Glenwood Rehabilitation & Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 52.9 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was protected from possible contamination at all times when staff failed to properly store and label food and when the stacked dishes while still wet. The facility had a census of 54.1. Review of the facility policy titled Food Storage (Dry, Refrigerated, and Frozen), undated, showed the following:-Foods shall be stored at appropriate temperatures and using appropriate methods to ensure the highest level of food safety;-All food items will be labeled, that must include the name of the food and the date by which it should be sold, consumed or discarded;-Discard food that has passed the expiration date, and discard food that has been prepared in the facility after seven days of storing under proper refrigeration;-Leftover contents of cans and prepared food will be stored in covered, labeled, and dated containers in refrigerators and /or freezers;-When freezing food that has been prepared on-site, ensure there is clear labeling of the item. Observation on 04/27/26, at 9:00 A.M., of the refrigerator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was free of accident hazards when the resident accessible hot water temperatures in rooms of eight residents' (Resident #41, #27, #31, #42, #3, #7, #34, and #51) measured greater than 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The facility census was 54. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding hot water temperature monitoring. Review of the American Burn Association website, updated 2002, showed the following:-Hot water caused third degree burns (full thickness burns which go through the skin and affect deeper tissue resulting in white or blackened, charred skin) at the following temperatures and time parameters:-In 1 second at 155 degrees F;-In 2 seconds at 148 degrees F;-In 5 seconds at 140 degrees F;-In 15 seconds at 133 degrees F;-In 1 minute at 127 degrees F;-In 3 minutes at 124 degrees F.-Older adults, like young children, have thinner skin so hot liquids cause deeper burns with even brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a complete infection prevention and control program when staff failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO - microorganisms, predominantly bacteria that are resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobial agents. Although the names of certain MDROs describe resistance to only one agent, these pathogens are frequently resistant to most available antimicrobial agents) that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities)) when providing wound and incontinent care to one resident (Resident #3) with a wound. Staff failed to completed proper hand hygiene while providing incontinent cares for two residents (Resident #3 and #47). Staff failed to ensure Tuberculin Skin Tests (TST) were completed in accordance with the requirements for tuberculosis (TB - an infectious disease that primarily affects the lungs, characterized by fever, cough, and difficulty…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL - dressing, grooming, bathing, eating, and toileting) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when the facility failed to document reapproaches after bathing refusals for two residents (Residents #28 and #50) of 19 residents reviewed. The facility census was 54.Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living, dated 09/24/25, showed the following information:-The facility provides each resident with care, treatment, and services according to the resident's individualized care plan;-Based on the comprehensive assessment of each resident, facility staff will ensure that the resident's ability to perform activities of daily living does not decline unless the resident's medical condition circumstances make the decline unavoidable. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to showers. 1. Review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication error rates did not exceed five percent when the facility completed two medication errors out of an 25 opportunities (an 8% error rate) affecting two residents (Resident #53 and #2). The facility census was 54.Review of the facility procedure titled Medication Pass Tips, dated 05/2019, showed the following:-Prior to preparing medication verify the resident's identity, verify each drug against the electronic medical record (eMAR); and if the resident requires the medication is to be crushed; check to see if the drug can be crushed;-Verify the route against the eMAR;-Administer each medication as instructed on the eMAR and within the timeframe established by the facility;-For insulin; prime insulin pens with two units (u) before each use. 1. Review of Resident #53's face sheet (brief look at resident information) showed the following:-admission date of 03/08/24;-Diagnoses included hypokalemia (low potassium). Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when the facility failed to administer noon insulin on dialysis (a life- sustaining treatment for kidney failure, filtering waste and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys have less than 10-15 % function) days and failed to prime the insulin pen before administration for one resident (Resident #2). The facility census was 54.Review of the facility procedure titled Medication Pass Tips, dated 05/2019, showed administer each medication as instructed on the electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) and within the timeframe established by the facility. 1. Review of Resident #2's face sheet (brief look at resident information) showed the following:-admission date of 11/05/25;-Diagnoses include chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and dependence on renal (kidney) dialysis. Review of the resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool filled out by facility staff), dated 04/01/26, showed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from significant medication errors when one staff member (Certified Medication Tech (CMT) D) administered another resident's medication to one resident (Resident #1) resulting in a drop in blood pressure and the resident being sent to the hospital. A sampled of seven residents were reviewed in a facility with a census of 50.Review of the facility policy titled Medication Monitoring and Management, revised January 2019, showed the following:-Medications are administered at the frequency and times indicated in the prescriber orders;-The consultant pharmacist, or designated pharmacy personnel, at the request of the facility observes the medication administration techniques of staff and assists and advises the facility in conducting routine medication administration observations, including identifying the drug given, identification of the resident, prep for administration, time of administration, technique, and documentation.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to maintain a complete infection prevention and control program when staff failed to ensure Tuberculin Skin Tests (TST) were completed in accordance with the requirements for tuberculosis (TB - a communicable disease that affects the lungs characterized by fever, cough, and difficulty breathing) testing for long-term care employees and per facility policy for three staff members (Director of Nursing (DON), Activity Director (AD), and Laundry E) of ten sampled staff members. The facility census was 36. Review of the facility's policy, titled Tuberculosis Control, undated, showed the following: -All employees will be screened for TB; -Once the decision has been made to employ an individual, the individual will be asked for documentation of a prior Purified Protein Derivative (PPD - a skin test to determine if someone has tuberculosis); -If the employee does not have documentation of a prior PPD, the first step PPD will be administered by the nursing department, documented on the Employee Immunization Record, and must be read…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify and coordinate with the State-designated authority following newly evident or possible serious mental illness for one resident (Resident #7) who had a temporary approved level two Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR - a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disability are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long-term care. The PASARR requires that all applicants to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility be evaluated for a serious mental disorder and/or intellectual disability and be offered the most appropriate integrated setting for their needs (in the community, a nursing facility, or acute care setting) and receive the services they need in those settings). The facility census was 36. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding PASARR requirements. 1. Review of Resident #7's face sheet (a brief information sheet about the resident) showed the following: -admission date of 12/09/20; -Diagnoses included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) level one was retained in the resident's medical record and accessible for one resident (Resident #26) of three residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 36. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding PASARR requirements. 1. Review of Resident #26's face sheet (provides basic profile information) showed the following: -admission date of 01/06/22; -Diagnoses included schizophrenia (mental disorder affecting ability to think, feel, and behave clearly), anxiety disorder, psychotic disorder with delusions (firmly held false beliefs) due to known physiological condition, and encephalopathy (brain disease that alters brain function or structure). Review of the resident's care plan, last updated 04/15/24, showed the following information: -On 09/07/22, staff care planned a history of hollering out and cursing and talking to the voices in his/her head. Resident often speaks of being raped and fighting the demons; -On 01/19/23, staff care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN — 56 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 32% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO