Aviata At Sarasota

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

29.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 109.9 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure 1, (Resident #1), of 3 residents reviewed for accidents was not burned by hot coffee. The facility had not provided the required staff education and equipment to ensure the reheating of residents' food or beverages were served at an appropriate safe temperature.The findings included:On 12/1/25 a review of an adverse incident report revealed upon completion, Resident #1 had spilled hot coffee on his lap on 9/23/25 causing a blister to the right upper thigh area.On 12/1/25 a review of Resident #1's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction, muscle wasting and atrophy.A nursing progress note dated 9/24/25 at 6:43 p.m., stated the writer was informed by CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), Staff A, Resident #1 had spilled coffee on his lap. Upon assessment of the skin, the writer noted one small, blistered area on the upper right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2021-08-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of the facility's abuse and neglect policy and procedure, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to protect one (Resident #19) of one sampled vulnerable resident with dementia from neglect by failing to provide supervision, to ensure the necessary care and services were provided. The findings included: The facility policy N-1265, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation (revised 11/28/17) specified, It is inherent in the nature and dignity of each resident at the center that he/she be afforded basic human rights, including the right to be free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment and exploitation .neglect is the failure of the center, it's employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. A review of the clinical record for Resident #19 documented a care plan indicating Resident #19 had an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit due to confusion and dementia. The care plan interventions noted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2021-08-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for 3 (Resident #19, #42 and #63) of 17 sampled residents. The findings included: 1. A review of the clinical record for Resident #19 documented a care plan indicating Resident #19 had an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit due to confusion and dementia. The care plan interventions noted Resident #19 required extensive assistance of 1 for bathing, dressing, and toileting. The care plan also documented Resident #19 had alteration in communication related to severe dementia, confusion/delusions and his needs must be anticipated by staff. On 8/10/21 at 9:41 a.m., Resident #19 was observed in his room standing next to his bed eating breakfast with his fingers. The linen on the bed was soaked with urine and the room had a pungent odor of urine. Resident #19 had a hospital gown tied around his neck and hanging down his chest. The incontinent brief was overly saturated with urine and feces and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of facility policy, and clinical record review, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical status and decision to transfer the resident to the hospital for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents sampled.The findings included:Review of facility policy and procedure N-105 effective [DATE], revised [DATE], Notification of Change in Condition revealed Policy: The center to promptly notify the Patient/Resident, the attending physician, and the Resident Representative when there is a change in the status or condition. Procedure: The nurse to notify the attending physician and Resident Representative when there is a(n): Accident, Significant change in the patient/resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status, Need to alter treatment significantly due to but not limited: Adverse consequences, Acute condition, Exacerbation of chronic condition, A transfer or discharge of the Patient/Resident from the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect that resulted in death within the specified required timeframe for one resident (Resident #1) reviewed.The findings included:Review of facility policy N-1265 effective 11/30/2014, revised 11/16/2022 Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation & Misappropriation revealed Once an allegation of abuse is reported, the Executive Director, as the abuse coordinator, is responsible for ensuring that reporting is completed timely and appropriately to appropriate officials in accordance with Federal and State regulations.Review of facility investigation revealed on 12/26/25 at approximately 8:03 p.m. in a phone conversation with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator Resident #1's representative stated he felt Resident #1 should have been transferred to the hospital sooner. The investigation documented that the Administrator became aware of the situation on 12/26/25 at 8:03 p.m. The report of this…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure 1, (Resident #2), of 3 residents with admitting facility orders for an antibiotic medication were clarified by the residents' primary care physician The findings included:Review of the facility's Medication Reconciliation policy #N-1590, with an effective date of 12/17/24, stated the medication reconciliation is the process of ensuring accurate and complete medication list during a transition in care. The medication reconciliation occurs during admission/re-admission and discharge. The policy noted to review and compare medications from the most recent hospital stay, home or prior living establishment and prior stay in the facility; review medication dosage, frequency, and stop date; review all discrepancies with the physician and document findings on the Medication Reconciliation in the resident's medical record.Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Septic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility policy and procedures, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect residents from misappropriation of resident property when controlled medications were unaccounted for 1(Resident #45). On 2/13/24 it was reported Resident #45's Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5 milligrams (mg)-325 mg, 75 tablets were unaccounted for. The facility failed to account for all controlled medications to prevent loss or diversion. On 8/5/24 controlled medications were signed out on the narcotic declining drug inventory sheet as administered for 3(Resident #12, # 42, and #27) who were alert and oriented and reported they had not received the medications that were documented. On 10/2/24 Resident #63 reported he received a medication that was not his Oxycodone- Acetaminophen 10 mg-325 mg and had not requested the as needed medication from the nurse who documented it was administered. The findings included: The facility policy N-1265 Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation documented It is inherent in the nature and dignity of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, and review of the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to implement a system to account for periodic reconciliation and disposition of all controlled substances. The findings included: The facility Policy N-864 Control Drug Reconciliation Random Audit documented The facility in coordination with the licensed pharmacist provides for: A system of medication records that enables periodic accurate reconciliation and accounting for controlled medications. Prompt identification of loss or potential diversion of controlled substances and determination of the extent of the loss or potential diversion of controlled medications. On 12/11/24 at 10:15 a.m., during an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) said the process for narcotic medications was to have two nurses' sign when narcotics are received and two nurses sign when the medication is discontinued or the medication card is empty. The DON said she collects the discontinued medications from the medication carts weekly, the nurse and I sign the declining count sheet and then I place the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility policies and procedures, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of medication administration for 17(Residents #122, #222, #70, #41, #97, #13, #92, #10, #61, #8, #46, #67, #74, #12, #27, #63 and #42) of 17 residents reviewed for significant medication errors. The findings included: The facility policy N-861 Acceptance of Controlled Drugs documented, Controlled drugs will be delivered to the facility by the pharmacy in a sealed, tamper proof container. One nurse will sign for the container on the pharmacy delivery sheet. The container will remain sealed until a second nurse is available to open and validate the contents. 2 nurses will open the controlled drug container and reconcile the controlled drugs including but not limited to: correct medication, dosage, amounts. Controlled medications are then placed into the medication carts by the nurses. If discrepancies are found during reconciliation, notify the pharmacy and the director of nursing. Discrepancies may include but are not limited…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff and resident interviews and review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure 1(Resident #21) of 1 resident reviewed had a wheelchair in good working repair and was safe for resident use. The findings included: The facility policy Wheelchair (w/c) Repair-Electric Wheelchairs documented, Each resident requiring the use of a w/c will be provided the appropriate chair to maintain their highest level of functioning. All chairs will be maintained in a safe operating condition. When identified that the w/c is in need of repair, the staff will notify rehab to obtain a replacement w/c while the chair is being repaired. Preventive maintenance of each w/c should be done on a regular basis and the Director of Environmental Services should keep a log of this. On 12/10/24 at 12:59 p.m., Resident #21 was observed in his w/c, and said he needed a new w/c because his required repair. The resident got up from the w/c and it was observed to have a broken back support that did not provide the necessary support. The arm rests were frayed and covered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate housekeeping services to ensure the facility remained in good repair, and ensure facility staff were aware of how to report needed repairs to the maintenance staff. The findings included: 1. On 12/09/24 at 10:52 a.m., a large brown stain was observed on the carpet in the living room area adjacent to room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was a tear in the carpet noted with carpet material being frayed and sticking up above the carpet. The area of carpet torn was approximately 2 to 3 inches wide. On 12/11/24 at 3:17 p.m., during an interview, the Housekeeping Director said the stain in the 507-living area pod was caused by the air conditioner leaking. The Housekeeping Director said he had talked to maintenance about replacing the carpet. On 12/11/24 at 3:21 p.m., during an interview, the Maintenance Director said his plan is to replace all the carpets with hardwood flooring. The Maintenance Director said he has a hard time…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Record Review (PASARR) Level I and Level II were conducted prior to admission to the facility for 1 resident diagnosed with serious mental illness (#79) of 2 residents reviewed for PASARR. The findings included: Review of Resident #79's medical record revealed original admission to the facility on 9/1/22. The physician's orders dated 9/2/22 included psychiatry and psychology (consultations) as needed. The psychiatric diagnoses present on admission included: major depressive disorder, recurrent, mild on 9/1/22; psychophysiologic insomnia on 9/1/22. On 1/11/23, the physician ordered that the resident be sent to the emergency room related to altered mental status (AMS) including hallucinations, delusional and combative behaviors. On 1/11/23 the facility added the diagnosis of psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition. On 1/14/23 the facility added the diagnosis of major depressive disorder,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to formulate a comprehensive resident-centered care plan that included the services required to ensure proper functioning and maintenance including monitoring, testing, and ways to identify potential problems or complications for 2 (Residents #9, and #22) of 2 reviewed in the facility who had implanted cardiac pacemakers. The findings included: Review of the Policy for Pacemaker, monitoring of Resident, revised 9/5/17, nursing services will coordinate and assist with pacemaker checks for residents with pacemakers. The procedures included identifying residents with pacemakers and obtaining an order from the physician for routine scheduled pacemaker checks based on manufacturer or physician's order or recommendation. Document in the medical chart. Review of the Policy for Plans of Care revised 9/25/17: The procedures included developing a comprehensive plan of care including measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical needs that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$39,846 in federal fines across 7 penalties.

• $7,425 — penalty dated 2025-12-03
• $13,520 — penalty dated 2025-12-03
• $9,440 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
• $2,470 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
• $2,098 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
• $1,748 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
• $3,145 — penalty dated 2023-09-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIATA HEALTH GROUP — 50 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $74K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL