No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Aviata At St Cloud

4641 Old Canoe Creek Road, Saint Cloud, FL 34769 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (407) 892-7344 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (407) 892-7344 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 20242 actual-harm citations$91,612 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $91,612 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-17)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
4227 13th St · (321) 235-6230 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4400 13th St · (407) 957-4333 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.2 mi
4056 13th St · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.3%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.8%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.7%4.6%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.6%2.5%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.8%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.5%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.5%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.7%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.1%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.6%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.4%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.0%26.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.5%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.822.131.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.541.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 78 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
70.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 70.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 85 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.6%CMS range 37.5–55.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 7.1–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge70.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge69.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge54.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.1%CMS range 6.4–14.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.091.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.51
RN hours/ resident / day
0.83
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.13
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.48
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.21
RN hoursweekends
31.4%
Total nursing turnover
46.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 114.6 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.478 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-10)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2023-08-17)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-06-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility neglected to provide appropriate care and services to prevent a pressure injury for a vulnerable and physically impaired resident and failed to complete a thorough investigation for neglect after a worsening pressure injury for 1of 4 residents sampled for pressure ulcers, of a total sample of 17 residents, (#3). The facility's failure to implement preventative interventions, ensure timely and adequate treatments for pressure injuries and complete a thorough investigation for neglect resulted in actual harm, for one dependent resident who was deemed at risk for development of wounds. Resident #3 acquired a pressure injury in the facility that was not treated for 10 days after it was identified which caused the wound to worsen. Resident #3 suffered severe wound infections and sepsis that required hospitalization. He later died on hospice services. Findings: Resident #3 was an [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included lung…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-06-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services, according to professional standards of practice, to promote skin integrity and prevent the development and worsening of pressure injuries for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure injuries, of a total sample of 17 residents, (#3). The facility's failure to implement preventative interventions and ensure timely and adequate care and treatments for pressure injuries resulted in actual harm, for one dependent resident who was deemed at risk for development of wounds. Resident #3 acquired a pressure injury that was not treated for 10 days after it was identified which caused the wound to worsen. Resident #3 suffered severe wound infections and sepsis that required hospitalization, and he subsequently died on hospice services. Findings: Review of the medical record revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include lung abscess with pneumonia, Alzheimer's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the only Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)-accessible public entrance in operable condition. As a result, residents using wheelchairs were unable to independently enter the facility and were required to wait outside until staff or others opened the door for them for 3 of 3 resident reviewed for preferences of a total sample of 10 residents, (#5, #6, and #7).Findings: On 6/30/26 at 9:16 AM, as the surveyor was about to enter the facility, the handicapped-accessible button located to the right of the outside entrance door was pressed; however, it did not open the doors. The second set of interior doors was opened by the receptionist. On 6/30/26 at 9:18 AM, when asked about the handicapped-accessible button outside not working, the receptionist stated it did not work and it had not worked for a while. She explained she could open the inside doors with a control button at her desk; however, to open the outside doors, she had to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive significant change in status assessment for 1 of 1 resident review for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) in a total sample of 10 residents, (#1).Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unstageable sacral pressure injury, functional quadriplegia, type 2 diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/28/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS assessment showed resident #1 required substantial/maximal assistance from staff for eating, oral hygiene, upper body dressing and personal hygiene. Resident #1 was dependent for toileting hygiene, showering/bathing, lower body dressing, and putting on and taking off footwear. The MDS assessment also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the resident's care plan for toileting for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Activities for Daily Living (ADLs) in a total sample of 10 residents, (#1).Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unstageable sacral pressure injury, functional quadriplegia, type 2 diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 5/31/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS assessment showed resident #1 was dependent on staff for all ADLs, including toileting hygiene. The MDS assessment also showed resident #1 was dependent for rolling left and right in bed and chair/bed-to-chair transfers. Sit-to-lying, lying-to-sitting on the side of the bed, sit-to-stand, and toilet transfers were documented as not attempted due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff reported allegations of abuse timely and thoroughly investigate an alleged incident of sexual abuse by a cognitively impaired male resident, (#2), resulting in a delay of implementation of appropriate corrective actions, based on the result of the investigation findings.Findings:Review of resident #1's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease with late onset, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, mood disorder, disorder of psychological development, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.Review of resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had clear speech, was able to be understood, and could understand others. Her Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score was 10 out of 15, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment.Resident #2's record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike dining experience in the day/dining rooms on both nursing units for all residents who ate their breakfast and dinner meals there. This affected 29 residents at the two observed meals with the potential to affect all residents who chose to eat their meals in the unit's day/dining rooms. Findings: The facility's main dining room was noted during the survey dates from 4/08/25 to 4/10/25 not to be open for residents to eat their breakfast or dinner meals. For breakfast and dinner, residents were able to eat in the day/dining room on either of the two nursing units, or in their bedroom. On 4/08/25 at 8:10 AM, six residents were observed as they ate breakfast in the day room on the 100's unit. The meals for each resident were served with their dishes, drinks, and flatware left on the meal trays from which they ate, which created an institutional appearance. There were also no centerpieces or linen on the tables. A few minutes later, at 8:20 AM, twelve residents were observed as they ate breakfast in the 200's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to implement hand hygiene protocol for residents to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 23 residents who ate meals in the dining room. Findings: On 4/07/25 at 11:49 AM, in the facility main dining room, 23 residents were observed as they were assisted to their tables to dine. Several residents stated they arrived from physical therapy. None of the residents were offered a way to clean their hands before they ate. A short time later at 12:12 PM, staff sat next to and provided meal assistance to four residents without providing hand hygiene for them. On 4/10/25 at 8:58 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D explained that several years ago they used to hand out wipes to residents to clean their hands before they ate but over time that practice stopped. She added, it would be a good thing to do that again because cleaning hands was important to help stop the spread of germs. CNA D said the residents often touched their food while eating and they could have germs on their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure implementation of policies to the extent of including thorough monitoring of previously identified areas of concern and adequately tracking performance to ensure prior improvement measures were realized and sustained. Findings: Review of the complaint survey conducted on 12/10/24 at the facility revealed citations including F609 for concerns related to reporting of abuse allegations. During the course of the current survey, F609 was again identified for concerns of investigating and reporting allegations of abuse and/or neglect. As a result of the repeat citation, it was identified there was insufficient auditing and oversight of the previous mentioned citation. On 2/18/25 at 3:55 PM, the Administrator explained she did not look at the actual grievance forms, just the grievance log brought in monthly to the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting. She stated the facility's last QAPI meeting was held on 2/13/25 and the focus was the facility's new QAPI plan. The Administrator stated she was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were knowledgeable of and followed their grievance process for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for grievances, of a total sample of 8 residents, (#7). Findings: Review of resident #7's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy (disorder that affects the brain), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes, liver disease, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 1/22/25 revealed resident #7 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 7 out of 15 which indicated she was cognitively impaired. The MDS assessment indicated she had no hearing or vision impairment. She was usually understood by other and she usually understood others. The MDS assessment noted no behaviors and no rejection of care necessary to obtain goals for her health and well-being. She was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent further abuse, and timely and accurately report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse, of a total sample of 8 residents, (#1 and #7). Findings: 1. Review of resident #7's medical record revealed she was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy (disorder that affects the brain), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes, liver disease, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/22/25 revealed resident #7 was usually understood by other and she usually understood others. Resident #7 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 out of 15 which indicated she was cognitively impaired. The MDS assessment noted no behaviors and no rejection of care necessary to obtain goals for her health and well-being. She was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff reported allegations related to an incident of alleged verbal abuse of a resident by a staff member in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect/exploitation, (#1). Findings: Resident #1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke) due to embolism of left middle cerebral artery, aphasia (inability to speak), generalized anxiety disorder, and recurring major depression. Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 12 out of 15 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. He presented with depressed moods for several days during the two week look back period and did not exhibit any behaviors of rejection of care or physical and verbal violence towards others. Resident #1 had upper and lower extremity functional limitations in range of motion to the right side of his body. He…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and revise the person-centered comprehensive care plan to ensure it met their preferences, goals, and addressed their medical, physical, mental and psychosocial needs, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for changes in behavior, of a total sample of 3 residents, (#3). Findings: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a wedge compression fracture of unspecified lumbar vertebra, Parkinson's Disease, adult failure to thrive, and cognitive communication deficit. He was discharged from the facility on 11/25/24 due to family request to take him to a different state. Resident #3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 out of 15, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The assessment revealed he did not exhibit any physical or verbal behaviors towards others and did not have any wandering behaviors. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete and accurately documented related to missing and incomplete documentation of a reportable incident for 2 of 3 sampled residents, (#2, and #3). Findings: Review of the facility's reportable/adverse incidents from September- November 2024, revealed a report of alleged resident to resident abuse involving resident #2 and #3. According to the report on 11/18/24 at approximately 1:00 AM, a nurse reported to the On-call Supervisor that resident #3 had entered resident #2's room and was observed by staff attempting to pull resident #2 out of bed by her wrist to take her to the shower. According to witness statements resident #3 was not wearing any clothing except for a blanket around him. The report indicated staff took resident #3 to his room and then completed an assessment on both residents. Resident #2 was found to have slight redness on her wrist with no other visible injuries and she expressed to the nurse that she was not afraid of resident #3 but was not intending to go with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe smoking environment for 10 of 10 residents reviewed for smoking, of a total sample of 17 residents, (#11, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23). Findings: On 9/18/24 at 10:45 AM, resident #11 was observed in his room sitting on the edge of his bed. He was noted with bilateral high above the knee leg amputations. On his night table next to the bed in clear view was a pack of cigarettes and lighter. He was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. He said that some of the residents were allowed to keep their cigarettes and lighters, but staff did hold some of the residents' lighters. On 9/18/24 at 11:20 AM, residents #11, #15, #16 and #17 were observed outside smoking on the patio, with no staff present outside on the patio. None of the residents had on smoking aprons and resident #11 lit resident #15's cigarettes with his own lighter. The four residents present smoking used an ashtray on the patio table that was overflowing with old cigarette butts as well as one butt that was still…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-19 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide intravenous (IV) care and services according to standards of practice and plans of care for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for IV care, of a total sample of 17 residents, (# 2, and #18). Findings: 1. On 9/18/2024 at 12:14 PM, resident #2 was observed with a midline intravenous (IV) catheter in her right upper arm with a transparent dressing. There was no date on the dressing noted. Resident #2's medical record revealed that on 9/04/24 an Advanced Practice Registered Nurse ordered that due to the results of a Urine Analysis with a Culture and Sensitivity the resident was ordered Imipenem-Cilastatin (an antibiotic) Intravenous Solution Reconstituted 250 milligrams (mg) IV every 6 hours for 7 days. Resident #2's medical record contained a nursing note dated 9/09/24 that indicated the IV on the resident' s left forearm was not functioning for use for medication administration, and the company IV Access was contacted to place a new IV site.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for Oxygen (O2) therapy and failed to administer O2 therapy as ordered by the physician for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for O2 therapy, of a total sample of 17 residents, (#2, #13). Findings: 1. On 9/18/24 at 12:14 PM, resident #2 was observed seated in her wheelchair with a nasal cannula in her nose. The O2 tubing connected to an oxygen tank on the back of her wheelchair. The O2 flow rate indicated on tank was 3 liters per minute (L/min). Review of resident #2's medical record revealed she was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital. Her diagnoses included: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with (Acute) Exacerbation, Cardiomegaly, and unspecified sequelae of unspecified cerebrovascular disease. There was no physician's order for oxygen. On 9/18/24 at 2:07 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E, resident #2's assigned nurse, verified she had seen resident #2 with her O2 nasal cannula in her nose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review; the facility failed to investigate after a resident was found with suspected illicit drugs for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, (#11), of 17 sampled residents. Findings: Resident #11 a [AGE] year-old male was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included absence of bilateral legs above the knees, diabetes type 2, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, phantom limb pain syndrome, heart failure, repeated falls and nicotine dependence. On 8/11/24 at 1:40 AM, the weekend supervisor nurse documented a behavior note that read, Resident