No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Aviata At The Sea - Harbor Beach

1615 Miami Rd, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 59 certified beds · (954) 523-5673 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (954) 523-5673 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited May 2024
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (26% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1700 S Federal Hwy · (800) 746-7287 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1700 S Federal Hwy · (954) 462-8185 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1083 SE 17th St · (954) 523-1603 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1817 Miami Rd · (954) 828-7275 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
201 SE 13th St · (954) 661-9523

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.4%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight12.2%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.3%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%4.6%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.6%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.0%9.5%16.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.6%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.3%4.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.1%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.9%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.7%79.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.852.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.551.151.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
64.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.65U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.28hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.33hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 64.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.65 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 47% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 6.8–18.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge64.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.241.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.58
RN hours/ resident / day
0.65
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.01
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.24
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
26.2%
Total nursing turnover
46.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 56.7 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-11)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-09)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and sanitary conditions, and to prevent foodborne illnesses, during 2 of 2 tours in the central kitchen. The findings included: A review of the Food Safety Guide dated September 19, 2023, showed that raw chicken should be in the refrigerator for 1 to 2 days https://www.foodsafety.gov/food-safety-charts/cold-food-storage-charts.In a tour of the central kitchen conducted on 09/08/2025 at 9:08 AM, accompanied by the food service manager, the following issues were noted:The reach in freezer was noted with a pack of frozen meat patties that were not labeled and did not have the date of when the frozen meat patties were placed in the freezer, nor did they have an expiration date.The reach in freezer was noted with a bag of frozen turkey patties that was labeled but did not have the date of when the turkey patties were placed in the freezer, nor did it have an expiration date.The reach-in freezer was noted with three large…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and records review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for 3 of 25 sample residents (Resident #1, Resident #17 and Resident #22).The findings included:1. On 09/08/2025 at 10:48 AM, it was observed that a call light in the resident's room was attached to the back of Resident #22's bed's headboard. The observation prompted an interview with Resident #22 who reported through gestural confirmation, because of his tracheostomy, that he wanted to use the call light, but he could not reach it. Resident #22 affirmatively nodded, it was not the first time this situation occurred, when asked if that was the first time it had happened. To ensure that Resident #22 could use his hands, the Assistant Nurse Manager was immediately called to the room and was asked to hand the call light to Resident #22 and to have him press on it to activate it. Resident #22 successfully activated the call light.Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was diagnosed with:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their own policy regarding grooming for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for 1 of 21 sampled residents (Resident #40). The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Grooming Activities, revised on 03/19/19, documented the following:o Grooming activities are provided to assist residents in meeting their physical needs as well as self-esteem needs.o Grooming activities shall be offered daily.o Grooming activities shall include, but not limited to: Shaving Combing hair Nail careA record review documented Resident # 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Displaced Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Left Femur, and Muscle Weakness.An electronic record review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, under Section C of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), revealed a score of 13 indicating Resident #40 had no cognitive impairment.A review of the nursing care plan dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow fall interventions and failed to complete a post-fall assessment for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #23).The findings included:A record review revealed that Resident #23 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Anemia and Muscle Weakness. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. An order dated 09/02/2025 for bilateral floor mats for safety.A review of the facility's policy titled Fall Management dated 07/29/2019 showed the following: the purpose of this policy is to identify residents at risk for falls and to establish and modify interventions to decrease the risk of future falls and minimize the potential for a resulting injury. Initiate post-fall documentation every shift for 72 hours. In an observation conducted on 09/08/25 at 11:00 AM, Resident #23 was noted in the bed with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to attain weekly weights and identify significant weight loss in a timely manner for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #55). The findings included:A review of the facility's policy titled Weighing the Resident, revised on 10/04/2021, showed the following: When there is a significant variance from the previous recorded weight, the scale should be rebalanced and the resident reweighted, and a licensed nurse should validate. It further showed to record the weight and alert the nurse to any significant change. A chart review revealed Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Anemia, Dementia, and Dysphagia. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed Resident #55 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which is low to moderate cognitive impairment. In an observation conducted on 09/08/2025 at 12:13 PM in the main dining area, Resident #55 was eating her lunch meal. Further observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow the professional standards for gastrotomy tube (G-tube) care and management for 2 out of 2 sampled residents (Resident #22 and Resident #52). The findings included: A review of a facility's policy titled, Medication Administration via Enteral Tube, with a revision date of 03/06/19, documented the following: Place disposable under pad or towel around the area of tube to limit spillage. Check for residual. Check for placement. Aspirate gently by pulling back on plunger of syringe plunger to check for stomach contents.1) Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Anoxic Brain Damage, Candidiasis, and Quadriplegia.A review of the recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], under section C of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), documented that it was disabled.An electronic review of physician orders dated 08/19/25 revealed the following: Enteral feed every shift. Check for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow the professional standards of tracheostomy care and management for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident # 22). The findings included:A record review of the facility's policy titled, Tracheostomy Care, with a revision date of 08/2013, documented the following:Assess respiratory distress.a. Measure resident's oxygen saturation with pulse oximeter.b. Listen to lung sounds with stethoscope.c. Observe for asymmetrical chest expansion.A record review revealed Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Anoxic Brain Damage, Candidiasis, Quadriplegia and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Hypercapnia.An electronic review of recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] under Section C, revealed that the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was disabled.A tracheostomy care observation was conducted on [DATE] at 10:10 AM with Staff I, Registered Nurse (RN) and Staff J, Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility also failed to follow a physician order for a seizure medication and failed to follow the professional standards of nursing practice related to the rights of medication administration: the right time for 1 of 25 sampled residents (Resident # 26). The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Oral Administration of Medication, with a revision date of 08/15/19, documented to review Physician's order (1).According to National Institute of Health, Nurses have a unique role and responsibility in medication administration, in that they are frequently the final person to check to see that the medication is correctly prescribed and dispensed before administration. In upholding patient safety, the 'five R's' of medication administration are followed.A guiding principle for one of the five rights is of the right time. The right time is ensuring that medications should be prescribed as closely to the time as possible, and nurses should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow the professional standards of practice related to keeping the medication storage room free of facility staff's personal belongings. The facility also failed to ensure medications and supplies are properly stored for 1 of 21 sampled residents (Resident #53). The findings included:A review of facility's policy titled, Medication Supply Storage and Medication Disposal, with an effective date of 11/30/14, documented the following (ff): Central storage of medications is required for prescriptions, prescribed over -the counter medications and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Will be kept in a locked area, in their original labeled container and may not be removed more than 2 hours prior to scheduled administration. 1) During a tour of the medication storage room with Staff G, Registered Nurse (RN) on 09/09/25 at 10:06 AM, it revealed a big black unzipped purse sitting on the counter next to bags of residents' antibiotics.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow the menus and preferences of 3 out of 3 residents observed during dining observations (Resident #34, Resident #1, and Resident #10). The findings included:1. A chart review revealed that Resident #34 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dysphagia and anemia. Magic cup (nutritional supplements) two times a day for lunch and dinner was ordered on 05/22/2025.The nutrition assessment dated [DATE] showed the following: Resident #34's Body Mass Index (BMI) was low for age at 16.8, and that weight gain was beneficial to the Resident. Recommendations were made for a large portion of protein with all meals and Magic cup supplements twice a day.In an observation conducted on 09/08/25 at 12:18 PM in the main dining room, Resident #34 was eating the lunch meal. Resident #34's meal ticket showed the following: a pureed diet, large entree portions, pureed broccoli florets, pureed dinner roll, pureed sour cream, orange cake, and a Magic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and chart review, the facility failed to provide food in a form to meet the needs of 2 of 2 residents