Aviata At North Fort Myers

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 97 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 110 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 111.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.58 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-05-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care according to industry standards by not following physician's orders for quarterly lab draws for 1 (Resident #31) of 1 resident reviewed for seizures. Not following physician's orders for quarterly lab values puts a resident with seizure disorder at risk of seizures and hospitalization by not ensuring therapeutic levels of the seizure medication are within the bloodstream. The findings included: On 5/1/22 at 10:06 a.m., Resident #31 was observed lying in bed in her room. The resident did not respond to verbal stimulation, stared straight ahead, making unintelligible noises, like whimpering. Review of the Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated Resident #31 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The active diagnosis for Resident #31 included unspecified convulsions, seizure disorder, and anoxic brain injury. Resident #31 was originally admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview with the Dietary Manager, the facility failed to store food in an appropriate manner in accordance with guidelines of the FDA (Food and Drugs Administration) Food Code to ensure food was stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. The findings included:The facility policy and procedure titled, Food Storage: Cold Foods, revised 4/2018, policy #019's Policy Statement stated, All Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) foods, frozen and refrigerated, will be appropriately stored in accordance with guidelines of the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) Food Code. Procedures . All food will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination . References : https://www.fda.gov/downloads/food/guidanceregualtions/retailfoodprotection/foodcode/ucm374510.pdf. The undated dietary department policy titled, Labeling and Dating Inservice noted, . Importance of Labeling and Dating. Proper labeling and dating ensures that all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record of 1 (Resident #11) of 2 residents reviewed for accurate documentation was completely and accurately documented. The findings included: Review of the clinical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 10/31/22.Diagnoses included: Acute gastric ulcer with hemorrhage; Traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness (head injury); Mild protein-calorie malnutrition; Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing); Epilepsy; Cerebrovascular disease (disease of the blood vessels in the brain).Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11scored 14 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating intact cognition. The MDS noted that Resident #11 required setup or clean-up assistance for eating.Review of the care plan completed on 2/19/26 revealed that Resident #11was at risk for malnutrition related to prior medical history of anxiety disorder, major depressive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were implemented for 1 (Resident #53) of 3 residents reviewed who sustained multiple falls at the facility.The findings included:Review of the clinical record of Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 1/26/26. Diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Systemic Lupus, unspecified displaced fracture of surgical neck of left humerus, syncope (fainting) and collapse.Review of the 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment with an assessment reference date of 2/5/26 revealed that Resident #53's cognition was severely impaired. The resident required substantial/maximal assist with toileting, bathing and transfers; partial/moderate assistance with dressing, sit to stand, and bed mobility.A Change in Condition progress note dated 1/27/26 revealed Resident #53 resident had a fall. Nursing staff assisted the resident in getting back to bed. Education provided on fall prevention measures. Resident to call for assistance before getting out of bed/chair when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication with the dialysis center related to the ongoing assessment of a dialysis resident before and after each dialysis treatment for 1 (Resident #128) of 1 resident receiving dialysis.The findings included:The facility's policy Coordination of Hemodialysis Services #N1359 with a revision date of 07/02/2019 stated residents which have required an outside ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease) facility will have services coordinated by the facility. There would be communication between the facility and the ESRD facility regarding the residents. A dialysis communication form would be initiated by the facility for any resident going to an ESRD center for hemodialysis. Nursing would collect and complete the information regarding the resident to send to the ESRD center . Upon the resident's return to the facility, nursing will review the dialysis communication form and information completed by the dialysis center or the information sent by the dialysis center. Nursing will complete the post dialysis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0730 — isolated
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to have documentation of a performance review and in-service education based on the outcome of the review for 1 (Staff E) of 4 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) reviewed.The findings included:On 4/8/26, review of CNA Staff E's employee file revealed a date of hire of 9/11/24. The employee file lacked documentation of an annual performance evaluation for the year 2025.On 4/8/26 at 2:18 p.m., the Human Resources Director reviewed CNA Staff E's employee file and confirmed in an interview that no annual performance evaluation had been completed since CNA Staff E's original hire date.On 4/9/26 at 8:03 a.m., in an interview, the Nursing Home Administrator verified that CNA Staff E had been employed at the facility since 9/11/24. She said they were unable to find an annual performance evaluation for CNA Staff E.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have documentation of dementia management training for 2 (Staff E and Staff D) of 4 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) reviewed.The findings included:Review of the CNA Staff E's employee file revealed the Dementia Care: Effective Communication training assigned to the CNA on 9/11/24 had a status of not started.No other annual dementia training was in the employee records.Review of CNA Staff D's employee file revealed the Dementia Care: Effective Communication training was assigned to the CNA on 9/1/23 and had a status of not started. No other annual dementia training was in the employee records.On 4/8/26 at 1:04 p.m., in an interview, the Human Resources Director said that the education transcripts of CNAs Staff D and Staff E did not include dementia training. She verified that CNAs Staff D and Staff E never completed the Dementia Care: Effective Communication training that were assigned to them respectively on 9/1/23 and 9/11/24.On 4/8/26 at 2:20 p.m., in an interview, the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-10-22 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, residents, staff and contractor's interview, the facility failed to have an effective pest control program to ensure a pest free environment in residents' rooms and in the kitchen of the food serving establishment.The findings included:On 10/20/25 at 9:05 a.m., during a tour of the [NAME] Unit, a live brown insect was observed crawling on the bathroom floor of room [ROOM NUMBER].On 10/20/25 at 9:49 a.m., in an interview Resident #6 said she's had ants crawling in her bed.On 10/21/25 at 3:50 a.m., in an interview Registered Nurse (RN) Staff BB said ants were an issue at the facility. During the interview, multiple ants were observed crawling on the wall at the nurse's station next to the [NAME] Unit.On 10/21/25 at 4:00 a.m., during a tour of the [NAME] Unit the following observations were made:Live crawling insects in the hallway and in room [ROOM NUMBER].Numerous ants were crawling on the clean linen in the linen cart.During confidential interviews, direct care staff who…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, residents and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide housekeeping, and maintenance services to maintain a clean, comfortable and pest free environment in all 3 ([NAME], [NAME] and [NAME]) of 4 units observed. The facility failed to maintain the walk-in refrigerator and freezer in a clean and sanitary mannerThe findings included:1. On 10/20/25 at 9:05 a.m., a tour of the [NAME] unit revealed the following: room [ROOM NUMBER]: Unlabeled, uncovered wash basins were stacked and stored on the toilet tank of the shared bathroom. Photographic evidence obtained. A live brown insect was observed crawling on the bathroom floor. Photographic evidence obtained. The raised toilet seat was rusty. Photographic evidence obtained. The bed remote of room [ROOM NUMBER] B was coated with a sticky brown substance. The bed control was not functioning properly. The head of the bed could not be raised. room [ROOM NUMBER]: An extension cord was observed plugged to the wall next to the bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, review of facility's policies and procedures, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #2) of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis received care and services to meet her needs. The findings included: The facility's policy and procedure Coordination of Hemodialysis Services with a revision date of 07/02/2019 noted, Residents requiring an outside ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease) facility will have services coordinated by the facility. There will be communication between the facility and the ESRD facility regarding the resident . Procedure: The Dialysis Communication form will be initiated by the facility for any resident going to an ESRD center for hemodialysis. Nursing will collect and complete the information regarding the resident to send to the ESRD Center. The ESRD facility is to review the Dialysis Communication form and either : a. Complete the communication form and return with the resident or b. Provide treatment information to the facility. Upon the resident's return to the facility, nursing will review the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, review of facility's policies and procedures, and staff interviews, the facility failed to report a resident's injury of unknown origin to the Agency for Health Care Administration within the required time for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 residents' incidents reviewed. The findings included: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation & Misappropriation with a revision date of 11/16/2022 noted under reporting/response, Any employee or contracted service provider who witnesses or has knowledge of an act of abuse or an allegation of abuse, neglect . including injuries of unknown source . to a resident, is obligated to report such information immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury . to the Administrator and to other officials in accordance with State law . Once the allegation of abuse is reported, the Executive Director, as the abuse coordinator, is responsible for ensuring that reporting is completed timely and appropriately to appropriate officials in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,120 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $6,152 — penalty dated 2024-11-14
• $4,823 — penalty dated 2024-03-13
• $3,145 — penalty dated 2023-12-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIATA HEALTH GROUP — 50 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $81K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL