Aviata At Lakeside Oaks

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 44.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 93 beds and averages 79.5 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-10-21 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility did not ensure the care plan was updated and individualized interventions were in place after a reportable adverse event, that resulted in re-traumatization, for one resident (#1) out of one resident reviewed.Findings included: On 10/21/25 at 10:58 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #1. She said an event occurred at the facility on 9/4/25. She said she had a bowel movement and relied on the staff to change her. She said around 5:00 or 6:00 p.m., on 9/4/25, she requested a female staff to assist with changing her. Resident #1 said she was told by a male staff the female staff member was busy, and she could wait until about 7:30 p.m. She said she was not comfortable with a male staff member changing her. Resident #1 said her response was she was not waiting for two hours to be changed. She said Staff I, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was the only person available to assisting with changing her soiled brief. She said she ambulated in the wheelchair to her room and waited. Resident #1 said Staff I, CNA came…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-10-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure two allegations of abuse were investigated thoroughly for two residents (#1 and #2) out of four residents with reportable incidents reviewed.Findings included: 1.) On 10/21/25 at 10:58 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #1. She said an event occurred at the facility on 9/4/25. She said she had a bowel movement and relied on the staff to change her. She said around 5:00 or 6:00 p.m., on 9/4/25, she requested a female staff to assist with changing her. Resident #1 said she was told by a male staff the female staff member was busy, and she could wait until about 7:30 p.m. She said she was not comfortable with a male staff member changing her. Resident #1 said her response was she was not waiting for two hours to be changed. She said Staff I, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was the only person available to assisting with changing her soiled brief. She said she ambulated in the wheelchair to her room and waited. Resident #1 said Staff I, CNA came in and assisted her into bed. She said she rolled to the side…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure the grievance process was followed by failing to document a grievance for one resident (#4) out of three residents reviewed. Findings included: Review of Resident #4's admission record revealed an admission date of 10/29/24 with diagnoses to include type 2 diabetes, muscle weakness, seizures, paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, brief psychotic disorder, and anxiety disorder. A review of Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], section C revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 13, meaning cognitively intact. A review of a statement completed by Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) on 9/7/25 with Resident #4, related to a reportable incident, revealed the resident expressed they do not always feel safe or comfortable at the facility due to Certified Nursing Assisting (CNA) staff mishandling and being rough with her. A review of the facility's grievance log revealed there was no grievance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-28 · tag F0627 — pattern
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe and orderly discharge for one residents (#1) and failed to follow up post discharge for two residents (#1 and #10) out of three residents sampled.Findings included:1. Review of Resident #1's admission record showed he was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 6/20/25 to Private home/apt.(apartment) with no home health services: Home. Resident #1's medical diagnoses including the following: Stage 3 pressure ulcer of sacral region, paraplegia, chronic pain and osteomyelitis of the spine. Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 6/20/25 revealed Resident to discharge 6/20/25, DME [durable medical equipment]: 18 in (inch) W/C (wheelchair) with leg rests; shower chair, bedside commode; hospital bed; slide board; recliner chair; large briefs; wound care; physical therapy/ occupational therapy eval (evaluation) and treat (treatment).Review of Resident #1's physician order summary report, showed orders including:An order dated 6/19/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate records of controlled substances and ensure narcotics were reconciled as required for three residents (#2, #3, and #4) out of three sampled residents.Findings included:On 8/27/2025 at 10:03 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #3. Over a week ago the resident did not receive the prescribed oxycodone 10 mg during an evening shift. The resident stated the pain medication was due at 6:00 p.m. Staff U, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was asked several times to administer the medication. The resident did not receive the medication until the next shift. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and the Medication Monitoring/Control Record, the Narc log, revealed administrations were present in the Narc log but the corresponding administrations were not documented in the MAR. The following findings detail the volume of administration not documented in the MAR:Review of the Medication Administration Record dated 7/1/2025 through 7/31/2025, revealed Resident #3's MAR was missing nine out of 56…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure treatment and care were provided after an upper extremity fracture in accordance with professional standards of practice for one resident (#2) of three sampled residents.Findings included:On 8/27/25 at 10:05 a.m., Resident #2 was observed sitting up in bed wearing a hospital gown. Resident #2's left arm was observed to be without movement and laid straight at his side. He was not wearing a left arm sling. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed he was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of right middle cerebral artery; muscle weakness (generalized); spastic hemiplegia affecting left nondominant side; other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness; aphasia following cerebral infarction; other schizoaffective disorders and was updated to include unspecified fracture of upper end of left humerus on 7/23/25.Review of Resident #2's medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF-ABN) was issued to 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. (Resident #136) The findings include: A review of Resident #136's record revealed a Medicare Part A Skilled Services start date of 11/23/23, with the last covered day of Part A services listed as 12/13/23. The record did not contain the required SNF-ABN form. An interview was conducted with the Social Services Director on 1/24/24 at 12:01 PM. He stated the facility did not issue a SNF-ABN to Resident #136 because he was not aware of the requirement. A review of the facility policy SNF Advance Beneficiary Notification (ABN) & Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (BO-510 revised 5/1/18) revealed that the Care Center is responsible for delivering the Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage and the SNF ABN to all beneficiaries not later than 2 days, before their covered services end and for delivering the Detailed Notice to the Quality…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to obtain and/or act upon pharmacy recommendations in July and December 2023 for 4 of 5 sampled residents. (Residents #26, #46, #60, #70) The findings included: Resident #26 On 1/25/24, a review of a Consultant Pharmacist Medication Regimen Review to Psychiatry dated 12/18/23 for Resident #26 was conducted. The review stated, .the resident is due for a gradual dose reduction in an attempt to find the lowest effective dose. If the medication cannot be reduced at this time please check the appropriate rationale below related to the gradual dose reduction being clinically contraindicated at this time and make a brief clinical rational note that the benefits outweigh the risks. The form was not completed or signed by a medical practitioner or psychiatrist at the time of the survey. A review of the order summary report dated 1/24/24 for Resident #26 was conducted. Resident #26 had a diagnosis of Schizoaffective disorder and Alzheimer's Disease. The resident had an order dated 8/8/23 to take Seroquel (an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-12-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#15) of thirty-two sampled residents received services to maintain or promote further range of motion for a contracture related to not applying a hand splint for three (12/20/2021, 12/21/2021, and 12/22/2021) of three days. Findings included: On 12/20/2021 at 2:12 p.m. Resident #15 was observed in his room, lying in bed. Resident #15 was interviewable but had verbal difficulties. Further observation revealed Resident#15's right hand appeared contracted and was placed/positioned on his stomach area. Resident #15 was not wearing a hand splint on his right hand during the observation. However, a blue and black splint was observed placed on the left side of the bed on a dresser, out from his reach. On 12/21/2021 at 12:10 p.m. Resident #15 was observed lying in bed and under the covers. Resident #15 was noted not wearing a right-hand splint and it was observed positioned on the left side of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-12-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  F812 Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety related to male staff members not wearing hair restraints to cover beards, expired and undated food in the walk-in cooler, and black build up and condensation leaking from vents above the serving line and food prep table in one of one kitchen, and undated food and spillage in the nourishment refrigerator on one wing (East), and an uncovered ice scoop stored in one nourishment room on one wing (West) out of a total of two nourishment rooms. Findings included: On 12/20/21 at 9:04 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) was observed wearing a surgical mask and no beard guard to cover facial hair. Facial hair was exposed at the bottom of the surgical mask and on both sides of the mask. Two containers of Fresh Salsa were observed in the walk-in cooler with an expiration date of 08/26/21 and 09/05/21 (photographic evidence obtained). A peanut butter and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-12-22 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that its Quality Assurance plan was effective related to 1. Failure to prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety related to a staff member not wearing hair restraints, condensation leaking from vents above the serving line and food prep table in one of one kitchen, and an uncovered ice scoop stored in one of two nourishment rooms (West Wing); and 2. Failure to provide one (Resident #4) of four sampled residents with timely narcotic pain medication related to not submitting a prescribed narcotic prescription to the pharmacy timely. Findings included: 1. The facility developed a plan of correction that included the following: - On 12/21/21, the Dietary manager completed a kitchen sanitation and food storage audit in the kitchen. On 12/20/21, the Dietary manager completed a sanitation and food storage in the facilities nutrition rooms. Any concerns identified were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

$8,788 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,788 — penalty dated 2025-08-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIATA HEALTH GROUP — 50 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $188K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL