Aviata At Santa Barbara

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 127 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 115.6 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-04-16 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility's policy and procedure and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide immediate and appropriate basic life support to 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed with full code status (Administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest).On [DATE] at approximately 2:07 a.m., the clinical staff consisting of one Registered Nurse (RN) and one Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) administered Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to Resident #1 when he was found without a pulse or respirations. The Licensed Nurses did not activate Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and discontinued CPR after approximately 20 minutes. The RN pronounced the resident's death without the required credentials. Clinical staff re-started CPR 4 hours later at the direction of the Director of Nursing and called EMS. Resident #1 was pronounced deceased by EMS.The facility failure to immediately activate EMS and administer CPR to Resident #1 until the arrival of EMS placed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policies and procedures, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure clinical staff had the competencies to respond appropriately to emergencies and ensure 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed with full code status (Administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest) received timely life saving measures when found without pulse or respirations.Resident #1 had a full code status. On [DATE], Resident #1 was found in cardiac and respiratory arrest. Clinical staff administered cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for 20 minutes then pronounced the resident's death without authority to do so and without activating Emergency Medical Services (EMS). Clinical Staff re-started CPR and activated EMS 4 hours after CPR was stopped and the resident had no pulse and respirations.The facility failure to ensure nursing staff were trained and competent to respond appropriately to cardiac and respiratory arrests placed other residents with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespread
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, review of facility's policies and procedures, residents and staff interviews the facility failed to have processes in place to prevent avoidable accidents for 6 (Residents #3, #103, #59, #74, #5, #95) of 6 residents by failure to accurately assess smoking risks, failure to identify unsafe storage and use of ignition devices where oxygen is in use and failure to adequately supervise residents who smoke tobacco products and electronic cigarettes. Residents #3 and #103 were roommates. Resident #3 was a smoker and Resident #103 received supplemental oxygen. On 8/27/25 Residents #3 and #103 were observed in their shared bedroom. Resident #3 was holding a cigarette and a lighter approximately 4 feet from Resident #103 who was receiving oxygen. On 8/27/25 a CNA was observed leaving cigarettes and lighters unlocked, unattended and easily accessible to 4 residents observed in the designated smoking area. Residents #59 and #74 were roommates and smokers. Resident #59 received supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula. On 8/27/25 Residents #74 and #59 were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, review of facility's policies and procedures, residents and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses had the appropriate training and competencies to complete accurate smoking risk evaluations and identify unsafe smoking practices. The smoking risk evaluations for 7 (Residents #59, #105, #3, #74, #64, #5, #95) of 7 residents reviewed contained conflicting, inaccurate information and did not accurately reflect the residents' abilities to smoke independently. Each smoking evaluation noted the resident was a safe smoker and needs constant supervision.4 (Residents #3, #5, #59, and #74) of 4 residents observed with oxygen in use in their rooms were allowed to store ignition devices in their rooms while oxygen was in use.On 8/27/25 a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was observed leaving cigarettes and lighters unlocked, unattended and easily accessible to 4 residents observed in the designated smoking area.Staff assigned to monitor residents who require constant supervision during smoking had not received appropriate training…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · L2025-08-29 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, residents and staff interviews, the facility administration failed to utilize its resources effectively to provide effective oversight and enforcement of safe smoking practices. The smoking evaluations for 5 (Residents #59, #3, #74, #64 and #5) of 6 residents reviewed contained conflicting and inaccurate smoking risks. The evaluations noted the residents were safe smokers and required constant supervision for smoking. The licensed nurses who completed the smoking evaluations had no documentation of training or competencies to ensure the smoking evaluations were complete and accurately reflected each resident's smoking risks.Residents #3, and #59 were smokers and used supplemental oxygen in their rooms. Resident #5 used oxygen and vaped electronic cigarettes in her room. The residents retained and stored ignition devices (lighters or electronic cigarettes) in their rooms while oxygen was in use. The management staff responsible to enforce safe smoking practices had not received training and did not consistently complete the observation of assigned…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · L2025-08-29 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — widespread
  Have policies on smoking.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, review of facility's policies and procedures, residents and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement and enforce the facility's supervised smoking policy to ensure accurate residents' smoking evaluations and prohibiting the use and storage of ignition devices around oxygen use in residents' rooms for 6 (Residents #3, #103, #59, #74, #5, and #95) of 6 residents reviewed for safe smoking.Residents #3 and #103 were roommates. Resident #3 was a smoker and Resident #103 received supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula.On 8/27/25 Residents #3 and #103 were observed in their shared bedroom. Resident #3 was holding a cigarette and lighter approximately 4 feet from Resident #103 who was in bed receiving supplemental oxygen.Residents #59 and #74 were roommates and smokers. Resident #59 received supplemental oxygen. Both residents required constant supervision while smoking. On 8/27/25 Resident #59 was receiving oxygen. A lighter was stored within 2 feet of the oxygen source and on the windowsill of the shared bedroom.Resident #5 received…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility's policies and procedures, resident representative and staff interviews, the facility failed to allow the return to the facility post hospitalization for 1 (Resident #2) of 7 residents reviewed for discharge planning process.Resident #2 was discharged to a different nursing home approximately 73 miles from his family.The findings included:Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Transfer/Discharge Notification & Right to Appeal with a revision date of 04/28/25 revealed, Transfer and discharges of residents, initiated by the center (facility initiated) will be conducted according to Federal and/or State regulatory requirements. The center must permit each resident to remain in the center, and not transfer or discharge the resident unless:The transfer or discharge is necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs cannot be met in the center;The transfer or discharge is appropriate because the resident's health has improved sufficiently so the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, resident representative and staff interview the facility failed to have documentation of incontinent care to meet the needs of 1 (Resident #999) of 4 residents reviewed for toileting needs.The findings included:On 3/3/36 at 9:39 a.m., in a telephone interview, Resident #999's family representative said on 2/4/26 she came to visit the resident and found her in bed with the bedding soaked with urine and no incontinent brief or pad was in place. The representative said the resident had a very strong odor of urine.Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #999 had an admission date of 7/27/20 with most readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, traumatic brain injury, anxiety and major depressive disorder.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of1/16/26 documented Resident #999 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The MDS noted the resident's cognitive skills for daily decision making…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to prevent verbal abuse from staff for 2 of 3 residents reviewed. (Patient #1 and Patient #2)The findings included: Review of the facility Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation & Misappropriation policy (last revised on 11/16/2022) says that residents should be afforded basic human rights, including the right to be free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation and/or misappropriation of property. The policy further noted no employee may at any time commit an act of physical, psychological, or emotional abuse. The policy defines abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting in physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. The policy defines mental abuse as the use of verbal or nonverbal conduct which causes or has the potential to cause the resident to experience humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation or degradation. The policy defines verbal abuse as the use of oral,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff provided incontinence care in accordance with accepted standards of care to meet the needs of 1 (Resident #800) of 3 residents reviewed.The findings included:On 10/15/25 at 9:24 a.m., Resident #800 was observed in bed in her room. In an interview Resident #800 said staff put two incontinent briefs and a towel on her because she was a heavy wetter. With the resident's permission, the incontinent briefs were observed. Resident #800 was wearing two incontinent briefs. A folded towel was placed inside the briefs. Resident #800 said it took 2 to 3 staff to provide incontinent care and change her briefs. She said the other day Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Staff A came in to change her. She tried to explain to the CNA how they did her care and that it took 2 to 3 staff to change her. The resident said that CNA Staff A did not explain what she was going to do and did not listen to her. She reported the incident.Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #800 had an admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-08-29 · tag F0843 — widespread
  Have an agreement with at least one or more hospitals certified by Medicare or Medicaid to make sure residents can be moved quickly to the hospital when they need medical care.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have a written transfer agreement in effect with one or more hospitals approved for participation in Medicare/Medicaid programs. The findings included:On 8/29/25 a request was made to the facility to review the facility's transfer agreement with one or more hospitals approved for participation in the Medicare/Medicaid programs. On 8/29/25 at 12:15 p.m., in an interview the Regional [NAME] President of Operations said the facility did not have a transfer agreement with any hospital.On 8/29/25 at 1:30 p.m., in an interview the Administrator verified the facility did not have a transfer agreement with one or more hospitals approved for participation in the Medicare/Medicaid program.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, residents and staff interviews, the facility failed to act promptly upon the grievance expressed by the resident council group during their monthly meetings. The findings included:Review of the facility's Complaint/Grievance policy and procedure N-1042 dated 11/30/14 and revised 10/24/22 revealed that the center would support each resident's right to voice a complaint/grievance without fear of discrimination or reprisal. The center would make prompt efforts to resolve the complaint/grievance and inform the resident of progress towards resolution. An employee receiving a complaint/grievance from a resident, family and/or visitor would initiate a Complaint/Grievance Form. The original grievance form was then submitted to the Grievance Office/designee for further action. The Grievance Officer/designee would act on the grievance and begin follow-up of the concern or submit it to the appropriate department director for follow-up. The grievance follow-up should be completed in a reasonable time frame; this should not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding tubes for 3 (Residents #52, #15 and #94) of 4 residents reviewed.The findings included: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included but not limited to aphasia following cerebral infarction, neuropathy, and gastrostomy.Care Plan initiated 8/12/25, revision date 8/20/25 revealed Resident #52 is at risk for complications, infections, fluid balance, aspiration (accidental inhalation of food, liquid into the airways or lungs) related to Resident #52 requires tube feeding to meet hydration/nutrition needs secondary to cerebrovascular accident (stroke). Interventions include observe for signs and symptoms of infection, report promptly; provide local care to g-tube site as ordered and monitor for signs and symptoms of infection.Review of physician orders reveals Resident #52 does not have an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely acquiring and administering of medications to meet the needs of 3 (Residents #48, #51, and #18) of 3 residents selected for medication administration observation.The findings included:1. On [DATE] at 8:16 a.m., during a medication administration observation for Resident #48, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff M said Resident #48's Tenofovir Discoproxil Fumarate (hepatitis medication) was not available. She said the medication was ordered on [DATE] and had not arrived from the pharmacy yet. Review of Resident #48's Medication Administration Record for [DATE] revealed several days medications had not been documented as given including: [DATE]th and 25th which had blank boxes for Levothyroxine (thyroid medication), Naloxogol Oxalate (medication for constipation), Torsemide (diuretic medication). [DATE]th also had a blank box for Insulin Glargine (diabetic medication). No documentation was found explaining what the blank boxes meant or that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, review of the facility's policy and procedure, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 (Residents #65, and #51) of 5 residents reviewed for immunization received education regarding the benefits and potential side effects and were offered pneumococcal immunization.The facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #65) of 5 residents residing at the facility between October 1, 2024, and March 31, 2025, received education and was offered the influenza immunization.The findings included:Review of the Pneumococcal Vaccine Policy dated 2001, revised October 2019 revealed that all residents will be offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections. (1) Prior to or upon admission, residents will be assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series, and when indicated, will be offered the vaccine series within thirty days of admission to the facility unless medically contraindicated prior to admission. (2) Assessments of pneumococcal vaccination status will be conducted within five working days of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage issued to 2 (Residents #15 and #57) of 3 residents was complete and accurately reflect the residents' decision to stop or continue skilled services and the financial liability. The findings included:Review of the Facility policy titled Advanced Beneficiary Notice - ABN with a revision date of 11/10/2015 revealed, An ABN will be utilized to notify resident of the possibility that Medicare will not pay for the item(s) or service(s) that are described on the form . The form will be reviewed with the resident or authorized representative .Procedure 1. d. The resident or authorized representative is to choose one of the three options, date and sign the form. The resident must comprehend the contents. If the resident is unable to comprehend the contents of the notice, it must be delivered to and signed by an authorized representative . On 8/27/25 the Social Services Director (SSD) provided the Advance Beneficiary Notices of non-coverage that had been issued to current…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$111,543 in federal fines across 6 penalties.

• $88,166 — penalty dated 2025-08-06
• $4,336 — penalty dated 2025-02-27
• $4,336 — penalty dated 2025-02-27
• $4,336 — penalty dated 2025-02-27
• $4,337 — penalty dated 2025-02-27
• $6,032 — penalty dated 2024-07-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIATA HEALTH GROUP — 50 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $121K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL