No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Springfield Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

463 West Sproul Road, Springfield, PA 19064 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 100 certified beds · (610) 544-2200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Apr 20261 immediate-jeopardy citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$20,010 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $20,010 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-19)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
196 W Sproul Rd · (610) 604-4400 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
721 W. Sproul Road · (610) 328-0033 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
721 W Sproul Rd · (610) 328-0029 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Jane Lownes Park, 615 Kennerly Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.7%16.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.3%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder4.5%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection5.2%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms24.5%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.5%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.1%17.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.2%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine80.5%93.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers12.0%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.6%25.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.3%17.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine21.5%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.4%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.1%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.241.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.771.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 368 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
53.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 53.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 150 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.7%CMS range 40.2–50.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.4%CMS range 10.3–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge53.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge58.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge54.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.9%CMS range 7.5–13.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.171.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.05
RN hours/ resident / day
0.62
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.01
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.68
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.85
RN hoursweekends
49.0%
Total nursing turnover
44.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 91.4 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.05 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.83 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.13 to 0.85 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-02)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, facility documentation and policy, and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to Resident R1 with a history of wandering, and at risk for elopement. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation to Resident R1 who eloped from the facility, crossed a high traffic street and was found by a member of the community in a lot across from the facility entrance, for one of four residents reviewed at risk for elopement (Resident R1). The deficiency was identified as Immediate Jeopardy past non-compliance. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Wander Management and Elopement Prevention updated March 2022, states, The facility will maintain the safety of residents who wander and/or are at risk for elopement. The staff will identify residents who are at risk for harm because of unsafe wandering (including elopement). The staff will implement a wander management system device as part of the plan of care. Resident care plan will include specific interventions to ensure safe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policies, review of facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that water temperatures in resident bathroom hand sinks were maintained at a safe temperature for one of two nursing units. This failure placed residents on the North Side nursing unit exposed to unsafe hot water temperature and at risk of serious injury from a burn. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. (North side nursing unit) Findings: Review of facility policy on Safety of Water Temperatures, under section Policy Statement revealed that tap water in the facility shall be kept within a temperature range to prevent scalding of residents. Under section Policy Interpretation and Implementation: Water heaters that service resident rooms, bathrooms, common areas, and tub/shower areas shall be set to temperatures of no more than 110°F (Fahrenheit) or the maximum allowable temperature per state regulation. #1. Maintenance staff is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a thorough fall investigation, including obtaining witness statements from the resident and the resident's roommate for one of two residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Review of Resident R117's clinical record revealed Resident R117 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of paraplegia (condition where a person loses movement and feeling in the lower half of their body, usually affecting both legs) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- prevents airflow to the lungs, causing breathing problems), and chronic pain syndrome. Review of Resident R117's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 23, 2025, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Review of facility incident report submitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview with staff and resident, and review of clinical record and facility's policy, it was determined that facility did not ensure to develop and implement a care plan related to assistive device and fall prevention measures for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident R69)Findings include: Review of facility policy 'Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans,' revised March 2022, indicates that the comprehensive, person-centered care plan describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being , including: the resident's stated goals upon admission and desired outcome, and reflects currently recognized standards of practice for problem areas and conditions. Review of Resident R69's clinical record revealed admission date of January 22, 2026, with medical history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (disease process that causes decreased ability of the lungs to perform), anxiety disorder, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen), muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility did not ensure development and implementation of a care plan related to the need for oxygen for 1 of 18 residents reviewed (Resident