Atlantic View Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 99 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 154 beds and averages 148.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.546 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2022-12-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interviews, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to provide the necessary treatment and services to prevent development of a sacral pressure ulcer and to promote healing of the sacral pressure ulcer for 1 of 39 residents (Resident #65) which constitued harm. The findings included: On 10/6/22 the sacral pressure ulcer presented as a red, black, and purple wound to the sacrum, measuring 8 cm by 13.0 cm, with a scant amount of drainage and a wound bed with epithelial tissue, which was determined to be an Unstageable - Suspected Deep Tissue (USDT); Injury in Evolution. On 10/10/22 the sacral USDT Injury presented with deterioration; 90% eschar, 10% slough and measured 7.5 centimeters (cm) by 7.0 cm which constituting harm. Resident #65 was originally admitted to the facility 6/14/22 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included a-fib, a pacemaker insertion, benign prostatic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-12-01 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a complaint investigation, resident and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure sufficient staff were available to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services. The findings included: The facility failed to have sufficient staff on 04/17/22 to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services. During an interview on 11/30/22 at 1:37 PM Resident #82 voiced concern about food. Resident voiced concerns about the facility not having enough staff to serve and prepare food. Resident #82 stated the facility served the residents a granola bar, a carton of juice and a cup of fruit for breakfast a few months ago because the facility did not have enough staff. During an interview on 12/01/22 at 9:58 AM Dietary Aide #1 stated on the morning of April 17, 2022 which was Easter Sunday, she was the only dietary staff on duty. Dietary Aide #1 stated she did the best she could to provide a breakfast meal to the residents. The meal consisted of granola bar, a carton of juice and a cup of fruit for those residents on a regular diet. For residents on a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-12-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure menus were followed as pre-planned. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure menus were followed as planned on 4/17/22 due to having insufficient staff. During an interview on 11/30/22 at 01:37 PM Resident #82 voiced concern about food. Resident voiced concerns about the facility not having enough staff to serve and prepare food. Resident #82 stated the facility served the residents a granola bar, a carton of juice and a cup of fruit for breakfast a few months ago because the facility did not have enough staff. A review of the facility menu dated 4/17/22 for breakfast indicated: Juice/cranberry PC, Cereal Chex [NAME] PC, Muffin Blueberry RTS, sausage link, 2 each, milk 2% 8 ounces, and 8 ounces of coffee. During an interview on 12/01/22 at 9:58 AM Dietary Aide #1 stated on the morning of April 17, 2022 which was Easter Sunday, she was the only dietary staff on duty. Dietary Aide #1 stated she did the best she could to provide a breakfast meal to the residents. The meal consisted of granola…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-12-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident and facility staff interview, the facility staff failed to prepare food that conserves nutritive value, flavor and appearance. The findings included: During an interview on 11/30/22 at 9:16 AM Resident #82 voiced concern about his food. Resident #82's concern was how his breakfast food was prepared and presented. Resident #82's breakfast tray was observed to included scrambled eggs, french toast and two sausage patties. The scrambled eggs were observed to be runny and juicy. The sausage patties were observed to be blacken in color. Resident #82 stated the sausage patties were to hard to eat. The French toast sticks were observed to be about 1/4 thick and unrecognizable. During an observation and interview with Resident #99 on 11/30/22 at 9:12 AM, Resident #99 received his breakfast tray with large portion of unseasoned scrambled eggs, one patty of sausage which was black in color and approximately three French toast sticks, one was approximately 1/8 inch thick and unrecognizable. Resident #99's family member was feeding the resident. She stated she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-12-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interview, the facility staff failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions. The findings included: During the kitchen observations on 11/29/22 at 11:27 a.m., the left wall next to the four burner stove and two door oven, was noted to have copious amounts of burnt grease and food particles. Behind the stove was burned food particles and food crumbs. Food and debris was observed behind the standing two part oven. The wall next to the eight burner stove was observed to have a hole that measured an estimated 10 inches long and 3 inches wide. Rust and corrosion was noted on the electrical sockets next to the deep fryer. The wall behind the three compartment sink was observed to have food and debris. The drain hole under the prep severing table was observed to have black like matter. The wall behind the ice machine was observed to have an estimated 8 inch by 3 inch hole. The plaster was observed to be coming off. Trash and debris was observed behind the ice machine. The kitchen floor was noted to have a brown film on it. In the dish wash room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-12-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations, and staff interview the facility staff failed to ensure garbage and refuse was disposed properly. The findings included: On 12/01/22 at 2:10 PM two of three outside garbage and refuse containers were observed with open container doors. The area around the refuse containers were observed with trash and debris. Two chairs and a sofa was observed in the area around the dumpster. A dresser drawer was observed in the area along with a pile of old wooden fencing. The area outside the kitchen door was observed to have pools of standing water, leaves, trash and debris. The administrator who accompanied the surveyor during the observations stated, the areas will be cleaned up immediately and the outside service for the dumpers will be called to replace the dumpster due to the doors not closing properly.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-12-01 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — widespread
  Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, document review, policy review and review of Centers for Medicare &Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality, Safety & Oversight (QSO) memo, the facility failed to ensure that contact tracing of residents and staff was conducted, after identifying Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)7 tested positive for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19). This deficient has the potential to affect all of the residents in the facility. Findings Include: Review of the CMS QSO-20-38-NH [Nursing Home] revised 09/23/22 revealed, an outbreak investigation is initiated when a single new case of COVID-19 occurs among residents or staff to determine if others have been exposed . Upon identification of a single new case of COVID-19 infection in any staff or residents, testing should begin immediately (but not earlier than 24 hours after the exposure, if known). Facilities have the option to perform outbreak testing through two approaches, contact tracing or broad-based (e.g., facility-wide) testing . If the facility has the ability to identify close contacts of the individual with COVID-19,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-12-01 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on deficiencies determined during this survey the QAA (Quality Assessment and Assurance) and Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to develop and implement corrective plans of action and monitoring to ensure the necessary systems were in place and correct identified quality deficiencies related to a fall on 6/10/22 for one resident (Resident #99) out of a survey sample of 39. The findings included: On 12/01/22 at approximately 4:38 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Administrator, Director of Nursing, [NAME] President (VP) of Operations, [NAME] President (VP) of Nursing and on the phone was the [NAME] President of Quality. The VP of Nursing stated the Quality Assurance Plan is used to ensure systems are evaluated, any quality care concerns are addressed and tracked for improvement. The VP of Operations stated Resident #99 fell out of the Hoyer lift during a transfer on 06/10/22. She stated she did not realize the investigation wasn't completed until information related to the fall was requested by Surveyor #1. She said almost everything…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-01 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interview the facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control program. The findings included: Resident #35 stated during an interview on 11/29/22 at 2:35 PM that she did not like taking showers in the women's shower room on the Huntington Unit because it had drain flies. Observations made on 11/29/22 at 2:45 PM indicated drain flies were noted in the women's shower room. On 11/30/22 at 9:20 AM two live roaches were observed on the Huntington Unit near room [ROOM NUMBER]. During kitchen observations on 11/29/22 at 11:30 AM, 11/30/22 at 11:48 AM and 12/1/22 at 12: 48 PM, drain flies and gnats were observed in the kitchen. During an interview on 12/1/22 at 1:30 PM the Director of Dining and Nutrition stated that pests were on the list of corrections for the kitchen area. During an interview on 12/1/22 at 4:45 PM the Administrator stated that the pest control company comes out every other week to spray and as needed if called.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-12-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, self reported documentation, family and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #41) was free from physical abuse to include having a bruise on her right lower extremity and failed to protect one resident, Resident #99 who was reviewed for neglect, in the survey sample of 39 residents. The findings included: 1. Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care facility with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease with late onset and Major Depressive Disorder. The annual, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/02/22 coded the resident as not having the ability to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The staff interview was coded for long- and short-term memory problems as well as severely impaired for daily decision making. Resident #41 requires total dependence of one person with dressing, grooming, eating, toileting, and personal hygiene, requires and bathing. The care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-12-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility self report documentation, family and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to implement their policies and procedures to report and investigate an abuse allegation involving two residents, Resident #41 and Resident #15 (the perpetrator), a closed record resident in the survey sample of 39 residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #41 the facility staff failed to report and investigate a physical abuse allegation that resulted in the resident having a bruise on her right lower extremity to the Resident Representative, Administrator/ designee, APS (Adult Protective Services) or to the State certification and certification agency. The incident occurred on 11/12/22 but was not reported until 11/14/22. Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care facility with diagnosis Alzheimer's disease with late onset and Major Depressive Disorder. The annual, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/02/22 coded the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA