Aviata At Colonial Lakes
15204 W Colonial Dr, Winter Garden, FL 34787 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 180 certified beds · (407) 877-2394 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $23,136 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-16)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.6% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.9% | 5.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.7% | 4.6% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.3% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.4% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.5% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.4% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.7% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.0% | 10.5% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.6% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.2% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.6% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.4% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.07 | 2.13 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.28 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 53.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 69 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 7.4–16.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 53.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 52.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 40.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.7%CMS range 3.6–13.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.09 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 169.6 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.21 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-01-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure prescribed therapeutic diet of dysphagia mechanical soft consistency was followed for 1 of 8 sampled residents, (#1). This failure resulted in resident #1 consuming the wrong consistency snack, causing her to choke, and turn blue until she was transferred and admitted to the hospital Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and treated for acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. On 12/20/24 at 11:00 AM, resident #1, who was on a mechanical soft consistency diet, was allowed to consume a peanut butter and jelly (PB&J) sandwich from a tray of snacks left on a table in the dayroom by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A. The CNA was aware resident #1 was on a mechanical soft diet but allowed the resident to eat the sandwich because she had seen her eat bread in the past. The CNA recalled she was called back into the dayroom by CNA B who told her resident #1 did not look good. She said resident #1 was sitting up in a chair with her mouth open and tongue sticking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) had the knowledge, skill sets, and competencies to provide foods/snacks to residents in accordance with their plan of care and physician orders for 1 of 8 sampled residents, (#1). This failure resulted in the resident being allowed to consume the wrong consistency snack which resulted in the resident choking and being transferred to a higher level of care where she was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and treated for acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. On 12/20/24 at 11:00 AM, resident #1, who was on a mechanical soft consistency diet, was allowed to consume a peanut butter and jelly (PB&J) sandwich from a tray of snacks left on a table in the dayroom by CNA A. The CNA was aware resident #1 was on a mechanical soft diet but allowed the resident to eat the sandwich because she had seen her eat bread in the past. The CNA recalled she was called back into the dayroom by CNA B who told her resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to privacy for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for privacy, out of a total sample of 52, (#90 and #159).Findings: 1. Resident #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure, weakness, anxiety and diabetes. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment with assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/9/26 revealed resident #90 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated she was cognitively intact. Resident #90 had impairment to one side of her upper extremities and required substantial/maximal assistance for personal hygiene. On 3/31/26 at 9:18 AM, resident #90 was observed in her bed with the head of bed elevated. She stated the middle curtain which divides the space between the A and B beds in the room was too narrow and did not provide privacy during care. The curtain was noted to be fully extended with spaces on either side which exposed the head…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations interviews and record review, the facility failed to administer medication as ordered by the physician for 1 out of 3 residents sampled for pain management of a total sample of 52 (#104). Findings:Resident #104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included quadriplegia, muscle weakness, muscle spasm chronic pain due to trauma and unspecified injury at unspecified level of cervical spinal cord.Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #104 was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status score (BIMS) of 15 out of 15. The MDS also revealed the resident had pain that interfered with sleep occasionally.On 3/30/26 at 12:13 PM resident #104 was lying in bed and stated that his pain was not controlled. He said that the medication he received doesn't seem to relieve his pain and he had told facility staff of his concern.A review of the March 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed orders for Dantrium oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses were knowledgeable and demonstrated competency to provide care and services per standards of care for a medication administration for 1 of 6 resident reviewed during observation of medication administration, out of a total sample of 52 residents (186). Findings:Resident #186 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus. Severe dementia, major depressive disorder, brief psychotic disorder, seizures, hypertension, dysphagia, and adult failure to thrive.On 3/31/26 at 8:37 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B, prepared resident #186's scheduled medications at her medication cart. She poured Colace 100 milligrams (mg), Lamotrigine 25mg, Losartan 100mg, Multi-vitamin 1 tablet, Tradjenta 5mg, Zinc 50mg and 2 tablets of Metformin 500mg. LPN B then placed the medicine into a clear sleeve and crushed the medication. LPN B then stated that she will ask 'if she wants it in her food or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete medical records for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for mood and behavior, of a total sample 52 residents, (#31).Findings:Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction, autistic disorder, pseudobulbar affect, gender identity disorder, major depressive disorder, mild cognitive impairment, mild neurocognitive disorder due to know physiological condition with behavioral disturbance, mood disorder, anxiety disorder and noncompliance with medical treatment and regimen due to unspecified reason. A review of the resident's care plan revealed resident #31 identified as transgender and prefers she/her pronouns. Resident #31 had a care plan for behaviors related to refusing medications, refusing care, crawling on the floor, cursing out staff, accusatory behaviors such as claiming staff stealing her items and attention seeking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-30 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Midline Intravenous (IV) dressing care was completed as per professional standards for 1 of 1 resident of a total sample of 4 residents, (#1).Resident #1, an [AGE] year-old female was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included abscess left great toe, cerebral infarction (stroke), type 2 diabetes, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, elevated white blood cell count and lymphedema. A Midline Catheter is a thin, flexible tube placed into a vein in the arm. The catheter is 8-10 centimeters long and can stay in the arm for up to 29 days. This allows patients to get IV (intravenous) medicines and have blood samples drawn. The catheter is placed by a trained nurse. (retrieved on 10/4/25 at 3:57 PM from https://patient.uwhealth.org/healthfacts).On 9/30/25 at 12:30 PM, resident #1 was observed lying in recliner type chair in her room. The 200 Unit Manager was observed doing wound care to the resident #1's left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan with measurable goals and interventions for a vulnerable resident with behaviors that posed a risk to their safety, (#1). Findings: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, unspecified psychosis, need for assistance with personal care, dysphagia oropharyngeal phase, history of stroke, and unspecified dementia. Dysphagia oropharyngeal phase is a term to describe swallowing problems that occur in the mouth or throat, usually from impaired muscle function or sensory changes, (retrieved on 1/27/25 from www.uclahealth.org). Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with reference date 9/30/24 revealed she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10 out of 15, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. She had no upper or lower extremity limitations, was independent for eating, and required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately document, investigate, follow up, and promptly resolve grievances for 1 of 3 sampled residents, (#1). Findings: Resident #1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type II diabetes, chronic kidney disease stage III, major depressive disorder, vascular dementia with agitation, hemiplegia/hemiparesis following stroke affecting the right dominant side, and persistent mood disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 5 out of 15 which indicated severely impaired cognition. The assessment revealed she required substantial to maximum assistance for toileting, dressing, and personal hygiene. On 12/4/24 at 12:35 PM, a telephone interview with resident #1's daughter confirmed that she was the Power of Attorney (POA) and visited her mother daily. She said that she had been having issues with her mother's missing items for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 sampled residents, (#1). Findings: Resident #1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital with new diagnoses that included urinary tract infection (UTI), need for assistance with personal care, and muscle weakness. She also had a past medical history of type II diabetes, chronic kidney disease stage III, major depressive disorder, vascular dementia with agitation, and persistent mood disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed that resident #1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 5 out of 15 which indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. The assessment revealed she required substantial to maximum assistance for toileting, dressing, and personal hygiene. On 12/04/24 at 12:35 PM, in a telephone interview, resident #1's daughter confirmed at she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the potential spread of infection by not ensuring Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were followed by not wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for urinary catheter (#3), failed to identify the type of precaution staff needed to follow for EBP for 2 of 5 residents, (#3 and #12) and failed to follow manufacturer's guidelines for cleaning and disinfection of shared glucose meters for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for blood sugar monitoring (#11) of a total sample of 20 residents. Findings: 1. On 11/19/2024 at 9:44 AM, resident #3 was resting in bed. Urinary catheter tubing was noted near the siderail of the resident's bed. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) E was in the room at the time and confirmed the resident had a urinary catheter. The resident's room door did not have any signage to indicate type of precautions or the required PPE that staff needed for residents with urinary catheters. On 11/19/2024 at 3:55 PM, resident #3 was observed lying in bed and had indwelling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0778 — isolatedHelp the resident make transportation arrangements to and from radiology services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to make transportation arrangements for a resident to a specialty medical care appointment, for 1 of 6 sampled residents, (#1). Review of resident #1's record revealed an admission date of 06/14/24. His diagnoses included: cardiomyopathy, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, idiopathic progressive neuropathy, chronic pain syndrome, and acquired absence of left leg below the knee. Review of resident #1's Minimum Data Set Significant Change in Condition assessment dated [DATE] indicated his Brief Interview for Mental Status Summary Score was 15, the highest score value, which suggested the resident is cognitively intact. Review of Resident #1's medical record under Order Details revealed an order dated 07/23/24 at 2:41 PM, which read resident #1 had a neurology appointment scheduled for 09/04/24 at 1:00 PM. The order included a direction for [sic] transportation service to be used for the transportation and for them to arrive 15 minutes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 22 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store raw foods (e.g., produce) in a manner to reduce the risk of contamination of ready-to-eat foods and failed to store other food items by sealing, labeling and dating when opened. The facility also failed to ensure dishes and flatware were cleaned and stored under sanitary conditions and equipment was clean and in safe working order. These issues had the potential to negatively affect the health of 154 of the 166 residents in the facility. Findings: On 07/15/24 at 9:55 AM, surveyors entered the kitchen for the initial tour accompanied by the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). In the walk-in refrigerator, liquid was dripping from the refrigerator condenser onto raw produce including tomatoes, 6 vented plastic containers of strawberries, and other boxes of fresh produce. An approximately 18 inch by 18-inch puddle as well as most of the floor was wet. The CDM stated it was not sanitary to have liquid from a piece of equipment dripping onto food items, but she didn't have anywhere else to put the produce. The surveyors pointed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the walk-in refrigerator in safe operating condition for all mechanical and electrical equipment. This issue had the potential to negatively affect the health of 154 of the 166 residents in the facility who received food and nutrition by mouth. Findings: On 07/15/24 at 9:55 AM, during the initial kitchen tour with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), it was noted the walk-in refrigerator's condenser was leaking liquid onto food products including raw produce. Most of the floor was wet along with a puddle measured approximately 18 inches by 18 inches. The CDM stated they dry mopped the walk-in floor regularly to remove liquid from it. She stated the condenser had been dripping liquid for more than 6 months. The CDM demonstrated the floor underneath the condenser was soft and boggy from the moisture when it dipped down as she jumped on it. She stated she had informed the Maintenance Department and Administration about the leak. The facility's food service equipment policy with revision date of September…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain clean and soiled utility rooms to ensure proper storage of contaminated and clean linens, and failed to maintain adequate handwashing supplies on 2 of 2 units, out of a total of 3 units, to prevent cross contamination, and exposure to blood-borne pathogens and infectious microorganisms according to established guidelines. Findings: The Infection Prevention and Control Program policy revised 10/18 read, An infection prevention and control program is established and maintained to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections .Coordination and Oversight .The infection prevention and control program is coordinated and overseen by an infection prevention specialist [infection preventionist] .Important facets of infection prevention include .educating staff and ensuring that they adhere to proper techniques and procedures . On 7/16/24 at 10:51 AM, interview and observations were conducted with the Infection Preventionist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct a medication self-administration assessment to ensure safety for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for self-administration of medications, out of a total sample of 59 residents, (#321). Findings: Resident #321 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a nondisplaced zone 1 fracture of the sacrum, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and depression. Review of the Medical Certification for Medicaid Long-Term Care Services and Patient Transfer Form (3008) dated 7/11/24 revealed the resident's mental cognitive status as alert, oriented, and followed instructions. On 7/15/24 at 03:19 PM, resident #321 was observed lying in bed with her son standing beside her. A 1.5-ounce Major Deep-sea Saline nasal moisturizing spray, Tylenol PM, Magnesium 400 milligrams (mg), and Cranberry extract 500 mg were on the resident's nightstand. Resident #321 stated she used the nasal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review or revise the individualized fall plan of care to include a new intervention after every fall for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for care plans, from a total sample of 59 residents, (#62). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #62 was admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included history of falls, difficulty walking, paranoid schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, and dementia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set with Assessment Reference Date 6/29/24 noted the resident scored 10 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated she was cognitively impaired. The assessment noted the resident required significant/maximum staff assistance to complete Activities of Daily Living. The comprehensive fall care plan included focus items for an actual fall with a goal that resident #62 would resume usual activities and minimize the risk of further incident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a timely appointment for vision care and services for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed for vision and hearing, of a total sample of 59 residents, (#156). Findings: Resident #156 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital with diagnoses including hypoglycemia, adjustment disorder, anxiety disorder, and symbolic dysfunctions. Resident #156's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a reference date of 3/27/24 revealed the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam which indicated he was not cognitively impaired. The MDS assessment indicated resident #156 had adequate vision and did not exhibit behavior symptoms or rejection of care necessary to achieve the resident's goals for health and well-being. Resident #156's Order Summary Report showed the resident had an order on 4/19/24 for Optometry/Ophthalmology as needed and an Ophthalmology Appointment order was placed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide proof of consent, refusal, or medical contraindication for Pneumococcal vaccine for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations, (#5, and #129). Findings: 1. Resident #105, a [AGE] year-old male was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of protein calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, malignant neoplasm of prostate, anemia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of resident #105's medical record on 7/17/24 revealed no documentation of consents, refusal, or medical contraindication for the Pneumococcal vaccine. 2. Resident #129, a [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of muscle weakness, type 2 diabetes, dysphagia, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, syncope and collapse. Review of resident #129's medical record on 7/17/24 revealed no documentation of consent, refusal, or medical contraindication for the Pneumococcal vaccine. On 7/17/24 at 4:42 PM, the Regional Registered Nurse (RN)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-18 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident funds were accessible on weekends for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for personal funds of a total sample of 68 residents, (#32). Findings: Review of resident #32's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included stroke with left side weakness and paralysis, contracture of the left knee and hip, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set quarterly assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 6/9/22 revealed resident #32 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 which indicated he was cognitively intact. On 8/15/22 at 1:32 PM, resident #32 stated he requested a withdrawal of $50.00 from his account on the previous weekend but had not received it. He indicated he requested access to his funds from staff members but no one got back to him. On 8/17/22 at 3:49 PM, the Business Office Manager (BOM) explained residents could request money from their personal funds account for up to $50.00 in cash…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-18 · tag F0635 — patternProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain physician orders upon admission to address wound care for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, of a total sample of 68 residents, (#343). Findings: Review of resident #343's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, adult failure to thrive, and metabolic encephalopathy. Review of the Nursing admission Assessment form dated 8/10/22 revealed the resident was was alert, her memory was okay, and she was oriented to person, place, and time. The form noted the resident had wounds to left buttock and left heel. Review of the physician progress note dated 8/11/22 at 11:53 AM, showed the resident had sacral and left heel ulcers. A care plan dated 8/10/22 and revised 8/17/22 for risk of skin breakdown, related to decreased mobility included interventions for staff to follow facility protocols and treatment as ordered by the physician and Wound Doctor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure potentially hazardous foods were at a cold holding temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit, or below, to prevent foodborne illness. Findings: Review of the facility lunch menu on 8/17/22, revealed residents had a choice between egg salad sandwich or ham sandwich, creamy dill macaroni salad or potato chips, mandarin oranges, country tomato salad or marinated cucumber and onion salad. On 8/17/22 at 11:35 AM, the lunch tray line was observed and noted one cook, one dietary aide and the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) in the vicinity of the tray line. [NAME] B checked the temperatures of the cold food items on the holding table with the facility's digital, bayonet style thermometer. She reported the egg salad had a holding temperature of 43.6 degrees Fahrenheit, the macaroni salad had a hold temperature of 43.7 degrees Fahrenheit, the pureed macaroni salad had a holding temperature of 42.3 degrees Fahrenheit, the pureed egg salad had a temperature of 41.6 degrees Fahrenheit and the pureed green bean salad had a holding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess and complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment Section F-preferences for customary routine and activities for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for activities of a total sample of 68 residents, (#138). Findings: Clinical record review revealed resident #138 was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included, metabolic encephalopathy, Alzheimer's disease, transient ischemic attack, dementia, and contracture of the right and left hip, and right knee. The resident's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 8/02/22 revealed the resident was rarely/never