Aviata At Countryside

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 116 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 42.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 147 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 114.5 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.91 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.75 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure a care plan was updated to include individualized interventions related to behaviors after a reported sexual event were included in the care plan for one (#1) of two residents reviewed. Findings included: On 2/18/25 at 12:25 p.m., an interview with Staff A, Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) revealed she had witnessed a reported event that occurred on 10/1/24, where Resident #1 was involved. She stated, [Resident name] was actively performing a sexual act on another resident. Staff A, PTA stated Resident #1 was grinning/smiling. She stated she asked Resident #1 what he was doing, but she couldn't recall if he answered. She stated Resident #1 is not known to her as he was not the resident she was working with for PT (Physical Therapy), but it was the other resident who was on her caseload. Review of Resident #1's admission record revealed an admission date of 5/28/22 with diagnoses to include muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to implement an effective Infection Control program related to 1. failure to ensure third-party vendors wore Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) appropriately and per posted instructions for one (#37) out of two residents under Contact isolation on one of two units, 2. failed to ensure staff conducted hand hygiene and donned PPE while providing high contact care activities per posted Enhanced Barrier Precautions for one (#44) of four residents observed during medication administration, 3. failed to cover respiratory masks when not in use for one (#5) of three sampled residents, 4. failed to ensure contact precautions were put in place in a timely manner for one (#457) of two sampled residents, and 5. failed to ensure proper storage of food trays for one of four meal carts. Findings included: 1. On 9/16/24 at 10:11 a.m., showed the door to Resident #37's room was posted with a Contact Precaution sign. The observation showed a female visitor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure advance directives were updated per resident's request for two (#406, #455) of 22 residents sampled. Findings included: A review of Resident #406's admission Record revealed she had diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease stage 3 and chronic systolic congestive heart failure. A review of Resident #406's physician's order dated [DATE] revealed full code. A review of Resident #406's 5-day Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed: Section C - Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) 14 which indicated intact cognition. A review of Resident #406's care plans revealed a care plan initiated on [DATE] by the Director of Social Services for full code. A review of Resident #406's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documents revealed an Advance Directives Discussion Document signed by Resident #406 and the Director of Social Services on [DATE] which indicated Resident #406 wished to have Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty-eight medication administration opportunities were observed and seven errors were identified for four (#59, #55, #44, and #66) of four residents observed. These errors constituted a 25% medication error rate. Findings included: 1. On 9/17/24 at 9:32 a.m., an observation of medication administration with Staff E, Registered Nurse (RN), was conducted with Resident #59. The staff member dispensed the following oral medications: - Lamotrigine 25 milligram (mg) - 2 tablets - Amlodipine 10 mg tablet - Sertraline 25 mg tablet - Folic Acid 400 microgram (mcg) tablet - 2 tablets The staff member turned from the medication cart and entered the resident room, Staff A was asked to confirm dispensing 5 tablets, the staff member applied a glove removing one of the tablets of Folic acid stating 2 tablets of Folic Acid had been poured into the cup. Staff A confirmed dispensing 5 tablets after the removal of the second Folic acid tablet. Review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one (South Front) of five carts were locked when unattended, failed to date medications with limited life when opened in one (South Front) of five med carts, failed to ensure three medical devices were discarded when expired, and failed to ensure medications were stored appropriately in four ( #302, #304, #305, and #306) of 14 resident rooms sampled. Findings included: On [DATE] at 3:40 p.m., the South Front medication cart was reviewed with Staff E, RN. During the observation Staff E left the keys to the unlocked medication cart in the lock, leaving the area to speak with an unknown staff who was standing in a doorway on the other side of the nursing station. Staff E had her back to the med cart, with this writer and a confused unknown resident at the med cart. The observation revealed an undated bottle of Latanoprost (Xalatan) 0.005% ophthalmic drops. The clear bag holding the box of Latanoprost revealed an open date of [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate dental services in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (#75) of six residents sampled. Findings Included: During an interview and observation on 9/16/2024 at 11:52 a.m., Resident # 75 was observed to have missing and broken teeth on the lower jaw. Resident #75 stated the teeth caused him pain and had seen the dentist months ago but no follow up had occurred. Resident #75 stated everyone knew but no one did anything and he continued with pain regarding his teeth. Review of the facility admission record showed Resident #75 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include but not limited to Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus, Type 2 diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), mild bipolar disorder, joint pain, and other comorbidities. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], showed in Section C- Cognitive Patterns, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13/15…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a response to a billing grievance was responded to for one (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for grievance process of thirteen sampled residents. Findings included: An interview was conducted on 03/19/2024 at 12:09 p.m. with a family member of Resident #1. The family member stated she was able to review the Medicaid Access Portal, which showed the resident's patient liability to be $1751.07 per month. The family member stated she overpaid, and she wanted a refund for the overpayment and the facility was sending her bills. The family member stated she called Business Office Manager (BOM) (former) about the billing error. The family member said she e-mailed a copy of the Notice of Case Action to (BOM/former), she stated the date on the e-mail was January 8th, 2024. Continuing, she stated I have not heard back, but I received another bill yesterday for $58.37. A record review of the business account for Resident #1, the Activity Report, documented on 01/08/2024, recd (received) call from [family member], she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor resident rights to privacy for all residents, by not ensuring that residents quality of life was enhanced on two of three (100 Hall, 300 Hall) resident hallways related to staff knocking and waiting to be invited into resident rooms. Findings included: Review of the facility policy titled Privacy with an effective date of 11/30/2014 revealed the following: It is the policy of The Company to give all residents the opportunity for privacy. 2. Residents' privacy will always be respected. 1. Observations on 09/19/22 at 11:55 A.M., during the delivery of midday meal trays on the 300 hall, revealed multiple staff members were noted to deliver meal trays to multiple residents on the 300 hall. At that time, multiple staff persons were noted to enter multiple resident rooms without knocking on the room doors and did not wait to be invited into the rooms by the residents. An interview on 09/19/22 at 11:58 A.M., with Staff E, Registered Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure two (Residents #71, #92) of three residents sampled for Beneficiary Notice, received the correct Beneficiary Notice when discharged from a Medicare covered Part A stay and remained in the facility. Findings Included: Review of documentation provided by the facility's Director of Social Services related to Beneficiary notification for Resident #71 revealed his last covered Medicare Part A day was 8/12/22 and he remained in the facility. Documentation on the SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form revealed a SNF ABN Form CMS -10055 (Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN)) form was not provided to the resident. Continued review of the form revealed a hand written note under Other Explain which indicated Resident is LTC [Long Term Care] here. No DC [Discharge]/Transfer Review of documentation provided by the facility's Director of Social Services related to Beneficiary notification for Resident #92 revealed her last covered Medicare Part A day was 6/16/22 and she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan related to interventions for the use of compression stockings for one (Resident #31) of a sample of 34 residents. Findings included: A review of the medical record for Resident#31 revealed a physician's order dated 9/2/2022 for Compression Stockings at HS (evenings) for dependent bi-lateral feet swelling. Remove stockings before bed. Encourage resident to elevate feet as tolerated. Start date 9/2/2022 and on 9/3/2022 Compression stockings in a.m. for depended bilateral feet swelling APPLY STOCKINGS IN THE AM and remove in PM before bed. Encourage resident to elevate feet as tolerated-Start ate 9/3/2022. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a re-admission date of 10/31/2022 with multiple diagnoses including but not limited to edema, ataxia following cerebral infarction, and Alzheimer's Disease. On 09/20/2022 at 12:58 p.m., an observation was made of Resident #31. His legs appeared very swollen and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIATA HEALTH GROUP — 50 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $94K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL