New Eastwood Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 377 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 85.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 98 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 88.4 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions in the kitchen. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on September 3, 2024, at 9:47 a.m., revealed the following: In the walk-in freezer, there was an accumulation of ice at the entry way, on the shelves, and on boxes of potato hashbrowns and nutrition shakes. The ice build up prevented the door from latching and forming a seal when closed. In the walk-in refrigerator, there was a pan of raw ground meat stored above a pan of raw whole beef. At the coffee preparation area, there was an accumulation of dust on the underside of a window air conditioning unit that was above coffee filters and plastic lids. On a storage shelf under a food preparation area, there were two containers of peanut butter stored next to spray bottles of chemical sanitizing solution. In the milk cooler, there was no thermometer observed in the cooler. There was an accumulation of spilled milk on the bottom of the cooler. There was an odor of spoiled milk in the cooler. There were two fans with an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services in a manner respectful of each resident's dignity for one of 18 sampled residents. (Resident 79) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 79 had diagnoses that included obstructive uropathy, urinary retention, and enlarged prostate. On August 6, 2024, a physician ordered that Resident 79 utilize an indwelling urinary catheter for urination. Review of the care plan revealed that staff was to maintain a dignity bag or privacy cover over the collection bag when in social settings and when visible to others. Observations on September 3, 2024, at 11:45 a.m., revealed that Resident 79 was seated at an exercise machine in the physical therapy room, and at 1:10 p.m., was seated in a wheelchair in a common lounge area. The indwelling urinary catheter bag was not covered and contained urine. Multiple residents and staff were in the area when observed. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing services.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement physician's orders for four of 18 sampled residents. (Residents 35, 47, 49, 244) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 35 had diagnoses that included generalized edema and acute kidney failure. A physician's order dated August 8, 2024, directed staff to weigh the resident every Thursday. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for August 2024, revealed that there was no evidence that staff weighed Resident 35 as ordered on August 22 and 29, 2024. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 47 had diagnoses that included end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis and congestive heart failure. A physician's order dated August 31, 2024, directed staff to weigh the resident daily. A review of the MAR for September 2024, revealed that there was no evidence that staff weighed Resident 47 as ordered on September 1 and 3, 2024. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 49 had diagnoses that included severe protein-calorie malnutrition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide physician ordered therapeutic diets for two of 18 sampled residents. (Residents 12, 14) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 12 had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia, and protein calorie malnutrition. A physician's order dated December 20, 2020, directed staff to provide a mechanical soft diet with the addition of enhanced foods. Review of the care plan revealed an intervention for staff to provide the resident's diet as ordered, which included enhanced foods. On September 4, 2024, at 12:27 p.m., the resident was observed eating the lunch meal in the dining room. The tray ticket indicated that the resident was to receive fortified mashed potatoes, an enhanced food. There was no fortified food item or enhanced mashed potatoes observed on the resident's tray. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 14 had diagnoses that included muscle weakness, muscle wasting, and dysphagia. A physician's order dated October 9,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility provided documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a notice of non coverage for skilled care services and the appeal process was provided to the resident or representative for one of four residents reviewed. (Resident 1) Findings include: Review of Information for Notice of Non-coverage for Medicare (Form CMS-10123-NOMNC) revealed that the facility must inform the resident or resident representative when skilled services will end, and also provide information regarding the ability to appeal the decision. Clinical record reivew revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic pain syndrome, deconditioning and osteomyelitis. The resident had an order by the physician for skilled therapy services. It was determined by therapy, that the last day for covered therapy services was to be on January 12, 2024. There was no documentation that the resident or representative was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner on two of two nursing units. (Sandlewood and Birchwood) Review of the facility policy entitled, Foods Brought by Family/Visitors, dated January 3, 2023, revealed perishable food items were to be labeled with the resident's name, the item, and the use-by date. Expired food items were to be discarded. Observation of the pantry on the Sandlewood unit on October 4, 2023, at 12:01 p.m., revealed the inside of the microwave was dirty with multiple areas of dried food splatter. There were four areas where the interior of the microwave had bubbled and were covered with rust spots on each. In the refrigerator, there was a container of chicken noodle soup, a package of cheese slices, two opened bottles of ranch dressing, and an opened bag of snap peas. These items were not dated or labelled with a name on them. In the freezer, there were three boxes of chicken pot pies and a frozen meal that did not have a name on them. In an interview on October 4, 2023,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, observation and resident interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a dignified environment for one of 18 sampled residents. (Resident 22) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the Resident 22 had diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis, insomnia, and chronic pain. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated September 30, 2022, revealed that the resident had no cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance from staff with activities of daily living. In an interview on November 8, 2022, at 10:41 a.m., Resident 22 stated that she wished she had a way to keep track of when she took medications and when they are due because she doesn't know the time. At that time the clock on the wall across from the resident's bed displayed the incorrect time. Observations on November 8, 2022, from 10:41 a.m. through 12:14 p.m., and on November 9, 2022, from 9:40 a.m. through 12:20 p.m. revealed the clock continued to display the incorrect time. 28 Pa. Code 201.29(j) Resident rights. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• No harm found · C2023-10-05 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to dispose of trash and refuse properly. Findings include: Observation of the dumpster area on October 3, 2023, at 9:41 a.m., revealed various items on the ground next to the dumpster, including two used briefs and several pieces of crushed plastic items. 28 Pa Code 201.18(b)(3) Management.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $812K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA