No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Orchard Hill Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

111 West Road, Towson, MD 21204 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 139 certified beds · (410) 828-6500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (410) 828-6500 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2025Resident-funds citation (F0570)1 actual-harm citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$50,122 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0570)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (99) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $50,122 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-22)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
660 Kenilworth Dr · (410) 296-5544 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
32 West Rd · (410) 823-1818 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
800 Kenilworth Dr · (410) 321-0276 · Call to confirm hours
Park
910 Kenilworth Dr · (410) 887-5883 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.9%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.0%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms79.0%22.8%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.4%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.7%22.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.9%16.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.6%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.8%5.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control32.6%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.0%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine71.2%80.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.0%21.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.7%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.931.331.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.501.201.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 244 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
15.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
52.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.11U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.04hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 52.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 87 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 50% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.0%CMS range 48.0–64.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF15.1%CMS range 12.6–17.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge52.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge41.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 4.2–9.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.051.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
1.18
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.82
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.59
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
55.3%
Total nursing turnover
73.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 139 beds and averages 121.6 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-23)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-18)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

99 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 87 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and the facility investigation record, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow the physician's order or the resident's care plan to prevent a resident (Resident #25) from experiencing a fall that resulted in harm. This was evident for 1 (25) of 1 resident.The facility implemented effective and thorough corrective measures following this incident and prior to the start of this survey. The facility's plan and action were verified during this survey; therefore, this deficiency was found to be past noncompliance with a compliance date of 3/6/2026 The findings Include On 4/16/2026 10:50AM, during the initial interview, Resident #25 stated that GNA #41 had dropped me on the floor and broke my ankle. The resident then showed their pink lower leg cast. On 4/16/2026 9:05AM, during the initial medical record review, it was discovered that the resident had a physician's order for the use of a Hoyer lift with a 2 person assist with a start date of 11/29/2023 and the most recent care plan that stated the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility reported incidents, medical record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to keep residents who required either extensive assistance or total dependence with turning and repositioning in bed free from falling out of bed while providing activities of daily living (ADL) care, resulting in actual harm to Resident #33 and Resident #17. The failure of the facility staff to protect a resident from a fall resulted in a hematoma for Resident #33 and bilateral femur fractures for Resident #17. This was evident for 2 (#33, #17) of 39 residents reviewed for facility reported incidents. The findings include: 1) On 10/16/24 at 7:42 AM a review of facility reported incident MD00191729, that was received by the State Survey Agency (SA), alleged on 4/24/23, Resident #33 was receiving care and rolled from the bed. The facility called 911 and the resident was sent out to the hospital. The hospital reported that Resident #33 had a pelvic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, responsible person interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care plans were reviewed and revised at least quarterly and updated to reflect residents' current needs. This is evident for 6 (Residents #2, #3, #4, #6, #107, and #113) of 9 residents reviewed for care plan review and revision.The findings include: 1.) On 04/17/2026 at 9:11 AM, during review of the electronic medical record, it was revealed that Resident #113's last documented care plan review was on 12/18/2025. At 9:30 AM, review showed that Resident #107's last documented care plan review was on 01/02/2026. At 9:37 AM, review showed that Resident #2's last documented care plan review was on 12/11/2025. At 9:39 AM, review showed that Resident #6's last documented care plan review was on 01/09/2026. At 9:42 AM, review showed that Resident #4's last documented care plan review was on 01/02/2026. These dates exceeded the required quarterly (at least every three months) review timeframe. On 04/21/2026 at 9:54 AM, an interview was conducted with Staff #7, who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-23 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews with facility staff and review of employee files, it was determined that the facility staff failed to conduct required performance reviews of Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) at least once every 12 months. This was found to be evident for 5 (GNA #42, GNA #43, GNA #44, GNA #45, GNA #46) out of 5 GNA employee files reviewed during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include:Performance reviews are to be completed for each GNA at least every 12 months to identify specific, in-service education based on the outcome of those individual performance reviews. On 4/17/26 at 1:55 PM the surveyor requested the complete employee files including, but not limited to, health records, training records, evaluations, disciplines, et cetera for GNA #42, GNA #43, GNA #44, GNA #45, and GNA #46.On 4/22/26 at 9:31 AM in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) when asked if performance reviews were conducted for the GNAs she stated, yes. During the interview when asked how often she stated, It's supposed to be yearly. When asked where they were stored, she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed failed to ensure that medication was secured in the pharmacy issued bubble packs. This was evident in 4 out of 4 medication carts observed during the survey.The findings Include: On 4/22/26, during the medication storage observation, it was observed that in all 4 Medication carts there were a large number of pills and capsules, approximately 2-3 dozen per cart, that had come loose from the bubble packs that the pharmacy provided the resident's medication in. The loose medications were collected and given to the DON for appropriate disposal and the DON was notified of the concern and indicated the facility did not have specific policy regarding medications that came out of the bubble packs but they had ordered 2 additional medication carts since it appeared that the crowding of the bubble packs seemed to cause the medication to be accidently pushed out.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to stock appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) near resident rooms that were on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). This was found to be evident in 2 (station 1 and station 2) of 4 unit stations reviewed during the recertification survey.The findings include: PPE refers to specialized clothing or equipment worn by healthcare workers to create a barrier against infectious materials, protecting themselves and residents from contamination. It consists of gloves, gowns/aprons, masks/respirators, face shields, and goggles.EBP is an infection control strategy for long-term care facilities, requiring staff to wear gowns and gloves during high-contact care for residents with MDROs, chronic wounds, or indwelling devices.On 4/16/2026 at 8:48 AM, the following resident rooms on Station 2 were observed to have EBP posters placed on entrance doorways: Rooms 202, 203, 204, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, and 213. Station 2 had two PPE dispensers hanging from walls located in the hallway that were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident or representative were informed of the risks and benefits of a medication prior to initiation. This is evident for 1 (Resident #2) of 2 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The findings include:On 04/20/2026 at 11:05 AM, review of Resident #2's electronic medical record revealed that on 02/13/2026, Resident #2 was ordered Lorazepam Injection 1 mg intramuscularly every 24 hours as needed for breakthrough seizures for a duration of 6 months. There was no documented diagnosis of seizures for the resident and no evidence of seizure activity that would support the use of this medication.On 04/23/2026 at 10:27 AM, interview with Staff #17, the provider that wrote the order, revealed the medication was ordered as a precaution due to EEG findings during a prior hospitalization; however, the provider was unable to identify a supporting diagnosis for seizures. Staff #17 was asked if the resident was informed of the risks and benefits of the Lorazepam and s/he stated Yes'.On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications by failing to ensure a PRN psychotropic medication was ordered with an adequate indication, supporting diagnosis, and within the required 14-day time-limited duration without documented clinical justification for extended use. This is evident for 1 (Resident #2) of 2 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The findings include:Psychotropic medications are drugs that affect brain function and alter mood, behavior, or cognition; in long-term care, they must be supported by a specific clinical indication, appropriate monitoring, and time-limited use when ordered on an as-needed basis.Lorazepam is a benzodiazepine psychotropic medication commonly used for anxiety, agitation, or acute seizure activity, but it carries risks such as sedation, respiratory depression, and dependence, and requires clear clinical justification. On 04/20/2026 at 11:05 AM, during review of Resident #2's electronic medical record it was revealed the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) within 14 days of the resident's enrollment and discontinuation in hospice services. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) out of 1 residents reviewed for hospice during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include:A Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) is a comprehensive assessment that must be completed within 14 days after the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) has determined that a resident meets the guidelines for significant change for either major improvement or decline. A SCSA is required when a resident: enrolls in a hospice program, changes hospice providers and remains in the facility, discontinues hospice services, or experiences a consistent pattern of changes, with either two or more areas of decline or two or more areas of improvement, from their baseline.On 4/17/26 at 12:03 PM review of Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment records, MDS validation reports, and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to transmit MDS assessments within 14 days of completion of the assessment. This was evident for 2 (Resident #84, #106) of 2 residents reviewed for resident assessment.The findings include:On 04/22/2026 at 11:12 AM, review of MDS records revealed Resident #84 was discharged from the facility on 11/30/2025 and Resident #106 was discharged on 12/09/2025. A review of the MDS validation report showed that discharge assessments for both residents had not been transmitted within the required timeframe.On 04/22/2026 at 11:36 AM, Staff #8 stated that both MDS discharge assessments were completed but had not been transmitted, and copies were requested by the surveyor for review.On 04/23/2026 at 9:12 AM, review of the MDS 3.0 Final Validation Report confirmed that the discharge assessments for both residents were transmitted on 04/22/2026 after surveyor inquiry identified concerns, indicating transmission occurred well beyond the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded to reflect residents' clinical status. This is evident for 2 (Residents #1 and #3) of 2 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy.The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated, standardized assessment tool used to comprehensively evaluate a resident's functional, medical, psychosocial and cognitive status. It is administered to all residents at admission, quarterly, annually, and whenever a significant change in an individual's condition occurs. It is the foundation for creating an individualized care plan and ensures the appropriate care and services are provided to each resident. MDS assessments must be accurate to ensure each resident receives the personalized and resident specific care they need. A Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) is a comprehensive assessment that must be completed within 14 days after the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed and updated timely to reflect residents' current conditions. This is evident for 2 (Residents #1 and #3) of 2 residents reviewed for care planning. Findings include: A care plan is a guide that outlines a person's healthcare needs, treatment goals, and the specific interventions required to meet those goals, ensuring personalized and consistent care. The facility is required to have care plans developed and revised by an interdisciplinary team including: the attending physician, a registered nurse, a nursing aide, a representative from dietary services, the resident, and the resident's representative (as practicable). The care plan is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care they receive in a facility. A pressure ulcer also known as pressure sore, bed sore, or decubitus ulcer is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying skin. Pressure ulcers are staged according to their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 87 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of medical records and interviews with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to order and implement the treatment of a Stage 3 pressure ulcer timely. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) out of 1 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during the during the facility 's annual recertification survey.The findings include:A pressure ulcer also known as pressure sore, bed sore, or decubitus ulcer is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying skin. Pressure ulcers are staged according to their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II (partial thickness loss of skin presenting as a shallow open ulcer), Stage III (full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with exposed tendon, muscle or bone) to Unstageable (the depth of tissue damage cannot be determined due to the presence of slough or eschar (both are types of dead skin that prevent healing). Consistent care is essential for treating and preventing pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide additional nourishment for a resident as ordered by a physician. This was found to be evident in 1 (Resident #55) of 40 residents reviewed during the recertification survey.The findings include:Magic Cups most commonly refer to high-calorie, nutrient-dense frozen nutritional desserts often used in health settings.During an interview on 4/16/2026 at 10:43 AM, Resident #55 stated that their meals are often missing items they expect to receive.Resident #55's medical record was reviewed on 4/20/2026 at 12:30 PM. The resident was admitted on [DATE] and had a diet order placed by a physician on 4/2/2026 that stated, Magic Cup with meals for risk of malnutrition or equivalent 4 oz. TID and Health shakes with meals for risk of malnutrition 4 oz. TID.On 4/21/2026 at 8:56 AM, Resident #55's breakfast meal was observed. No Magic Cup or health shake were observed on the meal tray and the resident's meal ticket…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of medical records and interviews with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident's primary care provider(s) assessed and monitored his/her pressure ulcer. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) out of 1 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during the facility 's annual recertification survey.The findings include:A pressure ulcer also known as pressure sore, bed sore, or decubitus ulcer is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying skin. Pressure ulcers are staged according to their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II (partial thickness loss of skin presenting as a shallow open ulcer), Stage III (full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with exposed tendon, muscle or bone) to Unstageable (the depth of tissue damage cannot be determined due to the presence of slough or eschar (both are types of dead skin that prevent healing). Consistent care is essential for treating and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the pharmacist performed an accurate medication regimen review and identify a medication without a matching diagnosis. This is evident for 1 (Resident #2) of 2 residents reviewed for medication regimen review.The findings include:On 04/20/2026 at 11:05 AM, a review of the electronic medical record for Resident #2 revealed an order for Lorazepam Injection 1 mg intramuscularly every 24 hours as needed for breakthrough seizures for a duration of 6 months. The order was written by Staff #17 on 02/13/26. Review of Resident #2's documented medical diagnoses revealed no documented diagnosis of seizures and no evidence of seizure activity to support the use of this medication. Monthly medication regimen reviews completed on 02/27/26 and 03/29/26 documented No medication irregularities noted at this time. The pharmacist failed to identify or report that the medication lacked a documented supporting diagnosis.On 04/23/2026 at 10:27 AM, during an interview with Staff #17, the surveyor shared…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were ordered with an adequate indication and supporting diagnosis and failed to ensure appropriate parameters for a psychotropic medication ordered on an as-needed basis, resulting in an unnecessary medication. This is evident for 1 (Resident #2) of 2 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The findings include: Lorazepam is a benzodiazepine psychotropic medication commonly used for anxiety, agitation, or acute seizure activity, but it carries risks such as sedation, respiratory depression, and dependence, and requires clear clinical justification. Levetiracetam (Keppra) is an anticonvulsant used to prevent or control seizures and should be supported by a documented seizure disorder or related neurological condition.On 04/20/2026 at 11:05 AM, during review of Resident #2's electronic medical record it was revealed the resident was ordered Lorazepam Injection 1 mg intramuscularly every 24 hours as needed for breakthrough seizures for a duration of 6 months. This order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and medical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain and document accurate medical records. This was found to be evident in 1 (Resident #44) of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis during the recertification survey.The findings include:On Thursday, 4/16/2026 at 11:08 AM, Resident #44 was interviewed after returning from hemodialysis (HD) and stated that they receive HD 3 times a week on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays at 6:00 AM.Resident #44's medical records were reviewed on 4/20/2026 at 8:20 AM and showed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 44's active medical orders revealed an order placed on 1/9/2026 that stated, Dialysis on [NAME] M, W, F as per schedule, every day shift every Mon, Wed, Fri. A nephrology consult dated 4/16/2026 was reviewed that stated under assessment and plan, ESRD on hemodialysis, dialyzes T/Th/Sat via tunneled catheter with stable post-HD returns, continue T/Th/Sat HD.Resident #44's Treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews with facility staff, review of employee files, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the nurses' aides had continuing education that included dementia management training and addressed areas of weakness as determined in nurse aides' performance reviews. This was found to be evident for 2 (GNA #44 and GNA #45) of 5 GNA employee files reviewed during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include:Performance reviews are to be completed for each GNA at least every 12 months to identify specific, in-service education based on the outcome of those individual performance reviews. Relias is an online training provider that offers continuing education (CE) for healthcare, senior care, and disabilities professionals. Relias's CE library covers a wide range of topics and is accredited by many national and state licensing boards. Relias's courses are designed to help healthcare workers improve patient care, grow, and provide high-quality care.On 4/22/26 at 7:55 AM in an interview with the Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide documentation that allegations of neglect were thoroughly investigated. This was evident for 1 (#3) of 5 residents reviewed for facility reported incidents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include: On 1/20/26 at 9:47 AM a review of facility reported incident 2697242 was conducted and revealed the facility's Regional Director received a call about potential neglect for Resident #3 after the resident had been sent to the hospital. Review of the facility's investigation revealed a summary that documented the Director of Nursing (DON) had interviewed nursing staff that had provided care to Resident #3 for the 72 hours prior to transfer to the hospital. Review of the facility's investigation revealed the geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) that provided care for Resident #3 the morning of transfer to the hospital was interviewed and wrote a statement that was included in the packet. There were no further statements or interviews of staff from the previous 72 hours.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based interview and observed smell of resident's room, the facility failed to provide bedpan or change resident as requested. This was evident for 1 out of 1 resident reviewed.The findings include: On 1/20/26 at 11 am Resident #6 was heard outside of their room requesting to be changed. There were two nurses observed outside the room. Staff # 4 was the resident's assigned nurse. Staff # 4 stated to resident, you just put on your call bell, give us a chance to get there. Resident #6 continued to call out for help. There was a strong odor of urine coming from the resident's room. During the interview with resident Resident # 6 at the time of the observation, they complained about not being changed on a timely basis. Resident # 6 stated the last time I was changed was in the middle of the night and its now 11 am and I haven't been changed. Surveyor interviewed Resident #6 later in the day at 1PM and resident stated they were changed about 1 hour later or about 12 noon. The Director of Nursing was made aware of the observation and said, ok.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide respiratory services in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident for 1 (#3) of 9 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include: On 1/20/26 at 11:30 AM observation was made of Resident #3 lying in bed. Resident #3 was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. Observation was made of the oxygen concentrator that was sitting next to the bed. The setting of the amount of oxygen being delivered was 4 L (liters) per minute. There was no date written on the humidification water bottle or the oxygen tubing. The date would have indicated when the humidification water bottle was opened and when the oxygen tubing was applied.Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed a 1/18/26 physician's order for oxygen to be administered at 2L/min.On 1/20/26 at 11:41 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) accompanied the surveyor in Resident #3's room. The DON confirmed the oxygen was set at 4L/min. The DON stated she would check with the nurse and review the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0840 — isolated
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to make an appointment for Resident # 6. that was to see an outside physician. This was evident for 1 out of 1 resident reviewed.The Findings include:Medical record review on 1/20/26 for Resident #6 revealed that on 11/23/25 the Doctor for Resident #6 requested the resident get an appointment to see a gynecologist for symptoms and possible infection. The request was sent over to Staff # 5 who arranges appointments and transportation for residents that need to go out of the facility. Staff # 5 could not make an appointment for resident because all gynecologist that facility uses would not accept the resident because the large stretcher needed by resident that would not fit through the office door. Staff member # 5 stated in her interview on 1/20/26 at 11 AM, that resident's daughter makes all the appointments. Resident #6's daughter stated in an interview on 1/20/26 at 12:30PM that she was unaware that resident needed an appointment with gynecologist and she would be able to get an appointment. Per interview with DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of complaints, interviews, and documentation review it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of the residents. This was evident for 6 of 9 complaints submitted to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ), the regulatory agency, multiple staff and resident interviews, observation of staffing boards, and review of staffing schedules. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents.The findings include: 1) Six out of nine complaints that the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) received and reviewed on this survey alleged the facility did not have sufficient nursing staff to provide essential care to the residents that resided at the facility. Complaints consisted of nursing care delayed and inadequate, waiting hours to be cleaned after a bowel movement, left lying in feces and lying in bed wet, residents not receiving showers, not being turned in bed, and not receiving basic hygiene. 2) Interviews of residents and complainants revealed their concerns that the facility was short-staffed: On 10/14/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to notify the Resident's physician when the Resident's BiPap was not administered (Resident #5). This was evident for 1 of 16 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include:Review of Resident #5's medical record on 10/14/25 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with a diagnosis to include acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia. Hypercapnia is a condition characterized by an excessive amount of carbon dioxide in the blood, often resulting from respiratory issues like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or hypoventilation. Further review of Resident #5's medical record revealed the Resident was discharged to the hospital on 9/9/25 and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] states: Patient has a history of respiratory failure and CO2 (carbon dioxide) retention. Using a BiPap is critical. Review of Resident #5's physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility reported incidents, record review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin within 2 hours to the regulatory agency, the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ). This was evident for 1 (#11) of 4 residents reviewed for 4 facility reported incidents during a complaint survey.The findings include: On 10/16/25 at 7:19 AM a review of facility reported incident 2566844 was conducted and revealed Resident #11 had a displaced fracture of the right hip. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed Resident #11 had a history that included dementia, failure to thrive, and multiple contractures. On 7/15/25 on the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift, Resident #11 complained about right foot pain. Resident #11 was also observed with right foot swelling. The physician was notified and ordered for the right leg to be elevated on a pillow. On 7/16/25 the physician ordered an x-ray and doppler study. On 7/16/2025 at 11:12 PM, Resident #11's X-ray result of the right hip showed that there was a displaced fracture laterally. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 1 (#11) of 4 residents reviewed for 4 facility reported incidents during a complaint survey.The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. On 10/16/25 at 7:19 AM a review of facility reported incident 2566844 was conducted and revealed Resident #11 had a displaced fracture of the right hip. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed a 7/16/25 physician's order for an x-ray and doppler study. On 7/16/2025 at 11:12 PM, Resident #11's X-ray result of the right hip documented there was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-17 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure that a baseline care plan was provided to the resident's representative within 48 hours of admission to the facility (Resident #3). This was evident for 1 of 16 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: The baseline care plan is given to residents and their representatives within 48 hours of their admission and details a variety of components of the care that the facility intends to provide to that resident. In addition to the baseline care plan, residents are also expected to receive a list of their admission medications. This allows residents and their representatives to be more informed about the care that they receive. During interview with Resident #3's representative (RP) on 10/14/25 at 9:06 AM, the RP stated he/she was never given a baseline care plan or had a meeting with the facility staff to discuss admission to the facility within the first 48 hours of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice when administering medications (Resident #5). This was evident for 1 of 16 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include:The 6 rights of medication administration are the right patient, the right drug, the right does, the right route of administration, the right time, and the correct documentation. Review of Resident #5's medical record on 10/14/25 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with a diagnosis to include end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. The facility staff assessed the Resident on 7/13/25 to have a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 15 out of 15 indicating the Resident's cognition is intact.Review of facility documentation on 10/15/25 revealed a written statement from Staff #22 on 8/7/25 that stated: 8/5/25 1st day without a preceptor as night shift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaint review, medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide needed activities of daily living (ADL) for residents totally dependent on bathing assistance (Resident #3, #13). This was evident for 2 of 16 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1) Review of complaint 2594969 regarding Resident #3 not receiving showers for the first month and half since admission to the facility even though the Resident's representative asked the facility staff to give the Resident showers. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice (Resident #5 and #11). This was evident for 2 of 16 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #5's medical record on 10/14/25 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with a diagnosis to include end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. Further review of Resident #5's medical record revealed the Resident was discharged to the hospital on 9/9/25 and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] states: Please note this is critical for the patient to take Midodrine 1 hour prior to hemodialysis. Usually patient's dialysis is scheduled at 6:00 in the morning, therefore the first does of midodrine should be given at 5 AM. Midodrine is a medication used to treat low blood pressure (hypotension). Further review of Resident #5's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide treatment/services to prevent/heal pressures ulcers. This was evident for 1 (#12) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during a complaint survey.The findings include: A pressure ulcer, also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer, is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according the their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II ( superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister or shallow crater), Stage III ( full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone or tendon) or Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough and/or eschar in the wound bed). On 10/14/25 at 9:30 AM a review of Resident #12's medical record revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to keep medication carts locked when unattended and discard medications/biologicals when expired. This was evident on 1 of 3 nursing units observed during random observations made during a complaint survey. The findings include: On [DATE] at 8:14 AM observation was made of an unlocked and unattended medication cart sitting outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The nurse was in the room and could not be visualized from the hallway. Staff #5 came out of the room and asked the surveyor what she was doing. The surveyor informed Staff #5 that the medication cart was left unlocked and unattended and that she could not be visualized from the hallway.The surveyor opened the top drawer of the medication cart and observed an opened 20 ml. vial of sterile water. There was no date opened on the bottle of sterile water. Also observed in the top right section of the first drawer was an insulin pen for Resident #14. The insulin was opened on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards (Resident #6 and #12). This was evident for 2 of 16 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include. A medical record is the official documentation of a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. 1) Review of Resident #6's medical record on 10/14/25 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in June 2025 with diagnosis to include Multiple Sclerosis. Further review of Resident #6's medical record revealed the Resident has a Stage IV pressure ulcer of the sacrum and is currently receiving hospice services. Review of Resident #6's August, September and October 2025 Treatment Administration Records (TARs) revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to: 1) ensure food items were labeled, 2) ensure food items were discarded appropriately, 3) ensure the freezer was maintained free from ice accumulation, 4) ensure the device utilized for dispensing of juice was not stored on the kitchen floor, 5) ensure safe storage of cleaning chemicals and 6) ensure consistent required temperature levels for dishwashing sanitization. These deficient practices have the potential to affect all facility residents. On 3/10/25 beginning at 8:00 AM the surveyor conducted an initial tour of the facility's kitchen. On 3/10/25 at 8:12 AM the surveyor observed a metal container in the reach in refrigerator with the following label present: Monday Sauces/Gravies Homemade prep/opened on 3/3/25 1:25 PM, use by 3/5/25 1:25 PM. Further observation of the contents of the metal container revealed a white, lumpy, and crusty appearance of the gravy. On 3/10/25 at 8:13 AM the surveyor observed 10 unlabeled side item containers present within the reach-in refrigerator. Upon further observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the resident medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that drug records were maintained in a manner that allowed for reconciliation of dispensed and administered medication. This was evident for 4 (Resident #14, #31, #52, and #100) out of 4 residents reviewed for administration of narcotic medication during this recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Oxycodone is narcotic medication used to treat moderate to severe pain. It is at high risk for addiction and dependence. It can cause respiratory distress and death when taken in high doses or when combined with other substances, especially alcohol or other illicit drugs such as heroin and cocaine. A controlled medication utilization record (known as a count sheet) is a form to record controlled medication dispense. It documents the details for each use of any controlled substance amount removed from its original containers, including date, time, the dose given, the signature of the nurse administering medication, the amount remaining,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the kitchen steam table was maintained in safe operating condition. This was evident for one out of one steam tables observed to be in operation during the surveyor's initial tour of the facility's kitchen during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: During the surveyor's initial tour of the facility's kitchen on 3/10/25 at 8:04 AM the surveyor observed the steam table which was holding food had two out of six indicator lights (utilized to indicate to staff that the steam wells are on and ready for use) which were inoperable and four out of six knobs (to control the temperature levels of the steam wells used to maintain food temperatures) which were missing. On 3/10/25 at 8:05 AM the surveyor shared their concern and conducted an interview with [NAME] #38 who stated the following information regarding the steam table conditions: It's been like that for years. On 3/10/25 at 8:26 AM the surveyor conducted an interview and dual observation of concerns with Certified Dietary Manager…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents with information to formulate an advanced directive and ensure that a current copy of residents' advanced directives was in the residents' medical record. This was evident for 1 (Resident #56) of 3 residents reviewed for advanced directives during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: An advance directive is a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment, often including a living will, made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor. It is a legal document in which a person specifies what actions should be taken for their health if they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves because of illness or incapacity. On 3/10/25 at 11:44 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed and verified that the facility does not have paper charts for the residents. On 3/10/25 at 1:52 PM review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify a provider and/or resident representative of a significant weight loss for a resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #113) of 47 residents reviewed for the facility's recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 3/10/25 at 2:56 PM a review of Resident #113's medical record revealed the following weights: 3/5/2025 11:29 134.4 Lbs (pounds) Mechanical Lift ADON (Manual) 2/5/2025 15:40 164.0 Lbs (pounds) Mechanical Lift ADON (Manual) In the weights section of the resident's medical record, the electronic medical record had flagged and documented (written between these two weights) that there was a significant weight loss over 30 days. On 3/13/25 at 9:54 AM in an interview with the ADON when asked if the physician and/or resident representative (RP) was notified of the Resident #133's significant weight loss, she stated, no, there was no documentation observed that the physician or RP was notified of his/her weight loss. The Regional Dietician #20 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure showers maintained proper temperatures. This was evident for 1 out of 4 nursing units observed during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Resident #100 was interviewed on 03/10/25 at 11:51 AM. Resident stated that the shower room for unit 2 doesn't have hot water so few showers are taken. During the tour of the facility with the Maintenance Director (Staff #31) on 3/17/25 at 11:17 AM he used his thermometer and checked the water temperature. It was observed that the water from the hand sprayer was 88.8 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Staff #31 then turned on the shower and the temperature was the same. He left the water running and we continued with checking the shower rooms on the other units. After verifying the other shower rooms had hot water Staff #31 rechecked the water in the Unit 2 shower room and it was still in the 80's. Staff #31 went to the resident rooms on either side of the shower room and the water in each room registered as 106F.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of a facility reported incident, record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident (#120) was free from misappropriation of their personal funds. This was evident for 1 out of 2 facility reported incidents (#MD00212032) reviewed for misappropriation/personal property during the facility's recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 3/10/25 at 9:00AM the surveyor began review of a facility reported incident (#MD00212032) which was submitted by the facility to the Office of Health Care Quality on 11/14/24 which involved a family member of Resident #120 who notified the facility on 11/14/24 of unusual financial transactions which had occurred on the resident's personal bank account on 10/10/24 for $250.00 and 10/21/24 for $15.00. Review of facility reported incident #MD00212032 revealed the allegations were verified by the facility regarding the misappropriation of Resident #120's funds by Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #35. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of a facility reported incident, record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure the implementation of the abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation policy and procedures. This was evident for 1 out of 2 facility reported incidents (#MD00212032) reviewed for misappropriation/personal property during the facility's recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 3/10/25 at 9:00AM the surveyor began review of a facility reported incident (#MD00212032) which was submitted by the facility to the Office of Health Care Quality on 11/14/24 which involved a family member of Resident #120 who notified the facility on 11/14/24 of unusual financial transactions which had occurred on the resident's personal bank account on 10/10/24 for $250.00 and 10/21/24 for $15.00. Review of facility reported incident #MD00212032 revealed the allegations were verified by the facility regarding the misappropriation of Resident #120's funds by Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within 14 days of the resident's enrollment and discontinuation in hospice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #33) of 2 residents reviewed for hospice during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. The information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. A Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) is required when a resident enrolls in a hospice program and when a resident receiving hospice services discontinues those services. Completion of the SCSA ensures a more thorough review of factors related to the identified decline(s) or improvements in a resident's condition and ensures a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview with residents, review of medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to hold care plan meetings of the interdisciplinary team for residents at the time of the quarterly revision of the Minimum Data Set (MDS). This was evident for 3 (Resident #55, Resident #104, Resident #37) of 28 residents reviewed for care plan during this recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a core set of screening, clinical, and functional status data elements, including common definitions and coding categories, which form the foundation of a comprehensive assessment for all residents of nursing homes certified to participate in Medicare or Medicaid. The data elements (also referred to as items) in the MDS standardize communication about resident problems and conditions within nursing homes, between nursing homes, and between nursing homes and outside agencies. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. Care plans are developed for residents to guide the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and medical record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medical orders were followed for the provision of thickened liquids. This was evident for 1 (Resident #46) out of 1 residents reviewed for hydration during the facility's recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 3/12/25 at 12:22PM the surveyor conducted an observation of Resident #46 who was observed laying in bed asleep at meal time with a covered meal tray which included beverages on it which was sitting in front of them on the over bed table positioned over their bed. The contents of the tray appeared to be unopened and not yet consumed by the resident. On 3/14/25 at 10:50AM the surveyor observed a cup of thin water sitting on the nightstand furniture next to Resident #46 which appeared to be untouched with straw paper still present on part of the straw. On 3/14/25 at 1:20PM the surveyor observed Resident #46 in bed sleeping after meal time with a cup of thin water at their bedside on their nightstand furniture. On 3/17/25 at 9:03AM the surveyor reviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor/access residents related to potentially leading to smoking accidents. This was evident in 5 (Resident # 37, #44, #61, #93, and #100) of 5 residents reviewed for smoking during this recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: a) On 3/12/25 at 7:16 AM, a review of Resident #61's medical records revealed that on 2/25/25 a social worker (Staff # 11) wrote in a progress note, Resident was caught in the courtyard by the Activities Director smoking outside of the scheduled smoking times. Writer wrote up a smoking behavioral contract for this infarction and issued it to the Resident. On 3/12/24 at 12:03 PM, the surveyor interviewed with Staff #11. She said that on 2/25/25 the activity director found four residents (Resident #37, #44, #61, and #100) were smoking in the courtyard when it was not the facility's scheduled smoking hours. Staff #11 said, I don't know how they had their smoking material. They supposed not to have them. She also stated that she had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor and timely address a significant weight loss for a resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #113) of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Resident #113's medical record was reviewed on 3/10/25 at 2:56 PM. The review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and all of the weights obtained by the facility for the resident were as follows: - 3/5/2025: 134.4 lbs (pounds) - 2/12/2025: 165.0 lbs - 2/5/2025: 164.0 lbs - 1/24/2025: 164.0 lbs - 1/22/2025: 163.0 lbs The above weights reflected that the resident experienced a 29 lb (18%) significant weight loss between 2/5/2025 and 3/5/2025. On 3/12/25 at 11:13 AM review of Resident #113's medical record revealed a Nutritional Risk assessment dated [DATE] as follows: - Section A Weight status; loss or gain- Comments: Per resident's son, his/her UBW (usual body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to obtain/monitor pre and post-dialysis body weights. This is evident for 1 (Resident # 220) of the 1 resident reviewed for dialysis services during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Hemodialysis is a treatment that filters wastes and water from the blood, as the kidneys did when they were healthy. It helps control blood pressure and balance essential minerals, such as potassium, sodium, and calcium, in patients' bodies. During an interview with Resident #220 on 3/10/25 at 8:12 AM, the resident reported that he/she transferred to the hospital on 1/19/25 due to shortness of breath. Also,the resident claimed that he/she still had some discomfort with breathing and edema. On 3/12/25 at 7:30 AM, a review of Resident #220's discharge summary from the hospital dated 1/25/25 showed that the resident was admitted to the hospital due to respiratory failure with hypoxia (Hypoxia is a condition in which there is an inadequate supply of oxygen to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation it was determined that the facility staff failed to post staffing information in an easily accessible location. This was evident for 4 out of the 7 days of the recertification/complaint survey. The findings are: The survey team observed upon entrance and subsequent tours of the facility that the facility staff had not posted the nurse staffing information for the facility in an easily accessible location. The team then observed on March 14, 2025, that a sign with the nurse staffing information was placed on a table in the reception area adjacent to St Patrick's Day decorations. The survey team informed the facility of the citation at the exit conference.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure medications are kept in a secure location. This was evident for 1 out of the 4 nursing units observed during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: During the tour of the facility on 3/10/25 at 8:09 AM an unlocked medication cart was observed on Unit Two between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. There were no residents in the hallway at this time. Three facility staff members walked past the medication cart during the observation period and not one locked the cart. At 8:22 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) walked up to the medication cart, opened the controlled substance logbook, and pushed in the lock. This surveyor walked up to the DON, informed her that I had been standing in the hallway, and that the medication cart had been unlocked for almost 15 minutes. She confirmed it was unlocked when she went up to the cart.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of medical records, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received necessary and/or recommended dental services in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 (Resident #61) of 2 residents reviewed for dental services during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: During an interview with Resident #61 on 3/10/25 at 12:29 PM, the resident reported that he/she had broken teeth that still retained roots. The resident said, I need oral surgery to remove this remaining piece. But the staff canceled my appointment. On 3/13/25 at 11:33 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #61's medical records. The review revealed that the dental consultation was placed on 4/24/24; the consultation form included a copy of an X-ray that showed a broken tooth. Further review of medical records revealed that Resident #61 was seen by [name of contracted dental group] on 6/11/24. On that day, the dentist documented that Patient has retained roots 11 & 12 that are partially embedded in gingiva and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0840 — isolated
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) ensure contracted services for wound care were timely documented in the medical record and 2) failed to ensure the resident's medical record was no longer accessible by a provider once that provider was no longer involved in the care of the resident. This was evident for 3 (Resident #121, #119, #270) of 47 residents reviewed during the facility's recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) A review of Resident #121's clinical record on 3/12/25 at 2:41 PM revealed that on 3/6/25 the Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner (CRNP #34) wrote a note for a wound care visit that was done on 11/20/24. The resident was seen on wound care rounds for the evaluation of wounds on the right foot. The Director of Nursing (DON) was shown the note on 3/12/25 and informed it was written for a wound care consult that occurred almost four months earlier. She replied that she did not recognize who CRNP #34 was. She then added that she would look into it. 2) On 3/14/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor and track antibiotic usage. This was evident by 1) the delayed start of the antibiotic and 2) a resident receiving an extra dose. This was found to be true for 1 (Resident #94) out of 3 residents reviewed for antibiotic use during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) As part of the investigation into Urinary tract infection, the surveyor reviewed Resident #94's medical record on 3/17/25 at 7:30 AM. The review revealed that the resident's urine test on 2/24/25 resulted in a positive for infection, and the provider prescribed oral Augmentin 875/125mg (antibiotic) twice a day for five days on 2/26/25. Further review of Resident #94's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for February 2025 revealed that the afternoon dose scheduled at 9 PM for Augmentin 875/125mg was signed by a nurse, then the order was discontinued at 11:16 PM on 2/26/25. The new order (the same indication, dose, duration, and frequency) was placed with a starting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to administer medications and treatments as ordered by the physician (Resident #5, #22, #47, #56). This was evident for 4 of 61 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to administer pain medication timely for Resident #5. Review of Resident #5's medical record on 10/10/24 for a complaint regarding timely administration of pain medication in March 2022 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include malignant neoplasm of endometrium. A malignant neoplasm of the endometrium, also known as endometrial cancer, is a type of cancer that occurs when cells in the lining of the uterus grow out of control. Further review of Resident #5's medical record revealed the Resident was ordered to receive A) Morphine Sulfate 30 mg every 12 hours for pain and B) Gabapentin 300 mg three times a day for peripheral neuropathy. Gabapentin is a medication used to treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to notify the resident's physician and/or resident's representative when the resident had a change in condition (Resident #9 and #47). This was evident for 2 of 38 complaint residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1. Review of Resident #47's medical record on 10/16/24 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital with diagnosis to include chronic respiratory failure and status post lung transplant. Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was on BiPAP for his/her chronic respiratory failure. BiPAP, or bilevel positive airway pressure, is a noninvasive ventilator that helps people breathe when they have medical problems that make it difficult. Review of Resident #47's October 2024 TAR revealed the facility staff did not document the Resident was administered the BiPAP on 10/4 and 10/6/23. Further review of Resident #47's medical record revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of a facility reported incident, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to protect a resident from inappropriate sexual contact from a geriatric nursing assistance (GNA) (Resident #21). This was evident for 1 of 39 facility reported incidents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 10/10/24 at 1:21 PM a review of facility reported incident MD00187475 revealed on 1/7/23 at 6:00 AM the facility's previous Director of Nursing (DON), Staff #52 received a telephone call that a GNA was found by staff engaged in a sexual act with Resident #21, an alert and oriented resident. Police were notified and the GNA was sent home. Review of the facility's investigation revealed GNA #58 was from a staffing agency. The facility documented that Resident #21 discussed the situation with them and stated GNA #58 came in to provide care and made the sexual advances. Resident #21 stated he/she was not upset it happened. Resident #21 stated it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on reviews of facility reported incidents with documentation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to report allegations of abuse within 2 hours of the allegation to the regulatory agency, the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ). This was evident for 3 (#17, #3, #10) of 39 facility reported incidents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 10/15/24 at 9:43 AM a review of facility reported incident MD00183680 was conducted and revealed Resident #17 told the MDS nurse on 9/20/22 at 11:15 AM that he/she was hit in the leg that morning by a GNA while getting ready for dialysis. The MDS nurse report it to the NHA, and an initial facility report was sent to OHCQ at 12:36 PM. Review of the facility's investigation revealed an email from GNA #54 that documented Resident #17 wanted to speak to a supervisor because he/she wanted someone else to take care of him/her. When GNA #54 told Resident #17 who the supervisor was the resident started screaming, shouting, and crying. GNA #54 documented in the email that because of the loud noise and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on documentation review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment for residents (Resident #3, #6, #10 and #43). This was evident for 4 of 39 residents reviewed for facility reported incidents during an annual survey. The findings include: Upon entry to the facility on [DATE] a list of facility reported incidents was provided to administration. At that time the request was for all investigations to be provided to the surveyors. 1. On 10/10/24 review of facility reported incident MD00182429 revealed Resident #6's emergency contact emailed the facility on 3/9/22 with allegations of neglect of the Resident. On 10/15/24 at 11:10 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she could not find the investigation for facility reported incident MD00182429. Interview with the DON on 10/16/24 at 8:24 AM confirmed the facility does not have the email with the list of grievances, interview with the Resident, emergency contact or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 2 (#59, #24) of 61 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1) On 10/10/24 at 11:54 AM Resident #59's medical record was reviewed and revealed Resident #59 sustained a fracture of the proximal phalanx of the fifth toe according to an x-ray report dated 7/30/24. Review of the Discharge Return Anticipated MDS with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 7/31/24 failed to capture the fracture in Section I, diagnosis. On 10/10/24 at 1:10 PM an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of a facility reported incident, record review, and staff interview it was determined that facility staff failed to update care plans when there were changes in resident needs and failed to have evidence of care plan meetings. This was evident for 2 (#10, #4) of 61 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) On 10/16/24 at 8:02 AM a review of facility reported incident MD00196462 alleged that on 9/1/23 Resident #10 was slapped by staff while being provided with ADL (activities of daily living) care. Review of the facility's investigation revealed staff interviews that Resident #10 was agitated with the staff who were attempting to change the resident, and the resident kicked and punched at the GNA (geriatric nursing assistant). On 10/16/24 at 9:20 AM an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #13 about Resident #10's behaviors. LPN #13 was asked what she did when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to provide treatment/services to prevent/heal pressures ulcers (Resident #22). This is evident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during a complaint survey. The findings included: A pressure ulcer also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according the their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II ( superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister or shallow crater), Stage III ( full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone or tendon) or Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough and / or eschar in the wound bed). Review of Resident #22's medical record on 10/15/24 revealed the Resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care treatment for residents (Resident #47 and #4). This was evident for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care services. The findings include: 1.Review of Resident #47's medical record on 10/16/24 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital with diagnosis to include chronic respiratory failure and status post lung transplant. Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was on BiPAP for his/her chronic respiratory failure. BiPAP, or bilevel positive airway pressure, is a noninvasive ventilator that helps people breathe when they have medical problems that make it difficult. Review of the Resident's physician orders and September 2024 TAR (Treatment Administration Record) revealed the Resident's Bipap was not ordered and documented as administered until 9/29/23, 4 days after admission. Review of Resident #47's October 2024 TAR revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen was free from an unnecessary drug (Resident #47). This was evident for 1 of XX residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #47's medical record on 10/16/24 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital. Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was to receive Metoprolol 25 mg two times daily, Please do not take on the morning of dialysis days. Review of the Resident's medical record revealed the Resident went to dialysis on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. Metoprolol is a medication that is used to lower blood pressure and heart rate. Further review of the Resident's medical record revealed the Resident received Metoprolol on the following days that the Resident also received dialysis: 9/28, 9/30, 10/3, and 10/5/23. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 10/16/24 at 12:30 PM confirmed the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0840 — isolated
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview, the facility staff failed to obtain outside services for residents in a timely manner (Resident #27). This was evident for 1 of 61 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1. During interview with Resident #27 on 10/17/24 at 12:30 PM, the Resident stated the facility never got me the splints for my foot drop. Observation of the Resident at that time revealed the Resident had heel protector boots but no foot drop splints in place. Review of Resident #27's medical record on 10/17/24 revealed the Resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include muscle wasting and atrophy of right lower leg and tibia fracture of left leg. Further review of Resident #27's medical record revealed the Resident went to a vascular specialist on 6/18/24 and at the time the vascular specialist recommended foot drop splints. The Resident went to the Specialist on 7/12/24 for complaints pain feet and ankles and pain in both legs.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on administrative and medical record reviews and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards (Resident #9 and #22). This was evident for 2 of 61 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include. A medical record is the official documentation of a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. 1. Review of Resident #22's medical record on 10/15/24 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital with an unstageable right heel pressure ulcer, a left below the knee amputation surgical wound, and right leg and foot arterial wounds. Further review of Resident #22's medical record revealed the Resident was seen by the Wound Nurse Practitioner on 1/4 and 1/17/23 but the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain the resident call bell system in working order. This was evident for 1 of 14 resident rooms on the Unit 3 nursing unit which affected 2 (#10, #35) of 37 residents that resided on Unit 3 during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 10/16/24 at 8:54 AM observation was made in Resident #10 and Resident #35's room of small handheld bells sitting on the over the bed tray tables. On 10/16/24 at 8:58 AM Resident #35 was interviewed and was asked about the handheld bell. Resident #35 stated, you can ring it, but they don't come. Resident #35 was asked how long the call bell had not been working. Resident #35 stated, over a week, at least 10 days. Maintenance was waiting for a part; he said that on Monday. On 10/16/24 at 8:58 AM the surveyor rang the handheld bell. The surveyor rang the bell again at 9:08 AM. There was no nursing staff that came to the resident's room. At 9:15 AM the surveyor rang…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-06-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations of the facility's kitchen food services, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain food service equipment in a manner that ensures sanitary food service operations. This was identified while observing the facility's dish washing machine in operation. The findings include. Observation of the facility's dish washing machine on 6/22/21 at 2:30 PM revealed that the lunch time dish washing was nearly completed. Observation of the wash temperature gauge revealed that the wash temperature did not go above 141 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The Certified Dietary Manager (staff #11) joined the surveyor and confirmed that the wash cycle water temperature was not at the correct temperature for proper dishware sanitation. As the dietary staff continued to run racks of dishes or empty dish racks into the dish washing machine, the temperature gauge for the wash cycle went down to 138 degrees Fahrenheit. Review of the dishwasher temperature log at 2:35 PM revealed that there was not any recording of the dishwashing water temperatures for the lunch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-30 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to promote self determination for Residents (#67, #69, # 112 and #113). This was evident for 4 of 10 residents reviewed for choices and 4 of 58 residents reviewed during the survey process. The findings include: 1. Facility staff failed to provide showers as scheduled and per Resident #67's request. During interview with Resident #67 on 6/16/21 at 10:00 AM, the resident stated he/she was not receiving showers as he/she would like. Review of Resident #67's medical record on 6/21/21 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of the resident's medical record revealed the facility conducted an assessment of the resident on 5/10/21 and coded the resident as total dependence on staff with one person physical assist for bathing. Review of Resident #67's electronic medical record revealed the resident was scheduled for showers on Tuesday and Fridays. Review of showers documented as given in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-30 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility documentation and interview, the facility staff failed to provide evidence that the facility had purchased a surety bond to assure the security of all the residents' personal funds deposited with the facility. This was evident during the investigation of facility tasks during an annual survey. The findings include: On 6/29/21 at 12:00 PM the Business Office Manager provided the surveyor a list of all residents' personal funds held with the facility including a total of $87, 928.11. At that time the surveyor requested evidence of a surety bond purchased by the facility. Surety bond is an agreement between the principal (the facility), the surety (the insurance company), and the obligee (depending on State law, either the resident or the State acting on behalf of the resident), wherein the facility and the insurance company agree to compensate the resident (or the State on behalf of the resident) for any loss of residents' funds that the facility holds, safeguards, manages, and accounts for. The Business Office Manager provided the surveyor an email dated 10/14/20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-30 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed staff to provide residents and/or their representative (RP) with the proper paper documentation of the facilities bed hold policy (Resident #29, #40, #57, #82 and #89). This was evident for 5 out of 5 residents reviewed for discharge during the annual survey. The findings include: A bed hold policy is written information to the resident or resident representative that specifies the duration that the resident is permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility. It is given before a nursing facility transfers a resident to a hospital or the resident goes out on therapeutic leave. 1. On 6/24/21 a medical record review for Resident #29 was done and it revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital on 9/12/20 and again on 6/11/21. Further review of the resident medical record on the same date did not find written documentation of the facility's bed hold policy was provided to the resident and/or the RP. 2. An interview was conducted with the Unit Manager (staff #4) on 6/21/21 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure the care plan meeting occurred to review and revise the care plan after the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (Residents #1, #13) and the facility staff failed to review and revise care plans for Residents ( #89 and #53) to reflect accurate and appropriate interventions. This was evident for 4 of 6 residents selected for review of care planning and 5 of 58 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of a federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare or Medicaid certified nursing homes. This process entails a comprehensive, standardized assessment of each resident's functional capabilities and health needs. Assessments are conducted by trained nursing home clinicians on all patients at admission and discharge, in addition to other time intervals (e.g., quarterly, annually, and when residents experience…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident medical records and interviews with residents and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care to promote the highest practable well being as evidenced: by failures to follow physician orders, to follow up on dieticians' recommendations and abnormal labs, and to adequately assess residents for fall risks. This was evident for 6 of 58 residents (Residents #38, #80, #210, #260, #470, and #472) that were reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to schedule a neurology consultation for Resident #38 as ordered by the physician. Medical record review for Resident #38 on 6/29/21 at 8:45 AM revealed on 1/23/21 the physician ordered: please schedule the patient with neurologist for migraines. Neurology is the branch of medicine concerned with the study and treatment of disorders of the nervous system. Migraine is a neurological condition that can cause multiple symptoms. It is frequently…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to obtain weights as ordered by the physician in a timely manner for Residents (#53, #57); failed to provide Resident #69 with supplement as ordered; failed to hold milk for Resident #210 as recommended by dietician ;failed to ensure Resident #213 received foods of preference and failed to provide Resident #261 with a therapeutic diet. This was evident for 6 of 8 residents reviewed for Nutrition and 6 of 58 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed obtain a weight for Resident #53 in a timely manner. Medical record review for Resident #53 on 6/25/21 at 9:00 AM revealed the facility staff documented the resident's weight on: 2/2/21 as 174.4 lbs. 3/5/21 as 167.2 lbs. 5/6/21 as 195.5 lbs.- an increase of 28.3 lbs in 2 months and 5/27/21 as 204 lbs- another increase of 8.5 lbs. Further record review revealed staff #30 assessed the resident on 5/13/21 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to address Consultant Pharmacy Drug Regimen Review in a timely manner for Residents (#29, #38, #53, #80, #82 and #98). This was evident for 6 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication and 6 of 58 residents selected for review during the survey sample. The findings include: 1. The facility failed to ensure that monthly medication regimen reviews were conducted by the pharmacy to identify any irregularities in the resident medication regimen. for Resident #29. A medical record review was conducted on 6/24/21 at 8:50 AM for Resident #29. Upon review it revealed the resident has a list of current medications prescribed by the physician. One of the medications reviewed for Resident #29 for unnecessary medications is Buspirone HCL. The resident is prescribed Buspirone HCL 10 mg one time a day and Buspirone HCL 5 mg at bedtime for Anxiety. A pharmacy regimen review is conducted monthly by the pharmacy to identify if there are any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain medical records in the most accurate form for residents (Resident #38, #82, #84,# 89, #212, #213, #312, #460 and #463). This was evident for 9 of 58 residents reviewed in the annual survey. The findings include: A medical record is the official documentation for a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. 1. The facility staff failed to obtain the complete consultation report as requested by the physician for Resident #38. Medical record review on 6/28/21 at 9:30 AM for Resident #38 revealed on 6/7/21 the physician reviewed a Neurology consultation for the resident. Review of the consultation revealed the consultation Final Report was 4 pages; however, the medical record only had 3 pages of that consultation. It was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of employee health records and interview; the facility staff failed to: 1.) thoroughly screen for immunity to diseases and failed to offer the Hepatitis B vaccine to those newly hired employees (Employee #38, #39, #40, #41, #42). This is evident for 5 of 5 newly hired employees and 1 out of 58 residents reviewed during an annual survey; and 2.) failed to follow standard infection control practices regarding the food tray for Resident #35. This was evident for 1 of 1 breakfast tray observed. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to thoroughly screen for immunity for diseases Measles is an infection of the respiratory system caused by a virus. Measles is spread through respiration contact with fluids from an infected person's nose and mouth, either directly or through aerosol transmission, and is highly contagious. Mumps is a contagious disease that leads to painful swelling of the salivary glands. The mumps are caused by a virus. The virus is spread from person-to-person…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide an environment to promote the highest dignity to Resident #213. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dignity and 1 of 58 residents reviewed during the survey sample. The findings include: 1 A. The facility staff failed to provide Resident #213 breakfast tray with the utmost dignity. This surveyor arrived at Unit 4 on 6/22/21 at 8:05 AM. Upon observation, Resident #35's (roommate to Resident #213) breakfast tray was noted in the room. Upon further observation, it was noted that the food carts were at each end of the hall; however, it was also noted no staff actively serving trays. The surveyor interviewed Resident #213 if breakfast was served, and the resident confirmed that no breakfast had been served to her/him and no was tray noted in the room for Resident #213. It was also noted that the Geriatric Nursing Assistants removing dirty trays (trays that had been in residents' room and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to notify Resident #69's Responsible Party (RP) when a medication was discontinued. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for notification of change and 1 of 58 resident reviewed during the annual survey process. The findings include: Interview with the Resident #69's responsible party on 6/21/21 at 8:50 AM revealed that she is not always notified of changes in the resident's condition. Medical record review for Resident #69 on 6/22/21 at 12:00 PM revealed on 8/7/20 the physician order: discontinue Plavix 75 milligrams. Plavix is a brand-name prescription drug. Plavix is an antiplatelet medication. It prevents the platelets from clumping together into blood clots. Further record review and interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 6/ 22/21 at 1:30 PM revealed the facility staff failed to notify the RP for Resident #69 of the discontinuation of the Plavix. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator, DON and Corporate Nurse on 6/30/21 at 2:00 PM were notified of the concerns…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-30 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of administrative records, it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notification to residents when the facility determined that a resident no longer qualified for Medicare part A skilled services. This is identified for 2 (Residents #89, and #106) of 2 residents reviewed that remained in the facility after termination of skilled services. The findings include. At the initation of the survey on 6/16/21, the facility was requested to provide a list of Medicare beneficiaries who were discharged from a Medicare covered Part A stay with benefit days remaining in the past 6 months prior to the survey. The facility provided a computerized list of all residents discharged from the facility. The facility was asked to provide another list. The 2nd list only included 20 residents and none of the residents on the list had remained in the facility upon termination of Medicare skilled service. An interview was conducted with the Short term Social…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation on 6/25/21 at 11:49 AM, the facility staff failed to replace ripped and torn screens in rooms 209, 211, 213, and 215. This was evident for 4 out of 15 rooms observed for ripped screens. The findings include: On 6/25/21 at 12:03 PM this writer spoke with the Maintenance Director, Staff #29, the Administrator was present and stated to him the screens in the windows of rooms 209, 211, 213, and 215 were ripped and need replacing. Further observation revealed that there are other windows in the facility where the screens have been repaired with screening material, but could use replacement, as well. The Maintenance Director returned a short time later with the Administrator on 6/25/21 at 12:49 PM and stated that he would do an audit of all the rooms and replace any damaged screens.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) of an injury of unknown origin to Resident #69. This was evident for 1 of 58 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: The purpose of the reportable events is to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of residents in nursing homes. A reportable event is an allegation or actual occurrence of an incident that adversely affects or has the potential to negatively affect the welfare of an individual. The purpose of a thorough investigation is first to determine if abuse of the resident has occurred. It is the expectation that any injury of unknown occurrence be investigated by the facility and be reported to the appropriate agency within 24 hours and the conclusion of the investigation to be reported in 5 days to the appropriate agency (OHCQ). Medical record review for Resident #69 on 6/22/21 at 11:30 AM revealed that on 9/29/20 the resident was noted to have a lump-like swelling with purplish discoloration on the right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-30 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to document that information was provided to the acute care facility when a resident was transferred there emergently. This was evident for 1 (Resident #40) of 6 residents reviewed for hospitalization and 1 of 58 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: Resident #40's medical record was reviewed on 6/21/21at 8:30 AM. Review of the Census tab in the electronic health record (EHR) revealed that billing was stopped on 6/17/21. Review of the progress notes and the evaluations tab did not reveal any information as to why billing was stopped. There was not any type of progress note nor an evaluation to indicate that the resident was sent out of the facility. An interview with the Unit Manager (staff #4) on 6/21/21 at 2:18 PM confirmed that the resident was sent to the hospital on 6/17/21. She was informed that there was not any documentation in the medical record to indicate that Resident #40 was transferred out on 6/17/21. She reviewed the chart and confirmed that there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-30 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident, and/or their responsible party (RP), received written notification of a transfer to the hospital, including appeal rights and ombudsman contact information (Residents #29 #40, #57, #82 and #89). This was found to be evident for 5 out of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization during an annual survey. The findings include: 1. Resident #29's medical record was reviewed on 6/24/21 at 8:41 AM and it revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital on 6/11/21 for urinary retention with abdominal pain and on 9/12/20 for dark emesis (vomiting) and shortness of breath. Further record review on the same date failed to reveal the resident and/or RP was notified in writing of the reason for the transfer. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing on 6/24/21 at 2:30 PM and she was asked to provide documentation that the residents and/or RP were notified in writing of the transfer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-30 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to orient, prepare, and document a resident's preparation for a transfer to the hospital. This was exemplified for 2 (#40, #89) of 6 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the annual survey and 2 of 58 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include. 1. Resident #40's medical record was reviewed on 6/21/21at 8:30 AM. Review of the Census tab in the electronic health record (EHR) revealed that billing was stopped on 6/17/21. Review of the progress notes and the evaluations tab did not reveal any information as to why billing was stopped. There was not any type of progress note or and evaluation to indicate that the resident was sent out of the facility. An interview with the Unit Manager (staff #4) on 6/21/21 at 2:18 PM confirmed that the resident was sent to the hospital on 6/17/21. Staff #4 was asked questions to how are resident informed of the facilities bed hold policy and how are residents informed in writing of a facility initiated discharge. Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to accurately code the resident's status on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (Resident #1, #54 and #111). This was evident for 3 out of 58 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of the federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes. This process provides a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems. Care Area Assessments (CAAs) are part of this process, and provide the foundation upon which a resident's individual care plan is formulated. MDS assessments are completed for all residents in certified nursing homes, regardless of source of payment for the individual resident. MDS assessments are required for residents on admission to the nursing facility, periodically, and on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it was determined that facility staff failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for residents (Resident #1 and #260). This was evident for 2 of 6 residents reveiwed for care plans and 2 of 58 residents selected for review during an annual survey. The findings include: A care plan is an outline of nursing care showing all the resident's needs and the ways of meeting the needs. Care plans provide direction for individualized care of the resident. A care plan flows from each resident's unique list of diagnoses and should be organized by the individual's specific needs. It is a dynamic document initiated at admission and subject to continuous reassessment and change by the nursing staff caring for the resident. The care plan typically includes nursing and medical diagnoses, nursing interventions, and outcomes to ensure consistency of care. 1. The facility staff failed to develop and implement a care plan to manage a resident's dental care. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and observation, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide nursing care within the standards of practice for Residents #84 and #210. This was evident for 2 of 58 residents reviewed during the survey process. The findings include: 1 A. The facility staff failed to lubricate a suppository prior to insertion for Resident #84. Medical record review for Resident #84 on 6/25/21 at 8:00 AM revealed on 4/26/21 at 5:00 PM the physician ordered: Anusol-HC Suppository 25 milligrams, insert 1 suppository rectally two times a day for Hemorrhoid. Anusol Suppositories help to relieve the swelling, itch and irritation of internal piles (hemorrhoids) and anal itching. Observation of medication administration on 6/23/21 at 8:42 AM revealed facility staff nurse #34 administered Anusol suppository; however, failed to apply lubricant prior to administration. Dip the tip of the suppository in water, or apply a small amount of water-based lubricant, such as K-Y Jelly prior to insertion of the suppository. A lubricant helps the suppository more easily slide into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-30 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of a closed medical record and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a resident with a completed discharge summary (Resident #112). This was evident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for closed records during an annual survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #112's closed medical record on 6/21/21 revealed that Resident #112 was discharged from the facility on 4/5/21. Resident #112's electronic medical record and paper record failed to reveal a completed discharge summary from Resident #112's attending physician that included: a recapitulation of the resident's stay, a final summary of the resident's status, reconciliation of all pre-discharge medications with the post discharge medications, and a post discharge plan of care. An interview with the Director of Nursing on 6/25/21 at 9:23 AM confirmed that Resident #112's record did not include a completed discharge summary.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to provide thorough grooming and personal hygiene services for (Residents #1, #69, #80, #212). This is evident for 4 of 9 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care and 4 of 58 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: The Long Term Care Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a standardized, primary screening and assessment tool of health status which forms the foundation of the comprehensive assessment for all residents of long-term care facilities certified to participate in Medicare or Medicaid. The MDS contains items that measure physical, psychological and psycho-social functioning. The items in the MDS give a multidimensional view of the patient's functional capacities, and can be used to present a nursing home's profile. One of the section of the MDS is: Functional Abilities and Goals. Some of the components assessed in the Functional Abilities and Goals of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to provide treatment/services to prevent/heal pressures ulcers (Resident #67, #77 and #260). This is evident for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and 3 of 58 residents reviewed during an annual survey. The findings included: A pressure ulcer also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according the their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II ( superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister or shallow crater), Stage III ( full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone or tendon) or Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough and / or eschar in the wound bed). A deep tissue injury (DTI) is a unique…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and interview with a resident, it was determined that the facility failed to provide safety equipment for a resident that smokes. This was identified for Resident #70 during 1 of 3 smoking observations and 1 of 58 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: During the initiation of the survey as requested the facility provided a list of residents that smoke, the designated smoking times, and a list of resident that require a smoking apron for safety. Resident #70 was identified to wear a smoking apron when smoking. On 6/17/21 Resident #70 was observed during the 9 AM resident smoking time to not be wearing a smoking apron safety device. The resident was interviewed as she/he was smoking. The resident indicated she/he had graduated from using a smoking apron as she/he was no longer in a wheelchair. Review of Resident #70's medical record on 6/17/21 at 11:50 AM revealed a care plan related to the resident smoking safely. One of the two written goals was; I will utilize my safety equipment appropriately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to thoroughly assess and intervene when Resident #53 was noted with a decrease in urinary continence. This was evident for 1 of 3 resident selected for review of urinary continence and 1 of 58 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of the U.S. federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents. This process provides a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems. Categories of MDS (Minimum Data Set) are: Cognitive patterns, Communication and hearing patterns, Vision patterns, Physical functioning and structural problems which includes the assessment of range of motion, Continence, Psychosocial well-being, Mood and behavior patterns, Activity pursuit patterns, Disease diagnosis, Other health conditions, Oral/nutritional status, Oral/dental status, Skin condition, Medication use and Treatments and procedures. At the end of the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to administer pain medication to newly admitted residents in a timely manner (Resident #261 and #470). This was evident for 2 out of 2 residents reviewed for pain management and 2 of 58 residents reviewed during an annual survey. The findings include: 1. During interview with Resident #261 on 6/16/21 at 11:53 AM, the resident stated when he/she was admitted to the facility from the hospital around 8:00 PM, he/she didn't receive pain medication until the next day around 3:00 PM even though he/she had requested pain medication. Review of Resident #261's medical record on 6/21/21 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at approximately 8:15 PM from the hospital with a diagnosis to include chronic pain syndrome. Review of the resident's Medication Administration Record for June 2021 revealed the facility staff first documented they administered Oxycodone 10 mg to the resident was 6/12/21 at 7:14 PM, almost 24 hours after the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and medical record review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain enough nursing staff to meet resident care needs in a timely manner for residents. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include: During investigation of multiple complaints from residents and residents' families regarding staffing at the facility, the surveyor interviewed the Resident Council President (#40) and the resident's roommate (#106) on 6/23/21 at 12:15 PM. At that time Resident #40 and #106 both stated it takes too long for the facility staff to answer call bells. Resident #40 stated he/she had recently been readmitted from the hospital and uses a BiPAP machine. A BiPAP machine is a non-invasive form of therapy for patients suffering from sleep apnea. Resident #40 stated he/she put on his/her call bell last night at 10:40 PM because his/her BiPAP didn't seem to be working correctly and it took until 12:30 AM (1 hour and 40 minutes) for the staff to answer. During interview with Resident #106 at that time, he/she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #80 was free from unnecessary medications. This was evident for 1 of 5 residents selected for review of unnecessary medications and 1 of 58 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: 1 A. The facility staff failed to hold a blood pressure medication as ordered by the physician for Resident #80. Medical record review for Resident #80 on 6/29/21 at 12:30 PM revealed on 6/1/21 the physician ordered: Cozaar 50 milligrams by mouth at bedtime for high blood pressure. Administer the medication if the blood pressure is greater than 140/90. Cozaar is a medicine used to treat the symptoms of high blood pressure. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the facility staff documented the resident's blood pressure as 123/67 on 6/4/21 at 9:00 PM and 122/76 on 6/5/21 at 9:00 PM; however, failed to hold the medication as ordered. 1 B. The facility staff failed to administer pain medication in accordance with the parameters set by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and observation of medication administration, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain an error rate below 5%. Observation of medication administration resulted in an error rate of 12.9%. This was evident for 2 of 3 (#210 and #84) residents observed and 4 of 31 opportunities for error. The findings include: Error #1: The facility staff failed to administer a medication until surveyor intervention. Medical record review for Resident #210 on 6/22/21 at 10:00 AM revealed on 5/18/2021 the physician ordered: Cholecalciferol Tablet, give 5000 IU (international units) by mouth one time a day for supplement. Cholecalciferol is vitamin D3. Vitamin D helps the body absorb calcium. Cholecalciferol is used as a dietary supplement in people who do not get enough Vitamin D in their diets to maintain adequate health. Observation of medication administration on 6/21/21 at 9:14 AM revealed facility staff #35 failed to administer the medication until surveyor intervention. Staff #35 had completed administering medications to Resident #210 and had proceeded to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-30 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, staff interview and medical record review it was determined that facility staff failed to assist a resident in obtaining routine and emergency dental care (Resident #1 and #69). This was evident for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for dental and 2 of 58 residents reviewed during an annual survey. The findings include: 1. Observation of Resident #1 on 6/28/21 at 11:46 AM revealed the resident to have upper dentures with the top middle tooth broken and the 2 teeth to the right of the middle tooth broken. Further observation of the resident revealed the resident did not have lower dentures. Review of Resident #1's medical record on 6/28/21 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of the medical record revealed as of 6/28/21 the resident has not received any dental services for broken and missing dentures. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 6/29/21 at 11:05 AM confirmed the facility staff failed to obtain a dental consult for the resident. Following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2025-10-17 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain accurate nursing staffing data. This was evident during a complaint survey and was evident for 18 of 18 days reviewed.The findings include: On 10/14/25 at 9:30 AM the surveyor requested the actual worked nursing schedule for the time period 7/25/25 to 8/12/25. On 10/15/25 at 7:00 AM, while reviewing a complaint, the surveyor was looking at the actual worked nursing schedules that were given from the Director of Nursing (DON). It was found that the schedules did not match up with statements from an investigation of who worked on a particular day. At that time the surveyor requested time punches to correlate with the nursing schedules. On 10/16/25 at 11:30 AM an interview was conducted with Staff #15, the Human Resources Director. Staff #15 stated that she was going through time punches, and she confirmed that the schedule that was given to the surveyor as the actual worked schedule was not correct. Staff #15 stated, we have had 2 schedulers during this time period. They…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2021-06-30 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of daily staffing records, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to post the total number and actual hours worked by categories of registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and certified nursing aides per shift and failed to have the staff data requirements available in an accurate, clear and readable format. It was identified that the facility did not have staffing information readily available in a readable format for residents and visitors for the first 5 days of the survey. The findings include. Observations on 6/16, 6/17, 6/21, 6/22, 6/23 did not reveal the Federal requirements related to the posting of staff. The total number of and actual hours worked by categories of Registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and Certified nursing aides per shift was not observed in any part of the facility. An interview of the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 6/23/21 at 1:37 PM revealed that on each unit there is a staff posting and at the front desk there is a posting of all the shifts. The Nursing Home Administrator was informed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$50,122 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $50,122 — penalty dated 2024-10-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 86 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avalon Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHamilton, NJ 1 of 5Bay Harbor Post Acute Healthcare CenterSalisbury, MD 1 of 5Blueberry Hill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CtrBeverly, MA 1 of 5Canterbury Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5Cape Cod Post Acute CareBrewster, MA 1 of 5Crest Pointe Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterPt Pleasant, NJ 1 of 5Highland Park Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterChelsea, MA 1 of 5Mount Holly Rehabilitation & Healthcare CenterLumberton, NJ 1 of 5Nashua Post Acute CareNashua, NH 2 of 5Arbor Ridge Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWayne, NJ 2 of 5Atlantic View Post AcuteNewport News, VA 2 of 5Bayview Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterNorth Kingstown, RI 2 of 5Collingswood Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRockville, MD 2 of 5Elmhurst Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterProvidence, RI 2 of 5Graduate Post AcutePhiladelphia, PA 2 of 5Heritage Hills Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSmithfield, RI 2 of 5Laurel Brook Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMount Laurel, NJ 2 of 5Lawrence Rehab & Hcc/The Meadows At LawrenceLawrenceville, NJ 2 of 5Lawrence Rehabilitation HospitalLawrenceville, NJ 2 of 5Lighthouse Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRevere, MA 2 of 5Lincolnwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterNorth Providence, RI 2 of 5North End Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterBoston, MA 2 of 5Palm Springs Post AcuteChelmsford, MA 2 of 5Riverview Healthcare CommunityCoventry, RI 2 of 5Roosevelt Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterPhiladelphia, PA 2 of 5Southampton Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5Springfield Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterSpringfield, PA 2 of 5West Chester Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWest Chester, PA 2 of 5Westgate Hills Rehab & Healthcare CtrBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Willow Brook Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWilmington, MA 2 of 5YORK Post AcuteYorktown, VA 3 of 5Alexandria Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 3 of 5Aspen Hill Rehabiliation & Healthcare CenterHaverhill, MA 3 of 5Belmont Bay Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWoodbridge, VA 3 of 5Brighton Post Acute CareBrighton, MA 3 of 5Cambridge Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMoorestown, NJ 3 of 5Capitol Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHarrisburg, PA 3 of 5Chelsea Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterGoochland, VA 3 of 5Exton Post AcuteExton, PA 3 of 5Hampden Post AcuteWilbraham, MA

Showing 40 of 86; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
YR 2013 INVESTMENT TR UA 03252013Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF22%since 10/04/2018
CIBC BANK USAOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 07/01/2018
BAILEY, LESHAWNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/12/2024
GUNTHORPE, JAHIRIIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/09/2024
VIROJA, YOGESHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
POSEN, MINDEEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
MARQUIS LIMITED LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
NUTRACO LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/09/2021
RELIANT PRO REHAB LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/31/2025
RIZQUI, IBRAHIMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2022
KOHN FAM TR GST EXEMPT UAD 3-25-13OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
NFR 2020 IRRV TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
ORCHARD HILL PROPERTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/04/2018
QUINTO GUARDIAN LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/04/2018
RSBRMK HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
SK 2013 INVESTMENT TR UA 03252013OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/04/2018
TRYKO GUARDIAN HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/04/2018
UAK 2020 IRRV TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
UKR CONSULTING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/04/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.7M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 19%Other / private 8%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$396per resident / day
operating cost
$12,048per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$396per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215069. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next