Aviata At Tallahassee

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 70 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 143.6 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-08-13 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review and staff interviews, the facility neglected to provide basic life support, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1). The facility neglected the resident's needs for emergency care allowing the resident to expire despite a full code status.The findings include: A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed Resident #1 expired on [DATE] at 1:05 PM and that CPR was not performed. Staff A, a Registered Nurse (RN), provided a statement of events that took place on [DATE]. At 1:05 PM, the nurse observed that the resident was not breathing. She checked vital signs with respirations 0, blood pressure 0, and oxygen saturation 0%. On 1:09 PM, Staff A notified the hospice nurse by phone to tell of Resident #1's death. At 3:00 PM, another nurse working in the facility noted Resident #1 was a full code. At 3:02 PM, 911 was called and CPR was started on Resident #1. At 3:06 PM, Paramedics arrived and continued CPR on Resident #1. At 3:25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to submit an incident report within the required 2 hour timeframe for 2 of 2 reports reviewed for abuse and neglect.The findings include:1. Review of an allegation of physical abuse was conducted which revealed facility staff were made aware of the incident on 4/23/26 at 2:00 PM. Further review revealed the administrator was not notified by the staff until 4/23/26 at 6:30 PM. The report was not filed with the state agency until 4/23/26 at 9:05 PM. An interview was conducted with the facility Administrator on 5/12/26 at 9:00 AM concerning the delay in reporting this incident. He stated, I don't recall why I was late reporting this incident. It could be that I was collecting data for the report. Upon reviewing the investigation report times, he confirmed that the incident was reported later than the required 2-hour time frame. 2. Review of an allegation of neglect involving 17 residents who did not receive morning medications on 4/18/26 was performed. Review of the facility's investigation revealed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe and home-like environment for 3 of 58 occupied rooms and 2 of 111 residents screened during the initial tour. (Rooms #126, #216, #200, and Residents #63 and #100)Room observations (Photographic evidence obtained of all issues) On 9/15/2025 at 11:53 AM, Room # 216 (which was occupied) bathroom's toilet lid had a crack. The room's entry area ceiling had a brown-colored rust-like metal between the tiles. On 9/16/2025 at 9:21 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER]'s wall had brown-colored stains and paint had scratches. The room was being occupied. 09/15/2025 at 12:00 PM, a small refrigerator in room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed and a foul odor was detected. Inside a spilled brown liquid was present along with two unfinished bottles of soda. The freezer compartment had ice cream spilled throughout. The resident confirmed that the refrigerator had not been cleaned in a long time. On 9/16/2025, 9/17/2025, and 9/19/2025, subsequent observations confirmed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents by not screening 1 of 1 resident sampled for smoking. (Resident #164)On 9/18/25, a chart review was conducted of the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #164. No safe smoker screening was documented in the record. On 9/18/25 at approximately 3:25 pm, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). She was asked about the facility process for screening residents for smoking safety. She stated a smoking screen is done on every resident on admission. If the resident smokes, teaching is provided to the resident. The resident is added to the smoking list kept by activities staff. Activities staff are responsible for providing supervision and assistance to residents who smoke. When asked about Resident #164's current smoking status, she stated that the resident does not smoke. If she does want to start smoking, she will then be screened for safe smoking, provided teaching, and set up with Activities…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer prescribe pain medication and failed to refill pain medications for 1 of 1 residents sampled for pain medication. (Resident #52) On 9/16/25, a phone interview was performed with the daughter of Resident # 52. She stated that Resident #52 had not been receiving her nightly dose of MS Contin 75 ER for several days. A phone call was performed with the facility's pharmacy on 09/16/2025 at 1:36 PM. They stated that the facility requested a refill of MS Contin 75 mg ER for Resident # 52 on 7/2/2025 (25-day supply, ended 8/6/2025) and 8/4/2025 (25-day supply, ended 8/31/2025). No further refill requests had been received since then. On 09/16/2025 at 2:30 PM, the Director and Assistant Director of Nursing were interviewed. They demonstrated the procedure for refilling medications to prevent missing any days. They were shown on the Medication Administration Record that MS Contin was documented as given although no medication refill had been received. The staff stated that the facility had some extra dosages on hand to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, review of the electronic medical record (EMR), and review of the facilities policies and procedures, the facility failed to provide safe and secure storage of medications for 2 of5 residents observed for medication. (Residents # 24 and 42)The findings include:Resident # 24During an observation on 09/15/2025 at 12:00 PM, Resident # 24 playing had the following medications stored at their bedside table: Medicated body Power, 2 bottles of Isopropyl alcohol 91%, Vitamins A&D Ointment, Hydrocortisone Acetate 1% Cream, Olopatadine Hydrochloride (a medicine