Aviata At Venice
1026 Albee Farm Rd, Venice, FL 34285 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (941) 484-0425 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $28,009 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-20)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.0% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.0% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.4% | 0.3% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.4% | 4.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.8% | 2.5% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.4% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.9% | 14.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.3% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.6% | 10.5% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.2% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.7% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.1% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.0% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.4% | 9.1% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.30 | 2.13 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.52 | 1.15 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 62.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 56 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.2%CMS range 26.8–57.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.2%CMS range 6.5–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 62.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 46.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 3.3–12.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.98 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-06-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of facility's policies and procedures, residents and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from neglect by failure to ensure staff used the appropriate mechanical lift, and failure to follow safety protocol when using a mechanical lift to transfer 2 (Residents #1 and #2) of 3 sampled residents who use mechanical lifts for transfers. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy and procedure for Transfer/Mobility Evaluation Low Lift with and effective date of 11/30/2014 and a revision date of 11/1/2019 read, Center will evaluate the transfer and lifting needs of the resident to safely and comfortably transfer according to their individual needs . Two staff members are required when using a mechanical lift. Lift status will be indicated on the resident's care plan and [NAME] [Provides instructions for care]. The completed evaluation will be filed in the medical record. Review of the facility's skills competency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, residents and staff interviews, review of facility's policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure ongoing monitoring of staff competency for use of mechanical lifts to ensure the safety of residents during transfers for 2 (Residents #1 and #2) of 3 sampled residents of 16 residents who use mechanical lifts for transfers. The findings included: The facility policy Transfer/Mobility Evaluation Low Lift, Document Name N-907, Effective Date 11/30/2014, Revised 11/1/2019 read, Center will evaluate the transfer and lifting needs of the resident to safely and comfortably transfer according to their individual needs . Two staff members are required when using a mechanical lift . Lift status will be indicated on the resident's care plan and [NAME] [provides instructions for care]. Review of the facility's Skills Competency Assessments for C.N.A [Certified Nursing Assistant] Staff revealed the facility utilizes Skills Competency Assessments to ensure you are able to fulfill your…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with showers, personal hygiene and incontinent care as outlined in the resident's care plan and according to residents' preferences for 3 (Residents #6, #13 and #57) of 5 dependent residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's).The findings included:Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, Supporting (no effective date) revealed, Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. The policy stated, Appropriate care and services are provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs (activities of daily living) independently. The policy defined hygiene as bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care. The policy defined elimination as toileting. The policy further stated, refusal and details of the interventions refused are documented in the resident's clinical record.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide resident centered activities to meet the interests of 2 (Residents #43 and #6) of 3 residents reviewed for activities.The findings included:Review of the facility's policy titled, Group Programs and Activities Calendar revised June 2018 revealed, Residents are encouraged to participate in all group activities, especially those that are best suited for their interests and physical, mental, and emotional needs . Activities professionals plan scheduled activities for the month . Review of Resident #43's clinical record revealed an admission date of 11/20/24. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, Major Depressive Disorders and Adjustment Disorder. Resident #43 resided on the secured memory care unit of the facility. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/27/25 revealed Resident #43 scored 08 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, review of facility policy and facility staff interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect to the proper authorities within the required timeframe for 1 (Resident #80) of 3 residents reviewed with an allegation of neglect.The findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled Risk Management: Incident Management noted the facility's Administrator was responsible for oversight of all Risk Management activity and assuring resident safety, including the freedom from risk of abuse as holding the highest priority. Abuse will not be tolerated by anyone including staff, residents/patient, volunteers, family members or legal guardians or any other individual. Allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation/misappropriation, injuries of unknown origin and potentially Resident to Resident Altercation will be reported per federal regulation.The policy also noted, 3. Documenting . e. Nursing Home Administrator is responsible for doing the Federal Immediate and Five-Day Reports, Adverse Incident Report and DCF [Department of Children Family]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate care in accordance with current standards of care to prevent complications of tube feeding for 1 (Resident #81) of 3 residents reviewed with feeding tubes (tube inserted directly in the stomach to deliver liquid nutrition, fluids, and medications).The findings included:Review of the clinical record for Resident #81 revealed an admission date of 1/30/26. Diagnoses included unspecified brain injury, fracture of the neck and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment with an assessment reference date of 2/2/26 revealed Resident #81scored 08 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS noted Resident #81 had a feeding tube had a feeding tube and was dependent on staff for nutrition.Review of the physician's order dated 1/30/26 revealed to elevate the head of the bed 30-45 degrees during enteral feeding or flushing every shift.Review of the Care Plan initiated on 2/2/26 revealed Resident #81…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the irregularities identified during the pharmacy consultant's drug regimen review were acted upon for 1 (Resident #13) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The findings included:Review of the facility policy Pharmacy Services - Role of the Consultant Pharmacist, documented The Consultant Pharmacist will provide specific activities related to medication regime review including:a. A documented review of the medication regime of each resident at least monthly.b. Appropriate communication of information to prescribers and facility leadership about potential or actual problems related to any aspect of medications including medication irregularities.Review of the clinical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 10/23/25. Diagnoses included repeated falls, muscle weakness, depression and anxiety.Review of the Consultant Pharmacist Medication Review dated 10/31/25, the Pharmacist documented The use of Atorvastatin and Fenofibrate (medication used to lower cholesterol and triglycerides)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure the safe storage of medications for 3 (Residents #37, #70, and #74) of 3 residents observed with unsecured medications at the bedside.The findings included:Review of Facility Policy Storage of Medications dated 2001, revised 2020 documented the facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Policy Interpretation and Implementation (1) Drugs and biologicals used in the facility are stored in locked compartments under proper temperature, light and humidity controls. Only persons authorized to prepare and administer medications have access to locked medications. The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. On 2/2/26 at 11:43 a.m., observation of Resident #37's room revealed a bottle of Milk [NAME] stored on the bedside table. A bottle of Nystatin antifungal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of clinical records and staff interviews the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain urinary catheters in a safe and sanitary manner for 3 (Resident #900, #899 and #800) of 4 residents reviewed with indwelling urinary catheters. The findings included: During the initial facility tour on 3/4/25 at 9:47 a.m., Resident #900's indwelling catheter drainage bag was observed on the floor. Photographic evidence obtained. On 3/4/25 at 9:52 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) Staff A verified Resident #900's catheter drainage bag was on the floor. On 3/4/25 at 10:00 a.m., an observation from the 100 hall revealed Resident #899's catheter drainage bag was located on the side of the bed facing the doorway to his room and was very full. There was no privacy cover and the drainage bag and urine were visible by staff, other residents and visitors, passing by the room. On 4/4/25 at 10:05 a.m., in an interview RN Staff A confirmed Resident #899's catheter drainage bag was very full and visible to anyone passing by the residents room. Photographic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent the elopement of 1 (Resident #2) of 1 sampled resident who left the facility without staff knowledge. The findings included: Facility policy Elopement/Wandering Risk Guidelines Document Name N-1031, Revision date 8/1/2020 indicated: Patient/Residents to be evaluated on admission, re-admission, 7 days post admission, quarterly, with a significant change in condition, and elopement event using the risk tool. Review of the clinical record for Resident #2 revealed a re-admission date of 10/2/24 post hospitalization. Diagnoses included alcohol withdrawal and delirium. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment with a target date of 10/7/24 noted the resident's cognition was moderately impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10. The care plan initiated on 9/20/24 noted the resident was an elopement risk/wanderer related to disorientation to place, history of attempts to leave the facility unattended, and impaired safety awareness. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to sufficient nursing staffing to ensure timely response to request for assistance for 3 (Residents #5, #6 and #7) of 3 sampled residents. The findings included: On 11/6/24 at 10:54 a.m., in an interview Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Staff A said the facility is often short staffed and Residents complain about call lights not being answered. On 11/6/24 at 12:45 p.m., Registered Nurse (RN) Staff B said she didn't think residents were getting the care they need. She said she felt the CNAs just didn't care. On 11/6/24 at 12:30 p.m., in an interview RN Staff C said the facility could always use more staff. She said she gave Administration credit as they are trying to hire, but the people stay two weeks and they leave. On 11/6/24 at 1:15 p.m., in an interview Resident #5 said when he presses his call bell there had been times no one comes and he's had to scream out in order to get someone to come. He said it had happened just within the last few days. He said it can be over an hour, if they come at all. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 4 (Staff A, Staff E, Staff F, Staff G) of 4 sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were knowledgeable and competent to ensure the safe use of mechanical lifts to transfer residents. The findings included: The facility policy Transfer/Mobility Evaluation Low Lift, Document Name N-907, Effective Date 11/30/2014, Revised 11/1/2019 read, Center will evaluate the transfer and lifting needs of the resident to safely and comfortably transfer according to their individual needs . Two staff members are required when using a mechanical lift . Lift status will be indicated on the resident's care plan and [NAME] [provides instructions for care]. Review of the facility's Skills Competency Assessments for C.N.A [Certified Nursing Assistant] Staff revealed the facility utilizes Skills Competency Assessments to ensure you are able to fulfill your duties as required by state and federal regulations. We follow the minimal regulatory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, review of the facility policies and procedures, and staff interviews the facility failed to develop and implement a program of meaningful activities to meet the needs of 6 of 16 residents in the memory care unit. The facility failed to implement meaningful individualized activities to meet the interest and wellbeing of 1 (Resident #58) of 1 resident in the memory unit sampled for individualized activities. The lack of an individualized activity program has the potential to cause social isolation, boredom, agitation, and frustration. The findings included: The facility policy, MC-200 Activity-Intensive Program effective date 11/30/14 (revised 3/19/19) documented, A structured activity intensive program shall be the focus of the memory care unit to minimize the confusion residents with dementia and related disorders experience as they attempt to cope with difficulties in short term memory, attention span, comprehension, learning, conceptualization, judgment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to administer medications according to physician's orders for 2 (Residents #18 and #30) of 4 residents observed for medication administration. Three licensed nurses on the morning shift with 29 opportunities were observed. Two medication errors were observed resulting in a 6.9% error rate. The findings included: The facility policy Administering Medications (revised 4/19) documented, Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed.Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders including any required time frame. 1. On 10/3/23 at 8:31 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) Staff C was observed administering eight different medications to Resident #18. RN Staff C said she was not able to administer Duloxetine 40 milligrams (mg) as ordered medications. She said the medication was not available and was not included in the emergency drug kit. Review of the clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 9/3/23 to administer Duloxetine HCL (Hydrochloride) 40…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedures and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were appropriately labeled in 3 (Carts #1, #2, and #3) of 3 medications carts reviewed. Without an open date on the medication there was no way to know when it would expire. This had the potential for residents to receive medications that could create hazardous health consequences. The facility also failed to secure medication and treatment carts were secured when not in view of the licensed nurse. The findings included: The facility policy, Administering Medications (revised 4/19) documented, The expiration/beyond use date on the medication label is checked prior to administering. When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened is recorded on the container. 1. On 10/2/23 at 10:39 a.m., during an observation of medication cart identified by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff F as cart #1 (rooms 204-208), the following was observed: One Novolog insulin flex pen without an open date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure they applied and removed an AFO (ankle-foot orthosis) device for 1 (Resident #66) of 1 out of 6 residents coded as having an AFO. The use of an AFO is to improve standing, transfers, and/or walking patterns by reducing, preventing, or limiting the movement of the lower leg and foot and by supporting weak muscles. The findings included: On 10/03/23 at 9:10 a.m., Resident #66 was observed sitting in her wheelchair in the doorway to her room. During the observation, Resident #66 was noted to be dragging her right foot and her right arm and her hand appeared to be contracted. Resident #66 stated she had a cerebral vascular accident (CVA) causing her weakness on the right side of her body. She said she used to have a right foot splint, but therapy took it away a long time ago and she didn't know why. Review of Resident #66's medical record revealed diagnoses included a medical history of Multiple Sclerosis (disorder marked by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility policies and procedures, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene for 2 (Resident #19, and #68) of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The findings included: The facility policy, N-1130 Bathing/Showering effective 11/30/2014 (revised 9/1/17) documented, Assistance with showering and bathing will be provided at least twice a week and as needed to cleanse and refresh the resident. The resident shall be asked on admission to establish a frequency schedule for bathing. 1. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #19 had an admission date of 2/4/23 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, paranoid schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) with an assessment reference date of 8/16/23 documented Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent reduction in range of motion (ROM) for 1 (Resident #78) of 2 residents reviewed for limitation in ROM. The findings included: Review of the facility policy for Contracture Prevention revised 8/22/17 revealed the purpose is to prevent contracture of extremities for those residents who no longer have full use of their extremities. Each resident must be evaluated for the need of contracture prevention procedure on admission and readmission as needed. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paralysis of right side due to cerebral vascular accident (CVA). The physician's orders dated 8/12/23 included an Occupational and Physical Therapy evaluation and treatment. The physician's History and Physical progress note dated 8/14/23 at 5:47 p.m., noted Resident #78 had a right hand contracture. Physical Therapy (PT) and Occupational…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure they maintained communication between the nursing facility and the dialysis center related to the ongoing assessment of dialysis resident before and after each dialysis treatment for 2 (Residents #7 and #24) of 2 residents receiving dialysis. The findings included: The facility policy titled, Coordination of Hemodialysis Services N-1359, with an effective date of 11/30/2014 and a revision date of 7/2/2019, stated residents that required an outside ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease) facility would have services coordinated by the facility. The Dialysis Communication form would be initiated by the facility and sent to the ESRD center. The nurse would collect and complete the information regarding the resident to send to the ESRD center and upon the resident's return to the facility, the nurse would review the Dialysis Communication form and the information sent by the ESRD center and complete the post dialysis information on the Dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to have documentation of alternatives attempted prior to use of side rails, review the risks and benefits of side rails, and obtain consent prior to the use of side rails for 1 (Resident #44) of 1 resident observed with side rails on the bed. The findings included: Review of the facility policy for Side Rail/Bed Rail dated 4/19/18 indicated the facility will attempt alternative interventions and document in the medical record, prior to the use of side rail/bed rail. 1. Prior to installation of a side rail/bed rail complete the side rail/bed rail evaluation to evaluate the resident for risk of entrapment. 2. Review the risks and benefits with residents. 3. Obtain consent from the resident. 4. Obtain physician order for side rail/bed rail. Review of Resident #44's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] Section P for restraints, documented side rails used for 0 days. Review of the Order Summary Report that included physician orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and staff record reviews, the facility failed to ensure 3 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) (Staff A, H, and I) of 3 sampled records reviewed had a performance review completed at least once every 12 months. The facility failed to ensure staff had in-service education based on the outcome of the employee annual performance/competency evaluations. The findings included: On 10/3/23, a review of the facility's Employee Guidebook stated on page 25 and 26, all employees would have a performance evaluation completed upon hire, and on their yearly anniversary date or on their promotion date. On 10/3/23, a review of CNA Staff A's employee file revealed a hire date of 11/2/1992. There was no documentation Staff A had an employee performance/competency review in 2022 or 2023. The last performance/competency review in the employee record was dated 11/26/13. On 10/3/23, a review of CNA Staff H's employee file revealed a hire date of 4/11/1991. There was no documentation Staff H had an employee performance/competency review in 2022 or 2023. The last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan was developed within 48 hours of admission for 1(Resident #283) of 3 newly admitted residents reviewed. The findings included: The facility policy, Plan of Care effective 11/30/14 (revised 9/25/17 documented, An individualized person-centered plan of care will be established by the interdisciplinary team (IDT) with the resident and/or representative(s) to the extent practicable and updated in accordance with state and federal regulatory requirements . Develop and implement an individualized plan of care within 48 hours of admission that includes, but not limited to, initial goals based on the admission orders, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, social services, PASARR recommendations if applicable, and other areas needed to provide effective care of the resident that meets professional standards of care to ensure that the resident's needs are met appropriately until the comprehensive plan of care is completed. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #282) of 5 sampled residents was free of significant medication errors. Medications not given as ordered can have a significant impact on resident health and welfare. The findings included: 1. Review of the clinical record for Resident #282 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including End Stage liver failure (cirrhosis of the liver) and Hepatic Encephalopathy (Damaged liver does not remove toxins from the blood). The physician's orders dated 7/21/23 included Lactulose 20 grams twice a day with meals. The Lactulose was scheduled for 9:00 a.m., and 9:00 p.m. Lactulose is a medication used to treat hepatic encephalopathy. It works by decreasing the amount of toxins in the blood, which is a common cause of hepatic encephalopathy. Lactulose helps trap ammonia in the colon and bind to it. This reduces the amount of ammonia that is absorbed into the bloodstream and helps improve symptoms of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurate for 1 (Residents #282) of 2 resident records reviewed. Incomplete or inaccurate clinical records could result in residents receiving improper care. The findings included: A review of the clinical record for Resident #282 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of End Stage liver failure (cirrhosis of the liver) and Hepatic Encephalopathy. A review of the July 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed two medications were not given as ordered. A review of the physician's orders on admission to the facility indicated that on 7/21/2023 the resident was ordered Lactulose 20 gram twice a day with meals and Phosphorus (K-Phos) 250 mg twice a day with meals. A review of Resident #282's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the resident did not receive the ordered Lactulose a total of eight (8) times that was documented that the medication was not available and four (4) times the nurse documented it was given. A review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-01 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to refer for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Process (PASSR) Level II screening for 1 resident (#1) of 3 residents reviewed for mental illness. A PASRR Level II is required for individuals with mental disorders and intellectual disabilities to ensure proper placement in the nursing home and obtain additional services for the resident while in the nursing home. The findings included: Review of the facility Policy for PASRR dated 11/8/21: The center will assure all Serious Mentally Ill (SMI) and Intellectually Disabled (ID) residents receive appropriate pre-admission screenings according to Federal/State guidelines. The purpose is to ensure the residents with SMI or are ID receive the care and services they need in the most appropriate setting. Review of Resident #1's Preadmission Screening Inclusionary and Exclusionary Checklist dated 9/26/07 revealed diagnoses included Anoxic Brain Damage and Recurring Depression. Resident #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-12-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a clean and sanitary manner and in good repair by having openings into the ceiling with potential contamination of the food areas; uncleanable surfaces in food storage and preparation areas, and outdated food items. The findings included: 1. On 11/29/21 at 9:28 a.m., during the initial tour of the kitchen, the following was observed: The ceiling upon entry to the kitchen had a partially detached broken rusted vent with a three-inch-by-three-inch hole. Photographic evidence obtained The ceiling tiles in the main kitchen were stained with a brown substance in front of the stove and food prep areas. Photographic evidence obtained Several of the ceiling vents and support frames were heavily soiled with a black bio-growth. Photographic evidence obtained The pipe next to the plate warmer and steam table had a one-inch opening into the ceiling around the pipe. The plastic coating was peeling on the surface of a utility cart holding beverages. Photographic evidence obtained The inside frame of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide pharmacy services to ensure 3 (Resident #52, #24, and #37) of 7 residents medication administration records reviewed received medication in accordance with physician orders. The findings included: The facility's policy 7.0 Medication Shortages/Unavailable Medications with a revision date of 1/1/13 read, .Upon discovery that Facility has an inadequate supply of a medication to administer to a Resident, Facility staff should immediately initiate action to obtain the medication from Pharmacy . If the medication is not available in the Emergency Medication Supply, Facility staff should notify Pharmacy and arrange for an emergency delivery . Action may include . Use of an emergency (back-up) Third Party Pharmacy. If emergency delivery is unavailable, Facility nurse should contact the attending physician to obtain orders or directions . 1. Record review revealed Resident #52 had a physician's order, dated 11/17/21, for the antibiotic medication Cefazolin 1 gram to be given IV (intravenously) every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records contained accurately documented information for the administration of medications for 6 (24, #37, #52, #48, #53, #86) of 7 residents medication administration records reviewed. The findings included: The facility's Policy N-853 Medication-Oral Administration Of (revised 9/22/17) indicated to, . Chart on Medication Administration Record (MAR) according immediately following when medication is given and before proceeding to the next resident . The facility's policy 7.0 Medication Shortages/Unavailable Medications with a revision date of 1/1/13 read, .Upon discovery that Facility has an inadequate supply of a medication to administer to a Resident, Facility staff should immediately initiate action to obtain the medication from Pharmacy . If the medication is not available in the Emergency Medication Supply, Facility staff should notify Pharmacy and arrange for an emergency delivery . Action may include . Use of an emergency (back-up) Third Party Pharmacy. If emergency delivery is unavailable,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-02 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum data set) assessment accurately reflected falls and fractures for 1 (Resident #37) of 4 sampled residents with falls. Inaccurate MDS assessments can result in a resident not receiving appropriate health care. The findings included: Clinical Record review showed Resident #37 sustained a fall on 6/30/21 and was sent to the hospital for evaluation. The resident was diagnosed with a nasal fracture and subdural hematoma. Resident #37 returned to facility on 7/1/21, sustained a second fall on 7/2/21 and a new diagnosis of right knee fracture. The five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a reference date of 7/5/21, and the significant change in status MDS assessment, with a reference date of 7/15/21, failed to identify the fall with major injury. Under section J1800 of the MDS asking if the resident had any falls since admission/entry or reentry or the prior assessment, whichever is more recent, the facility coded No. Under number of falls since admission or prior assessment - Major…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized, person-centered care plan for 1 (#24) of 4 residents reviewed for care planning. Failure to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan can lead to the resident's medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs not being met. The findings included: Review of Resident #24's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An admission comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/20/21 was completed and transmitted. Based on the assessment, care plan decisions were completed on 9/24/21 to proceed to care plan for areas of communication, risk for pressure ulcers, behaviors and psychotropic (drugs that affect a person's mental state) medication. The Registered Nurse (RN) MDS Coordinator certified and signed the care plans for Resident #24 were completed but the facility failed to develop a comprehensive and individualized care plan for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications in 1 (Nurses station #2) of 2 medication storage rooms. This has the potential for expired medications to be administered to residents. The findings included: On 11/30/21 at 11:30 a.m., observation of Medication room at Nurses station #2 with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff M revealed: Three bottles of Pro Stat expired 9/3/2021. Photographic evidence obtained Four bottles of Magnesium Chloride best by 8/21. Photographic evidence obtained One bottle of Calcium + D3 expired 8/21. At the time of the observation, LPN Staff M confirmed the medications were expired. On 11/30/21 at approximately 11:40 a.m., in an interview, the Regional Director of Nursing confirmed the medications were expired and removed them from the medication room.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, review of the facility's policy and procedure, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to administer the influenza vaccine as requested to 1 (Resident #56) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for immunization. The findings included: Review of facility policy titled Influenza Vaccine - Resident with a revision date of 8/17/2020 stated, Residents will be offered the influenza vaccine annually (between October 1st and March 31 st unless otherwise directed by the CDC) to encourage and promote the benefits associated with vaccinations against influenza, in accordance with the local health department and Centers for Disease Control Guidelines . Have the resident / resident representative sign the informed consent, indicating acceptance or declination. Obtain a physician's order. Administer the vaccine, and document on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) . On 11/29/21 at 11:18 a.m., in an interview Resident #56 said she has been asking for an influenza vaccine since her admission to the facility on 9/29/21. The resident said she's asked multiple nurses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain/store resident personal care items in a sanitary manner to prevent potential cross contamination for 9 (Residents #11, #39, #48, #77, #86, #91, #24, #37, and #52) of 20 sampled residents. In addition, the resident chairs in the Memory care unit were in disrepair. The findings included: 1. On 11/29/21 at 9:45 a.m., the shared bathroom of Resident #77 and #86 was observed to have unmarked, unidentified personal care items being stored in an unsanitary manner. An opened bottle of total bath wash and a bottle of mouthwash were stored on the sink. A tube of toothpaste and a toothbrush with the bristles facing down and against the wall were stored on the soap dish. Photographic evidence obtained The same observation was made on 11/30/21 at 10:10 a.m., and 12/1/21 at 9:51 a.m. The unmarked, unlabeled personal care items remained stored on the sink and the soap dish. On 12/01/21 at 10:15 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Staff K verified the personal care items in the shared bathroom of Residents #77 and #86…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$28,009 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $28,009 — penalty dated 2024-06-20
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVIATA HEALTH GROUP — 50 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 4.1 | -2.1 vs chain |
The other 49 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 49; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VENICE SNF OPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 01/01/2026 |
| BFML VENICE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2026 |
| BK VENICE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2026 |
| FOLLMAN, BEREL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2026 |
| KURLAND, BENJAMIN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2026 |
| LEFKOWITZ, MICHAEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2026 |
| KRALIK, SHADRICK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2026 |
| REILLY, MELISSA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2026 |
| 1026 ALBEE FARM RD FL OWNER LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2026 |
| ARMSTEAD PHARMACY PROVIDER SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2026 |
| EPC SAIL LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2026 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $138K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105443. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.