Willow Brook Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center
90 West Street, Wilmington, MA 01887 · For profit - Corporation · 142 certified beds · (978) 909-4586 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $10,358 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-12)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 24% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.7% | 16.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.7% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.1% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 92.9% | 15.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.6% | 3.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.5% | 15.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 26.9% | 19.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.5% | 94.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.4% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.0% | 21.2% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 28.3% | 21.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 80.5% | 77.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.5% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.6% | 11.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.71 | 1.88 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.32 | 1.50 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 164 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 45.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 95 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.1%CMS range 41.5–55.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 7.2–12.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 45.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 37.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 44.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.4% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.2% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.5%CMS range 5.4–12.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.91 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 142 beds and averages 131.8 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.82 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
56 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-09-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to keep one Resident (#45) free from neglect out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide incontinence care to Resident #45 for a total of 10 hours and assisted him/her with a meal while lying in soiled incontinent briefs, resulting in a new skin impairment to the left buttock. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse and Neglect - Clinical Protocol, dated March 2018, indicated the following:-Neglect as defined at 483.5 means the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress.-Along with staff and management, the physician will help identify situations that might constitute or could be construed as neglect; for example, inadequate prevention or care of pressure ulcers, inattention to advanced directives and resident wishes, inappropriate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for 3 Residents (#45, #109, and #7) out of a total sample of 28. Specifically;1.) For Resident #45 the facility failed to provide incontinence care for the entirety of an over-night shift and the start of the morning shift, equaling a total of ten hours, resulting in skin breakdown;2.) For Resident #109 the facility failed to ensure cueing or assistance was provided for meals, resulting in Resident #109 eating 4 of 4 meals, that were not finger foods, with his/her hands; and 3.) For Resident #7, the facility failed to provide assistance with meals. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, dated as revised April 2025, indicated the following: -Residents are provided with care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living. Residents who are unable to carry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary treatment, services, and/or interventions to promote healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for four Residents (#45, #2, #17, and #23), who had pressure ulcers, out of 28 total sampled residents. Specifically,1a.) For Resident #45, the facility failed to implement a wound intervention resulting in deterioration of wound,1b.) For Resident #45, the facility failed to ensure staff provided prompt incontinence care to prevent new skin breakdown,2a.) For Resident #2, the facility failed to address and implement wound clinic recommendations for pressure ulcers to right and left buttocks, 2b.) For Resident #2, the facility failed to assess and document the measurements of the right and left buttock wounds weekly as ordered,3a.) For Resident #17, the facility failed to address and implement multiple wound care treatment recommendations for a left heel pressure related deep tissue injury (DTI) wound as recommended by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for three Residents (#2,#34 and #93) who required renal dialysis (a life sustaining treatment that helps the body remove extra fluids and waste products from the blood when the kidneys are not able to) out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the ordered fluid restriction amounts in milliliter were tallied and documented every shift. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Encouraging and Restricting Fluids', October 2010, indicated the following but not limited to:-Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure.-The following information should be documented in the resident's medical record; the amount in (ML) milliliter of fluids consumed by the resident during the shift.-If the resident refused the treatment, the reason (s) why and the intervention taken. 1.) Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in July 2025 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, test trays, and interviews, the facility failed to a.) provide the residents of the facility palatable food on 2 out of 3 units and b.) serve the residents in the facility that are on a pureed diet what was listed on the menu. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Food Temperature & Batch Cooking, undated, indicated the following:-Food should be served at proper temperature to ensure food safety and palatability. Batch cooking is encouraged to cook foods in smaller batches and serve immediately to maintain temperature, quality and safety.4. Acceptable serving temperatures are:Item: Minimum: Maximum: Potatoes, pasta, rice: >/=140 but preferably 160-175 degreesVegetables: >/=140 but preferably 160-175 degreesPureed foods, hot: >/=140 but preferably 160-175 degrees Pureed meals were observed on 9/9/25 and 9/10/25 on the Concord Unit. The meals consisted of 3 mounds of unrecognizable food, did not include gravy on the meat and looked unappetizing. Resident council meeting was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a dignified dining experience for three Residents (#109, #16 and #45) out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically,1. For Resident #109, the facility failed to provide assistance with eating, and the Resident resorted to eating non-fingerlike food with his/her hands for four entire meals. 2. For Resident #16, the facility failed to be seated at eye level while feeding the Resident. 3. For Resident #45, the facility failed to provide incontinence care prior to being served and was assisted with his/her meal while lying on top of soiled incontinence pads and with the odor of urine and feces present. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dignity, dated as revised February 2021, indicated: 1.) Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times. 5.) When assisting with care, residents are supported in exercising their rights. For example, residents are: e. provided with a dignified dining experience. 1.) Resident #109…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a significant change in the Resident's skin condition for two Residents (#45 and #17) out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically:1.) For Resident #45, the facility failed to notify the provider of a new skin breakdown on the buttocks. 2.) For Resident #17, the facility failed to notify the provider of a change in wound condition and obtain wound care orders when his/her left heel pressure related deep tissue injury (DTI) opened and had new drainage.Findings include: 1.) Resident #45 was admitted to the facility in August 2025 with diagnoses of sacrum pressure ulcer, congestive heart failure, stroke and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #45's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of a possible 15 which indicated the Resident has severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #45 is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure care was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#25) out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, for Resident #25 the facility failed to identify a skin area on weekly skin checks and failed to obtain a physician's treatment order for the area. Findings include:Resident #25 was admitted to the facility in November 2023 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/27/25, indicated that on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam Resident #25 scored a 5 out of a possible 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS failed to indicate any areas on his/her skin. Review of Resident #25's care plan indicates an Activity of Daily Living (ADL) care plan that indicates the following interventions:-Provide skin inspections daily during care. Observe for redness, open areas scratches, cuts, bruises etc. Report abnormal findings to Physician and document in Nurse's notes, start date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#109) out of a total sample of 28 residents maintained an acceptable parameter of nutritional status. Specifically, the facility failed to implement weekly weights as ordered by a physician for a Resident who was at risk for, and had experienced, clinically significant weight gain. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Weight Assessment and Intervention, revised March 2022, indicated, but was not limited to, the following:-Resident weights are monitored for undesirable or unintended weight loss or gain.-Residents are weighed upon admission and at intervals established by the interdisciplinary team.-Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment is retaken the next day for confirmation.-The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss will be based on the following criteria [where percentage of body weight loss = (usual weight - actual weight)/(usual weight) x 100]:-A. 1 month - 5%…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0729 — isolatedVerify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of staff employee files and interviews, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided to one Resident (#45) by licensed staff out of a total sample of 28 residents. Findings include: Resident #45 was admitted to the facility in [DATE] with diagnoses of sacrum pressure ulcer, congestive heart failure, stroke and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #45's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of a possible 15 which indicated the Resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #45 is incontinent of both bowel and bladder and is dependent on staff for incontinence care. On [DATE] at 9:36 A.M., the surveyor observed two staff providing incontinence care to Resident #45. One staff member was wearing scrubs while the other was dressed in business casual attire. The surveyor asked the staff member not wearing scrubs what her role was in the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete daily documentation for one Resident (#45) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Findings include: Resident #45 was admitted to the facility in August 2025 with diagnoses of sacrum pressure ulcer, congestive heart failure, stroke and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #45's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of a possible 15 which indicated the Resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #45 is incontinent of both bowel and bladder and is dependent on staff for incontinence care. Review of the (activity of daily living) ADL documentation for the month of September 2025 indicated the following missing documentation:-11 out of 31 eating opportunities for documentation were missing.-6 out of 31 bladder care opportunities for documentation were missing.-6 out of 31 bowel care opportunities for documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 45 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and policy review the facility failed to implement appropriate infection practices. Specifically, a staff did not wear gloves while handling dirty linen. Findings include:Review of facility policy titled 'Personal Protective Equipment-Gloves' dated July 2009, indicated the following but not limited to:-Gloves must be worn when handling blood, body fluids, secretions, excretions, mucous membranes and/or non intact skin.-All employees must wear gloves when touching blood, body fluids, secretions, excretions, mucous membranes, and/or non-intact skin.-Wash your hands after removing gloves. On 9/9/25 at 9:36 A.M., the surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 open soiled linen with bear hands, the soiled linen consisted of wet used towels, an adult brief with feces and a heavily soiled bed soaker. During an interview on 9/9/25 at 9:36 A.M., CNA #1 said she always wears gloves, and she was not sure why she touched the soiled linen without gloves. During an interview on 9/9/25 at 9:37 A.M., CNA #3 said all staff should wear gloves while…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) whose comprehensive care plan indicated he/she required assistance of two staff members for transfers, the Facility failed to ensure staff consistently implemented and followed interventions in his/her care plan, when on 11/17/25, during the evening shift, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA #1), transferred Resident #1 back to bed by physically lifting him/her from his/her wheelchair and putting him/her in bed, without another staff member present to assist with the transfer. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy, titled Care Plan, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated as revised in March 2022, indicated a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetable to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Each resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan will be consistent with the resident's rights to participate in the development and implementation of his or her plan of care,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain professional standards in the management and caring for urinary catheter devices for 4 Residents (#30, #103, #108 and #471). Specifically, 1. For Resident #30, the facility failed to empty urinary drainage bag as ordered. 2. For Resident #103, the facility failed to empty urinary drainage as ordered and maintain urinary drainage bag off the floor. 3. For Resident #108, the facility failed to empty urinary drainage bag as ordered. 4. For Resident #471, the facility failed ensure urinary catheter drainage bags and tubing were not stored directly touching the floor. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Catheter Drainage Bag', dated January 2023, indicated: -The purpose of this procedure are to prevent the drainage bag from becoming full and allowing urine to flow back into the bladder, to measure output, and to obtain sterile specimen. -Empty the urinary drainage bag at least every eight hours or more often if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff stored all drugs and biologicals in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice. Specifically, 1.) The facility failed to ensure medications were dated once opened and discarded as appropriate according to manufacturer's guidelines. 2.) The facility failed to ensure medications were not prepared in advance and stored in original, labeled containers in the medication cart. 3.) The facility failed to properly secure medication carts on one of three units 4.) The facility failed to ensure unauthorized nurses did not have access to medication cart. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Storage [sic], revised [DATE], indicated: - All medications will be stored in a locked cabinet, cart or medication room that is accessible only to authorized personnel, as defined by the facility policy. - Medications will be stored in the original, labeled containers received from the pharmacy. - Multi-dose vials…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure food was labeled in the unit kitchenette refrigerators, and that dented cans were not accepted into storage/circulation. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Food Storage (Dry, Refrigerated, and Frozen), indicated, but was not limited to, the following: Dented cans are set aside in a separate labeled area of the storeroom to avoid using them and discarded according to vendor procedure. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Food from Outside indicated, but was not limited to, the following: - Residents have the right to have foods brought in by family and friends. Due to the potential for foodborne illness or interfere with nutritional treatment, family members and/or visitors who bring food in from the outside will be educated on safe food handling practices and the importance of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a dignified existence was maintained for two Residents (#471 and #117) out of 27 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1.) For Resident #471, the facility failed to provide a privacy bag for a urinary catheter drainage bag. 2.) For Resident #117, the facility failed to provide a privacy bag for a urinary catheter drainage bag. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Rights, revised January 2022, indicated: - Federal and state law guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to privacy and confidentiality. 1.) Resident #471 was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with diagnoses including benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, brain cancer, and hemiplegia affecting the right dominant side. Review of Resident #471's medical record indicated there was no Minimum Data Set (MDS) data available. Review of Resident #471's assessment titled Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Evaluation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team was involved in determining whether the self-administration of medications was clinically appropriate for one Resident (#78), out of 27 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to assess if it was clinically appropriate for Resident #78 to self-administer an injection prior to the Resident self-administering the injection. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Self Administration of Medications, revised January 2023, indicated: - Criteria must be met to determine if a resident is both mentally and physically capable of self-administering medication. - The staff and practitioner will assess each resident's mental and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is clinically appropriate for the resident upon request. - In addition to general evaluation of decision-making capacity, the nurse will perform a more specific skill assessment, this can be accomplished on paper or through the EHR (electronic health record)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one Resident (#48) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to a.) implement weekly weights as care planned, and b.) develop a care plan for Resident #48's history of suicide attempts. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy, titled Care Plan - Comprehensive, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: - A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. - Facility utilizes and electronic health record for resident care plans (sic.). - The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will: o Describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. o Describe services that would otherwise be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards of quality to two Residents (#473 and #14) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, 1.) For Resident #473, the facility failed to implement a skin graft wound treatment as ordered by the physician. 2.) For Resident #14, the facility failed to arrange a follow up urology appointment. Findings include: Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated: - Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized prescriber's that are received by a variety of methods (i.e., written, verbal/telephone, standing orders/protocols, pre-printed order sets, electronic) in emergent and non-emergent situations. Licensed nurses in a management role must ensure an infrastructure is in place, consistent with current standards of care,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure quality of care was provided according to facility protocol and professional standards of practice for one Resident (#101), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were in place for a skin tear. Findings include: Resident #101 was admitted to the facility in August 2024 with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy, end stage renal disease. Review of Resident #101 Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the Resident scored a 10 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating he/she was moderately cognitively impaired. On 9/17/24 at 1:00 P.M., the surveyor observed Resident #101 sitting in his/her wheelchair. His/her left elbow had a dressing that was saturated with bloody drainage, and the dressing was undated. The Resident said he/she got the skin tear at an outside hospital during transportation. On 9/19/24 at 9:00 A.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review for one Resident (#39), out of 27 total sampled residents, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment to promote healing of a pressure ulcer. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for wound treatment of a pressure ulcer on Resident #39's left hip. Findings include: Resident #39 was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage (occurs when the brain's oxygen supply is completely cut off). Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/5/24, indicated the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) should not be conducted as Resident #39 is rarely/never understood. The MDS indicated Resident #39 was at risk of pressure ulcers, currently had unhealed pressure ulcers, and received pressure ulcer care. Review of the current physician's order did not include any treatments related to pressure ulcers for Resident #39. Review of Resident #39's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) dated 9/1/24 through 9/19/24, failed to include a treatment for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from accident hazards for one Resident (#93) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement an intervention intended to prevent further falls after Resident #93 had sustained multiple falls. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Fall Prevention and Management, revised January 2022, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: - The interdisciplinary team identifies and implements appropriate interventions to reduce the risk of falls or injuries while maximizing dignity and independence. Resident #93 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with diagnoses of cancer and malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #93 scored a 5 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating the Resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #93's fall incident reports indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutrition status for one Resident (#77) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement the Dietitian's recommendation for increasing the frequency of Resident #77's nutritional supplement. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Nourishments - Supplements, revised January 2023, indicated: - To prevent or respond to unplanned and unfavorable weight loss and malnutrition, the Dietitian will assess the nutritional status of all residents and recommends supplements as needed with the Physicians approval. - Refusal or poor intake acceptance should be reported to the Physician and Dietitian for further evaluation. Resident #77 was admitted to the facility in August 2024 with diagnoses including protein calorie malnutrition, diabetes, and dependent on dialysis chronic kidney disease. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/27/24, indicated Resident #77 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and maintenance of a peripherally inserted IV (intravenous) catheter (a thin flexible tube that is inserted into a vein for delivery of medication, blood or fluids directly into the bloodstream), consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#70), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, for Resident #70, the facility failed consistently flush the peripheral IV catheter and failed to monitor the peripheral IV site for complications. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Peripheral Catheter Flushing, revised January 2023, indicated: - Specific flush orders must be documented. - Flushing is performed to ensure and maintain catheter patency. - A physician's order is required to flush a peripheral catheter. The order must include the flushing agent, the amount, and the frequency. Resident #70 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with diagnoses including heart failure and hypertension. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#372) out of 27 total sampled residents. Specifically, for Resident #372, the facility failed to ensure the oxygen filter was cleaned as ordered. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Oxygen Administration' dated October 2022, indicated the following but not limited to: -Check the physician order. If it is unclear, clarification must be obtained. -Do not operate a concentrator without a filter or with a dirty filter. Resident #372 was admitted to the facility in August 2024 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with hypoxia and hypercapnia and was dependent on oxygen. Review of Resident #372 Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the Resident scored a 14 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating the Resident was cognitively intact. The MDS further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to: 1. ensure physicians orders for dialysis treatment and post dialysis weights were obtained for one Resident (#77) and 2. failed to ensure post dialysis weights were obtained after treatment for two 2 Residents (#117 and #372) out of a total of 27 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of facility's Dialysis Management policy, dated as revised October 2022, indicated the following but not limited to: -Facility will establish open communication with the Resident's Dialysis Center utilizing a dialysis communication book' completing the dialysis communication form. -Nutritional/fluid management including documentation of weights, resident compliance with food/fluid restrictions or the provisions of meals before, during and/or after dialysis and monitoring intake and output measurements as ordered. -On return from the dialysis center the nurse will review the communication returning from dialysis center. The nurse should review specifically, pre and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review for one Resident (#89) out of four residents observed, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5%. One out of four nurses observed made two errors out of 32 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 6.25%. Specifically, Nurse #1 administered the incorrect form of aspirin and administered the incorrect dose of calcium plus vitamin d3. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration, revised October 2022, indicated: - The medication nurse shall assure that the correct medication is administered by checking the physician's order and the medication label. Resident #89 was admitted to the facility in September 2022 with diagnoses including heart failure and hypertension. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/13/24, indicated Resident #89 had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15. During the medication pass observation on 9/18/24 at 7:58 A.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility failed to implement the infection prevention and control program. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff performed appropriate hand hygiene after removing gloves during wound care. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Hand Washing, revised December 2019, indicated: 6. Use an alcohol-based hand rub, or, alternatively, soap (antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial) and water for the following situations: after removing gloves. 9. The use of gloves does not replace hand washing/hand hygiene. Integration of glove use along with routine hand hygiene is recognized as the best practice for preventing healthcare-associated infections. a. Perform hand hygiene before and after glove use. On 9/17/24 at 10:20 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #2 perform wound care for a Resident with three left leg wounds in bed with a large amount of bloody drainage completely covering an area of approximately two feet by 1 foot of the bed sheets/bed sheet protector and the Resident's left leg. Certified Nurse Assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of four sampled residents (Resident #1), whose behavior included being resistive to care, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was free from the use of physical restraints, when on 02/29/24 during morning care, Certified Nurse Aide #1 held Resident #1's left wrist firmly to restrict his/her left arm movement, as he/she displayed combative behavior. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Restraint Use Policy, revised January 2023, indicates all residents have the right to be free from any form of physical restraint, imposed by staff as a means of coercion, discipline, convenience or retaliation and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. Review of Resident #1's medical record indicated his/her diagnoses include Morbid Obesity, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of body) )and hemiparesis (loss of strength) following cerebral infarction affecting his/her right dominant side. Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Assessment, dated 01/11/24, indicated he/she was dependent on others to roll left and right in bed. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-08 · tag F0943 — widespreadGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review and interview, for 9 out of 9 sampled employee personnel files the facility failed to provide annual abuse training for their staff, as required and per facility policy. Specifically, the facility failed to provide in-servicing that included resident abuse prohibition training. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse review date 10/23/22 included the following: Training: -Facility personnel will be trained on hire at orientation, bi-annually and as needed on an on going basis Prevention: -The facility will provide staff on orientation, annually and as determined, information on how and to whom they may report concerns, incidents, and grievances without fear of retribution. Identification: -Instruct all staff to report immediately, without fear of reprisal, any knowledge or suspicion of suspected abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and/or misappropriation of property. -Identify events, such as suspicious bruising of residents, occurrences, patterns, and trends, that may indicate abuse, neglect and/or mistreatment. During an interview on 9/8/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-08 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 5 of 5 staff reviewed received 12 hours of mandatory in-service training in a year. Findings include: Review of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) employee records indicated that 5 out of 5 employees did not complete the mandatory 12 hours of education required. During an interview on 9/8/23 at 12:30 P.M., The Director of Nursing and the Human Resources Representative said the facility attempted to locate staff training records and could not find any proof that the required in-service training had been done by staff. During interviews on 9/8/23 between 1:36 P.M., and 1:44 P.M., CNA #3, CNA #4, and CNA #6 said they have not received any in-service education in the past 2 years. During an interview on 9/8/23 at 2:00 P.M., The Director of Nursing (DON) said she was unsure what the yearly in-service requirements were for the CNA's, but said she would find out. During an interview on 9/8/23 at 2:04 P.M., The Director of Nursing said that each CNA is required to complete 12 hours of mandatory in-service training…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-08 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to obtain consent for the use of psychotropic medications for four Residents (#22, #31, #57, #43) out of a total sample of 43 Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Psychotropic Medication, dated [DATE], indicated Psychotropic drugs- any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. These drugs include but are not limited to drugs in the following categories: - Anti-psychotic - Anti-anxiety - Anti-depressant - Hypnotic 1. Resident #22 was admitted to the facility in [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, hypertension, end stage renal disease, and anemia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated he/she had severe cognitive impairments. Further review of the MDS indicated he/she required extensive assistance from a staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of Resident #22's physician orders, dated [DATE], indicated: Remeron Tablet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to implement the plan of care for six Residents (#161, #22, #74, #80, #43, #78) out of a total sample of 43 residents. Specifically: 1.) For Resident #161, the facility failed to implement a physician's order for a lymphedema pump (a medical device that helps reduce swelling and discomfort caused by lymphedema). 2.) For Resident #22, who is at high risk for skin breakdown, the facility failed to set his/her air mattress to the correct settings. 3.) For Resident #74, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for heels to be offloaded when in bed. 4.) For Resident #80, the facility failed to ensure he/she was wearing a wanderguard (a bracelet around the wrist or ankle that locks or alarms facility doors when resident is near them) as ordered. 5.) For Resident #43, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for floating heels while in bed using off-loading boots. 6.) For Resident #78, the facility failed to develop a plan of care for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure staff provided respiratory care consistent with professional standards for four Residents (#41, #91, #7 and #85) out of a total sample of 43 residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #41, the facility staff failed obtain a physician's order for the care of a tracheostomy (trach) (a surgically created artificial opening through the neck into the trachea, usually for the relief of difficulty in breathing) including the size and type of trach and failed to ensure that Nurse responsible for the care for 1 Resident (#41) out of 2 Resident's with a tracheostomy were trained, knowledgeable, and competent to provide safe care. 2. For Resident #91, the facility failed to obtain oxygen orders and date oxygen tubing. 3. For Residents #7, the facility failed to obtain oxygen orders, date oxygen tubing, fill humidification and clean oxygen filter. 4. For Resident #85, the facility failed to obtain oxygen orders. Findings include: Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the Facility Assessment, document review, in-servicing records, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff completed annual competencies for Intravenous (IV) Therapy. Specifically, the facility failed to train nursing staff on the care and treatment of a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC- intravenous catheter inserted into a vein in the upper arm and is advanced until the internal tip of the catheter is in the superior vena cava which is one of the central venous system veins that carries blood to the heart) and a peripheral IV (a thin flexible tube that is inserted into a vein for delivery of medication, blood or fluids directly into the bloodstream). Findings include: According to the Board of Registration in Nursing, 244 CMR 9.00: Standards of Conduct, a competency is defined as the application of knowledge and the use of affective, cognitive, and psychomotor skills required for the role of a nurse licensed by the Board and for the delivery of safe nursing care in accordance with accepted standards of practice. Competency is a measurable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5 percent. Three out of three nurses observed made seven errors in 34 opportunities on three of three units resulting in a medication error rate of 20.59%. These errors impacted three Residents (#1, #94 and #312), out of 4 residents observed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration, dated 10/2022 indicated the following but not limited to: *The medication nurse shall assure that the correct medication is administered by checking the physician's order and the medication label. *Medications ordered for a particular resident may not be administered to another resident. * Medication must be administered in accordance with orders, including any required time frame. 1. During a medication pass on 9/7/23 at 8:50 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #3 prepare and administer the following medications to Resident #1: *Sertraline 50 mg (milligram) one tablet by mouth, the name on the blister pack…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for two Residents (#78 and 310), out of a total sample of 43 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #78 , to ensure Clobazam and levetiracetam (medications used to treat seizure) were given timely per facility policy , resulting in a significant medication error. 2. For Resident #310, to ensure medication used for prophylaxis treatment for antiviral after a lung transplant was available for administration to the resident. Findings include: Standard of Practice for medication administration are as follow: -Nurses are responsible for administering medications within their scope of practice. -Nurses are knowledgeable about the effects, side effects, interaction of medications and take action as necessary. -Nurses adhere to Five Rights of medication administration: 1. Right patient 2. Right drug 3. Right time 4. Right dose 5. Right route Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure that 1. one of two medication carts was locked and secured on the [NAME] unit and 2. Medication carts were kept clean and opened medications dated/labeled per manufacturers guidelines on the Andover Unit Cart 2. and 3. Medications were stored in the original, labeled containers received from the pharmacy. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Medication Storage, revision date 10/2022 included the following: -All medications will be stored in a locked cabinet, cart of medication room that is accessible only to authorized personnel. -Medications will be stored in an orderly, organized manner in a clean area. -Medications will be stored in the original, labeled containers received from the pharmacy. -Expired, discontinued and/or contaminated medications will be removed from the medication storage areas and disposed of in accordance with facility policy. 1. On [DATE] at 8:49 A.M., the surveyor observed a medication cart on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review and interview the facility failed to 1) properly store food items to prevent the risk of foodborne illness and 2) follow proper food handling practices to prevent the risk of foodborne illness and contamination. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled General Food Preparation and Handling, undated, indicated the following: *Food Storage: Foods are received, checked and stored properly as soon as they are delivered. *Food will be prepared and served with clean tongs, scoops, forks, spoons, spatulas or other suitable implements to avoid manual contact of prepared foods. Any utensil or serving dish must be thoroughly cleaned and sanitized prior to use. *Use tongs or other serving utensils to serve breads or other items. Never touch food directly with bare hands. *Leftovers must be dated, labeled, covered and in a refrigerator. Use leftovers within 3 days or discard. 1) During the initial walkthrough of the kitchen on 9/6/23 at 7:15 A.M., the surveyor made the following observations: *A container of chicken salad with a preparation date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for Residents on one of three units, specifically, the Concord Unit. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dining dated and revised April 2023 indicated the following: *All residents at one table should receive their meal before moving to the next table. *Provide napkins and non-disposable cutlery and dishware (include cups and glasses) *Sit next to residents while assisting them to eat, rather than standing over them. The surveyor made the following observations: During the breakfast service on 9/6/23 at approximately 8:29 A.M., the following was observed in the dining room: *Residents were being served breakfast in Styrofoam take-out containers with plastic, disposable cutlery. *At a table, the first Resident was served breakfast at 8:30 A.M., the last Resident received his/her breakfast at 8:53 A.M., 23 minutes later. While waiting for his/her breakfast, the Resident was calling out loud I'm hungry, what about my breakfast. *Residents were observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for one Resident # 311 out of a total sample of 43 residents. Findings include: Resident #311 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses including depression. Review of Resident #311's Nursing Evaluation V 7 assessment dated [DATE], indicated the Resident was alert and oriented times four and had an intact memory. During environmental rounds on 9/6/23 at 8:37 A.M., Resident #311 reported to the surveyor that since his/her admission to the facility in August 2023 his/her privacy curtain had dark brown matter on it and he/she had told multiple staff and said no one had taken care of it. During an observation on 9/8/23 at 9:15 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #311 in his/her bed the privacy curtain still had dark brown matter on it. During an interview on 9/8/23 at 9:17 A.M., Nurse #1 inspected the privacy curtain and said that should not have been there and said rooms should be cleaned thoroughly before a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure three Residents (#77,#38, #51), out of a sample of 43 residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For resident #77, the facility failed to administer Quetiapine (a medication used to treat schizophrenia, bipolar disorder), Keppra (a medication used to treat seizures), and Vimpat (a medication used to treat seizures), timely. 2. For Resident #38 and #51, the facility failed to to implement a physician's order to obtain weekly weights. Findings include: Standard of Practice for medication administration are as follow: -Nurses are responsible for administering medications within their scope of practice. -Nurses are knowledgeable about the effects, side effects, interaction of medications and take action as necessary. -Nurses adhere to Five Rights of medication administration: 1. Right patient 2. Right drug 3. Right time 4. Right dose 5. Right route Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary activities of daily living for one Resident (#57) who is dependent on staff out of a total sample of 43 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to remove unwanted facial hair for Resident #57. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled ADL Support, dated and revised October 2022, indicated the following: *Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. *Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: Hygiene (grooming) Review of the facility policy titled ADL - Personal Hygiene, dated and revised October 2022, indicated the following: *Facial hair will be groomed as needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician or nurse practitioner (NP) of the recommendation made by a consultant, for one Resident (#64), out of a total sample of 43 residents. Specifically, the staff failed to notify the physician or NP that the prescription for diabetic shoes provided by the podiatrist surgeon was misplaced, thus delaying Resident #64 in receiving the diabetic shoes. Findings include: Resident # 64 was admitted to the facility in April 2022 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #64 scored a 12 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS), which indicates moderate cognitive impairment. During an interview on 9/6/23 at 12:24 P.M., Resident #64 said he/she was upset about a staff member not taking accountability. Resident #64 said that he/she is diabetic and has weakness on the left side of his/her body from a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview the facility failed to follow a physician's order for prevention of a pressure ulcer for one Resident (#43) out of a total sample of 43 residents. Findings include: Resident #43 was admitted to the facility in July 2022 with diagnoses including an unstageable pressure ulcer of right heel and left femur fracture. Review of Resident #43's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of a possible 15, which indicated he/she had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS further indicated that Resident #43 requires extensive assistance with all activities of daily living and has pressure ulcers to bilateral heels. On 9/6/23 at 8:18 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #43 lying in his/her bed on a regular mattress. On 9/7/23 at 6:56 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #43 lying in his/her bed on a regular mattress. On 9/7/23 at 9:47 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #43 lying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, policy review and record review, the facility failed to identify and address a significant weight gain for 1 Resident (#6) out of a total sample of 43 Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Weight Assessment and Interventions, dated and revised May 2019, indicated the following: *Weights will be recorded in the medical record (electronic health record where available) for each resident. *Any weight change of 5 lbs. (pounds) in a month and 3 lbs. in a week since their last assessment should be retaken within 72 hours for confirmation and verified by Nursing. *Re weight should be reviewed by the Licensed Nursing *Licensed Nurse should notify Dietitian of identified weight change once reviewed *Dietitian notification should be documented within Resident's medical record *The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight change will be based on the following criteria: 1 month - 5% weight change is significant, greater than 5% is severe. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide care according to professional standards of practice for one Resident (#310) with a Jejunostomy tube (a feeding tube: medical device used to provide liquid nourishment, fluids and medications by bypassing oral intake) out of a total sample of 43 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled 'enteral feeding' last revised 10/22 indicated the following but not limited to: *It is the policy of this center to provide enteral nutrition therapy to residents unable to obtain nutrition orally when such therapy is ordered by the physician and not clinical contraindicated. * Jejunostomy tube a feeding tube placed directly into the small intestine. *Continuous feeding: Enteral feeding delivered around the clock. Feedings are only stopped for medication administration and routine tube flushes. This type of feeding may or may not use and electronic pump but typically a pump is used. *Administration and feeding sets: -Feeding may be re-used for next scheduled feed as long as it is free from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and maintenance of a peripherally inserted IV (a thin flexible tube that is inserted into a vein for delivery of medication, blood or fluids directly into the bloodstream), consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#51), out of a total sample of 43 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to date Resident #51's IV line on the day of insertion. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Peripheral Catheter Removal, dated 1/23, indicated Peripheral catheters are routinely discontinued every 72 hours and rotated to another site if therapy continues. If the resident has very poor venous access, the site is without problem, and a physician's order has been secured, the catheter may be left in greater than 72 hours. Peripheral catheter/needles are removed at the completion of therapy, and if the site is reddened, swollen, painful, or leaking/draining. Resident #51 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards for one Resident (#22) who required renal dialysis (a life sustaining treatment that helps your body remove extra fluid and waste products from your blood when the kidneys are not able to) out of a total sample of 43 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that clamps and pressure dressings were kept in Resident #22's room for an emergency related to a tunneled hemodialysis catheter (a plastic tube used for exchanging blood between a patient and a hemodialysis machine). Findings include: Resident #22 was admitted to the facility in September 2020 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, hypertension, end stage renal disease, and anemia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated he/she had severe cognitive impairments. Further review of the MDS indicated he/she required extensive assistance from a staff for activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide behavioral health services as recommended by the behavioral health service therapist for one Resident (#78) out of a total sample of 43 residents. Findings include: Resident #78 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses including mood disorder and attention deficit hyperactive disorder. Review of Resident #78's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of a possible 15 indicating he/she has moderate cognitive impairment. On 9/6/23 at 9:04 A.M., Resident #78 was observed in his/her room, Resident #78 said that he/she has not been receiving mental health therapy and really needs it. The Resident further said that he/she sees a therapist weekly in the community and said he/she is concerned of not receiving the services while at the rehab facility. Review of the psychiatric evaluation and consultation report dated 8/2/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that the pharmacy recommendations were addressed by the attending physician for 1 Resident (#64), out of a total of 43 sampled residents. Findings include: Resident # 64 was admitted to the facility in April 2022 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the monthly pharmacist recommendations for Resident #64 indicated the following: - January 10, 2023, licensed pharmacist recommends to the physician checking for vitamin D level. - February 14,2023, licensed pharmacist recommends to the physician checking for vitamin D level. - March 14, 2023, licensed pharmacist recommends to the physician checking for vitamin D level. - April 11, 2023, licensed pharmacist recommends to the physician checking for vitamin D level. - May 9, 2023, licensed pharmacist recommends to the physician checking for vitamin D level. - June 13, 2023, licensed pharmacist recommends to the physician checking for vitamin D level and strength of vitamin D tablet. - July 11, 2023, licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for two Residents (#80 and #43) out of a total sample of 43 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #80 staff signed off on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) that a Resident was wearing a wander guard (a bracelet around the wrist or ankle that locks or alarms facility doors when resident is near them) when the Resident was not. 2. For Resident #43 staff signed off on Medication Administration Record (MAR) that the Resident had an air mattress when the Resident did not have one in his/her bed. Findings include: 1. For Resident #80 staff signed off on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) that a Resident was wearing a wander guard (a bracelet around the wrist or ankle that locks or alarms facility doors when resident is near them) when the Resident was not. Resident #80 was admitted to the facility in May 2021 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction and dementia. Review of Resident #80's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained to prevent the spread of infection during medication pass. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled 'Medication Administration' revised October 2022 indicated the following: *Staff shall follow established facility infection control procedures (e.g. handwashing, antiseptic technique, gloves, isolation precautions) when these apply to the administration of medications. During medication pass observation on 9/7/23 at 9:07 A.M., on the Andover resident care unit, Nurse #5 was observed placing two syringes directly on top of the medication cart then use them to withdraw medication from the bottles and administer medication into a resident's mouth. The syringes were placed inside the resident's mouth. During medication pass observation on 9/7/23 at 9:42 A.M., on the Andover resident care unit. Nurse #5 was observed preparing to administer subcutaneous injection to a resident's abdomen. Nurse #5 was observed palpating the resident's abdomen without gloves on, then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-09-19 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS) data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) System timely for two Resident (#18 and #99), out of 27 total sampled residents. Specifically: 1.) For Resident #18, the facility failed to transmit an MDS discharge assessment within 14 days after completion. 2.) For Resident #99, the facility failed to transmit an MDS discharge assessment within 14 days after completion. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual indicated an MDS discharge assessment must be transmitted within 14 days after the MDS completion date. 1.) Resident #18 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with diagnoses including low back pain and repeated falls. Review of facility census indicated Resident #18 was discharged from the facility on 5/10/24. Review of medical record indicated the MDS discharge assessment, dated 5/10/24, was completed 5/14/24, but was never transmitted. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-09-19 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one Resident (#92) out of 27 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility inaccurately coded the MDS to indicate the Resident was comatose or in a persistent vegetative state. Findings include: Resident #92 was admitted to the facility in April 2023 with diagnosis including traumatic subdural hemorrhage. Review of the most recent MDS assessment, dated 9/6/24, indicated Resident #92's hearing, speech, vision, cognitive patterns, mood, activity preferences and pain had not been assessed. On 9/17/24 7:49 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #92 in bed. Resident #92 was able to answer questions appropriately, follow commands and was watching a show on his/her electronic device. Review of nurse practitioner #1's progress note, dated 8/12/24, indicated Resident #92 had started to be more interactive with more speaking. Further review of the nursing clinical assessment, dated 9/4/24, indicated Resident #92 had short term memory loss, was oriented to person and place, coherent,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$10,358 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-09-12
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
The other 86 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 86; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| QUINTO NEXGEN LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/31/2024 |
| UKR NEXGEN LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/31/2024 |
| NFR 2020 IRRV TR | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/31/2024 |
| RSBRMK HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/31/2024 |
| SK NEXGEN TR | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/31/2024 |
| TRYKO NEXGEN HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/31/2024 |
| UAK 2020 IRRV TR | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/31/2024 |
| YK NEXGEN TR | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/31/2024 |
| YR NEXGEN TR | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/31/2024 |
| FORBRIGHT BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | since 10/31/2024 |
| BARRY, RYAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/03/2025 |
| CROWLEY, JEFFREY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/23/2025 |
| RELIANT PRO REHAB LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/23/2025 |
| POSEN, MINDEE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/31/2024 |
| SOMESWARANANTHAN, JANARTHANAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/31/2024 |
| KAHANOW, AVIVA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/02/2025 |
| ROKEACH, FRAIDE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/03/2025 |
| ROKOWSKY, YITZCHOK | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/03/2025 |
| WILLOW BROOK PROPERTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/31/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225568. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.