No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Aviata At The Sea - Pompano Beach

2401 NE 2nd Street, Pompano Beach, FL 33062 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 83 certified beds · (954) 943-5100 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (954) 943-5100 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
50 NE 26th Ave 303 · (954) 942-8924 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
12 N Federal Hwy · (954) 283-7075 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Publix0.1 mi
2511 E Atlantic Blvd · (954) 786-7964 · Call to confirm hours
Park
NE 24th Ave · (954) 786-4503 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
222 N Federal Hwy · (954) 698-9771

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.1%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.0%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.3%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.8%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.4%9.5%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.4%14.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.6%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.9%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.2%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.7%94.7%79.4%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.61
RN hours/ resident / day
0.76
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.03
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.40
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
37.3%
Total nursing turnover
53.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 83 beds and averages 76.4 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-03)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-21)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Level I was completed for a resident with mental disorders who was [NAME] Act to the hospital due to a crisis state of violent/aggressive behaviors and then was readmitted to the facility for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #2). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), dated 11/08/21, included the following: the center will assure that all Serious Mentally Ill (SMI) and Intellectually Disabled (ID) residents receive appropriate pre-admission screenings according to Federal/State guidelines. The purpose is to ensure that the residents with SMI or are ID receive the care and services they need in the most appropriate setting. Procedure: 1.It is the responsibility of the center to assess and assure that the appropriate preadmission screenings, either Level I or Level II, are conducted and results obtained prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to revise the care plan for a resident with recent increased violent/aggressive behaviors towards other residents and staff for 1 of 1 sample resident reviewed for mental disorders (Resident #2). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Plans of Care, revised date 09/25/17, included the following: An individualized person-centered plan of care will be established by the interdisciplinary team (IDT) with the resident and/or resident representative(s) to the extent practicable and updated in accordance with the state and federal regulatory requirements. Plan of care is to be maintained as part of the final medical record. Procedure: Review, update and/or revise the comprehensive plan of care based on changing goals, preferences and needs of the resident and in response to current interventions after the completion of each OBRA MDS assessment (except discharge assessments), and as needed. The interdisciplinary team shall ensure the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to keep food safety requirements in accordance with professional standard of food service safety, for 1 of 2 visits to the main kitchen. The findings included: A review of the State Operations Manual Appendix PP (Rev. 211; Issued: 02-03-23; Effective: 10-21-22; Implementation: 10-24-22) showed the following: Food handling risks associated with food stored on the units may include but are not limited to: Food stored in a manner (open containers, without covers, spillage from one food item onto another, etc.) that allows cross-contamination. Machine Washing and Sanitizing-Dishwashing machines use either heat or chemical sanitization methods. The following are general recommendations for each method according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Services, and Food and Drug Administration Food Code. High Temperature Dishwasher (heat sanitization): · Wash - 150-165 degrees Fahrenheit. · Final Rinse - 180 degrees Fahrenheit. In a tour of the main kitchen conducted on 03/31/25 at 7:21 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-03 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of refuse in a sanitary manner. The findings included: A review of the facility ' s policy titled Solid Waste management dated 11/30/2014 showed the following: solid waste shall be handled and disposed of in a manner that shall ensure a safer and sanitary facility environment. In an observation conducted on 03/31/25 at 8:18 AM, the garbage area near the back of the main kitchen was noted with debris consistent with dirty gloves, food debris, cans of soda, bottled water, medicine cups, supplements, and other debris. In an observation conducted on 04/1/25 at 8:44 AM, the garbage refuse area in the back of the facility was noted with 3 round garbage bins with overflowing garbage bags. Closer observation revealed dirty gloves and other debris around the main dumpster area. In an interview conducted on 4/1/25 at 10:50 AM with the Kitchen Manager, he stated checking the back area dumpster every other day will pick up any stuff he sees and will clean around. When asked who was responsible for ensuring that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide eating assistance in a dignified manner for 1 of 22 residents observed during in-room dining (Resident #51) and failed to provide privacy during personal care for 1 of 22 residents observed during the initial tour (Resident #26). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Bathing/Showering revised on 09/01/17 documented .assure privacy . Review of the facility's policy titled Perineal Care revised on 09/05/17 documented .provide privacy . 1) Review of Resident #51's clinical record documented an admission on [DATE] with no readmissions. The resident's diagnoses included Cerebral Infarction, Anemia and Major Depression. Review of Resident #51's physician orders dated 07/11/23 documented Admit to local hospice services, physician order dated 10/05/23 documented Resident needs assistance with feeding. Review of Resident #51's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 8 out of 39 rooms. The findings included: 1) On 04/01/2025 at 8:45 AM, an observation revealed that room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom toilet seat is peeling off. The bathrooms wall has a hole in it that is filled with gloves and hair. The floor of the shower has black spots. 2) On 04/01/2025 at 8:55 AM, an observation revealed that room [ROOM NUMBER]'s door laminate is coming off which is impeding the door from opening smoothly. 3) On 04/01/2025 at 9:00 AM, an observation revealed that room [ROOM NUMBER]'s door cannot close. 4) On 04/01/2025 at 9:10AM, an observation revealed that room [ROOM NUMBER]-CD and room [ROOM NUMBER]-CD have loose baseboards. 5) On 04/01/2025 at 9:15 AM, an observation revealed that room [ROOM NUMBER]-AB is missing the room separator curtain. 6) On 04/01/2025 at 9:20 AM, an observation revealed that room [ROOM NUMBER]-AB's window crank handle is broken. 7) On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to address catheter care in the baseline care plan for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #182). The findings included: Resident #182 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction, Urinary Tract Infection and Dysuria. He was admitted with a Foley Catheter (an indwelling urinary catheter). His Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was 12 on 03/28/25. This indicated mild cognitive impairment. In an interview with the resident on 04/01/25 at 8:41 AM he stated he was not sure why he has a catheter and stated he came from the hospital with it. A review of the resident's baseline care plan revealed no documentation regarding the resident's Foley catheter. On 04/02/25 at 2:03 PM an interview was conducted with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) coordinator. She stated that his baseline care plan is effective because tomorrow is his Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to initiate a personalized Care Plan for 4 out of 22 sampled residents (Resident #48, Resident #74, Resident #2, Resident #31). The findings included: 1. A record review showed that Resident #48 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of other bacterial meningitis and metabolic encephalopathy. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly dated 01/25/2025 revealed that the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score is 3, which indicates severe cognitive impairment. Section GG of the MDS showed that Resident #48 is dependent on toileting hygiene, bathing/showering and personal hygiene. Based on abused allegations regarding Resident #48, a review of the care plans was conducted and revealed the following: care plan dated 01/24/2025 stated that Resident #48 is dependent on staff for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs with Cognitive deficits, Physical Limitations. But no care plan was found for Resident #48 indicating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care in a timely manner for 1 of 1 sampled resident for incontinence care (Resident #65) and failed to obtain a physician order for hospice services for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #71). The findings included: 1) Review of Resident #65's clinical record documented an admission on [DATE] and readmission on [DATE]. The resident diagnoses included Epilepsy, Fracture of Left great toe, Contusion of Eyeball and Orbital tissues, Acute Cystitis without Hematuria and Anxiety Disorder. Review of Resident #65's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of the Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating that the resident had moderate cognition impairment. The assessment documented under Functional Abilities and Goals that the resident needed partial/moderate assistance from the staff for toileting and walking was not attempted due to medical condition or safety concerns. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to identify a severe weight loss in a timely manner, provide adequate nutritional supplements to prevent further severe weight loss and follow weight policy for 3 out of 4 residents sampled for nutrition (Resident #36, Resident #13 and Resident #9). The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Weighing the Resident effective on 11/30/2014 showed that residents will be weighed unless ordered otherwise by the physician: admission/re-admission x3 days, weekly x 4 weeks, monthly thereafter, and as needed. 1. A record review showed that Resident #36 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia and Hypothyroidism. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) entry dated 03/11/2025 revealed that the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score is 13, which indicates mild cognitive impairment. A thorough review of the weight log for Resident #36 showed the following respectively: 03/05/2025:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for tube feeding and the facility's policy regarding weights, resulting in weight loss for 1 of 1 resident sampled for tube feeding (Resident #5). The findings included: The facility's policy titled, Weighing the Resident, dated 11/30/2014, revealed the following: Resident will be weighted unless ordered otherwise by the physician: Admission/readmission times 3 days. Weekly times 4 weeks. Monthly thereafter. As needed. A record review revealed that Resident #5 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes, Seizures, and Depressive Disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03 which indicated Resident #5 was severely cognitively impaired. A review of the physician orders showed an order for Glucerna 1.5 (tube feeding formula) at 60 milliliters (ml) an hour for 20 hours to provide 1200ml,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the correct fluid restrictions as per the Physician ' s order for 1 of 1 sampled Resident on Dialysis (Resident #27). The findings included: A record review revealed Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes, Severe Chronic Kidney Disease, and Anemia. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #27 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which is cognitively intact. The Physician ' s order dated 1/2/2025 showed the following: Fluid restriction: 1000 milliliters (ml) a day. Dietary 420ml a day, Breakfast coffee 180ml, Lunch apple juice 120ml, Dinner 120ml and Nursing 580ml. In an interview conducted on 3/31/25 at 12:00 PM, Resident #27 stated she goes to dialysis three times a week and is on fluid restriction. She said, I think I am allowed 32 ounces of fluids daily. The former Clinical Dietitian visited her but she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staffing to 4 of 22 sampled residents (Resident #2, #6, #36 and #52) as evidenced by failure to provide two nursing staff to provide assistance with repositioning/ turning a total dependent care resident (Resident #2); failure to provide personal care in a timely manner (Resident #6); failure to provide incontinent care in a timely manner (Resident #36) and failure to assist a resident during dining in a timely manner (Resident #52). This had the potential to affect 75 residents in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: 1) Review of Resident #2's clinical record documented an admission on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Cerebral Infarction, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, Acute Hematogenous Osteomyelitis, Cerebral Vascular Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Anxiety Disorder, Morbid Obesity and Apraxia (a disorder of the brain and nervous system in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to monitor the side effects and behavior of a resident on psychotropic medication (Resident #9), failed to have a written clinical rational note on the pharmacist recommendations for Resident #9 and Resident #2, and failed to monitor side effect for a resident on anticoagulant medication (Resident #2) for 2 of 5 residents sampled for Unnecessary Medications. The findings included: 1. A record review revealed Resident #9 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Anxiety, Depression, and Psychosis. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #9 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which is cognitively intact. A review of the Physician orders showed an order for Remeron (depressive medication) 15 milligrams 1 tablet at bedtime, which started on 11/21/24. The continued review did not show a Physician's orders to monitor the medication's side effects or the behavior of Resident #9. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow its own menu portions for a Regular diet. This has the potential to affect 39 out of 75 residents currently on a Regular diet. The findings included: A review of the facility ' s menu, week 1 lunch Day 4 showed the following: open-faced roast pork 1 sandwich 2 ounces portion with brown gravy, mashed potatoes, buttered noodles, and herb green beans. In an interview conducted on 4/2/25 at 11:30 AM with the Dietary Manager, he stated the portion for the pork today is 2 ounces on the regular diet. In an observation of the lunch tray line conducted on 4/2/25 at 11:35 AM, Staff I, the Account Manager, noted plating 3 plates with roast pork for the regular diet consistency. The weight of the first slice of pork was taken using a facility ' s scale, which showed that it was 1 ounce. The weight of the second slice of pork was taken using a facility ' s scale, which showed that it was 1.5 ounces. Both lunch plates contained less than the required 2 ounces of pork as per the facility ' s menu. In an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide food that meets residents' preferences, for 2 out of 65 sampled residents observed during dining. (Resident #78, Resident #77) The findings included: 1. A record review showed that Resident #78 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of lower respiratory tract. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score is 05, which indicates severe cognitive impairment. During an observation conducted on 03/31/2025 at 8:40 AM this surveyor observed that Resident #78 meal ticket consisted of: #8 Scoop of Pureed French Toast, 1 Margarine, 1 Syrup, #16 Scoop of Ground Sausage Patty, 2 ounces (oz) of [NAME] Gravy, #6 Scoop of Pureed Hot Cereal, 8oz of Honey Thickened Milk, 4oz of Honey Thickened Orange Juice and 6oz of Honey Thickened Coffee or Hot Tea. Resident #78's tray did not have the margarine, the syrup, and the 2 ounces of [NAME] Gravy. 2. A record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings were conducted quarterly, and that the necessary staff members attended those meetings for 3 of 6 months reviewed during QAPI review. The findings included: A review of the facility ' s policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program, dated 11/30/2014, showed that the Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee (QAA) meetings are at least quarterly but may be held more frequently as appropriate. The QAA committee members include, but are not limited to, the Executive Director, Medical Director, Director of Nursing, and Infection Preventionist. A review of records revealed the last QAPI meeting was held on December 18, 2024. Further review did not show that a QAPI meeting was conducted in March 2025 or the sign-in sheet with all the necessary staff members. In an interview conducted on 4/3/25 at 5:00 PM with the facility ' s Administrator, he started in this facility in March of this year and had one QAPI meeting with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review; the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines by failing to wear a disposable gown during personal care and wound care for Resident #36, failing to have PPE (Personal Protective Equipent) readily accessible for residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions, failing to wear a disposable gown during medication administration to a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precaution for Resident #71, and failing to provide contact precautions per Physician order for Resident #31. This had the potential to affect 12 residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions and 1 resident on Contact Precautions. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Standard Precautions: revised on October 2018 documented .hand hygiene after .removing PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) .gloves .after gloves are removed, wash hands immediately to avoid transfer of microorganism to other resident or environment . Review of the facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet infection control standards of practice related to a midline catheter used for intravenous (IV) antibiotics or fluids, for 2 of 2 observed residents (Residents #2 and #3). The findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was cognitively intact and required substantial/maximum assist with activities of daily living (ADL). A review of Resident #2's orders revealed an order dated 02/07/25 for a midline catheter, and to flush the midline catheter with 10 milliliters (ml) of saline every shift and as needed. An observation of Resident #2 was conducted with Staff A, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on 02/11/25 at 11:45 AM. Resident #2's midline catheter IV line was observed without a cap, leaving the line open to the bloodstream. Staff A stated the midline catheter should have a cap on it. Resident #2 stated she was not aware…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-26 · tag F0660 — pattern
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a discharge plan for 3 out of 3 residents sampled for discharge to the community (Residents #3, #7 and #8). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Discharge Planning with an effective date of 11/30/14 included in part the following: To evaluate the resident's health status and formulate the best plan of discharge for each resident. Discharge planning begins the day of admission. The process involves the resident and family, Care Management/Social Services, and other members of the clinical team. An initial evaluation of a resident is completed upon admission. A discharge goal and length of stay will be established upon admission and reviewed/revised at plan of care conferences. The goal is based upon clinical findings, availability of community and family resources and resident/family goals. Discharge planning record will be completed within 7 days after admission. Discharge planning is adjusted as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARR) completed for 2 of 19 sampled residents (Resident #15 & Resident #20). The findings included: Review of the PASARR level I, dated 8/4/2017 and updated on 12/1/2019, documented that Resident #20 was admitted to the facility with a non-provisional PASARR. The level I documented that Resident #20 had diagnoses or suspicion of Significant Mental Illness. Since the resident's admission, no Level II PASARR was completed. Resident #20's relevant diagnoses included: Cognitive communication deficit; Schizophrenia; Legal Blindness; and Convulsions. Review of the Psychiatric evaluation dated 06/15/23 revealed that Resident # 20 exhibited no delusions and no hallucinations. The psychiatric record recommended no changes in Resident #20's medications. The Psychiatrist noted that the benefits outweighed the risks for antipsychotic use. Resident #20 was still taking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to employ sufficient dietary staff safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service that include; preparation of food to ensure nutritional value, appearance, and palatability, serve meals in a timely manner, ensure sanitation regulations are followed, and ensure physician ordered therapeutic and mechanically altered diets are followed. The findings include: During the initial food service sanitation tour conducted on 12/18/23 at 8:50 AM, it was noted that there were only 2 staff members working in the kitchen preparing and serving the breakfast meal. Further observation noted that the 2 members of staff included a newly hired cook and the Food Service Director (FSD). A review of the posted staffing schedule for 12/18/23 noted that 3 staff members (2 cooks and 2 diet aides) were scheduled. Interview with the FSD at the time of the observation noted that 2 diet aides failed to report to work without notification. Further observation noted that at 10 AM the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance service necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 14 of 21 resident rooms, 1 of 1 common areas on the first floor, 1 of 1 common areas on the second floor, and in the laundry area. The findings included: During the initial resident screening of resident rooms conducted by the surveyors on 12/18/23, and the Environment Tour conducted on 12/20/23 at 10:30 AM, accompanied with the facility's Director of Maintenance and Corporate Maintenance Director, the following were noted: 1) First Floor: room [ROOM NUMBER]: Bathroom lights not working (1 of 2) room [ROOM NUMBER]: Exterior of over-bed tables (2 of 2) were noted to have areas of peeling paint and rust. room [ROOM NUMBER]: Room window blinds broken and could not be closed. room [ROOM NUMBER]: Room floor tile cracked, stained black, and broken. room [ROOM NUMBER]: Offensive urine odor in main room and bathroom,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to initiate a grievance for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #151) who reported the loss of his personal property (cell phone) at the facility. The findings included: Resident #151 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of: Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting left dominant side; Hypertension; Diabetes Mellitus due to underlying condition with other diabetic Kidney complications; Depression unspecified; Anxiety Disorder; Unspecified Psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. Restlessness and Agitation. On 12/18/2023 at approximately 11:33 AM, Resident #151 was observed in bed. During this time, the resident's Power of Attorney (POA) stated, via an identified electronic device, that he had sent a cell phone to Resident #151 in order to facilitate communication with the resident when he is out of his room and around and about the facility. The POA stated, he was told by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 3 of 19 sampled residents (Residents #7, Resident #15 and Resident #45). The findings included: 1. Review of Resident #7's record revealed an admission date of 05/13/13, with the diagnoses of Atherosclerosis, Coronary Heart Disease, Anxiety Disorder and Schizoaffective Disorder. Review of the physician orders documented the following for Resident #7: Seroquel 25 mg at bedtime for Schizophrenia. Seroquel 50 mg at bedtime for Schizophrenia Risperdal 0.25 mg for Schizoaffective Disorders, 1 tab a day; Xanax tablet 2 mg for Anxiety, every 12 hours. Further record review showed that the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) level II was completed on 05/11/21. Review of the quarterly (MDS) assessment section (I) dated 11/9/23 documented Resident # 7 was diagnosed with Anxiety and Schizophrenia which confirmed that the facility was aware of Resident #7's mental status. On 12/21/23 at 9:40 AM, the MDS Coordinator stated that she has been working at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services for necessary adaptive eating equipment for 1 of 7 sampled residents reviewed for Nutrition (Resident #28). The findings included: During the observation of the Breakfast meal on 12/19/23 at 8:30 AM, it was noted that the meal tray was served to the room of Resident #28. A review of the tray ticket noted documentation of a Renal Diet with a 1500 ml Fluid Restriction and Weighted Fork. Observation of the meal tray noted only a weighted fork and spoon. Interview with the alert and oriented resident at the time of the observation noted to state that she would like to receive a weighted Knife with all meals and had requested weighted silverware on previous occasions. She further stated that numerous meals she is not receiving weighted silverware and also stated she needs weighted utensils due to poor grasping ability for both hands. During the observation of the Lunch meal on 12/19/23 at 12:30 PM, it was noted on only a weighted fork was included on the meal tray. The tray did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident receives wound care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for wound care (Resident #200) . The findings included: Review of the facility's policy provided by the facility's Regional Nurse, titled Clinical Guideline Skin and Wound effective 04/01/17 with no revision date documented .on admission/readmission the resident's skin will be evaluated for baseline skin condition and documented in the medical record . Review of Resident #200's clinical record documented an admission on [DATE] with no readmissions. The resident diagnoses included Local Infection of the Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue, Osteomyelitis of Ankle and Foot, Non-Pressure Chronic Ulcer of Foot, Diabetes Mellitus, and Morbid Obesity. Review of Resident #200's Admission/readmission Data Collection (nursing form) and the skilled nurse note dated 12/09/23 lacked written description of Resident#200's foot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders to provide care to a Central/Midline venous access catheter for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for Catheter Care (Resident #200). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Catheter Insertion and Care- Midline Dressing Changes revised on 01/17/19 documented .change midline catheter dressing .every 5-7 days or if it is wet, dirty, no intact or compromised in any way .the following information should be recorded in the residents' medical record: date and time dressing was changed, condition of sutures, any education given to the resident, resident's statement regarding IV therapy . Review of the facility's policy titled Catheter Insertion and Care-Flushing Central Venous and Midline Catheters revised on 01/17/19 documented .midline and central line access devices will be flushed to maintain patency .flush catheter at regular intervals . the following information should be recorded in the resident'' medical record: date and time the medication was administered, type…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the medication error rate was 12 percent. Three medication errors were identified while observing a total of 25 opportunities, affecting Resident #200, #37 and #12. The findings included: 1) Review of Resident #200's physician order dated 12/17/23 documented Vancomycin Intravenous solution use 1.5 gram intravenously three time a day for Osteomyelitis until 01/03/24, in sodium chloride 0.9%, 500-millimeter (ml) bag, rate: 250 ml/hour every 8 hours. Review of the facility's pharmacy Vancomycin delivery receipt documented that the antibiotic was delivered on 12/18/23 at 1:49 AM. Review of Resident #200's December 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented Vancomycin Intravenous use 1.5-gram three time a day for Osteomyelitis until 01/03/24, in sodium chloride 0.9%, 500-millimeter (ml) bag, rate: 250 ml/hour every 8 hours. The Vancomycin administration times were scheduled as 9:00 AM, 1:00 PM and 5:00 PM. The review revealed that the Vancomycin antibiotic solution first dose was administered on 12/18/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to: 1) ensure that residents medications and biologicals were properly stored as evidenced by medications and biologicals being left on the resident's night stand for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #5 and #12); and 2) to ensure that it secured the Medication cart #1 (second floor unit) and Treatment Cart (second floor unit). The findings included: Review of a document provided by the Acting Director of Nursing titled Medication Storage Information-Best Practice Guidelines undated documented that medication carts and storage rooms must be locked at all times . The document did not address medication at the resident's bedside and did not address treatment carts. The sister facility's Director of Nursing and the Regional Nurse were asked multiple times for the facility policy related to medication Storage and was not provided. 1) Review of Resident #5's clinical record revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE] with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide 66 of 69 residents with foods that were prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, appearance, and is palatable, attractive, and appetizing. The findings included: Review of the facility's Policies & Procedures noted the following: Food Quality and Palatability: Policy Statement (Revised 2/2023): < Food will be prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, nutritive flavor, and appearance. < Food will be palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. < Food and liquids are prepared and served in manner, and texture to meet resident's needs. Procedures Include: < Cooks are responsible for food preparation. Menus are prepared according to the menu, production guidelines, and standardized recipes. < Cooks prepare food in accordance with recipes and use proper cooking techniques to ensure color and flavor retention. 1) During the initial kitchen sanitation tour conducted on 12/18/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, The facility failed to ensure pureed foods were prepared in a form to meet the needs of 4 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #6, #16, #20, and #31) with physician ordered pureed diets. The findings include: 1) During the observation of the lunch meal in the main kitchen on 12/18/23 at 11:45 AM, a half pan of Pureed Tilapia was observed and located on the steam table. Further observation of the pureed fish, it was noted to have small pieces of fish within the pureed mixture. At the request of the surveyor, the pureed fish was test tasted by the surveyor and the Contacted District Manager to ensure that the pureed mixture was the correct pureed smooth consistency. The surveyor and District Manager both agreed that the fish was not pureed to the proper smooth consistency and could potentially be an issue for residents with swallowing or Dysphagia issues. The District Manager requested from the cook (Staff C), that the pureed fish not be served until the proper consistency was obtained. A further interview with Staff C, revealed that he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician ordered therapeutic diets (Fluid Restriction) were not followed for 1 of 7 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #28). The findings included: During the review of the clinical record of Resident #28, the following were noted: Date Of re-admission: [DATE] Diagnoses: Chronic Kidney Disease of which noted the resident requires Dialysis (3 times per week (Monday/Wednesday/Friday). The resident leaves the facility on these days at 9:30 AM and returns at 4 PM. Review of current physician orders noted: 4/26/22: Renal Diet 7/25/23: 1500 ml Fluid Restriction (800 ml from dietary and 700 ml from nursing) Review of current Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated 10/18 /23 noted: Section C: BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status score=15 (No Cognitive Impairment) Section G: Eat = Independent Section K: No weight loss Section l: No dental issues During the review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety that potentially affected 66 of the facility's 69 residents. The findings included: 1) Review of the facility's Dietary Department Policy & Procedures noted the following: 1. Environment (No Implementation Date): * All food preparation areas, food service areas, and dining areas will be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. Procedures Included: < The Food Service Director will ensure that the kitchen is maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, including floors, ceilings, lighting, and ventilation. < The Food Service Director will ensure that all employees are knowledgeable in their proper procedures for cleaning and sanitizing all food service equipment and surfaces. < The Food Service Director will ensure that a routine cleaning schedule is in place for all cooking equipment, food storage areas, and surfaces. 2: Food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents were offered eligible immunizations annually as evidenced by the lack of written consents for declination or acceptance of immunizations for 3 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for immunization review (Resident #5, #21 and #200). The findings included: 1) Review of Resident #5's clinical record revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 and Panic Disorders. Review of Resident #5's Minimum Data Set annual assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 0, indicating severe cognitive impairment. On 12/21/23 at 1:38 PM, an interview was conducted with the facility's Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that the admission nurse should be offering the Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccine to the residents on admission. A side by side review of Resident #5's immunization record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-18 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to safeguard residents' protected health information for 5 of 5 residents' names with Protected Health Information (PHI) posted in public area, Residents #7, #20, #25, #37 and #107. The census at the time of the survey was 55. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Confidentiality and Privacy, effective date 11/30/14, provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) documented, in part, the policy is implemented for the purpose of complying with the privacy/security regulations promulgated under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) .It is the policy of The Company, LLC to protect the confidentiality of Protected Health Information of its residents . On 08/15/22 at 7:40 AM, an entrance to the facility was made through a locked double door into the main hallway. Observation revealed an open large dining room to the left and the kitchen door to the right. Further observations revealed an 8 x 11 inch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-18 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate assessment and treatment related to mental health concerns; failed to ensure a physician signature on the order for a [NAME] Act; and failed to ensure correct documentation on a [NAME] Act Form for one of one resident, Resident #25. The findings included: Resident #25 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #25 was sent to the hospital as an involuntary admission to an acute care hospital, as a State [NAME] Act, on 08/08/22. The resident was returned to the facility a few hours later on 08/08/22, as the [NAME] Act had been removed. Resident #25 had a medical history of a stroke, leaving it difficult for him to speak and swallow, muscle weakness, depression and anxiety, seizures, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed by the facility on 06/08/22 which showed Resident #25 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the medication error rate was 12 percent (%). Three (3) medication errors were identified while observing a total of (25) opportunities, affecting 2 of 8 residents observed, Residents #54 and #29. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration with a revision date 01/01/22, documented, in part, .during medication administration .administer medications within the timeframe specified by facility .after medication administration .document necessary medication administration/treatment information . 1. Review of Resident #54's clinical record documented an admission on [DATE] and a readmission on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Right Femur Fracture, Pleural Effusion, Cholecystitis, Urinary Tract Infection, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage and Deficiency of other Vitamins. Review of Resident #54's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment, dated 07/24/22, documented, a Brief Interview of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents' medications were properly supervised / stored as evidenced by over the counter medications being left unattended on the resident's bedside table for Resident #22 and #24 and as evidenced by residents' insulin (pens) medications being left on top of the medication cart unattended and unsecured for Resident #106 and #108. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, with a revision date of 01/01/22, provided by the Director of Nursing, documented .facility staff should not leave medications or chemicals unattended . Review of the facility's policy, titled, Self-Administration of Medications at Bedside, revised on 08/22/17, provided by the administrator, documented .verify physicians order in the resident's chart for self-administration of specific medications under consideration. Complete Self-Administration of Medications Evaluation .complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-18 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, policy review and record review, the facility failed to provide physical therapy as ordered by the physicians for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents #14 and #36). The findings included: The facility's policy titled Rehab Services Policies and Procedures effective 05/01/02 and revised 11/05/21 reveals Genesis Rehab Services .provide skilled rehabilitation services to patients as ordered by physician or appropriately credentialed/licensed non-physician practitioner (NPP). 1. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from a long term care facility post spinal fusion. He had additional diagnoses of Dorsalgia, Muscle Weakness, and unsteadiness on feet. His brief interview of mental status (BIMS) was 15, per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 05/22/22, which indicated he was cognitively intact. On 05/16/22, the physician wrote an order for physical therapy evaluate and treat. On 08/15/22 at 9:38 AM, Resident #14 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents medications were documented as administered for prescribed medications for 2 of 8 sampled residents, Resident # 24, and Resident #54 during medication administration observation. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Physician Orders, revised, on 03/03/21, documented The center will ensure that Physician orders are appropriately and timely documented in the medical record. Information received from the referring facility or agency to be reviewed, verified with the physician and transcribed to the electronic medical record. The attending physician will review and confirm orders 1. Review of Resident #54, clinical record documented an admission on [DATE] and a readmission on [DATE]. The resident diagnoses included Right Femur Fracture, Pleural Effusion, Cholecystitis, Urinary Tract Infection, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage and Deficiency of other Vitamins. Review of Resident #54's Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIATA HEALTH GROUP — 50 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.1+0.9 vs chain
The other 49 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspire At EvansFort Myers, FL 1 of 5Aviata At BenevaSarasota, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Big BendPerry, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Bryan DairyLargo, FL 1 of 5Aviata At FletcherTampa, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Palma Sola BayBradenton, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Saint LucieFort Pierce, FL 1 of 5Aviata At SarasotaSarasota, FL 1 of 5Aviata At SeminoleSeminole, FL 1 of 5Aviata At The BayTampa, FL 1 of 5Aviata At The PalmsPalm Harbor, FL 1 of 5Aviata At VeniceVenice, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Arbor SpringsOcala, FL 2 of 5Aviata At BradentonBradenton, FL 2 of 5Aviata At BrentwoodLecanto, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Colonial LakesWinter Garden, FL 2 of 5Aviata At EnglewoodEnglewood, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Grand OaksPalm Coast, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Green Cove SpringsGreen Cove Springs, FL 2 of 5Aviata At GreenacresGreen Acres, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Lakeside OaksDunedin, FL 2 of 5Aviata At OakfieldBrandon, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Santa BarbaraCape Coral, FL 2 of 5Aviata At South DaytonaSouth Daytona, FL 2 of 5Aviata At TallahasseeTallahassee, FL 2 of 5Aviata At The HarborSafety Harbor, FL 2 of 5Aviata At The Sea - PasadenaSouth Pasadena, FL 2 of 5Aviata At West Palm BeachWest Palm Beach, FL 2 of 5Aviata at Sand KeyClearwater, FL 3 of 5Aspire At Ridge HavenNew Port Richey, FL 3 of 5Aviata At BrooksvilleBrooksville, FL 3 of 5Aviata At Central ParkBrandon, FL 3 of 5Aviata At Coral BayWest Palm Beach, FL 3 of 5Aviata At CountrysidePalm Harbor, FL 3 of 5Aviata At JacksonvilleJacksonville, FL 3 of 5Aviata At North Fort MyersN Ft Myers, FL 3 of 5Aviata At RosewoodOrlando, FL 3 of 5Aviata At San JoseJacksonville, FL 3 of 5Aviata At St CloudSaint Cloud, FL 3 of 5Aviata At The Sea - Harbor BeachFort Lauderdale, FL

Showing 40 of 49; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
2ND STREET PARENT LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/02/2023
POMPANO BCH HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/02/2023
FREUND, NOCHUMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/02/2023
SELF, JAREDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/13/2025
ZELFMAN, MIKHAILIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/21/2025
DAGAN, AMITAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/11/2025
GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/11/2025
GOLDBERGER, FAIGYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/11/2025
HERSKOWITZ, ELIEZERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/11/2025
HERSKOWITZ, YAAKOVIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/11/2025
TRAVITSKY, AARONIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/11/2025
ASPIRE MGT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/02/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$1.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-56.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$88K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 0%Other / private 22%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $88K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$373per resident / day
operating cost
$11,343per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$239per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105258. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next