Aviata At Grand Oaks

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 182 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 156 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 108.9 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-05-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, review of facility and resident records, and a review of the manufacturer's instructions for Resident #1's rolling walker, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #1 received adequate supervision and sufficient safeguards to prevent an avoidable accident. Staff failed to understand the proper use of the resident's rollator which resulted in Resident #1, one of seven residents reviewed for accidents, falling backwards and striking his head on the cement sidewalk. This failure resulted in a traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage requiring three days of monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) at an acute care hospital.On 04/06/2026 at approximately 10:35 AM while on a group nature walk/resident outing, Resident #1 was walking on the sidewalk using his four-wheeled walker (FWW)/rollator with oversight/assistance from the Social Services Director (SSD). Resident #1 became tired and sat down on the seat of his walker. The SSD began pushing him down the sidewalk toward the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of resident records, facility reports, staff interviews, and the facility's policies and procedures titled Advance Directives and Florida Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), the facility failed to act in accordance with the resident's Advance Directives and his Full Code status (the desire to be resuscitated in the event of cardiac/respiratory arrest) after finding him unresponsive with no respirations. This affected one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for Advance Directives. The facility's failure to honor Resident #1's Advance Directives deprived him of potentially lifesaving measures. Resident #1 was not revived and expired in the facility. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at a scope of J (isolated) was identified at 1:34 p.m. on [DATE]. On [DATE], at 7:35 a.m., Immediate Jeopardy began. On [DATE], at 5:30 p.m., the Interim Administrator/Associate Regional [NAME] President of Operations (ARVPO) was notified of the IJ determination, IJ templates were provided, and Immediate Jeopardy was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-07 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of resident records, facility reports, staff interviews, and the facility's policy and procedure titled Florida Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), the facility failed to provide CPR for one resident who was a Full Code status (the desire to be resuscitated in the event of cardiac/respiratory arrest) after finding him unresponsive with no respirations. This affected one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for Advance Directives. The facility's failure to provide CPR according to Resident #1's Advance Directives deprived him of potentially lifesaving measures. Resident #1 was not revived and expired in the facility. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at a scope of J (isolated) was identified at 1:34 p.m. on [DATE]. On [DATE], at 7:35 a.m., Immediate Jeopardy began. On [DATE], at 5:30 p.m., the Interim Administrator/Associate Regional [NAME] President of Operations (ARVPO) was notified of the IJ determination, IJ templates were provided, and Immediate Jeopardy was removed, effective [DATE]. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and a review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive water management program for the purpose of reducing the risk of growth and spread of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens in the facility's water system for its current census of 103 residents. Residents of nursing homes who may suffer from a weakened immune system, chronic lung disease, or other underlying medical conditions such as immunosuppression, are at risk for Legionnaires' Disease (type of pneumonia) if exposed to Legionella bacteria. Facilities must be able to demonstrate their measures to minimize the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens in building water systems such as by having a documented water management program that must be based on nationally accepted standards. The program must include an assessment to identify where Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens could grow and spread; measures to prevent the growth of opportunistic waterborne pathogens (control measures), and how to monitor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and a review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that residents with mental disorders were appropriately assessed on admission or as needed to determine the need for specialized services for four (Residents #21, #32, #89, and #42) of five residents reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR). The findings include: 1. A review of the medical record revealed that Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder and depression. A review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/1/25, revealed that active psychiatric disorders were noted as depression and bipolar disorder. A review of the Level I PASRR dated 3/1/22, revealed that Section #1 was not completed to indicate the resident's diagnoses. (Copy obtained) 2. A review of the medical record revealed that Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0924 — pattern
  Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to equip corridors with firmly secured and intact handrails. The facility staff failed to report/service the handrails outside of resident rooms #205 and #511, handrails next to the clean utility linen closet located on the 200 hallways, and handrails located around the 400 hallways' nursing station. Handrails in these locations were observed with jagged ends and sharp edges, posing a risk of injury to residents, staff and other building occupants. Daily facility rounds are important to ensure handrails are firmly secured and in good condition to prevent resident injury. The findings include: On 02/05/2024 at 1:10 PM, an observation was made of the handrails located outside of rooms #205 and #511, which were missing end caps. (Photographic evidence obtained) An interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) J on 02/07/2024 at 1:05 PM. He stated residents usually reported maintenance requests to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the facility's Maintenance policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure maintenance was provided to maintain a safe, clean, and comfortable environment for two (Rooms #502 and #508) of 70 rooms in the facility. The air conditioners' electrical covers were broken, and parts of the covers were missing and had become detached from the units in these two rooms. The findings include: A facility tour was conducted on 2/6/24 at 11:00 a.m., and two air conditioning units were observed in need of repair in rooms #502 and #508. The electrical covers for the air conditioners were broken with parts of the covers missing and detached from the units. The units were observed daily on 2/7/24 and 2/8/24. (Photographic evidence obtained) A tour and interview were conducted with the Maintenance Director on 2/8/24 at 12:07 p.m. He reported being unaware of the concerns with the two air conditioning units in rooms #502 and #508. He confirmed that the electrical covers were not attached securely, parts were missing and parts of the covers…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0638 — isolated
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to assess a resident using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) not less frequently than once every three months for three (Residents #11, #68, and #226) of three residents reviewed, from 34 residents in the total sample. Failure to complete resident minimum data set (MDS) assessments could result in a failure to provide needed care, contributing to residents' inability to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings include: A review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed that the required quarterly assessment, due by 12/10/2023, was not documented as having been completed. A review of the medical record for Resident #68 revealed that the required quarterly assessment, due by 12/7/2023, was not documented as having been completed. A review of the medical record for Resident #226 revealed that the required quarterly assessment, due by 12/10/2023, was not documented as having…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, interviews, and a review of the facility's Oxygen Therapy policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered at the physician-ordered flow rate for one (Resident #54) of one resident reviewed for oxygen therapy from a total of 34 residents in the sample. The findings include: An observation and interview was conducted with Resident #54 in her room on 2/5/24 at 11:00 a.m. She reported that her oxygen flow rate was set at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula. The oxygen flow rate was observed to be set at 2.5 liters per minute. A review of the resident's medical record revealed a re-entry to the facility on 1/5/24 with diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure, emphysema, congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation. The resident's active physician's orders were reviewed which noted: Respiratory: oxygen at 2 liters via nasal cannula continuous. The care plan was reviewed, which was updated on 1/25/24. Resident has oxygen therapy related to respiratory illness and receives oxygen via nasal prongs at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, medical record review, and a review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to maintain and implement its infection control program to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, when three employees (Employees C, E, and F) were observed failing to use personal protective equipment (PPE) in transmission base precaution (TBP)/isolation rooms. Supplies for hand hygiene were not provided in the soiled utility room, PPE was not readily available and convenient to the staff for use in TBP rooms, and employees failed to perform hand hygiene when leaving a TBP room. Failure to follow infection control protocols and procedures could leave vulnerable nursing home residents at risk of contracting infections that could be detrimental to their health. The findings include: On 02/05/2024 at 10:25 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C was observed donning PPE appropriately. He then entered room [ROOM NUMBER] to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-03-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, by failing to 1) Ensure wet nesting did not occur, 2) Maintain safe food temperatures, 3) Label and date food items in the [NAME] Wing nourishment room refrigerator/freezer, 4) Dispose of outdated and unlabeled/undated foods items properly, 5) Maintain thermometers in the East and [NAME] Wing nourishment room freezers, 6) Ensure hot water was available in the kitchen handwashing sinks, and 7) Ensure the kitchen trashcan pedal, which opened the trashcan lid, was functional. These failures had the potential to negatively impact all residents who received food from the facility kitchen and nourishment rooms. The findings include: An observation of the kitchen was made on 2/27/2022 at 3:25 p.m. Neither of the two hand washing stations had hot water. The trash can foot pedal was not working at the hand washing station nearest to the kitchen entrance. At 3:45 p.m., a dietary aide was observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations during four of four days, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for eleven (Residents #14, #65, #57, #100, #30, #1, #7, #27, #32, #45, and #252) of 46 residents in the sample. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain housekeeping and maintenance services in resident rooms and common areas. The findings include: On 2/27/22 at 12:20 p.m., Resident #1's bathroom was observed with a soap dispenser bag lying on the toilet tank. Grab bars were discolored, the floor was soiled, and the air conditioning vent was covered in grey debris. (Photographic evidence obtained) On 2/27/22 at 12:24 p.m., Resident #7's bathroom was observed with a toilet that was soiled above the water line. (Photographic evidence obtained) On 2/27/22 at 12:40 p.m., Resident #100's bathroom was observed with a vent covered in grey, thickened debris. The drain cover under the sink was broken. Grab bars had a rusted appearance, and the sink faucet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-03-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to treat one (Resident #1) of 46 sampled residents with respect and dignity in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, by failing to ensure the resident's urinary drainage bag was covered for privacy. The findings include: On 2/27/22 at 12:20 p.m., Resident #1 was observed awake and lying in bed. A urinary catheter bag was observed on the right side of her bed facing the door. The catheter bag was not covered with a privacy/dignity bag and urine was visible in the bag from the hallway. On 2/27/22 at 2:07 p.m., Resident #1 was observed in her room from the hallway. Her door was open and her urinary catheter bag was hanging from the right side of her bed. It was not covered with a privacy/dignity bag. On 2/28/22 at 9:15 a.m., Resident #1 was observed lying in bed. Her urinary catheter bag was not covered with a privacy/dignity bag. Urine was visible in the bag. On 3/1/22 at 8:22 a.m., Resident #1 was observed lying in bed. Her door was open…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,646 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $7,823 — penalty dated 2024-06-07
• $7,823 — penalty dated 2024-06-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIATA HEALTH GROUP — 50 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $191K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL