No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

St Francois Manor

1180 Old Jackson Road, Farmington, MO 63640 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 118 certified beds · (573) 760-1700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (573) 760-1700 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 21 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (21) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 25% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
1565 Ste Genevieve Ave · (573) 431-6013 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
18 W Karsch Blvd · (573) 454-2650 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
140 Vierse Dr · (573) 756-7272 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(573) 756-0900 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1260 E Karsch Blvd · (573) 701-9510

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased0.0%18.1%15.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.5%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.7%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.2%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication49.1%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%4.5%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control0.8%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table78.5%23.5%17.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.982.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days8.492.331.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.01U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.01hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 0% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 80% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.17
RN hours/ resident / day
0.46
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.33
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.95
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.16
RN hoursweekends
62.8%
Total nursing turnover
62.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 86.5 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.95 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.17 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.09 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.17 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-13)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-13)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to notify the resident representative of a change in the resident's medication regimen for one resident (Resident #1) of nine sampled residents. The facility census was 85.Review of the facility's policy titled, Management of Psychotropic Medications and Unnecessary Medications, dated 04/2025, showed staff were directed to do the following: - Informed consent: The process in which a resident, or their legal representative is provided with information about their medication regimen, including risk, benefits, and alternatives and is given the opportunity to accept or refuse the prescribed treatment. 1. Review of Resident #1's quarterly Multiple Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument required to be completed by the facility staff, dated 01/09/26 showed:- Independent in cognitive skills for daily decision-making; - Diagnoses of stroke, non traumatic brain dysfunction and traumatic brain dysfunction;- Independent with activities of daily living. Review of the Physician Order Sheet (POS), showed:- Diagnosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed manage or prevent pain, consistent with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care, current professional standards of practice, and the resident's goals and preferences for one resident (Resident #3) of 11 sampled residents. The facility census was 86.The facility failed to provide policies and procedures for following through on physician's referrals and physician's orders. The facility failed to provide policies and procedures regarding obtaining informed consent prior to receiving a medication increase or changes in the resident's medication regimen. 1. Review of Resident #3's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 02/12/2026, showed:- Cognitively intact;- Independent with activities of daily living;- Diagnoses of low back pain unspecified, pain unspecified, anxiety, depression, schizophrenia (a chronic, severe brain disorder affecting characterized by a distorted interpretation of reality, including hallucinations, delusions, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's physician or guardian after a change in the resident's condition for one resident (Resident #1) out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 89. Review of the facility's policy titled, Condition Change, Resident, undated, showed:- The purpose of these guidelines is to observe, record, and report any condition change to the attending physician so that proper treatment can be implemented;- Notify resident's responsible party, notify physician of condition change, need for treatment orders, and/or medication order. 1. Review of Resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the facility), dated 08/28/25, showed:- admission to the facility on [DATE];- Diagnoses of cerebral palsy (a congenital disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture), seizure disorder (uncontrolled jerking, loss of consciousness, blank stares, or other symptoms caused by abnormal electrical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders when two follow up appointments were not made on admission and parameters for intermittent urinary catheterization were not implemented and followed for one resident (Resident #1) out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 89.Review of the facility's policy titled, Physician Orders, undated, showed: - Specify why a urinary catheter (a thin, flexible, rubber or plastic tube that drains urine from the bladder) is ordered for as needed;- Specify the size of the catheter and the frequency of change;- Did not address following physician's orders. The facility did not provide a policy for intermittent catheterization or making appointments. Review of Resident #1's medical record showed:- An admission date of 08/21/25;- Diagnoses of cerebral palsy (a group of lifelong movement disorders that affect a person's ability to control their muscles), seizures (abnormal electrical activity in your brain), urine retention (a condition where a person is unable to empty their bladder completely),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. These practices had the potential to affect all residents who are served food from the kitchen. The facility's census was 78. The facility did not provide a policy regarding freezer temperatures or freezer temperature logs. 1. Observations on 06/11/25 at 1:08 P.M. and 06/12/25 at 3:14 P.M. of the walk-in refrigerator showed: - One bag of block cheese not dated or labeled; - One box of lunch meat not dated; - Three boxes of vegetables not dated. Observation on 06/13/25 at 9:35 A.M. of the walk-in refrigerator showed: - One bag of block cheese not dated or labeled; - One box of lunch meat not dated; - Multiple cases of food not dated; - Multiple bags of vegetables not dated. 2. Observation on 06/11/25 at 12:47 P.M. of the walk-in freezer showed: - Temperature of 20 °F; - Three thawed unopened bags of popsicles; - An open case of thawed cinnamon rolls; - A case of softened ice cream cups. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0575 — isolated
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to post, in a form and manner accessible to the residents and resident representatives, the required telephone number to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) hotline (to report allegations of abuse and neglect), or a list of names, addresses, and phone numbers of the State Survey Agency (SSA). The facility's census was 78. The facility did not provide a policy regarding the posting of DHSS hotline number and SSA information. Observation of the facility from 06/10/25 through 06/13/25 showed: - The facility did not post the name, address and toll free telephone number for the DHSS Abuse and Neglect Hotline or the SSA information in a form and manner accessible to residents or visitors. During an interview on 06/13/25 at 8:25 A.M., the Administrator said the DHSS hotline number was supposed to be posted in the front lobby next to the Resident Rights poster, but that it had apparently been replaced with the number for a pizza restaurant.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess two residents (Residents #10 and #57) out of two sampled residents for the use of side rails and to provide ongoing monitoring, supervision and routine maintenance of the beds with the side rails in use. The facility's census was 78. The facility failed to provide a policy regarding side rails. 1. Review of Resident #10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment completed by the facility), dated 04/18/25, showed: - Cognition intact; - Independent with bed mobility; - Diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar), falls, osteoarthritis (a type of arthritis marked by cartilage deterioration of joints and vertebrae), extrapyramidal and movement disorder (group of side effects impacting motor system), and seizures (a burst of uncontrolled electrical activity between brain cells that causes temporary abnormalities in muscle tone or movements like stiffness, twitching or limpness, behaviors, sensations,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours per day, seven days a week. This deficiency had the potential to affect all residents. The facility's census was 78. The facility did not provide an RN coverage policy. Review of the Nurse Staffing Sheets for March 1, 2025 - June 9, 2025 showed: - No RN scheduled for 05/18/25; - No RN scheduled for 06/01/25; - No RN scheduled for two days out of 101 days. Review of the Nursing Schedule for March 1, 2025 - June 9, 2025 showed: - No RN scheduled for 05/18/25; - No RN scheduled for 06/01/25; - No RN scheduled for two days out of 101 days. During an interview on 06/13/25 at 12:16 P.M., the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) said they would expect the facility to have RN coverage for at least eight hours a day for seven days a week.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing data with all the required components in a clear and readable format. The facility's census was 78. The facility did not provide a policy regarding posting of nurse staffing data. Observations of the nurse staffing information posted on the wall across from the nurse's station showed: - On 06/10/25 at 2:40 P.M., the posted nurse staffing information, dated 06/09/25, with no information for 06/10/25; - On 06/11/25 at 2:02 P.M., the posted nurse staffing information, dated 06/10/25, with no information for 06/11/25; - On 06/12/25 at 2:40 P.M., the posted nurse staffing information, dated 06/11/25, with no information for 06/12/25; - On 06/13/25 at 8:02 A.M., the posted nurse staffing information, dated 06/11/25, with no information for 06/13/25. During an interview on 06/13/25 at 12:10 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said she was responsible for posting the nurse staffing information and she thought she was supposed to post the information for the day before. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review of two medication rooms and two medication carts, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted practices for one medication cart out of two sampled medication carts and one medication room out of two sampled medication rooms. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility's census was 78. Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medications, undated, showed: - No discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals may be retained for use; - All such drugs must be returned to the issuing pharmacy or destroyed in accordance with established guidelines. 1. Observation of the 600 Hall Medication Cart on 06/13/25 at 8:58 A.M. showed: - 21 tablets of famotidine (used to prevent and treat heartburn) 10 milligrams (mg) with an expiration date of 02/2025. 2. Observation of the Nurses' Medication Room on 06/13/25 at 9:10 A.M. showed: - Eight tablets of nitroglycerin (treats/relieves chest pain) sublingual (under the tongue) 0.4 mg tablets with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 11 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to conduct regular inspections of all bed frames, mattresses, and side rails for possible entrapment as part of a regular maintenance program for two residents (Resident #10 and #57) out of two sampled residents. The facility's census was 78. The facility failed to provide a policy regarding bed frame, mattress, and side rail inspections. 1. Review of Resident #10's medical record showed: - No maintenance inspections/assessments for possible entrapment for the side rails. Observations on 06/10/25 at 10:45 A.M. and 06/12/25 at 3:14 P.M. showed: - The resident lay in bed with a 1/4 U-shaped side rail on the upper right side of the bed. 2. Review of Resident #57's medical record showed: - No maintenance inspections/assessments for possible entrapment for the side rails. Observations on 06/10/25 at 11:30 A.M. and 06/13/25 at 9:30 A.M. showed: - The resident lay in bed with a 1/4 U-shaped side rail on the upper right side of the bed. During an interview on 06/13/25 at 9:28 A.M., the Maintenance Director said he/she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders regarding medication for one resident (Resident #1) out of three sampled residents. The census was 80. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration Guidelines dated March, 2015, showed: - It is the purpose of this facility that the residents receive their medications on a timely basis and in accordance with established policies. Drug administration shall be delivered as an act in which an authorized person, in accordance with all laws and regulations governing such acts, gives a single dose of a prescribed drug or biological to a resident. The complete act of administration entails removing an individual dose from a previously dispensed, properly labeled container (including a unit dose container), verifying it with the physician's orders, giving the individual dose to the proper resident and promptly recording the information. 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record showed: - Date of admission [DATE]; -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a privacy curtain to maintain privacy for two residents (Resident #3 and #10) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 77. 1. Observation on 06/10/24 at 11:15 A.M., showed: - Resident #3 lay in his/her bed; - Resident #10 sat on his/her bed and listened to music; - No privacy curtain between the beds. 2. Observation on 06/11/24 at 9:03 A.M. showed: - Resident #3 lay in his/her bed and folded clothes; - Resident #10 opened the bedroom door, entered the room, and sat on his/her bed; - No privacy curtain between the beds. During an interview on 06/11/24 at 9:03 A.M., Resident # 3 said he/she wanted more privacy. He/She liked the roommate but did not need him/her knowing everything he/she did at all the time. He/She was in a wheelchair and did not have enough room in the bathroom to change with privacy so he/she had to change in front of the roommate. During an interview on 06/11/24 at 9:06 A.M., Resident #10 said he/she had no privacy and struggled to sleep because he/she could see the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 77. Review of facility's policy titled, Deep Clean Schedule, undated, showed: - A deep clean should be performed every four-six weeks; - The housekeeping supervisor must develop a deep clean schedule. 1. Observations of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 06/10/24 at 10:25 A.M., and 06/13/24 at 11:12 A.M., showed a three inch (in.) circular hole next to the bathroom door. 2. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 06/10/24 at 11:00 A.M., showed: - A three inch hole in ceiling above the bed next to the window; - No door on the closet; - The dresser missing the top drawer; - The room walls near the bathroom with a brown film and small brown dots; - A gray/black fuzzy substance covered the bathroom vent. 3. Observations of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 06/10/24 at 11:15 A.M., and 06/13/24 at 11:13…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess and provide supportive interventions for six residents (Resident #3, #17, #27, #33, #41 and #51) with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event - either experiencing it or witnessing it; symptoms may include flashbacks, nightmares and severe anxiety, as well as uncontrollable thoughts about the event) out of six sampled residents. The facility's census was 77. The facility did not provide a policy regarding PTSD. 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record showed: - An admission date of 05/09/23; - Diagnoses of post traumatic stress disorder PTSD, depression (a serious medical illness that negatively affects how you feel, the way you think, and how you act), schizophrenia (a long term mental disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, or behave clearly, sometimes including delusions or hallucinations), major depressive disorder (MDD - long-term loss of pleasure or interest in life), anxiety (persistent worry and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement procedures to ensure medications were accurately administered, documented, disposed of and reconciled for one resident (Resident #3) out of 18 sampled residents and for one resident (Resident #8) outside the sample. The facility census was 77. Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Monitoring and Management, revised January 2018, showed: - A new medication order is evaluated for dose, route of administration, duration, monitoring in agreement with current clinical practice, guidelines, or manufacturer's specifications for use, a written diagnosis supports each medication, and the prescriber documents the clinical rationale for using a medication outside the stated guidelines; - The resident is evaluated before initiating, withdrawing, or withholding medications. Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage in the Facility, revised January 2018, showed: - Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted practices. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 77. Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage in the Facility, revised January 2018, showed: - Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier; - Outdated or deteriorated medications are immediately removed from the inventory, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal, and reordered from pharmacy if a current order exists; - Medication storage conditions are monitored on a quarterly basis by the consultant pharmacist or pharmacy designee and corrective action taken if problems are identified; - The nurse will check the expiration date of each medication before administering it; - No expired medication will be administered to a resident; - Nursing staff should consult with the dispensing pharmacist for any questions related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. This has the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 71. Record Review of the facility's policy titled, Can Opener, showed: - Immediately after use remove the stand from base; - Wash blade with a brush in hot detergent solution; - Run through the dishwasher and air dry; - Wash base with hot detergent solution, use scrub brush, rinse with clear water and let dry; - Re-assemble the stand in base; - Keep an extra blade on hand at all times. Record Review of the facility's policy titled, Cleaning Floors, showed: - Kitchen floor maintenance will be done after each meal, spills need to be mopped up immediately; - Place caution signs around all areas that will be wet; - Remove all mobile equipment from the area being mopped; - Sweep the floor pushing all debris forward using dustpan to remove debris; - Prepare detergent solution according to manufacturer instructions a two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure garbage dumpsters and trash receptacles were covered for four of four days of observation. The facility census was 71. 1. Observation of the dumpster area on 1/09/23 at 12:00 P.M. showed the following: - Two, 8 yd. (yard) dumpsters filled with clear trash bags that were full of refuse; - One dumpster with lids entirely opened. 2. Observation of the dumpster area on 1/09/23 at 3:26 P.M. showed the following: - Two 8 yd. dumpsters with lids entirely opened. 3. Observation of the dumpster area on 1/10/23 at 8:16 A.M. showed the following: - Two 8 yd. dumpsters partially filled with lids entirely opened on each side. 4. Observations of the dumpster area on 1/11/23 at 8:00 A.M. showed the following: - Two 8 yd. dumpsters with lids entirely opened; - One 8 yd. dumpster filled with clear trash bags that were full of refuse. 5. Observations of the dumpster area on 1/12/23 at 8:23 A.M. showed the following: - One 8 yd. dumpster with lids entirely opened. During an interview on 1/11/23 at 4:09 P.M., Dietary Aide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents at the facility. The facility census was 71. Record Review of the facility's Resident Council minutes, dated 10/07/23, 11/4/23, and 12/02/22, showed: - Residents were concerned that toilets, drains, sinks, and unit bathroom (shower room) needed cleaned; - Residents were concerned that rooms, bathrooms, and the dining room needed cleaned; - Residents were concerned that rooms are not cleaned properly. Observation of the exterior of the door to the ice machine on 300 hall on 1/09/23 at 10:39 A.M., 12:53 P.M., 2:46 P.M., 3:16 P.M. and on 1/12/23 at 12:10 P.M. showed: - A four-inch swath of brown colored grime along the edge of the white door from the level of the door handle to approximately 12 inches above the doorknob to nine inches below the door handle. Observation of the exterior of the door on room [ROOM NUMBER] on 1/09/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve the highest level of function for one resident (Resident #72) out of 22 sampled residents. The facility census was 71. Record review of Resident #72's medical record showed: - An admission date of 11/16/22; - Diagnoses of Unspecified fracture of right femur, initial encounter for closed fracture (Admission), Chronic instability of knee, right knee. Record review of an After Visit Summary for Resident #72 dated 11/22/22 showed a physician's order for physical therapy. Record review of an After Visit Summary for Resident #72 dated 12/15/22 showed a physician's order for physical therapy on a regular basis ideally with emphasis on gait training quad strengthening endurance range of motion. During an interview on 1/11/23 at 2:30 P.M., Resident #72 said he/she had not received therapy since being admitted in the facility. During an interview on 1/11/23 at 2:08 P.M., the Social services designee said that restorative staff has seen Resident #72 and he/she doesn't…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN — 56 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.4+1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.8+1.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 52.4+1.6 vs chain
The other 55 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Camdenton Windsor EstatesCamdenton, MO 1 of 5Crestview HomeBethany, MO 1 of 5Grand River Health CareChillicothe, MO 1 of 5Joplin GardensJoplin, MO 1 of 5Lebanon North Nursing & RehabLebanon, MO 1 of 5Lewis & Clark GardensSaint Charles, MO 1 of 5Maryville Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterMaryville, MO 1 of 5Pacific Care CenterPacific, MO 1 of 5Parkside ManorColumbia, MO 1 of 5Pin Oaks Living CenterMexico, MO 1 of 5River City Living CommunityJefferson City, MO 1 of 5Rocky Ridge ManorMansfield, MO 1 of 5South Hampton Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterColumbia, MO 1 of 5Springfield VillaSpringfield, MO 1 of 5Strafford Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterStrafford, MO 1 of 5Troy ManorTroy, MO 1 of 5Villa At Blue Ridge, TheColumbia, MO 1 of 5Warrenton ManorWright City, MO 1 of 5Woodland Hills Healthcare And RehabilitationJacksonville, AR 2 of 5Brookhaven Nursing & RehabSpringfield, MO 2 of 5Carroll HouseCarrollton, MO 2 of 5Current River Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterDoniphan, MO 2 of 5Eldon Nursing & RehabEldon, MO 2 of 5Forsyth Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterForsyth, MO 2 of 5Fulton Nursing & RehabFulton, MO 2 of 5Grandview Healthcare CenterWashington, MO 2 of 5Lebanon South Nursing & RehabLebanon, MO 2 of 5Point Lookout Nursing & RehabHollister, MO 2 of 5Shepherd Of The Hills Living CenterBranson, MO 2 of 5Sunset HomeMaysville, MO 2 of 5Willard Care CenterWillard, MO 2 of 5Windsor Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWindsor, MO 3 of 5Claru Deville Nursing CenterFredericktown, MO 3 of 5Glasgow GardensGlasgow, MO 3 of 5Glendale Gardens Nursing & RehabSpringfield, MO 3 of 5Hartville Care CenterHartville, MO 3 of 5Hermitage Nursing & RehabHermitage, MO 3 of 5Maries ManorVienna, MO 3 of 5St James Living CenterSaint James, MO 4 of 5Clearview Nursing CenterSikeston, MO

Showing 40 of 55; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LINCOLN, JAMESIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2008
LINCOLN, JUDYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 10/01/2008
SIMPSON, JENNIFERIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/25/2022
LTC MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2008

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-24.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense25% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 0%Other / private 32%

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$172per resident / day
operating cost
$5,217per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$138per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265674. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next