No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Aviata At Bryan Dairy

9035 Bryan Dairy Rd, Largo, FL 33777 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 158 certified beds · (727) 395-9619 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0565)4 immediate-jeopardy citations$45,660 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2025
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $45,660 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-24)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
8905 BRYAN DAIRY Rd · (727) 393-7542 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
8905 Bryan Dairy Rd · (727) 393-7542 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
10801 Starkey Rd Ste 200 · (727) 397-4223 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.3%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.0%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.1%4.6%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.0%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.2%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication34.9%14.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.1%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.7%10.5%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.5%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.3%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine71.9%94.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.9%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.2%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.702.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.101.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
30.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 30.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 120 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.4%CMS range 39.7–64.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 7.6–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge30.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge35.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge30.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge94.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.2–11.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.051.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.35
RN hours/ resident / day
0.92
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.09
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.37
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
54.5%
Total nursing turnover
65.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 158 beds and averages 147.8 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-06-12)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2022-04-01)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives were implemented in a timely manner and failed to ensure the residents' wishes were honored related to full code status for one resident (#5) of three residents sampled. On [DATE] at 1:09 a.m., Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) obtained Resident #5's oxygen saturation level (Sp02) which was 84% with supplemental oxygen by nasal cannula. According to emedicinehealth oxygen saturation levels below 95% are considered abnormal, and the brain may be affected when SpO2 levels drop below 80 to 85 percent. https://www.emedicinehealth.com/what_is_a_good_oxygen_rate_by_age/article_em.htm retrieved on [DATE]. Staff B, LPN did not notify the medical provider or document interventions regarding the change in condition. At approximately 3:15 a.m., Staff B, LPN found Resident #5 pulseless and not breathing. The staff member summoned Staff I, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and Staff C, LPN to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from deprivation of goods and services by failing to ensure timely Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) was provided, per the resident's wishes, and failed to notify the physician of a change in condition for one resident (#5) out of three residents sampled for advance directives.On [DATE] at 1:09 a.m., Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) obtained Resident #5's oxygen saturation level (Sp02) which was 84% with supplemental oxygen by nasal cannula. According to emedicinehealth oxygen saturation levels below 95% are considered abnormal, and the brain may be affected when SpO2 levels drop below 80 to 85 percent. https://www.emedicinehealth.com/what_is_a_good_oxygen_rate_by_age/article_em.htm retrieved on [DATE]. Staff B, LPN did not notify the medical provider or document interventions regarding the change in condition. At approximately 3:15 a.m., Staff B, LPN found Resident #5 pulseless and not breathing. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-24 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), was implemented in a timely manner and failed to ensure the residents' wishes were honored related to full code status for one resident (#5) of three residents sampled. Resident #5 had active physician orders for full code status and had expressed wishes to be resuscitated. On [DATE] at 1:09 a.m., Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) obtained Resident #5's oxygen saturation level (Sp02) which was 84% with supplemental oxygen by nasal cannula. According to emedicinehealth oxygen saturation levels below 95% are considered abnormal, and the brain may be affected when SpO2 levels drop below 80 to 85 percent. https://www.emedicinehealth.com/what_is_a_good_oxygen_rate_by_age/article_em.htm retrieved on [DATE]. Staff B, LPN did not notify the medical provider or document interventions regarding the change in condition. At approximately 3:15 a.m., Staff B, LPN found Resident #5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-24 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were competent in identifying resident's code status, providing timely Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and responding to a Change in Condition (CIC) for one resident (#5) out of three residents sampled. On [DATE] at 1:09 a.m., Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) obtained Resident #5's oxygen saturation level (Sp02) which was 84% with supplemental oxygen by nasal cannula. According to emedicinehealth oxygen saturation levels below 95% are considered abnormal, and the brain may be affected when SpO2 levels drop