found by this nurse at [1:30 AM] to be sitting in wheelchair on patio area between timeclock and South wing dayroom passed out, slow to arouse. Resident leaning forward towards concrete, eyeglasses on ground in front of him, pack of cigarettes on ground. This nurse assisted CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] to return resident to room. When pack of cigarettes picked up from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update an individualized care plan for potential for adverse drug interactions for 1 of 1 reviewed for opioid and antianxiety medications, of a total sample of 17 residents, (#11). Findings: Resident #11, a [AGE] year-old male was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included absence of bilateral legs above the knees, diabetes mellitus type 2, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, phantom limb pain syndrome, heart failure, repeated falls and nicotine dependence. On 8/11/24 at 1:40 AM, the Weekend Supervisor documented a behavior note that read, Resident found by this nurse at [1:30 AM] to be sitting in wheelchair on patio area between timeclock and South wing dayroom passed out, slow to arouse. Resident leaning forward towards concrete, eyeglasses on ground in front of him, pack of cigarettes on ground. This nurse assisted CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] to return…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat residents who required assistance with meals in a dignified and respectful manner for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for dining, of a total sample of 17 residents, (#4, #15, #16, and #17). Findings: 1. Review of resident #4's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis and aphasia. Review of resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/13/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. She was totally dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene. On 6/19/24 at 8:25 AM, resident #4 sat in bed while Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) H assisted her with breakfast. CNA H fed resident #4 while standing next to her bed. CNA H then sat down and stated someone else was coming to feed resident #4's roommate.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medical record that accurately documented activities of daily living (ADLs) for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for ADLs, of a total sample of 17 residents, (#4, #14, and #17). Findings: 1. Review of resident #4's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis and aphasia. Review of resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/13/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. She was totally dependent on staff for ADLs. Review of resident #4's CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant)-ADL Tracking Form for May 2024 revealed eating was documented 11 out of 31 days on the 3 PM to 11 PM shift, and 0 out of 31 days on the 7 AM to 3 PM shift. Meal consumption percentage was documented on 27 days from the 3 PM to 11 PM shift, 0 out of 31 days for the 7 AM to 3 PM shift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review or revise the individualized pressure ulcer plan of care for 1 out of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, (#3) and failed to develop and implement an individualized comprehensive care plan for a resident reviewed for care planning, (#4), of a total sample of 17 residents. Findings: 1. Resident #3 was an [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include abscess of lung with pneumonia, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, type 2 diabetes, prostate cancer, difficulty walking, cognitive communication deficit, and urinary retention. The medical record indicated resident #3's skin was intact when he was admitted to the facility. The record indicated resident #3 was discharged to an acute care hospital on 5/08/24. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Discharge Return Anticipated assessment with assessment reference date of 5/08/24 revealed resident #3 had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement fall interventions for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for falls, of a total sample of 17 residents, (#2). Findings: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital on 3/07/24 with a diagnosis of drug induced subacute dyskinesia (uncontrolled, involuntary movements). Other diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, spinal stenosis, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, and Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia. Review of hospital discharge papers dated 3/05/24, revealed a handwritten note that stated, Ok to accept. No clinical reason not to accept except safety concerns with falls due to [diagnoses] of dyskinesia and involuntary movement. Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's cognition as alert to person with memory problems. The assessment indicated resident #2 was noted to have fallen within the last 30 days. A progress note attached to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to serve food at proper safe food temperature during the dinner meal. Findings: On 5/15/24 at 5:04 pm, the cook began serving dinner from the serving line. The cook did not take the temperature of the food before serving the line. The first dinner cart was pushed out the kitchen door at 5:30 pm. The temperatures of the food on the serving line were taken by the cook on 5/15/24 at 6:02 pm, after the meal service. On 5/15/24 at 6:05 pm, the temperature of the parmesan baked zucchini liquid was 109 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The cook continued taking temperatures of the rest of the serving line and did not explain why the temperature of the zucchini liquid was not at the appropriate temperature. On 5/16/24 at 3:32 pm, during an interview, the Interim Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) explained the temperature of the parmesan baked zucchini liquid at 109 degrees F was too low and stated the temperature of any food item on the steam table, even after meal service, should be above 135 degrees F to prevent food borne illnesses. On 5/16/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to promote dignity for one of four residents sampled for activities for daily living, (#3). Findings: On 5/15/2024 at 12:25 pm, resident #3 was seated at a square table in the day room on the 100 hall. Resident #3 wore a yellow hospital gown that tied around the neck. The resident's left hip was exposed and visible to staff and visitors as they walked by the day room. On 5/15/2024 at 12:29 pm, the resident stated, I don't like wearing a hospital gown. I have very few clothes in my room. I am more of a short-sleeved shirt and pants person. On 5/15/2024 at 12:40 pm, the Director of Nursing (DON) walked by and commented that she could see the resident's side and bottom exposed from the hallway. The DON said the resident should not be wearing only a hospital gown in the day room but might not have clothes in her room. The DON explained if the resident did not have any clothes in their room, they could get clothes from the laundry department. On 5/15/2024 at 12:43 pm, observation of resident #3's closet revealed one drawer with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for PASARR who were later identified with Intellectual Disability (ID) or Serious Mental Illness (SMI) out of a total sample of 45 residents. (#87, #15 and #39) Findings: 1. Resident #87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis, anemia, hypertension, dementia and hypothyroidism. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment with assessment reference date (ARD) of 7/17/23 revealed resident #87 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 which indicated she had moderate cognitive impairment. The document indicated her active diagnoses included anxiety disorder, depression other than bipolar and bipolar disorder. Review of resident #87's care plan revealed a behavior care plan related to increased anxiety initiated 12/10/21; a mood care plan related to depression, bipolar and anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete and submit a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) in accordance with the state process for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for PASARR from a total sample of 40 residents. (#23) Finding: Review of the medical record revealed resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. The resident had diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, cognitive communication deficit, and other symbolic dysfunctions (communication disorder). The Minimum Data Set quarterly assessment with Assessment Reference Date 7/12/23 showed the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status that indicated she was cognitively intact, and had not rejected evaluation or care. Functional Status noted the resident required staff supervision and support to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADL).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 residents reviewed for care planning participated in their care conference of a total sample of 45 residents. (#97) Findings: Resident #97, a [AGE] year-old male was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. His diagnoses including cerebral infarction, hypertension, diabetes type II, hemiplegia/hemiparesis following cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side, atrial fibrillation, and aphasia. Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/22/23, indicated the resident's cognition was moderately impaired with a Brief Interview For Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12/15. The assessment indicated the resident required extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. He had impairment in functional limitation in range of motion (ROM) to one side of his upper and lower extremities. On 8/15/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure clinical staff administered medication according to standards of practice, facility policy and procedure for administration of medication through enteral route via gastrostomy tube for 1 of 2 residents out of a total sample of 12 residents observed for medication administration. (#72) Findings: Florida Board of Nursing, Nurse Practice Act, 464.003 (19) (20) (a) (b) reads, Practice of practical nursing means the performance of selected acts, including the administration of treatments and medications, in the care of the ill, injured, or infirm; the promotion of wellness, maintenance of health, and prevention of illness of others under the direction of a registered nurse, a licensed physician . A practical nurse is responsible and accountable for making decisions that are based upon the individual's educational preparation and experience in nursing. 20) Practice of professional nursing means the performance of those acts requiring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a Restorative Nursing Program (RNP) to maintain function as recommended by Physical Therapy for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for rehabilitative/restorative services of a total sample of 45 residents. (#97) Findings: Resident #97, a [AGE] year-old male was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. His diagnoses including cerebral infarction, hypertension, diabetes type II, hemiplegia/hemiparesis following cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side, atrial fibrillation, and aphasia. Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/22/23, indicated the resident's cognition was moderately impaired with a Brief Interview For Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12/15. The assessment indicated the resident required extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. He had impairment in functional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status related to weight loss for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition out of a total sample of 45. (#70) Findings: Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy, altered mental status, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, major depressive disorder and malignant neoplasm of larynx. Review of the Minimum Data Set 5-Day Medicare assessment with assessment reference date of 7/05/23 revealed resident #70 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10 which indicated she had moderate cognitive impairment. The document indicated resident #70 had an unplanned weight-loss of 5% or more in 30 days. Review of resident #70's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed resident weighed 113.8 pounds on 5/30/2023 and weighed 108.0 pounds on 6/27/2023 which was a weight loss of 5.10 percent. Review of resident #70's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide routine dental services to 1 of 3 Medicaid-funded residents reviewed for dental from a total sample of 40 residents. (#91) Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital and had diagnoses that included gastric ulcer, intestinal infection, difficulty swallowing, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), diabetes, vitamin deficiency, anemia, and muscle weakness. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment with Assessment Reference Date 7/01/23 noted the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status that indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The assessment showed the resident did not have any episodes of behavior or rejection of care or services, and she required staff supervision and support to complete activities of daily living. On 8/14/23 at 10:53 AM, resident #91 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in her room.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report the results of an abuse allegation investigation within 5 working days involving 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 45. (#21 and #87) Findings: 1. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses of heart failure, hypertension, dementia and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment with assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/21/23 revealed resident #21 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04 which indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #21 did not exhibit any physically aggressive behaviors during the review period. Review of resident #21's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a Change in Condition assessment dated [DATE] which indicated resident was victim of other aggressive resident who initiated an altercation. A Weekly Skin Integrity Review dated 6/11/23 noted resident #21 sustained a small discoloration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 6 of 33 rooms were clean, and in good repair on the North Wing, (rooms #102, #107, #108, #110, #112, #116). Findings: In room [ROOM NUMBER] on 11/15/21 at 10:52 AM, the privacy curtain was noted with tan colored stains. The wall between the beds had tan colored stains extending down the wall to the baseboard. There was dark buildup at the base of the faucet on the basin in the bathroom. The floor tiles behind the toilet bowl had brownish discoloration. On 11/15/21 at 11:43 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER] was noted to have black discolored areas on the bathroom floor, and the toilet bowl was splattered with a dark substance. Observations on 11/16/21 at 9:42 AM and 12:32 PM, and on 11/17/21 at 9:12 AM showed the toilet bowl was still splattered with the dark substance and had rust and brownish discoloration. On 11/15/21 at 11:53 AM, the toilet bowl in room [ROOM NUMBER] had rust, yellowish streaks, and a yellowish ring around the water level. On 11/15/21 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Long Term Care Ombudsman's office was notified in writing of the reason for transfer/discharge to the hospital for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalizations, (#2, #63, #101) of a total sample of 45 residents. Findings: Review of the clinical record revealed resident #2 was transferred to the hospital on 9/09/21 for altered mental status. The resident was again transferred to the hospital on [DATE] for escalating behavior, and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #63 was transferred to the hospital on 6/09/21 and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of gastrostomy infection. Resident #101 was transferred to the hospital on 8/07/21 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The clinical records of residents #2, #63 and #101 did not include notification to the Ombudsman's office of the residents' transfers to the hospital. On 11/18/21 at 11:14 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the notification to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated to include current interventions for falls/elopement for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for falls of a total sample of 45 residents, (#2). Findings: Resident #2 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, anxiety disorder, generalized muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, and mood disorder. The resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS)assessment with assessment reference date of 7/27/21 revealed the resident's cognition was severely impaired with a Brief Interview For Mental Status score of 5/15. The assessment noted the resident exhibited physical and verbal behavior symptoms directed toward others, rejected care, and required extensive assistance of one-person with bed mobility, transfers, locomotion on/off unit, dressing, eating, toilet use and personal hygiene. The resident was assessed to be frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel and had 2 or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide nail care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL), of a total sample of 45 residents, (#73). Findings: Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, psychosis, aphasia and cirrhosis of the liver. Review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] noted the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 4 indicating severe cognitive impairment. He was dependent on 1-2 staff for all Activities of ADLs including personal hygiene. On 11/16/21 at 2:04 PM, the resident was sitting in his wheelchair across from the nurse's station. His finger nails were noted to be long, very thick, and discolored. The resident's care plan for ADLs dated 11/17/21 noted an intervention added on 3/26/21, Resident has very thick, elongated fingernails-Podiatry to trim down. On 11/17/21 at 2:32 PM, the resident's direct care Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) F stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen (O2) therapy was administered per physician orders for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for O2 therapy of a total sample of 45 residents, (#101). Findings: Resident #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, generalized anxiety disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, dementia, and pleural effusion. The resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with assessment reference date of 10/20/21, revealed the resident's cognition was severely impaired, with a Brief Interview For Mental Status score of 4/15. Resident #101 required extensive assistance with her activities of daily living. Observations on 11/15/21 at 2:30 PM, and on 11/16/21 at 12:55 PM, showed resident #101 received O2 therapy via nasal cannula (NC), infusing at 4 Liters per minute (LPM). Review of the resident's physician orders, revealed an order dated 11/12/21 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$91,612 in federal fines across 6 penalties.

