Aviata At Brooksville

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 38.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 62 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.6 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection for not maintaining infection prevention and control practices in the management of intravenous catheters for 1 of 3 residents, Resident 3, reviewed for IV (intravenous) therapy.Findings include: During an observation on 6/25/2025 at 9:40 AM, Resident #3's PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line on his right upper arm had a dressing that was dated 6/22/25. The dressing was comprised of a transparent semi-permeable membrane, with pieces of square gauze pads directly over the insertion site preventing observation of the site. During an observation on 6/25/2025 at 12:07 PM, Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), flushed Resident #3's PICC line with normal saline solution and disconnected the syringe, leaving the end of the connection exposed. Resident #3 was observed resting his upper right arm; with the connection against his body. Staff A prepared the IV antibiotic medication and attached the IV tubing to the distal end of the PICC line connection, without…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was safely and properly thawed, stored, and labeled in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: An the initial tour of the kitchen on 4/21/25 at 9:10 AM with the Dietary Manager (DM), an observation was made in the walk-in cooler of 4 rolls (5 lbs. each) of thawed ground beef sitting in a deep pan of red watery liquid, 4 bags (10 lbs. each) of thawed raw chicken in a deep pan of red watery liquid 4 fully cooked hams (5 lbs. each) on a sheet pan and 4 raw turkey breasts all without a label for a pulled or use by date. During an interview on 4/21/25 at 9:20 AM, the DM state that he placed the meats on the rack in the cooler Friday when the truck delivered the food and should have been labeled the meats with the pull and used by date and the meal it was for. Review of the policy titled, Labeling and Dating Inservice, last reviewed on 12/18/2024 read, Purpose: To educate all new hires and current employees on the importance of and guidelines for proper…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on an interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for 1 (Resident #38) of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: During an observation on 4/21/2025 at 9:48 AM, Resident #38 was lying in raised bed with head of the bed elevated watching television. CPAP device is in a labeled bag on top of dresser close to the wall and back from the bed out of reach of resident on right side of the bed. The Resident is bed bound and cannot move about in bed without assistance. Resident #38 has oxygen administered via nasal cannula at 4 liters per minute. During an interview on 4/21/2025 at 9:48 AM, Resident #38 stated, I have not been receiving CPAP therapy every night because some nurses forget to place the CPAP on me. I will wake up at 2 or 3 in morning and not have CPAP on me. Review of physician's orders on 4/23/2025 at 5:00 PM, Resident #38 did not have any orders for CPAP. During interview on 4/24/2025 at 11:25 AM, the Director of Nursing confirmed the care plan should include the use of a CPAP device for [Resident #38's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided, consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 (Resident #38, #44) of 2 residents review for oxygen therapy and CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) devices. Findings include: During an observation on 4/21/2025 at 10:35 AM, Resident #44 was sitting on the side of his bed with oxygen at 4 liters per minute per nasal cannula. During an observation on 4/22/2025 at 10:55 AM, Resident #44 had oxygen at 4 liters per minute per nasal cannula. During an observation on 4/23/2025 at 12:10 PM, Resident # 44 had oxygen at 4 liters per minute per nasal cannula. Review of Resident #44's admission record documented the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #44 dated 8/28/2024 read, Respiratory: Oxygen - 3L PRN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-02-01 · tag F0868 — widespread
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the quality assurance and assurance committee consisted of the required members in 3 of 4 quarters during 2023. Findings include: Review of the QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) agenda attendance rosters for 2023 showed the Medical Director did not attend the QAPI meeting 3 of 4 quarters for months which an attendance roster was available. Review of the QAPI agenda attendance rosters for 2023 showed there were no attendance rosters maintained for 4 of 12 months of 2023. During an interview on 2/1/2024 at 10:05 AM, the Administrator in Training confirmed the former Medical Director had not attended the facility QAPI as required. Review of the facility policy and procedures titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) last reviewed on 2/1/2024 showed the policy read, Procedure . 6. QAA [Quality Assessment and Assurance] Committee include but are not limited to: a) Executive Director, b) Medical Director/designee, c) Director of Nursing/designee, d) Infection Preventionist.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles in 4 of 6 medication carts. Findings include: During an observation of A Hall Front Cart on [DATE] at 9:00 AM with Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), there were one opened Aspart insulin pen with no opened or expiration dates, one opened Lantus insulin vial with no opened or expiration dates, two opened Humalog insulin pens with no opened or expiration dates, two opened Glargine insulin vials with no opened or expiration dates, one opened Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Diskus inhaler with no opened or expiration dates, two containers of Prednisolone eye drops with no opened or expiration dates, one container of Ciprofloxacin eye drops with no opened or expiration dates, and one opened container of Latanoprost eye drops with no opened or expiration dates. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:05…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was properly and safely stored, covered, labeled, or dated in the area of the kitchen coolers and refrigerators. Findings include: During an observation on 1/29/2024 at 9:00 AM, at the time of walk-through of the dietary department with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the CDM and the Male Dietary Aide had beard or mustache with no covering. In the reach-in cooler, there was a 5-gallon container without an identifying label or date, and a large stainless steel bowl with a yellow pudding type substance with no covering, label or date. The microwave had a buildup of food debris and splatters on the door and the inside top of the microwave. During an interview on 1/29/2024 at 9:10 AM, the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) stated the 5-gallon container was iced tea and should have had a label and date, and the large stainless steel bowl was pudding made for nursing staff to pass meds and should have been covered, labelled, and dated. The CDM stated that the microwave should have been cleaned the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and the facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment in 1 of 4 residential halls (Photographic evidence obtained). Findings include: During an observation on 1/29/2024 at 10:55 AM, there were two vinyl tiles that were lifted at the corner in the center of the B Wing Hall floor. During an observation on 1/30/2024 at 12:35 PM, there were two vinyl tiles that were lifted at the corner in the center of the B Wing Hall floor. During an interview on 1/30/2024 at 12:42 PM, the Maintenance Director stated, I started working here in November of last year [2023] and the tiles were lifted. I know they are lifted and have the tiles to replace them in the shed but have not gotten to it yet. I am the only one here. I do not have a work order for the repair. I know I need to fix them. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Maintenance with the last review date of 2/1/2024 showed the policy read, Policy: The facility's physical plant and equipment will be maintained through a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the minimum data set assessment was accurate for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for mood and behavior, Resident #71. Findings include: Review of Resident #71's admission record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including dementia, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia and brief psychotic disorder. Review of Resident #71's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] showed the summary read, Hospital Course: [Resident #71' name] is a 88 y.o [year old] male with past history of diabetes, hyperlipidemia, dementia, Alzheimer's, schizophrenia presented to the emergency room after a fall at his SNF [skilled nursing facility] . Review of Resident #71's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), dated 10/26/2023, revealed diagnosis of schizophrenia checked as a mental illness. Review of Resident #71's psychiatric visit notes, dated 11/10/2023, showed the diagnoses of major depressive disorder, unspecified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition were referred for level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for 2 of 4 reviewed residents, Residents #42 and #53. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #42's admission record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder with onset date of 7/21/2023. Review of Resident #42's level I PASSR completed on 11/28/2023 revealed no diagnosis of bipolar disease listed and indicated that level II PASRR was not required. Review of Resident #42's care plan, dated 4/12/2023, revealed the resident had a mood problem related to depression, bipolar disorder, and anxiety. Review of Resident #42's psychiatric service note, dated 8/18/2023, revealed the resident was an unstable [AGE] year-old female that required an assessment related to symptoms of bipolar disorder. During an interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIATA HEALTH GROUP — 50 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $226K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL