Aviata At Central Park
702 S Kings Ave, Brandon, FL 33511 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (813) 651-1818 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $7,456 in federal fines (most recent 2023-08-28)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.4% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.5% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 4.6% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.7% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.5% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.6% | 14.4% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.6% | 4.5% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.2% | 10.5% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 1.7% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.2% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.5% | 9.1% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.19 | 2.13 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.44 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 176 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 81.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 143 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.8%CMS range 42.2–57.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.4%CMS range 8.5–15.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 81.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 65.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 58.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.2%CMS range 5.6–14.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.97 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 116.8 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.32 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed by administering medications outside parameters without notifying the physician and the IDT (Interdisciplinary) team for one resident (#1) of three residents reviewed.Findings included: Review of Resident #1's admission record revealed an admission date of 9/15/25 with diagnoses to include but not limited to chronic pain, coronary artery bypass graft, bilateral below the knee amputations (BKA), cardiogenic shock, acute respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes type 2, hypertension and dyspnea. Review of Resident #1's care plan focus: Resident #1 has alteration in acute/chronic pain. Goal: Resident #1 will have minimal interruption in normal activities due to pain. Interventions included to administer analgesia as per orders. Review of Resident #1's order summary report showed Percocet 5-325 mg 1 tablet every 6 hours as needed for moderate pain 4-7 [pain level] ordered on 9/16/25 and discontinued on 9/22/25. Review of Resident #1's medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-10-08 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans for code status were in place for three residents (#1, #2, and #3) of three residents sampled. Resident #1 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, altered mental status, generalized muscle weakness, dysphagia, obstructive sleep apnea, stage III chronic kidney disease, hypertension, anemia, sepsis, pneumonia, metabolic encephalopathy, congestive heart failure (CHF), and dependence on supplemental oxygen.Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 9/8/25 showed resident was a full code. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan revealed no care plan for a code status. Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-08 · tag F0659 — isolatedProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had the skills, knowledge and certification necessary to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) services for one resident (#1) of three residents sampled.Review of Resident #1's admission record revealed a readmission date of [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, altered mental status, generalized muscle weakness, dysphagia, obstructive sleep apnea, stage III chronic kidney disease, hypertension, anemia, sepsis, pneumonia, metabolic encephalopathy, congestive heart failure (CHF), and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Review of Resident #1's physician order dated [DATE] showed the resident was a full code. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan revealed no care plan for a code status. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed a note dated [DATE] at 8:25 a.m. authored by Staff A, Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure four residents (Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, and Resident #8) of five residents observed requiring assistance with eating, were provided a dignified dining experience. Findings included: On 1/7/25 at 12:50 p.m., an observation showed a staff member standing next to the bed of Resident #5 with utensil in hand. The staff member identified themselves as a speech therapist. On 1/7/25 at 1:02 p.m., an observation showed a covered meal tray sitting on the over-bed table of Resident #8. On 1/7/25 at 1:03 p.m., an observation revealed Staff E, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) entered Resident #7's room and stood between the privacy curtain and Resident #7's bed. The observation showed the resident's face was level with the mid-torso of the staff member as Staff E, CNA held a cup with a straw and encouraged the resident to eat. On 1/7/25 at 1:06 p.m., Staff E, CNA left Resident #7's room and was interviewed. Staff E, CNA reported feeding Resident #8 and the resident's roommate at same time. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for three residents (Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4) of three residents sampled for care plans. Findings included: 1. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 was readmitted on [DATE] from the hospital and was discharged from the facility to the hospital on [DATE]. The admission Record also showed Resident #2 had diagnoses including but not limited to displaced comminuted fracture of shaft of right femur on 12/12/24, Parkinsonism, generalized muscle weakness, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, anemia, hypertension, and disorders of bone density. Review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed under Section C - Cognitive Patterns, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating Resident #2 was cognitively intact. The Assessment also showed under…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary treatment and services consistent with profession standards of practice related to pressure wounds/ ulcers for two residents (Resident #2 and Resident #3) of three residents sampled for pressure wounds/ ulcers. Findings included: 1. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 was readmitted on [DATE] from the hospital and was discharged from the facility to the hospital on [DATE]. The admission Record also showed Resident #2 had diagnoses including but not limited to displaced comminuted fracture of shaft of right femur on 12/12/24, Parkinsonism, generalized muscle weakness, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, anemia, hypertension, and disorders of bone density. Review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed under Section C - Cognitive Patterns, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy and procedure review the facility failed to label and store all medications in accordance with professional standards of practice for 3 of 4 medication carts, and failed to ensure all medications were stored to permit only authorized personnel access. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 1/22/24 at 8:46 AM with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) of medication cart #1, there was one unopened Lantus insulin pen with pharmacy instructions to refrigerate until opened, one opened insulin glargine pen with no resident identifier, not in original pharmacy packaging, with no date opened, or expiration date, one opened bottle of Lispro insulin with no date opened or expiration date, one unopened bottle of Aspart insulin with pharmacy instructions to refrigerate until opened, and two opened bottles of tobramycin ophthalmic solution with no date opened or expiration dates. During an interview on 1/22/2024 at 8:50 AM Staff A, LPN stated, I don't know why they [the insulins] are not refrigerated, and all medications should be in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0773 — patternProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering physician of urine culture results requiring a change in treatment for 2 of 3 residents, Residents #31 and #84, in a total sample of 39 residents. Findings include: Review of the admission record for Resident #31 documented diagnosis to include paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat), urinary tract infection, hypertensive heart disease without heart failure and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Review of the nursing progress note for Resident #31 dated 1/15/2024 read, Resident went to infectious disease appointment today, new order received from ID [infectious disease] doctor for CBC [complete blood count], CMP [complete metabolic profile], lipase, procalcitonin, U/A [urinalysis], C&S [urine culture and sensitivity] daughter aware. Review of the physician orders for Resident #31 dated 1/16/2024 read, U/A with micro C&S [culture and sensitivity] one time. Review of the lab results completed by [name of the laboratory group] for Resident #31 read, 1/17/2024 13:57 [1:57 PM]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a clean and homelike environment (Photographic evidence obtained). Findings include: 1. During an observation on 1/22/2023 at 9:03 AM, a previously repaired portion of the ceiling was split opened and was detaching from the rest of the ceiling in the hallway in front the nursing station near room [ROOM NUMBER]. During an observation on 1/23/2023 at 10:00 AM a previously repaired portion of the ceiling was split opened and was detaching from the rest of the ceiling in the hallway in front the nursing station near room [ROOM NUMBER]. 2. During an observation on 1/23/2023 at 9:54 AM, in Resident #23's room, the air vent in the ceiling had a black substance on it. The air vent was located over the resident's bed. During an observation on 12/24/2024 at 11:35 AM, in Resident #23's room, the air vent in the ceiling had a black substance on it. The air vent was located over the resident's bed. 3. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary care and services related to nail care, for 3 (Resident #48, #66, #88) of 8 residents out of a total sample of 39 residents. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 1/22/2024 at 9:50 AM, Resident #48's toenails of both feet were long and untrimmed. During an interview on 1/22/2024 at 9:50 AM, Resident #48's stated, I asked about cutting my toenails about a month ago and nobody has taken care of it. During an observation on 1/23/2024 at 2:30 PM, Resident #48's toenails of both feet were long and untrimmed. During an interview on 1/23/2024 at 2:30 PM, the resident stated, The toenails are the same. Somebody special needs to come and nobody has come. During an observation on 1/24/2024 at 8:09 AM, Resident #48 had long and untrimmed toenails. Review of the admission record for Resident #48 showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and policy and procedure review the facility failed to provide care for peripherally inserted central catheters in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 out of 2 residents, Resident #88, out of a total sample of 39 residents. Findings include: During an observation on 1/25/2024 at 12:45 PM of medication administration for Resident #88 Staff E, Registered Nurse (RN) did not perform hand hygiene, donned gloves, locked the medication cart with one of her gloved hands, knocked on Resident #88's room door with one of her gloved hands and entered Resident #88's room. Resident #88 was observed in bed with a right upper arm double lumen PICC line (peripherally inserted central catheter). Staff E touched items on Resident #88's overbed table and placed supplies on the resident's dresser with her gloved hands. Staff E did not remove the gloves, did not perform hand hygiene, and opened an intravenous (IV) tubing package and connected the IV tubing to an IV bag of antibiotics. Staff E removed the end cap from the tubing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to administer oxygen per physician's orders and according to professional standards of practice for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #5 and #27) out of a total sample of 39 residents. Findings include: During an observation on 1/22/2024 at 10:26 AM, Resident #5 was observed resting in bed receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. The oxygen concentrator was set at 4 liters. During an observation on 1/23/2024 at 7:27 AM, Resident #5 was sitting in bed with the head of bed elevated receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. The oxygen concentrator was running at 4 liters per minute. The oxygen concentrator was on her right side of the bed pushed against the wall out of the resident's reach. During an interview on 1/23/2024 at 7:27 AM Resident #5 stated, I can't reach the oxygen machine to change it. I don't have the strength to reach that far. During an observation on 1/24/24 at 7:15 AM, Resident #5 was resting in bed with the head of the bed elevated, receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. The oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection during medication administration for 2 of 6 observations. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 1/22/2024 at approximately 2:02 PM of medication cart #3, Staff, C, Registered Nurse (RN) did not perform hand hygiene and began preparing medications for Resident #84. Staff C opened the medication cart drawer, pulled the medication blister packs up but did not remove the medication blister packs out of the drawer and began to pop the medications into her bare hand, then placed them into the medication cup for a total of six medications. Staff C went to Resident #84's room and without performing hand hygiene administered the medications and returned to the medication cart. Staff C did not perform hand hygiene and began to prepare medications for another resident. During an interview on 1/22/2024 at 2:05 PM Staff C, RN stated, Oh, I didn't realize that I did that. I should not have put the medicine into my hand, they need [the medications] to go directly into the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to respond and resolve a grievance through to a conclusion for one resident (#1) out of three residents sampled for grievances. Finding included: Review of a grievance, filed on 8/31/23, revealed the following: Family was upset regarding actions taken after the resident expressed that he had chest pains. He stated the response time for 911 was too long. Also stated they were not informed of transport. The grievance investigation revealed Called family discussed constant refusal of care, family aware stated 'He's Bipolar.' Told family nurse followed MD [Medical Doctor] orders. The grievance plan revealed, Spoke with family about nursing procedures. The expected results of actions taken revealed Reassure family that appropriate steps were taken to provide care. A review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to, fracture of shaft of left femur, severe sepsis,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to mitigate the risk of a fall with major injury for one resident (#1) out of three residents sampled for falls. Findings included: On 10/9/23 at 1:50 p.m., Resident #1 was observed lying in bed. During an interview, Resident #1 did not remember falling out of bed and did not want to talk further. Review of a facility document titled, Incident by Incident type, dated 10/09/23, showed on 7/22/23 at 8:45 p.m. Resident #1 had a fall incident. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #1 was originally admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including gout, difficulty walking, idiopathic peripheral neuropathy, psychotic disorder with delusions, and lack of coordination. A diagnosis of left femur shaft fracture was added on 7/31/23. Review of Resident #1's Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Section C - Cognitive Patterns showed his Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 14,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide nursing and related services to assure one resident (#1) out of three residents sampled, attained and maintained the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being related to 1) not identifying a change in condition in a timely manner, 2) not notifying provider and resident representative of change in condition, 3) not being prepared for wound care, and 4) not ensuring pain was managed adequately. Findings included: An interview was conducted on 10/9/23 at 2:26 p.m. with Resident #1's family members. The family said on 8/20/23 they were on the phone with Resident #1, and he was complaining of pressure and pain in his chest. They said the resident was yelling ow and nurse, but no one came. One family member said they stayed on the phone with the resident. After about 40 minutes, another family member stated they called the nurses' station and told the person that answered the phone the resident was complaining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review the facility failed to respond to a pharmacist recommendation in a timely manner for one resident (#1) out of three resident sampled. Findings included: Review of a Pharmacy Consultation Report, dated 9/13/23, showed the pharmacist made a recommendation for The initial attempt at a gradual dose reduction (GDR,) please reduce Venlafaxine ER [extended release] to 75 mg (milligrams) daily AND/OR Divalproex DR [delayed release] 125 mg twice daily. The provider was notified, and he told the facility to refer to the psychiatric doctor. On 10/9/23 the psychiatric doctor had still not been notified of the pharmacist recommendation. Review of admission records showed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including mood disorder, major depressive disorder, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, chronic pain syndrome, hypertensive heart disease, stage IV pressure ulcer on sacrum, psychotic disorder with delusions and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-28 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide sufficient preparation and notification of discharge for two residents/resident representatives (#1 and #3) out of three residents reviewed for a safe and orderly discharge. Findings included: A review of Resident #1's medical record showed an admission date of 06/04/23 with diagnoses of Vascular Dementia with unspecified severity, Epilepsy unspecified, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, and mood disorder due to known physiological condition. A physician order, dated 06/07/23, showed Resident #1 had an order for an electronic monitoring device placement on the right ankle. The care plan, initiated 06/07/2023, showed Resident #1 was an elopement risk related to dementia. The goals showed Resident #1 will maintain safety though next review date and Will not leave facility unattended. An intervention included the electronic monitoring device and monitoring of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility did not ensure a clean and sanitary environment was provided during four of four days (10/10/21 - 10/13/21) related to the ice machine not being clean, nine resident rooms (#50, #51, #52, #53, #55, #56, #57, #59 and #61)) not swept or mopped, ceiling vents were filled with dirt, debris and bio-growth in six resident rooms (#53, #55, #56, #57, #59 and #61), and privacy curtains and linens stained and soiled in six resident rooms (#52, #53, #55, #56, #57 and #65) in one hall (Ground Floor - Hall A) out of six halls. Findings included: During a facility tour on 10/10/21 at 9:54 a.m., resident rooms were observed on Ground Floor - Hall A with dirt, debris, and stains on the floors and the walls. room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with stains on the walls from feeding tube spills and on the floor. room [ROOM NUMBER] was noted with a dead insect on the floor in front of bed B. In addition, the ceiling vents were observed with dirt, debris, and bio growth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-10-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and policy review the facility did not ensure that foods were served from clean and sanitary dishware during two of two lunch meal service observations, in two (lower-level dining and main level dining) of two dining rooms. Findings included: On 10/11/21 at 12:31 p.m., a dining service observation was made in the lower-level dining room during the lunch meal. A group of residents were observed in the dining area being assisted by Staff I, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). An observation was made of the round plate covers noted with stainless steel tops and bottom inserts. The top covers were in direct contact with the resident's food during transport and service. The stainless-steel parts of the bottom and top covers were noted with brown, greasy, burnt, and built-up oily residue. (Photographic Evidence was Obtained) On 10/11/21 at 12:32 p.m., an interview was conducted with Staff I, CNA. Staff I was observed uncovering residents' trays and distributing lunch. Staff I was asked if the food covers were clean. Staff I said, Does not look clean to me.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-13 · tag F0577 — isolatedAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the results of the most recent state or federal surveys were readily accessible to residents, or visitors to examine the survey results without having to ask staff to see them. Findings included: During a confidential Resident Council meeting conducted on 10/11/21 at 10:00 a.m. with a group of five alert and oriented residents, the group reported they were not aware of where the survey results were kept. On 10/11/21 following the Resident Council meeting an inspection of the facility revealed a posting in a wood frame sitting on a small desk in the front lobby entrance indicating The Survey Results Are Here. Closer inspection of the desk revealed a box on the desk which contained survey results in sheet protectors (Photographic Evidence Obtained). Observations of the ground floor entrance revealed a wood framed posting that indicated the survey results could be found by the lobby. Additional inspection of the facility revealed the survey results are located in the lobby which was an area not accessible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to honor resident rights, by not ensuring 1. the facility had a system in place for residents to promptly receive mail on the day that it was delivered by the US Postal Service to include weekends, and 2. the privacy for all residents in a confidential and private manner related to having residents wear a colored wrist band to identify who had or had not been vaccinated for COVID-19. Findings included: 1. A confidential Resident Council meeting was conducted on 10/11/21 at 10:00 a.m. with a group of five alert and oriented residents in attendance. An interview with the Resident Council Group during the meeting revealed the US Postal Service delivered mail to the facility daily from Monday to Saturday. The group reported the mail was received during the week, and delivered to the residents by the Activities Department. The Resident Council Group reported that no one delivered mail to the residents on Saturdays and Sundays. An interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews the facility did not ensure the care plan was implemented for falls related to floor mats for one resident (#55) of four residents sampled for falls, and for not ensuring partial dentures were provided for one resident (#55) of thirty-six sampled residents. Findings included: Resident #55 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of dementia with behavioral disturbance and acquired absence of right and left above knee, upon review of the admission Record. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], reflected a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the progress notes in the medical record revealed the following: 10/8/21 Resident was found on the floor in front of his bed by CNA (certified nursing assistant) during rounds. It appeared he fell out of his bed. No apparent no injury noted at this time. ROM (range of motion) performed. Resident denies any complaint of pain, stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for enternal feeding by not ensuring the physician's order for the tube feeding rate was followed for one resident (#195) of six residents with tube feedings. Findings included: Review of the admission record revealed Resident #195 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of moderate protein calorie malnutrition and gastrostomy. Review of the 10/4/21 Initial Nutritional Evaluation revealed the following: III. Tube Feeding/Oral Nutrition A. Tube feeding orders: yes B. Tube feeding orders: Jevity 1.5 at 65 ml (milliliters) per hour Z5. Plan/Recommendations: Jevity 1.5 to run at 55 ml per hour times 20 hours/day. Review of the physician's orders in the electronic medical record dated 10/8/21 reflected Enteral feed order every shift 55 ml/ hr (hour) for 20 hours. Further review of the physician's orders dated 10/10/21 showed Jevity 1.5 at 55 ml/hr fro 20 hours. Review of the care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the medication error rate was below 5.00%. A total of twenty-five medications were observed administered and three errors were identified for two (Resident #41 and #48) of four residents observed. These errors constituted a medication error rate of 12 percent. Findings included: An observation of First Level medication administration on 10/12/21 at 9:09 a.m., resulted in Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse-Agency (LPN), not giving Resident #48 one capsule of Creon Delayed Release Particles 12000 Unit (Pancrelipase (Lip-Prot-Amyl)) on time and with meals as a digestive aid. During the observation Staff E, LPN confirmed the medication was late, and it was supposed to be administered at 7:30 (a.m.). Staff E, LPN stated, I came in and could not get access to the computer, it's always like this every time I work here. Staff E, LPN, further revealed he did not tell anyone in the facility that medications were late and did not call the physician. Staff E, LPN crushed a medication identified as Potassium Chloride…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure one medication was stored and locked up for one day (10/12/2021) of four days of the survey and failed to follow their policy to secure medications appropriately in three (First Floor-B Hall, First Floor - A Hall, Ground Floor - A Hall) of five medication carts. Findings included: On 10/11/2021 at 3:45 p.m., an observation of the medication cart on first floor B Hall medication cart included loose tablets as follows: two round white, one white oval, one round yellow, 1/2 yellow, and four white half pieces with a white ¼ piece. Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) confirmed the presence of the unsecured tablets. (Photographic Evidence Obtained.) On 10/11/2021 at 4:00 p.m., an observation was made of the First Floor medication cart located on the A Hall, and revealed one loose white tablet. Staff G, Registered Nurse (RN) confirmed the presence of the unsecured tablet. On 10/11/2021 at 4:15 p.m., an observation of the Ground Floor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for 5 (#11, #68, #10, #113, #35) of 33 sampled residents related to Resident #11 by failing to disinfect the glucometer and performing hand hygiene after touching the glucometer; the facility failed to ensure Resident #68 was placed on contact precautions after observation of watery odorous stool started on 1/23/20; the facility failed to ensure eye drops were administered for Resident #10 without contaminating the bottles; the facility failed to ensure staff entering Resident #113's room donned PPE and did not take in reusable equipment, and the facility failed to ensure medical waste for Resident #35 was disposed of according to their policy. Findings Included: 1. During observation of Resident #11's glucose testing, on 1/29/20 at 4:01 p.m., Staff Member I, RN, obtained the lancet and alcohol pad from the medication cart. Staff Member I, RN, knocked and asked Resident #11 if she could check his blood sugar. The resident agreed and the nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-31 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review and observations, the facility failed to offer or arrange for outside activities for 4 (#69, #14, #46, and #100) of the 33 residents sampled, including but not limited to, going out of doors in the fresh air when weather permitted and making periodic shopping trips for those who would enjoy them. Findings included: During a meeting of the Resident council on 01/30/20 at 10:00 AM, Resident #69 stated that the facility did not take residents outside for fresh air; he stated that unless they are able to get themselves out there on their own or have a visitor who takes them outside, then they don´t go outside. Resident #14 stated that the staff told her that they don´t have any way to transport them to a shopping location. Resident #46 stated that she was able to go outside, but that she cannot get to the store on her own. Resident #100 stated that the staff had not offered her any opportunities for any organized outings. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) records for Residents #14, 46, 69 and 100 revealed that each of them specified that when asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-31 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure assistive services were provided in a timely manner for one (#18) of thirty-three residents related to concerns with hearing. Findings included: Review of Resident #18's clinical record included an admission date of 8/28/2018. Pertinent medical diagnoses revealed dysphagia following cerebral infraction and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #18's care plan dated 8/09/2019 revealed a focus of communication problem related to Hearing deficit with interventions that included but was not limited to: Anticipate and meet needs and refer to Audiology for hearing consult as ordered. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating a resident with only slight cognitive impairment. The resident was documented as having a moderate hearing difficulty with no use of hearing aid or other hearing appliance. On 01/29/20 at 10:00 am an interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services to promote wound healing for one (Resident #54) of three sampled residents for wound care. Findings included: Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of acute hematogenous osteomyelitis right femur and type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer. A review of the medical record indicated Resident #54 had a treatment order with a start date of 1/30/20 for Dakins (1/4 strength) solution 0.125%. Directions: Apply to right hip, coccyx topically every shift for wound until 02/06/2020 23:59. Cleanse right hip and coccyx with normal saline solution. Apply moistened Dakin's gauze to wound bed. Cover with silver alginate gauze and bordered foam dressing. A review of the comprehensive care plan for Resident #54 revealed a focus area as follows: Focus: Resident #54 has pressure injury and potential for pressure injury development related to immobility. Goal: Pressure injury will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-31 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the medication error rate was below 5% for one (#10) of 5 sampled residents who were administered medications. This resulted in 5 errors from 26 medication administration opportunities, for a medication error rate of 19.23%. Findings Included: During medication administration on 1/30/20 at 9:35 a.m. with Staff Member J, RN, she prepared Resident #10's medication: Staff Member J, RN, observed the computer screen and removed one 400 mg tablet of guaifenesin from the over the counter medications and placed it in the medicine cup. One tablet of Depakote delayed release 125 mg's and placed in the medicine cup. One tablet of Amlodipine 10 mg tablet and placed in the medicine cup. Staff Member J, RN, stated she was finished with the pills for Resident #10. During review of the eye drops, she observed aspirin chewable 81 mg tablet was due and removed one from the drawer and placed that in the medicine cup. Staff Member J, RN, confirmed she had 4 pills in the medicine cup and poured them into a bag, crushed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain drugs and biologicals used in the facility in a safe and secure manner in one (ground floor) of two medication storage rooms and one (C) of six medication carts. Finding included: On 01/28/2020 at 7:15 a.m., an observation of the ground floor medication storage room was conducted with Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN). Staff C, RN, was asked to open the medication storage room for inspection. Upon entry to the medication storage room, the refrigerator was found to be unlocked. A metal box was observed inside of the refrigerator that was not permanently affixed. The metal box was removed from the refrigerator and Staff C, RN, was asked to open the metal box. Inside of the metal box were six vials of Ativan 2mg/ml (a schedule IV controlled medication) in a plastic bag. An interview was conducted with Staff C, RN, at the time of the observation. Staff C, RN, stated that the refrigerator is never locked and the Ativan is kept in the refrigerator for emergency use. (Photographic evidence was obtained.) On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-31 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain and ensure timeliness of laboratory results for one (#68) of 3 residents sampled related to stool samples for Clostridium Difficile on 4 different days. Findings Included: During observation of Resident #68's medication administration with Staff Member I, RN, on 1/30/20 at 9:02 a.m. revealed the resident turned to her right side with white bed sheets observed up to her chest. Resident #68 turned back toward Staff Member I, RN, and looked at her as brown, watery, odorous stool oozed through the white sheets. Resident #68 used her left hand to pull the sheet away from her by placing her left hand in the watery stool and lifting the white sheet. Staff Member I, RN, observed the resident moving the sheets, and walked back to the door and asked the CNA in the hall to get the resident changed. Staff Member I, RN, walked back in the room and placed her personal blood pressure cuff on Resident #68's left arm and sat the resident up in bed to finish giving her medications. Resident #68's sheets were observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-31 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain all kitchen equipment in a safe operating condition, related to 3 of 6 (top middle, top right, and bottom middle) burners on the stove. Findings included: Observations of the main kitchen during the comprehensive tour of the kitchen on 1/30/20 at 1:45 pm revealed that the main kitchen houses a 6-burner stove. Close observation of the stove revealed the top middle, top right burner and bottom middle burner did not have pilot lights lit. On 01/30/20 at 2:00 pm, an observation was made of Pilot lights for the six-burner stove in the kitchen. At such time the top middle and top right stove burners were not operable, and the bottom middle burner did not light upon turning of stovetop knobs. Kitchen staff obtained a handheld lighter from close by to light burner. Staff stated the burners in the back are not used when cooking. On 01/30/20 at 02:10 pm, an interview with the Dietary Technician and Dietician revealed there was no knowledge of the pilot lights being operable. The Dietary Technician The Assisted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$7,456 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $3,728 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
- $3,728 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVIATA HEALTH GROUP — 50 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
The other 49 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 49; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| 702 S KINGS AVE OPCO PARENT LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2023 |
| 702 S KINGS AVE OPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2023 |
| FREUND, NOCHUM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2023 |
| OLIVER, DESTENY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2023 |
| VEVE, VANESSA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2024 |
| DAGAN, AMITAI | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/20/2025 |
| GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/20/2025 |
| GOLDBERGER, FAIGY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/03/2025 |
| HERSKOWITZ, ELIEZER | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/03/2025 |
| HERSKOWITZ, YAAKOV | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/03/2025 |
| TRAVITSKY, AARON | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/03/2025 |
| ASPIRE MGT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $282K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105718. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-01-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.