No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Capitol Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

4000 Linglestown Road, Harrisburg, PA 17112 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 138 certified beds · (717) 657-0700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (717) 657-0700 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0606) — cited Nov 2025
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0606), cited Nov 2025
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4000 Linglestown Rd · (717) 231-8867 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1600 Alexandra Ln · (717) 545-9188 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2047 Eg Dr · (717) 695-3517 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2293 Forest Hills Dr · (717) 657-5635 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.9%16.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.1%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms43.8%10.8%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.1%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.6%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.8%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.9%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%4.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.5%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.8%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine72.3%68.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.2%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.0%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.351.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.651.181.80better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 352 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
68.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.35U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 68.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 113 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.1%CMS range 41.4–52.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 8.8–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge68.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge63.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge54.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 5.3–10.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.69
RN hours/ resident / day
0.72
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.08
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.49
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.51
RN hoursweekends
49.3%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 138 beds and averages 127.8 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-14)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-09)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident for six of 24 residents reviewed (Residents 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10).Findings include:Review of the facility policy, titled Administering Medications with a last revised date of April 2019, revealed 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. 7. Medications are to be administered within one hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified.Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypothyroidism (when your thyroid gland does not make enough thyroid hormone to meet your body's needs) and depression (a serious mood disorder that involves persistent sadness and a loss of interest in daily activities).Review of Resident 5's physician orders revealed the following orders: Zyprexa oral tablet 2.5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, document review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a resident the right to voice a grievance to the facility and make prompt efforts by the facility to resolve the grievance for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 4).Findings include:Review of the facility policy, titled Grievances/Complaints, Filing with a last revised date of April 2027, revealed, 1. Any resident, family member, or appointed resident representative may file a grievance or complaint concerning the care, treatment, or behavior of other residents, staff members, theft of property, or any other concerns regarding his or her stay at the facility. Grievances also may be voiced or filed regarding care that has not been furnished. 5. Grievances and/or complaints may be submitted orally or in writing and may be filed anonymously. 10. The grievance officer and stall will take immediate action to prevent further potential violations of resident rights while the alleged violation is being investigated.During an interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observations, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff implement infection control policies to prevent the spread of infection for three of four residents observed on contact precautions (Residents 1, 2, and 3).Findings include:Review of the facility policy, titled Isolation - Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions with a last revised date of September 2022, revealed 5. When a resident is placed on transmission-based precautions, appropriate notification is placed on the room entrance door and on the front of the chart so that personnel and visitors are aware of the need for and the type of precaution. A. The signage informs the staff of the type of CDC precaution(s), instructions for use of PPE, and/or instructions to see a nurse before entering the room.Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included diabetes (a chronic condition where the body has trouble regulating blood sugar) and hypertension (high blood pressure).Review of Resident 2's clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-14 · tag F0554 — pattern
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to determine a resident's right to self-administer medications was clinically appropriate for one of one residents reviewed for self-administration of medications (Resident 103).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Self-Administration of Medications, dated February 2021, revealed, in part, If it is deemed safe and appropriate for a resident to self -administer medications, this is documented in the medical record and the care plan. The decision that a resident can safely self-administer medications is re-assessed periodically based on changes in the resident's medical and/or decision-making status. Review of Resident 103's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) and depression. Review of Resident 103's physician orders revealed an order for May keep poured meds at bedside until he is able to take them, dated May 29, 2024. Review of Resident 103's care plan revealed a focus for I chose to self-administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-14 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — pattern
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, review of select employee files, and a staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to verify if individuals have been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment by a court of law; have had a finding entered into the state nurse aide registry concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of property; or have a disciplinary action in effect against his or her professional license by a state licensure body as a result of a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of resident property for four of five employee files reviewed (Employees 5, 6, 7, and 8).Findings include:Review of facility policy, titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation Prevention Program, last reviewed October 9, 2025, read, in part, Conduct employee background checks and not knowingly employ or otherwise engage any individual who has: been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, facility policy reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly label drugs in one of three medication carts observed (North Unit West); failed to store medications properly in one of three medication carts observed (North Unit West); and failed to discard expired medications in one of three medication carts observed (Guild Unit) and one of two medication rooms observed (South Unit).Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Administering Medications, dated April 2019, revealed, in part, 13. The expiration/beyond use date on the medication label is checked prior to administering. When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened is recorded on the container. Review of facility policy, titled Medication Labeling and Storage, dated February 2023, revealed, in part, 5. Multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed (e.g., needle punctured) are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial. Observation of the North Unit [NAME] Medication Cart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, document review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and home-like interior on one of three nursing units (three shower rooms on the north unit and one resident bathroom on the north unit).Findings include: During an interview with Resident 24 on November 12, 2025, at 11:00 AM, the resident stated that the shower room in the northwest hall needed to be repaired; there were holes in the flooring. During an interview with Resident 120 on November 12, 2025, at 11:30 AM, the resident stated that the shower room on the northeast hall needed to be cleaned. Observation in the Northwest shower room on November 12, 2025, at 11:45 AM, revealed there were holes in the flooring an inch and a half a quarter way around the drain (down to the tile floor) and in two areas in front of the shower: an inch and a half by four inches and two by three inches. Observation in the Northeast front shower room on November 12, 2025, at 11:45 AM, revealed the bottom of the shower curtain contained black…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, facility policy review, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reviewed and revised for two of 30 residents reviewed (Residents 5 and 84).Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-centered, revised March 2022, revealed, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Review of facility policy, titled Isolation- Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions, revised September 2022, failed to reveal any expectation of adding transmission-based precautions to a resident's care plan. Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included depression, dementia (a chronic disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease, and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning), and anxiety disorder (mental health disorder characterized by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services necessary for care dependent residents for two of five residents reviewed (Residents 1 and 2).Findings Include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included heart failure (a condition where the heart cannot pump blood effectively enough to meet the body's needs) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident 1's comprehensive care plan under the focus section for Activities of Daily Living (ADL), revealed an intervention that Resident 1 required total assistance with eating and drinking, initiated on June 25, 2025. Further review of Resident 1's care plan, under the focus section for nutrition, revealed an intervention to provide feeding assistance at meals, initiated on April 18, 2024.Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed an eating task with a 30 day look back from August 25, 2025, through September 22, 2025 revealed that Resident 1 did not receive the required assistance with eating on the following dates:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent infection of a pressure ulcer for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings Include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included heart failure (a condition where the heart cannot pump blood effectively enough to meet the body's needs) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Further review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed that the Resident had a stage 4 pressure ulcer on the sacral region. Review of Resident 1's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for June 2025, revealed an order to change wound vac (Vacuum-assisted closure - a medical device that uses negative pressure to remove drainage from wounds and promote healing) three times a week, wash with normal saline, pack with black foam drape and set negative pressure to 125 mmHg (millimeters of mercury). Dust surrounding skin with over the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included anxiety disorder (excessive fear or apprehension about real or perceived threats) and depression (persistent feelings of sadness, loss of interest in activities, and a range of emotional, physical and cognitive symptoms). Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed she was ordered Lorazepam 0.5 milligrams (mg) one time daily for anxiety for six months, with a start date of November 4, 2024 and Lorazepam 0.5 mg every 12 hours as needed (PRN). Review of Resident 2's May 2025 medication administration record (MAR) revealed Resident 2's daily Lorazepam order stopped on May 3, 2025 and a new order did not start until May 13, 2025. Review of the controlled drug record for the Resident 2's Lorazepam revealed Employee 1 continued to sign out the medication for six days after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper monitoring to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Weight Assessment and Intervention, last reviewed March 29, 2025, read, in part, Resident weights are monitored for undesirable or unintended weight loss or gain. Residents are weighed upon admission and at intervals established by the interdisciplinary team. Weights are recorded in each unit's weight record chart and in the individual's medical record. Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment is retaken the next day for confirmation. If the weight is verified, nursing will immediately notify the dietitian in writing. Care planning for weight loss or impaired nutrition is a multidisciplinary effort. Individualized care plans shall address the identified cause of weight loss, goals and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to document physician ordered medication administrations in the clinical record for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 6). Findings include: A review of the clinical record for Resident 6 revealed diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a form of diabetes that is characterized by high blood sugar, insulin resistance, and relative lack of insulin) and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). Further review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], post-hospitalization for sepsis (bacterial blood stream infection). The Resident was admitted with a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) to administer intravenous medications. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident 6 revealed the following intravenous (IV) flushes were not signed off as completed: Sodium Chloride 0.9%, use 10 milliliters (ml) to flush IV for PICC maintenance on December 28, 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care and services were provided in a manner that enhanced resident dignity for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included benign prostatic hyperplasia (a condition in which the flow of urine is blocked due to the enlargement of prostate gland), dementia (a chronic disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease, marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning), and anxiety disorder (a persistent feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease). Observation of Resident 1 on December 23, 2024, at 11:47 AM, revealed he was sitting in a dining area with other residents, and a yellow puddle consistent with urine appeared underneath his chair. Further observation in the dining area on December 23, 2024, at 12:10 PM, revealed Resident 1 wheeling away from the dining area and Employee 1 (Nurse Aide) wheeled him back over to the table where he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement resident-directed care and treatment consistent with the resident's comprehensive plan of care for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Perineal Care, last revised February 2018, read, in part, The purpose of this procedure is to provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, to prevent infections and skin irritation, and to observe the resident's skin condition. Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. Assemble the equipment and supplies as needed. Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH- a condition in which the flow of urine is blocked due to the enlargement of prostate gland), dementia (a chronic disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease, marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning), and anxiety disorder (a persistent feeling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-09 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for four of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 11, 17, 91, and 101). Findings include: Review of Resident 11's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included dementia (irreversible, progressive degenerative disease of the brain, resulting in loss of reality contact and functioning ability) and age-related osteoporosis (occurs when bones become weaker and more fragile due to the aging process). Further review of Resident 11's clinical record revealed that Resident 11 had a fall on February 18, 2024, without injury. A review of Resident 11's Quarterly MDS (minimum data set-periodic assessment) dated April 16, 2024, was marked for a fall with major injury. Further review of the clinical record failed to reveal any documentation of a fall with major injury. The clinical record for Resident 11 revealed that on April 4, 2024, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observation, clinical record review, and resident representative and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reviewed and revised for four of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 65, 102, 106, and 113), and failed to give the opportunity to participate in the development, review, and revision of his/her care plan for four of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 41, 73, 91, and 101). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, with a last revised date of March 2022, and last review date of June 17, 2024, read, in part, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change; 1. The interdisciplinary team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice when administering medications for five of 22 residents reviewed on the East Wing (Residents 11, 21, 43, and 55), and that physician orders are discontinued for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 99). Findings Include: Review of Resident 11's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypothyroidism (thyroid doesn't produce enough thyroid hormone) and age-related osteoporosis (occurs when bones become weaker and more fragile due to the aging process). A review of Resident 11's clinical record revealed she was ordered Levothyroxine 75 mcg (micrograms) daily at 6:00 AM. A review of Resident 11's medication administration record failed to reveal that the medication was initialed by Employee 10 as administered on October 6, 2024, at 6:00 AM. Review of Resident 21's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypothyroidism (thyroid doesn't produce enough thyroid hormone) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, facility document review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to administer the correct dosage of medication for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 41); and failed to ensure that physician's orders were implemented for three of 22 residents on the East Wing (Residents 69, 87, 89). Findings include: A review of the facility policy, titled Administering Medications, last revised April 2019, revealed that the individual administering the medications records in the resident's medical record; the date and the time the medication was administered; the dosage; the signature and title of the person administering the medication. The individual administering medication checks the label three times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right route of administration before giving the medication. Review of Resident 41's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included dementia (a chronic disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease, and marked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records related to dialysis communication for one of two residents reviewed for dialysis (Resident 77). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled End stage renal disease, Care of a Resident with, last revised September 2010, read, in part, Residents with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) will be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care. Education and training of staff includes, specifically: The nature and clinical management of ESRD; The type of assessment data that is to be gathered about the resident's condition on a daily or per shift basis; Agreements between this facility and the contracted ESRD facility include all aspects of how the resident's care will be managed, including: How information will be exchanged between the facilities. The resident's comprehensive care plan will reflect the resident's needs related to ESRD/dialysis care. Review of Resident 77's clinical record revealed diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation; and determine that drug records are in order and that account of all controlled drugs is maintained and periodically reconciled for three of three residents reviewed (Resident 63, 117, and 119). Findings include: Review of facility provided policy, Discarding and Destroying Medications, revised [DATE], revealed, 10. The medication disposition record contains, as a minimum, the following information: a. The resident's name. b. The name and strength of the medication. c. The prescription number (if any). d. The name of the dispensing pharmacy. e. Date medication destroyed. f. The quantity destroyed. g. Method of destruction. h. Reason for destruction. i. Signature of witnesses. 11. Completed medication disposition records are kept on file in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing of a pressure ulcer for one of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident 91). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Dressings, Dry/Clean, with a last revised date of September 2013, and a last review date of June 17, 2024, revealed, in part, Steps in Procedure 7. Pull glove over dressing and discard into plastic or biohazard bag. 8. Wash and dry your hands thoroughly. 9. Open dry, clean dressing(s) by pulling corners of the exterior wrapping outward, touching only the exterior surface. 17. Apply the ordered dressing. Also, section titled Documentation indicated The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record, treatment sheet or designated wound form: 1. The date and time the dressing was changed; 3. The name and title (or initials) of the individual changing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor hydration status precisely and effectively for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 14). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Encouraging and Restricting Fluids, last revised October 2010, read, in part, The purpose of this procedure is to provide the resident with amount of fluids necessary to maintain optimum health. This may include encouraging or restricting fluids. Review the resident's care plan and/or your daily assignment sheet to assess for any special needs of the resident. Follow specific instructions concerning fluid intake or restrictions. Be accurate when recording fluid intake. Review of Resident 14's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (CHF- a long-term condition that happens when your heart can't pump blood well enough to meet your body's needs), chronic kidney disease (a condition characterized by a gradual loss of kidney function), and hypertension…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for five of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 17, 35, 39, 94, and 119). Findings Include: Review of Resident 17's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a common lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems) and dependence on supplemental oxygen (cannot live with supplemental oxygen). Review of Resident 17's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set is part of federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes) dated November 26, 2023, Section O0100. Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs, C1. Oxygen Therapy revealed that Resident 17 did not receive oxygen therapy during the previous 14 days. Review of Resident 17's electronic medical record, in a section labeled vital signs, revealed that Resident 17 had been using…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observations, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement resident-directed care and treatment consistent with the resident's physician orders and care plan for five of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 113, 335, 371, and 372). Findings include: Review of Resident 113's medical record revealed diagnoses that included: peripheral vascular disease (reduced circulation of blood to a body part, other than the brain or heart, due to a narrowed or blocked blood vessel, osteomyelitis (infection of the bone), and muscle weakness Review of Resident 113's physician orders revealed an order for Heel lift boots to bilateral feet every shift, with a start date of December 11, 2023. Review of Resident 113's care plan on December 18, 2023, revealed a focus area I have impaired skin integrity and am at risk for pressure areas (pressure area/PU- wound that occurs related to prolonged pressure against the skin) related to PU L heel, recent toe amputation on right foot, malnutrition, Left Heel Stage 1 initiated October 30,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of meal extension sheets (forms that reveal what foods and quantities should be served to each diet), and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure therapeutic diets (meal plans that control the intake of certain foods or nutrients) were provided for the lunch meal on December 20, 2023. Findings include: Review of the meal extension sheets revealed that residents on therapeutic diets including the consistent carbohydrate diet, heart healthy diet, and 2 gram sodium diets, should have been served 4 ounces (oz - unit of measure) of soup rather than 6 oz. Further review of the meal extension sheets revealed that residents on the therapeutic diets including the renal diet, heart healthy diet, and 2 gram sodium diets, should be served spaghetti and meatballs without sauce, and served 1 oz of low sodium gravy instead. Observation of lunch meal tray line on December 20, 2023, at 12:19 PM, revealed Resident 40 was prescribed a 2 gram sodium diet, was served spaghetti and meatballs with tomato sauce, and was not served…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 330). Findings include: Review of Resident 330's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included essential hypertension (high blood pressure) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). Review of Resident 330's clinical record reveals they were admitted on [DATE], from [NAME] State Health Rehabilitation Hospital. Review of clinical records received from [NAME] State Health Rehabilitation Hospital revealed Resident 330 had a stage four sacral pressure ulcer, with an onsite date of October 30, 2023. Review of a skin and wound evaluation completed on Resident 330 on December 14, 2023, revealed wound measurements with a length…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise the resident plan of care for two of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 3 and 113). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, with a last revised date of March 2022, and last review date of June 2023, revealed: 11. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents' conditions change. Review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included type II diabetes (disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high, but does not require the use of insulin), heart failure (condition that develops when your heart doesn't pump enough blood for your body's needs), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident 3's care plan revealed a care plan focus that indicated I am currently being treated for Shingles (a viral disease characterized by a painful skin rash with blisters in a localized area), with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive services consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 80). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled End Stage Renal Disease, Care of a Resident, (undated) with a last review date of June 2023, revealed, Residents with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) will be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care. 1. Staff caring for residents with ESRD, including residents receiving dialysis care outside of the facility, shall be trained in the care and special needs of these residents. Review of Resident 80's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included dementia (a chronic disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease, and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning), end stage renal disease (ESRD - condition in which a person's kidneys cease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with professional standards, including refrigeration, for one of two medication rooms observed (South Hall). Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage, with revision date of February 2023, revealed Multi-dose vials that have been opened or acceded (e.g., needle punctured) are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial. An observation of a medication storage room in the South Hall, on December 20, 2023, at 12:01 PM revealed medication refrigerator number four contained one open vial of Aplisol (diagnostic agent used to test for Tuberculosis) with no open date and one open vial of Alfuia (Influenza vaccine) with no open date. Licensed Practical Nurse 13 (LPN 13), confirmed the vials should have been dated when opened and she removed the vials from refrigerator four. Further observation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident council meetings and resident grievance, completion of meal test tray, review of select facility test tray form, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide foods that were at appetizing temperatures at one of one meals. Findings include: Review of facility document, titled Test Tray, revealed that hot foods and hot beverages should be served at or above 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F - a unit of measure), and cold foods and beverages should be served at or below 41 degrees F. Interview with Resident 373 on December 18, 2023, at 10:03 AM, revealed her food is often served cold. Interview with Resident 372 on December 18, 2023, at 11:47 AM, revealed the food is often served cold. Review of facility grievance logs revealed Resident 373 filed a grievance on December 10, 2023, about her food being cold and, when the facility inquired if it was an isolated incident, she stated sometimes her food is cold. Review of November 2023 Food Committee Meeting minutes revealed Resident 105 complained his soup is served cold.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff implemented infection control policies to prevent the spread of infection by wearing required PPE (personal protective equipment) on two of three employees observed (Employees 1 and 2). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Isolation - Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions, with a revision date of September 2022, revealed in a section labeled Contact Precautions, 7. Staff and visitors wear gloves (clean, non-sterile) when entering the room. a. While caring for a resident, staff will change gloves after having contact with infective material (for example, fecal material and wound drainage). 8. Staff and visitors wear a disposable gown upon entering the room and remove before leaving the room and avoid touching potentially contaminated surfaces with clothing after gown is removed. Observation of Resident 18's room on December 18, 2023, at 10:00 AM, revealed a PPE container hanging on the door and a sign that said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
Health inspection 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 86 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avalon Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHamilton, NJ 1 of 5Bay Harbor Post Acute Healthcare CenterSalisbury, MD 1 of 5Blueberry Hill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CtrBeverly, MA 1 of 5Canterbury Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5Cape Cod Post Acute CareBrewster, MA 1 of 5Crest Pointe Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterPt Pleasant, NJ 1 of 5Highland Park Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterChelsea, MA 1 of 5Mount Holly Rehabilitation & Healthcare CenterLumberton, NJ 1 of 5Nashua Post Acute CareNashua, NH 2 of 5Arbor Ridge Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWayne, NJ 2 of 5Atlantic View Post AcuteNewport News, VA 2 of 5Bayview Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterNorth Kingstown, RI 2 of 5Collingswood Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRockville, MD 2 of 5Elmhurst Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterProvidence, RI 2 of 5Graduate Post AcutePhiladelphia, PA 2 of 5Heritage Hills Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSmithfield, RI 2 of 5Laurel Brook Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMount Laurel, NJ 2 of 5Lawrence Rehab & Hcc/The Meadows At LawrenceLawrenceville, NJ 2 of 5Lawrence Rehabilitation HospitalLawrenceville, NJ 2 of 5Lighthouse Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRevere, MA 2 of 5Lincolnwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterNorth Providence, RI 2 of 5North End Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterBoston, MA 2 of 5Orchard Hill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Palm Springs Post AcuteChelmsford, MA 2 of 5Riverview Healthcare CommunityCoventry, RI 2 of 5Roosevelt Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterPhiladelphia, PA 2 of 5Southampton Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5Springfield Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterSpringfield, PA 2 of 5West Chester Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWest Chester, PA 2 of 5Westgate Hills Rehab & Healthcare CtrBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Willow Brook Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWilmington, MA 2 of 5YORK Post AcuteYorktown, VA 3 of 5Alexandria Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 3 of 5Aspen Hill Rehabiliation & Healthcare CenterHaverhill, MA 3 of 5Belmont Bay Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWoodbridge, VA 3 of 5Brighton Post Acute CareBrighton, MA 3 of 5Cambridge Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMoorestown, NJ 3 of 5Chelsea Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterGoochland, VA 3 of 5Exton Post AcuteExton, PA 3 of 5Hampden Post AcuteWilbraham, MA

Showing 40 of 86; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SKILLED VENTURE LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/05/2022
POPULAR BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 05/02/2022
FAIOLA, ILENAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/28/2025
FRY, BEVERLYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/28/2024
HARMAN, DINAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/05/2022
VIROJA, YOGESHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/05/2022
POSEN, MINDEEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/05/2022
MARQUIS LIMITED LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/07/2025
RELIANT PRO REHAB LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/24/2025
NEMANI, KRISHNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/04/2025
KAHANOW, AVIVAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/10/2025
LEVOVITZ, TZVIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/26/2025
ROKEACH, FRAIDEIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/10/2025
FLAGLER, OSHERIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 05/05/2022
FAIRMONT PROPERTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/05/2022
NFR 2020 IRRV TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/05/2022
NUTRACO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/05/2022
QUINTO NEXGEN LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/05/2022
RSBRMK HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/05/2022
SK NEXGEN TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/05/2022
TRYKO NEXGEN HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/05/2022
UAK 2020 IRRV TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/05/2022
UKR NEXGEN LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/05/2022
YK NEXGEN TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/05/2022
YR NEXGEN TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/05/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$22.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 43%Medicare 14%Other / private 43%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$302per resident / day
operating cost
$9,179per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$348per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395372. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next