R10) Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, revised October 2010, states one is to verify a physician's order for the procedure in preparation for safe oxygen administration. Review of Resident R10's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses if chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive lung disease which makes breathing difficult), panlobular emphysema (chronic lung disease with noted uniform destruction of the air sacs used for gas exchange), and mild cognitive impairment. Resident was admitted on hospice care. Observation of Resident R10 on March 30, 2026 at 9:55 AM revealed resident was non-interviewable, was mouth breathing (breathing through the mouth) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, review of facility's policy and clinical record, it was determined that facility did not ensure hygiene care was provided as per resident's preference for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident R86)Findings include: Review of facility policy 'Activities of Daily Living,' revised April 2025, indicates its purpose is to provide residents with care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADL's). Review of Resident R86's clinical record revealed medical history of falls, multiple sclerosis (autoimmune disorder that affects the central nervous system), fracture of left lower extremity, asthma, muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of R86's Minimum Data Set (MDS- resident assessment of care needs), completed on January 16, 2026, revealed Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated that the resident was cognitive intact. Review of shower schedule for North unit revealed Resident R86 is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility documentation, and resident representative and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of four residents reviewed (Residents R16). Findings include: Review of Resident R16's clinical record revealed Resident R16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis (condition where damaged muscle tissue breaks down quickly and releases harmful substances into the blood), congestive heart failure (CHF- condition where the heart does not pump blood as well as it should, causing fluid to build up in the lungs and other parts of the body like the legs), and chronic kidney disease (long-term condition where the kidneys gradually lose their ability to filter waste and extra fluid from the blood). Review of Resident R16's Nutritional Risk Assessment, dated March 16, 2026, revealed the resident was at risk for malnutrition related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview with residents' and staff, review of policies and review of clinical records, it was determined that facility did not ensure residents' received adequate supervision and assistive device to prevent accidents for two of 18 residents reviewed. (Residents R69, R117) Findings include: Review of facility policy 'Bed Safety and Bed Rails,' revised August 2022, indicates that consideration is given to the resident's safety, medical conditions, comfort, and freedom of movement, as well as input from the resident and family regarding previous sleeping habits and bed environment. Further review of policy indicates that for the purpose of policy, bed rails include side rails, safety rails and grab/assist bars. Prior to the installation or use of a side or bed rail, alternatives to the use of side or bed rails are attempted. Alternatives may include: roll guards, foam bumpers, lowering the bed and/or use of concave mattress to reduce rolling off the bed. Review of Resident R69's Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility assessment and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the direct care staff and input from residents, resident representatives, and/or family members was included when conducting the facility assessment.Findings include: Review of the facility's facility assessment, dated January 09, 2025, revealed there was no indication that the facility involved direct care staff, input from residents, resident representatives, and/or family members. Interview with Employee E1, Administrator, on April 02, 2026, at approximately 10:00 a.m., confirmed there was no direct care staff, resident representatives, and/ or family members included in the facility assessment. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management28 Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d)(1) Nursing services

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility did not ensure a dressing covering a central line was changed as ordered by the physician for one of one resident review with a central line. (Resident R106) Findings Include: Review of Resident R106's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cutaneous abscess of right lower limb (usually caused by bacterial infection, a collection of pus within or under the skin), extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) resistance (resistance of a specific type of microorganism to a particular type of antibiotics, which cause infection), and methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus infection (type of staph infection that can be treated with penicillin-related antibiotics). Review of Resident R106's clinical records revealed Resident R106 was prescribed a course of IV (intravenous) antibiotic Cefazolin sodium starting on March 29, 2026, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, review of facility policy and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor and provide appropriate and timely intervention to prevent further weight loss for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident R1)Findings include: Review facility policy on Weight Assessment and Intervention revealed that under section Policy Statement: Resident weights are monitored for undesirable or unintended weight loss or gain under section policy interpretation and implementation. Under section Weight Assessment: #1. Residents are weighed on admission at intervals established by the interdisciplinary team #3 any weight change of 5% of more since the last weight assessments is retaken the next day for confirmation. #a. If the weight is verified nursing will immediately notify the dietitian. #4. Unless notified of significant weight change the dietitian will review the unit weight record monthly to follow individual weight trends over time. #5. The threshold for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of clinical record, facility investigation, review of policies and procedures, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident environment was free of accident hazard related to unlocked elevator providing access to a door that resident was able to leave the facility. (Resident R1). This deficiency was identified as past non-compliance.Findings Include:Review of facility policy Safety and Supervision of Residents, dated July 2017, revealed Safety risks and environmental hazards are identified on an ongoing basis through a combination of employee training, employee monitoring, and reporting processes; QAPI reviews of safety and incident/accident data; and facility- wide commitment to safety at all levels of the organization.Review of facility policy Wandering and Elopements, dated March 2019, revealed The facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-28 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, interviews with residents and staff and reviews of policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to provide foot care and treatment for one of eight residents reviewed. (Resident R1)Findings include: A review of the policy and procedures titled medication and treatment orders dated July 2016 revealed that orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with the principles of safe and effective writing. The policy indicated that only authorized licensed practitioners, or individuals authorized to take verbal orders from practitioners shall be allowed to write orders in the clinical record. The policy also said that verbal orders must be recorded immediately in the resident's clinical record. The order must include prescriber's last name, credentials and date and time of the order. A review of the policy and procedure titled consultant physician services dated February 2023 revealed that the consultant physician services must be inwriting and signed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, and family member and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide confidentiality of residents' personal health information during medication administration for two of three residents reviewed. (Residents R2 and R3). Findings include: Review of facility policy on Confidentiality of information and personal privacy with most recent revision date of October 2017, revealed that under section Policy Statement; our facility will protect and safeguard resident confidentiality and personal privacy. Under section Policy interpretation and implementation #1, the facility will safeguard the personal privacy and confidentiality of all residents and medical records. #4. Access to resident's personal and medical records will be limited to authorized staff and business associates. Interview with complainant revealed that when her husband Resident R1 was discharged home, medical records belonging to 2 other residents were included in her husband's discharge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview with staff and residents and review of facility provided documentation, it was determined that facility did not ensure residents received the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene and mobility for five out of 18 residents reviewed (Resident R35, R40, R65, R233, R13) Findings include: Review of facility's policy 'Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting,' revised March 2018, indicates that appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADL's independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: a. Hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care); b. Mobility (transfer and ambulation, including walking) Review of East side 7-3 shower schedule and skin checks revealed that Resident R35, in room [ROOM NUMBER]-A, was scheduled for shower on Tuesday, March 18, 2025 and Friday, March 21, 2025. Interview with nurse aide, Employee E4, on Monday,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that appropriate pain management was provided to a resident consistent with standards of professional practice for four of 18 residents reviewed (Residents R79, R290, R292 and R293). Findings include: Review of the facility Policy on Pain management revealed that the purpose of this procedure are to help the staff identify pain in the resident and to develop interventions that are consistent with the resident's goals and needs and that address. The underlying causes of pain under section General Guidelines: #1 The Pain Management program is based on facility wide commitment to appropriate assessment and treatment of pain, based and professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan and the residents' choices related to pain. Management. #2 being management is defined as the process of alleviating the residents pain based on his or her clinical condition and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility provided documentation and interview with residents and staff, it was determined that facility did not ensure there is sufficient nursing staff available at all times to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs based on 43 out of 50 grievances reviewed for months of March 2025, February 2025, January 2025, December 2024, October 2024. Findings include: Review of facility's policy 'Answering the Call Light,' indicates that procedure's purpose is to ensure timely response to residents' requests . staff are to answer the resident call system as soon as possible Interview with nurse aide, employee E4, on Monday, March 24, 2025 revealed that residents do not receive scheduled showers due to facility being short staffed. Interview with Resident R67, on Monday, March 24, 2025 revealed that he had an unwitnessed fall I his room due to waiting for assistance for a long time after pressing the call bell. Review of R67's progress notes, dated March 23, 2025 at 9:15 am, revealed that unwitnessed fall from bed to floor while transferring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records, review of facility policy, interview with residents and staff, it was determined that facility did not ensure to implement enhanced barrier precautions for four residents (Residents R14, R5, R70, R77), ensure that infection control standards were maintained during wound care for one resident, (Residenr R22), and did not ensure that tuberculosis testing was administered on entry to the facility as required for one resident (Resident R190) out of 18 residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of facility provided policy 'Enhanced Barrier Precautions,' revised March 2024, states Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) are used as an infection prevention and control intervention to reduce the transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms to residents, and signs are posted in the door or wall outside the resident room indicating the type of precautions and PPE (personal protective equipment) require; PPE is available outside of the resident rooms. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical record, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plan for one of eighteen residents reviewed related to weight changes, and one resident related to long-term antibiotic use (Residents R2 and R43). Findings Include: Review of clinical documentation for Resident R2 revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses which included, infection and inflammatory reaction due to unspecified internal joint prosthesis. Further review revealed a physician order for an antibiotic which read Bactrim DS Oral Tablet 800-160 MG (Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim) Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for joint infection chronic- no stop date. Review of progress notes for Resident R2 revealed a note from Registered Nurse Practitioner, Employee E8, dated March 26, 2025, which stated Left prosthetic joint infection- continue Bactrim DS (chronic). Review of the care plan for Resident R2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that care plans were revised in a timely manner for one of 18 records reviewed (Resident R81). Findings include: Review of clinical documentation revealed that Resident R81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including, of malignant neoplasm (cancer) of the prostate. Review of the resident's MDS (Minimum Data Set, a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated February 27, 2025, he died in the facility on February 27, 2025. Review of his physician orders revealed an order for DNR (Do Not Resuscitate), and an order for DNH (Do Not Hospitalize), both dated [DATE]. Review of his POLST (Pennsylvania Order for Life Saving Treatment, a document in which an individual expresses their wishes for end-of-life situations, such as whether or not they wish for CPR to be performed in the event that their heart stops) revealed that they wished for CPR (Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation) to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that standards of practice for pressure ulcer treatment were followed related to a physician not being informed of a missed wound treatment for one of 18 records reviewed (Resident R59). Findings include: Interview with the representative of the County Ombudsman Program, Employee E9, on March 26, 2025, at 2:10 p.m., revealed that Resident R59 had stated to her that his wound care had not been done on March 25, 2025, and that the nurse had told him it was due to not having access to the supplies. Review of the resident's March 2025 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) showed that March 25, 2025, the evening shift treatment to the resident's sacrum was documented as code 22, which the TAR indicated meant treatment not given. Review of the notes revealed that a note written by Employee E5, which indicated that the reason for not administering the treatment was not available. No explanation was provided in the note as to why the treatment was not available. No note was found…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility provided documentation and interview with staff, it was determined that facility did not ensure annual performance evaluation was completed for one nurse aide out of five nurse aides trainings reviewed (Employee E7) Findings include: Review of facility policy 'Performance Evaluations,' revised on September 2020, indicates that ' a performance evaluation will be completed on each employee at the conclusion of his/her 90-day probation period , and at least annually thereafter. Review of facility provided performance evaluations on Thursday, March 27, 2025 revealed that nurse aide, Employee E7 was hired on May 10, 2023; her last performance evaluation was on November 7, 2023. Finding confirmed with facility's Director of Nursing. 28 Pa Code 201.19(2) Personnel policies and procedures

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview with resident and staff, and review of clinical record and facility provided documentation, it was determined facility did not ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for two out of 18 residents reviewed (Resident R235, R288) Findings include: Interview with Resident R235 on Monday, March 24, 2025 at 1:35 pm, revealed that she did not receive her scheduled antibiotic on March 7, 2025 and March 8, 2025. Review of R235's clinical record revealed a physician order placed on February 26, 2025 for Daptomycin intravenous solution reconstituted 350 milligrams (mg), to use 1200 mg intravenously in the evening for bacterial skin infection for 26 days in 0.9% NSS ( Normal Saline Solution) parental solution 50 ml at rate 50ml/hr. Review of progress notes dated March 6, 2025 and March 7, 2025 indicate that antibiotic was not administered due to clogged port. Review of R235's electronic medication administration record revealed Daptomycin was not administered on March 6, 2025 and was not administered on March 7, 2025. Interview with Assistant Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that laboratory study results were communicated to the physician in a timely manner for one of 18 records reviewed (Resident R2). Findings include: Review of clinical documentation for Resident R2 revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, altered mental status, chronic pain, cognitive communication deficit, and morbid obesity. Review of progress notes revealed a physician note, dated March 11, 2025, at 1:01 p.m., signed by Medical Doctor, Employee E11, which stated that the resident reports dysuria (painful urination), pressure, [and] feeling as though she is not completely emptying. Spoke with team- will straight cath (straight catheterization is a temporary tube placed in the bladder for the purpose of emptying it or collecting a urine specimen) for urine [testing]. Review of laboratory results for Resident R2 revealed a urine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews with residents and staff, and clinical record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide as needed dental services for one of eighteen residents reviewed. (Resident R43) Findings include: Review of Resident R43's clinical record revealed that Resident R43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of but not limited to Anoxic Brain Damage, Tracheostomy Status. Review of Resident R43's annual MDS (minimum data set- a federally required resident assessment completed at a specific interval) dated March 18, 2025, Section GG0130. Self-Care, B. Oral hygiene: The ability to use suitable items to clean teeth. Dentures (if applicable): The ability to insert and remove dentures into and from the mouth and manage denture soaking and rinsing with use of equipment, was coded 01 indicating that Resident R43 was Dependent (Helper does ALL of the effort. Resident does none of the effort to complete the activity or the assistance of 2 or more helpers is required for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility provided documentation and interview with staff, it was determined that facility did not ensure one Performance Improvement Project was completed as required. Findings include: According to §483.75(e)(3) - the facility must conduct distinct performance improvement projects, based on the scope and complexity of facility services and available resources, identified as a result of the facility assessment. While the number and frequency of improvement projects may vary, facility must conduct at least one improvement project annually that focuses on high-risk or problem-prone areas, identified by the facility through data collection and analysis. Review of facility's 'Risk Identification and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement,' indicates that the facility reviews data gleaned from risk meetings during the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings. The QAPI committee will review data along with any suggestions and input from residents, staff, family members, and other stakeholders. The QAPI committee will prioritize opportunities for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-03 · tag F0772 — isolated
    Have an agreement with an approved laboratory to obtain services, if on-site laboratory services aren't provided.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that laboratory studies were promptly obtained as ordered by the physician for one of three clinical records reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of Resident R1's physician progress note dated November 22, 2024, indicated that resident was noted with hypotension and dehydration. Intravenous fluids were given and ordered to repeat BMP (basic metabolic panel blood test) tomorrow (November 23, 2024). Review of Resident R1's clinical records revealed the staff did not place an order in the electronic system to draw the lab. Further review of clinical record for Resident R1 revealed no evidence that the facility obtained the lab, and the results were obtained on November 22, 2024. Review of nurse's note for Resident R1 dated November 24, 2024, revealed that the resident was observed with weakness, in and out of consciousness and use of abdominal muscle to breath. Resident was transferred to the hospital per the family request. Interview with the Director of Nursing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents R1). Findings include: Review of Resident R1's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool), revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including muscle wasting, cognitive communication deficit, bed confinement status, and need for assistance with personal care. Continued review revealed that the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 0, which indicates that the resident was not cognitively intact. Review of Resident R1's clinical record, GG- Shower/Bathe Self indicated that resident refused a shower/or bath on 19 out of 30 days. Further review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that shower/bathe self (3-11/ 11-7) revealed that resident refused a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policy, and interviews with resident and staff , it was determined that the facility failed to provide a reasonable accommodation of needs for one of nine sampled residents. (Resident R7) Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Answering the call light not dated states, Be sue that the call light is plugged in and functioning at all times.: Review of Resident R7 order summary report revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] diagnosed with a fractured pelvis due to a fall at home and ordered that the resident be toe touch weight-bearing, (meaning the ability to touch the foot or toes to the floor without the affected limb providing support and weight bearing as tolerated in the lower left extremity). Interview with Resident R7 and his family member on August 28, 2024, at approximately 10:30 a.m. revealed on admission the resident was given a small bell to use in place of his call bell. The resident's room was down the hall, one of the last rooms,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, facility documentation, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents remained free from significant medication errors for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident R9). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications not dated states, The individual administering the medication checks the label three times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method of administration before giving the medication. Review of Resident R9's physician admission note dated August 1, 2024 indicated the resident presented to the emergency room on July 30, 2024 with left-sided weakness and balance issues. The resident reported lower extremity weakness to be progressive over the last month and associated with intermittent slurred speech and trouble swallowing. The resident reported earlier hospitalization at another hospital for the same symptoms. Continuing with the same note states to see therapy for left sided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-19 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received assistance with bathing for three of seven residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2 and R4). Findings include: Interview on August 19, 2024, at 9:12 a.m. Resident R1 stated that she did not receive a shower for a week after her admission to the facility. Resident R1 stated that she prefers to have a shower and not a bed bath or bedside basin. Review of Resident R1's care plan, dated initiated August 5, 2024, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had an activities of daily living deficit related to deconditioning. Continued review revealed that there was no indication of level of assistance needed or preferences related to bathing. Review of Resident R1's nurse aide [NAME] (instructions for nurse aide staff for performing resident care) revealed that the resident was scheduled to receive showers on Mondays and Thursdays during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, a review of facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator failed to effectively manage the facility related to hot water temperatures in one of two nursing units which resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation. (North Side Nursing Unit) Findings Include: Review of the job description for the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) revealed the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) primary purpose of the job position is to direct the day-to-day functions of the Center in accordance with current federal, state and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern nursing Centers to assure that the highest degree of quality care can be provided to our residents at all times. Observation and water temperature checks on the North Side nursing unit were conducted with the [NAME] President for Plant Operations, Employee E3 on July 1, 2024, from 9:03 a.m. to 10:09 a.m. in Resident rooms 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28,129, 30. The hot water temperature at the hand sink in the room mentioned above range from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on on the review of clinical records and facility documentation, observations, interview with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure an environment was free of potential hazards related to medications left at bedside, a fall incident, and no railing around the loading dock for three of 30 residents' records reviewed (Rooms R326, R328, R329). Findings include: Review of facility policy named, Safety and Supervision of Residents, initially adapted in 2001, stated; Resident safety and supervision and assistance to prevent accidents are facility-wide priorities .Resident supervision is a core component of the systems approach to safety. On [DATE] at 10:24 a.m. observation was made of Resident R326's room. Observation of the room revealed two medications bedside on the night stand. The medications at bed side included lactase enzyme 375 milligrams (mg) capsules and a bottle of Artificial Tears. Further observation of the lactase enzyme pill bottle revealed an expiration date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews with staff, and a review of facility policies and documentation, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: The Policy: Food Receiving and Storage, which was revised in November 2022, states, All foods stored in the refrigerator of freezer are covered, dated and labeled. An initial tour of the Food Service Department was conducted on May 14, 2024, at 9:30 a.m. with Employee E3, Food Service Director (FSD), which revealed the following: Observation in the mop room revealed the floor and walls were very dirty, the white mop sink was black with a heavy buildup of dirt and grime, and the floor was littered with debris and equipment. Observation in the kitchen near the pot sink revealed the walls were spattered with food particles and the sanitizer mount on the wall had a thick buildup of dirt and dust. Observation in the walk-in freezer revealed a box of breaded veal patties that was open and the inner…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-03 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility documents and resident clinical records and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents had the capacity to understand the terms of a binding arbitration agreement for three of nine residents reviewed (Resident R226, R227 and Resident R228). Findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2019, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact 8-12: moderately impaired 0-7: severe impairment Review of admission record indicated Resident R226 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R226's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated March 17, 2024, indicated the diagnoses of fracture and orthopedic aftercare and a BIMS score of 3 - severe impairment of cognition. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedure, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program, related with linen transportation, and personal protective equipment disposal for one of one resident observed during trancheotomy care. (Resident R56). Findings include: Observation on May 15, 2024, at 11:33 a.m., revealed that a Nurse Aide, Employee E15, was taking clean linen from the Linen Storeroom, located adjacent to Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], was holding the clean linen letting it to touch the Nurse Aide's uniform of her upper body area, and was carrying the linen the same manner, up to Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], located in the other nursing unit, for the use of residents. At the time of the finding, interviewed with nurse aide, Employee E15, and confirmed that the linen should have been transported without letting it touch the employee's clothing, to prevent contamination and to maintain infection control. Observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that residents were treated with dignity and respect for two of two residents reviewed. (Residents R13 and R47) Findings Include: Review of the Resident Rights policy with a revision date of October 2010 states, Purpose-To provide general guidelines for resident rights while caring for the resident. Preparation 1. Prior to having direct-care responsibilities for residents, staff must have appropriate in-service training on resident rights, including: a. Preventing, recognizing and reporting resident abuse; b. Resident dignity and respect; c. Resident notification of rights, services, and health/medical condition; d. Protection of resident funds and personal property; e. Confidentiality of protected health information; f. Resident right of refusal (medications and treatments); g. Use of restraints; h. Resident freedom of choice; i. Resident/Family participation in care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 16 out of 21 residents reviewed. (Residents R42, R44, R28, R4, R63, R43, R329, R52, R35, R51, R19, R7, R44, R58, R30 and R34). Findings Include: An initial tour was taken on May 14, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. of n the East and North units revealed the following: Observation of Resident R35's room revealed an air conditioning unit that had liquid spilled on top of it. Observation of Resident R51's room at 10:04 a.m. revealed her call bell hanging on the wall and not within reach of her, this was confirmed by licensed nurse, Employee E6 at 10:08 a.m. A tour of Resident R42's room revealed trash on the floor and linens that were dirty. An interview with the resident revealed the facility phone in his room doesn't work. The resident stated the phone has not been working for about two weeks. A tour of Resident R51's room revealed the call bell on the floor out of reach of the resident, this was confirmed at 10:21 a.m. by licensed nurse Employee E6. Further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, interviews with staff and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for three of 21 resident reviewed (Residents R32, R46 and Resident 48). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered revised on March 2022, states that it includes measurable objective and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs and is developed and implemented for each resident. Review of Resident R32's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of Type Two Diabetes Mellitus (a chronic condition that causes high blood glucose levels (hyperglycemia). Review of Resident R32's progress notes revealed on February 9, 2024 the resident was transferred to the hospital when he was hypoglycemic (low blood glucose levels) and found with fecal impaction (chronic constipation, hard dry stool stuck…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with residents and staff it was determined the facility did not ensure physicians order were followed related to medication administration and care to a pleurax catheter for two of 21 residents reviewed. (Residents R326 and R329) Findings Include: During Resident Council held on May 15, 2024 at 2:00 p.m. Resident R326 stated during medication administration this morning, she dropped a pill, told the nurse, the nurse did not come back with a replacement pill, and she still hadn't gotten it for the day. The resident was asked by the surveyor if she knew what pill it was and she stated, No, but I have it still I saved it in my room At the end of Resident Council, the surveyor approached licensed nurse, Employee E5 and stated what Resident R326 had said during Resident Council. The surveyor went into Resident R326's accompany by licensed nurse, Employee E5. Observation of resident's room on May 15, 2024 at 2:40 p.m. with Licensed nurse, Employee E5 revealed a purple and orange pill sitting on the resident bed-side tray table. Licensed nurse, Employee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and interviews with staff it was determined that the facility failed to monitor a resident's needs to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one of 21 residents reviewed for nutritional status. (Resident R13). Findings Include: Review of the facilities policy titled, Weight Assessment and Intervention with a revision dated on March 2022 state, Resident weights are monitored for undesirable and unintended weight loss or gain. Review of Resident R13's clinical record revealed the diagnoses of muscle wasting and atrophy, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, diverticulitis of large intestine without perforation or abscess without bleeding, unspecified hearing loss, abnormalities of gait and mobility, dysphagia, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident R13's clinical record revealed that the resident was to receive feeding assistance of 1:1 at all meals. Review of Resident R13's hospital discharge records from April 3, 2024 revealed the resident has a weight recorded on April 4, 2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident council interviews, review of the established meal time schedule, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a nourishing snack was provided when in between meals for five of 21 residents reviewed. (Residents R275, R22, R326, R14, and R13). Findings Include: Resident Council was held on May 15, 2024 at 2:00 p.m. When asked if the resident's receive snacks in the evening four out of five residents stated that they have never received a snack in the evening. Review of Resident R275's evening snack record revealed, no snack was given on May 14, 2024. Review of Resident R22's evening snack record revealed, no snack was given on April 20, April 26. May 1, May 2, May 4, May 5, May 14, 2024. Review of Resident R326's evening snack record revealed, no snack was given on May 11, May 14, and May 16, 2024. Review of Resident R14's evening snack record revealed, no snack was given on May 6, May 9, and May 14, 2024. Review was made of Resident R13's clinical record due to the resident having a significant weight loss over the period of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and an interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that garbage and refuse was disposed of properly. Finding include: An initial tour of the Food Service Department was conducted on May 14, 2024, at 9:30 a.m. with Employee E3, Food Service Director (FSD), which revealed the following: Observation in the receiving area revealed one of three dumpsters with the lid open revealing the contents including cardboard boxes. Further observations revealed that the employee smoking area was adjacent to the loading dock and that the ground all around the loading dock was littered with hundreds of cigarette butts. Interview with the FSD on May 14, 2024, at 9:35 a.m. confirmed the above findings. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the loading dock was in safe conditions. Findings include: Observations during the tour of the kitchen on May 14, at 9:30 a.m. revealed a loading dock door that was open leading to the receiving area where there was a wooden loading dock structure that was five feet off the ground with no railing or chain to restrict access and provide safety for staff, delivery drivers and anyone who may exit the rear door including wandering residents. Interview with Food Service Director, Employee E3, on May 14, at 9:30 a.m. confirmed that the loading dock door was open due to receiving a delivery that morning, and that the loading dock structure does not have any safety railing and that Dietary staff receive deliveries there daily. The FSD indicated that while this is an employee only area, residents have entered the hallway leading to the receiving area to come to the kitchen and that if no one was in the area and the receiving door was open, they could wander out to the loading dock and fall.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedure, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to handle and transport linens to prevent the spread of infection on one of two nursing units. (East wing) Findings include: Observation at the East Wing of the facility, on March 201, 2024, at 10:07 a.m., revealed that a Nurse Aide, Employee E6, was transporting clean linen for the use of residents by holding the linens letting it to touch the Nurse aide's uniform. Interviewed conducted with Nurse aide, Employee E6, at the timed of the interview, it was confirmed that the linens should have been transported without letting it touch the employee's clothing to prevent contamination and to maintain infection control practices. 28 Pa Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa Code 211.12 (d)(1)(5) Nursing services

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to developed a baseline care plan for one of six residents reviewed related to a community-acquired infectious disease (Resident R1). Findings: Review of the clinical record for Resident R1 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], for skilled nursing care post discharge from an acute care hospital. At the time of admission the resident had been diagnosed with an infection (clostridium difficile - an inflammation of the colon caused by a bacterial infection) and was on an antibiotic therapy regimen. Review of hospital documentation dated September 15, 2024 at the time of discharged noted You had a c-difficile infection for which we are treating you with oral Vancomycin and holding off other antibiotics. Review of Resident R1's care plan revealed that a care plan for c-difficile infection was not developed until September 18, 2024. 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(1)(5) Nursing services 28 Pa. Code…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control practices related to the admission to the facility of a resident with a community-acquired infectious disease for one of six residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings: Review of the clinical record for resident R1 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], for skilled nursing care post discharge from an acute care hospital. At the time of admission the resident had been diagnosed with an infection (clostridium difficile - an inflammation of the colon caused by a bacterial infection) and was on an antibiotic therapy regimen. An entry in the progress notes dated September 18, 2023, documented that the resident was transferred to a private room and that transmission-based precautions were implemented. An interview was conducted with the facility's infection Preventionist Employee E3 on February 1, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. confirmed that there was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility policies and procedures, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an alleged allegation involving suspected abuse was reported, as required, to the Department of Health for one of eight residents reviewed (Residents R8). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating revised September 2022, stated that, If resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law. The policy further states that the administrator or the individual making the allegation immediately reports his or her suspicion to the following persons or agencies: the state licensing agency; ombudsman; resident representative; adult protective services; law enforcement; physician and medical director.