below 80 to 85 percent. https://www.emedicinehealth.com/what_is_a_good_oxygen_rate_by_age/article_em.htm retrieved on [DATE]. Staff B, LPN did not notify the medical provider or document interventions regarding the change in condition. At approximately 3:15 a.m., Staff B, LPN found Resident #5 pulseless and not breathing. The staff member summoned Staff I, Certified Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was in place in three rooms (124 B, 126 B and 204 A/B) out of 11 rooms observed.Findings included:During an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] B on 6/16/2025 at 08:46 A. M., there were three black live insects on the resident's overbed table near the resident's bed. In an immediate interview, the resident stated ants are always in her room, and that they never leave. She states she complains to the staff daily about issues including ants. She states she has seen big bugs in the facility as well. During a tour of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 06/17/2025 at 11:04 A. M., an observation of the bathroom revealed a live brown colored insect crawling on the wall under the sink, in the bottom right corner near where the floor tile meets the wall. In an interview with the resident explained there were insects in the facility and stated a roach was seen earlier crawling across the wardrobe header. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was labeled and dated, the floor in the walk in freezer was clean, and personal belongings were stored appropriately in one of one kitchen. Findings included: On 06/09/24 at 9:31 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. Two bags of opened pasta were observed with no date. There was a clear container of brown liquid in the walk-in cooler with no date. Pieces of paper and other trash were observed on the floor in the walk-in freezer. The Kitchen Manager confirmed the floor was dirty and stated today was cleaning day. There was an unknown food wrapped in plastic wrap with no label or date in the walk-in freezer. There was a container of cereal observed underneath the prep table in the food prep area with no date. A jacket was observed hanging from a dish rash where clean dishes were stored. On 06/12/24 at 11:59 a.m., the Kitchen Manager stated food should be labeled and dated as soon as items are put in a container or opened. She stated they have hangers for jackets. The Labeling and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the grievance policy was followed to include documentation, resolution, and follow-up for 11 of 13 residents attending the resident council meeting and seven (#40, #70, #59, #39, #58, #25, and #97) of 61 total residents sampled. Findings included: Review of the facility's policy and procedures titled Complaint/Grievance with an effective date of 11/30/2014 and a revised date of 10/24/2022, revealed: Policy - The center will support each resident's right to voice a complaint/grievance without fear of discrimination or reprisal. The center will make prompt efforts to resolve the complaint/grievance and informed the resident of progress towards resolution. Procedure: 1. An employee receiving a complaint/grievance from a resident, family member and/or visitor will initiate a complaint/grievance form. * Complaint/grievance forms will be available 24 hours per day seven days a week in an unsecured common area. *Accommodations will be made to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or resident representative in writing of the transfer/discharge and reason and send a copy of the notice to the State Long Term Care Ombudsman's Office for three (#177, #280, and #427) of four residents reviewed for hospitalization. Findings included: 1. A review of the admission Record showed Resident #177 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of a change in condition form revealed she was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] for altered mental status and did not return to the facility. Review of the medical record revealed no 'Nursing Home Transfer and Discharge Notice could be located and no documentation to indicate the Ombudsman was notified of the transfer/discharge. On 06/11/24 at 5:48 p.m., the Administrator confirmed they could not find any documentation to show the Ombudsman was notified of the discharge, and they did not have the Nursing Home Transfer and Discharge Form. 2. Review of the admission Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received an accurate Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for four (Residents #20, #36, #42, and #96) of six residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings included: 1. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #20 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia and mixed anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #20's PASARR dated 01/15/24 Section A. MI or suspected MI (check all that apply) showed the check boxes next to Anxiety Disorder and Schizophrenia were not marked. 2. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #96 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizophrenia unspecified, other seizures and alcohol abuse, uncomplicated. Review of Resident #96's PASARR dated 12/22/23 Section A. MI or suspected MI (check all that apply) showed the check boxes next to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nine residents (Residents #19, #48, #76, #79, #96 #106, #107, #117 and #279) of twenty three residents reviewed for smoking returned smoking materials to staff after the designated smoking times and when returning back from leave of absence (LOA). Findings included: On 06/09/24 at 1:00 p.m., a total of thirteen residents were observed smoking in the designated smoking area. Staff O, Concierge was observed only providing one resident their cigarettes and lighter. The twelve other residents were observed to have their cigarettes and lighters already in their possession. During an interview on 06/09/24 at approximately 1:00 p.m., Staff O, Concierge stated she only had to assist one resident during this smoke break as the other twelve residents had their cigarettes and lighters already in possession and smoked without assistance. During an interview on 06/09/24 at 1:25 p.m., Resident #117 stated she smokes. Resident #117 stated she kept her cigarettes with her at all times so no one would steal them.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and served at safe and appetizing temperatures for two (Resident #7 and #73) of six residents sampled for food. Findings included: During an interview on 06/09/24 at 10:38 a.m., Resident #73's family member stated he had filed grievances on her behalf related to food and care. He stated on May 5th, 2024, while he was visiting with Resident #73, the residents were served raw chicken. The family member stated a resident who was sharing the table with Resident #73 ate the whole thing. He stated he had taken a photo which he showed this surveyor, of red meat on the plate that the resident ate. He said, I told the nurse. I said if anyone gets sick, it is their fault. Review of Resident #73's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia. The record showed the family member was the Responsible Party. An interview on 06/12/24 at 11:30 a.m., revealed Resident #7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for two (Residents #16 and #32) of 2 residents sampled for dignity out of of 61 total residents sampled. Findings included: 1. An observation was conducted on 6/9/24 at 1:00 p.m. of Resident #16 going to the smoking patio in a wheelchair wearing a hospital gown with one sock on. The resident's skin was visible from the top center of her back to the top of her buttocks. Her hair was also observed to be matted and unkempt. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #16 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including mechanical loosening of internal left hip prosthetic joint and chronic pain syndrome. Review of Resident #16's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/25/2024, Section C - Cognitive Patterns showed her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 14, indicating she was cognitively intact. An interview was conducted on 6/9/24 at 4:19 p.m. with Resident #16. She stated she had not had clothes in three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had use of personal belongings for one (Resident #43) of five residents reviewed for personal property. Findings included: During an observation and interview on 06/09/24 at 10:20 a.m., Resident #43 stated she had been readmitted to the facility following a recent hospitalization. The resident stated she had been at the facility for 2 days and did not have her personal belongings. The resident was observed wearing a hospital gown. She stated she did not have her clothes. She stated she had asked staff, and everyone said, Okay, but they did not bring her clothes. The resident stated at her previous room she had all her personal items, stuffed animals and family pictures. She stated she had an air mattress to relief pressure because of wounds. She stated she had fall mats following previous falls. The resident said, most importantly, my glasses are missing. I cannot see without them. I have been asking staff for 2 days.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation & Misappropriation, the facility failed to ensure protection from repeated incidents of verbal abuse by Resident #96 towards one (Resident #34) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings included: During an interview on 06/11/24 at 12:50 p.m., Resident #34 stated he was receiving his medications at the nursing station around 7:00 a.m. this morning with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). Resident #34 stated while taking his medication Resident #96 came to the nurses station and verbally assaulted me calling me a fat ass and using the F word. Resident #34 stated Staff A Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) heard everything and all she did was apologize to me for his behavior. Resident #34 stated Staff B Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Unit Manager (UM) also came to speak with him and apologized for Resident #96's behavior towards him. Resident #34 stated this was not the first time this had occurred and he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASARR Program, the facility failed to complete the Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) documentation for one (#118) of six residents sampled for PASARRs. Findings included: Review of the admission record for Resident #118 revealed an admission date of 04/17/24 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, primary, depression, and unspecified mood affective disorder. Review of the medical record showed a Level I PASARR was not conducted upon admission. Review showed it was initiated on 05/26/24. Review of Resident #118's Level I PASARR dated 05/26/24 showed diagnoses of Depressive Disorder, other Mood Disorder and Alzheimer's Disease were indicated. The Level I PASARR showed the resident had exhibited behaviors that made them a danger to themselves or others. Level II evaluation section showed Resident #118 had documented behavioral observations, has interpersonal functioning problems, concentration persistence and pace problems, and difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) were appropriately provided for two (Residents #32, and #68) of five residents sampled for ADLs. Findings included: 1. An observation and interview was conducted on 6/10/24 at 11:27 a.m. with Resident #32. She was observed in a hospital style gown with hospital arm bands on her wrist. The resident said she did not get showers, and no one got her out of bed. Review of the admission Record for Resident #32 showed she was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including anemia, dementia, morbid obesity, overactive bladder, and anxiety disorders. Review of Resident #32's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Section C, Cognitive Patterns, showed her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was not completed. Section C did note Resident #32 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #32's task documentation by the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) showed the resident had two showers (6/3 and 6/10/24)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents unable to carry out ADL (Activities of Daily Living) received assistance related to hair care for one (Resident #117) of five residents reviewed for ADLs. Findings included: An observation and interview was conducted on 06/09/24 at 2:14 p.m. with Resident #117. The resident was observed with matted, tangled clumps of hair. She stated she had asked staff for help. She said, I need help with my hair. The staff are not available to help. They are too busy. There is not enough time for me. It will take time to untangle. No one has the time. The resident stated she had been begging staff to help her with her hair since admission. She stated she did not like looking like a bird's nest. She said, it is embarrassing. I would like to brush my hair again. Review of the admission Record for Resident #117 showed an admission date of 04/15/24, with diagnoses to include partial traumatic metacarpophalangeal amputation of unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident received proper treatment to maintain communication abilities for one (Resident #280) of three residents sampled. Findings included: Review of the admission Record for Resident #280 revealed an original admission date of 04/29/24 and a re-admission date of 06/03/24 with diagnoses to include Deaf non-speaking. During an observation on 06/09/24 at 9:30 a.m., Resident #280 was laying on his bed staring at the Television which was turned off. The resident did not respond to the interview. The resident looked at this surveyor and initiated hand movements, signaling he communicated via sign language. A look around the room revealed there were no personal effects and there were no communication assistive devices, or anything indicating the resident required assistance to communicate with others. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed in section B0200 - Hearing, Speech, and Vision, the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper care to prevent the worsening of pressure wounds for two (Residents #74 and #12) of four residents sampled for pressure wounds. Findings included: An observation was conducted on 6/11/24 at 11:48 a.m. of Resident #74 lying in bed with his legs exposed crying out for assistance. He said his feet hurt and he needed help moving his leg. The resident was observed to have bandages on both heels and his feet were propped up on a plastic pack of disposable briefs. (Photographic evidence obtained with resident permission.) An observation and interview was conducted on 6/11/24 at 11:50 a.m. of Staff V, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) entering Resident #74's room and assisting to reposition his leg. Staff V confirmed the resident's heels were being offloaded with a pack of briefs. She said his pressure relieving boots were in the laundry so someone must have put those there. Staff V said the resident had wound care that morning and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor behaviors of side effects of psychotropic medications for two residents (Resident #36 and #77) out of the sampled five residents. Findings included: A review of the admission Record showed Resident #36 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of unspecified Dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, and other diagnoses to include schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Section I- Active Diagnoses of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed the resident had diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's Dementia, anxiety disorder, depression, and schizophrenia. The Order Review Report dated 06/01/24-06/30/24 revealed the following orders: 02/14/24 Cymbalta Oral Capsule Delayed Release Particles 60 MG- Give 1 capsule by mouth one time a day related to major depressive disorder; 03/06/24 Risperdal Oral Tablet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide food to accommodate preferences for one (Resident #59) out of six residents sampled for food. Findings included: On 06/09/24 at 11:34 a.m., Resident #59 reported the facility was no longer serving chef salads. She stated she needed to eat the chef salads because she wanted to lose weight. On 06/09/24 at 1:48 p.m., the resident was observed in the room with the meal tray in front of her. The tray consisted of mashed potatoes, green beans, and chicken broth. The resident reported she wanted to eat chef salads because she needed to lose weight. She carried a lot of weight and had pain in her back, she had diabetes, and needed to lose 40 pounds. She needed protein on her tray and was not getting any protein. She sent messages to speak with the Kitchen Manager, but she never came On 06/12/24 at 1:00 p.m., Resident #59 reported every day they gave her chicken broth, and it was too salty. They never gave her crackers with the soup. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or resident representative of the facility policy for bed-hold for three (#177, #280, and #427) of four residents reviewed for hospitalization. Findings included: 1. A review of the admission Record showed Resident #177 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Additional review of the Electronic Medical Record and the Resident's 'Hard Chart' revealed no 'Bed Hold Policy'. On 06/11/24 at 5:48 p.m., the Administrator reported they could not find a bed hold policy for Resident #177. A review of the admission Record showed Resident #177 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of a change in condition form revealed she was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] for altered mental status and did not return to the facility. Review of the medical record revealed no evidence of a bed-hold notice at the time of transfer. On 06/11/24 at 5:48 p.m., the Administrator confirmed they could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident council meeting concerns were documented and responded to for three of three months of Resident Council meetings and Food Committee meetings for five (Residents #2, #3, #5, #6 and anonymous resident) who reported concerns pertaining to food and inadequate staffing concerns of eleven sampled residents. Findings included: A review of the facility's Resident Council Meeting Minutes for 12/22/2023, 01/18/2024, and 02/22/2024 revealed the following: On 12/22/2023, for Nursing, No concerns at this time but turnover is a problem. No further issues with staffing and the Dietary subject was blank. On 01/18/2024, for the Nursing subject, it was blank. For Dietary: N/A (not applicable). On 02/22/2024, for the Nursing subject, it was blank. For Dietary: N/A. On 02/28/2024, the facility provided Food Committee notes, dated 11/03/2023, 12/08/2023, and 01/05/2023. The notes documented no concerns with food. On 02/28/2024 at 9:27 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #2, she stated for food, there is just not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, interviews and photographic evidence, the facility failed to ensure the provision of a therapeutic diet for one (Resident #2) of eleven sampled residents. Findings included: On 02/28/2024 at 9:27 a.m., Resident #2 was observed in her bed, eyes open, clean, groomed, and comfortable. She agreed to an interview. She stated she had resided in the facility for more than one year. She stated she ate her meals in her room. She confirmed she received three meals a day. She said the food taste was ok, there was just not enough. She stated, Yes, I have had weight loss. I eat independently. Sometimes not enough, sometimes I go hungry. A review of Resident #2's clinical record, the admission Record, documented an admission of 05/03/2023 with readmission of 02/19/2024. Her diagnosis information included: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and ulcerative colitis. A review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set, a 12/18/2023 PPS (Prospective Payment System) Part A Discharge assessment, Section C, documented a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident received a diet that met their dietary needs for four (#2, #7, #9, #10) of eleven sampled residents. Findings included: A review of the food committee meeting minutes for the past 6 months revealed that each meeting minutes recorded the date and time but did not record the names of the residents in attendance and did not record any concerns. An interview on 2/28/24 at 10:44 a.m. with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) revealed there was a food committee meeting the 1st Friday of each month. He said there were a variety of concerns, with ongoing concerns from some of the residents wanting double and triple portions. When asked why residents were asking for double and triple portions, the CDM reported Because people like to eat. He said they (the dietary department) try to accommodate resident's requests. Observations on 2/28/24 at 11:31 a.m., of the midday meal tray-line, revealed Staff A, [NAME] cutting the meat loaf into small squares using a flat spatula and then started plating each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0801 — isolated
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to employ dietary staff that displayed appropriate competencies to meet the resident's nutritional needs related to one (Staff A) of three cooks and the Certified Dietary Manager. Findings included: Review of the Dining Services Director/Account Manager job description revealed the following: -Provides leadership, support and guidance to ensure that food quality standards, inventory levels, food safety guidelines and customer service expectations are met. -Training, quality control and in-servicing staff to HCSG standards is an essential part of the Manager's responsibility and includes touring kitchen several times per day to assess work quality using QCIs for documentation purposes. Review of the [NAME] job description revealed the following: -Plates appropriate foods to resident meal trays. -Inspect special diet trays to ensure that the correct diet is served to the resident. -Adhere to menus and portion control standards, including those for special diets when preparing and serving meals. -Review tray card…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, related to sanitation, food storage, and equipment cleaning and maintenance. Findings included: An initial kitchen tour was conducted on 03/29/22 from 9:30 a.m. to 9:57 a.m. with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). The CDM stated there were two staff working today, The Dietary Manager in Training (MIT) and Staff R, Dietary Aide. During the tour observations were made of: Ceiling vents noted with dirt, debris in the cooking areas and the dish room. Walls were observed with dust, dirt, and stains. The kitchen floors were observed with food residue, dirt, dust, and debris. Tiles were noted missing by the dish machine with water collected in the hole. The kitchen equipment (stove) was noted with food spills and oil splatters. A vent was noted on the floor with caked-in food remains, dust, dirt, and debris. Kitchen equipment - dish machine, microwave, blender, and dough mixer were noted with brown matter on the surfaces. The CDM stated the kitchen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure dignity for one (Resident #73) of twelve residents that had indwelling urinary catheters. Findings included: On 3/29/22 at 12:29 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #73. The resident was lying in bed with the urinary drainage bag hanging from the bed frame facing the hallway. The drainage bag was not covered and held approximately 600 milliliter (mL) of concentrated yellow urine. An observation from the hallway was conducted on 3/30/22 at 4:57 p.m., of the resident sitting up in bed, eating dinner. The urinary drainage bag was observed hanging from the bed frame with yellow-colored urine in the bag. On 3/31/22 at 2:50 p.m., an observation was conducted from the hallway with Staff CC, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), escorting Resident #73's roommate from the room. Resident #73's urinary drainage bag held yellow-concentrated urine, while hanging from the bed frame. The staff member confirmed, from the hallway, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-01 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (Residents #73 and #97) of forty-three sampled residents were assessed for self-administration of medications. Findings included: 1. During an observation and interview, on 3/29/22 at 12:33 p.m., with Resident #73, Staff A, agency Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) sat a medication cup which contained a tablet of medication down on the over-bed table in reach of the resident then left the room. On 3/29/22 at 12:36 p.m., Resident #73 ingested the tablet identifying it as Lisinopril. On 3/29/22 at 12:46 p.m., Staff A reported that he had left Lisinopril with Resident #73. He said the resident was getting it after other hypertensive's due to the resident having low kidney function. A review was conducted on 3/29/22 at 12:55 p.m., of Resident #73's assessments. The review indicated that an assessment to evaluate the resident's ability to self administer medications was not completed. The review of Resident #73's Order Summary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-01 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure physician orders were in place for one (Resident #90) of one sampled resident with an orthopedic device. Findings included: During a facility tour on 03/29/22 at 10:00 a.m., Resident #90 was observed lying on her bed with an abductor pillow in place. Both legs were noted secured with the pillow. Resident #90 stated she wore the pillow all day. Resident #90 stated she was wearing it because she fell and broke her left hip. Resident #90 stated she would like to walk again. Resident #90 stated she did not like wearing the device but was looking forward to her ortho (orthopedic) appointment to evaluate the healing process. Review of an admission record for Resident #90 showed Resident #90 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of an encounter for orthopedic aftercare, displaced intertrochanteric fracture of unspecified femur and subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing. Review of Resident #90's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #97) out 43 sampled residents received care in accordance with professional standards of practices related to the staff not initiating written physician orders. Findings included: Resident #97 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The admission Record included diagnoses not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Acquired absence of left leg below knee, and End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). An observation was made of a telephone order flagged in the hard copy of Resident #97's clinical record. The telephone order included the following: - Start patient (pt) on a Vitamin A containing Multivitamin. - Restart Tramadol 50 milligram (mg) by mouth (po) every 6 hours as needed (q6 prn), mod-severe pain. - Wound care consult - Left (L) knee, - Start a triple antibiotic three times a day (TID) to pustular skin lesions x 4 weeks. The telephone order was written and signed by the physician on 3/25/22. The order did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #51) of three residents sampled for positioning received services and equipment to prevent further decrease in range of motion. Findings included: On 03/29/2022 at 12:05 p.m., Resident #51 was observed in his room lying in bed. He was interviewable and his left hand appeared contracted. He was not wearing a splint/brace on his left hand. However, a blue and gray [hook and loop] splint/brace was observed placed on the left side of the bed, on the dresser, and out of his reach. He stated he did not receive therapy services. Photographic evidence obtained. On 03/30/2022 at 12:05 p.m., Resident #51 was observed sitting in his wheelchair. He was noted not wearing his left-hand brace and it was again observed positioned on the left side of the bed on the dresser. It was observed in the same exact position as from the observations the day before (03/29/2022). Photographic evidence obtained. On 03/31/2022 at 10:02 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility 1. failed to ensure oxygen therapy equipment was stored in a sanitary manner for two (Residents #97 and #106) of three sampled residents and 2. failed to ensure physician orders were in place for the administration of oxygen therapy one (Resident #97) of three sampled residents Findings included: On 3/30/22 at 10:38 a.m., an observation was conducted of Resident #97's room, between Resident #97's bed and the privacy curtain was an oxygen concentrator with tubing and nasal cannula attached. The nasal cannula was observed lying on floor in front of the concentrator. The resident stated the cannula had probably been there for 2 weeks. The observation identified a Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine with mask was sitting on top of the bedside dresser beside the resident's bed. The CPAP mask was lying on top of machine, uncovered and undated. On 3/31/22 at 12:51 p.m., an observation was conducted of Resident #97's room with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility, 1. failed to ensure two (Residents #64 and #97) of six residents on dialysis, received a meal and/or snack during Dialysis and 2. failed to ensure one (Resident #97) received pre-dialysis, and post dialysis assessments, which is a standard of care consistent with professional practices. The findings included: 1. On 03/29/22 at 10:30 a.m., an observation and interview were conducted with Resident #64, who indicated the facility did not prepare snacks and/or meals to take to the dialysis center, and said, he was diabetic. Resident #64 revealed he would prefer the facility pack a snack and/or meal to keep his blood sugar stabilized during Hemodialysis. A record review for Resident #64 indicated he was initially admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included End Stage Renal Disease and Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. A review of the Order Summary Report for Resident #64 revealed an active order dated 12/28/2021 for Dialysis every Monday,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure medications were stored appropriately in four of seven medication carts and in one of three medication rooms. 2. On [DATE] at 10:18 a.m., the 100-low medication cart was observed unlocked and unattended while Staff BB, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was in a resident room. The staff member returned to the medication cart and confirmed the cart was unlocked and unattended. A review of the medication cart located on the 300-hall was conducted with Staff AA, Registered Nurse (RN). An unopened and undated bottle of Latanoprost 0.005% eye drops were observed in the cart. One of the labels on the bottle instructed that the medication Refrigerate Until Opened. The other label instructed staff to discard 42 days after opening. On [DATE] at 12:55 p.m., an observation was conducted with Staff M, LPN, of the 200-high medication cart. The bottom drawer was disorganized and cluttered, the drawer contained an aerosol can of Sanitizing Spray…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure garbage and refuse receptacles were covered, the garbage area was maintained in a sanitary manner and the garbage was disposed of in a timely manner. Findings included: During a facility tour on [DATE] at 9:59 a.m., an observation was made of the facility's trash area with a large size dumpster, noted overflowing with trash and refuse. The garbage was not in a covered receptacle. Piles of bags of garbage were observed on the ground next to the dumpster. (Photographic evidence was obtained) An interview was conducted on [DATE] at 9:59 a.m. with the Director of Maintenance (DOM). He stated their contract with the compactor had expired and that was why they rented a dumpster. He stated he had been calling the vendor and the vendor was not responding. Their agreement was that they would pick up every 7 days. The last time trash was picked up was on [DATE]. He expressed frustration with the process and said, Of course this is not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-01-29 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident #62) of 40 residents sampled was assessed to self-administer a respiratory (nebulizer) treatment. Findings included: On 01/28/21 at 08:01 a.m., Resident #62 was observed to be sitting in bed watching television, coloring a book, and wearing a nebulizer facemask. The resident's nebulizer machine was running and no staff were present in or around Resident #62's room. An interview was conducted with Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), immediately following the observation. Staff G indicated she performed everything she was told to do by someone who came to her earlier and did not recall the staff member's name. Staff G stated, No one told me I had to stay in the room. I never knew that. A record review of Physician Order dated 12/04/2020 for Resident #62 revealed the following order: Ipratropium Albuterol Solution 0.5-2.5 (3) MG/ML 3 ml inhale orally every 4 hours as needed for (Diagnosis) Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Continued review of the record revealed there was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-01-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and policy review the facility failed to provide respiratory care in accordance with standards of practice and the comprehensive plan of care for four (#30, #51, #62, #66) sampled residents out of 45 facility residents receiving respiratory treatment as evidenced by: 1) the improper storage of respiratory equipment for Resident #51, #62, and #66, and 2) Resident #30 not receiving administration and oversight of a C-PAP (Continuous positive airway pressure ) device. Findings included: 1. On 01/26/21 at 12:19 p.m., observation of Resident #62's room revealed a nebulizer facemask was located in the nightstand's first drawer. Resident #62 was interviewed about the placement of the equipment. Resident #62 indicated she placed the facemask in the top drawer and indicated that the staff don't have time to stay while the treatment is administered. She stated, They [referring to the nursing staff] have no time to do that, they are busy. Clinical record review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-01-29 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility did not ensure that one (#314) of 40 sampled residents had medically necessary appointments for the Cardiologist and the Ophthalmologist scheduled in a timely manner and followed through. Findings included: An interview with Resident #314 on 1/27/2021 at 9:30 a.m. revealed that he has been requesting the facility Social Worker to set up an appointment for him to see a Cardiologist as recommended by the dentist to have two of his teeth removed. Resident #314 stated that the facility has not made the appointment for him to see a Cardiologist. The resident stated that his eyesight has been getting progressively worse to the point where he was now legally blind, and he had been requesting a follow up appointment to see the eye doctor for quite a while, but no one was assisting him with the appointment. Medical record review for Resident #314 revealed an original admission date in 2019 and a re-admission date in November of 2020 with multiple diagnosis including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-01-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and policy review, the facility did not appropriately secure medications in six (200 Low, 200 High,100 High, Cart #1, Cart #2, 100 Low) of seven medication carts and failed to ensure controlled substances were stored in a permanently attached container in one (300 hall medication storage room) of two refrigerators sampled. Findings included: Review of facility provided policy titled, Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications, Biologicals, Syringes and Needles, with a revision date of 07/23/19 revealed under General Storage: 10. Facility should ensure that the medications and biologicals for each resident are stored in the containers in which they were originally received. On 01/29/21 at 10:21 a.m., an observation of the 200 Low Hall medication cart included a ½ and ¼ loose pieces of a tablet in second drawer from the top, and a white ¼ piece of white tablet in the drawer. Staff B Registered Nurse (RN), confirmed the presence of the unsecured tablets and pieces in both drawers. On 01/29/21 at 10:31 a.m., an observation of the 200 Hall High…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-01-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure that food items were labeled and dated in three (100, 200, and 300) of three nourishment refrigerators on the units. Findings included: On 1/26/21 at 10:08 a.m., a tour of the kitchen and nourishment areas was conducted with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). The nourishment refrigerator on the 200 unit was observed with a brown substance in the bottom of the refrigerator. There was a jar of open cheese that was not dated. There were also containers of unknown food in bags unlabeled and undated. The nourishment refrigerator on the 300 unit was observed with unknown food in bags unlabeled and undated. The nourishment refrigerator on the 100 unit was observed with one bag of food with room [ROOM NUMBER]B written on the bag with a black marker, but the food items were undated. The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) reported that the unlabeled/undated food in bags probably belonged to staff and confirmed that the items were not labeled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$45,660 in federal fines across 5 penalties.

  • $12,425 — penalty dated 2025-10-24
  • $12,425 — penalty dated 2025-10-24
  • $7,488 — penalty dated 2024-06-12
  • $3,882 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
  • $9,440 — penalty dated 2023-09-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIATA HEALTH GROUP — 50 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
The other 49 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspire At EvansFort Myers, FL 1 of 5Aviata At BenevaSarasota, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Big BendPerry, FL 1 of 5Aviata At FletcherTampa, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Palma Sola BayBradenton, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Saint LucieFort Pierce, FL 1 of 5Aviata At SarasotaSarasota, FL 1 of 5Aviata At SeminoleSeminole, FL 1 of 5Aviata At The BayTampa, FL 1 of 5Aviata At The PalmsPalm Harbor, FL 1 of 5Aviata At VeniceVenice, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Arbor SpringsOcala, FL 2 of 5Aviata At BradentonBradenton, FL 2 of 5Aviata At BrentwoodLecanto, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Colonial LakesWinter Garden, FL 2 of 5Aviata At EnglewoodEnglewood, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Grand OaksPalm Coast, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Green Cove SpringsGreen Cove Springs, FL 2 of 5Aviata At GreenacresGreen Acres, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Lakeside OaksDunedin, FL 2 of 5Aviata At OakfieldBrandon, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Santa BarbaraCape Coral, FL 2 of 5Aviata At South DaytonaSouth Daytona, FL 2 of 5Aviata At TallahasseeTallahassee, FL 2 of 5Aviata At The HarborSafety Harbor, FL 2 of 5Aviata At The Sea - PasadenaSouth Pasadena, FL 2 of 5Aviata At The Sea - Pompano BeachPompano Beach, FL 2 of 5Aviata At West Palm BeachWest Palm Beach, FL 2 of 5Aviata at Sand KeyClearwater, FL 3 of 5Aspire At Ridge HavenNew Port Richey, FL 3 of 5Aviata At BrooksvilleBrooksville, FL 3 of 5Aviata At Central ParkBrandon, FL 3 of 5Aviata At Coral BayWest Palm Beach, FL 3 of 5Aviata At CountrysidePalm Harbor, FL 3 of 5Aviata At JacksonvilleJacksonville, FL 3 of 5Aviata At North Fort MyersN Ft Myers, FL 3 of 5Aviata At RosewoodOrlando, FL 3 of 5Aviata At San JoseJacksonville, FL 3 of 5Aviata At St CloudSaint Cloud, FL 3 of 5Aviata At The Sea - Harbor BeachFort Lauderdale, FL

Showing 40 of 49; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BRYAN DAIRY PARENT LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2023
LARGO HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2023
FREUND, NOCHUMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2023
SRIVASTAVA, SUNITIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/10/2025
STEFFY, SPENCERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2025
DAGAN, AMITAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/04/2025
GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/04/2025
GOLDBERGER, FAIGYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/04/2025
HERSKOWITZ, ELIEZERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/04/2025
HERSKOWITZ, YAAKOVIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/04/2025
TRAVITSKY, AARONIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/04/2025
ASPIRE MGT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-23.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$77K
Related-party expense2% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 5%Other / private 19%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $77K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$340per resident / day
operating cost
$10,333per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$274per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 106116. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-06-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next