Aviata At The Harbor
1410 Dr Martin Luther King Jr St N, Safety Harbor, FL 34695 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (727) 726-1181 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (29) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.3% | 8.7% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.5% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.4% | 4.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 2.5% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.9% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.6% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.2% | 10.5% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.8% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 6.6–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 4.0–13.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.98 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 85.3 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the rights of a resident representative, appointed as the Guardian Advocate and authorized to consent to medical treatment, were honored related to communication of health status for one resident (#1) of five sampled residents.Findings included: On 06/10/2026 at 4:52 p.m., a telephone interview was conducted with Resident #1's family member. She reported that she had been appointed as the resident's Guardian Advocate in October 2025 and had provided the appointment paperwork to the Admissions Director at the time of the resident's admission. She stated she repeatedly contacted the facility for health updates but never received a return call. She reported that she had not signed any informed consents for psychotropic medications. She stated that a visitor went to the facility and shared concerns about the resident's care. On 05/13/2026, she personally went to the facility, found the resident lethargic and not at baseline, and requested the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the legally appointed Guardian Advocate was notified of and involved in health care decisions, including the use of psychotropic medications, for one resident (#1) of five sampled residents.Findings included:On 06/10/2026 at 4:52 p.m., a phone interview was conducted with Resident #1's family member. The family member stated they had been appointed Guardian Advocate in 10/2025 and had provided a copy of the appointment letter to the Admissions Director at the time of admission. They reported repeatedly calling the facility for updates on the resident's condition but never received a return call. They stated they did not sign any informed consent forms for psychotropic medications. The family member reported that a visitor had expressed concerns about Resident #1's care. On 05/13/2026, upon visiting the facility, the family member found the resident lethargic and not at baseline. They requested the resident be sent to the hospital, and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission to address Advance Directives and person-centered care for one resident (#1) of five sampled residents.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's clinical record showed an admission date of 04/23/2026 and a discharge date of 05/13/2026. The face sheet identified the resident's primary emergency contact as a family member who was also listed as Guardian Advocate, with a home phone number and email address.Resident #1's diagnoses included: malfunction of continent stoma of urinary tract; muscle weakness; methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection; neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder; fibromyalgia; chronic pain syndrome; pressure ulcer of left hip, stage 3; pressure ulcer of other site, stage 3; and spina bifida, unspecified. Onset dates for the latter diagnoses were 04/23/2026.Review of the documents scanned into the clinical record showed Letters of Guardian Advocate uploaded on 04/23/2026. The legal document, issued by the Circuit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person centered care plan addressing hearing impairment and hearing aid management for one resident (#2) out of five residents sampled.Findings included: On 06/10/2026 at 9:32 a.m., Resident #2 was observed sitting on the side of her bed, partially through her breakfast meal, and wearing a hospital gown. The resident stated she had lost both hearing aids-one had been missing a while and the second was now gone. A landline telephone was on her bedside table. The resident could not recall when either hearing aid went missing.Record review showed that Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE]. Her face sheet listed a family contact. Diagnoses included muscle weakness, hypothyroidism, glaucoma, and hypertension. The personal effects inventory dated 01/01/2026 documented one pair of hearing aids.A review of the care plan on 06/10/2026 identified a focus area related to altered self care performance due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure temperature logs were completed daily, the microwave in the nutritional room was kept clean and sanitary, and the kitchen reach-in refrigerator was not over packed with food items to keep cold foods at an appropriate safe temperature. Findings included: An observation, during the kitchen initial tour, on 07/29/24 at 9:06 a.m., revealed the walk-in refrigerator was not in service. During an interview on 07/29/24 at 9:07 a.m., Staff I, [NAME] stated the walk-in refrigerator quit working on 07/28/24 and this was reported to administration. Staff I, [NAME] stated all the food from the walk-in refrigerator was moved to the three-door reach-in refrigerator. During an interview on 07/29/24 at 9:08 a.m., Staff C, Interim Dietary Manager (IDM) stated Staff D, Dietary Manager (DM) just started today and was currently doing the morning rounds in the nourishment rooms. Further observations in the kitchen area on 07/29/24 at 9:20 a.m. revealed the following logs were not completed: - A Freezer Temperature Log…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility 1) failed to ensure oxygen was delivered according to physician orders for one resident (#91) with a tracheostomy tube out of two sampled residents with a tracheostomy tube, and 2) failed to ensure emergency tracheostomy supplies were readily available at the resident's bedside according to standards of practice for two residents (#91 and #83) out of two residents sampled with a tracheostomy tube. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #91's admission Record revealed she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of tracheostomy status, dependence on supplemental oxygen, non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage from left middle cerebral artery, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, systemic lupus erythematosus, aphasia, and pulmonary fibrosis. An observation was conducted on 07/29/24 at 10:18 AM of Resident #91. She was observed to be in bed, eyes open, nonverbal, with a tracheostomy tube. She was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility did not ensure medication was stored safely for one out two medication rooms, two out of three medication carts, one treatment out of two treatment carts and medication properly stored for one resident (#38) out of forty residents sampled. Findings include: On July 29, 2024, at 10:00 a.m., during the initial tour of the east wing an inhaler was observed on Resident 38's bedside table [photograph evidence obtained]. Upon this observation the resident was not in the room to interview. Further observation revealed the inhaler present on the bedside table later during the afternoon. On July 30, 2024, at 8:25 a.m., an observation was made on the east wing of an unlocked treatment cart. The cart was located across from the nurses' station in an area where residents could easily open drawers. In the second drawer were various residents medications for wound care. Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) locked the drawer and stated the drawer was most likely re-stocked last night or early this morning and they forgot to lock…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to serve food at an appetizing temperature for five residents ( #90, #95, #29, #51 and #18) of five residents sampled for food services. Findings included: 1. During an interview on 07/29/2024 at 10:15 a.m., Resident #90 stated he was frustrated with the food in the facility. He said that no fresh fruits or vegetables are ever given, and the food is over processed. He said he feels like he is losing weight. The resident stated he often orders a salad as a substitute from the Always Available Menu because he feels the food the facility is serving is not healthy. He said, This past weekend I wanted a chicken salad from the Always Available Menu and I was told there was no salad because they did not have any lettuce or tomatoes. The resident said the food is always the same and the facility never changes the menu. He stated he often has no breakfast meat. He said he has told the facility many times, but nothing has changed. An interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility 1) failed to ensure an effective infection control program related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBPs) for three residents (#206, #202, and #203) out of four residents observed, and 2) failed to ensure appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was utilized during resident care for four residents (#206, #202, #203 and #83) out of four residents observed. Findings included: On 7/29/2024 at 9:40 a.m., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident #203. Resident #203 was conversant and able to state she had a gastrostomy tube for nutrition and medication. Resident #203 stated since her admission she has not witnessed any staff member wear a gown during her care or medication administration via gastrostomy tube. No signage was observed on the outside of Resident #203's door to indicate EBPs were in place and no PPE was observed for staff use. On 7/29/2024 at 10:45 a.m., an observation and interview was made of Resident #202 during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and observations, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment, free from potential accidents/hazards for residents in one smoking area out of one smoking area in the facility, Findings included: On 7/30/2024 at 11:05 a.m., an observation and interview were conducted on the smoking patio area of the facility. Two residents were under the smoking gazebo with two family members present. In the center of the gazebo ceiling there were two wooden planks not connected to a foundation beam bowing down onto the smoking patio. Above the table provided for the residents during smoking times were further beams bowing down but appeared to be connected to a foundation beam. There was heavy growth of plant-like substances on numerous beams. The gazebo had three light foundations that were heavy with plant-like substances and one light fixture without a cover. During the observation a visiting family member stated, I'm surprised this whole thing hasn't fallen down already. (Photographic evidence was obtained). On 8/01/2024 at 9:00 a.m., an interview was conducted with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 19 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Thirty-five medication administration opportunities were observed and four errors were identified for one resident (#83) out of four residents observed. These errors constituted an 11.43% medication error rate. Findings include: On 7/31/2024 at 9:50 a.m., medication administration observations were made with Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) for Resident # 83. The staff member dispensed the following medications: - MiraLAX powder 17 grams -Tizanidine 4 milligram (mg) one tablet -Ipratropium Bromide 0.5 mg and Albuterol sulfate 3 mg (resident's representative refused) -Modafinil 200 mg (100 mg) two tablets -Lyrica 100 mg one tablet -Aspirin 81 mg chewable -Eliquis 5 mg one tablet -Guaifenesin oral 200mg/5 milliliters (ml) give 5 ml -gave 5ml of 200mg/10ml -Multivitamin one tablet -Levetiracetam oral solution 100 mg/ml, 10 ml measured A review of the physician orders for Resident #83 has an order. dated 11/21/2023. for B12 Active oral tablet chewable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-06-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of policies and procedures the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment by not ensuring: 1. cleanliness of 10 resident rooms, (104, 116, 126, 130, 131, 201, 214, 216, 226, 231) were free from dried food, spilled liquids on the floors, buildup of dust, dirt, and debris found under resident beds, broken furniture, 2. air conditioning units were free from bio-growth, dust and debris or leaking water for seven resident rooms (#106, #108 #110 #114, #231, #221, #220), 3. five ceiling vents in the kitchen were free from bio growth dust and debris, 4. two residents (#58 and #33) and in addition one resident room (#227) had sufficient clean bedding or linen. The failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment affected two wings (East and West) of two wings for four of four days of survey. Findings included: 1. On 06/27/2022 at 10:30 a.m. the following observations of resident rooms #104, #116, #126,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to implement an effective Infection Control Program in response to COVID-19 as evidenced by: 1. two staff members (O, K) not doffing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and not wearing PPE appropriately in two of two COVID positive rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]); 2. not providing clean and sanitary water cups on a daily basis for three residents (#33, #35 and #407) and in two resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]); 3. one staff member (U) not performing hand hygiene during the passing of food trays on one unit (West) of two units; and 4. not maintaining a clean environment in the laundry area used to process facility linen and the residents' personal items with the potential to affect a census of 97 residents. Findings included: 1. On 6/27/22 at 12:15 p.m., an observation was made of Staff O, Restorative Aide, standing in the hallway outside of room [ROOM NUMBER], where a COVID-19 positive resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-30 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to assess three residents (#408, #19, and #12) out of 97 admitted residents for self-administration of medications related to the medications left at the bedside. Findings included: 1. An observation was made on 6/27/22 at 10:23 a.m. of a medication cup on the over-bed table of Resident #408. The cup contained a white round tablet imprinted with 12, one oval pill imprinted with 125, and a white capsule printed with IP 101. The Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist (ADON/IP) confirmed the medication was left at bedside for Resident #408. The ADON/IP stated she did not know when they had been administered and the resident had not received any medications from her and she had yet to be in the resident's room that day. The admission Record revealed Resident #408 was admitted on [DATE]. The admission Record included diagnoses not limited to unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, unspecified bilateral hearing loss,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to implement interventions identified in the comprehensive person-centered care plan for two residents (#35 and #296) related to falls and the refusal of care of a total sample of forty-seven residents. Findings included: 1. A review of the admission Record revealed Resident #35 was admitted on [DATE]. The admission Record included diagnoses not limited to history of falls, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications, and unspecified bipolar disorder. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, indicating an intact cognition. During an interview with Resident #35, on 6/27/22 at 3:34 p.m., the resident's bed was hip-high. The resident reported going to the hospital due to sliding out of bed. The resident has the bed controller in reach and can move the bed up and down. Resident #35 reported not knowing how high the bed was and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure respiratory care and services were provided consistent with professional standards of practice for three residents (#89, #12 and #78) related to: 1. not obtaining a physician's order for use of oxygen for one Resident #89, and 2. not maintaining respiratory equipment in a sanitary manner for two residents (#12 and #78) out of five residents sampled for respiratory care. Findings included: 1. An interview was conducted with Resident #89's family member on 06/27/22 at 10:50 a.m. stating (Resident #89) has had breathing issues. He noted she was supposed to get an appointment to see her pulmonary doctor. He indicated, usually the facility is good at updating him. An observation was made on 06/28/22 at 8:55 a.m. of Resident #89 sleeping comfortably. No signs of shortness of breath or gasping were noted. Observed oxygen tubing placed via nasal cannula and free of kinks. An observation was made on 06/28/22 at 10:37 a.m. of Resident #89…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management by not ensuring pain medications were administered in a timely manner for one resident (#4) of two residents reviewed for pain management. Findings included: During a facility tour on 06/27/22 at 12:02 p.m., Resident #4 stated she had not received her 9:00 a.m. meds (medications). Resident #4 stated she had also asked for a PRN (as needed) med for pain. Resident #4 confirmed she did not received anything all morning and she did not know why. Resident #4 stated she first asked for her Oxycodone for pain at around 8:30 a.m. Resident #4 said, This happens quite often and sometimes they give me double a dose because they did not administer the first dose on time. This is not the first time. It is not right. Resident #4 was noted grimacing and re-stated she had requested pain meds all morning. Resident #4 stated it was frustrating not to have her medications. An immediate interview was conducted on 06/27/22 at 12:05 p.m. with Staff L, Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM). Staff L…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty-six medication administration opportunities were observed and six errors were identified for two residents (#100 and #83) of five residents observed. These errors constituted a 23.08% medication error rate. Findings included: 1. On 6/28/22 at 9:03 a.m., an observation of medication administration with Staff E, Registered Nurse (RN), was conducted with Resident #100. The staff member dispensed the following medications: - Amlodipine 2.5 milligram (mg) tablet orally - Pantoprazole Delayed Release (DR) 40 mg tablet orally - Topiramate 100 mg tablet orally - Gabapentin 600 mg - 2 tablets orally - Lisinopril 40 mg tablet orally - Vitamin C 500 mg tablet orally - Vitamin D3 25 microgram (mcg)/ 1000 international unit (iu) tablet orally - Vitamin B 12 500 mcg tablet orally - Duloxetine 60 mg DR caplet orally - Oxycodone-Acetaminophen 7.5-325 mg tablet orally - Zofran 4 mg tablet orally During the dispensing of the above medication, Resident #100 informed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure medications stored an inaccessible to unauthorized staff, residents, and visitors for three residents (#40, #90 and #53) for two days (6/27/22, 6/28/22) of a four day survey. Findings included: 1. During a facility tour on 06/27/22 at 10:23 a.m., an observation was made in Resident #40's room of four tablets on the floor between two dressers. A small water glass and a medicine cup were noted on the floor next to the tablets. One tablet was large, white, an oval shaped; one table was small, round, and pink; one tablet was small, round and light orange, another tablet was dark pink and round. On 06/27/22 at 12:03 p.m., a second observation was made of the same tablets on the floor between two dressers in Resident #40's room. During the second observation, it was noted that housekeeping had already cleaned the room. On 06/27/22 at 3:15 p.m., a third observation was made of the four tablets in Resident #40's room. During this observation, an additional small, round, yellow tablet was noted by Resident #40's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure effective interventions were in place for prevention of falls for once Resident (#23) with head injury; prevention of falls with a fracture for one Resident (#94); and the prevention of inappropriate behavior for one Resident (#460) out of 47 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. On 03/02/21 at 12:45 p.m. Resident #23 was observed propelling his wheelchair toward the smoking area. He exited into the smoking area. He was wearing shorts, and red abrasions were observed on his legs. On 03/03/21, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) were at the facility in the early morning. The facility reported that they were there to transport Resident #23 to the hospital because he had fallen and sustained injuries. Observation and interview were conducted with Resident #23 on 03/03/21 at 3:06 p.m. in his room. He was seated in his wheelchair. His bed linens were disheveled. The call light was observed on the bed. There was a hole observed in his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-05 