Nashua Post Acute Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 362 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 180 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 290 beds and averages 228.2 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 62 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.02 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.54 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.18 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe and clean environment for 3 of 5 units observed and 1 of 5 kitchenettes observed.Findings include:Unit #6 Observation on 11/18/25 at approximately 9:11 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed there was black tape adhered to floor threshold over uneven surface where the floor was lifting. Observation on 11/18/25 at approximately 9:18 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the oxygen concentrator had a layer of dust on the concentrator near the controls. Observation on 11/18/25 at approximately 9:23 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the wall between the bathroom and the resident's bed had a two by four foot area with exposed drywall. Further observation revealed a brown substance on the bed rail. The side table surface top was peeling along 25 percent of the table. Observation on 11/18/25 at approximately 9:50 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the privacy curtain had a brown substance in the midsection of the curtain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for main kitchen and 3 of 5 kitchenettes observed. Findings Include:Review of the facilities Food Receiving and Storage Policy , undated, on 11/18/25 revealed . Refrigerated/Frozen Storage 1. All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer are covered, labeled and dated ( use by date).7. Refrigerated foods are labeled, dated and monitored so they are used by their use-by date, frozen, or discarded.Foods and Snacks Kept on Nursing Units.2. All foods belonging to residents are labeled with the resident's name, the item and the use by date. 3. Refrigerators must have a working thermometers and are monitored for temperature according to specific guidelines.Main KitchenObservation on 11/18/25 at approximately 8:25 a.m. with Staff R (Food Services Director), of the Deli 2 refrigerator revealed the following items without and open…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper processing of resident's clothing and failed to implement policies and procedures for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for EBP.Findings include:Observation on 11/20/25 between at approximately 11:00 a.m. in the laundry room with Staff P (Infection Preventionist) and Staff O (Director of Housekeeping) revealed two residential washing machines were running on the normal mode and the warm water setting. Interview on 11/20/25 at approximately 11:00 a.m. with Staff O revealed the residential washing machines had been used for over a year for cleaning the resident's personal clothes. They use a household detergent on all personal clothes. Interview on 11/20/25 at approximately 2:30 pm with Staff V (laundry aide) revealed that the residential washers were used on the Normal Mode using the warm water setting and that the only detergent that was used was a household detergent. Staff V did not know the water temperature used when the warm water…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents who chose and were scheduled to have a weekly showers received showers for 3 of 8 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) in a final sample of 35 residents (Resident Identifiers are #36, #107 and #176).Findings include:Resident #176Interview on 11/18/25 at 11:55 a.m. with Resident #176 revealed that he/she gets a shower once a month and they would like one weekly. Review on 11/21/25 of Resident #176's Care Plan, dated 8/6/25, revealed that the he/she required one staff assistance with bathing. Review on 11/21/25 of the Unit 1 Licensed Nursing Assistants (LNA) Assignment Sheet revealed that Resident #176 was scheduled for showers weekly on the 3-11 p.m. shift every Thursday.Review on 11/21/25 of LNA Task Documentation for Resident #176's during the past 30 days revealed that under Shower Thursday 3-11 there was no documentation that a shower had been completed. Interview on 11/21/25 at 10:35 a.m. with Staff K (LNA) revealed that he/she had worked 11/20/25 (Thursday) on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
  Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to keep a resident free from involuntary seclusion for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for restraints in a final sample of 35 residents (Resident identifier is #131).Findings include:Observation on 11/18/25 at 8:30 a.m. through approximately 9:30 a.m., 12:00 p.m. through approximately 2:00 p.m. revealed Resident #131 sitting in his/her room at the bedside table coloring. Staff G (Activity Aide) was sitting in a chair with a bedside table outside of Resident #131's room blocking Resident #131's exit. Interview on 11/18/25 at approximately 9:00 a.m. with Staff G revealed that he/she was sitting outside of Resident #131's door for the day because Resident #131 required 1:1 (constant) supervision. Further interview revealed that Resident #131 Had been on 1:1's for about a week due to wandering. Interview on 11/18/25 at approximately 9:10 a.m. with Resident #131 revealed that he/she was unable to answer simple questions requiring a yes and no response. Observation on 11/19/25 at approximately 