on the Dysphagia advanced diet (Resident #55 and Resident #10). This has the potential to affect three residents on a Dysphagia advanced diet.The findings included:A review of the National Dysphagia Diet Levels was provided by the Kitchen Manager. The following was noted: Level 3 Dysphagia advance is characterized by a mechanical soft texture, such as moistened ground meats and fork-mashable fruits and vegetables. A chart review revealed that Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia and Dysphagia following a Cerebrovascular Disease. In an observation conducted on 09/08/2025 at 12:13 PM in the main dining area, Resident #55 was eating her lunch meal. The meal ticket was noted as follows: Dysphagia advanced diet, chopped roasted broccoli florets, chopped ground bruschetta chicken, parmesan noodles, dinner roll, sour cream, orange cake, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly in 2 of 2 observations. The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Solid Waste Management dated 11/30/2014 showed the following: solid waste shall be handled and disposed of in a manner that shall ensure a safe and sanitary facility environment. An observation was conducted on 09/08/25 at 8:39 AM outside the main dumpster. Two large blue dumpsters were partially open, with numerous bags of garbage/trash broken open and spilling their contents outside the dumpsters. Further observation showed garbage, trash, medication containers, and medical waste products on top of the blue dumpsters. Further observations showed protective Equipment, gloves, and surgical masks were noted all around the garbage area. On 09/09/25 at 8:45 AM, an observation was conducted in the outside dumpster area, where one blue dumpster was found to be unsealed and contained garbage bags, food boxes, disposable plates, and other trash. The area around the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 2 of 15 EBP residents (Resident #4 and Resident #22). The findings included: According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Enhanced Barrier Precautions sign post included the following: Everyone must clean their hands, including when both entering and leaving the room: Providers and Staff must also wear gloves and a gown for the following: high-contact care resident care activities, dressing, bathing-showering, transferring, changing linens, providing hygiene, changing briefs or assisting with toileting: Device care or use; central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy: Wound care with any skin opening requiring a dressing. https://www.cdc.gov/long-term-care facilities/media/pdfs/ 1) A record review documented Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that it followed physician's order for Intravenous (IV) antibiotic administration for 1 of 3 sampled residents observed, Resident #1. The findings included: Record review of the facility policy and procedure titled Physician's Orders provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) revised 03/03/21 documented in the Policy Statement: The center will ensure that Physician's orders are appropriately and timely documented in the medical record. Procedure: admission Orders: Information received from the referring facility or agency to be reviewed, verified with the physician and transcribed to the electronic medical record .Routine Orders: A nurse may accept a telephone order from the Physician, Physician Assistant or Nurse Practitioner .For pharmacy orders, the nurse will notify the pharmacy per pharmacy policy by telephoning, faxing or completing the order electronically .to maintain an accurate medical record. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 16 of 28 resident rooms, 1 of 2 community shower rooms, main dining room, ice machine room, and 1 of 1 clean linen storage rooms. The findings included: 1) During the observation of the commercial ice machine room which is located in a room just off the main dining room on 05/07/24 at 1 PM accompanied with the Corporate Housekeeping Director (CHD). The floor of the entire room was heavily soiled and stained black in color. Further noted the floor area was missing around the commercial ice machine and there was a large gap under the exit door to the outside that could potentially allow entrance of pests into the facility. Photographic Evidence Obtained. 2) During the observation of the facility's laundry room department on 05/07/24 at 2 PM and on 05/08/24 at 2 PM, accompanied with the facility's Corporate Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, 5 of 14 sampled residents (Resident #4, Resident #14, Resident #19, Resident # 30, and Resident # 33) were noted to be treated in an undignified manner by the facility. The findings included: 1) On 05/06/24 at 1:44 PM, Resident #14 was observed sitting in a wheelchair appropriately dressed in his personal attire. Resident #14's feeding formula was infusing via a tube. The privacy curtain dividing Resident #14 from his roommate, who also was observed in bed eating lunch, was fully opened. Resident #14 could easily see Resident #33's meal and did see Resident #33 eating his lunch. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #14 diagnoses included: Cerebral Infarction and Flaccid Hemiplegia affecting right non-dominant side. Resident #14 is fed via peg tube. He is non-verbal and communicates using facial gestures, his hands, and head (nodding yes or no). Resident #14 gestured his displeasure on 05/06/24 at 1:47 PM to question, how do you feel watching your…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records review and interviews, the facility failed to investigate an incident in which 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #15) sustained injuries of unknown origin. The findings included: Resident #15's electronic clinical record revealed he was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and an initial admission date of 3/5/2024. Resident #15 diagnoses included: Dislocation of left shoulder joint; Anxiety Disorder; Atherosclerotic Heart Disease; Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; Osteoarthritis; Muscle weakness; Cognitive communication deficit; Difficulty walking; Convulsion; Depression; Localized swelling to left upper limb; History of falling. The Nurses' Progress Notes (NP's) dated 4/14/2024 at 7:07 AM, noted that Resident #15 was complaining of left-hand pain and swelling. the MD was notified, and an X-Ray was ordered. Another NP's notes dated 4/15/2024 documented that order received to send the resident to hospital for higher level of care and altered mental status. The 4/16/2024 NP's notes revealed that Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide assistance and supervision to maintain independent eating abilities for 2 (Resident #5 and #13) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. The findings included: 1) During the observation of the breakfast meal of 05/08/24 at 8:30 AM, it was noted that the meal tray was observed to be delivered to the room of Resident #5. Continued observation noted that the resident was visually impaired but alert. Continued observation noted that the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA- Staff E) set the tray on the resident's overbed table in front of the resident who was noted to be in a reclining position in the bed. The CNA failed to speak with the resident concerning where foods could be located on the meal tray or reposition the resident into an upright eating position in the bed. Further observation noted the CNA to leave the room and not return to give the resident supervision or assistance with the meal. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and treat a resident with Diabetes for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for insulin (Resident #17). The findings included: Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 and a Diabetic foot ulcer. A comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was cognitively intact (15/15 Brief Interview for Mental Status), and required partial/moderate assist for activities of daily living. The assessment further documented Resident #17 had not received any injections (insulin) since admission to the facility. Record review revealed Resident #17 was care planned for Diabetes, with an intervention to medicate as ordered. A review of Resident #17's orders on 05/08/24 revealed Resident #17 did not have any medications for Diabetes, nor any fingersticks or lab results indicating the resident's blood sugar levels. An interview was conducted with Resident #17 on 05/08/24 at 11:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, records review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide physician's ordered left hand splint to 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #14). The findings included: On 05/06/24 at 12:48 PM Resident #14 was observed in bed lying in supine position with contracted left hand and having no splint on. Resident #14 was alert, aware, but non-verbal. Review of the physician's orders dated 12/17/2022 revealed the following order: left hand splint to be worn up to 6 hours, 7 days a week. Apply left elbow splint up to 6 hours 7 days a week. Another order noted: Left Elbow Splint as tolerated, may remove for ADL care or skin checks. Also, Resident #14 to wear Carrot on left hand at all times except for hand hygiene and bathing. Resident #14's diagnoses included, Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction Affecting left non-dominant side; Muscle weakness generalized; Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Contracture left ankle; Anxiety Disorder; Ankylosis left wrist; Mild Cognitive impairment of unknown etiology; Ataxia; Irritant Contact Dermatitis; Progressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility Physician failed to identify and treat a resident with Diabetes for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for insulin (Resident #17) and failed to address a critical lab result for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #157). The findings included: A review of the facility's Policy and Procedures Medical Care/Standards of Practice, dated 11/30/2014 and revised on 03/03/21, documented: A physician supervises the medical care of each resident. Physician supervision includes but is not limited to: admission orders are consistent with the resident's current physical and mental status. No medications or treatments shall be given without a doctor's order. Whenever possible, each of the resident's clinical problems should be clearly identified in the progress notes and correlate with specific orders as well as results of tests and treatments. 1. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 and a Diabetic foot ulcer. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility Physician failed to document visits in a timely manner for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #17 and Resident #157). The findings included: A review of the facility's Policy and Procedures Medical Care/Standards of Practice, dated 11/30/2014 and revised on 03/03/21, documented: Physician visits are required according to the resident's needs and/or State and Federal guidelines. A physician visit is required within 48 hours of admission. For short term care, a physician must see the resident as often as medically necessary according to the medical status of the resident. It is recommended physician visits occur two or three times per week due to the medical complexity of the resident. Medical records must be maintained according to all state and federal requirements and in compliance with all center policies and procedures. The attending physician shall maintain his portion of the medical record, timely, in accordance with the center, State and Federal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare pureed foods by methods that conserve nutritive, value, flavor, and appearance for 4 (Residents #5, #7, #19, and #30) of 4 residents with physician ordered Pureed Diet with Pureed Fortified Foods. The findings included: During the observation of the lunch meal in the main kitchen on 05/06/24 at 11:30 AM, foods located on the steam table were observed and were taste tested by the surveyor. Specifically, the Pureed Cheese Ham & Macaroni Casserole, and Pureed Sauteed Spinach noted to be very thin and watery in consistency. The taste test confirmed that the pureed foods were too thin and had a watery consistency. Interview with the Lunch [NAME] (Staff C) at the time of the observation was noted to state she was unaware that the addition of too much liquid into the pureed food mixture results in decreased nutritional value of the pureed foods, and negative appearance and taste palatability. Staff C stated no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the hot water temperature at an acceptable level for the safety of the residents observed during an Environmental tour for 7 rooms out of 20 rooms occupied. The findings included: The policy titled, Monitoring and Recording Facility Hot Water Temperatures for Residents' Rooms, Common Areas, and Shower Rooms, dated 11/30/2014, showed to maintain and control hot water temperatures within the facility to federal and state standards. Hot water temperatures will be maintained at an acceptable level for the safety of the residents and staff. The following procedures will be implemented, by the Maintenance staff, if a hot water temperature is found to be above 110 degrees Fahrenheit, the acceptable level for resident rooms, showers, and common areas: (If high temperature is found on the weekend or holidays, immediately call the maintenance staff). In a tour conducted on 02/22/23 from 10:44 AM to 12:00 PM, the following rooms were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) ensure that it properly kept a resident covered in a dignified manner, 2) failed to ensure that it referred to a resident in a dignified manner, 3) failed to ensure that it promptly provided feeding assistance to a dependent resident during the lunch meal, 4) failed to ensure that it maintained the resident's Foley catheter in a dignified manner, 5) failed to provide meal trays to all residents at the same time ; and, 6) failed to sit at eye level during dining assistance. This deficient practice affected 5 of 19 sampled residents reviewed for dignity. (Resident #3, Resident #10, Resident #36, Resident #7 and Resident #23). The findings included: Review of the facility policy and procedure 02/23/23 titled, Policies and Procedures---Urinary Catheter Care provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) revised 09/05/17 documented in the Policy Statement: Procedure Provide privacy . Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide wound care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent infection and to follow physician's order for wound care for 1 of 1 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #6). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Dressing Change revised on 12/06/17 and policy titled Skin and Wound revised on 01/24/22 revealed the policy did not address wound care technique. Review of Resident #6's clinical record documented an initial admission to the facility on [DATE] with no readmissions. The resident's diagnoses included Diabetes Mellitus, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Anemia, and Alzheimer's. Review of Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of the Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating that the resident had severe cognition impairment. The assessment documented under Functional Status that the resident needed supervision to limited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional intervention and assessment in a timely manner for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #35). The findings included: The facility's policy titled, Medical Nutrition Therapy Assessment and Care Planning, revised on 09/2017, showed that a Registered Dietitian is responsible for completing a comprehensive nutritional assessment to identify and plan the nutrition care based on the needs, goals, and preferences of each Resident. In an interview conducted on 02/23/23 at 2:20 PM, Resident #35 was observed in her bed resting. She stated that she had gained some weight, had a great appetite, and was always hungry. Resident #35 noted that the Clinical Dietitian has yet to speak to her to obtain food likes and preferences or any additional snacks between meals. She further said that she likes coffee/mocha flavor shakes and Boost but that the facility does not offer these flavors or options. A record review showed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and to follow the physician orders for Tube feeding for 1 of 1 sampled residents reviewed for Tube Feeding (Resident #21). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Enteral Feeding- Enteral Nutrition Pump revised on 11/12/18 documented Nurses administer enteral feeding when volume control is indicated and as ordered by physician Review of Resident #21's clinical record documented an initial admission to the facility on [DATE] with a latest readmission on [DATE] . The resident's diagnoses included Parkinson's, Chronic Kidney Disease, Heart Disease, Dementia, Pain, Muscle wasting, Displaced Mid-cervical fracture of left femur with closed fracture routine healing and Anemia. Review of Resident #21's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of the Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating that the resident had moderate cognition impairment. The assessment documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) ensure that it secured over-the-counter (OTC) cream medication for 2 sampled residents observed, Resident #3 and Resident #37. 2) failed to ensure that it promptly secured the facility's Emergency medication box (E-kit) after use, during a Medication Administration Observation, for 1 of 1 Medication Storage Rooms, 3) failed to ensure that it discarded two expired stock OTC betadine swab stick packages in the facility's Medication Treatment Cart, 4) failed to ensure that it secured the facility's Treatment Medication Cart during Wound Care Observation; and 5) failed to secure routine medication during Medication Administration Observation, Resident #21. The findings included: Review of the facility policy and procedure on [DATE] at 4:21 PM titled LTC Facility's Pharmacy Services and Procedures Manual Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications, Biologicals [DATE]. provided by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide food and drink that is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for three residents during dining observations (Resident #7, Resident #3, and Resident #13). The findings included: 1. In an observation conducted on 02/22/23 at 7:55 AM, the first meal cart arrived on the unit. The breakfast tray was taken into Resident #7 ' s room and placed on the bedside table. Continued observation showed that at 8:25 AM, which was 30 minutes later, staff came into the room to assist Resident #7 with her breakfast meal. A record review showed that Resident #7 was admitted on [DATE], and the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, which is cognitively impaired. Section G for eating showed that Resident #7 is totally dependent on staff for eating. In an interview conducted on 02/22/23 at 2:00 PM, during the resident council meeting, residents stated that there is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide fortified foods for three residents during meal observation (Resident #7, Resident #1, and Resident #14). This has the potential to affect ten residents that are on fortified food diet orders. The findings included: A review of the Fortified Foods list provided by the facility showed that ten residents have a physician ' s order for fortified food with meals. In an observation conducted on 02/22/23 at 5:00 PM in the main kitchen, the Food Service Director/Cook was observed on the tray line plating the food on the plates and reading the meal tickets for each resident with gloves on. He was asked by Surveyor what is the fortified food for dinner, and he said it was the mashed potato and pointed to the metal container that was on the food warmer. A record review showed that Resident #7 was admitted on [DATE], and the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, which is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, serve, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food safety that, include not keeping cold foods at the correct temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit and below, keeping personal items in the food production area, and practicing hand hygiene while handling food. The findings included: 1) During the initial kitchen tour on 02/20/23 at 9:27 AM, accompanied by, Dietary Manager, the following were noted: There was an accumulation of food residues on the sharpening stones of the slicer. There was a cooler containing water that had unidentified matter floating in the water. There was an accumulation of debris under the shelving in the dry storage area. The baseboard covering the floor and wall juncture by the three-compartment sink and the mechanical ware washing machine was not secured to the wall. Under the sanitizer basin of the three-compartment sink, the pipe was leaking directly onto the floor when the basin was dumped. 2) In a visit to the central…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIATA HEALTH GROUP — 50 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Staffing 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.1+0.9 vs chain
The other 49 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspire At EvansFort Myers, FL 1 of 5Aviata At BenevaSarasota, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Big BendPerry, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Bryan DairyLargo, FL 1 of 5Aviata At FletcherTampa, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Palma Sola BayBradenton, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Saint LucieFort Pierce, FL 1 of 5Aviata At SarasotaSarasota, FL 1 of 5Aviata At SeminoleSeminole, FL 1 of 5Aviata At The BayTampa, FL 1 of 5Aviata At The PalmsPalm Harbor, FL 1 of 5Aviata At VeniceVenice, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Arbor SpringsOcala, FL 2 of 5Aviata At BradentonBradenton, FL 2 of 5Aviata At BrentwoodLecanto, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Colonial LakesWinter Garden, FL 2 of 5Aviata At EnglewoodEnglewood, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Grand OaksPalm Coast, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Green Cove SpringsGreen Cove Springs, FL 2 of 5Aviata At GreenacresGreen Acres, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Lakeside OaksDunedin, FL 2 of 5Aviata At OakfieldBrandon, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Santa BarbaraCape Coral, FL 2 of 5Aviata At South DaytonaSouth Daytona, FL 2 of 5Aviata At TallahasseeTallahassee, FL 2 of 5Aviata At The HarborSafety Harbor, FL 2 of 5Aviata At The Sea - PasadenaSouth Pasadena, FL 2 of 5Aviata At The Sea - Pompano BeachPompano Beach, FL 2 of 5Aviata At West Palm BeachWest Palm Beach, FL 2 of 5Aviata at Sand KeyClearwater, FL 3 of 5Aspire At Ridge HavenNew Port Richey, FL 3 of 5Aviata At BrooksvilleBrooksville, FL 3 of 5Aviata At Central ParkBrandon, FL 3 of 5Aviata At Coral BayWest Palm Beach, FL 3 of 5Aviata At CountrysidePalm Harbor, FL 3 of 5Aviata At JacksonvilleJacksonville, FL 3 of 5Aviata At North Fort MyersN Ft Myers, FL 3 of 5Aviata At RosewoodOrlando, FL 3 of 5Aviata At San JoseJacksonville, FL 3 of 5Aviata At St CloudSaint Cloud, FL

Showing 40 of 49; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MIAMI ROAD PARENT LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2023
HARBOR BEACH HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2023
FREUND, NOCHUMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2023
BOHORQUEZ, ANDRESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2023
ZELFMAN, MIKHAILIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/21/2025
DAGAN, AMITAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/10/2025
GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/10/2025
GOLDBERGER, FAIGYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/10/2025
HERSKOWITZ, ELIEZERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/10/2025
HERSKOWITZ, YAAKOVIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/10/2025
TRAVITSKY, AARONIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/10/2025
ASPIRE MGT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$1.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-21.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$36K
Related-party expense2% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 5%Other / private 29%

This home reported $36K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$367per resident / day
operating cost
$11,170per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$303per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105578. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next