  • $60,060 — penalty dated 2024-05-17
  • $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2024-01-02
  • $11,538 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
  • $3,147 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
  • $7,342 — penalty dated 2023-10-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIATA HEALTH GROUP — 50 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Staffing 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.1+0.9 vs chain
The other 49 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspire At EvansFort Myers, FL 1 of 5Aviata At BenevaSarasota, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Big BendPerry, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Bryan DairyLargo, FL 1 of 5Aviata At FletcherTampa, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Palma Sola BayBradenton, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Saint LucieFort Pierce, FL 1 of 5Aviata At SarasotaSarasota, FL 1 of 5Aviata At SeminoleSeminole, FL 1 of 5Aviata At The BayTampa, FL 1 of 5Aviata At The PalmsPalm Harbor, FL 1 of 5Aviata At VeniceVenice, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Arbor SpringsOcala, FL 2 of 5Aviata At BradentonBradenton, FL 2 of 5Aviata At BrentwoodLecanto, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Colonial LakesWinter Garden, FL 2 of 5Aviata At EnglewoodEnglewood, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Grand OaksPalm Coast, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Green Cove SpringsGreen Cove Springs, FL 2 of 5Aviata At GreenacresGreen Acres, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Lakeside OaksDunedin, FL 2 of 5Aviata At OakfieldBrandon, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Santa BarbaraCape Coral, FL 2 of 5Aviata At South DaytonaSouth Daytona, FL 2 of 5Aviata At TallahasseeTallahassee, FL 2 of 5Aviata At The HarborSafety Harbor, FL 2 of 5Aviata At The Sea - PasadenaSouth Pasadena, FL 2 of 5Aviata At The Sea - Pompano BeachPompano Beach, FL 2 of 5Aviata At West Palm BeachWest Palm Beach, FL 2 of 5Aviata at Sand KeyClearwater, FL 3 of 5Aspire At Ridge HavenNew Port Richey, FL 3 of 5Aviata At BrooksvilleBrooksville, FL 3 of 5Aviata At Central ParkBrandon, FL 3 of 5Aviata At Coral BayWest Palm Beach, FL 3 of 5Aviata At CountrysidePalm Harbor, FL 3 of 5Aviata At JacksonvilleJacksonville, FL 3 of 5Aviata At North Fort MyersN Ft Myers, FL 3 of 5Aviata At RosewoodOrlando, FL 3 of 5Aviata At San JoseJacksonville, FL 3 of 5Aviata At The Sea - Harbor BeachFort Lauderdale, FL

Showing 40 of 49; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
541 OLD CANOE CREEK RD OPCO PARENT LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2023
541 OLD CANOE CREEK RD OPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2023
FREUND, NOCHUMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2023
MISHRA, ABHISHEKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/12/2025
RICHARDSON, BREANNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2024
DAGAN, AMITAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/02/2025
GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/02/2025
GOLDBERGER, FAIGYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/02/2025
HERSKOWITZ, ELIEZERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/02/2025
HERSKOWITZ, YAAKOVIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/02/2025
TRAVITSKY, AARONIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/02/2025
ASPIRE MGT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-6.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$258K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 10%Other / private 22%

This home reported $258K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$304per resident / day
operating cost
$9,229per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$286per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105888. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next