8:30…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents receive care in accordance with plan of care for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for choices in a final sample of 35 residents. (Resident identifier is #185.)Findings include:Interview on 11/18/25 at approximately 9:30 a.m. with Resident #185 revealed that he/she has been waiting to go to a follow up visit with the ENT (Ear, Nose, and Throat Specialist) for months. Further interview revealed that Resident #185 had been having an ongoing sore throat since September and had been asking nursing to make an appointment.Review on 11/21/25 of Resident #185's ENT office visit note, dated 7/1/25 revealed: . the following physician's order: nystatin (Mycostatin) 100,000 unit/ml suspension, Swish and swallow 5 ml (500,000 Units) four times daily for 10 days, Start Date 7/1/25, End Date 7/11/25, Indications: Chronic sore throat. Further review of the office visit note revealed, Follow up in about 8 weeks (around approximately 8/26/25).Review on 11/19/25 of Resident #185's medical record revealed that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to label medications with open expiration dates, monitor proper temperature controls, and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 2 of 6 medication carts observed and 2 of 3 medication room refrigerators observed. Findings Include:Observation on 11/18/25 at approximately 10:45 a.m. on Unit #6 revealed Staff E (Regional Registered Nurse) going through medications inside medication cart #5302 with no other facility staff present. Staff E appeared to be removing medications. Interview on 11/18/25 at approximately 10:45 a.m. with Staff E revealed that he/she was not assigned to the cart. Further interview revealed that Staff E works at another facility and was in the facility assisting during the survey. Interview on 11/18/25 at approximately 11:40 a.m. with Staff H (Administrator) confirmed that Staff E was not an employee of the facility. Staff E was employed by the corporation. Review on 11/18/25 of the facility policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage, Dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a nourishing snacks was provided to residents consistent with the resident's plan of care for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for food and 1 of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition in a final sample of 35 residents. (Resident identifiers are #53 and #181).Findings include:Resident #53Interview on 11/18/25 at 11:23 a.m. with Resident #53 revealed that he/she was not offered snacks and the only snacks available when Resident #53 requests snacks were crackers and cookies.Review on 11/20/25 of Resident #53's care plan revealed that Resident #53 had potential for nutritional problems due to diabetes. Further review revealed an intervention initiated on 7/1/25 to offer a nourishing HS (Hour of Sleep) snack daily. Resident #181Interview on 11/18/25 at 9:54 a.m. with Resident #181 revealed that snacks offered in the evening were saltines or graham crackers and juice. He/she stated that he/she was a diabetic and he/she was not offered a snack with protein. Interview further revealed that staff had told…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Unit 5 Kitchenette: Review on 10/8/2024 of September 2024 refrigerator temperature logs for Unit 5 Kitchenette revealed the following missing September temperatures: 9/18, 9/19, 9/21, 9/25, 9/26, 9/27, 9/28, 9/29.Based on observation, interview, and review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff used facial hair restraints when cooking and serving food from the steam table for 1 of 1 kitchens observed for meal service, and failed to label and store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety to prevent foodborne illness for 1 of 1 kitchens and 5 of 7 kitchenettes observed. Findings include: Review on 10/10/24 of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Food Code, dated 2017, retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/food/FDA-food-code/food-code-2017 revealed the following: .Annex 3, Public Health Reasons/Administrative Guidelines .Chapter 2 Management and Personnel .2-402 Hair Restraints 2-402.11 Effectiveness. (A) Except as provided in (B) of this section, Food employees shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, beard…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow established infection control guidelines for facility water management that had the potential to effect the facility census of 220 residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: Observation on 10/8/24 at approximately 8:30 a.m. of Unit 4 revealed the unit was not in use. Review on 10/9/24 of the facility's Legionella Surveillance with a revised date of 6/2023, revealed .5. Primary prevention strategies: .d. Temperature controls: . ii. Hot water shall be stored above 140 degrees Fahrenheit . Review on 10/9/24 of the facility's undated Water Management Plan Overview for: Premier Rehab and Healthcare revealed on page 12 .Control Measures: Hot Water Systems .Water Heater Control Measure: Check flow and return temperatures at hot water heater .Frequency: Monthly .Monitoring: Supply Temperature should be checked at the outlet of the Hot Water Heater and should not be lower than 140 degrees [Fahrenheit] . Further review revealed on page 21 .Risk factors: Little used Outlets…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 46 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

16 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NH