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-07 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that essential equipment related to vital signs was readily available for use by nursing staff on two of two nursing units (North and East nursing units). Findings include: Observation on August 3, 2023, from 8:35 a.m. through 9:00 a.m. of morning medication pass on the North nursing unit, revealed Employee E11, licensed nurse, prepare and administer medications to Residents R35 and R60. During medication administration, Employee E11, licensed nurse, was observed obtaining both Resident R35 and R60's blood pressure and heart rate using a wrist blood pressure monitor and their oxygen levels using a fingertip pulse oximeter. Interview, on August 3, 2023, at 8:45 a.m. Employee E11, licensed nurse, stated that she brings her own equipment, including the wrist blood pressure monitor and fingertip pulse oximeter, from home because there was no equipment available at the facility to use to obtain resident vital signs. Continued observation, on August 3, 2023, at 8:47 a.m. Employee E11,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies and documentation, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered per physician's orders for three of 27 residents reviewed (Residents R59, R112 and R60). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Unavailable Medication dated June 2021, revealed, the facility will make every effort to ensure that a medication ordered for the resident is available to meet their needs. Continued review revealed that if a medication is unavailable, nursing staff shall notify the physician, notify the pharmacy, attempt to obtain the medication from the facility's automated medication dispensing system and provide alternative medications as recommended. Observation on August 3, 2023, at 8:53 a.m. of morning medication pass on the North nursing unit, revealed Employee E11, licensed nurse, prepare and administer medications for Resident R60. Employee E11, licensed nurse, stated that Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that respiratory therapy treatments and equipment were provided in a timely manner for one of three residents reviewed related to respiratory care (Resident R59). Findings include: Review of Resident R59's MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool)assessment, dated July 5, 2023, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including coronary artery disease (damage in the heart's major blood vessels), aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech, caused by brain damage), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe) and chronic respiratory failure (a condition in which a person's lungs cannot release oxygen into and/or remove carbon dioxide from the blood). Review of Resident R59's hospital discharge records, dated July 1, 2023, revealed respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-09-11 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interviews with staff and review of facility documentation determined the facility failed to notify a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of residents' transfers and/or discharges in writing for 2 of 2 months reviewed (July and August 2024). Findings include: Review of facility's documentation of the list of residents transferred or discharged from the facility in the month of July 2024 revealed the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman did not receive a copy of the notice sent to the resident and/or the resident's representative before these transferred or discharges occurred. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(2) Management

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$20,010 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $12,844 — penalty dated 2024-08-19
  • $7,166 — penalty dated 2024-06-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.3-1.3 vs chain
The other 86 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avalon Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHamilton, NJ 1 of 5Bay Harbor Post Acute Healthcare CenterSalisbury, MD 1 of 5Blueberry Hill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CtrBeverly, MA 1 of 5Canterbury Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5Cape Cod Post Acute CareBrewster, MA 1 of 5Crest Pointe Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterPt Pleasant, NJ 1 of 5Highland Park Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterChelsea, MA 1 of 5Mount Holly Rehabilitation & Healthcare CenterLumberton, NJ 1 of 5Nashua Post Acute CareNashua, NH 2 of 5Arbor Ridge Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWayne, NJ 2 of 5Atlantic View Post AcuteNewport News, VA 2 of 5Bayview Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterNorth Kingstown, RI 2 of 5Collingswood Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRockville, MD 2 of 5Elmhurst Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterProvidence, RI 2 of 5Graduate Post AcutePhiladelphia, PA 2 of 5Heritage Hills Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSmithfield, RI 2 of 5Laurel Brook Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMount Laurel, NJ 2 of 5Lawrence Rehab & Hcc/The Meadows At LawrenceLawrenceville, NJ 2 of 5Lawrence Rehabilitation HospitalLawrenceville, NJ 2 of 5Lighthouse Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRevere, MA 2 of 5Lincolnwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterNorth Providence, RI 2 of 5North End Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterBoston, MA 2 of 5Orchard Hill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Palm Springs Post AcuteChelmsford, MA 2 of 5Riverview Healthcare CommunityCoventry, RI 2 of 5Roosevelt Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterPhiladelphia, PA 2 of 5Southampton Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5West Chester Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWest Chester, PA 2 of 5Westgate Hills Rehab & Healthcare CtrBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Willow Brook Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWilmington, MA 2 of 5YORK Post AcuteYorktown, VA 3 of 5Alexandria Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 3 of 5Aspen Hill Rehabiliation & Healthcare CenterHaverhill, MA 3 of 5Belmont Bay Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWoodbridge, VA 3 of 5Brighton Post Acute CareBrighton, MA 3 of 5Cambridge Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMoorestown, NJ 3 of 5Capitol Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHarrisburg, PA 3 of 5Chelsea Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterGoochland, VA 3 of 5Exton Post AcuteExton, PA 3 of 5Hampden Post AcuteWilbraham, MA

Showing 40 of 86; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
QUINTO DELTA LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST89%since 06/11/2020
TRYKO DELTA HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST67%since 06/12/2020
GRAHAM, LAURAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/11/2020
POSEN, MINDEEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/11/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$958K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 3%Medicare 55%Other / private 42%

This home reported $958K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$491per resident / day
operating cost
$14,918per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$568per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395690. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next