelchair.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) provide fortified foods as prescribed by the physician, b.) obtain weekly weights as recommended by the Registered Dietician, and c.) obtain re-weights according to the facility's policy for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #91 and #7) reviewed for nutrition. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 10/11/24 at 12:12 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #91 receive his/her lunch tray which included a sealed pudding pack without a label. According to the resident's meal ticket, the resident was supposed to receive fortified pudding (pudding that contains extra nutrients). The surveyor took a picture of the lunch tray. At 12:35 PM, the Korean Program Assistant Director translated for the resident who stated he/she would sometimes eat the pudding and did not have a preference for flavor. On 10/15/24 at 12:37 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #91's lunch tray which included a serving of pudding packaged by the facility. According…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of other pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to store respiratory equipment in a safe and sanitary manner when not in use to reduce the incidence of infection for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #123) reviewed for respiratory care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 10/8/24 at 1:11 PM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor entered Resident #123's room with permission and observed a nebulizer machine (an electrically powered machine that turns liquid medication into a mist so that it can be inhaled directly into the lungs through a mask or mouthpiece) that was stored on top of a crowded table with the resident's personal belongings. The mask was not stored in a bag and condensation (moisture) was noted in the clear, plastic chamber. A vast area of an unknown brown substance was noted on two of the four sides of the nebulizer machine. The nebulizer unit was stored directly above a wall unit air conditioning unit which had a thick coating of dust on the vent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a performance review of all Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) at least every twelve months and provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of employee job performance reviews. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 6 CNAs (CNA # 12 and #8) reviewed for the completion of annual performance evaluations and was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 10/11/24 at 11:09 AM, the surveyor reviewed the personnel files of five Certified Nursing Assistants and noted that the Annual Staff Performance Appraisal of CNA #12 dated 12/20/23, was not signed by the employee, Supervisor or Department Head in the spaced provided. The caption above the signature block indicated, This performance appraisal has been reviewed and acknowledged by the Employee, Supervisor and Department Head, and a copy shall be placed in the employee's Human Resource File. During an interview with the surveyor on 10/11/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review and review of other pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the current resident census was accurately reflected and recorded on the Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report prior to posting the notice in prominent areas for residents and the general public to view. This deficient practice was identified on three of six survey dates was evidenced by the following: On 10/8/24 at 9:11 AM, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) stated that the facility census was 207. A review of the facility daily staffing sheet indicated that the resident census was 208. A review of the Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report dated 10/8/24-Day Shift, reflected that the Current Resident Census was 203. On 10/09/24 at 10:57 AM, the surveyor reviewed the Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report dated 10/9/24 which reflected that the current census was 203. A review of the facility daily staffing sheet indicated that the resident census was 208. On 10/11/24 at 1:08 PM, the surveyor reviewed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #: NJ177069 Based on observation, interview, and pertinent record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure the accountability of the Narcotic Shift Count logs were completed in accordance with facility policy, b.) ensure that narcotics were properly secured under two secured locks per facility policy, and c.) obtain and administer a medication per physicians order. This deficient practice was observed in 1 of 5 medication carts reviewed for medication storage and 1 of 5 residents (Resident # 355) reviewed for medication adminsitration, and was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 10/10/24 10:45 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of Registered Nurse #1 (RN #1), reviewed the North 1 Unit's medication B Cart shift to shift narcotic count logs which indicated the following missing documentation: Nurse's signature going off duty for 9/26/24 7 AM - 3 PM shift Nurse's signature coming on duty 10/9/24 11 PM - 7 AM shift Nurse's signature coming on duty 10/10/24 7 AM - 3 PM shift The Is count correct: Yes / No column was blank for all shifts from 9/26/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all medications were administered without an error rate of 5% or less. During the medication pass observation on 10/9/24 at 8:21 AM, the surveyor observed four nurses administer medications to four residents. There were 32 opportunities and 2 errors which calculated to a medication administration error rate of 6.25%. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #92) and was evidenced by the following: On 10/9/24 at 8:21 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 obtain a bottle labeled probiotic from the supply of house stock medications (medication that can be obtained over the counter without a prescription). The LPN placed the probiotic capsule in a medication cup and immediately after, documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) that the medication was administered. The LPN gathered all the resident's medications, including the probiotic. The surveyor asked the LPN if she had all the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to properly dispose of expired medical equipment and maintain clean and sanitary medication storage areas. This deficient practice was observed in 2 of 3 medication storage rooms and 1 of 5 medication carts reviewed for medication storage and labeling and was evidenced by the following: On 10/10/24 at 9:31 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the Registered Nurse Unit Manager (RN/UM) observed the East Medication Storage Room, which contained one (1) box of Shiley inner cannulas (a plastic medical tube which is inserted into a resident's tracheostomy (an opening in the neck into the windpipe to help a person breathe) containing 10 expired cannulas with an expiration date of 3/25/24. On 10/10/24 at 10:07 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager #1 (LPN/UM #1) observed the North One nursing unit's medication storage room in which the following expired items were identified: One (1) tracheostomy care tray expired 9/10/23 Two (2)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to A.) perform hand hygiene before preparing and administering medications. B.) failed to maintain a non-touch technique when returning excess medication to the original bottle. and C. failed to disinfect the blood pressure equipment after each use. This breach in infection control practice occurred during 2 of 4 medication administration observation. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 10/09/2024 at 08:21 AM during the Medication Administration task, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 prepare and administer Resident #92's medication. He/She did not perform hand hygiene prior to preparing the resident's medication and after administration. 