for itchy eyes), Ophtalmic solution 0.2%, and Voltaren Arthritis pain Cream. (Photographic evidence obtained). A repeat visit on 9/16/2025 at 1:37 PM, 9/17/2025 at 11:00 AM, and 9/19/2025 at 8:00 AM showed these medications were still in the bedside table. On 09/16/2025, a review of Resident #24's record shows no orders for self-administration of medications.Resident #42On 09/15/2025 at 12:30 PM, 09/16/2025 at 8:15 AM, 9/17/2025 at 11:00 AM, and 9/19/2025 at 8:00 AM, Resident #42 was observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were accurate and complete for 1 of 1 resident sampled. (Resident #63)The findings include:On 9/15/2025 at 11:47 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident #63. He stated he had a wound on his back that healed and another one on left arm that had not healed yet. On 9/17/2025 at 11:33 AM, an observation was made of Resident #63 receiving a clean dressing on his left posterior forearm.A review of Resident #63's medical record was conducted. Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including villonodular synovitis pigmented, major depressive disorder, quadriplegia, and morbid obesity. Physician's orders stated, left forearm: cleanse with wound cleanser, apply xeroform then cover with dry dressing every day shift with a start date of 7/15/25. A review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed documentation was left blank on 9/3/25, 9/7/25, 9/8/25, 9/11/25 and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record and policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow infection control practices for 1 of 1 resident sampled for wound care treatment (Resident #159), 1 of 2 residents sampled for droplet isolation precautions (Resident #34), and 1 of 1 resident sampled for contact isolation precautions. (Resident #107)Resident #107 A chart review conducted on Resident #107 revealed a physician order which stated, Isolation Type – CONTACT-methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) every shift for monitoring. Observations of the resident’s room door revealed a sign for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) [a different category of contact precautions] hung on an over-the-door caddy containing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) supplies such as gown, gloves, and masks. There was no signage for the ordered contact isolation precautions observed posted on the door. On 9/16/2025 at approximately 11:05 AM, an interview was conducted with the resident’s nurse Staff R, a Registered Nurse, about the resident’s current isolation status. He stated the resident is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of resident records, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to obtain consent for 1 of 2 psychotropic medications ordered for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for psychotropic medication usage. (Resident #3) The findings included: On 3/4/24, a review of the records for Resident #3 was conducted. A review of the Medication Administration Record in December 2024 indicated that, in addition to Mirtazapine (an antidepressant) 30 mg once a day, Resident #3 had been taking Trazadone (another antidepressant) 50 mg .5 tablet every 8 hours. Resident #3's record had a signed consent to take Mirtazapine 30 mg once a day. However, there was no consent for the Trazadone. A review of the psychiatric notes, dated 9/26/24, for Resident #3 was conducted. The psychiatry notes stated that Resident #3 was started on Trazodone due to an exacerbation of depression and mood disorder. The note indicated that medication changes were needed to stabilize his symptoms. The provider indicated that risks, benefits, and alternatives were discussed. The note does not clarify whom…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-14 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an adequately equipped call light system for the 100 hall of the building. The findings include: During the initial tour of the facility, it was noted that all the residents in the 100 hall were observed with hand held bells located at the bedside of each resident. When asked about this, the Administrator stated that the call light system was not working and these bells were being used in lieu of the call lights for now. He stated the call light system had been broken in the 100 hall for a very long time. However, it was noted upon looking in the rooms that there was no system of calling staff located in each of the bedrooms' private bathrooms. Upon further discussion, the Administrator stated the parts for the call light system had recently arrived and the repairs to the system should occur soon.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate and updated medical records for 1 out of 8 residents sampled. (Resident #2) The findings include: On [DATE], it was decided by the family that Resident #2's code status would be changed to Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). The family started the process and the facility assisted in getting the order signed by the doctor that same day. The Social Service Assistant brought back the completed to the facility at approximately 4:45 PM. On [DATE], Resident #2 was observed in bed without respirations and cold to the touch. Staff F, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), and Staff G, a Registered Nurse (RN), confirmed the advance directive on the electronic medical record, and it stated Resident #2 was a Full Code. Per facilities policy, they had to double check the Advance Directives book, located at the nurse's station, but it was not there. Staff F and G started cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) until paramedics pronounced the resident expired. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-11-13 for 71 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIATA HEALTH GROUP — 50 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $247K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL