Aviata At Oakfield

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 98 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 86 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 116.5 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect by not providing supervision for one resident (#1) out of four residents sampled for elopement. At approximately 12:15 p.m. on 12/20/23, Resident #1 was able to exit the facility through a door with a wander monitoring device alarm, walk into the facility lobby area, and speak with two facility staff members. One staff member held the door open for Resident #1 to enter the lobby, and the other staff member asked Resident #1 to sign out on the visitor log. Resident #1 signed the visitor log and exited out another door with a wander monitoring device alarm. Resident #1 walked approximately 0.2 miles down a heavily trafficked road, he crossed four lanes of traffic, and called his family member to pick him up. The facility staff were not aware Resident #1 was missing until Resident #1's family member called the facility inquiring if he was there. Resident #1 was absent for approximately 32…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent an unwitnessed exit from the facility for one resident (#1) out of four residents sampled for elopement. Resident #1 had diagnoses to include metabolic encephalopathy, altered mental status, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, and a history of falling. Resident #1 was assessed to be at high risk for elopement with a physician's order to have a wander monitoring device in place. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed Resident #1 did not have a wander monitoring device in place on 12/12/23, 12/13/23, 12/16/23, and 12/19/23. A wander monitoring device could not be located by nursing staff to place on Resident #1 and there was no evidence of an increase in supervision for Resident #1. At approximately 12:15 p.m. on 12/20/23, Resident #1 was able to exit the facility through a door with a wander monitoring device alarm, walk into the facility lobby area, and speak with two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident accessible water temperatures were maintained at safe and comfortable levels, not to exceed the required temperature of 105 - 115 degrees Fahrenheit (F) in two units (100,300) of three units, affecting three rooms (204, 315 and 113). Findings included: On 4/13/2026 at 9:10 a.m. during an initial tour of resident rooms revealed water flow temperatures too hot to hold the back of the hand under in the resident bathroom sinks in rooms [ROOM NUMBER].On 4/13/2026 at 11:00 a.m. during an interview with the Director of Maintenance (DOM), he stated he had been the DOM at the facility for four months and did not have an audit plan to include water temperature testing at individual resident room sinks. He stated he sets the facility's water heaters at a certain temperature and will read the flow temperature from that specific heater. The DOM stated the water heaters are set at around 110 - 115 degrees. He was not sure how many…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Forty-two medication administration opportunities were observed and 16 errors were identified for three resident (#6, 138 and 95) out of seven residents observed. These errors constituted a 38.1% medication error rate.Findings included: On 4/15/2026 at 8:26 a.m., during medication administration for Resident #95, an observation was made of Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN) who pulled the following medications: Ipratropium bromide and albuterol 0.5mg/3 ml (milligrams /milliliters ) and Budesonide 0.25mg/2 ml. Staff D, RN stated for Resident #95 she normally saves her for last because she has at times refused her medications and stated she had two nebulizer medications to give. Resident #95 was amiable for her medications. An observation was made of Staff D, RN opening both plastic tubes each containing the two separate nebulizer medications, pour the medications into the nebulizer vial, connect the vial containing both nebulizer medications to a face mask,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control policies and procedures were followed related to the use of PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) and Hand Hygiene (HH), for three residents (#16, #85 and #6) out of three residents sampled for contact precautions.Findings included: On 04/15/2026 at 11:07 AM, Staff M, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/ Unit Manager (UM), was observed entering the room of Resident #16 without wearing any personal protection equipment (PPE). Staff M walked about three feet into Resident #16's room, assisted Resident #16 out of her room via wheelchair, and positioned the resident on the outside of the room door, across from the nurse's station. Staff M then went back into Resident #16's room to remove the bedside table and positioned the bedside table next to Resident #16 outside of the room. Staff M was observed not wearing any PPE. Staff M was not observed to perform hand hygiene prior to or after making contact with Resident #16's person or personal belongings. Record review for Resident #16 revealed an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to accommodate a resident's right to communicate in the language of their choice for one resident (#18) of one observed, and failed to provide a resident with a bed that met his height,comfort and furnishings requirements for one resident (#5) of one resident observed.Findings included: During a facility tour 04/14/2026 at 10:51 a.m., Resident #18 was observed in bed. The resident did not respond to the interview and was observed pointing and using hand gestures in an attempt to express themselves. A family member who was in the room stated the resident does not speak English and that they spoke Arabic language. During this observation, there were no signs posted to direct anyone on this resident's preferred communication method. Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on date 4/26/2025, with diagnoses to include cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of right anterior cerebral artery, hemiparesis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician and family of a change in condition after a new skin condition was identified for one resident (#2) out of one resident observed.Findings included: Review of a Weekly Skin Integrity Assessment on 3/13/2026 and 3/19/2026 showed Resident #2 had bilateral lower arm bruises.Review of Progress Notes for Resident #2 did not show notification to family, physician, or the administration about the bilateral lower arm bruises found during the skin assessments on 3/13/2026 and 3/19/2026. Review of the Resident #2 information record dated 4/17/2026 showed Resident #2 was originally admitted [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses including Non-ST Elevation (NSTEMI) Myocardial Infarction, dementia, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder and chronic kidney disease.On 4/15/2026 at 2:41 p.m. an observation and interview were conducted with Staff E, Licensed Nurse Practitioner (LPN) about the discoloration on Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and review of the facility's housekeeping procedures, the facility failed to ensure shower rooms were maintained in a sanitary manner in one shower room (Zone One East) out of two shower rooms observed.Findings included: On 04/16/2026 at 2:48 p.m., the shower room in zone one East wing was observed to have black biological growth on the grout in between the tiles on the shower walls in addition to the grout in between the tiles on the shower floors. The black biological grown observed was observed on the shower walls and the floor upon entrance into the shower in addition to the floor perpendicular to the wall afore mentioned. An interview was conducted on 04/16/2026 at 3:53 p.m. with the housekeeping/laundry manager. The interview revealed the housekeeping staff was responsible for maintaining the cleanliness and sanitization of the shower rooms throughout the facility. The housekeeping/laundry manager stated housekeeping staff disinfects shower equipment, maintains the cleanliness of the shower room walls and floors, and removes trash from the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, records and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASRRs) were completed accurately for two residents (#17 and #18) out of eight residents sampled.Findings included:Review of an admission Record dated 4/16/2026 revealed Resident #17 was admitted to the facility originally on 12/18/2025 with diagnoses to include but not limited to bipolar disorder, unspecified, major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate, generalized anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, current episode manic without psychotic features, and Parkinson's disease.Review of Resident #17's level I PASRR dated 12/17/2025, showed under screening decision making in section A only bipolar disorder was checked and no other mental illnesses were checked. The review showed the level I PASRR was incomplete, and a level II was not submitted for consideration.Review of an admission Record dated 04/15/2026 revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement the care plan related to fall interventions for one residents (#16) of two observed and failed to follow the resident's care plan for protective heel boots for one resident (#108) of one observed. Findings included: 1. On 4/13/2026 at 10:37 a.m. Resident #16 was observed in her room lying flat in bed. She was noted with fall floor mats on either side of her bed. The fall floor mat on the right side of the bed was observed in a folded position and positioned against the wall, away from the bed. Further observations revealed the call light was placed on the back left side of the pillow, out from her reach. Resident #16 confirmed she would not be able to reach her call light should she need it. The same observations were made on 4/14/2026 at 1:24 p.m. and on 4/16/2026 at 9:03 a.m. On 4/13/2026 at 10:40 a.m. an interview and observation with Staff B, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) confirmed Resident #16 was in bed and lying on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to review, revise and update interventions for a fall care plan to ensure safety and prevent accidents for one Resident (#18) out of five residents sampled. Findings included: Review of an admission Record dated 04/15/2026 revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of right anterior cerebral artery, muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified, unspecified, difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified, and generalized muscle weakness.Review of a Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation, (SBAR) Communication Form, and Progress Note for Registered Nurses, RN's/ License Practical Nurses, LPN/ License Vocational Nurses, LVN, dated 3/8/2026 showed a change in condition due to a fall. At 8 p.m., resident observed lying on the floor near his bed and wheelchair. Review of an SBAR Communication Form, and Progress Note dated 2/2/2026 showed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to document and plan the discharge process, for one of three residents sampled (Resident #1).Findings Included:During an interview on 01/05/26 at 12:47 PM, Resident #1's representative stated the resident was discharged home without supplies and the home health care company did not show up. During an interview on 01/05/26 at 01:22 PM, with Staff B, Social Services Worker (SSW), and the Social Services Director, SSD. Staff B, SSW stated the home health care provider had not been confirmed for Resident #1, prior to discharge on [DATE]. Staff B, stated no supplies were provided to Resident #1 at discharge. Staff B, stated Resident #1 was not reached out to post discharge from the facility. Staff B, stated being made aware the home health care provider had declined to admit Resident #1. Resident #1 had to ascertain a different home health care provider. Review of Resident #1's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$29,328 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $3,418 — penalty dated 2024-02-06
• $25,910 — penalty dated 2024-01-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIATA HEALTH GROUP — 50 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $264K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL