Arbor Ridge Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 124 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 73 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 111.8 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.86 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.93 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint Intake ID #408686Based on interviews, record reviews and reviews of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and treatment were provided timely to Resident #121, to prevent further change in condition. This failure delayed care for Resident #121 who was admitted to the intensive care unit at an acute care hospital with a diagnosis of septic shock (the most severe, life-threatening stage of sepsis [body's extreme response to an infection], which is a critical medical emergency requiring immediate hospitalization.) This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #121) reviewed for hospitalization.On 12/28/24 at 8:00 PM, Resident #121 had a change in condition with rapid, shallow breathing and difficulty breathing at rest, noisy breathing, restlessness, and cold lower extremities. The physician was notified and ordered to send the resident to the hospital. The nurse called a transport company instead of 911 to transport Resident #121. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one resident, Resident (R) 121, when he/she was readmitted to the facility. This failure had the potential to cause R121 to receive a less effective plan of care which could affect the quality of care and services provided.Findings include: Review of R121's record revealed R121 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by chemical imbalances, systemic illness or organ failure other than direct physical injury), pneumonitis (inflammation of the lungs), chronic kidney disease stage three, catatonia (a complex neuropsychiatric syndrome characterized by profound abnormalities in movement, speech, and responsiveness), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen levels) and a history of traumatic brain injury. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], under the MDS tab in the Electronic Medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide the SNF ABN (skilled nursing facility advance beneficiary notice) for two (Residents (R) 91 and R109) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. This failure placed the residents at risk of not knowing the costs or appeals process when they remained at the facility. Findings included. Review of the facility policy titled, Medicare Advanced Beneficiary and Medicare Non-Coverage Notices, dated September 2022 revealed, .The requirement to notify and explain via the SNFABN that the individual is no longer receiving Medicare Part A services based on the SNF's belief that Medicare Part A will not pay for the resident's stay separate and unrelated to the admission and discharge requirement under 42 CFR 483.15, which outlines the notification and requirements under which an individual may be discharged from the facility or when the transfer or discharge is not initiated by the resident .Termination-In the situation in which the facility proposes to stop furnishing all extended care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by a resident for one of four residents (Resident(R) 39) reviewed for abuse out of 27 sample residents when R32, who had no cognitive impairment, kissed R39's hand, who lacked any capacity to give consent. This had the potential to affect all the residents on the 2nd floor of the facility who were at risk of abuse. Findings include: 1.Review of R39's ''admission Record,'' located in the ''Profile'' tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R39 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, schizophrenia, obsessive compulsive disorder, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder and mood disorder. Review of R39's quarterly ''Minimum Data Set (MDS)'' with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/09/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero out of 15 which indicated R39 was severely cognitively impaired. 2. Review of R32's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to an report an allegation of sexual abuse by a resident for one of four residents (Resident (R) 39) reviewed for abuse out of 27 sample residents when R32 kissed R39 hands who lacked the ability to give consent, this had the potential to affect all the residents on the 2nd floor of the facility who were at risk of abuse. Findings include: 1.Review of R39's ''admission Record,'' located in the ''Profile'' tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R39 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, schizophrenia, obsessive compulsive disorder, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder and mood disorder. Review of R39's quarterly ''Minimum Data Set (MDS)'' with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/09/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero out of 15 which indicated R39 was severely cognitively impaired. 2. Review of R32's ''admission Record'' located in the ''Profile'' tab…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that MDS assessment was completed timely for one residents R32. This had to affect all the residents with MDS assessments. Findings include: Review of R32's ''admission Record'' located in the ''Profile'' tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R32 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder and anxiety. Review on 10/14/24 of R32's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) under the MDS tab of the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/20/24 was listed as Pending. Further review revealed the ARD date for completion was 10/15/24. During an interview on 10/17/24 at 10:00 AM with the MDS Coordinator (MDSC) who stated she has asked for additional help to assist with completing the assessments timely. She knew the 09/20/24 assessment was not completed within the times frames, and it should have been within 14 days. During an interview on 10/17/24 at 1:36 PM the Director of Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual, the facility failed to ensure that a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed timely for one residents R27 out of 27 residents reviewed in the sample. This had the potential to affect all residents with a significant change. Findings Include: Review of R27's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed readmission to the facility on [DATE]. Review on 10/14/24 of R27's Significant change MDS under the MDS tab of the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/30/24. Further review revealed the ARD date for completion was 08/04/24. Review of Physician Orders under the Orders tab of the EMR, dated 07/17/24, revealed an order for hospice. During an interview on 10/17/24 at 10:09 AM with the MDS Coordinator (MDSC) and Regional MDS coordinator (RMDS) the MDSC stated she was on vacation at the time the significant change assessment should have been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to ensure a quarterly assessment was coded accurately for one (Resident (R)83) in a total sample of 30. The facility failed to accurately code hospice for R83. This failure placed the residents at risk of unmet care needs. Findings included. Review of the October 2024 RAI, manual, page 1-5 revealed, .An accurate assessment requires collecting information from multiple sources, some of which are mandated by regulations .It is important to note here that information obtained should cover the same observation period as specified by the MDS [minimum data set] items on the assessment, and should be validated for accuracy (what the resident's actual status was during the observation period) by the IDT (interdisciplinary team) completing the assessment . Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a psychotropic medication contained a 14-day stop date, as required for one (Resident (R)106) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the residents at risk of being administered a medication unnecessarily. Findings included. Review of the facility policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, dated July 2022 revealed, .A psychotropic medication is any medication that affects brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior .Psychotropic medications are not prescribed or given on a PRN (as needed) basis unless that medication is necessary to treat a diagnoses specific condition that is documented in the clinical record .PRN orders for psychotropic medications are limited to 14 days . Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R106 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of cancer and pneumonia.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a valid physician order for a narcotic was obtained for one (Resident (R)25) of six sampled residents reviewed during medication pass. The facility failed to obtain a documented physician order for narcotic medication and failed to ensure there was documentation of symptoms for the use of narcotics. This failure placed the resident at risk of receiving medication Findings included. Review of an undated facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revealed, .Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed .Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frames . Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Review of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the MDS tab of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the label on an insulin pen matched the physician order for one (Resident (R) 87) of six residents reviewed during medication pass observation. This failure placed the resident at risk of receiving the wrong dose of medication. Findings included. Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage, dated 2001 revealed, Labeling of medications and biologicals dispensed by the pharmacy is consistent with applicable federal and state requirements and currently accepted pharmaceutical practices .If medication containers have missing, incomplete, improper or incorrect labels, contact the dispensing pharmacy for instructions regarding returning or destroying these items .Only the dispensing pharmacy may label or alter the label on a medication container or package . During a medication storage observation on 10/16/24 at 7:35 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 5 obtained an insulin pen from the top drawer of the medication cart. He stated that he would be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$27,378 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $27,378 — penalty dated 2026-06-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