2.) During the same medication observation, Resident #92 had an order for Tylenol extra strength tablet, give two tablet by mouth every 12 hours. LPN #1 erroneously poured 3 tablets into the bottle cap instead of 2 tablets. As LPN #1 returned the excess tablet to the original…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #: NJ165714 Based on observations, interviews, a review of the medical record, and other pertinent facility documents on 10/3/23, it was determined that the facility failed to provide documented evidence of care provided to a resident (Resident #2). The facility also failed to follow the Certified Nursing Assistant's job description and its policies titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting for 1of 4 residents (Resident #2) reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) was as follows: According to the AR Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on 7/2//23 with diagnoses which included but were not limited to Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Difficulty Walking, Major Depressive Disorder, Hypertension, and Muscle Wasting. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 7/6/23, Resident # 2 had a BIMS score of 15/15, which indicated the Resident #2 was cognitively intact. The MDS also showed Resident #2 had unstageable sacral pressure ulcer, needed total assistance and two-person physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to report to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) an allegation of resident-to-resident verbal abuse between Resident #72 and #146 that occurred on 5/19/23. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 reportable investigations reviewed, and was evidenced by the following: On 5/22/23 at 12:28 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #72 sitting in their room. Resident #72 informed the surveyor that on Friday (5/19/23), he/she was involved in a verbal screaming match and cursing with their roommate (Resident #146). Resident #72 reported that Resident #146 was speaking with their Nurse Practitioner (NP), and the NP asked Resident #146 a question, which the resident did not respond so he/she (Resident #72) answered the NP's question. Resident #72 continued that Resident #146 became upset that he/she was speaking on their behalf to their NP, and a screaming match with the use of profanity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to investigate a.) an incident of resident-to-resident verbal abuse for Resident #72 and #146 on 5/19/23, and b.) an incident with a resident sent to the emergency department with a diagnosis of fecal impaction to rule out neglect on 3/3/23. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect (Resident #72 and #189), and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 5/22/23 at 12:28 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #72 sitting in their room. Resident #72 informed the surveyor that on Friday (5/19/23), he/she was involved in a verbal screaming match and cursing with their roommate (Resident #146). Resident #72 reported that Resident #146 was speaking with their Nurse Practitioner (NP), and the NP asked Resident #146 a question, which the resident did not respond so he/she (Resident #72) answered the NP's question. Resident #72 continued that Resident #146 became…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) administer medications according to physician's orders; b.) clarify a physician's order; and c.) contact the pharmacy and physician for a medication (vitamin E) that was unavailable in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents observed for medication administration (Resident #282), and was evidenced as follows: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and responsibilities within the framework of case finding; reinforcing the patient and family teaching program through health teaching, health counseling and provision of supportive and restorative care, under the direction of a registered nurse or licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. 1. On 5/18/23 at 8:10 AM, the surveyor observed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure all medications were administered without an error of 5% or more. During the medication observation on 5/18/23, the surveyor observed three (3) nurses administer medications to three (3) residents. There were 30 opportunities, and two (2) errors were observed which calculated a medication administration error rate of 6.6%. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #282) that were administered medications by one (1) of three (3) nurses. The deficient practice was evidenced as follows: On 5/18/23 at 8:10 AM, the surveyor observed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) preparing to administer twenty-two (22) oral medications to Resident #282 which included three (3) tablets of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) 1000 milligram (mg) tablets and one (1) tablet of multiple vitamins with iron. On 5/18/23 at that same time, the surveyor observed the LPN enter Resident #282's room to administer the medications. The surveyor asked the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined the facility failed to a.) maintain medication storage rooms free of expired nutritional formula (Jevity 1.5 calorie) for 1 of 3 medication storage rooms inspected (North 1), and b.) ensure the required Federal narcotic acquisition forms (DEA 222 form) were completed with sufficient detail to enable accurate reconciliation for 2 of 8 forms reviewed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On [DATE] at 12:13 PM, in the presence of the Unit Manager/Licensed Practical Nurse (UM/LPN), the surveyor inspected the inventory and medications in North 1 Medication Room. The surveyor observed twenty-three (23) eight-ounce (8 oz) cartons of Jevity 1.5 calorie with the expiration date of [DATE]. At this time, the UM/LPN confirmed that the formula was expired and should not be in active supply. The UM/LPN confirmed there were no residents who currently received Jevity 1.5 calorie formula. When asked who had the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$51,495 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $48,350 — penalty dated 2024-10-16
- $3,145 — penalty dated 2023-12-18
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 86 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 86; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YR 2013 INVESTMENT TR UA 03252013 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 23% | since 08/07/2017 |
| M&T BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | — | since 08/07/2017 |
| BAUER, GARY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/07/2017 |
| HARMAN, DINA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/07/2017 |
| POTE, LAUREN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/07/2017 |
| VIROJA, YOGESH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/07/2017 |
| POSEN, MINDEE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/07/2017 |
| MARQUIS LIMITED LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/07/2025 |
| NUTRACO LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/10/2025 |
| RELIANT PRO REHAB LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/07/2025 |
| BLANK, ANDREW | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/07/2017 |
| FLAGLER, OSHER | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2025 |
| KAHANOW, AVIVA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2025 |
| KOHN, SARA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2025 |
| KOHN, SEAN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2025 |
| ROKEACH, FRAIDE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/09/2025 |
| ROKOWSKY, YITZCHOK | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/09/2025 |
| LAUREL BROOK PROPERTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/07/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $4.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NJ
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315524. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.