understood. Assessment for Section F0500 Interview for Activity Preferences indicated it was very important for the resident to have books, newspaper, magazines to read, to do things with groups of people, to do favorite activities, to go outside to get fresh air when the weather is good,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-18 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for PASRR of a total sample of 68 residents, (#36). Findings: Review of resident #36's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizophrenia, anxiety, depression, and mood disorder. The resident's PASRR form was dated 7/21/20, which reflected a completion date of four months after the resident was admitted to the facility. On 8/18/22 at 11:10 AM, the Social Services Director said, My process is to review the PASRR for completeness and accuracy. I was not here when the resident was admitted and I cannot speak for the previous person. She explained the PASRR form should have been completed prior to resident #36's admission. On 8/18/22 at 11:21 AM, the Corporate Admissions Director stated PASRR forms should be reviewed by facility staff prior to resident's admission. She stated if a resident was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-18 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered baseline care plan, that addressed care and services, and failed to provide a summary to the resident and resident representative within 48 hours for 2 of 4 newly admitted residents reviewed for baseline careplans of a total sample of 68 residents, (#108, #343). Findings: 1. Resident #108 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of chronic kidney disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis right dominant side, diabetes, and heart failure. The resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 5 out of 15 which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. The assessment noted the resident required extensive assistance from staff with activities of daily living, was occasionally incontinent of bladder and bowel, and was not steady moving from seated to standing position, walking or moving on or off the toilet. Review of the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for activities for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for activities, (#138), and failed to update a care plan to reflect the residents' preferences and choices for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for choices in a total sample of 68 residents, (#121). Findings: 1. Review of the resident #138's medical record noted she was 64-years-old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy, Alzheimer's disease, transient ischemic attack, dementia, and contractures of the right and left hips, and right knee. The resident's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/02/22 revealed the resident was rarely/never understood. Assessment for Section F0500 Interview for Activity Preferences indicated it was very important for the resident to have books, newspapers, magazines to read, to do things with groups of people, to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed, revised, and individualized, for falls for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for falls out of a total sample of 68 residents, (#108). Findings: 1. Resident #108 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia, hemiparesis, and heart failure. The resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 5 out of 15 which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. The assessment identified the resident required extensive assistance of one staff person with activities of daily living, was occasionally incontinent of bladder and bowel, not steady moving from seated to standing position, and walking or moving on or off the toilet. It noted the resident had history of falls since admission, and one fall in the facility with no injury. Review of the medical record showed a care plan initiated 7/18/22 with revision date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide oral care for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) of a total sample of 68 residents, (#12). Findings: Review of resident #12's medical record noted he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included apraxia, schizophrenia, contracture, dementia, and gastrostomy. Review of the physician orders revealed the resident was to have nothing by mouth and had orders for tube feedings, Glucerna 1.5 at 60 milliliters/hour for 22 hours per day. The resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/25/22 revealed the resident's cognition was severely impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3/15. The assessment indicated the resident was totally dependent on staff for bed mobility, dressing, eating, and personal hygiene, and had functional limitation in range of motion on one side of his upper extremity, and on both sides of his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were implemented for compression stockings for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for edema, of a total sample of 68 residents, (#114). Findings: Review of resident #114's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, chronic peripheral venous insufficiency, and generalized edema. Review of the the resident's physician orders revealed an order dated 7/14/22 that read, TED hose: Nursing to assist patient with don/doff of TED hose on BLE [bilateral lower extremities], size 2 XL thigh high at all times for edema. 'TED hose are long, tight fitting stockings that place mild static pressure on the legs to prevent blood from clotting. [Retrieved from-health. com 8/26/22] On 8/16/22 at 11:02 AM, resident #114 explained he had edema to his thigh, and approximately three weeks ago, the physician ordered thigh high support stockings for him. He…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide bilateral palm guards and left elbow brace per physician orders to prevent further decrease in range of motion (ROM) for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for limited ROM of a total sample of 68 residents, (#139). Findings: Review of resident #139's clinical record noted she was admitted to the facility initially on 7/22/05, with her most recent readmission on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included, injury of head, quadriplegia, spinal stenosis, dementia, and drug induced subacute dyskinesia. Review of the Functional Maintenance Program document with effective date 4/28/22 indicated the resident should have Bilateral Palm guards for 4-6 hours as tolerated. Progress note on 7/22/22 read, Continues on restorative nursing program for activity tolerance, strengthening, splinting .Resident d/c [discharged ] from restorative to have therapy eval.[evaluation] The resident's physician's order dated 5/16/22 read, bilateral upper extremities palmar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication, coordination and collaboration between the nursing home and the dialysis center for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis of a total sample of 68 residents, (#136). Findings: Resident #136 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], readmitted [DATE] and 8/06/22 with diagnoses including dysphagia, end stage renal disease (ESRD), dependence on renal dialysis, encephalopathy and heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set admission assessment with assessment reference date 8/04/22 revealed resident #136 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 4 which indicated he had severe cognitive impairment. He required extensive to total assistance for activities of daily living and did not reject care. Review of resident #136's medical record revealed a physician order dated 8/01/22 for hemodialysis at an outside facility on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays at 12:45 PM. Hemodialysis is a procedure where a dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the accurate dosage of insulin was administered as per physician's orders, and failed to ensure the medication was administered as scheduled to 1 of 7 residents observed for medication administration observation of a total sample of 68 residents, (#9). Findings: Review of resident #9's clinical record showed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes type II with neuropathy, and long-term use of insulin. On 8/16/22 between 10:00 AM-10:05 AM, during medication administration observation with Registered Nurse (RN) H, resident #9's blood glucose was monitored at 360 milligram/deciliter (mg/dL). On 08/16/22 at approximately 10:19 AM, RN H withdrew 15 units of insulin Lispro from a multi-dose vial and administered the insulin in the resident's upper right arm. In an interview conducted with resident #9 immediately after the administration of the insulin, the resident stated he had already eaten breakfast. RN H…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document physician's order for thigh high compression hose for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for edema, of a total sample of 68 residents, (#114). Findings: Review of resident #114's clinical record noted he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, chronic peripheral venous insufficiency, and generalized edema. Review of the physician's orders for resident #114 revealed an order dated 7/14/22 read, TED hose: Nursing to assist patient with don/doff of TED hose on BLE [bilateral lower extremities], size 2 XL thigh high at all times for edema. 'TED hose are long, tight fitting stockings that place mild static pressure on the legs to prevent blood from clotting. [Retrieved from-health. com 8/26/22]. On 8/16/22 at 11:02 AM, resident #114 stated he had edema of his thigh, and approximately three weeks ago, the physician ordered thigh high support stockings for him. He said he has not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices to prevent cross contamination during wound care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers of a total sample of 68 residents, (#129). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #129 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include vascular dementia, and atrial fibrillation. The physician orders for resident #129 included consult Infectious Disease specialist for left heel wound; obtain an x-ray of the left heel regarding an ulcer related to osteomyelitis or bone infection; and give antibiotics, Augmentin 875-125 milligrams (mg) tablet twice a day and Doxycycline 100 mg twice a day for left heel wound. The physician's wound treatment order directed nurses to apply a non-sting skin protectant and a protective dressing to the left heel daily. On 8/18/22 at 10:15 AM, during resident's wound care observation, Licensed Practical Nurse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$23,136 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $8,492 — penalty dated 2025-01-16
- $8,492 — penalty dated 2025-01-16
- $6,152 — penalty dated 2024-11-21
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVIATA HEALTH GROUP — 50 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.1 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 49 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 49; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| WEST COLONIAL PARENT LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/01/2023 |
| COLONIAL GARDEN HOLDCO LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/01/2023 |
| FREUND, NOCHUM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2023 |
| FOSTER, DANIEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/09/2025 |
| MISHRA, ABHISHEK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2023 |
| DAGAN, AMITAI | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/28/2025 |
| GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/28/2025 |
| GOLDBERGER, FAIGY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/28/2025 |
| HERSKOWITZ, ELIEZER | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/28/2025 |
| HERSKOWITZ, YAAKOV | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/28/2025 |
| TRAVITSKY, AARON | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/28/2025 |
| ASPIRE MGT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $92K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105440. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.