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident #67) out of 28 residents receiving respiratory treatments was assessed for self-administration of treatments. Findings Included: On 03/02/21 at 12:20 p.m. Resident #67 was observed in her bed in her room. There was a Bi-Pap machine on her bedside table and an oxygen (O2) concentrator machine which was running and was set at 4 liters per minute (4 L/min). The resident was not connected to any oxygen delivery devices and stated that she was just about to switch from her Bi-Pap machine which she used for her sleep apnea to her nasal cannula. She also revealed a nebulizer treatment delivery device. Regarding respiratory treatments, the resident stated that she mostly manages it all including nebulizer treatments. On 03/04/21 at 8:06 a.m. the resident was observed sleeping with the Bi-Pap machine running and mask in place. On 03/04/21 at 12:00 p.m. the resident was observed asleep with the Bi-Pap machine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-03-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of preferences related to bathing for one (Resident #67) out of 47 sampled residents. Findings Included: An interview was conducted with Resident #67 on 03/04/21 at 2:33 p.m. She reported that the facility had her scheduled to receive showers in the evenings after she came back to the facility from her hemodialysis treatments. She stated that sometimes she was too tired after her treatments and requested to have her shower the next day but the next day the staff would tell her their schedule was already full and they had no time to give her a shower. The resident reported that she spoke to Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Unit Manager (UM) about her concern and asked to be switched to a Tuesday/Thursday shower schedule. The resident reported that no changes had been made since she spoke with Staff J about it. She stated that she had not filed a grievance related to the concern because she didn't…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-03-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to investigate and report an alleged sexual abuse, observed and documented by Staff member I, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) by one Resident (#460) towards another Resident (#218) of three reviewed. Findings Included: Review of the progress notes dated 1/17/21 at 3:24 a.m. written by Staff member I, LPN, read, Resident refused to be put in bed, resident was in dayroom being watched by staff and while they were attending to other residents they were assigned to, resident left dayroom and was found in another resident room [Resident #218] touching on her feet and had a hand underneath her blanket by resident's leg. Director of Nursing (DON) notified and was told to put resident in bed regardless of his wishes to stay up. Resident has orders in place for one on one watch due to behaviors, but due to staffing resident was not able to be put on these precautions during the night shift. During an interview with the DON on 3/5/21 at 6:03 p.m. the DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-03-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility did not ensure that daily care was provided for 3 (# 52, #44 and #09) of 6 residents sampled for ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) as evidenced by: not providing baths or showers, not providing linens for care and not responding to calls in a timely manner. Findings included: 1. During a facility tour conducted on the East wing on 03/02/21 at 02:14 p.m. and 03/03/21 at 10:16 a.m., Resident #52 was observed in bed, noted with flaky skin and white stuff crusted on face and ears. During an interview at the time, Resident # 52 stated that he had not had a bed bath or shower since moving into the East Wing at the end of January 2021. Resident #52 stated that he is supposed to be assisted to a shower or bath twice a week on Tuesdays, and Fridays. Resident #52 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis to include: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, other specified diabetes, arthropathic, low…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-03-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record, observation, and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure that one resident (#34) of 47 sampled residents benefited from activities designed to meet the interests of the Resident, and provide support for her physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Although Resident #34's care plan included activities to include socialization outside of the Resident's room and indicated that Resident #34 was totally dependent on the staff for attending these activities, Resident #34 received only room visits and this did not include the basic need for time out of doors. Findings included: Resident # 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the primary diagnosis of diffuse traumatic brain injury, other pertinent diagnoses included aphasia, quadriplegia, anoxic brain damage, and major depressive disorder. Evidence of the aphasia is documented in section C, the cognitive pattern section of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. A score of zero was documented in answer to the question of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-03-05 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to change a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line dressing according to industry standards for one Resident (#211) of three Residents observed. Findings Included: On 3/2/21 at 3:30 p.m., Resident #211 was observed with a PICC line Intravenous (IV) dressing dated 2/17/21. Resident #211 confirmed the dressing had not been changed and the nurse told him it would be changed today. Resident #211 confirmed the nurses clean the IV and give him medication through the line. On 3/2/21 at 3:40 p.m., Staff member F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) confirmed the dressing was dated 2/17/21 and that it was due to be changed today. Staff member F, LPN confirmed the dressing should be changed every seven days and that the dressing is past the seven days. On 3/2/21 at 4:00 p.m., The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the dressing on the PICC line should be changed every seven days. Review of the resident record revealed Resident #211 admitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility did not ensure tracheostomy (Trach) care was provided for one Resident (#4) of one resident with a tracheostomy in the East wing. Findings included: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an original admission date of 11/06/18 noted. He was admitted with a diagnosis to include: Quadriplegia unspecified, tracheostomy status, pressure ulcer of sacral region, muscle weakness, unspecified neuromuscular dysfunction bladder, hypertension, old myocardial infarction, anxiety disorder, diabetes, history of pulmonary embolism, hyperlipidemia, osteomyelitis unspecified, nasal congestion, major depressive disorder, single episode and other muscle spasm. During a facility tour of the East Wing on 03/03/21 10:30 AM, Resident #4 was observed laying in bed watching TV. Resident #4 reported that the previous night he had waited an hour to receive trach suction care. Resident #4 stated that he called for help for an hour and the evening Nurse did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-03-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice related communication with the dialysis facility contributing to failure of monitoring resident status post-dialysis treatment for one Resident (#67) out of one resident receiving hemodialysis. Findings Included: Review of the completed document Resident Census and Conditions of Residents (CMS-672) provided by the facility, dated 03/02/21, revealed that there was only one resident in the facility that was receiving hemodialysis treatments; that resident was confirmed as Resident #67 during the survey entrance conference. An interview was conducted with Resident #67 on 03/02/21 at 12:20 p.m. She confirmed that she received hemodialysis treatments at an outpatient center three times a week (Mon, Wed, Fri). A review of the medical record for Resident #67 revealed diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus with complication, end stage renal disease, and dependence on renal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility did not ensure proper medication storage for one resident, (# 49) out of 26 residents observed. Findings included: During a tour of the East wing on 03/04/21 9:03 a.m., Resident #49 was observed in bed having finished breakfast. An observation was made of the meal tray cart parked outside Resident #49's door. Staff H, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was observed going room to room collecting breakfast trays. Resident #49 started yelling to Staff H, CNA, you took my meds, they were in a cup. Staff H, CNA was observed putting a breakfast tray removed from resident's room in the meal cart. Staff H, CNA told the resident that his glasses were on his side table. Resident #49 continued to shout stating that he was talking about his medications that were in a cup, not his glasses. Staff H, CNA looked through the trays again and could not locate the medications. Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) came out of the room next to Resident #49's room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVIATA HEALTH GROUP — 50 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
The other 49 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 49; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| DR MLK PARENT LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/01/2023 |
| SAFETY HARBOR HEALTH HOLDCO LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/01/2023 |
| FREUND, NOCHUM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2023 |
| EDELMANN, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/08/2024 |
| PALANCA, EDUARDO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2024 |
| DAGAN, AMITAI | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/04/2025 |
| GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/04/2025 |
| GOLDBERGER, FAIGY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/04/2025 |
| HERSKOWITZ, ELIEZER | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/04/2025 |
| HERSKOWITZ, YAAKOV | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/04/2025 |
| TRAVITSKY, AARON | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/04/2025 |
| ASPIRE MGT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $62K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105549. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.